background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022"

input logo icon
"videoThumbnail Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022
Similar videos from our catalog
|

Similar videos from our catalog

О подготовке наступления России и суде с Пригожиным - Венедиктов** / Утренний разворот // 20.01.2023
57:19

О подготовке наступления России и суде с Пригожиным - Венедиктов** / Утренний разворот // 20.01.2023

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Пастуховские четверги / Владимир Пастухов и Алексей Венедиктов* // 22.12.2022
56:39

Пастуховские четверги / Владимир Пастухов и Алексей Венедиктов* // 22.12.2022

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Утренний разворот. Война в Израиле. Венедиктов*. Асмолов. Ахильгов и Воробьёва / 09.10.23
3:06:50

Утренний разворот. Война в Израиле. Венедиктов*. Асмолов. Ахильгов и Воробьёва / 09.10.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Белковский - о ранении Дмитрия Рогозина #shorts
0:52

Белковский - о ранении Дмитрия Рогозина #shorts

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
«Слово пацана» вредно для общества. Андрей Архангельский: Персонально ваш / 13.12.23
46:30

«Слово пацана» вредно для общества. Андрей Архангельский: Персонально ваш / 13.12.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Всё самое важное о повестках через Госуслуги - комментарий юриста / Утренний разворот / 14.04.23
28:31

Всё самое важное о повестках через Госуслуги - комментарий юриста / Утренний разворот / 14.04.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Нетребко VS Метрополитен-Опера, мигранты в Нью-Йорке, референдум в Огайо / Трифекты // 14.08.23
56:10

Нетребко VS Метрополитен-Опера, мигранты в Нью-Йорке, референдум в Огайо / Трифекты // 14.08.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Пастуховские четверги / Владимир Пастухов* и Алексей Венедиктов** // 28.09.23
55:30

Пастуховские четверги / Владимир Пастухов* и Алексей Венедиктов** // 28.09.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Гибель Навального**. «Киви-банк» — всё. Надеждин в Верховном суде. Потапенко*, Кашин*, ММ и АА
3:09:35

Гибель Навального**. «Киви-банк» — всё. Надеждин в Верховном суде. Потапенко*, Кашин*, ММ и АА

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Встреча Навальных с Байденом. Праймериз в Южной Каролине / Трифекты / 26.02.24
56:20

