Download "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру"

"videoThumbnail Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру

«SCP-2951: 10 000 Лет» | Короткометражка | Озвучка DeeaFilm

«SCP-2951: 10 000 Лет» | Короткометражка | Озвучка DeeaFilm

Channel: SHORTS [Короткометражки] DeeAFilm

IKOTIKA - Сумерки 2: Новолуние (мини-обзор фильма)

IKOTIKA - Сумерки 2: Новолуние (мини-обзор фильма)

Channel: IKOTIKA

15 САМЫХ ОЖИДАЕМЫХ ФИЛЬМОВ 2022 ГОДА! ТОП! ЛУЧШИЕ НОВЫЕ ФИЛЬМЫ, СЕРИАЛЫ. НОВИНКИ КИНО ТРЕЙЛЕРЫ ОБЗОР

15 САМЫХ ОЖИДАЕМЫХ ФИЛЬМОВ 2022 ГОДА! ТОП! ЛУЧШИЕ НОВЫЕ ФИЛЬМЫ, СЕРИАЛЫ. НОВИНКИ КИНО ТРЕЙЛЕРЫ ОБЗОР

Channel: КиноИндустрия

[BadComedian] - Дерзкое Дно (Лето, Паркур, Куценко, Любовь)

[BadComedian] - Дерзкое Дно (Лето, Паркур, Куценко, Любовь)

Channel: BadComedian

За что мы любим «Властелина колец»

За что мы любим «Властелина колец»

Channel: Кинопоиск

приключения фэнтези комедия Цвет Волшебства Терри Пратчетта 2008

приключения фэнтези комедия Цвет Волшебства Терри Пратчетта 2008

Channel: Фантастика Фильмы Фэнтези

Крутой фильм Затерянный мир фантастика, приключения

Крутой фильм Затерянный мир фантастика, приключения

Channel: Семейное Кино

кино

новинки кино

сто лет тому вперед

что смотреть

кинокритика

кинокритик против

кино 2024

николай никулин

андрющенко

российские фильмы

фантастика

режиссер

александр андрющенко

кир булычев

поп культура

фильм

фильмы

разговор

интервью

разбор

приключения

александр петров

юра борисов

федор бондарчук

алиса селезнева

марк эйдельштейн

обзор

что не так

реакции

константин хабенский

мнение

столеттомувперед

александрпетров

юраборисов

александрандрющенко

федорбондарчук

кирбулычев

алисаселезнева

маркэйдельштейн

чтонетак

кинокритик

константинхабенский

00:00:00

rating on KinoPoisk I have to

00:00:02

like this first of all, oh,

00:00:04

listen, it’s not me you should probably

00:00:05

ask where are the quotes where is plagiarism for

00:00:07

a director this is generally the most painful

00:00:09

issue in science fiction, no one has re-read it they

00:00:12

want it to be bad and what should we

00:00:14

do now don’t shoot bald villains

00:00:16

You can I'm going to change into a producer in a

00:00:19

second now Alice is cosplaying everyone who's wearing

00:00:23

shorts Well, excuse me and Cheburashka did

00:00:25

his job phew count down

00:00:30

Well thank God section 3 that's it, yes we

00:00:35

[music]

00:00:39

started to have skepticism suspicion to mock all

00:00:43

this After the first twenty minutes when

00:00:45

you are truly captivated by the story

00:00:47

fades into the background because

00:00:50

director Alexander Andryushchenko turned out to be

00:00:53

smarter than you, he watched no less films

00:00:55

than you. He knows how to soothe the

00:00:59

audience’s snobbery with irony and

00:01:01

bribe your ego with cinephilic references, proud of

00:01:04

his

00:01:06

observation; time travel in the

00:01:08

spirit of Loki and Back to the Future dialogues

00:01:11

filled with both pathos and buffo Som

00:01:14

yes, such a term also exists fights in the

00:01:17

style of Oldboy Post-apocalypse from Riedle

00:01:20

Scott movie based on the story

00:01:22

of the same name Kira Luch and the

00:01:25

Soviet TV series Guest from the Future

00:01:28

is a fantasy that would be the envy of the

00:01:30

Marvel bosses if, of course, they watched the

00:01:34

film Alexander good afternoon a Good

00:01:38

afternoon, this is not the first time we have met

00:01:40

and after your various trips where

00:01:42

you answered a huge number of questions

00:01:44

before I ask my subjective,

00:01:47

tricky and partly laudable questions. I

00:01:49

would like to start with this and what

00:01:51

question was the most popular And your address

00:01:54

regarding the film 100 Years of Tom, go ahead and

00:01:57

cause a negative reaction in you,

00:02:00

and ask him this question out of regularity.

00:02:03

Well, I probably wo

00:02:06

n’t be able to formulate the question myself; I’m not really sure,

00:02:09

let me give some

00:02:11

honest answers, even if they are strange.

00:02:13

Well, yes, please me I don’t really like

00:02:16

that many people who even praise the movie

00:02:18

and perhaps you are one of these people who

00:02:21

praise it because it is a

00:02:23

metaverse filled with a million

00:02:26

quotes from different and And they even tell me all the time

00:02:28

What a good guy, he quoted

00:02:31

everyone and I don’t really like it because

00:02:33

I didn’t really want this, that is,

00:02:34

there really are a lot of quotes, but I did

00:02:37

n’t want to. I actually wanted it to

00:02:39

be original, so that the feeling from

00:02:42

this work was very

00:02:43

original, and I achieved this. Another

00:02:46

thing is that the heroes of this film are young

00:02:48

guys who seem to exist, well they live

00:02:52

in this pop culture and it seems to me that this

00:02:55

pop culture should sound like

00:02:58

it in everything. Well, the fact is that they make

00:03:00

what kind of music They listen to what heroes

00:03:02

They mention and so on and so on and

00:03:04

so on that’s why for me it’s it seemed

00:03:05

natural, but where I wanted to find an

00:03:08

original move, I was very unpleasantly

00:03:10

surprised by what they said to me. Well, glod,

00:03:12

it’s

00:03:14

id

00:03:16

Tua, this Prometheus Voldemort, and so

00:03:20

on, which I want to answer. Well,

00:03:23

we’ll probably now call all the

00:03:24

bald villains. Yes, that is, I I’m trying

00:03:28

to find something positive in this, but I think

00:03:29

that we probably made a film that, in

00:03:32

the sense of popular culture, is kind of similar

00:03:34

to some of these iconic films and Okay, that’s me, I’m

00:03:37

with this Okay, but what I

00:03:40

sat sort of collected sometimes like a

00:03:42

patchwork quilt of different quotes I do

00:03:45

n’t like it at all And about the throat, the

00:03:47

trailer for Wolverine came out the day before yesterday,

00:03:50

I just want to find it Will there be

00:03:52

comments because in the trailer for

00:03:54

Wolverine there is a bald woman who

00:03:56

controls the will of Wolverine literally like in the

00:03:58

movie 100 Years of Tomorrow I I want

00:03:59

to see if they write that they stole

00:04:02

it from us, well, I must note that not

00:04:03

only me, but also, for example, on the posters in

00:04:05

the article dedicated to your

00:04:08

film, they also find various references and they

00:04:10

also add very strange things in

00:04:13

terms of the fact that the main characters are young

00:04:15

for some task and there the

00:04:18

Lord of the Rings also finds the matrix.

