Download "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FApqg-FJLzN8%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Table of contents
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FATfBoP3LZ_s%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FDxIlwccIlUY%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FPYXdH5Mu4PA%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FS2GyT8SBrIY%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FULegRaLm47E%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FWpVQUETBvmQ%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FmBIeAy5uyNc%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FtKJ5rgt-F7Y%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FCQLsXK4uiHY%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
Russian
00:00:17
[music]00:00:24
[music]00:00:30
Hello everyone, Ilya Kusa is here with us. Hello00:00:33
Yes, today we will discuss the Golden00:00:36
Billion, what is it in general, what is it00:00:40
eaten with? I suggested Ilya to make this broadcast00:00:43
because Putin mentioned the Golden00:00:46
Billion more than once in his00:00:48
proclamations of all sorts of program interviews.00:00:52
Here it is This suggests00:00:54
that something, some term is used00:00:57
which seems to be on the surface it has00:00:59
always been somehow so, it seems to be00:01:01
understood and used, but for some reason00:01:03
right now it is also00:01:06
actively promoting global topics and00:01:09
on the one hand, someone there calls00:01:11
Putin and plus, as if with them,00:01:14
Iran PRC DPRK is an axis of evil and he in response00:01:18
means And you are the Golden Billion and it seems to be00:01:20
seen as you know The Fool The Fool himself, but00:01:23
I think that’s the Golden billion00:01:26
mobility is better than the people around the00:01:30
global West against the00:01:33
global West and everyone and with the00:01:35
global West against them, and the00:01:38
axis of evil turns out to be bad mobility, as it were, of00:01:41
people So purely with this kind of00:01:43
political technology Of course, first of00:01:47
history from the point of view I would like to analyze00:01:49
this question and secondly, well, it’s00:01:52
hopelessly outdated, this term is just what it00:01:55
could have been before.00:01:58
It would seem like there’s a golden billion there,00:02:00
such a well-fed00:02:01
Europe or something, the States and so on,00:02:04
this same way of life has long been00:02:06
inherent in many others countries that00:02:08
seem to be part of this Golden Billion have00:02:10
never been part of this global00:02:12
West, and so on, Singapore is immediately remembered00:02:14
And there are a lot of other00:02:16
countries, here’s what you think about00:02:19
this Well, you and I, we read about00:02:22
it00:02:31
Look uh come on right away Yes, we’ll00:02:35
just build a conversation00:02:37
So let’s talk about the history of00:02:42
the term in general, then we’ll move on to how it00:02:45
suddenly turned out to be part of the state00:02:47
ideology of Russia Well, even yes, in fact, I would00:02:50
say part of their ideology, part of their00:02:52
foreign policy communication and00:02:54
some kind of doctrine Yes, because00:02:55
really it was unexpected, well, I00:02:58
kind of understand because of my age,00:03:00
I don’t remember the times when this term00:03:02
was there, I don’t know. That is, I, I00:03:05
actually learned about it about the Golden Billion00:03:09
not so long ago before the war, but that’s how it00:03:12
was used in some Russian00:03:15
analysts, political scientists in their type of00:03:17
work, well, not in tea, how could I00:03:20
have looked at it like that, I think, okay, well, I could00:03:23
roughly imagine what they00:03:24
mean. There they described it, and then when00:03:27
the war began, they introduced this concept00:03:30
directly well, it seems to be established, that00:03:33
is, they have already begun to use it as if it were00:03:35
Well, this is a fact, but00:03:37
they of course introduced it in the context of the00:03:39
war in Ukraine in the context of their00:03:42
thesis about confrontation with the West, that00:03:45
is, by and large they used the00:03:48
golden theory golden billion00:03:50
as Well, it turns out Well, in a political and00:03:54
ideological vein, that is, in order to00:03:56
explain that essentially within the framework of00:03:58
the formation of the enemy, this is how I would00:04:01
explain it, what it really is, that is,00:04:04