Встреча Навальных с Байденом. Праймериз в Южной Каролине / Трифекты / 26.02.24

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Video tags
|

Video tags

венедиктов
пастухов
живой гвоздь
политика
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:07
[music]
00:00:31
Good evening everyone, you are watching and listening to the
00:00:34
Youtube channel live nail at the microphone I am
00:00:36
Lisa Anikina This is the program the price of the issue
00:00:37
Sergei Aleksashenko Sergei Vladimirovich
00:00:39
Hello
00:00:41
Lisa Good evening Hello viewers
00:00:43
Hello listeners let's start the
00:00:45
situation around the rain TV channel
00:00:47
How do you assess what happened
00:00:50
starting from mistakes I still think that
00:00:52
this is a mistake by Alexei Korostelev on air and
00:00:55
further consequences
00:00:59
Well,
00:01:00
this is a very complex topic. Moreover, I am
00:01:04
quite straightforward and not
00:01:08
too well versed in all the
00:01:10
intricacies of the work of the
00:01:12
media. But as far as I understand, the
00:01:15
Rain TV channel had some
00:01:17
problems before this also with the Latvian
00:01:21
regulator and actually there were two
00:01:23
episodes and in this situation the
00:01:26
TV channel managers had to be
00:01:29
doubly careful about what happened on
00:01:32
the air. In my opinion, I watched this
00:01:35
episode, I was clearly confused, that is, judging by the
00:01:39
following comments there
00:01:41
were some technical things
00:01:47
called guest and the Man needed to
00:01:51
fill the air to get out of a
00:01:58
comfortable situation and
00:02:02
in general, let's say this Yes, he said not that it is
00:02:05
permissible to speak for a
00:02:08
TV channel that was not
00:02:11
before correctly speaking Latvian, that is,
00:02:13
in fact, a TV channel from whiskey is not
00:02:15
necessary and here
00:02:17
any mistake like a sapper is allowed
00:02:20
alone times
00:02:22
The saddest thing is that after all this, the
00:02:24
management of the TV channel was completely
00:02:27
confused, yes, because they first
00:02:28
fired the journalist and then said that no.
00:02:32
In general, it was not entirely true. Because
00:02:34
if a person misspoke, he should have just
00:02:35
said, Excuse me, please, yes,
00:02:37
give him the floor, give him the opportunity to
00:02:39
speak on air you can say that
00:02:41
this is the situation, and when he was fired,
00:02:44
it seems like the channel’s management accepted
00:02:47
responsibility. Well,
00:02:50
this is an unworthy act. Although
00:02:52
no one is immune from mistakes, I know from myself that
00:02:55
when you perform on air or I don’t know,
00:02:58
you even record some... then there are their own videos and there are
00:03:01
reservations Yes, that’s where it’s not
00:03:03
always connected, not always very pleasant
00:03:06
Yes, I was here recently in
00:03:09
one of the conversations Well, as they say,
00:03:12
I mixed up Russia and Ukraine Yes, I’m just
00:03:14
saying and here my
00:03:17
colleague, conversation partner, corrected me Well yes of
00:03:19
course Well, that is, my thought was clear,
00:03:21
but everyone has reservations,
00:03:23
but it seems to me that the problem here is
00:03:26
how the channel reacted to this. It
00:03:30
seems to me that this is a much bigger problem
00:03:31
than the problem of a journalist, but
00:03:34
the biggest problem here is still the cessation the
00:03:37
license of the TV channel Rain has been revoked and
00:03:40
most likely there will be further difficulties
00:03:42
because they are already talking about the need to
00:03:44
take away the rain journalists’ visas and so
00:03:46
on, you don’t have the feeling that Latvia, in
00:03:49
general, has long wanted to get rid of
00:03:51
the rain, then the right occasion just turned up,
00:03:56
Latvia of all three The Baltic countries
00:04:00
are in the most difficult situation and
00:04:03
again this is their home and it’s not entirely correct to meddle in someone else’s house with its own
00:04:06
charter, and it’s
00:04:08
not entirely correct to meddle with your charter,
00:04:10
and you need to understand that the share of the Russian-speaking
00:04:13
population in Latvia is much higher than in
00:04:18
Estonia, and even more so than in Lithuania and
00:04:20
for a long time, again, you can talk as much as you like
00:04:23
about the mistakes of the Latvian authorities about the fact
00:04:26
that they allowed themselves the status of
00:04:28
citizens of non-citizens, as a result of which those
00:04:31
non-citizen residents of Latvia who speak
00:04:34
Russian began to support Putin,
00:04:36
including his aggressive foreign
00:04:40
policy, but still Less than the politicians of this
00:04:43
country are responsible to their
00:04:44
voters Yes and the rain and what about our
00:04:49
respect for it with all our love
00:04:51
Who has Who has more Someone has
00:04:53
less
00:04:54
He was registered as a Latvian
00:04:56
mass media and,
00:04:57
accordingly, had to comply with those
00:04:59
restrictions and those rules Those the conditions
00:05:01
that were specified in his license
00:05:03
But the fact that the
00:05:06
channel lost its license in my understanding is a
00:05:09
big tragedy. That is, I’m not very If
00:05:11
I made the decision in the place of the
00:05:13
Latvian authorities, then of course it wouldn’t be
00:05:15
so tough, it’s clear that this
00:05:17
departure is not worth it But It seems to me that the
00:05:20
real problem is that And for
00:05:23
some reason I don’t have a good explanation
00:05:25
Besides the fact that this is apparently pressure from
00:05:28
Voters E in all countries, well, in
00:05:31
Lithuania in Latvia, especially in the Baltics over
00:05:35
these 9 months Hmm over 10 already 9.5 months
00:05:39
wars and attitudes towards Russian
00:05:42
emigrants, refugees from Russia, towards the
00:05:45
Russian media
00:05:46
towards Russian politicians living in these
00:05:48
countries, there are serious changes in
00:05:51
attitude
00:05:52
and let me
00:05:54
remind you enough that it’s raining. I
00:05:58
understand that there are problems with visas, most
00:06:00
likely the journalists will have their visas revoked. I
00:06:03
understand that the journalists of the new newspapers
00:06:05
that work in Latvia, they also
00:06:07
have such semi-bird rights there. Because
00:06:09
when Dmitry Muratov came to
00:06:12
this country in the spring, he and the president seemed to
00:06:15
have reached an agreement, the president promised him
00:06:16
support so that conditions would be created
00:06:18
when the journalists arrived there,
00:06:20
it turned out that everything was wrong, yes and it’s
00:06:24
impossible there They’ll get them into kindergarten
00:06:27
Well, and so on, yes, that is, something
00:06:29
happened that I don’t know. But I’m talking about
00:06:32
politicians from these countries who are not very willing to
00:06:34
talk about this topic, they
00:06:36
find some kind of
00:06:39
diplomatic subterfuge, talk, but
00:06:42
relations have changed in relation to
00:06:44
changed Perhaps this is connected again,
00:06:47
as I already looked there for the third time, yes,
00:06:48
like a parrot. And what is this pressure from
00:06:51
Voters, and perhaps this is due to the fact
00:06:54
that the
00:06:55
Baltic countries
00:06:57
feel the burden of war, the threat of war,
00:07:02
the problems of war much stronger than
00:07:05
it seems to us, yes, because in in the end,
00:07:07
this state is
00:07:09
not very large in terms of population and territory, and from
00:07:12
what is happening in Ukraine
00:07:14
and in the European economy and in the economies of these
00:07:17
countries, big problems arise and they
00:07:20
have to pay a fairly high
00:07:21
price. But again, it seems to me that to a
00:07:25
lesser extent one should blame
00:07:28
politicians of Latvia in what they did
00:07:31
Yes, we may not understand them, we can
00:07:33
say that from our point of view this
00:07:36
decision still does not look entirely
00:07:39
adequate Well, the same thing is approximately the former
00:07:42
Prime Minister of Sweden Yes, but
00:07:45
nevertheless it is necessary treat this as an
00:07:47
internal political matter of the country
00:07:50
which, in general, lives its own life,
00:07:54
and to my greatest surprise, among
00:07:57
my friends, among others, I saw a
00:07:59
statement in the style of Well, finally, this is
00:08:02
the opposition in quotes, the media close
00:08:05
to the Kremlin are eliminating, expelling So they and
00:08:08
what happiness is needed? It seems to me that
00:08:10
now, when society is very strongly
00:08:12
polarized, when, in principle, taking
00:08:15
some kind of more or less centrist
00:08:16
position, despite the fact that it was raining.
00:08:25
publications opposition to the Kremlin and
00:08:28
journalists politicians and so on And
00:08:30
how adequate do you think it is when
00:08:33
people following professional
00:08:35
rules because journalism
00:08:36
should not take one
00:08:38
specific side are accused of I don’t know
00:08:41
involvement in the Kremlin in propaganda in
00:08:44
favor of the Kremlin, in principle, working for the
00:08:46
Russians security forces and not only departments,
00:08:50
but it seems to me that
00:08:53
today only people with mental limitations can blame the rain for working for the Kremlin.
00:08:56
And I wouldn’t
00:08:59
like to talk about discussing these theories.
00:09:03
But you
00:09:05
gave me a very good muscle. Yes, about
00:09:07
centrist politics, you know what
00:09:10
I was thinking recently dialogue with
00:09:11
my student friends, and they
00:09:14
said about the same thing, it seems to me
00:09:17
that now the position is again not
00:09:20