00:04:20

In any case, in that scene when they didn’t

00:04:22

find just that many, that is, plasticine of

00:04:24

rings - this is a direct quote, run away fools,

00:04:27

this is what we are Well, as if everything is clear Is this a

00:04:29

joke

00:04:31

or am I not I know, probably a blow with a heel Well,

00:04:34

probably The Matrix Although this was in

00:04:36

many films besides the matrix and so on,

00:04:38

yes please, but is it possible to say From the

00:04:40

point of view of the idea that the film still has

00:04:42

Two Addressees, I will explain my idea

00:04:45

when we are dealing with science fiction

00:04:47

cinema today quite It’s true that

00:04:49

it’s mostly successful in the fairy tale genre, but as a

00:04:51

rule we see high ratings on

00:04:54

KinoPoisk, good box office receipts but not

00:04:58

the most positive from film critics, but here

00:05:01

it turns out that you made an audience film and

00:05:03

at the same time, with a wink from a film critic,

00:05:05

that is, you tried to play for two

00:05:06

audiences, that was the task I didn’t wink

00:05:09

anything of a film critic, I

00:05:12

kind of say yes, I

00:05:15

read them, I’m interested in their opinions, but I don’t

00:05:18

understand them. Therefore, honestly, but I mean,

00:05:21

because it’s so complicated, it’s

00:05:23

much easier for me to guess what kind of

00:05:26

audience I’m interacting with when

00:05:28

I come up with Tolley is a foreign cinema because, well, that is, there

00:05:30

is a certain hierarchy. That is,

00:05:32

I naturally have to like it,

00:05:34

first of all, then my children there

00:05:37

were super important to me. They are teenagers and this is

00:05:39

the audience. And I tested them a lot,

00:05:42

then the audience, that is, that

00:05:44

to the auditorium of people who buy

00:05:46

tickets that I imagined

00:05:48

because we are making a Big Cinema and I can’t

00:05:50

do it only. Well, that is, I have to

00:05:52

assume that the auditorium is full and

00:05:54

how they will react to it and with whom

00:05:56

I interact and only then film fans and

00:05:58

film critics because, well, it’s just strange

00:06:00

for them to do it because they then

00:06:01

I read there sometimes a person comes in there I

00:06:04

don’t know what mood he’s in,

00:06:06

whether he watched the film to the end, what’s the most I

00:06:09

don’t have this control yet Well, I

00:06:11

mean did the person watch a movie? Did

00:06:12

he look at the phone out of boredom and so

00:06:15

on, well, that is, you can’t give

00:06:16

every review to this one. But what about the reviews

00:06:18

of film critics? They’re kind of

00:06:20

higher for some reason than the viewer’s reviews. That

00:06:23

is, he gave a two. so you put it

00:06:26

like that,

00:06:27

that’s why Yes, no, I didn’t share that, I

00:06:32

quoted what’s fun to quote,

00:06:35

basically I quoted what I myself love,

00:06:37

that’s all, that’s probably based on the

00:06:40

movie 100 Years of Tomorrow, we can

00:06:41

assume the movie that I love, in

00:06:43

which I grew up which influenced me

00:06:45

that’s all it seems to me that it’s so because

00:06:48

Stranger things Yes this is one of my

00:06:50

favorite series and of course when we

00:06:52

wrote the story Well there Especially about children

00:06:55

who make a plan How to defeat evil

00:06:58

and how they figure it out and

00:07:00

so this strength of these young guys who

00:07:03

are resisting some kind of threat to the Universe

00:07:05

for real, of course it was

00:07:07

Kir Bulychev’s, it’s just Kir Bulychev’s, uh,

00:07:09

this threat was not so terrible

00:07:13

But this is an absolute Stranger things, here the

00:07:15

children decide How to defeat the century Well, that

00:07:17

is, this in general, I will add not just

00:07:19

to defeat evil, but villainous evil, it is

00:07:24

formulated again, I continue this

00:07:26

theme of quotes. I noticed among some reviews

00:07:30

there is an opinion that so many

00:07:33

quotes are in any case read by

00:07:35

some critics or film fans or just

00:07:37

viewers, they are true Even but simply in

00:07:39

reviews on KinoPoisk among viewers

00:07:41

you can read this that it seems to them that there is

00:07:43

no actual

00:07:45

originality of the film itself. What would you

00:07:47

answer? I don’t even know what to answer to this.

00:07:50

Well, I don’t want it that way, I do

00:07:54

n’t know how it turned out to be a movie I

00:07:56

can understand I am now in such a

00:07:58

state when I react to it I

00:08:00

look with my eyes I see I see very

00:08:02

different reactions now it’s such a

00:08:04

cycle of emotions just around this That

00:08:06

is, I’m trying to figure out some things that are important to

00:08:08

me I see some more or

00:08:11

less understandable statistical

00:08:14

data rating on KinoPoisk Well,

00:08:17

because at least I don’t know them there yet, at least

00:08:19

20,000 this is at least not the opinion of people there

00:08:22

and I can understand that it’s like the movie is coming in. I

00:08:25

see what’s happening there in the comments

00:08:27

So To be honest, I’m very

00:08:30

happy, but of course I wanted to be original

00:08:33

And I think that this work is

00:08:34

original Well, as if in its integrity,

00:08:37

that is, from beginning to end from the first

00:08:38

minute to the last, how I wanted to

00:08:40

build this story It’s built this

00:08:42

way Well, I’m just I don’t know from there.

00:08:45

Sorry, I didn’t want to compare this myself,

00:08:47

but Tarantina are original

00:08:49

works because they consist of a

00:08:51

huge number of quotes. If you

00:08:52

read his latest book, but the

00:08:55

one he published there about his childhood

00:08:57

impressions of films, it’s a huge

00:08:58

discovery for me because he

00:09:01

just quotes, yes, he quotes films that

00:09:04

no one from the general audience has seen, and

00:09:06

neither have I, but when he describes the scenes

00:09:09

that amazed him in childhood, they are all

00:09:11

there in his films and therefore, in this

00:09:13

sense, his films apparently look

00:09:14

original Because when you

00:09:16

quote then what was there 40 years 50 ago

00:09:18

and what no one saw and it looks

00:09:20

more original but in general We

00:09:21

quote, of course we live in a world of quotes

00:09:24

probably quotes in the film 100 years of Tom

00:09:26

forward is closer and much more and due to the fact that

00:09:29

we are still a genre everything -well, you said fairy tales,

00:09:32

but fairy tales are more authentic

00:09:35

Yes, some kind of folklore theme for the Russian

00:09:37

audience But science fiction

00:09:40

We come in and immediately as soon as we

00:09:42

put on some kind of costume We all immediately

00:09:45

enter the territory of Marvel comics

00:09:49

American matrices fifth elements We

00:09:51

come in to a territory that is, as it were, not

00:09:53

ours, and this seems to me to be a

00:09:56

fundamental difference, and they start

00:09:57

talking to me, and they’re only talking to me. I’m

00:09:59

just already at the last interview,

00:10:01

and there’s already the image of Alice and this is Resident Evil,

00:10:06

I think, Lord, what a part, but she was

00:10:08

in some- then in shorts I say this, that

00:10:10

is, all the heroines who were in shorts

00:10:13

now now Alice is cosplaying everyone who is wearing

00:10:15

shorts swallow cosplay of all the bald villains

00:10:19

of which you can list hundreds There and

00:10:21

so on, the merry fellow of everyone who laughs Well,

00:10:24

there and everyone who has Swords and all the psychopaths

00:10:27

And these are all who have Well, in short and so much

00:10:30

just of all this, that’s why Yes, I made an

00:10:33

original work. It just

00:10:35

seems to me that we have entered the territory

00:10:38

where Well, we have found ourselves in this

00:10:40

cycle in which we are compared with

00:10:42

all other similar films and This is a

00:10:44

new territory for Russian cinema

00:10:46

It seems to me because it’s Well, it’s like it’s not

00:10:49

authentic, it’s a little bit and People’s no, that’s

00:10:53

how it now seems to me than the

00:10:55

complex genre of adventure fiction

00:10:58

Yes, I did that on purpose, that is, it’s like it’s

00:10:59

not quite it’s not Hard fiction,

00:11:01

you can’t say that it’s science

00:11:02

fiction, it’s adventure

00:11:04

fiction such soft science fiction what is

00:11:06

called in it there is no recognizable DNA in

00:11:10

it there is no what I call Baba Yaga

00:11:12

Kolobok in it there is no this feeling it is

00:11:15

ours Well not yet I really hope that it

00:11:18

will happen over time this DNA is now

00:11:21

being replaced by the DNA of Kira Bulycheva Yes and Kira

00:11:24

Bulycheva it was Honestly speaking, it seems

00:11:27

hard to me, I read one of his articles, I’ll

00:11:29

now finish this thought with his quote, and

00:11:32

in front of the students I found it on the Internet.