in general, the Golden Billion, uh, the phrase is one00:04:07
of this is the main concept of essentially a00:04:09
conspiracy theory of the post-Soviet00:04:12
uh Yes, Soviet still turns out to be Soviet,00:04:14
but it turns out to be popularized in the00:04:16
post-Soviet era, that is, well, it all started in00:04:19
general, the whole conspiracy theory, it00:04:21
says that there is a certain group of00:04:25
global Elites Yeah,00:04:30
which are in collusion with each other00:04:32
Yes, for the purpose of00:04:35
redistributing goods of humanity in00:04:38
favor of the 10-2 richest countries there at the expense of00:04:41
all the rest, that’s basically all uh that is00:04:46
uh it’s like there’s a global Elite there I don’t00:04:49
know who like Who like whatever you want you00:04:52
call them there Illuminati fourth00:04:53
blood group Celts here you can already Well this00:04:55
you can do whatever you want, who have00:04:58
spent their whole lives00:05:00
doing everything so that rich countries00:05:03
rule over everyone else. And basically,00:05:05
well, mostly rich countries are the00:05:08
collective West. That is, Western00:05:11
Europe USA Canada Australia New00:05:12
Zealand plus sometimes Japan Well, poor00:05:16
Japan as if yes, the Japanese too, as if at00:05:18
least they are not Anglo-Saxons, of course, but nevertheless, these are00:05:20
their Puppets, that’s not the point,00:05:24
it’s like there,00:05:25
sometimes some conspiracy theorists are supporters of00:05:27
this theory, they still write the West plus00:05:28
Japan, but like this, well as if yes,00:05:31
I don’t know Well, these are those who especially Well, how do they00:05:33
explain those who explain by00:05:35
income level like rich, then Japan is also00:05:37
rich, but that means Japan South Korea for some00:05:40
reason does not appear there Yes,00:05:42
Singapore does not appear there as rich00:05:44
countries today, you can probably China00:05:46
there Well, it turns out to be brought in. I don’t know. Well, in00:05:49
general, that’s what this00:05:51
theory is, and this theory arose during the post-Soviet period. That00:05:54
is, in the English-speaking environment, you won’t00:05:56
find the phrase Golden00:05:59
doesn’t exist at all; it’s just that no one00:06:01
understands what it’s about. Therefore, when00:06:03
Putin or someone else or Lavrov, for example,00:06:07
they talk about this especially at the00:06:08
international level and they talk about00:06:10
it. I have a question about how00:06:13
advisable it is to do this00:06:16
because I am 99% sure that they are not understood.00:06:21
Well, no, there is no00:06:24
theory of the golden billion in everyday life in the Western00:06:26
environment, no scientific or pseudo-00:06:28
scientific in the English language, it just couldn’t00:06:30
resist, it’s clear that they will00:06:32
try to probably pull it on Well,00:06:34
impose what they are doing00:06:36
uh again as I said in the00:06:38
current context, that is, they stupidly pull it00:06:40
on the current context trying to00:06:43
form the image of his enemy somehow, well,00:06:45
because if you are engaged in00:06:47
propaganda, uh, it is very important that the enemy00:06:49
is one, yes, one, yes, that is, he must00:06:52
be. Somehow, somehow, it00:06:54
needs to be explained very simply; for those, the axis of evil arose;00:06:57
this is also what we dealt with you,00:06:59
too, was essentially a political history00:07:01
of polytechnological00:07:23
scientists there literally Well, several00:07:25
people who, well, for the first time said00:07:28
the term golden billion, and00:07:32
this was said within the framework of world discussions00:07:33
about the general problems of ecology of the00:07:35
overpopulation of the planet, yes, that is, it was00:07:37
not used at all in any what kind of00:07:40
conspiracy theory and no conspiracy theory was meant00:07:44
uh00:07:45
So you need to understand the context, that is,00:07:48
firstly, glasnost Perestroika especially00:07:50
seemed to help all of this,00:07:52
more open discussions began about00:07:54
what they write there in the West, what they write here00:07:56
uh an important milestone was the publication00:07:59
of this report of the Club of Rome, the limits of00:08:01
growth are this per year, which means the authors of the report00:08:05
they put forward a theory. Well, the assumption is00:08:08
that the population of the Earth is supposedly00:08:10
close to the fact that the resources of the planet are00:08:13
