background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24"

input logo icon
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Начало эфира
0:57
Роль Навального* в российской политике
6:25
Чем власти выгодна новость о гибели политика?
10:35
Как изменится политический ландшафт России?
18:43
О чем говорят попытки власти препятствовать акциям памяти?
20:40
Покупайте книги на shop.diletant.media!
21:14
Юлия Навальная призвала ЕС не признавать результаты российских выборов
23:20
Предложение Михаила Ходорковского** вписать в бюллетень имя Навального
30:57
Что-то зависит от того, как избиратели проголосуют на выборах?
34:06
Реально ли кандидату собрать подписи «по-тихому»?
42:00
Пропаганда может саморазоблачаться
46:20
Критика предвыборных роликов Слуцкого, Харитонова, Даванкова
51:24
Эмиграция – акт политического самоубийства
Similar videos from our catalog
|

Similar videos from our catalog

Страны ЕС признают Палестину. Ордер на арест Нетаньяху. Пархоменко*: Особое мнение @sparkhom
53:35

Страны ЕС признают Палестину. Ордер на арест Нетаньяху. Пархоменко*: Особое мнение @sparkhom

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Утренний разворот. Удар по Чернигову. F-16 для Украины. Осечкин*, Роменский* и Майерс / 21.08.23
3:13:00

Утренний разворот. Удар по Чернигову. F-16 для Украины. Осечкин*, Роменский* и Майерс / 21.08.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Дмитрий Колезев*: Особое мнение / 20.05.24 @Kolezev
56:50

Дмитрий Колезев*: Особое мнение / 20.05.24 @Kolezev

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Противоречит Конституции, но все же! / Калой Ахильгов / Быль о правах // 03.08.23
55:50

Противоречит Конституции, но все же! / Калой Ахильгов / Быль о правах // 03.08.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Василий Полонский / #СлухайЭхо // 10.11.2022 @polonskii
57:00

Василий Полонский / #СлухайЭхо // 10.11.2022 @polonskii

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Утренний разворот. Левиев*, Венедиктов**, Муртазин. Максим Курников и Ирина Баблоян // 14.07.23
3:01:30

Утренний разворот. Левиев*, Венедиктов**, Муртазин. Максим Курников и Ирина Баблоян // 14.07.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Евгений Ройзман* в перерыве между заседаниями суда / @sotavision
4:33

Евгений Ройзман* в перерыве между заседаниями суда / @sotavision

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Ирина Якутенко - COVID-19 вернулся / Утренний Разворот // 23.07.2022
16:02

Ирина Якутенко - COVID-19 вернулся / Утренний Разворот // 23.07.2022

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Война в Израиле. Троица с Кириллом. Митрополит Тихон. Кураев: Утренний разворот. 16.10.23
36:55

Война в Израиле. Троица с Кириллом. Митрополит Тихон. Кураев: Утренний разворот. 16.10.23

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Назначение Белоусова. Покушение на Фицо. Путина в Китае / Венедиктов* / Будем наблюдать // 18.05.24
1:57:50

Назначение Белоусова. Покушение на Фицо. Путина в Китае / Венедиктов* / Будем наблюдать // 18.05.24