my position, the position of the politicians of the
00:09:22
European Baltic countries, that now is not the
00:09:26
time for gray, so you can talk
00:09:28
as much as you like from 50 shades of gray to 150
00:09:31
shades of gray, that’s when in the yard of 1942
00:09:34
or 43, that is, good and evil,
00:09:38
and it is not enough not to be about the Kremlin at
00:09:42
this moment and the slightest attempts to talk
00:09:45
about the fact that not everything is so clear, they
00:09:48
can turn out Well, in this case of
00:09:51
human tragedy, it seems to me that
00:09:53
when it comes to good and evil then
00:09:56
everything is clear here and the attempt to find the middle is
00:10:01
objectively doomed to failure
00:10:04
because the longer the war goes on, the more
00:10:08
people die, the more bitterness there is on
00:10:10
both sides. Yes And in this case it
00:10:13
seems to me that the
00:10:15
editorial mistake is precisely an attempt to pass between the
00:10:18
trickles of rain yes an attempt to find, well,
00:10:21
not exactly black and white, but to create a more
00:10:24
diverse picture of the world,
00:10:27
unfortunately now is not the time for such,
00:10:30
for such subtle journalism, other
00:10:32
problems could probably be talked about
00:10:34
with shades of gray, but as far as
00:10:38
uh Russian aggression in Ukraine is concerned
00:10:40
Unfortunately, there is only Black and White. Do
00:10:42
n’t you think that in this way a
00:10:44
significant part of the doubting
00:10:46
audience is pushed away by a country that does not agree with the
00:10:49
Kremlin’s actions
00:10:50
because we are somehow used to it? It seems to me that
00:10:52
in our world we can navigate that
00:10:53
there are those who drown for the Kremlin, there are those who
00:10:56
is pushing against the Kremlin But a huge
00:10:58
part of the audience is that very gray
00:11:00
zone, these are people who either haven’t
00:11:02
made up their minds or they just
00:11:04
told me from TV These are other
00:11:05
opinions I haven’t heard, so that’s probably
00:11:07
how it is And it’s with these people
00:11:09
Probably we probably need to talk to
00:11:10
these people, we need to explain that
00:11:13
everything is not as they say on TV, but
00:11:15
you can’t explain this to people through
00:11:17
a position, everyone who supports Putin is
00:11:21
rare creatures. Let’s burn them at the
00:11:23
stake and generally lock them up in Russia so
00:11:25
that they rot there and don’t they had
00:11:27
no future And no opportunities, it’s
00:11:28
unlikely that people will say after this
00:11:30
Indeed That’s how it is, most
00:11:32
likely on the contrary, they will feel
00:11:34
some kind of rejection, some kind of reluctance to
00:11:36
continue listening to this information,
00:11:39
I honestly don’t Well, that’s what
00:11:42
you said, yes It’s allowed but there are some
00:11:45
absolutely extreme people who are of course there,
00:11:49
and among Russian
00:11:53
migrant politicians there are also such people, but it
00:11:56
seems to me that this is not being discussed now
00:11:58
Yes, it seems to me that after all, well, it does
00:12:03
n’t work out, it’s impossible to
00:12:07
be in the middle, no one is suggesting
00:12:10
lock Russians inside the country Yes, and the
00:12:13
same Lithuania, which is quite tough on
00:12:15
many
00:12:17
issues there, also insisting on black and
00:12:20
white and introducing restrictions for Russians
00:12:22
to travel to this country with Schengen
00:12:26
visas, nevertheless continues to issue
00:12:28
Schengen visas for Russian
00:12:30
political refugees yes that is,
00:12:32
countries find and see, that is, the
00:12:37
politicians of these countries know how to eat, and when they
00:12:39
can find those issues in which they
00:12:42
can cooperate, they can support the
00:12:45
Russians who have a clearly
00:12:47
defined opposition policy. Well, to
00:12:50
talk about what needs to be closed in general, it
00:12:53
seems to me that
00:12:58
the rain is the nail in the hole I don’t know our
00:13:02
colleagues there from other channels that we
00:13:05
have any opportunities to reach
00:13:07
this middle audience. I think it’s
00:13:09
an illusion. Why is it
00:13:13
enough to look at the audience of our
00:13:16
channels? Well, in general, it’s enough How to
00:13:19
say it stagnates in volumes Yes, and we
00:13:23
can talk about the fact that it
00:13:26
would be completely wrong to say Yes, if
00:13:27
you sum up the audience of the rain,
00:13:29
the audience of the nail, I don’t know
00:13:31
Feigin’s audience there Well, and so on there, not even not
00:13:34
very differentiating Navalny there,
00:13:36
count everyone together, even sum them all together
00:13:38
Which is not true Yes, because
00:13:40
there is significant overlap in the
00:13:41
audience that is, all the same, this is what we are talking
00:13:43
about there from a maximum of 10% of the Russian
00:13:46
population, ten percent of Russian
00:13:47
Voters, and beyond the boundaries of this Circle
00:13:50
But we can’t get out And this is not ours,
00:13:53
so to speak, not our shortcoming Yes This is
00:13:56
Our problem this is a problem Well, unfortunately, it’s a
00:14:00
modern one the life of the everyday
00:14:04
average Russian who
00:14:06
really, let's say, is in
00:14:07
the middle and would like, well, maybe to
00:14:11
understand what is happening there, but is not ready to
00:14:14
put a lot of effort into it, that is, you
00:14:16
cannot demand from
00:14:17
the average Russian that
00:14:20
he engage in fact checking and, having heard the
00:14:23
difference in opinions on nails and on
00:14:27
Channel One he was right there in the forest on the Internet and
00:14:29
spent 2 hours trying to find out who is
00:14:31
right and who is wrong, it doesn’t happen. And
00:14:35
unfortunately, that’s all we say and that’s where
00:14:39
our main audience is. Yes, it’s the
00:14:42
same and it’s unfortunately is not growing and now
00:14:46
talk about what But if it rained
00:14:48
if Rain If it was a nail if
00:14:52
Navalny if Khodorkovsky like
00:14:54
took some more moderate position
00:14:56
if they were broadcasting there
00:14:59
they agreed that not everything is so simple and
00:15:01
something even in Russia, it’s good that
00:15:03
due to this, our audience is just
00:15:05
sorting out my words a little. Forgive me,
00:15:07
I’m not suggesting that not everything is so
00:15:09
unambiguous. I’m suggesting that we probably
00:15:11
treat the
00:15:14
people who are here in Russia more humanely and more calmly.
00:15:17
Lisa, this is very difficult for people who
00:15:20
are on the other line front, I will
00:15:21
once again say, I give an example Yes, well,
00:15:24
that is, this is a complete analogy of Germany in
00:15:27
1943, but it is very difficult to treat the Germans
00:15:29
who live in Germany in
00:15:31
1943 well and say there are
00:15:33
even good people there. They do something
00:15:35
good, they give birth children and they
00:15:38
grow bread there, they don’t know, laundries work there, they do
00:15:40
n’t ride bicycles, they
00:15:43
smile, they go to restaurants on Sundays,
00:15:44
but they live a normal life,
00:15:47
normal people, what’s the problem, there are
00:15:49
normal people there, but
00:15:52
unfortunately, unfortunately into a world of war where
00:15:54
Russia opposed itself to the whole
00:15:58
family there to a civilized person there,
00:16:00
let’s say Euro-Atlantic
00:16:01
civilization to Europe and then here, but to
00:16:05
talk about Russia, the Russians about the people
00:16:08
who remained inside the country there
00:16:12
for many is a tragedy Yes, it can’t
00:16:14
be and they would like to change something in your
00:16:15
life there it is impossible for a reason, but
00:16:18
nevertheless to say that there are good
00:16:20
people there Yes there are Yes there are and they say
00:16:22
just look at the Western
00:16:24
media there on Internet
00:16:26
channels you need to go anywhere Even there there are people
00:16:30
who protest and people who
00:16:31
state their position people who
00:16:33
are on trial under investigation in
00:16:36
prison They say and say that there
00:16:38
is an average voter who has
00:16:40
not yet figured it out, that he hasn’t figured it out, he doesn’t
00:16:43
want to figure it out, he doesn’t want to figure
00:16:45
it out, for 9.5 months he hasn’t understood
00:16:47
what is good, what is bad, he hasn’t
00:16:50
understood Who and why is he killing Who invaded there and why?
00:16:52
Yes who and attacked whom. Where is
00:16:55
the War going on and from someone? Who is
00:16:58
taking away territory from whom? That is, if a person
00:17:00
hasn’t figured it out for months, then it seems to me that it’s okay
00:17:03
to say that, well, you know, there’s
00:17:06
no need for everyone there smear with one paint yes it is
00:17:09
necessary Yes
00:17:12
cross and we will give her quietly to the Kremlin
00:17:15
and Lisa is with us We don’t we don’t have access to
00:17:18
this audience all we are trying to
00:17:20
do is we are trying to reach out to her Yes
00:17:23
we are trying to reach out Some people
00:17:24
do it better Some people do it better
00:17:27
It doesn’t turn out worse at all, but for now we are
00:17:32
losing to the Kremlin and we need to
00:17:33
talk about it honestly like this. Kremlin
00:17:35
Propaganda can explain why, but
00:17:37
again, look, take the
00:17:39
middle guy there, Aunt Masha came from work,
00:17:42
came from work, turned on
00:17:45
Channel One, heard the news report, turned on
00:17:47
Channel Two heard the news summary
00:17:49
coincides turned on NTV heard the
00:17:51
news summary Everything coincides three three channels
00:17:53
three three times heard the same thing you
00:17:55
turn on the Internet you see 25 different