exhausted; catastrophes must reduce00:08:16
consumption; first and second, it is necessary to00:08:18
limit further00:08:20
population growth; then in the seventies, the population of the00:08:23
planet was almost 4 billion is now almost00:08:26
there, and they thought that there weren’t00:08:30
enough resources and something had to be done.00:08:33
Well, nothing so00:08:34
terrible was proposed there; in fact, there was no00:08:36
enslavement there or anything, that is, they00:08:38
proposed birth control00:08:40
through incentives. Well, through some00:08:42
things like taxes on children there00:08:44
or Propaganda of contraception or00:08:47
liberalization of abortions Well, these are00:08:49
the things To avoid, firstly, to avoid a00:08:54
sharp increase in the birth rate, plus there, for00:08:57
example, they suggested that the National00:08:59
government should strictly regulate the00:09:01
expansion of production volumes there00:09:02
in order to again reduce consumption, but00:09:04
they this was offered for their countries, that00:09:06
is, those very same golden00:09:08
billion of advanced enlightened people, yes,00:09:11
because these countries consume the00:09:12
most, which is true, that is, it was00:09:15
essentially a call for self-restraint against the backdrop of the00:09:17
birth of then00:09:20
the popularization of this wave of00:09:22
these began here is00:09:26
the eco-dictation History is there in recent00:09:28
years Greta Thunberg no yes, that is, this is in the00:09:30
seventies Even back in the00:09:31
Eighties it was very much in its00:09:33
infancy uh00:09:34
just when m just when00:09:37
the philosophy of this rethinking of00:09:40
our attitude to the environment began, that00:09:43
like nature is not just there is a source of00:09:46
resources for us, raw materials Yeah, what? Well, we00:09:49
live, as it were, in some kind of Union with00:09:52
it, that is, we are integrated into it as00:09:53
one of the elements and that’s it, and it’s fragile, that00:09:56
is, we also kind of depend on the environment00:09:58
and with us must take this into account and00:10:01
from here all these00:10:02
stories about the threat of overpopulation of the planet were born00:10:05
about the threat that means00:10:08
limited00:10:09
natural resources and about Global00:10:12
warming about the rise in water levels there about the00:10:15
garbage there that threatens Well and so00:10:17
on And so, within the framework of those00:10:19
discussions, Soviet specialists There they00:10:22
said, Well, they interpreted the report of the00:10:25
Club of Rome. So, well, it’s like they00:10:27
said that there’s an ideal00:10:30
picture, ideally, uh, on earth. Well,00:10:33
no more than 1 billion people should live there, so00:10:36
that the ecology there would be in the00:10:39
best possible condition there, well, they they didn’t00:10:40
propose to reduce the population to 100:10:42
billion, that is, it’s clear. They’re just like that,00:10:44
well, how would such assumptions have anything to do00:10:46
with it? Well, Soviet scientists, as part of00:10:49
their discussions, they used there, one00:10:51
of them used a term like, here a00:10:53
billion should be the most worthy00:10:54
people, that is, from here then it went00:10:56
gold a little later then there was no00:10:58
gold yet, just a billion billion00:11:01
worthy So this is the first stage of00:11:03
the evolution of this term, as it were. Moreover,00:11:06
I will immediately say that the report of the Club of Rome was00:11:08
it. It was sensational then, of course it is00:11:11
One of the first of its kind, plus00:11:12
this an influential00:11:14
institution, well, he was criticized a lot, he00:11:17
launched a discussion there in the West and within the00:11:19
framework of this discussion, he was criticized a lot there,00:11:21
they said that it doesn’t00:11:23
take into account technological growth, it doesn’t00:11:24
take into account, and so on, plus Well,00:11:26
time has passed since then, we see that some of the00:11:28
theses there have been confirmed by the authors in general,00:11:32
if we go even further into00:11:34
history, well, in general, the idea of this00:11:38
problem is like there are a lot of us and we will gobble up00:11:40
all the resources there and die, uh, it goes back to the00:11:43
15th century, uh, Malthusian, I don’t know if00:11:48
you’ve ever heard of the00:11:50
British economist Thomas Malthus,00:11:53
which is essentially Well, uh, he believed that00:11:59