Channel: Живой Гвоздь
Video tags
|

Video tags

венедиктов
пастухов
живой гвоздь
политика
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:21
[music]
00:00:41
Tuesday, February 20 at the microphone Nikita
00:00:44
Vasilenko Greetings to all our
00:00:46
viewers and listeners, this Youtube channel is a
00:00:48
living nail and in its place the program
00:00:51
Special opinion today Special opinion of
00:00:52
political scientist Alexander to Hello,
00:00:58
very
00:01:00
kind Unfortunately Yes, unfortunately,
00:01:03
the news now does not have any something
00:01:05
positive Alexey Navalny died in
00:01:07
prison and therefore Alexander I’m very
00:01:09
interested to know from you exactly when
00:01:11
Alexey Navalny became a noticeable
00:01:13
political
00:01:15
figure for you, well, you know, Alexey and I
00:01:19
knew each other quite a long time ago, that is, Well,
00:01:22
probably the listeners know that I
00:01:24
once worked in the apparatus of uniting
00:01:28
Apple and the Yablo faction in the early 2000s,
00:01:31
around the same time,
00:01:33
when I was finishing work at Apple, around the same time,
00:01:36
in Apple, adj then
00:01:38
Alexey Navalny, at the same time,
00:01:40
Ilya Yashin came somewhere, this is the beginning of the
00:01:42
2000s, then we didn’t intersect, well, sort of
00:01:44
So I saw him, that is, at that time I was already
00:01:47
leaving Yablo, it would have been the end of the year, but now, as it
00:01:51
were, a few years later It was
00:01:58
the end, he wrote to me So he suggested that we
00:02:03
meet there to talk and we
00:02:05
met for the first time, it was a
00:02:09
cafe near conservatory Well, there,
00:02:13
just below the Mayakovsky Theater, there is a summer
00:02:15
cafe somewhere around the month In June,
00:02:18
well, just about elections about life,
00:02:21
he told me that he remembers my performance,
00:02:23
how I left the apple There and so on,
00:02:25
then you he was right in everything, well, in the
00:02:28
future, we periodically,
00:02:30
he consulted with me on regions
00:02:32
on regional elections on some
00:02:34
things related to strategy There
00:02:36
and so on Well, we saw each other quite regularly and
00:02:37
communicated in all
00:02:39
subsequent years Well, how many of them were there,
00:02:42
that is,
00:02:43
well, somewhere around the year of the year, probably before
00:02:45
the twentieth,
00:02:48
in the twentieth,
00:02:50
let’s say, all relations
00:02:55
deteriorated somewhat for the reason that we
00:02:57
had very strong views then on
00:03:00
Covid, then there was a well-known concept
00:03:03
that was written to Navalny there Sonin
00:03:06
there Nikola Ploshch people are extinguishing there are strict
00:03:09
lockdowns and so on I took a different
00:03:11
position and then our position diverged
00:03:13
over the summer on amendments to the Constitution, I
00:03:16
thought that it was necessary to participate and
00:03:18
vote against Well, Alexey Nava then,
00:03:21
in fact, a
00:03:23
boycott and everything else,
00:03:26
by the way, when here he died, began to look at
00:03:29
the census
00:03:31
of Zhere, and so on, so I saw that the
00:03:33
last time we corresponded with him,
00:03:35
we communicated. It was July of the year. That is, I
00:03:38
then, we were arguing
00:03:41
about the Constitution, they moved, I thought that it was right,
00:03:45
and so on, the matter was somehow discussed then it
00:03:48
was another story departure
00:03:50
migration arrest everything else There and so
00:03:52
on I, after my birth, am
00:04:01
in the opinion of participation in the campaign for the
00:04:04
nomination of the President of the Russian
00:04:07
Federation Well, this is a cumulative story
00:04:10
Navalny, of course, became a Federal
00:04:12
politician, I don’t think right away it seems to me that
00:04:14
this
00:04:17
was the point for him at the
00:04:20
beginning of the year the company to vote for the other
00:04:28
party is the rules of the game, that is, it means
00:04:32
to form a political agenda
00:04:34
followed by all the others. The
00:04:35
eleventh year was the first one that
00:04:37
followed this agenda; it was in the birth of
00:04:40
Donya. Yes, the eleventh year was the
00:04:42
only case in all the years when the
00:04:45
agenda of the Federal election
00:04:46
campaign was not determined the opposition authorities
00:04:49
Well, the young people don’t remember But probably people who are
00:04:51
older remember that in the eleventh
00:04:53
year if we take the newspaper of the time
00:04:56
apple leaflets from a fair Russia from the
00:04:59
Communist Party of the Russian Federation and even the Liberal Democratic Party we will find in all of them
00:05:02
all kinds of derivatives from
00:05:06
there I vote for any other party in
00:05:08
of different types, that is, and this gave the effect
00:05:10
when everyone together conducts some kind of
00:05:12
coordinated campaign, each in their own way.
00:05:13
But the idea alone gives a
00:05:15
commutative effect. It would be unusually
00:05:18
little for Russian elections of mutual
00:05:20
criticism, which means any criticism of Chernukh, it
00:05:23
demolitizes. People don’t want to watch voters
00:05:25
in this to figure it out they say Oh, they’d
00:05:27
better not go at all, that the company
00:05:30
didn’t have much of a struggle, but there was a
00:05:34
lot of joint campaigning for something else. And it was the most successful
00:05:36
company in all the years, and by the way, a very
00:05:37
revealing story, that is, the more
00:05:39
you fight each other with a friend and share,
00:05:42
roughly speaking, the same Voters,
00:05:44
the fewer of them remain because now it’s easy to
00:05:46
demoralize people in this situation,
00:05:54
even candidates who have no chance,
00:05:57
the question arises: Why is this being done?
00:05:59
It’s for the sole purpose of negatively
00:06:15
demoralizing the
00:06:16
turnout of independent Voters and their own.
00:06:19
they will come and so They will come according to the list and
00:06:22
here I would like to express, in my opinion, an
00:06:24
idea for some reason, that
00:06:26
is, this is what happened yes During these days, what is
00:06:30
its meaning for the authorities in the World Cup? Why is this
00:06:32
beneficial for the authorities because there are a
00:06:35
lot of arguments that Yes, indeed, the
00:06:36
presidential company is very
00:06:38
bad news, it really
00:06:41
spoils the overall picture. In general, it
00:06:43
turns out to be a fly in the ointment. And
00:06:45
in general, the aftertaste of the elections will remain
00:06:48
very heavy, that is, any article about
00:06:49
the elections in Russia until the fourth year will
00:06:52
begin there with one phrase that in the
00:06:54
course of the company Yes, one
00:06:57
of one of the beaks of the Russian opposition died
00:07:00
and this is no longer possible to
00:07:02
beg from history with any ink from history the company in this
00:07:03
sense, as if its reputation for history,
00:07:05
it will be like this and this is how well, and it seems like
00:07:09
nothing in this is really not good for the authorities,
00:07:11
well, in general, probably It would be
00:07:13
reasonable to understand that many people have
00:07:15
long dreamed of getting rid of him, but
00:07:17
probably they would like to do it
00:07:18
later Yes, it would be more profitable for them if it
00:07:20
were after the elections, that is,
00:07:21
conspiracy theories are already starting, yes, that is, there
00:07:23
ex-performers are not an excess, and so on, so
00:07:25
in the World Cup, what
00:07:28
could actually be the benefit even in conditions
00:07:30
where it harms the reputation of the
00:07:31
elections? It seems to me that the only benefit
00:07:34
that the authorities received is Here Well, besides
00:07:36
there, in someone’s personal place, this
00:07:39
an attempt to demoralize people, that is,
00:07:42
after these two years of almost a
00:07:45
special operation, society is so
00:07:48
tired, society is so accustomed to
00:07:51
negative news that it would seem that
00:07:53
nothing can give back, give
00:07:55
back to people, the desire wants to
00:07:57
fight for something, and suddenly we saw in at the
00:07:59
end of last year, this accumulated
00:08:01
desire for people to participate, the desire to express
00:08:04
their opinion, it broke through in the VG. Yes, at the
00:08:06
beginning, suddenly there was a tsova that became
00:08:09
famous there before, no one
00:08:11
knows, because the very fact of the movement, a
00:08:12
person is ready to move forward and we are ready
00:08:14
to hold it right away, hundreds of thousands of people
00:08:16
are signing up then Nadezhdin’s company and
00:08:18
this inspiration that suddenly
00:08:21
began to appear to people in people out of
00:08:23
nowhere, it was as if it was frozen,
00:08:25
so society had the feeling that
00:08:27
society was
00:08:28
waking up, in the conditions of a feeling
00:08:30
when society was waking up, a story about
00:08:33
when suddenly one of the people who
00:08:37
was a symbol of another points of view Yes, and
00:08:39
the struggle for a different point of view
00:08:41
has been dying there for the last 10-plus years and we see
00:08:44
how many people are really in a shock
00:08:46
situation and an attempt means replacing
00:08:51
this enthusiasm with despondency with depression Yes, a
00:08:53
feeling of hopelessness that nothing
00:08:55
can be done here and we immediately see how
00:08:57
huge the number of representatives there
00:08:59
on
00:09:00
migration Russia is cursed there is no future and
00:09:03
so on, and in this sense they find themselves in a
00:09:05
surprisingly lami propagandist, that is,
00:09:09
that is, in this way they say that
00:09:10
everything must be folded, everything is
00:09:12
pointless, nothing matters, that
00:09:14
is, there may be a direct connection with the
00:09:16
company NSO and Nadezhdin and the death of
00:09:18
Navalny, that is, literally, of course,
00:09:20
we can hit the conspiracy theories, but
00:09:23
we can extinguish this thing that you called
00:09:28
society waking up. I think let’s say maybe this
00:09:31
was not in direct What is called something of
00:09:33
a plan, but from the point of view of the
00:09:35
social effect, it seems to me that
00:09:37
this is noticeable That is, when something suddenly
00:09:40
begins to develop in a way that is not where you
00:09:43
want, you need to interrupt the negative
00:09:45
process for you with another process of the
00:09:48
opposite direction Yes, you need to
00:09:50
psychologically suppress people Yes, the