00:17:58
points of view And which one is True I
00:18:00
watched it on TV and got it Yes, that’s
00:18:03
one thing but then go deeper like this
00:18:06
Why people they don’t want to trust Putin, they don’t
00:18:09
want to see bad things and so on. That is,
00:18:10
sociologists would explain a lot of things, but
00:18:13
in principle this is exactly the position,
00:18:15
but unfortunately, unfortunately,
00:18:18
we’re still with TV, well, in different weight
00:18:21
categories Yes, and there we can, we’re trying
00:18:24
We want no need to say Yes, we don’t
00:18:26
set such a task for ourselves, of course
00:18:28
we do. Of course, each of us is there, I don’t
00:18:32
know what at the level of a specific
00:18:34
person speaking on YouTube. But what is there
00:18:36
at the Media level; what I don’t know at the level of
00:18:39
politicians. Of course we want to reach
00:18:41
these people. but so far we haven’t
00:18:43
been able to do this, well, such a sad result.
00:18:47
You say they didn’t want
00:18:49
to figure out why you think,
00:18:55
because
00:19:58
and until Mikhail Gorbachev
00:20:01
started the policy of glasnost
00:20:04
until the same newspapers that were the
00:20:07
same television who were not
00:20:09
talking about what was previously
00:20:11
forbidden for the majority of people Well, someone
00:20:13
was whispering and someone knew something, but
00:20:16
in principle people lived their own
00:20:18
lives. They didn’t really understand what
00:20:20
was there in the Soviet history And there was a
00:20:22
Molotov-Ribbentrop lipak yes And how
00:20:25
massive were the repressions And how many
00:20:27
people died in the civil war And
00:20:29
how many fled from Soviet Russia and
00:20:31
how many died in the Second World War
00:20:32
That is, there are all these questions Well, that is,
00:20:35
separately again there is some kind of narrow group
00:20:36
She lets people know about this. I don’t know,
00:20:38
five percent, maybe 7% of the population
00:20:41
talked about it, but the main main part of the
00:20:43
people, she lived yes. And until
00:20:46
they appeared above this, numerous ones
00:20:48
there were not published, the
00:20:51
novels lying on the shelves were not published there.
00:20:54
the films that were lying on the floor didn’t come out
00:20:56
and the bulk of the population did
00:20:59
n’t know anything about it when it all came out and
00:21:01
when Gorbachev needed the first congress of
00:21:03
people’s deputies Yes,
00:21:06
he let it in. What is called live broadcast
00:21:08
too It turned out that there were some
00:21:10
politicians who could say who
00:21:12
spoke much better than the tongue-tied
00:21:14
party leaders who could
00:21:17
explain to people what is good, what is
00:21:19
bad and the country began to change
00:21:22
public opinion nothing changed
00:21:23
again this did not happen in one day or in
00:21:25
one night it took time But
00:21:28
to close all this, do exactly
00:21:29
this Putin began to engage in this from the first
00:21:31
days of his stay in the Kremlin, and so did many
00:21:34
other dictators. He has advanced quite successfully
00:21:37
in this direction.
00:21:39
Because I don’t know a single dictator
00:21:41
who lived in conditions of Freedom of the
00:21:43
media. The first thing he does is: A
00:21:45
limits freedom of speech.
00:21:47
Freedom of information for
00:21:49
people does not limit their knowledge Yes, and
00:21:52
Putin did it and therefore people have no
00:21:53
desire to understand it. It’s too
00:21:55
complicated. Let Putin think for us, we
00:21:57
trust him, we wish you good things, he made our
00:21:59
lives better, he made us richer.
00:22:03
Well, it’s good if we talk about freedom of
00:22:05
speech Doesn’t Latvia’s action in this
00:22:07
situation contradict freedom, the
00:22:10
very idea of ​​Freedom of speech? For example, the
00:22:12
Latvian Association of Journalists already
00:22:13
said that this is wrong. So
00:22:15
we should have different values, and in principle,
00:22:17
well, this is really a mistake, this is really a
00:22:20
rather weak reason for in order to
00:22:22
revoke
00:22:24
Lisa's license, I said it If I were in the place of the
00:22:26
Latvian politicians I would not have done this
00:22:28
I found another solution
00:22:33
for this situation I think that this
00:22:36
decision is wrong but I cannot
00:22:38
say it again this is the Latvian
00:22:40
media in Latvia
00:22:42
on the other side of the
00:22:45
front line from Russia and they look at the
00:22:47
information space of their country
00:22:49
based on their national interests.
00:22:52
So they saw this situation in this
00:22:55
way, they reacted in this way
00:22:57
to what the rain said before, to what the
00:23:01
rain showed before, and to the fact
00:23:04
that what statements were made by the heads of the
00:23:06
TV channel again, this is the decision of
00:23:08
Latvian politicians, we may
00:23:10
like it, but we may not like it,
00:23:14
yes Well, this is a different country, they have
00:23:18
such decisions, but at the same time they well
00:23:20
understand that there is a
00:23:23
huge number in Latvia for other publications of
00:23:25
television and radio Internet for which
00:23:28
no repressions are not carried out,
00:23:31
unlike Russia where there is an all-out
00:23:33
struggle against dissent, otherwise in Latvia this is an
00:23:36
isolated case,
00:23:38
not a speech against Freedom of Speech
00:23:43
Lisa, this is a speech against Freedom of
00:23:46
Speech, yes, because the Independent
00:23:49
Journalist Channel is closed, but it is closed on the
00:23:51
basis of the violations that the
00:23:52
Latvian regulator saw in my
00:23:55
opinion this, I don’t know, the World Cup is going on,
00:23:59
yes And I don’t know there is a violation of the
00:24:03
rules, one football player is an opponent and the
00:24:06
judges can look at this
00:24:08
situation differently, someone can, well, in general, like a
00:24:10
game moment, the ball went to your
00:24:12
team Well, like Play, someone will stop, someone will
00:24:14
step, someone will stop even a
00:24:16
free kick, even a yellow card And someone
00:24:18
will get angry, remember that even before that there were
00:24:20
five similar violations on the
00:24:22
part of this football player and send him off,
00:24:23
yes, this is a human reaction to the
00:24:27
same situation may be different
00:24:29
And here again Well, I will repeat that this is the decision of
00:24:32
Latvian politicians and they have to answer to
00:24:35
their voters, we can make
00:24:37
claims against them, we can be
00:24:39
dissatisfied, we may not like it,
00:24:42
we can say that this is an inadequate
00:24:44
decision, but in the end, this is a different
00:24:47
country with other interests,
00:24:50
well, what do you think about the statement of
00:24:52
Dmitry Bykov who canceled the
00:24:54
event that was scheduled for
00:24:56
December 20 in Riga, explaining that he does not want to
00:24:58
celebrate his birthday in a country where
00:25:00
independent estimates have drive licenses quote
00:25:03
number of positions of Dmitry Bykov
00:25:05
which I respect which I am sympathetic to
00:25:09
person As a free citizen, he has the right to
00:25:13
live there in an unfree country as a citizen of
00:25:16
the world, he has the right to his position,
00:25:19
including expressing it in this way,
00:25:21
here I repeat on air for the fourth time
00:25:25
that I think that this is the wrong
00:25:28
decision. I would have acted differently. Dmitry
00:25:30
Bykov was going to come to Riga to
00:25:32
meet there with Latvian
00:25:34
admirers of his talent, we’ll ask the
00:25:37
readers if it’s possible to tell something about
00:25:39
your creative plans, communicate
00:25:41
like a human being and promote what is here.
00:25:44
Reasonable, good, eternal Well, they say that
00:25:46
no, I can’t come
00:25:48
to this country in such a situation, this is his human nature
00:25:50
the reaction is absolutely incomprehensible
00:25:53
This is the program the price of the issue Sergei
00:25:55
Aleksashenko I’ll take a break for a little advertising
00:25:57
I want to tell you about
00:25:59
such a wonderful book it’s on
00:26:01
shop.dilettant.media you can go
00:26:03
see choose and buy I’ll read a little
00:26:06
description a little excerpt from
00:26:08
what we have is on the site from
00:26:11
time immemorial, the enemy of the people, the enemy of the human race,
00:26:12
encroached on the inhabitants and especially the rulers of
00:26:15
Russia, formal lawlessness began immediately
00:26:17
after the cessation of civil strife from the moment of the
00:26:19
unification of the lands around Moscow, the
00:26:20
pious sovereigns were subjected to
00:26:22
incessant attacks by the satanic forces of
00:26:25
sorcerers, witches, magi and wizards, in
00:26:27
general, an interesting book is called
00:26:29
witchcraft in Russia and the political
00:26:31
history of baptism to the Antichrist It
00:26:33
seems to me that it has very interesting
00:26:34
echoes with our current
00:26:37
modern history - shop point
00:26:39
amateur.media If you buy the book, you
00:26:41
will support us in this way and there is not
00:26:43
only this book but also other publications,
00:26:45
magazines, posters, in general, what do you need you might
00:26:48
like something that could be a good
00:26:50
gift by the way for the New Year or an
00:26:52
occasion in general So come in and buy If you do
00:26:55
n’t want to buy anything but want to
00:26:57
support us there is a QR code and a link under the
00:26:59
video using them you can transfer us a
00:27:01
certain amount because we
00:27:03
work exclusively thanks to your
00:27:06
support program issue price Sergei
00:27:08