00:11:34

I hope it’s true, but I read it

00:11:37

somewhere when I was studying Kirb, there was a

00:11:39

quote written there in front of the students, he

00:11:41

said that to be a science fiction writer he spoke

00:11:42

with approximately the same intonation that I now

00:11:44

seemed a little guilty, he said

00:11:47

Yes, unfortunately, being a science fiction writer is like

00:11:49

now I won’t be responsible for the accuracy of the quote

00:11:51

I apologize right away, but the meaning was that

00:11:53

being a science fiction writer is like

00:11:55

tap dancing He says this will always remain

00:11:58

low genre of literature He says

00:12:00

No matter how you write science fiction, you

00:12:02

will always be worse than the worst ballerina, he

00:12:06

says, apparently from this I conclude

00:12:08

that Kir Bulychev was in a situation

00:12:10

where he was constantly hinted that you’re

00:12:12

not writing serious literature, you’re

00:12:14

just kind of you’re doing some kind of work Well,

00:12:18

where are we now that we can

00:12:21

relate to Kir Bulychev’s literature in any way we want?

00:12:22

But it turned out that it definitely influences

00:12:24

people very seriously and remains in the

00:12:26

memory. Well, in addition, yes, a great idea

00:12:30

immediately came to mind with the phrase that a

00:12:32

film is a in fact, a series of

00:12:34

imitation, but for everyone it is an

00:12:36

inimitable series, and the question is how

00:12:39

you scatter these quotes throughout the film,

00:12:40

but here’s the last thing to finish with

00:12:42

quotes. I know that you also teach

00:12:44

directing and several times in interviews

00:12:46

you talked about what you actually already know

00:12:47

all the dramatic moves and you know how to

00:12:49

come up with any solution for this or

00:12:52

that twist without spoilers There is a

00:12:55

moment in the plot twist that clearly seems to

00:12:58

quote Back to the Future, at

00:13:01

what point are you, as a theorist, as a

00:13:02

teacher of directing, at what point

00:13:05

can you say where the quote is and where the plagiarism is

00:13:08

already Oh, listen, you probably shouldn’t

00:13:10

ask me where the quote is, where is

00:13:12

plagiarism and what is plagiarism? To me,

00:13:14

in general, plagiarism has a negative

00:13:17

connotation, meaning that it’s you, yes,

00:13:20

I’m correct, yes, that is, it’s

00:13:21

positive Yes, there is plagiarism Well,

00:13:24

I guess we’ve answered this question

00:13:26

plagiarism somewhere causes negative emotions in us,

00:13:37

an attempt to simply persuade a good decision,

00:13:40

that is, we say there is also such a

00:13:41

concept as a stamp, at school we discuss

00:13:44

What a stamp is, we speak, in my opinion, with

00:13:46

Andre Nikolaevich Pershin, in my opinion, these are

00:13:49

his words, even he says that stamp -

00:13:51

this is a very cool solution a very

00:13:54

cool solution invented

00:13:56

a long time ago by someone else

00:13:59

and if it is your story It kind of fits

00:14:02

and lives in your story, it seems to me

00:14:05

Well, a controversial issue in short The main thing is that

00:14:07

it does not cause negative emotions

00:14:08

why does it cause negative emotions

00:14:10

if it inappropriate and lives on its own

00:14:12

or it, well, that is, there is a stamp of a phrase Yes,

00:14:15

some lines that

00:14:17

have been spoken a thousand times and are inappropriate here, and

00:14:20

so on. In the case, as I understand the story

00:14:23

with Yes, which we don’t call just

00:14:28

time travel to me It seems that look at how I

00:14:31

felt about this. So there is a

00:14:33

big genre of science fiction called Time

00:14:35

Travel, time travel,

00:14:37

quite a lot of films have been made on this topic and

00:14:39

quite a lot of stories have been written, the

00:14:42

main essence of them is generally

00:14:44

just about trying to go to the past

00:14:47

in order to change the future Yes And in this

00:14:50

butterfly effect there are other theories of

00:14:53

the time continuum Yes, there are very

00:14:56

fascinating ones, for example in the stories of Ted

00:14:58

Chan, they are generally amazing Well, in fact,

00:15:00

one of the stories was

00:15:05

filmed Where temporarily time does not

00:15:08

change, on the contrary, it is very impossible

00:15:10

to change time, you have to kind of move along it

00:15:12

just there the essence of this civilization and

00:15:14

to be aware of moving and performing Yes and

00:15:17

performing and the steps that are

00:15:20

intended for you But the main genre Well, the

00:15:23

main story in the Time Travel genre is

00:15:24

the most popular - this is a change

00:15:26

in the past Yes, a change in the future due to the

00:15:28

fact that the effect of women

00:15:29

and we went there are the most popular

00:15:31

films in in this genre, it’s probably there, yes

00:15:34

it’s Back to the Future, there’s also the Terminator Yes, and

00:15:37

one is an adventure, the other is more of a

00:15:39

thriller, such an action, and there are less

00:15:41

popular stories that didn’t go that far,

00:15:43

more complex ones there, too, in this genre,

00:15:45

so this literally quotes a

00:15:47

literal move from Back to the Future, but

00:15:49

from -because this is a super emotional

00:15:51

moment in the film In my opinion and it

00:15:54

evokes in my opinion Well, I want to

00:15:57

hope, let’s just say that I saw

00:15:59

rather admiration for the action of the hero, he is the

00:16:02

decisive one of the decisive actions

00:16:04

Unexpected action zas taplin nae

00:16:06

action Yes, quite I think deftly in

00:16:10

and so on, which works as a

00:16:12

kind of recognition of some truth that

00:16:15

gives us a very positive emotion. I do

00:16:17

n’t see a problem with this, again,

00:16:19

because if we dig deep,

00:16:21

we’ll probably find that this didn’t happen in the back future,

00:16:24

but in some book It’s good

00:16:26

not in a film, but in some book

00:16:28

written before, because no

00:16:30

one has re-read science fiction, so plagiarism is bad

00:16:33

where it’s bad, where we watch, and again

00:16:36

this is in the

00:16:38

classroom because someone, that is,

00:16:40

someone looks and says, there is a

00:16:43

category of spectators who look at

00:16:44

the throats and say that

00:16:46

this is the antagonist from Dune

00:16:50

2, well, excuse me, and even someone on the

00:16:53

Internet Swa probably saw the director

00:16:55

when they were filming there years ago, but

00:16:57

maybe there were already some, they are trying to

00:16:59

prove that this is plagiarism, they want it

00:17:01

it was bad, but some people look and do

00:17:03

n’t seem to see Well, yes, there are bald villains, what should

00:17:06

we do now, don’t make bald

00:17:07

villains about a bald villain a little later, I’ll

00:17:10

ask a question In general, how did I come up with this

00:17:11

image, I want to continue about

00:17:13

time travel, there are really a lot of

00:17:15

films about time travel and

00:17:17

most often they become fans and,

00:17:20

moreover, as soon as they become

00:17:21

fans these fans begin to look for

00:17:24

some inconsistencies because it’s

00:17:25

really difficult to come up with a world

00:17:28

where your present would depend on the

00:17:30

past changes in the past would affect the

00:17:32

future here Was there any

00:17:35

fear that something wouldn’t work out and the audience

00:17:39

would start looking for some flaws? Well,

00:17:41

look at something. I can’t even tell you that, something of

00:17:44

course didn’t work out, but that doesn’t

00:17:46

matter if the story works, that

00:17:49

is, the Time genre in general Travel me

00:17:53

Sorry that I will contact and

00:17:55

reinforce myself with great masters, but I

00:17:58

once Studying the genre of science fiction, we are not for

00:18:00

the first time, as it were, entering the territory of

00:18:02

science fiction, time travel for

00:18:04

the first time, but we have already been to the territory of science fiction

00:18:05

many times and,

00:18:07

frankly speaking, most successfully in Russia and we are proud of this

00:18:11

but I have James Cameron has a

00:18:13

documentary consisting of

00:18:14

four episodes about science fiction I

00:18:16

watched yes yes And there is an episode about Time

00:18:18

Travel and they are there I don’t think with

00:18:21

Robert Zemeckis they are sitting like the author of the

00:18:23

Terminator and the author back the future of the two

00:18:25

most popular films about

00:18:27

time travel sit and talk admit that

00:18:29

both of them do not stand up to criticism if

00:18:32

you dig Yeah because naturally

00:18:34

this story with the butterfly effect, what if

00:18:37