00:09:52
story of psychological suppression would also be
00:09:54
connected
00:09:58
with the need to extinguish this protest
00:10:00
wave Yes which had been going on since 11, it was
00:10:04
hit very hard by Crimea and
00:10:06
Nemtsov’s murder hit to the end because in
00:10:07
fact it was the last major public
00:10:09
action. It was a march in memory of Tso Yes, which was
00:10:11
originally supposed to be a spring march
00:10:13
where
00:10:14
the Leader is, of course, but in
00:10:18
general from the point of view of political
00:10:20
consequences That there is, if you think about what
00:10:21
could be the meaning, it could be like this, I’m not
00:10:24
saying that it was necessarily intended, but
00:10:27
in fact, now this
00:10:29
seems to me, if this happens, it will be the
00:10:31
worst consequence of the death of Alexei
00:10:33
Navalny. How will the political
00:10:35
landscape of Russia change after the death of Navalny?
00:10:37
Will it be possible? even Yulia Navalnaya will become,
00:10:39
for example, a new unifying figure for the
00:10:40
Russian opposition. Well, in fact, it
00:10:43
seems to me that there is no need to exaggerate here a little, let’s
00:10:44
say from the point of view of the
00:10:47
internal situation, it has long been
00:10:49
very squeezed and severely limited from the
00:10:52
point of view of the possibility of political
00:10:54
competition in this sense, probably no
00:10:56
illusions who, as it were, does not have
00:10:58
the opportunity to speak out, we
00:10:59
still have the opportunity not only when
00:11:01
you died while you are alive, you
00:11:03
can still express your point of view,
00:11:07
but it is clear
00:11:11
that it is far from ideal,
00:11:14
so returning to this situation, the
00:11:16
dream books of Alexei Navalny
00:11:17
Everyone was excluded from political life
00:11:18
quite a long time ago, that is,
00:11:22
he himself was. Can I immediately clarify? Do we need to
00:11:24
separate Navalny’s supporters from
00:11:26
Navalny himself, that is, his comrades-in-arms?
00:11:29
I think that here it still makes
00:11:30
sense to speak
00:11:32
as a certain One because in fact, the
00:11:36
last company when Navalny
00:11:38
actively took part and had an
00:11:40
impact. This
00:11:43
was the year in Moscow, then there was a decline because
00:11:47
already in the first half of the year there was a decline,
00:11:48
poisoning occurred already during the decline, it
00:11:50
was visible and by the drop
00:11:52
in attendance, which means
00:11:55
broadcasts of Navalny’s media holding,
00:11:57
it was visible there a drop there donations
00:12:00
as far as the employees of the
00:12:02
headquarters there reported there and so on and at that moment,
00:12:04
this is the story with the establishment, that
00:12:05
is, the government. It is always at war
00:12:08
with a border war, that is, Navalny already
00:12:09
had a social decline But for but for the
00:12:11
authorities, the UNO was an allergen Yes And this
00:12:14
story with the departure moved everything into a
00:12:16
New phase, a symbolic phase, and this is
00:12:19
what happened next in the future, as
00:12:21
if the regional structures there were destroyed quite quickly,
00:12:23
someone
00:12:25
emigrated, someone was arrested, someone
00:12:28
left politics
00:12:30
from the point of view of the media agenda,
00:12:32
the last ones there For more than a year, Navalny was
00:12:35
practically absent from the information flow.
00:12:37
That
00:12:38
is, his supporters there, FBK, tried to
00:12:41
periodically do something, but it is quite
00:12:43
obvious that That there was nothing comparable in
00:12:45
scope to the previous investigations, yes There
00:12:48
were no informational reasons. That is,
00:12:50
gradually they are getting bigger and bigger Healy
00:12:52
there, the audience was falling, the influence
00:12:54
of information was
00:12:56
falling, it was obvious that the main reason was
00:12:58
Tom Navalny himself could no longer act as
00:13:00
such a maker, being as if
00:13:02
isolated. Yes, he wrote something from us and from
00:13:05
society in the media sphere.
00:13:08
But they and what was before, the difference
00:13:10
was huge, colossal And alone,
00:13:11
without him, his team turned out to be
00:13:13
completely incapable of fighting anything,
00:13:15
nothing bright, they did not produce anything bright
00:13:17
in this sense, they were
00:13:18
constantly losing information, and recently,
00:13:20
their role, in my opinion, was quite
00:13:24
low and in many ways they themselves made
00:13:26
a lot of mistakes, these are endless conflicts
00:13:31
political with people, it’s unclear why,
00:13:33
in order to destroy all
00:13:37
potential comrades there and remain the
00:13:39
only ones in some niche There and so
00:13:40
on, wars with journalists, wars with
00:13:42
some other social activists are
00:13:43
endless There and so
00:13:45
Far away, their opponents believed that
00:13:48
Navalny would now leave prison
00:13:50
when his term comes Or, on the contrary, I don’t
00:13:54
know you, he’s slandering the
00:13:57
order, there was a lot of talk, there was a
00:13:59
lot of speculation that
00:14:01
Navalny will fire everyone, yes There and so
00:14:04
on, let’s leave all this out of the equation, that
00:14:07
is, the fact is that from the point of view of the
00:14:09
internal situation, the last couple there
00:14:11
for years, Navalny’s structures had practically no influence on
00:14:13
him, mainly they
00:14:15
influenced the information wars there
00:14:18
within political migration, but they
00:14:21
really didn’t influence the situation inside, and they also had very little influence on
00:14:23
this presidential campaign.
00:14:25
That is, in fact, there
00:14:27
was only one noticeable event there:
00:14:29
when Yulia Navalnaya went and signed
00:14:30
for Nadezhdino, I want to remind you that before
00:14:32
this there were public statements by Zhdanov and
00:14:34
Milov that there was no need to do this,
00:14:36
Milov generally threatened with some kind of
00:14:37
visas for those who signed, and
00:14:39
so on, then she then Yulia Navalnaya
00:14:41
went and signed and it seems how everyone
00:14:42
pretended that everything was fine, everything was
00:14:44
fine and also began to support
00:14:45
Nadezhdin’s subscription company, that is, in
00:14:48
this sense, but what about Nadezh Navalny,
00:14:52
who was isolated and was almost
00:14:54
silent there, is now silent forever But in
00:14:57
this sense, but from the point of view of reality
00:14:59
the situation in the country, this is not such a
00:15:00
significant change, this is more of a
00:15:02
psychological blow. Yes, this is precisely a
00:15:04
moral blow to people
00:15:06
we sympathize with, people
00:15:09
who were committed to change
00:15:12
because, roughly speaking,
00:15:14
they could have hopes that we
00:15:16
will endure it, as if everything will return at another
00:15:19
stage yes What That the main thing would be to survive Yes And
00:15:21
these blows to these hopes
00:15:23
were dealt, of course, a very strong blow, but
00:15:25
this now seems to me to be a question of how the authorities are
00:15:29
on the line. It seems to me that If
00:15:31
we talk about the consequences of this story,
00:15:33
I already said the first the consequence is
00:15:34
that this is an attempt to extinguish the
00:15:38
hopes that people have, and
00:15:40
secondly, it seems to me that the consequences
00:15:41
will be polar, radicalization will occur,
00:15:43
that is, on the one hand,
00:15:45
probably part of the opposition is angry with the radicals
00:15:46
because and as if when you
00:15:49
behave as harshly as possible When you
00:15:52
destroy people, but it’s naive to think that
00:15:54
all the morning Yes, someone will think that you know
00:15:58
no shores, then we, we, the same, that
00:16:00
is, roughly speaking, If there had not been a
00:16:02
tough struggle there in Sava Russia
00:16:04
against the People’s Will there, and so on,
00:16:05
we could there were never Bolsheviks, that
00:16:07
is, in this sense, it is early
00:16:09
return of inadequate harsh
00:16:11
actions against the opposition.
00:16:13
Unfortunately, that radicalization often leads to the fact
00:16:15
that in the future it itself does not
00:16:16
choose methods and the fact that part of
00:16:18
the opposition is radicalized as a result.
00:16:19
I think these risks exist this is this this is the
00:16:22
first direction, that is,
00:16:23
radicalization, but does it mean that I
00:16:25
will transfer these risks to Russia, that is,
00:16:27
the opposition
00:16:31
can move them, radicals only together,
00:16:34
they radicals separately cannot, this is
00:16:37
the first consequence, the second, when we are
00:16:38
talking about the authorities themselves, here it seems to me that there are
00:16:41
two polar scenarios, scenario one
00:16:44
this will increase fears. And so over the last
00:16:48
couple of years, everything has been constantly being done there to
00:16:50
scare people as much as possible,
00:16:52
to scare officials. All these
00:16:54
stories when a deputy spoke
00:16:56
somewhere, a wave
00:16:58
of indignation begins, a wave of indignation begins. Oh, he’s not a Patriot, that means he does
00:17:00
n’t support our army. Ah he
00:17:02
criticizes someone he publicly apologizes to the unfortunate person
00:17:04
or something else or leaves for a
00:17:06
special operation zone There and so on
00:17:08
how many stories like this over the last
00:17:10
couple of years there or there it’s a party someone doesn’t
00:17:13
grieve enough someone doesn’t
00:17:14
say anything publicly But he doesn’t say anything doesn’t
00:17:16
talk about the special pit, it means he’s a traitor
00:17:18
Yes, it means he’s still thinking something wrong
00:17:19
There and so on That is, these
00:17:21
endless attempts at Witch Hunt
00:17:23
This is a story about intimidation and and so, of
00:17:26
course, we can suggest that
00:17:29
Navalny’s death can also be perceived as
00:17:30
part of this intimidation campaign, the
00:17:32
first option which is possible, yes, that
00:17:34
is, to intimidate the elite even more, yes, that is,
00:17:37
to show that if we don’t stand on ceremony with him, then
00:17:40
we wo
00:17:42
n’t stand on ceremony with you, but at the same time, this
00:17:44
may also have a second consequence:
00:17:46
it can be any fear, on the one hand, on
00:17:49
the other hand, any check can be driven
00:17:51
into a corner when they are afraid even the devil is, roughly
00:17:54
speaking, the guards can by the fact of
00:17:57
irritation
00:17:59