Oleg Sashinko at the microphone I'm Lisa Anikina
00:27:10
another topic Putin again raised the issue of
00:27:13
nuclear weapons He said that of course we
00:27:16
will not brandish nuclear weapons like a
00:27:18
razor, but in principle such a threat is
00:27:20
growing the threat of nuclear war And what is
00:27:24
this for? This is a sign that negotiations or rather,
00:27:26
Russia’s desire for negotiations and
00:27:28
success was not crowned with success and Putin is again
00:27:31
turning to nuclear blackmail,
00:27:36
perhaps. So it’s hard for us to get into the throat of
00:27:39
Vladimir Putin’s head and explain the
00:27:42
motives for his statements. It seems to me that
00:27:46
this statement of the president
00:27:48
echoes the recent one yesterday, even
00:27:51
Dmitry Medvedev said that so that Russia there
00:27:53
were no
00:27:54
nuclear weapons, this one was
00:27:57
torn to pieces Well, everything is correct, the Russian
00:27:59
army is not combat-ready The Russian army
00:28:00
began an aggressive war against a
00:28:04
seemingly weak and small neighbor Well, let
00:28:06
’s say smaller in size,
00:28:09
designed for an easy victory, a small
00:28:11
victorious war And then it turns out
00:28:13
that there is no chance to win And in
00:28:17
general, the whole task now is to try
00:28:20
to defend on those lines that are
00:28:23
captured, and it’s clear to Putin that
00:28:26
any Peace agreement with Ukraine in
00:28:29
this situation will look like Victory
00:28:30
yes. The most important thing is not to give everything up, but at
00:28:33
least leave some part of the territory
00:28:36
for ourselves. And it’s just as
00:28:40
obvious that no one will agree to such agreements with
00:28:44
him, first of all, Ukraine.
00:28:46
Because everything depends on it.
00:28:49
Here too, it seems to me that Putin is
00:28:52
so bad. Nerves. In
00:28:55
principle, his nerves are so
00:28:57
stable after 23 years on this post
00:29:01
But it seems to me that he understands that for the
00:29:03
Russian army, for the army
00:29:07
that is waging an aggressive war, times
00:29:09
are difficult. Moreover, it turned out that
00:29:11
Ukraine can strike
00:29:13
Russian military targets located
00:29:15
hundreds of kilometers from the borders. And in
00:29:19
general, Putin is hinting to the West that
00:29:22
maybe you will calm down your
00:29:25
ward there because five in his
00:29:27
picture of the world, Ukraine as an
00:29:29
independent state does not
00:29:30
exist Yes, it is some kind of
00:29:31
puppet A And if only the West
00:29:36
had decided not long ago, and therefore since the West
00:29:39
supports and gives there Ukraine has the weapons with
00:29:42
which it is fighting, then accordingly, if the
00:29:44
West does not give Ukraine weapons,
00:29:46
then Zelensky will have nothing left
00:29:48
to do but bow to Putin, that’s why
00:29:50
the West If you continue to use
00:29:52
weapons, then remember to give weapons, then remember
00:29:54
Yes, here I am, I have a club that
00:29:58
I I can wave Well, of course I will repeat Yes,
00:30:01
as the president, we
00:30:03
won’t wave a nuclear club, yes But remember that I have
00:30:06
nuclear weapons
00:30:07
Putin didn’t actually say anything new,
00:30:10
but this is his Well, how can I
00:30:13
say that there is a shiver of hesitation from one
00:30:17
country in another, he says Yes, I
00:30:19
generally speak for negotiations. Yes, no, well, you
00:30:21
remember that I have nuclear weapons.
00:30:22
Yes, this once again emphasizes that
00:30:25
Well, he himself is already confused about these goals of the
00:30:27
military operation that he launched and does not
00:30:30
sleep and sees how I would like to get out of it Yes,
00:30:32
how would I put an end to it Well,
00:30:36
well, of course, on my own terms, but for
00:30:38
here Well, what else can it be,
00:30:42
and Putin also said that Russia, unlike the
00:30:45
United States, does not deploy nuclear weapons on the
00:30:47
territory of other countries, how
00:30:48
fair is this reproach?
00:30:50
why else is there a reproach? This is a statement of fact
00:30:55
and the same thing can be said that And also
00:30:59
Russia is not releasing iPhones as a sign of protest.
00:31:02
Moreover, it is a sign of protest that Russia is not releasing
00:31:06
civilian aircraft that can
00:31:07
fly across the ocean and be in
00:31:09
demand all over the world. And also Russia is a sign of
00:31:12
protest against aggressive policies The USA,
00:31:14
I don’t know, doesn’t produce good
00:31:17
cars. Well, America, since the
00:31:22
end of the Second World War,
00:31:23
due to the fact that it stationed its
00:31:28
military, created military bases, stationed
00:31:30
its military personnel in different parts of
00:31:33
the globe, generally ensured
00:31:34
global security throughout the world, and
00:31:37
there 80 years of peace after the Second
00:31:40
World War, such a global peace
00:31:42
without serious wars that would shake
00:31:44
all of humanity, this is largely the merit of
00:31:47
American policy, which ensured
00:31:50
and we can talk as much as we want Yes, there is about the
00:31:52
role of the world policeman, but
00:31:54
nevertheless, the American
00:31:57
armed forces ensured freedom of
00:31:59
navigation for the whole world and there, in the 70s, 80s
00:32:02
or 90s, this led to the scale of the
00:32:05
gradual flourishing of globalization when
00:32:07
it turned out that in general, transporting goods by sea is
00:32:09
quite safe and no
00:32:12
one threatens you, and that chains
00:32:15
to the operational chain between enterprises
00:32:17
can be built there through different
00:32:19
countries, different continents,
00:32:22
America opened the way for its companies
00:32:25
and
00:32:26
allowed them to create, export capital,
00:32:29
create uh production capacities
00:32:31
in other countries Yes, due to which
00:32:34
in other countries the standard of living began to rise,
00:32:38
economic growth was ensured A and In principle, this is the
00:32:42
result of uh American
00:32:44
foreign policy uh at some point at
00:32:47
some point quite quickly and there
00:32:49
already in the
00:32:50
forty-ninth year 48 49 it became
00:32:54
clear that
00:32:55
Stalin intended to pursue a fairly aggressive
00:32:59
policy towards
00:33:01
Western Europe and to contain the
00:33:03
Soviet Union, to contain its
00:33:06
aggressive thoughts,
00:33:08
military bases were practically created around there, along the
00:33:10
perimeter of Soviet territory along the
00:33:12
right perimeter of the European
00:33:13
part, nuclear weapons were deployed somewhere,
00:33:16
nuclear weapons were not deployed somewhere
00:33:18
Yes, but actually, neither
00:33:22
American politicians nor American
00:33:24
military officials ever said that they
00:33:26
would redirect their missiles to Tambov or to
00:33:28
Voronezh, Russian diplomats talk about this
00:33:30
all the time Yes, no one there,
00:33:33
no Secretary of the Security Council says that
00:33:35
we will turn you into nuclear Ash
00:33:38
On American television, there is
00:33:40
somehow no talk about this either, that’s why Well,
00:33:43
America is pursuing its foreign policy, it
00:33:46
has
00:33:47
obvious mistakes there she has obvious
00:33:49
rights
00:33:50
and has something to criticize America for. Yes, but it’s
00:33:54
absolutely possible to say that
00:33:55
over the past I don’t know how many hundred years,
00:33:59
not a hundred years. Yes, America, generally speaking, did not
00:34:03
seize parts of foreign territory.
00:34:06
But the Philippines. They were an American
00:34:07
colony of parts of the United States. States, they
00:34:09
let them go free Live
00:34:11
independently in your life, yes, and now
00:34:13
Rika knocks and says Yes, no Well,
00:34:15
take it as the fifty-first
00:34:17
state Yes, no, but Live your life
00:34:19
somehow Well, well, of course you have, we
00:34:21
support you very much, we love you very much You
00:34:23
have your powers, but
00:34:24
we are not yet ready to take you on as a staff, and so
00:34:27
on, that Russia is already there under Putin. This is the
00:34:30
third aggressive war in the last 15
00:34:33
years, feel the difference.
00:34:36
Peskov said that the Kremlin is concerned about the
00:34:38
new US defense budget, which was
00:34:40
approved by Congress.
00:34:42
military aid to Ukraine for 800 million
00:34:44
dollars and what worries the Kremlin
00:34:48
Well, the Kremlin without obviously worrying
00:34:50
right Peskov is worried because
00:34:53
it is we One to one we see a repetition of the
00:34:56
80s of the
00:34:58
70s of the early eighties such an
00:35:00
arms race in which already in the
00:35:03
Eighties the President of Ukraine called the Soviet
00:35:06
Union an evil empire and began to
00:35:09
take the arms race seriously, as in
00:35:12
modern language, decided to sharply
00:35:15
increase the economic cost of the
00:35:17
arms race for the Soviet Union, which
00:35:19
the Soviet Union failed to cope with and this
00:35:21
was one of the reasons for the collapse of the
00:35:23
Soviet economy. But actually
00:35:25
speaking now, America does not hide the fact that
00:35:28
Russia, having become a threat to the world
00:35:33
order, threats to security, for
00:35:36
freedom of life, for a quiet life there,
00:35:40
for the development of the economy, for
00:35:42
tens of hundreds of thousands of people to live there, Russia has become a
00:35:45
military threat, and there is no
00:35:49
need to fight a military threat by military means,
00:35:51
including by increasing the costs of
00:35:54
armed forces and After all, we saw what was
00:35:57
there before February 24, if we say so, for
00:36:01
the period after February 24, the number of
00:36:02
American troops stationed in Europe