something happened there then how did this hero

00:18:39

Here and why and it’s complex it’s it’s also

00:18:44

difficult to perceive at speed in the

00:18:46

sequence of time and when you

00:18:48

usually watch a movie, if the story is if

00:18:50

the narrator tells it in a fascinating way as a

00:18:52

director, then you don’t have any questions, then

00:18:54

you start going back and it’s like,

00:18:57

wait a minute and they confess there, in my opinion in the

00:19:00

Terminator there’s even a move when Sarah

00:19:03

Conor says wait Well, if in my opinion

00:19:05

she records this plot hole in a voice recorder

00:19:07

and at the end she herself seems to give the viewer a

00:19:11

hint. She says, well, if you think

00:19:12

about it, you can go crazy and closes

00:19:14

this question, yes, or is it from the series of the

00:19:18

brilliant nono VSS in the argument when he

00:19:20

says Don’t try to understand just

00:19:22

feel and you’re like Okay maybe

00:19:25

100 years are missing this phrase don’t try to

00:19:27

understand just feel but we have our

00:19:29

own there these stories with explanations Yes

00:19:31

explanations are a complex genre, there is almost

00:19:34

always a hole in it and not because

00:19:37

she is really present there

00:19:38

because a scientific consultant worked on our film

00:19:40

and I am very

00:19:42

proud of this. We spent a lot of time on this,

00:19:44

but because I was checked and

00:19:47

the terminology there is no random

00:19:48

terminology and all the moves in general seemed to have

00:19:51

been checked all the nonsense was removed

00:19:53

because when we write we invent

00:19:55

some terms and something else, then

00:19:57

all this was checked and

00:19:59

But

00:20:01

nevertheless, it should not be 100% scientifically

00:20:05

reliable; a feature

00:20:07

film does not have such a goal because I think that physicists

00:20:10

can even laugh at interstellar, as if

00:20:13

they were talking anyway, well, I went to

00:20:15

our scientific consultants who

00:20:17

say that

00:20:18

our interstellar will definitely say yes of

00:20:21

course Well, as if because if you

00:20:24

dig like that with any consultant

00:20:29

and the doctors are real who And you took off the

00:20:31

medicine I see, well, it seems to me,

00:20:34

of course, that’s not the point, the point is: Can

00:20:36

you tell an emotional story,

00:20:40

do it in such a way that the viewer does

00:20:42

n’t get bored? That’s what you have to do A And

00:20:46

these these if these are like bumps Yes,

00:20:49

some kind of pits are present in your

00:20:51

stories, the viewer should not notice them and

00:20:53

skip them, they should not

00:20:54

disappoint him, ideally and During the second

00:20:56

viewing and so on, there

00:20:59

is sometimes a limit when it

00:21:01

disappoints you, and even the best masters

00:21:03

there, well, that is, there is Nolan who

00:21:05

tells us super complex story

00:21:07

we get pleasure from it but there

00:21:09

but he has a film argument which I

00:21:12

went to watch three times I found it

00:21:13

fascinating to figure it out I

00:21:15

really did draw diagrams I went the second

00:21:17

time I went the third I found this puzzle

00:21:19

interesting but I saw people who

00:21:21

leave the room in the middle of the sessions

00:21:24

because they give up, I understand them too, I do

00:21:26

n’t seem to blame them because it’s difficult. Well,

00:21:28

you’re losing. They just make you

00:21:30

think too much. Is it because you’ve

00:21:34

resorted to a certain method

00:21:36

called breaking the fourth

00:21:38

wall? an attempt just to satisfy the

00:21:41

viewer who left the show without

00:21:43

understanding what it is, as if this is the

00:21:45

destruction of the fourth wall as an

00:21:47

opportunity to explain and make the film

00:21:49

clearer Yes, 100% I am in general now, well, this is what

00:21:53

I clearly understand about myself as about

00:21:55

the author I am in general now I

00:21:57

I’m making a special discount because, uh, I’m

00:22:00

quite a young author. I assume that this is

00:22:03

the beginning of some kind of path of mine and I think

00:22:05

that both the style and sensations will

00:22:08

change over time and with age. I

00:22:10

hope that I will still make films, but

00:22:12

at this stage it’s very important to me The setup is

00:22:16

very much in the story for me. It is very important

00:22:19

for the viewer to understand what is happening. Uh-huh, at the same

00:22:21

time, I want to tell

00:22:23

complex stories and I am proud of what I see.

00:22:27

I may be wrong

00:22:29

from the point of view of directing, but that

00:22:31

100 Years Ahead makes people

00:22:34

think a lot. as if they were sitting thinking So

00:22:36

and this and then now and and how

00:22:40

the thought process goes, this is not always

00:22:41

correct, I say Because if

00:22:42

the viewer is forced to think too much,

00:22:44

well, a lot of viewers, in the entertainment genre, they can be

00:22:47

offended and leave

00:22:50

because that is not what they are for they came so that

00:22:51

their heads would smoke in the hall, they should

00:22:53

somehow get some kind of pleasure and

00:22:55

experience more emotions rather than

00:22:58

straining their heads, but I’m proud that

00:23:00

the film 100 Lemu Forward makes the viewer

00:23:03

think, and now even now the

00:23:06

educator is a little bit like a young viewer

00:23:08

to think children to think because they have them,

00:23:11

that is, they are being held by a movie They are trying to

00:23:13

figure out what’s going on They don’t

00:23:15

understand everything Let them go a second time

00:23:16

everything is pretty harmonious Let them think again Let them think again Let them think again They’ll

00:23:21

think again That’s why At this stage of

00:23:25

my journey It’s very important for me to understand

00:23:28

what happens in the film, yes, that is, I, I, and that’s why

00:23:31

we came to this story by breaking the

00:23:34

fourth wall, there are also these

00:23:37

radical decisions with video games at the

00:23:38

beginning with this attempt to explain. By the

00:23:41

way, I read this, I read this, I don’t

00:23:43

remember this, this is honestly what I want look

00:23:46

there is a story with the game Well, everything is

00:23:48

constant Yes, I just didn’t see I saw

00:23:50

that someone wrote about it but I but I don’t

00:23:52

remember it I don’t remember where

00:23:54

it happens but it’s interesting

00:23:55

actually it happened because it’s very

00:23:58

complex setup two times many heroes

00:24:02

all this is needed, as if all these chess

00:24:04

pieces must be placed very clearly on the

00:24:07

board in order to continue to play them in a fun way

00:24:09

and therefore I very much understand

00:24:11

the comment that Well, the guys need the first

00:24:14

20-30 minutes to get into it all and

00:24:17

then it charges and, as it were, rushes

00:24:19

forward Well, that’s how we are, for the

00:24:21

first 2030 minutes I wanted to make it

00:24:24

exciting and tried to make it

00:24:26

as exciting as possible, but essentially we are the

00:24:28

first act, we are harnessing which then

00:24:30

should go great, so since there is a

00:24:33

lot of information then this is over

00:24:36

time this is not with the first

00:24:39

drafts what kind of how

00:24:42

this future was formed Why do they live in it And how did

00:24:44

this happen because this is a

00:24:46

completely new theory that it would exist

00:24:48

Contact And so on and so on and all this

00:24:51

someone must have explain someone

00:24:52

had to tell and we had

00:24:54

some versions I remember I don’t know that there is

00:24:55

some kind of report at Alice’s school someone

00:24:58

Nuno then you think that the report Well and you

00:25:00

are looking for some form but then when to

00:25:03

me It seems that in many ways I

00:25:05

can lie now, but I’m definitely established in this form.

00:25:08

When Mark appeared

00:25:10

because it just suits this

00:25:12

artist Mark Eidelstein. That is, he

00:25:14

knows how to do it. It turns out great, it

00:25:17

works and that’s it. And we took this step. it

00:25:19

wasn’t invented right away. I can only

00:25:20

say that this breaking of the fourth wall, the

00:25:22

acting work here is truly

00:25:23

outstanding, it seems to me that no one is

00:25:25

arguing. But about So differently, yes,

00:25:30

there are still disputes No, I haven’t met

00:25:32

everyone, and even those who are

00:25:35

always envious Alexander Petrov was criticized,

00:25:38

everyone agreed that this was

00:25:41

really his big role, but I’m

00:25:42

not even talking about the acting. But

00:25:44

let’s talk about the beginning again, let’s talk about the plot.