when there is nothing to lose, let’s
00:18:02
remember late Stalinism, let’s remember a
00:18:06
year ago how screwed up the old
00:18:08
Soviet Elite was Dana there was actually
00:18:11
afraid of the shadow Yes, that’s it wrote a denunciation they were not
00:18:15
capable of taking What steps but suddenly
00:18:16
there is a threat of coming to power and these
00:18:19
zapuzau means bureaucrats
00:18:27
turn out to be The first is the escalation of fear
00:18:30
and its even greater number of internal
00:18:33
Taboos, as if something might not happen there, and so
00:18:36
on, and such is the very pupation within the
00:18:38
elite on the other hand, when a
00:18:41
certain edge comes, this can lead And to the
00:18:42
reverse process. Well, we are
00:18:45
now observing that it is stopping attempts to remember and
00:18:48
lay flowers at the monuments to the victims of
00:18:50
political repression. We see that,
00:18:53
again, Navalny’s mothers do not give up their
00:18:55
son’s body, which means that this speaks of the
00:18:57
dissipation of power or, on the contrary, what they are
00:18:59
as cynical as possible and they know what they
00:19:01
got themselves into, no they are cynical. They behave the same way they
00:19:04
always behaved before, that
00:19:05
is, the government in recent years, even before, did
00:19:08
not really like independent
00:19:09
social activity, and there has been for the last
00:19:11
couple of years any attempt to demonstrate
00:19:14
some kind of independence in expressing
00:19:17
their positions immediately ends with an
00:19:19
attempt to hit hands, it doesn’t matter, it
00:19:21
doesn’t matter what it is and it doesn’t matter for what
00:19:23
reason where you are bringing flowers. If you
00:19:25
are carrying them without consent, then you are already
00:19:27
doing something imagine, that is, everything
00:19:29
must be clearly according to the rules according to the
00:19:30
regulations, and so on so she
00:19:32
fought for this for many years with the
00:19:34
Nemtsov memorial, but now she is also fighting with the
00:19:36
flowers that people bring in cities to
00:19:38
monuments to victims of political
00:19:39
repression, they remembered Alexei
00:19:40
Navalny. That is, of course she will
00:19:42
do the same thing further, that is, she
00:19:44
tried to react as harshly as possible there
00:19:46
for any actions there of
00:19:48
relatives of the mobilized There and so
00:19:50
on, well, let’s remember the hub and other
00:19:54
public stories there Khabarovsk
00:19:55
protest let’s remember now the history of the Bashkirs moment I
00:19:58
’m waiting for Mac Stu’s reaction so that it’s
00:20:01
not because they’re afraid that people
00:20:03
there about Around this one, everything is often
00:20:06
not important allow the Domino principle, what if
00:20:08
this is possible for the Torah, that they can also Yes, they
00:20:11
will also come out there and so on Therefore, yes, in
00:20:14
this sense, the government acts
00:20:16
extremely rationally and cynically, I
00:20:18
like it according to the domino principle, here is
00:20:20
this theory How can you embrace the raon of
00:20:27
this broadcast of ours Put like and In
00:20:30
addition, be sure to subscribe to the
00:20:32
Telegram channel of Alexandra Kne Eva,
00:20:33
which bears the name of the author and there are
00:20:36
many, many interesting analytical
00:20:38
materials. But in addition, let me remind you that you can
00:20:39
support the live projects of the Amateur
00:20:41
by going to the shd Media store, many
00:20:44
different lots of books. You can, for example,
00:20:46
sign up for a paper subscription to
00:20:47
historical magazines Amateur Well, in
00:20:50
addition, do not forget that the various lots
00:20:52
that we strongly recommend today
00:20:54
are the book by Joshua Rubenstein, the last
00:20:55
days of Stalin Joshua Rubenstein is an outstanding
00:20:59
American specialist in Russian
00:21:00
Eurasian studies and this is a
00:21:03
fascinating story about the months before and
00:21:05
after the death of Stalin and how they
00:21:07
changed the course of history of the 20th century So this
00:21:10
purchase will help support our project
00:21:12
Well, we are moving on and the general through
00:21:14
line of our conversation
00:21:16
today with Alexander Prince is
00:21:17
the elections and today Yulia Navalnaya,
00:21:20
speaking before the Foreign
00:21:23
Affairs Committee of the Council of the European
00:21:25
Union, called not to recognize the
00:21:28
presidential elections of the Russian Federation Federation, the
00:21:29
results of the presidential elections in the Russian
00:21:31
Federation and I have a question: What does it mean not to
00:21:33
recognize this mechanism? How does not recognize
00:21:35
elections work? Well, to be honest,
00:21:38
No, it doesn’t work very well. Why
00:21:41
Because Well, let’s say, well, let’s
00:21:44
remember the recent one in Venezuela. There was
00:21:46
an attempt not to recognize the election. in the
00:21:49
last elections of Nicolas Madura and,
00:21:51
accordingly, there According to the Constitution of
00:21:54
Venezuela, if the pressure is not on the president,
00:21:57
then it means the acting
00:21:58
speaker of the parliament is Guaido Uh-huh Well, some
00:22:01
countries have recognized Guaido as interim
00:22:03
president Although he did not control anything within the country and
00:22:06
it ended in
00:22:08
Nothing In the end, in fact, all of
00:22:09
this was disavowed
00:22:13
in emigration in the States But still there they are
00:22:17
forced to reckon with reality and
00:22:19
recognize Madura.
00:22:21
Therefore, public actions are possible,
00:22:24
statements from various organizations are very possible there
00:22:26
that can recognize the
00:22:28
past elections there for various reasons as not
00:22:31
legitimate there, unfair there and
00:22:33
so on, for sure it will most likely be
00:22:35
this is an inevitable situation, but the
00:22:37
next step arises.
00:22:39
And if you do not recognize the authorities, then
00:22:43
how will you negotiate there, the
00:22:45
embassy of the border There and so on, who
00:22:47
then is the bearer of power in this situation, that is,
00:22:49
well, the situation here seems to me to be
00:22:50
quite dead-end. That is, I think that
00:22:52
no one seriously not ready After May 7th,
00:22:55
do not recognize the current Russian government
00:22:57
Well, this is not this, this is not this, this is
00:22:59
unrealistic, this simply closes all
00:23:00
options. Therefore, I think that on the other
00:23:03
hand there will probably be some kind of public
00:23:05
declarations, but no one will still
00:23:08
refuse to consider the Russian
00:23:10
Government as the Russian government that is, in this
00:23:11
sense, nothing
00:23:13
will change by and large; well, here again
00:23:17
many questions arise during the protest
00:23:18
voting in Russia and one of the
00:23:20
proposals was from Mikhail
00:23:21
Khodorkovsky to
00:23:23
write Navalny’s name on the ballot paper. And this may be
00:23:25
somehow noticeable to the authorities no no and how
00:23:29
is it that when we talk about
00:23:30
strategies for elections there are, as it were, two
00:23:32
dimensions, the first dimension is
00:23:34
how to cause damage, say, to the candidate with
00:23:37
whom you are fighting from the point of view of
00:23:39
behavior. So, when we look at
00:23:41
the protocols on elections, there are two phrases in the law
00:23:43
the number of Voters
00:23:46
who took part in the elections is the turnout the
00:23:49
turnout is calculated by the number of those people
00:23:51
who signed the ballot, here the
00:23:55
turnout is read by those who received the ballot,
00:23:56
this includes everyone
00:23:58
there; it was dropped;
00:24:08
differs from those who took
00:24:10
part in the elections by the difference in those who
00:24:11
took the ballot, that is, accordingly
00:24:13
If you take it away, it reduces the turnout
00:24:16
this is this, let’s say it doesn’t affect the turnout,
00:24:19
but the percentage is calculated from those who
00:24:22
cast away the ballot, that is,
00:24:24
you don’t pay for the percentage Ute No this is if you took away
00:24:31
the principle on what the bare are
00:24:34
considered those to Omit If you did not
00:24:37
omit it even about not dreaming of the victory
00:24:41
made sha
00:24:43
which is Meaningless that is Poly in such a
00:24:48
general ballot you are on the layout of the
00:24:56
candidate those ballots omitted in
00:24:58
including
00:25:00
invalid What is an
00:25:01
invalid ballot
00:25:02
invalid a ballot for which
00:25:04
it is impossible to establish for whom the person
00:25:06
voted, there are two options, either there
00:25:08
are no marks at all. That is, all the checkboxes are
00:25:11
empty, you throw a blank ballot about
00:25:12
invalid, or you put more than
00:25:14
one cross there.
00:25:17
Well, from the point of view of not being
00:25:20
tempted in some way to calculate all this,
00:25:21
it’s better to put crosses on everyone,
00:25:23
then mark more than one, the ballot is
00:25:26
invalid
00:25:28
in this case, it is still considered Well,
00:25:30
well, simple. So it turns out
00:25:33
that the base candidate receives fewer
00:25:37
votes and his percentage still
00:25:38
decreases.
00:25:40
And if you just write something on the ballot - then there is a
00:25:43
bad curse word,
00:25:44
for example, or someone is entered at the
00:25:49
bottom. If you do not put any marks in
00:25:52
the box next to anyone, this
00:25:54
ballot is invalid, but there is such a
00:25:57
thing,
00:25:58
if it issues a blank ballot if the
00:26:01
inscriptions are written at the bottom, this does not
00:26:03
affect anything, it only affects the marks in
00:26:04
squares, so if a blank
00:26:06
ballot is issued, then it is
00:26:08
invalid and there is a Temptation, what is it
00:26:11
like, if you use a ballot
00:26:12
or put a few ticks on it,
00:26:14
you can’t do anything with it, it’s already spoiled Yes,
00:26:16
it’s already invalid in principle But a
00:26:18
blank ballot with no marks
00:26:21
can be put any mark and then it
00:26:24
doesn’t matter what is written there Put the curse of the lock
00:26:26
against Putin’s words and he will be
00:26:29
Tim for Putin at one time there were tic
00:26:32
stories in de year when in the
00:26:34
presidential elections it means there are such spreads it
00:26:37
means the advice in quotes is smart,
00:26:40
actually harmful when there is a grandmother puts
00:26:42
a tick to Zyuganov and writes mate in
00:26:45
a box to Putin and it turns out that two
00:26:48