00:36:04
increased several times. Yes, and the number of
00:36:07
weapons that the United
00:36:10
States deploys in the state army in Europe expressed
00:36:12
many times over; all of this requires money
00:36:14
unexpectedly It turned out that America is
00:36:17
ready there sharply, the American administration
00:36:19
together with legislators. That is, together with the
00:36:23
Congress, there is a unanimous opinion that it is
00:36:25
urgently necessary to speed up work
00:36:27
on creating a new strategic
00:36:28
bomber B21 and so on, yes, I would
00:36:33
say to a lesser extent now
00:36:34
that there are 800 million for military
00:36:36
assistance to Ukraine These are small elements, uh, it’s
00:36:39
obvious that if the budget for
00:36:43
this budget year is 20 and the second one,
00:36:45
somewhere around 18,200 billion
00:36:49
dollars were spent, in my opinion, if the figure is like that, then
00:36:51
it’s obvious that if the war
00:36:52
continues throughout the next year year
00:36:55
there is a budget year from October 1 to
00:36:57
September 30, it is obvious that there will be military assistance to
00:37:00
Ukraine. Well, definitely no less than this
00:37:02
volume, 18 million, this is total assistance to
00:37:05
Ukraine, this is military assistance, military
00:37:08
assistance from the United States to Ukraine, they consider
00:37:12
it to be the United States, military assistance, not counting
00:37:15
what else is there... my 14.5 billion was
00:37:18
provided with financial assistance from the
00:37:19
government of Ukraine to support the
00:37:22
budget;
00:37:29
it is one of the forms of formalizing
00:37:32
relations between countries; it is in
00:37:34
monetary terms between Ukraine and the
00:37:38
United States; there are no
00:37:40
parameters for these transactions; the land list removes the
00:37:43
children’s law that was adopted; it
00:37:45
removes bureaucratic restrictions
00:37:47
allows the White House administration
00:37:49
to make a decision much faster without
00:37:53
missing some elements
00:37:54
of approval, or significant
00:37:56
elements of approval reduce the period for
00:37:58
reviewing possible supplies from
00:38:01
several months to days Yes, there is nothing
00:38:03
else in the Giese law in this
00:38:05
formulation for Ukraine, it does not contain
00:38:07
some part of supplies to Ukraine
00:38:10
is being formalized according to the principles, a visa of some kind
00:38:12
is issued on the principle of gratuitous
00:38:14
assistance Yes, this is exactly what
00:38:17
it has absolutely no monetary
00:38:19
value, we can’t talk about this,
00:38:20
returning to this topic of Peskov Yes, he
00:38:23
correctly understands that even there
00:38:26
these 15-18 billion dollars in
00:38:30
American weapons, they can
00:38:32
seriously damage the Russian military
00:38:35
machine and lead to the fact that
00:38:38
Russia will ultimately lose this war, and
00:38:40
therefore the Kremlin is afraid, of course, the Kremlin is
00:38:43
wary, while Peskov is silent,
00:38:47
and maybe he just doesn’t know what. There’s
00:38:50
about 40% of the American military
00:38:52
budget he there are 860, in my opinion, a billion
00:38:54
dollars for the next year, generally
00:38:56
speaking, pensions for military personnel, that is, they
00:38:58
cannot be considered at all like
00:39:01
war expenses. Yes, these are the obligations of the
00:39:02
American state to the
00:39:04
military personnel. Well, listen, let him
00:39:06
be scared. Maybe his boss is
00:39:09
also afraid of something. Maybe there, somehow,
00:39:11
some reasons for the investigative connection
00:39:14
began to form,
00:39:16
and you said that assistance
00:39:18
to Ukraine will increase over the next year
00:39:20
if the armed conflict does not stop,
00:39:22
and it is not believed that, on the contrary, assistance will
00:39:25
gradually decrease because of
00:39:27
fatigue because
00:39:28
certain reserves are running out because It
00:39:30
seems to me that a significant part of the
00:39:32
weapons of some countries have already
00:39:33
been sent to Ukraine and it is unlikely that the countries
00:39:36
will continue to help to their detriment,
00:39:40
unlike Russia, which has
00:39:43
classified huge amounts of information there;
00:39:46
Western countries
00:39:48
publish a sufficient amount of data
00:39:50
that allows us to see that, generally
00:39:54
speaking, the United States has supplied no
00:39:56
less than 3/4 of the total volume of military
00:39:58
assistance to Ukraine, all these strange
00:40:00
Western ones taken together, the share of the
00:40:03
United States accounts for
00:40:04
75%, So, accordingly, the key decision
00:40:08
is the position of the United States, the rest of the countries, yes, they
00:40:12
have their own problems, but they also
00:40:15
understand their problems and uh, having seen that in the
00:40:20
modern world war is possible, uh,
00:40:22
which, well, generally speaking, becomes a protracted
00:40:24
land war in which you need
00:40:26
classical weapons, well, like the
00:40:29
mid-20th century, that is, tanks,
00:40:31
artillery Well, Germany has begun to
00:40:34
restore capacity and the
00:40:36
production of howitzer shells and
00:40:38
tanks there, that is It is
00:40:40
quite possible that next year we
00:40:42
will see exactly the opposite effect due
00:40:44
to the fact that this year Germany
00:40:45
placed a large number of military
00:40:47
orders; next year, military assistance
00:40:49
from Germany to Ukraine will increase, yes,
00:40:52
and in absolute terms as a
00:40:55
share of the total package of military assistance we
00:40:58
can only assume that we can talk about
00:41:01
what could happen, but I don’t see
00:41:04
so far any reason to believe that
00:41:05
military assistance to Ukraine will decrease; more
00:41:08
money has become known;
00:41:10
the details of the ninth package of sanctions against the
00:41:12
European Union against Russia are known; finals writes that
00:41:15
in particular there will be a ban on investments in the
00:41:17
mining sector and export
00:41:19
control of dual-use goods
00:41:21
worth more than 2 billion euros and
00:41:24
180 individuals
00:41:26
and legal entities are going to be blacklisted, and earlier, by the way, a
00:41:29
ceiling on the price of oil was established.
00:41:31
Serious - is
00:41:33
this a serious restriction or, in general,
00:41:36
everything that could be serious has already been introduced A
00:41:38
further Well, it’s easy not to stand still
00:41:41
and add a little more
00:41:43
Well, in my opinion, this is a frivolous
00:41:45
restriction because you can
00:41:47
talk as much as you like about the ban on investment in the
00:41:51
Russian mining
00:41:52
industry, but generally speaking,
00:41:54
now you still need to look for a crazy
00:41:56
European investor who
00:41:58
will agree to invest to Russia in this
00:42:00
situation It seems to me that if the
00:42:02
driver of restrictions needs to introduce
00:42:04
restrictions there on the supply of these
00:42:06
technologies on the supply of equipment for the
00:42:09
Russian
00:42:10
mining industry, although I also do
00:42:12
n’t think that this will be a very serious
00:42:14
blow, as for Well, the ban on
00:42:17
the supply of dual-use goods, but
00:42:19
you know how we hear this in every package of
00:42:22
sanctions and I’m the only one who’s never tired of
00:42:25
being surprised, but when are they carrying out
00:42:29
such a more global thing, let’s say in general it’s
00:42:31
impossible, it’s just not possible, but there’s
00:42:34
absolutely no equipment, no
00:42:38
technological goods produced in Europe can’t be dual-
00:42:40
use, donated for
00:42:42
civilian purposes the importance of the military, just
00:42:45
let us impose a total ban on
00:42:47
the supply of all European
00:42:49
goods to Russia with the exception of food
00:42:51
and maybe some set of
00:42:53
medicines, yes, be a painful measure. But you
00:42:56
know, like two billion euros. Well,
00:42:59
probably for some key
00:43:02
enterprises this is it will be very important, very
00:43:04
significant, but it seems to me that when
00:43:06
such a decision is made there for the seventh
00:43:08
time, then it’s
00:43:10
no longer possible to take it seriously. Well, as for
00:43:13
personal sanctions there, well, here in general it’s
00:43:15
already Yes, well, I want to laugh,
00:43:18
on Friday they should pass sentences on Ilya
00:43:21
Yashin if of course there will be no
00:43:22
transfer again listened to his last word
00:43:24
read
00:43:26
Yes I listened to the end What are
00:43:30
Ilya’s impressions on my husband and I am an
00:43:33
honest person I am a
00:43:36
patriot of Russia who wants a future for Russia
00:43:39
and in this regard
00:43:42
Vladimir Putin who
00:43:44
inflicts the
00:43:46
hardest on Russia who brings down the future of
00:43:49
Russia who drives all the young into manure
00:43:54
people of Ilya’s age and
00:43:57
younger than him It’s clear that he
00:44:00
hates Yashin because they have too
00:44:02
different views on life, too different
00:44:05
understandings of what a politician should and should not
00:44:08
do and that’s why Putin
00:44:13
persecutes him Putin punishes him also
00:44:15
there Alexei Navalny as well as Volodya
00:44:19
so
00:44:20
what’s possible I want to tell her I want to wish her the
00:44:23
courage of
00:44:26
capacity Yes, and the hope that changes
00:44:29
in Russia will happen much earlier than it
00:44:31
seems to us today, he said in the
00:44:34
last word that he is not expecting a miracle. Are you
00:44:36
waiting for there is some hope that the sentence
00:44:38
will be at least somewhat lenient? Yes, of
00:44:43
course not This is me, if I say a miracle, then it’s
00:44:46