00:25:47

I noticed that there are a lot of discussions on the Internet right now

00:25:50

about the fact

00:25:54

that the first 20 minutes of the film are incomprehensible. And

00:25:56

then After 20, I

00:25:59

even got into an argument with Stanislav

00:26:01

Rostotsky, such a guy who didn’t finish watching,

00:26:03

just the street after 20

00:26:05

minutes, to which I answered. Maybe it was

00:26:06

just worth sitting a little longer, and

00:26:09

yet why are these 20 minutes being

00:26:12

celebrated by everyone? look, there may

00:26:15

be a sag in the drama, or in

00:26:17

fact, this is, in principle, characteristic of all

00:26:19

films of this genre, that for 20 minutes

00:26:21

it needs to be accelerated, don’t

00:26:23

look, there is no drama there, it does

00:26:26

n’t even begin,

00:26:28

the act is a setup, it’s an exposition of the story,

00:26:31

we get to know the characters with

00:26:34

whom we must whom we must a

00:26:36

understand b ideally connect or at

00:26:39

least they should intrigue us these

00:26:41

characters so that we become interested in what

00:26:43

will happen to these people in the future I

00:26:46

think this exposition is a super important

00:26:48

thing naturally Because if you don’t

00:26:50

understand about whom and not understood In what

00:26:52

circumstances and did not understand in what

00:26:54

space and with whom they interact

00:26:57

you next Well, I just gave an

00:26:58

example with chess you

00:27:01

set up we will play According to these

00:27:03

rules and only then in the transition to the so-

00:27:06

called second act you say And

00:27:08

now the game An exciting game has begun and begins.

00:27:10

But if you have

00:27:12

n’t explained this exposition clearly and clearly,

00:27:15

the game won’t start. I

00:27:18

always tell the students how I

00:27:21

watch football with my wife and, for example, she doesn’t

00:27:24

cause it either. That is, if My children and we

00:27:26

are sitting there and for every touch we

00:27:29

there she doesn’t understand what’s happening to us,

00:27:31

we’re connected, we know that 11

00:27:34

11 field the ball needs to go there this one for this this one

00:27:38

for this we know the rules of the game and so in

00:27:41

any sport Well, you can pay

00:27:43

attention or I can’t, but once I

00:27:44

turned it on American football I don’t understand at all

00:27:45

what’s going on, that they’re all yelling

00:27:47

Because I don’t understand where they’re all

00:27:48

running and why the same thing is here next,

00:27:51

the task of the authors Well, it’s difficult to learn how to

00:27:54

tell this exposition in an interesting way in

00:27:58

interesting circumstances, in actions it’s

00:28:00

interesting to reveal this character from the beginning

00:28:02

Well, in in this case, well, as

00:28:06

if these 20 minutes do not seem

00:28:09

interesting to someone and in general if people leave

00:28:11

after 20 minutes of the film I think that this is not

00:28:14

connected with the film I apologize

00:28:16

because in order to leave the cinema after 20

00:28:19

minutes it must indignate you

00:28:20

so much because the viewer also has a

00:28:22

credit of trust in the film Well, what can I do? It’s the

00:28:24

worst film. I’ll still wait 30 minutes.

00:28:27

I’m not tired yet. I have a

00:28:29

credit of trust. Therefore, if I leave

00:28:31

after 20, it means something happened that

00:28:33

outraged me incredibly. Well,

00:28:35

offended feelings to one degree or another, well,

00:28:37

that is, I was deceived or

00:28:40

something else, I think that further this is no longer

00:28:41

connected with the film and I’m not very worried

00:28:43

with all my love for Stas Rostovsky. I do

00:28:45

n’t worry at all about his opinion. Well, it’s

00:28:47

not my fault that he left,

00:28:49

really, I can’t blame myself for this,

00:28:51

if only he had watched the movie

00:28:54

in detail, well, he would have said his opinion. Well, I

00:28:57

probably would have been able to talk about it, but

00:28:59

in the continuation of the exposition, then we can

00:29:01

make out a little bit the moment of that world of those

00:29:04

circumstances in which

00:29:08

you are immersed in the year 2024. Well, sometimes it’s true that

00:29:12

they say that there are no signs of our

00:29:14

time. Well, what signs of our

00:29:16

time are there in Marov’s films, for example?

00:29:18

But the question is about the Moscow of the future

00:29:21

because in fact we only have locations there: the

00:29:23

school Botanical Garden Well, that’s

00:29:24

all the laboratory Well, the general plan of

00:29:28

the panorama is a very beautiful one invented by

00:29:30

Moscow. So many would like to

00:29:32

see more of it and immerse themselves in

00:29:34

these circumstances. Yes, I answer these

00:29:36

questions. I would also really like to. Well, yes,

00:29:38

money, no, it’s not about the money, here it’s

00:29:41

about the format in fact,

00:29:43

Because if we, as I really

00:29:46

hope, will someday switch in this

00:29:49

Universe to the format of serials and

00:29:52

serial stories in particular, then of course I I I

00:29:56

myself regard this as Well, if you can

00:29:58

call this a drawback of this film, yes

00:30:01

I would really like much more

00:30:03

details of this world Moreover, the

00:30:05

pleasure A from Bulychev’s books and from

00:30:08

The Secret of the Third Planet is connected precisely with

00:30:10

the details, he is a great Dreamer and the

00:30:13

pleasure from this genre is connected with the

00:30:15

details, like what character and

00:30:18

why and what they And what they drink here And

00:30:20

what they eat A what do they dress in? And why, and

00:30:23

so on, and so on, and so on, yes,

00:30:24

money, I won’t hide it, money also doesn’t

00:30:27

allow me to do some things as

00:30:29

I would like, but that’s it. This is already

00:30:31

an excuse; in fact, this topic is, as it were, the

00:30:34

world is not completely it was revealed because there

00:30:36

just wasn’t enough timing for it

00:30:38

because you have to go on an

00:30:40

adventure quite significantly. In this

00:30:43

genre you have to go on a

00:30:45

journey You have to fight for this

00:30:47

space and so on and so on and you don’t

00:30:51

really have time tell in detail

00:30:53

who lives where and what, well, how could I

00:30:55

tell how the main thing is how things are for me

00:30:58

in the world and life of Kolya and probably less in the

00:31:02

world and life of Alice since there simply is

00:31:04

less playing time in this

00:31:06

future of her Well, yes That’s why you are looking for

00:31:08

big solutions You should, as it were, in one

00:31:10

general plan and there, with one dialogue or

00:31:13

two, manage to tell how

00:31:15

it works. Well, here are some things I

00:31:18

managed to tell that were important to me

00:31:21

As an author, probably yes, that is,

00:31:23

we told some kind of Eco agenda and there

00:31:25

is a scene that was dear to me,

00:31:27

which actually doesn’t carry

00:31:28

any great dramatic

00:31:30

meaning, where they go there to explore Kolya,

00:31:33

it’s just such a passage scene in which

00:31:35

Alice is simply telling what a

00:31:39

cosmovenok is,

00:31:42

not an entertainment area, and this is a veterinary

00:31:45

clinic, this is the place in which they

00:31:47

restore earthly animals and, as it were,

00:31:50

restore the fauna of the earth and somehow

00:31:52

interact, transport these

00:31:54

animals to other planets, maybe

00:31:55

if they don’t survive here. That is, this is

00:31:57

just a signal, I managed to give a signal

00:32:00

that in the future they are concerned about

00:32:03

restoration Yes, and care, as it were

00:32:05

preoccupied with concern Sorry about the planet and

00:32:09

this is some kind of mission, too, and not just

00:32:12

some kind of idle entertainment, but

00:32:16

I left this episode because it’s important there.

00:32:18

But in general, when you kind of make such a

00:32:20

big movie in terms of timing, then

00:32:22

it’s all unfortunately additional

00:32:25

explanations because there were

00:32:26

additional explanations and a dark

00:32:28

future, they were even filmed scenes.