boxes already have marks, but it
00:26:50
really doesn’t matter that there is
00:26:53
some mark, that’s why in the blank
00:26:56
ballot of Nava and someone else, not putting a mark
00:26:59
is a very big risk that
00:27:01
just when sorting, put an extra
00:27:03
tick in front of that candidate Who
00:27:05
you don’t like at all, but what’s
00:27:07
written there Well, no one except the unfortunate
00:27:10
members of the commission will read this, they won’t read this They don’t care about
00:27:12
that, they see
00:27:14
that it’s just an extra bunch, no one
00:27:17
will see it or recognize it, I’ll believe it former
00:27:20
member of the election
00:27:26
commission Chava Nobody ever considers this anymore,
00:27:29
then it’s all destroyed
00:27:30
after some time, that is, it’s just
00:27:32
thrown into the atmosphere of your efforts
00:27:35
What is called and at the same time spoiling
00:27:37
ballots as a strategy it’s
00:27:39
ineffective why it’s very difficult let’s
00:27:41
say when the column was against everyone with
00:27:43
her there is no need to explain anything to anyone
00:27:44
people understand against everyone means I am
00:27:45
against everyone in order to Explain
00:27:48
the meaning of the bulletin it is necessary to read a
00:27:50
small lecture Although for minutes people
00:27:53
don’t understand this it has never worked
00:27:56
so btu they are really the same thing
00:27:59
in this In this case, it turns out to be
00:28:01
about
00:28:03
1%, that is, to bet on a strategy
00:28:06
that is obviously complex and unpopular,
00:28:08
this obviously dooms oneself to what
00:28:10
he says to you. Well, you called for it. And you are
00:28:13
1%;
00:28:16
the story about voting for any other
00:28:18
candidate, first of all, is much more effective and simpler here. it is impossible
00:28:20
to prove whether they are effective or not because there are
00:28:23
no options, in this sense,
00:28:24
from the point of view of the image on our influence, the
00:28:28
strategy is the simplest and most understandable
00:28:30
because there is no need to explain anything extra
00:28:32
for anyone except Yes, and
00:28:35
then the percentage of this candidate decreases for
00:28:37
everyone else there rat simply different
00:28:39
proportions, so the history of prescribing would
00:28:41
look like some kind of stupidity, it
00:28:44
could be in other countries it would be
00:28:45
different, let’s say the USA for example the USA, there is a
00:28:49
different legal culture in principle,
00:28:50
you can enter a
00:28:52
candidate from the
00:28:56
request
00:28:58
there is no option, so it will just be what is
00:29:01
called forces thrown to the wind
00:29:03
that Moreover, these ballots will not affect anything,
00:29:05
if there are no checkmarks in
00:29:06
the boxes, they can be turned into
00:29:08
bte with someone else, so that you
00:29:12
don’t write down there or back there.
00:29:14
Therefore, from a strategic point of view,
00:29:16
Navalny himself, by the way, called for this
00:29:18
because you understood very well the most
00:29:22
effective strategy, especially in
00:29:24
Marina elections, when it is important that the
00:29:26
candidate is semi-mo,
00:29:28
that is, less than 50% of the vote for any
00:29:30
other summer, you can also just here I
00:29:33
explain that there is no point in public
00:29:35
leaders betting on this strategy
00:29:37
since you are on your own later
00:29:38
discredits because it will lead to a
00:29:40
low result, by the way, at one time,
00:29:42
when this was also the eleventh year, when
00:29:44
Navalny voted to vote for any
00:29:46
other party, then why the hell is anyone
00:29:47
who remembers? Yes, that means some of our representatives
00:29:50
mean our public
00:29:52
thought that this is how cool it means we’re there, that
00:29:55
means we’ll advertise what
00:29:57
This is a piglet, so what effect? ​​There
00:29:59
wasn’t any, it was a media effect in the
00:30:01
first place. About what kind of media effect was it
00:30:04
more in a beaker? it’s that they promoted each
00:30:06
other
00:30:07
as they didn’t know and don’t know.
00:30:09
Because according to the results of the protocols for the
00:30:10
elections of that year, the most a high percentage of
00:30:12
valid ballots was there as in the
00:30:14
same regions where it was always there
00:30:16
Chukotka Jewish Autonomous Region where there has never
00:30:20
been any naha no democrats in the region ever since and
00:30:22
where spoiling ballots or voting
00:30:25
against everyone there before would always be
00:30:27
associated with poor living conditions
00:30:31
had nothing to do with any strategies, and in large cities where
00:30:33
the company was allegedly there Moscow
00:30:36
St. Petersburg, the percentage was low there. So
00:30:38
it remained, it didn’t affect anything
00:30:40
at all, that is, not a
00:30:42
single one proven by facts with
00:30:45
historical records, whenever at least one the company on
00:30:48
ballots gave no effect, we have no effect
00:30:51
even in those years when it is believed that there
00:30:52
was no falsification and now in
00:30:54
general the US is talking about this, you have a higher
00:30:56
class article for the Forbes publication it is about the
00:31:00
scenarios of the current company further
00:31:02
scenarios I have a lot of questions I hope
00:31:04
we are at least part We’ll have time to sort it out. But first
00:31:06
of all, I’d like to forward the question from
00:31:10
our user Agnieszka Aleksandrov.
00:31:13
Alexander nod really believes that something
00:31:15
depends on how we
00:31:17
vote. I believe that our
00:31:20
actions affect our position with you
00:31:24
because well, act the only thing
00:31:27
you have, you understand That is, this is not
00:31:28
a guarantee Yes, but if you do nothing,
00:31:31
then definitely nothing will ever happen; the choice is
00:31:33
very simple, yes, or there is no chance at all,
00:31:35
never and for anything, they have
00:31:37
at least some, that is, and History
00:31:40
is from the point of view of success This is a story about
00:31:43
what someone tries to do there
00:31:45
once unsuccessfully twice unsuccessfully three times
00:31:47
unsuccessfully There and so on then and then
00:31:49
suddenly something works out in cases where
00:31:51
someone suddenly out of nowhere
00:31:53
comes to achieve success well in their life
00:31:55
it happens, of course, but there are very, very few of them,
00:31:57
after all, politics is a story about a
00:31:58
political marathon. This is a story about a
00:32:01
long struggle; seriously expect that you will
00:32:03
get something right away. Well, this is very
00:32:04
naive; this is youthful; this is some kind of maximalism; that is, this is what
00:32:09
sense, one must act first of all
00:32:11
on the basis of self-respect, based on faith in one’s
00:32:13
own
00:32:14
principles. Well, the rest, as
00:32:17
they say, do what you can and
00:32:19
what will be will be. Therefore, it seems to me that
00:32:21
this is the principle that can
00:32:22
work here, and everything else. Well, what’s
00:32:24
the point if you drive and do nothing
00:32:27
Well, why then do
00:32:29
you perform on the street at all? Why do you do anything to someone? A
00:32:30
What is your motivation? Well, if
00:32:32
you think that nothing can be done, you
00:32:34
are minding your own personal affairs
00:32:36
there, I don’t know flowers, grow something else,
00:32:38
why why why? where do you go to the public
00:32:40
you who are you trying to convince of something
00:32:42
you are trying to active people Bedi
00:32:44
so that they don’t do anything either
00:32:45
I’m even wondering how much after
00:32:47
yours
00:32:57
to my speeches the benefit of another doesn’t have
00:33:00
any special relationship it’s about this
00:33:03
general mood towards life this is a general
00:33:04
approach that is, in general, everything in
00:33:07
life is connected, that is, when people
00:33:09
succeed in something, when some
00:33:10
changes in something stimulate them, and
00:33:14
participation in something else, that is, in this sense,
00:33:16
if there is a social upsurge, then it
00:33:18
affects everything and on the economy and on
00:33:19
politics and so on, it’s a very long story, why is it important
00:33:22
for the development of the country?
00:33:27
Why is political competition important?
00:33:29
Because when people see the opportunity to
00:33:31
influence public life, it
00:33:33
also affects economic activity,
00:33:35
including I think Russians now more than
00:33:36
ever understood, especially since peace
00:33:39
gives peace a guarantee of peace a change of power
00:33:42
a certain guarantee That’s because
00:33:45
when you believe in yourself when you want something you
00:33:49
speak out on everything about the desire to
00:33:52
build a house there I don’t know about the desire
00:33:53
to open some kind of business something come up with
00:33:55
and when you when you are depressed then you do
00:33:57
n’t want anything at all and that is that and this
00:34:00
And your house will be abandoned there and everything
00:34:02
in the world will be bad but let’s move on to your
00:34:05
article for Forbes and I will allow myself to
00:34:08
quote you can assume that
00:34:09
if Nadezhdin collected signatures
00:34:11
quietly, his chances of getting on the ballot
00:34:14
would have been higher. In general, it’s really possible to collect
00:34:16
signatures quietly. Well, let’s say handing over
00:34:20
something that you collected. I think not.
00:34:22
In fact, it was possible to collect it. It
00:34:23
was just money, that is, well,
00:34:25
actually in fact, many things in life are
00:34:28
simply connected with a certain logical
00:34:31
sequence of certain
00:34:34
forced actions. And then they seem to
00:34:36
give birth to some kind of political reality,
00:34:37
that is, in fact, the entire mass
00:34:40
media company is reliable in collecting
00:34:42
signatures arose for one reason
00:34:44
because there was no money for signatures That
00:34:46
is, in reality, if there was money, it would be possible to
00:34:48
hire technologists
00:34:50
locally, it would be possible to pay people
00:34:51
who have been doing this for many years and
00:34:54
100,000 is at a price Lifting back, that
00:34:57
is, well, a political strategist does not need to explain
00:34:59
what it is, that is, it is not that
00:35:01
much, there is ue local networks there,
00:35:05
let’s say if, for example, there is some kind of
00:35:06
regional deputy, then I assure you
00:35:09
he has lists of supporters there for those who
00:35:10