that changes in Russia will happen
00:44:47
much earlier, and the fact is that the Russian
00:44:50
judicial machine cannot even be called a judicial machine, because
00:44:54
this is a political reprisal, what is
00:44:56
happening,
00:44:59
and so on. This is a political reprisal, and
00:45:03
here you can count on a miracle. Well, it’s
00:45:06
about like a crocodile that there he began to
00:45:09
eat his prey Yes, and for some
00:45:10
reason he changed his mind unexpectedly, probably this of
00:45:12
course happens. But I haven’t
00:45:14
seen many crocodiles in my life,
00:45:16
so that the crocodile stops chewing
00:45:18
something tasty, I haven’t seen it, so it
00:45:22
seems to me that it can even be called a miracle
00:45:23
it’s impossible, but the sentence will be heavy,
00:45:27
the sentence will be cruel, you said that a
00:45:29
miracle is reliable, that changes in
00:45:32
Russia will happen much earlier,
00:45:33
much earlier than
00:45:36
what Vladimir Putin thinks about this and what you and
00:45:39
I think today Yes, because
00:45:42
well, my personal find as if such an
00:45:45
expert with an analytical look, yes,
00:45:48
this is where changes in Russia can
00:45:50
occur there after 2030. But I
00:45:53
think that it will still happen earlier, so I
00:45:55
hope so and it will be a miracle, 30
00:45:58
years will be too much time, it
00:46:01
turns out to be too little because only
00:46:05
the Constitutions that Putin
00:46:06
he rewrote it for himself, he can sit in his post
00:46:09
until 2036, we know how this constitution works,
00:46:13
no, I didn’t say that he won’t
00:46:16
be able to sit there any longer. I just mean that
00:46:19
at that moment, 84 years old, it’s probably different. I’m talking
00:46:23
about the fact that the Constitution is according to the Constitution he,
00:46:25
of course, can, according to our
00:46:27
current Constitution. But won’t
00:46:31
events happen first? Well, in any
00:46:33
case, it seems to me that if Russia is
00:46:35
defeated in Ukraine, this
00:46:38
will seriously shake both Putin and those who were with him
00:46:40
all this time, right hand left hand
00:46:43
sat at his feet
00:46:46
Well, I would say a slightly softer
00:46:48
military defeat of Russia could shake
00:46:51
Putin’s position and could lead to
00:46:54
political changes without a military
00:46:56
defeat of Russia in Ukraine, the chances of
00:46:58
political changes in Russia are
00:47:00
sharply reduced, somehow very
00:47:02
pessimistic.
00:47:04
I understand, but alas, I’m trying to realistically
00:47:09
assess what is happening in the country I
00:47:11
look realistically at what is happening
00:47:13
in what is called the political elite,
00:47:16
that is, the people who make
00:47:18
political
00:47:21
decisions, so I see what is happening in
00:47:25
Russian public opinion. So,
00:47:28
unfortunately, I know how where I will get you
00:47:31
other writers working in the system who
00:47:32
are where I can’t bring myself to uh Well, that
00:47:36
is, there are probably other people there
00:47:38
who will be sure to say that you
00:47:40
know, but already at the end of this year, but in
00:47:42
extreme cases, next year something like
00:47:44
this will happen there and everything
00:47:46
will turn upside down in Russia and everything will be fine Well, I
00:47:48
know how Faith is beyond doubt As
00:47:51
our editor-in-chief says, that’s why
00:47:53
these people can be trusted or
00:47:55
not. I look at
00:47:58
the situation more objectively. I don’t yet see any
00:48:00
signs that political changes are planned there in Russia,
00:48:05
for example, it doesn’t mean that these will happen tomorrow
00:48:07
signs cannot appear And there is
00:48:09
a possibility that this will be mothballed for
00:48:11
decades, as in North Korea,
00:48:13
for example,
00:48:15
I do
00:48:17
n’t see a chance, well, let’s say high chances,
00:48:21
and theoretically, of course, such a possibility
00:48:22
exists and theoretically there is nothing
00:48:26
stopping
00:48:27
Putin’s political entourage and the
00:48:30
second layer and children’s heirs from
00:48:33
trying to create something something like the
00:48:36
Kim empire and transferring power from father to son,
00:48:40
but it seems to me that the political
00:48:44
system that Putin created is
00:48:48
so individualized, so
00:48:51
tied to him personally, his role in
00:48:55
how to say conflict resolution, his
00:48:59
role as a balance, as an instrument of costs
00:49:03
and balances, is
00:49:05
so great that remove this element
00:49:08
from the entire structure, that is, Putin. He
00:49:13
cleared out his entire political there,
00:49:16
not only in the part of the Russian opposition.
00:49:18
But he also cleared out the political clearing
00:49:22
inside his political
00:49:24
system, and there you can talk as much as you like
00:49:28
about the dictatorship of the Bolsheviks. Yes,
00:49:31
but in the Soviet Union It turned out that
00:49:35
after Stalin a certain
00:49:36
political agreement arose and a
00:49:38
procedure was created for replacing the leader, we see
00:49:41
what is happening in China there for 40 years,
00:49:43
according to Ping’s legacy, a system was created for
00:49:47
changing the leader and cultivating a new
00:49:50
generation, and even now when
00:49:53
he followed the path of usur of the first power We
00:49:57
nevertheless see that the political
00:50:00
system of growing shifts, growing
00:50:02
Communist Party personnel there and from the city to the
00:50:05
province from the province in the center, it
00:50:07
works and there will be a constant
00:50:08
renewal of people and people who come
00:50:12
to the top. They have political experience
00:50:14
and life there and an understanding of how
00:50:17
life works. we can say there is a
00:50:19
Mexican institutional
00:50:21
revolutionary party that held
00:50:22
power there for 75 years, but there
00:50:26
was a change of leader every seven years, like Putin, and
00:50:28
that is, not a single political system there
00:50:31
can exist if it cannot
00:50:34
exist sustainably. And if you don’t
00:50:37
raise political successors,
00:50:40
after all also the same family of Kims
00:50:43
there already Grandfather Kim Yes, he began
00:50:46
to raise his son at the moment when the
00:50:48
son reached a certain age and the father
00:50:50
started thinking about a change of power, he began to
00:50:52
prepare him Yes and there yes
00:50:56
Putin has no male heirs Thank God
00:51:00
lines Well, at least
00:51:01
as far as we understand, as far as we
00:51:03
see today And as they say We are all
00:51:06
mortal We are all human and changes can
00:51:09
happen quickly enough
00:51:10
Why do we rule it out It
00:51:13
seems to me that I am not ruling out anything, but
00:51:17
just so that
00:51:18
any Heir of Putin can come to
00:51:22
power he must already now, somewhere in
00:51:26
these power structures, actively
00:51:27
train actively learn
00:51:29
to build relationships, build
00:51:31
contacts, you can be as much as you like
00:51:33
Katerina Tikhonova and receive tens of
00:51:35
billions of rubles from Russian
00:51:37
state-owned companies, successfully use them for
00:51:39
all kinds of projects, but this does not make her a
00:51:41
participant in the political scene. But this was not
00:51:45
done and participants in the political game and does
00:51:47
not give her any chance for a
00:51:50
political future, this is a good life
00:51:52
today under Putin Yes, but her good
00:51:57
life will end exactly at the moment
00:51:58
when Vladimir Putin leaves the stage, which is why it
00:52:01
seems to me that the Putin
00:52:03
system has no chance of survival
00:52:06
transformation into the Kim Empire And here we go again
00:52:09
Never say never, it seems to me
00:52:12
that the chances are very significant they didn’t
00:52:15
take care of a male heir in time
00:52:19
Well, it’s too late to care Yes, because not only did he
00:52:22
need to have an
00:52:23
heir, he also needed to be raised and
00:52:25
raised and taught Therefore, no matter how you do
00:52:29
it, you can’t turn the wheel of history back, you can’t
00:52:32
spin it, it’s a serious mistake, of course, it’s a
00:52:34
serious time to end. Unfortunately,
00:52:37
this was the program the price of the issue Sergei
00:52:39
Alex Sashenka conducted the broadcast. I’m Lisa
00:52:41
Anikina, I’ll remind you that it will be great if
00:52:44
you subscribe to the Youtube channel live
00:52:45
nail on the telegram channel live nail
00:52:47
on the Youtube channel Sergey Aleksashenko it is
00:52:50
marked at the bottom right here is the first line
00:52:52
under the video in the description Sergey Aleksashenko
00:52:55
SR come too Subscribe watch
00:52:58
and of course telegram channels echo echo
00:53:01
news sites there are transcripts and
00:53:05
various materials and applications Echo It’s
00:53:08
very cool and convenient to listen to broadcasts and
00:53:10
not only ours, by the way, not only the YouTube
00:53:12
channel is a living nail, but also our other
00:53:14
journalists on other channels, don’t
00:53:16
miss it. By the way, yes, news appeared there,
00:53:18
now
00:53:20
the news is read out, this is also a separate
00:53:22
pleasure, although it’s not those old
00:53:24
echoey beats that are so dear to
00:53:26
our hearts, but nevertheless the texts and
00:53:29
the voices are familiar, family and, of course,
00:53:31
amazing. Well, so what, I almost forgot the
00:53:34
QR codes If you suddenly missed it in
00:53:36
the middle of the broadcast, there is a QR code in the corner and there
00:53:38
is also a link under the video where you
00:53:41
can transfer some amount to us and
00:53:43
so on in a way to support us, that's
00:53:45
all for today.
00:53:47
Goodbye. Thank you very much.