00:32:31

And it was important to me that they

00:32:33

explained how it works. How

00:32:36

people live. Why do they live like this? What happens?

00:32:38

Well, unfortunately, they often go

00:32:41

under the knife later because let’s so let's get to the

00:32:45

main thing, guys. Well, you have to

00:32:47

choose. Yes, because everyone still

00:32:49

writes how long the timing is, and

00:32:51

by the way, it looks like it's in one go, but it would have

00:32:53

worked out in general for three and

00:32:54

three seconds per hour. Well, here's a question for you,

00:32:58

how really probably already

00:32:59

an expert, you can say an expert in

00:33:00

science fiction, because even now the

00:33:02

film distributor’s bulletin showed

00:33:04

statistics of the best starts and the first

00:33:07

two places are occupied by the invasion of attraction,

00:33:10

but the film 100 Years of Tom

00:33:12

Ahead showed, well, I don’t know,

00:33:16

it showed a good Start in your opinion, or

00:33:19

were there expectations? Well, this is the most

00:33:22

for the director, this is generally the most

00:33:24

painful question. I don’t have an

00:33:26

adequate answer for: Can I now

00:33:29

change into a producer in a second and give

00:33:32

you a calm, try to objective

00:33:34

answer, of course This is a good Start

00:33:37

because, as you said, Domestic

00:33:39

Science Fiction had a better Start two films have

00:33:40

attraction and invasion, so the top three

00:33:43

leaders of Russian science fiction are

00:33:45

all our films; moreover, this Start

00:33:47

assumes that we will reach figures that

00:33:50

I hope will be record-breaking for Russian

00:33:52

science fiction. That is, if we are talking about the

00:33:53

genre, we can’t. Well, that is, how Than with

00:33:55

what we measure yes, if we measure, that is, there are

00:33:59

several categories, there are New Year's

00:34:02

films, they collect, in principle, if you

00:34:04

watch much more than films not

00:34:06

released on New Year's, so these are two

00:34:08

separate games, after all, regardless

00:34:10

of the quality, and Yes, and well,

00:34:12

let's have quality now Let's even take it out of

00:34:14

brackets, let's take pure statistics, there are

00:34:16

films that are released on New Year's Day and they

00:34:17

collect different numbers than those that are

00:34:19

released not on New Year's, we are in the second

00:34:21

category. This is the first. Second, we are

00:34:24

in the category of the adventure fan genre.

00:34:29

I have already said that it differs from the

00:34:32

fairy tale genre because it’s like a fairy tale is a

00:34:35

very clear, reliable signal and a huge thank you to the

00:34:39

creators and everyone involved in

00:34:41

Cheburashka, this genre lives and seems to

00:34:45

breathe because Cheburashka did its

00:34:47

job, it’s like a film that

00:34:49

everyone liked, a gigantic

00:34:51

number of people watched it and now as soon as we

00:34:53

we see a Russian fairy tale We believe that this is a

00:34:55

good

00:34:58

fantasy It’s good we don’t know yet

00:35:00

We haven’t had such experience except for films of the

00:35:03

attraction of invasion I’m now just by the

00:35:05

number of viewers even because everything

00:35:06

else is outside

00:35:08

the discussion, it’s kind of below That is, these are

00:35:11

unsuccessful experiments who, on the contrary, told

00:35:13

the viewer that there is no need to do Russian

00:35:15

science fiction Well, as an example, I can and

00:35:17

can take any other genre. Are there

00:35:19

many people collecting Russian thrillers?

00:35:22

Well, probably not, respectively, if

00:35:25

we were releasing a thriller SD

00:35:28

at 300 on the first weekend Well, probably we would

00:35:31

we opened the champagne, so we are now

00:35:33

watching this, I, as a producer, am telling you, we are

00:35:36

now looking very optimistically into

00:35:38

the future, we have a big weekend ahead of us, we have an

00:35:40

excellent sundress, we see it. Well, according to

00:35:42

all the indicators that exist,

00:35:44

including

00:35:45

critics, there are, of course, dissatisfied ones. But that

00:35:48

’s normal, but it’s still criticism also

00:35:50

high, but according to all the parameters of

00:35:53

this genre, we are still in the top and

00:35:56

we hope that everything will be

00:35:59

fine. Well, then how will

00:36:02

another question go, while not as a director,

00:36:04

but as a producer in the Telegram channel,

00:36:06

they paid attention to the poster and trailer and

00:36:09

also He’s the one complaining about the fact that the film

00:36:12

could have earned much more if the

00:36:17

advertising had been more spectacular or effective. How do you generally feel about

00:36:20

criticism of the poster? And by the way, the trailer when

00:36:22

it came out was also very, very

00:36:24

negative, that is, they do not reflect

00:36:26

what the film really is like. as a result, the film

00:36:28

came out on the screen and you understand the film is just

00:36:30

very complex. The canvas is, well, I

00:36:32

was generally afraid. Even when we enter the film market,

00:36:40

unfortunately, this is a complex, very complex

00:36:43

design, it is very difficult to reflect it in the

00:36:45

trailer, how good is the poster or

00:36:48

trailer? We, unfortunately, will never know

00:36:50

because we So we can say about any of our

00:36:52

films, I mean, what if there was

00:36:54

another? Another advertising company, the film

00:36:56

would have grossed more or

00:36:59

Well, probably we can only

00:37:01

say with confidence that Cheburashka ca

00:37:03

n’t be collected anymore, and this is probably the right

00:37:06

choice, so it’s hard for me to judge. I see

00:37:09

these comments I’m not sure that this is

00:37:12

connected with the trailer

00:37:14

because, well, it’s also strange when a person writes

00:37:18

that I categorically did not want to go after seeing the

00:37:21

trailer. I don’t think this is a

00:37:24

question of the

00:37:26

trailer. The question is what a person expects from the

00:37:29

genre. I watched, for example, a review of a

00:37:31

video review of a person who liked

00:37:34

the movie and then he was very he writes amazingly

00:37:37

about how he liked the

00:37:39

computer graphics and how horrified he

00:37:41

felt seeing the computer graphics in the

00:37:43

trailer, so this is the same

00:37:45

computer graphics, these are the same

00:37:47

shots, I can’t explain it. This

00:37:49

means that he came to the cinema and was

00:37:51

captivated by the story. He saw it on

00:37:53

the screen and was delighted by it. But in the trailer

00:37:56

I can just

00:37:58

say that it’s the same footage, he

00:38:00

thinks that we changed something there, but

00:38:02

that’s not the case. So I think that this is an

00:38:05

expectation; now I’ll touch on an important topic,

00:38:08

my favorite one.

00:38:11

There was a Q&A after all the premieres and everyone said my

00:38:14

favorite phrase and on the Internet there’s

00:38:17

no shame in it either, so I want to appeal to

00:38:20

everyone who hears us. I don’t understand why

00:38:23

we’re generally ashamed. It seems to me that

00:38:25

for some reason we’re ashamed. Well, this

00:38:28

some part of our mentality

00:38:30

feels shame and we experience special shame

00:38:33

when we go into big

00:38:35

fantasy genres we are ashamed We

00:38:38

are afraid we experience a feeling of fear and

00:38:40

shame when we see an advertising campaign for

00:38:43

something very

00:38:44

ambitious And when we see and understand

00:38:47

that

00:38:48

Phew the

00:38:50

jumping comments are joyful sincere

00:38:52

people who really liked the film

00:38:54

tell us not to be ashamed I say guys Well

00:38:57

thank God Well I don’t understand this

00:39:01

Therefore the reaction to it seems to me to be a

00:39:05

reaction to this a reaction of fear to the fact that we wo

00:39:08

n’t succeed because we are going into

00:39:11

too ambitious Not ours authentic

00:39:15

genre and now it’s very funny, my favorite thing to

00:39:18

watch now on

00:39:20

YouTube under the trailer because

00:39:23

now there’s just such a direct integration going on,

00:39:25

as if it’s clear there that the haters

00:39:27

who haven’t seen the movie continue to

00:39:31

say that we won’t go to see it, but

00:39:32

people who went to it will integrate there the

00:39:34

first weekend and they just say Yes,

00:39:36

go Yes, they say Yes,

00:39:38

we won’t go, they say Yes, go and so They are

00:39:42

fighting there and it seems to me that this, well, you can see this

00:39:46

fear, as if you can see this fear. I

00:39:49

can’t blame anyone for this. Unfortunately,

00:39:51

I don’t know. what does this have to do with very well?