come to the reception there will be several hundred
00:35:12
people Yes and so on That is,
00:35:13
the accumulation of a certain number of
00:35:14
people it allows all these problems
00:35:16
Nadya was forced to decide to go for an
00:35:18
active media company because
00:35:20
he had no money, and then it turned out that the
00:35:22
right time was in the right
00:35:25
place for the issue and then the snowball effect began,
00:35:28
that is, in this sense,
00:35:31
this is exactly what this publicity is exactly what
00:35:34
it became, let’s say a
00:35:37
historical fact of social life,
00:35:40
this of course forced the
00:35:42
authorities to react to everything that was
00:35:43
happening, and I think that before this,
00:35:46
a scenario was quite possible when there was hope
00:35:48
to register these and the granny there
00:35:50
Malinko and there would be something reminiscent of the
00:35:52
elections of past years when there were
00:35:54
many candidates and no competition But
00:35:56
since Nadezhdin appeared and
00:35:58
this powerful company arose around him,
00:36:00
registering him meant
00:36:01
prolonging this company for the
00:36:04
month and a half that remained there with the
00:36:07
results unknown, the ballots
00:36:09
arouse public enthusiasm Well, in
00:36:11
general, this threatened to get out of
00:36:13
control. This means that Nadya had to
00:36:15
shoot in any way. how to remove it if
00:36:18
all the other candidates did
00:36:20
not carry out a noticeable public collection of signatures. So we need to
00:36:22
remove them too, that is, in this way the
00:36:24
active company forced us to hope. As a result, we
00:36:27
finally went to the
00:36:29
ballot scenario with the four candidates that
00:36:31
we observe; this is an anti-record we
00:36:33
had in 2008 four candidates and
00:36:35
now four candidates are forced. I don’t
00:36:37
think that this was initially an inevitable
00:36:39
scenario; another was possible. But this is
00:36:41
exactly the kind of happening around
00:36:44
Nadezhdin. And this movement
00:36:47
left the authorities with no choice. Therefore, here’s an
00:36:48
example for you: When public activity
00:36:50
forces the authorities to go to some lengths then
00:36:53
the scenarios And by the way, what’s the plus?
00:36:57
What’s the minus? Well, you wrote that this is
00:36:59
generally a win-win situation for everyone that
00:37:00
Nadezhda is not allowed to participate in the elections Well, yes Well, in
00:37:04
principle, any situation in this life
00:37:05
always It has, as it were, different sides
00:37:07
because you need to look at everything analytically,
00:37:09
that is, what is the main minus of
00:37:12
four candidates, the minus is that
00:37:15
you will have iron control
00:37:17
because each candidate has
00:37:19
the ability to appoint observers,
00:37:21
so if Nadezhdin would be there, everyone else
00:37:23
would have more observers, now there are only
00:37:24
four candidates the situation in the regions is
00:37:27
very ambiguous, somewhere, let’s say,
00:37:30
political parties have living organizations
00:37:32
that are ready to guide people, and there are
00:37:33
regions, let’s say where where All the parks are under
00:37:35
the governor And what the heck, they will appoint
00:37:38
independent observers at the site,
00:37:40
yes, that is, they will rather play
00:37:42
giveaways there Therefore, here from the point of view of
00:37:44
control, a decrease in the number of
00:37:46
candidates This is bad, but from the point
00:37:49
of view of, let’s say, the symbolism of the results,
00:37:54
this is what we have now, well, some
00:37:55
chance Dat Why it gives because But
00:37:59
due to the fact that we have a very weak
00:38:00
candidate from the communists Kharitonov Uh-huh Well
00:38:03
age and image since he is a
00:38:05
peasant and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation has a city I would say this many
00:38:07
times yes the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is a city
00:38:09
party a long time ago therefore therefore an
00:38:11
elderly agrarian for a city party Well
00:38:13
this is somewhat strange to
00:38:16
put it mildly his company itself is obviously not
00:38:19
aimed at expansion the electorate is not
00:38:21
aimed in any way at the youth, well,
00:38:22
it is aimed at the electorate that was
00:38:24
communist 20 years ago and not today, it’s
00:38:27
very cathartic, some kind of patriarchal,
00:38:29
and so on, therefore the cadat is very weak. For the
00:38:32
first time in all these 30 years, there may be an
00:38:36
opportunity to get the second in the place of a
00:38:38
candidate no more conservative than the
00:38:41
government itself because the government would say
00:38:44
maybe we are wrong but who, if not us,
00:38:47
people want a tougher scenario
00:38:55
Nini not Kharitonov Slu or Davankov
00:38:59
Davankov a good chance precisely because
00:39:00
his company is as close as possible That’s just in
00:39:02
terms of rhetoric Nadezhdino and because
00:39:04
he still represents
00:39:06
the only
00:39:07
candidate of all the youth and the urban
00:39:10
intelligentsia, that is, we can say
00:39:12
that the removal of hopes for
00:39:23
consolidation because they put the
00:39:26
authorities in a completely different image
00:39:27
position, and that is, they will not
00:39:29
say that if not us Yes, then it
00:39:30
will be even worse No, the dream will still be
00:39:32
somewhat different and Vlasna too, well, you know,
00:39:34
it’s only people who don’t want to
00:39:37
understand what they say that everything is
00:39:39
black and white, it’s not like that, the authorities are
00:39:41
watching everything very closely, we
00:39:43
already said today, she everything
00:39:45
she does is very rational, she does it for a reason, and
00:39:46
there, to suppress simply means to drive into
00:39:50
depression, to deprive the possibility of control
00:39:52
there, to deprive the will to resist There and
00:39:54
so on, and she very carefully
00:39:55
looks at other points
00:39:58
of view in society, currently there is a
00:40:01
demand and ve what
00:40:06
there, the Russian authorities at the beginning of the
00:40:09
2000s reproduced the current Communist Party of the Russian Federation there, the
00:40:11
patriotic Soviet gin, for what
00:40:14
purpose did she do this, she did the goal
00:40:16
to grab self-knowledge, this is a
00:40:18
technological polytechnological
00:40:23
what is it that they
00:40:29
put themselves in the MTO and
00:40:31
Dali very much is the case, you know, the fil
00:40:37
arrives, says the VM
00:40:40
convinces political technology has become exactly
00:40:43
type of thinking that these myths that were
00:40:45
sowed as a polytechnological approach, they
00:40:47
became precisely an installation
00:40:55
of power, the more order in the
00:40:57
political field, the greater the effect
00:40:59
that the official himself becomes a consumer of the
00:41:03
same order that he approved, that
00:41:05
is, at the first stage you expel other
00:41:06
points of view at the second stage, you
00:41:08
fill the entire space with your own
00:41:10
press releases, paid for by
00:41:12
some kind of talking heads, then you
00:41:14
analyze them yourself and make sure how
00:41:17
right you are. It’s brilliant and it turns out to monitor
00:41:21
yourself, yes. That is, you
00:41:23
monopolize everything and then on the basis of this
00:41:24
you say, but I’m not wine such
00:41:27
moods and then you sincerely believe in it
00:41:30
Yes, this is how it works A vicious
00:41:32
circle turns out if there is a way out of it,
00:41:35
there is some way out when society does not
00:41:38
sleep and tries to do something
00:41:39
on its own and I must say that thank
00:41:41
God we live there after all not not in the
00:41:45
Great Patriotic War not in the seventies And in a situation
00:41:47
where there is a huge number of
00:41:49
information platforms to talk to the media, you
00:42:00
know, often people don’t understand what they
00:42:03
want until they
00:42:05
see it, that is, you need to understand
00:42:07
to feel the demand, you need to try
00:42:09
To reach people you need to look words
00:42:11
need to look for images because a person
00:42:15
may not know his attitude towards what at
00:42:17
that moment until he Uvi there
00:42:26
would be no progress but he always
00:42:29
rode a horse well oh the car is so
00:42:31
cool but but the person was not offered a
00:42:33
car until he didn’t know that he could ride by
00:42:35
car and if authoritative sources
00:42:37
say that it’s bad Here’s a car - This is a
00:42:38
bad car - It’s from an
00:42:40
onion It doesn’t matter at all
00:42:43
You know, if there are other options and a
00:42:47
person sees them and a
00:42:56
chamois Well, probably someone Maybe
00:42:58
knows there was such a thing Russian philosopher By the way, I
00:43:00
was one of his students back when I was
00:43:02
studying at Moscow State University in the nineties.
00:43:05
Sergeevich died a long time ago. And he was such a
00:43:09
culturologist, he was
00:43:11
always very interested in How
00:43:14
society is changing, the Reverse Rhone
00:43:16
of propaganda, and so he analyzed, say,
00:43:19
How the Soviet Propaganda
00:43:21
itself Rusha, let’s say Soviet films, as
00:43:23
we know, are very ST tion content
00:43:26
that could be shown in
00:43:28
cinemas. So what if, say,
00:43:30
the film was allowed to be released in the Soviet Union, there
00:43:31
should be a decaying West showing the
00:43:33
moral decay of capitalism There and
00:43:35
so on, what it looked like, here
00:43:36
they show, let’s say they take away the film
00:43:37
for example, about the collapse of the bourgeois family
00:43:40
Yes, everything is bad at home there, that means the children don’t
00:43:42
like the mother there, the wife means she’s cheating on
00:43:45
her husband There, and so on, everyone quarreled, the
00:43:46
family fell apart, it means such
00:43:49
bourgeois decomposition, the son left in his
00:43:51
car, the daughter left in her car, the wife
00:43:53
left for in his car and the husband went to his
00:43:55
parents in Vila, which means that the
00:43:58
Soviet man sees. He doesn’t see the crisis of
00:44:02
the family, he sees. Well, everyone has their own
00:44:04
car. Therefore, in this sense, Propaganda,
00:44:08
that is, it’s impossible to completely replace
00:44:10
life, and what
00:44:12
seems to be, let’s say, a way of manipulation
00:44:16
in reality, it often works for self-destruction,
00:44:17
that is, well, it’s impossible
00:44:20
to live in complete isolation from the world when it is
00:44:22
completely different, that