Description:

В эфире еженедельная программа экономиста Сергея Алексашенко @SergeyAleksashenkoSr и Лизы Аникиной. Поддержать Живой Гвоздь: https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/7edd7c0e Мы выпускаем новый том комикса «Спасти»! Он посвящён предводителю крестьянского восстания, одному из самых известных самозванцев в истории России Емельяну Пугачёву. До 2 января открыт предзаказ с 15% скидкой! Купить: http://diletant.shop/tproduct/243589304-335282898191-kniga-spasti-emelyana-pugachyova-tom-4 Мобильное приложение "Эха": любимые программы в формате радиоприёмника. Простой интерфейс. Работа в фоновом режиме. Расписание эфиров. Скачать: в AppStore: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/%D1%8D%D1%85%D0%BE-online/id1639907671 в PlayMarket: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=online.echofm.app Подписывайтесь на телеграм-канал Лизы Аникиной: https://t.me/echo_episod 🔔 Последние новости и анонсы программ с YouTube-канала «Живой гвоздь», а также контент от наших постоянных гостей и экспертов на официальном телеграм-канале: https://t.me/livegvozd Подписаться на Youtube-канал Дилетант: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuIE7-5QzeAR6EdZXwDRwuQ?sub_confirmation=1 📌 Живой гвоздь в аудиоформате: Яндекс.Музыка: https://music.yandex.ru/album/22141653?dir=desc Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9-%D0%B3%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B4%D1%8C/id1616175210 Google Подкасты: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zb3VuZGNsb3VkLmNvbS91c2Vycy9zb3VuZGNsb3VkOnVzZXJzOjEwOTk2NzA5MDUvc291bmRzLnJzcw?sa=X&ved=0CAIQ4aUDahcKEwigxO3Eweb2AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQEQ Магазин "Дилетант": https://diletant.shop/

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Цена вопроса / Сергей Алексашенко и Лиза Аникина // 07.12.2022"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.