00:39:53

By the way, you answer

00:39:56

all the haters very fearlessly. I was also present at the

00:39:58

Q&A at First on Moskovsky and I remember that

00:40:02

you were struck by

00:40:03

the question. When they approached you like this

00:40:08

Alexander This is your first film You

00:40:09

said first of all This is not the first film But

00:40:12

further you added But this is the first big

00:40:14

film That's why you consider it the first

00:40:17

big film And the previous one was small

00:40:20

Well, first of all, did the first one work out then

00:40:23

yes I think

00:40:25

look somehow It’s just my thing with

00:40:29

films I like the film Partner I

00:40:32

think it worked out Why didn’t I I call

00:40:34

it a big film because for me,

00:40:36

in fact, from the point of view of

00:40:37

energy consumption, Partner took even more energy from

00:40:40

me because I made it for 4 years

00:40:43

and there were much fewer resources there than

00:40:46

for the film 100 Years of Tomorrow and in

00:40:48

many ways this fell on me personally and in

00:40:52

general it was a very complex

00:40:54

production. Not to mention the fact that it

00:40:56

would be a complex film with a very small

00:40:58

budget. I treat it as my

00:41:01

own debut and this is a debut in a

00:41:03

feature film and I am pleased. I am

00:41:06

pleased that it is very a complete movie in

00:41:09

its own experimental genre,

00:41:11

that is, it

00:41:13

really is from a marketing point of view,

00:41:16

it is not very clear for whom and Probably

00:41:19

this is the problem of this film because for

00:41:21

children it is adult for adults it is for

00:41:23

children this is a fact I made a huge amount on it

00:41:28

It helped me a lot in my further

00:41:30

just developing understanding, but

00:41:33

nevertheless it is a solid film in its genre of

00:41:35

comedy, it is funny and a plus because

00:41:38

it is such an experiment I am very arrogant

00:41:40

somehow Well, yes, yes, I made mistakes there,

00:41:42

but I am absolutely not ashamed of it I In general, I’m

00:41:44

proud of this film, the only thing I

00:41:47

clearly understand with the film

00:41:49

Partner is that it kind of makes his debut an

00:41:54

experiment, not so real. It

00:41:58

seems to me so artistic, like a

00:41:59

mature work of art, it’s

00:42:01

like one real mistake that

00:42:04

I probably wouldn’t have made if I was a little

00:42:06

older there older or more experienced, it

00:42:09

lies in the fact that the technology with

00:42:11

which we made this computer

00:42:13

child, I believed in it. But I didn’t understand

00:42:17

that we were not ready, and it seems to me that

00:42:19

we were able to do it in the cinema because

00:42:21

in the cinema you kind of get used to this

00:42:23

attraction and basically you watch

00:42:25

the story, it doesn’t throw you out of it, it

00:42:27

seems to me, but we didn’t get past the promo

00:42:29

company at all because in the promo

00:42:32

company separately in this trailer it

00:42:34

looked super creepy what

00:42:37

should I have done today if I was filming

00:42:39

Partner I would did a test and said

00:42:40

guys, we’re not ready, let’s not

00:42:42

do this. What would you do if there

00:42:45

was a time machine now, would you

00:42:47

go back there and change it, or vice versa,

00:42:49

would you leave this error because it

00:42:51

affected someone like you right now

00:42:55

snya is

00:42:57

that snya is a movie for me, it’s very

00:42:59

important and I’m grateful to everyone who

00:43:02

took part in this film and I’m really

00:43:04

proud of this film. Well, that is, I’m

00:43:06

sad that it had such a

00:43:08

fate at the box office and it seems to me that it

00:43:11

influenced a lot because if the

00:43:13

film's distribution had been more successful and the film

00:43:16

would not have been forgotten so quickly But in general it's a

00:43:19

great film Look, maybe

00:43:21

someone will reconsider after 100 years of military air defense the

00:43:23

latest

00:43:26

issue is also being discussed very actively the

00:43:28

first action scenes someone wrote in the

00:43:31

reviews that they are too cruel and this is

00:43:33

not at all 6 plus are

00:43:36

cruel

00:43:39

Ah, a debatable question again, I can be

00:43:42

equal to the

00:43:43

majority, I see that most people are

00:43:45

glad that their children get great

00:43:48

pleasure from this film, and children

00:43:50

Well, I saw this in examples and I saw this on Q&A

00:43:52

I saw children there aged

00:43:55

78 9 years old They watch the film with great

00:43:58

interest somewhere they are scared somewhere

00:44:00

I think that being scared at the moment when

00:44:05

the villain is scary is a normal phenomenon

00:44:08

in the cinema I am very afraid that this could

00:44:11

be because I grew up myself Well, that is, I was a

00:44:13

child watched my film Jurassic Park

00:44:16

I was very worried about whether

00:44:18

the dinosaur eats children I’m not saying that I watched

00:44:20

Starship Troopers as a child And I really

00:44:22

liked it, it’s not for children, it’s not a film

00:44:24

for family viewing But no matter, there are a

00:44:25

large number of films that I was

00:44:27

seriously very worried about and that’s why the

00:44:30

pirates in the film are scary and that’s why the mouth is

00:44:33

scary. I don’t see anything there that

00:44:36

would cause injuries in children. Let’s call it that

00:44:39

or something, I don’t know,

00:44:42

then they’ll sleep badly. There’s nothing like

00:44:44

that there, but I wanted Pirates to

00:44:48

be serious. danger and it seems to me that

00:44:50

this is part of the genre and the fight, I will answer this way. I do

00:44:54

n’t see anything in this film that

00:44:57

cannot be shown to children over 6 years old,

00:44:59

especially since children over 6 years old go with their

00:45:01

parents and the parents are there for this and

00:45:03

they exist, firstly they can don’t

00:45:05

go to this movie Well, in general, and

00:45:07

secondly, they can explain some

00:45:10

things that children don’t understand, it

00:45:12

seems to me, and fights are normal. In this

00:45:14

genre, there is nothing overly cruel, and

00:45:17

kissing is normal and they are very

00:45:20

chaste And this is a film about love and I do

00:45:23

n’t see anything wrong with the fact that

00:45:25

high school students

00:45:27

really

00:45:28

kiss sensually in this

00:45:30

film And what’s wrong with the fact that children

00:45:33

will watch it I don’t see it either Well, I mean, I

00:45:35

really don’t see it, I think that

00:45:37

well how why shouldn’t they, again,

00:45:40

if you remember the very strange things there, the

00:45:41

villains are very scary and about the swallow we

00:45:45

wanted I wanted to ask the swallow is

00:45:47

really scary and it’s scary

00:45:49

not so much not so much his appearance

00:45:50

as his rational thinking and the fact

00:45:53

that he is bald but by the way Yura Borisov is

00:45:55

always bald I don’t even remember In what way,

00:45:58

but not always scary Yes, how did I come up with this image,

00:46:00

listen, it’s difficult, I came up with nothing,

00:46:04

nothing was easy, I didn’t come up with it for a long time,

00:46:06

we searched, swallowed, I understood two things,

00:46:09

How do I remember now the first one,

00:46:13

these cool ones were invented, I was looking for

00:46:15

unique abilities thank God

00:46:19

Deadpool hasn’t come out yet and they didn’t tell us that

00:46:21

we stole them from Deadpool, we didn’t have time to steal them.

00:46:24

But I really liked the story that

00:46:26

he had physical strength, I understood that

00:46:28

a funny guy is a fighter, he’s a person

00:46:30

with physical strength, physical

00:46:32

swords, pistols, and so on.