00:44:25
is,
00:44:32
relatives, friends of the Armed Forces move around,
00:44:35
everyone understands what quality
00:44:36
the goods are actually there, and so on, well, it’s
00:44:39
pointless to say when people know
00:44:41
what’s in in life, in fact, this is not so Yes,
00:44:43
I don’t know very well
00:44:46
where the best telephones and TVs are, where the
00:44:49
best cars are, but I know you can Milli of
00:44:52
stories, what a cool auto industry, Well,
00:44:56
this will really change the attitude towards our
00:44:58
cars,
00:44:59
no, I’m very afraid that those who want to
00:45:03
change all this this approach, they will listen to
00:45:05
your answer and simply turn off the Internet and
00:45:08
close the borders so that no one sees how
00:45:10
it is possible it is impossible. This is in
00:45:15
Why Well,
00:45:18
because North Korea is the
00:45:24
Koryo era has come, it just
00:45:27
never came to it Yeah, that is, you know,
00:45:30
you can stay for some- then the stages of
00:45:32
evolution Just if you If you
00:45:33
have moved to the next level, there are
00:45:36
such
00:45:39
islands,
00:45:40
Lord, no name cheat in the outer
00:45:44
ocean of the Similan Islands, this one here still
00:45:47
lives there, the treasure
00:45:50
that has not arrived, the sale of the social
00:45:52
system Yes, they have been declared as nature reserves for
00:45:54
several people there because
00:45:56
it is forbidden to land so as not to spread the
00:45:58
infection there so that those people do not die there, there is the
00:46:00
Stone Age there, people are not
00:46:03
ozeni from the song of the same name. Well, why is
00:46:06
it there because there artificially
00:46:07
cut off contacts with the outside world, it
00:46:09
simply never came to another melting
00:46:12
revolutionary stage If you’ve already moved on,
00:46:15
well, that inspires some optimism.
00:46:18
However, I wanted to return to the elections and to the
00:46:22
campaign propaganda that the
00:46:24
candidates are distributing. You, including on your
00:46:25
Telegram channel which bears your name
00:46:28
Alexander Kynev, share videos of
00:46:30
Davankova, Kharitonov, Slutsky and
00:46:35
here with me The next question arose is
00:46:37
what we see in these videos, it
00:46:40
evokes a feeling of what is now
00:46:41
called cringe and how do you think the
00:46:45
candidates, realizing that they are not fighting for
00:46:47
first place, how they position themselves
00:46:50
and how they could position themselves to
00:46:52
do it in a less
00:46:54
cringe way Well, I think the fact that this is a cringe -
00:46:57
it just means that they have
00:46:59
no motivation to achieve Success,
00:47:01
they are a giveaway. Because if a candidate is
00:47:04
seriously trying to achieve something, he
00:47:06
will never in his life. It’s such a shame
00:47:08
to post that we see this and
00:47:11
an attempt, as if not to gain too
00:47:13
much, but in any case, with
00:47:15
Kharitonov, absolutely exactly, that is,
00:47:16
as for No, well, you can not gain a lot but at the
00:47:19
same time not lose face, but you’re just
00:47:20
looking at the same Kharitonov, this is just
00:47:22
something terrible Well, Well, here Well, here’s
00:47:24
a company Well,
00:47:26
this year’s company really is something completely
00:47:30
incomparable with anything else, I don’t remember a single
00:47:32
company when there was
00:47:34
a crossbow for that much, that is, for example, sternum
00:47:37
fought sincerely Yes, sternum had a lot of
00:47:39
creativity, there were quite interesting videos
00:47:41
and that’s it now, well, it’s just heaven and
00:47:44
earth as far as Slutsky is concerned. Well, it
00:47:46
seems to me that
00:47:48
when his
00:47:50
videos Iya
00:47:54
die no matter how, that is, to put a lot of
00:47:57
pressure on Lutsky’s personality means
00:48:00
to overshadow Zhirinovsky, but without
00:48:02
Zhirinovsky it’s clear that there’s
00:48:05
nothing special to offer, that’s why they
00:48:08
apparently chose the path of being as
00:48:10
reminiscent as possible about Vla Volfovich there,
00:48:12
well, there’s really nothing to talk about. This VI is not a coach, not a
00:48:16
coach from the inevitability. What is
00:48:19
called there is
00:48:21
n’t really any other option, so they could probably launch
00:48:25
the company M. Only that is, talk not
00:48:28
about the candidate but
00:48:29
there, but translate it into the problem there,
00:48:32
let’s say, for example, Slutsk for there
00:48:34
something that means there, for example, there is
00:48:36
business protection there, or they have
00:48:38
a lot of private small initiatives there,
00:48:39
maternity capital There and so on, they
00:48:42
could have gone down this path, but for
00:48:44
some reason they decided there again,
00:48:47
it means that’s all they can do throw in the fact that
00:48:50
Zhirinovsky is eternal There and so on Nuna
00:48:53
doesn’t think that this is a technologist’s
00:48:56
mistake, that’s what concerns
00:48:58
Davankov’s company there Yes, it’s not bad, but
00:49:01
you just need to understand one thing when I
00:49:04
understand very well when voters are
00:49:07
very unhappy they say that Well,
00:49:09
why doesn’t he finish there it was already time
00:49:11
to be bolder. Why doesn’t he talk about it? He doesn’t
00:49:12
talk about it there, and so on, you know,
00:49:15
it’s important to always maintain a sense of proportion
00:49:17
because we all understand the
00:49:19
conditions we live in and work. You can, of course,
00:49:22
come out and say everything you think about
00:49:24
everyone
00:49:26
And after this is not to do anything, on principle,
00:49:30
let us measure
00:49:32
the possibilities, let’s
00:49:34
say your desire to be realistic in this
00:49:38
sense, that is, in general,
00:49:41
politics is long and exhausting, you
00:49:54
need a ring to track every step,
00:49:57
sometimes you can do nothing but at the
00:50:00
same time not make a mistake, you will end up
00:50:02
winning, and we have enough such examples
00:50:04
a lot And to demand everything at once,
00:50:06
but this is some kind of maximalism, but that’s not how
00:50:09
politics works - it’s not about love,
00:50:12
it’s not about marriage, politics is about a large
00:50:15
number of some big small
00:50:17
compromises
00:50:18
and attempts, using different steps, to
00:50:21
influence one to influence another
00:50:23
influence the third There and so on in
00:50:25
this way, try to make life
00:50:27
change in the direction that is
00:50:29
beneficial to you When you stop buying a
00:50:30
product because it has become bad Yes and
00:50:32
talk about this Well, sooner or later it
00:50:34
affects the manufacturer either he
00:50:36
goes bankrupt or he in the end it
00:50:38
starts to work better There and so on
00:50:40
When you support candidates
00:50:41
who are close to you And there are a lot of you
00:50:44
gradually the role of Kanda begins to grow and
00:50:46
then Maybe you will not be two but
00:50:48
three then already and you can choose from two
00:50:50
close ones the one who speaks even
00:50:52
more close things and so on That is, So
00:50:54
gradually, step by step Step by step
00:50:56
Step by step, but you can’t have everything and
00:50:59
everything at once, so it seems to me that
00:51:01
if we don’t want to, well, just
00:51:04
drive ourselves into a corner and
00:51:06
say that everything is lost, nothing there is no
00:51:08
need to do that, that is, well, we
00:51:10
still have no other option. Well, to be
00:51:11
realistic, try to do what we
00:51:13
can do. Well, how could it be otherwise?
00:51:15
Well, we have some options that exist. So
00:51:17
we have options to get into
00:51:20
some kind of... then another fairy-tale world, but there is no
00:51:22
this world, unfortunately deep, and
00:51:24
by the way, well, they’re knocked out and they just give up
00:51:27
and leave,
00:51:29
well, let’s say there are also very different people there, there
00:51:33
are people who have no problems with
00:51:35
money and they leave where they are better and
00:51:37
more comfortable and that’s it that is, well, if
00:51:38
now you can buy yourself an apartment
00:51:40
in Spain there in Italy and France Well, as they
00:51:42
say, the flag is in his hands
00:51:44
NOC someone has a profession and he
00:51:46
believes that he will find a job, but there are a
00:51:48
lot of people who have neither housing
00:51:50
nor there will never be a job Who doesn’t know
00:51:52
the language and is unlikely to learn it there when he’s
00:51:54
already over 50 There and so on So let’s say
00:51:57
you were a municipal deputy here,
00:51:59
you influenced something, you could hold some
00:52:01
public campaigns there, so
00:52:03
everyone put pressure on you how bad everything is, you have to
00:52:05
dump it, you’re leaving, well, who and who are you
00:52:07
there, they give you a place in a hostel with
00:52:10
migrants, you get 500 euros and you’re
00:52:12
nobody, that is, well, you go to some kind of
00:52:14
pickets at the embassy and you, even though
00:52:18
all the difficulties there may not have disappointed you
00:52:21
listen shut up What did you influence you
00:52:23
were someone And who did you become as a result of
00:52:26
this you just committed an act of such
00:52:28
public political suicide That
00:52:30
is, just nobody You helped someone as a
00:52:34
result someone felt better in this
00:52:36
life after this well that’s why here I am when
00:52:41
I look at this,
00:52:43
we need to understand that if we want
00:52:46
something to change in Russia, we must
00:52:48
be in Russia. From outside influence is almost impossible,
00:52:53
some microscopically sleepy
00:52:55
little eyes that in reality, the further you go,
00:52:57
the less the situation inside is influenced by, here
00:53:00
we are, you know, walking every
00:53:02
week there is an embassy there But this in
00:53:04
Russia nothing will change
00:53:06
unfortunately Russia is changing time time
00:53:08
tells me the director is unfortunately
00:53:10
coming to an end Alexander Thank you very much the
00:53:13
main lesson that today is to do
00:53:15
what should and what will happen We
00:53:17
will still continue do something, at least
00:53:19
just on the broadcasts and talk about
00:53:21
what today
00:53:24
surrounds the varnish of this broadcast
00:53:26
Subscribe to our channel and
00:53:28
including the Telegram channel of Alexandra Niva
00:53:30
Until we meet again And most importantly, Take care of
00:53:32
yourself and your loved ones Take care of
00:53:36
yourself do not despair despair terrible
00:53:39
sin