00:46:34

there should be a contrast to him and he

00:46:36

should have been visually defenseless, in

00:46:40

the sense of either half naked,

00:46:43

barefoot, not having any armor, not

00:46:46

having any

00:46:47

physical ammunition, well, some kind of weapon,

00:46:49

accordingly, I understood that he

00:46:51

should not touch anyone, and he

00:46:54

should win with his intellect, yes

00:46:57

into another person and it just seemed to me that

00:46:59

very immediately the idea of

00:47:02

this choreographic attraction where

00:47:03

he captures other characters

00:47:05

just seemed to me that it was cool and unusual

00:47:08

and you can build an action on it when

00:47:11

you don’t have 100 million dollars for action, you

00:47:14

can build on it through invention

00:47:16

interesting choreography, unexpected

00:47:18

turns in the scenes and it was a success, this is a

00:47:20

cool thing. This is what I understood as a kind of

00:47:22

defenseless half-preparedness with

00:47:27

abilities and not with one’s physical

00:47:29

strength, and then we looked for very different

00:47:31

artists of different characters, did large

00:47:33

auditions, I didn’t understand exactly how he should

00:47:36

move, say exist, and so

00:47:39

on and so on I really really didn’t

00:47:40

understand, we did very large auditions

00:47:42

here with a huge number of artists and

00:47:46

nothing suited me, so I specifically

00:47:48

did these auditions without very specific

00:47:49

tasks because I myself, I couldn’t, the

00:47:51

casting director asked me how he

00:47:53

should behave gulp I say Yes, I

00:47:54

have no idea. I need the body of an

00:47:57

artist who can simply push this through

00:48:00

his body and offer

00:48:02

something. There were very cool offers

00:48:04

from different artists. I won’t

00:48:05

give the last name now, but none of them

00:48:07

hit me and then I called Yura Well,

00:48:09

since I know Yura, I

00:48:13

thought something would work with him and we tried with him

00:48:15

and it worked out and the last

00:48:18

question yes Alexander Petrov is still

00:48:20

really very charismatic here,

00:48:22

villainous evil and a mouthful and a merry fellow, the most

00:48:26

amazing thing is that

00:48:28

Alexander Petrov’s reputation today is like the most

00:48:30

popular actor is also dictated by the division of the

00:48:33

audience into those who are crazy and those who are

00:48:36

still envious Well, or let’s say

00:48:39

they react jealously somehow But in this

00:48:41

case everyone agreed how it happened

00:48:43

that you offered Alexander Petrov

00:48:45

the best role in his career At the

00:48:47

moment Oh God how nice how nice

00:48:50

I

00:48:51

agree listen it turned out so I

00:48:57

I know Sasha’s laugh I’ve been friends with him for a long time we’ve

00:49:00

been working with him for many years our whole

00:49:02

careers are very closely connected with each

00:49:04

other And we not only seem to cooperate with each

00:49:07

other successfully but we’re really

00:49:09

friends and I know Sasha’s laughter, I’ve heard it

00:49:12

many times, this super contagious

00:49:14

incredible laughter, and it’s different, that’s why it

00:49:17

all started with a very simple

00:49:19

intuitive idea. And I think it’s

00:49:21

very important to listen to intuition, she

00:49:23

was the first to think Who is this funny guy,

00:49:25

this person is very funny and Sasha A

00:49:28

funny guy, well, no not to mention the fact

00:49:31

that he is a brilliant artist I sincerely I

00:49:36

say hello to everyone

00:49:38

who for some reason seems to be trying to

00:49:41

prick Sasha all the time on social networks because it

00:49:43

seems to me that I’m not ashamed to

00:49:46

say this now, it’s envy I was just with

00:49:49

Sasha in Rostov Well this It’s like

00:49:52

the Beatles arrived. We were at school, the

00:49:54

kids were running. They were screaming and running in a crowd.

00:49:57

I’ve just never seen anything like this. I think it’s

00:50:00

something like this, and then some of these

00:50:02

people come from those who have

00:50:05

envy in them and try to prick Sasha for some reason.

00:50:08

but Sasha is generally one of the few

00:50:11

people who is not just an

00:50:12

outstanding artist, he is also

00:50:15

perhaps the only

00:50:16

superstar, super movie star in Russia,

00:50:18

I mean that he is more than a good

00:50:21

actor, that is, he is also a person who

00:50:23

carries more than this, a whole kind of

00:50:26

movie nonsense, he therefore, it evokes such

00:50:30

emotions in everyone, they are borderline, they seem to range

00:50:33

from admiration to, well, to

00:50:37

some kind of hatred, but this is already I’m already saying this is already the

00:50:39

problems of people in general, extreme fanatical

00:50:41

Emotions are not problems of Sasha, but of

00:50:45

specific people and he Well, I I I honestly, I always

00:50:48

dream of working with him and here it was

00:50:51

important to me. The only thing that was important to

00:50:53

me was that he wanted to play it

00:50:57

and I think the material was important to him and it’s

00:51:01

very cool that when he read

00:51:02

the script he called me and he did

00:51:05

n’t say a word to me talked about the role of a funny guy, I

00:51:08

appreciated it and really remembered it because

00:51:10

he told me everything about what

00:51:12

cool characters what a cool plot how

00:51:14

it would all be I remember he told me that

00:51:16

I have a teenage niece it would be

00:51:18

so cool for teenagers of this genre No

00:51:21

you don’t you see, and I was so amazed that

00:51:23

unni the word I say and a merry fellow Yes,

00:51:25

we will do this He says Yes, in general,

00:51:27

we will figure it out there, that is, he was amazed by this

00:51:30

This story, this material and he wanted to

00:51:34

participate in it And then Sanya has such

00:51:36

incredible abilities. I mean

00:51:39

that there is only one thing Well, what are we what what it

00:51:41

seems to me it was important to find and we

00:51:44

found it almost immediately, it’s like a

00:51:46

working technology because the role of a

00:51:48

trickster role is based on madness, you

00:51:51

can’t set it, come set

00:51:54

the task, you know. Let’s do it a little here. Keep

00:51:57

it quiet. Well then that is, that is, you kind

00:52:01

of rely on the state of the artist in

00:52:04

which he himself comes How he

00:52:06

feels And then you are certain Well, you should

00:52:08

feel with him the invisible

00:52:11

handles of certain volumes there and also the frequencies

00:52:13

that you turn So most often it

00:52:16

was like this there is a certain the task at the stage is that

00:52:18

Sasha knows the text, we start playing,

00:52:21

he plays the first take, then there is

00:52:23

some significant number of

00:52:24

corrections, wait, come on, this is a

00:52:26

different degree here, and so on, the second take,

00:52:28

Sasha plays perfectly, it’s just straight

00:52:32

and then I say, and now the acting and

00:52:35

he says I understand and then he just

00:52:37

lets all these things go And this is important considering

00:52:41

that Sasha is a super cool artist, but he’s

00:52:43

like any artist, he’s worried and it

00:52:45

was very important to let him know that the whole

00:52:47

task has been completed, you’re done, all

00:52:49

responsibility has been removed from you, come out and

00:52:52

Courage How do you As you want simply and he

00:52:55

went out and curated Well, probably some of

00:52:57

this courage was not included in the editing there, yes because

00:53:00

but but where he

00:53:02

let himself go, the most

00:53:04

amazing thing began. I can’t tell you exactly right now,

00:53:06

but if we someday we will

00:53:07

analyze the movie frame by frame. I can

00:53:09

say for sure that these are the coolest things from the

00:53:11

merry fellow, these were moments that

00:53:14

were not planned, this is that this is an

00:53:16

actor’s double, there was also improvisation in words,

00:53:19

of course, and there was improvisation in

00:53:21

words and there was cool improvisation and Well there

00:53:25

was a lot of interesting things, I’m generally

00:53:27

open to improvisation and I naturally

00:53:30

think that this is generally the case if you took a bunch of

00:53:32

artists. And I, in general, my task is I took a

00:53:36

bunch of artists in my film, then of course it’s

00:53:38

strange not to listen to them and not to accept

00:53:40

their offers, you You have you have every right

00:53:42

as a director to filter them out,

00:53:44

you can always refuse, but you should always

00:53:46

sort of hear because they are Well, only a

00:53:50

super director listens to super

00:53:52

artists Thank you very much Alexander

00:53:53

Thank you very much And that’s where

00:53:55

we end Thank you

Description:

Интервью с Александром Андрющенко. Про отсылки, Марвел, плагиат, оценки критиков, Александра Петрова и Юру Борисова.

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Критикуем? Сто лет тому вперед / Вопросы к режиссёру"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.