Description:

Поддержать Живой гвоздь: с карт российских банков https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/7edd7c0e с карт иностранных банков https://www.donationalerts.com/r/zhivgvozd Boosty: https://boosty.to/zhivoygvozd Криптокошелёк: bc1qmdt96xvsun9a8qxvgakfx9gqy4x72penx5rm2p Trust Wallet: https://link.trustwallet.com/send?address=bc1qmdt96xvsun9a8qxvgakfx9gqy4x72penx5rm2p&asset=c0 Сегодня в прямом эфире своё Особое мнение представляет политолог Александр Кынев. Ведущий: Никита Василенко. 00:00 – Начало эфира 00:57 – Роль Навального* в российской политике 06:25 – Чем власти выгодна новость о гибели политика? 10:35 – Как изменится политический ландшафт России? 18:43 – О чем говорят попытки власти препятствовать акциям памяти? 20:40 – Покупайте книги на shop.diletant.media! 21:14 – Юлия Навальная призвала ЕС не признавать результаты российских выборов 23:20 – Предложение Михаила Ходорковского** вписать в бюллетень имя Навального* 30:57 – Что-то зависит от того, как избиратели проголосуют на выборах? 34:06 – Реально ли кандидату собрать подписи «по-тихому»? 42:00 – Пропаганда может саморазоблачаться 46:20 – Критика предвыборных роликов Слуцкого, Харитонова, Даванкова 51:24 – Эмиграция – акт политического самоубийства Телеграм-канал Александра Кынева: https://t.me/alexander_kynev Телеграм-канал Никиты Василенко: https://t.me/bookandroll Княжна Тараканова — героиня шестого тома комикса серии «Спасти». Княжна, чьё происхождение, да и имя, остаются тайной, выдавала себя за княгиню Елизавету Владимирскую — незаконнорождённую дочь императрицы Елизаветы Петровны. Оформляйте заказ на сайте diletant.shop! А ещё на сайте теперь можно оформить подписку на печатную версию журнала Дилетант! Попробуйте: https://diletant.shop/ 📌 Живой гвоздь в аудиоформате: https://podcast.ru/1616175210 🔔 Последние новости и анонсы программ с YouTube-канала «Живой гвоздь», а также контент от наших постоянных гостей и экспертов на официальном телеграм-канале: https://t.me/livegvozd Мобильное приложение "Эха": любимые программы в формате радиоприёмника. Простой интерфейс. Работа в фоновом режиме. Расписание эфиров. Скачать: в AppStore: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/%D1%8D%D1%85%D0%BE-online/id1639907671 в PlayMarket: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=online.echofm.app Сайт "Эха": https://echofm.online/ (если не открывается – ссылка на рабочую версию сайта всегда есть в тг-канале ЭХО FM https://telegram.org/ Подписаться на Youtube-канал Дилетант: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuIE7-5QzeAR6EdZXwDRwuQ?sub_confirmation=1 Магазин Дилетант: https://diletant.shop/ По вопросам взаимодействия: [email protected]

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Александр Кынев: Особое мнение / 20.02.24"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.