economic growth, well, at one time,00:12:02
economic growth does not keep pace with00:12:05
population growth Uh-huh and that00:12:08
food shortages will be inevitable Well, food resources00:12:11
poverty hunger wars and therefore something needs to be00:12:15
done he, in particular, he researched00:12:19
exactly the impact of this population growth00:12:22
on the economy in terms of the agricultural00:12:24
economy, especially the agrarian economy, that is, he00:12:27
looked at it very narrowly. Well, from00:12:28
his point of view, what he was doing, but00:12:31
then, based on his theories, a bunch of all sorts of00:12:33
interpretations of movements and00:12:36
conspiracy theories and movements, for example, were born00:12:38
they advocated a00:12:40
forced reduction of the population there.00:12:41
Yes, it’s like Malthus says that there00:12:44
will be a lot of us, it’s necessary to urgently00:12:46
almost exterminate people there so that there00:12:48
are no more of them, well, in short, then in the00:12:50
end because of this, around and00:12:59
then in contrast to his theories,00:13:02
especially after the Industrial The revolutions of the 10th00:13:04
century in Britain, especially00:13:06
others, appeared. That is, critics appeared00:13:08
who said yes. Well, he’s wrong,00:13:10
look, a revolution has passed, that is,00:13:12
humanity is so inventive00:13:15
that we will always grow, but at the same time we will00:13:18
come up with a technology thanks to which00:13:20
we have leveled this balance of resources and00:13:22
population growth then there is, in fact, they00:13:24
put forward such a countertenor00:13:29
and thanks to this, technological00:13:32
progress will always equalize this00:13:33
balance and accordingly there will be00:13:35
more of us, but we00:13:37
will still be able to live in relative00:13:40
prosperity, yeah, well, that’s what happened, by and00:13:44
large, after the Industrial Revolution,00:13:47
the century he showed it then we are already00:13:50
approaching the seventies and00:13:51
the eighties again, everything swung in the other00:13:53
direction again When this00:13:54
philosophy of the green transition appeared,00:13:56
habitat nature and activists of the00:13:59
Baby Boomer generation, especially when again We00:14:01
returned to these discussions, what, after00:14:03
all, and when did the00:14:06
first ones appear there? scientists began there to00:14:09
study the influence of man on00:14:11
nature on the climate on that, well, on everything and00:14:14
they are like No, well, after all, we are some kind of00:14:17
Well, there is some kind of human influence on the00:14:19
climate on the global something is00:14:21
happening to the global ecosystem Well and00:14:23
today Moreover, this is like a00:14:25
trend, that is, but this is an eternal00:14:27
discussion like this between those00:14:29
who believe that, well, in fact, between00:14:31
those who believe more in00:14:33
technological progress in science like00:14:35
you Oleg Khomyak said yes there somehow00:14:37
he called it scientific thinking and00:14:39
those who believe that there is still00:14:42
some kind of some kind of limits00:14:45
Yes Well, it turns out, look today at00:14:48
the use of this Term in Russian00:14:51
Kremlin propaganda Yes, it00:14:53
has connected, which00:14:59
means the following: like there is somewhere00:15:01
supposedly this golden billion, it’s all00:15:03
essentially in the global West and it says00:15:06
that the West has almost conspired among themselves00:15:09
against other countries in order to00:15:11
destroy them because there is not enough space00:15:15
for everyone and therefore everything is00:15:16
sacrificed and terrible The West means that everyone, in00:15:18
this way, is destroyed, plunged00:15:22
into such a story in order to00:15:23
destroy this Golden00:15:25
Billion itself, it is in this context that they00:15:27
continue to call it the Golden Billion00:15:29
there, again exacerbating00:15:31
conspiracy theories. Putin in the same00:15:33
interview, I noticed he said00:15:35
something it’s like that’s where your vampire point ends00:15:39
and that means you won’t00:15:41
be stuffing your belly with human flesh anymore. Well,00:15:45
look, this is just, like, unthinkable00:15:47
categories for the leader of a state, like00:15:50
I don’t even know anyone in the history of00:15:53
mankind said such nonsense00:15:55
at all at the state level Well,00:15:57
there is game who is not Well, how is it game like a ball of00:15:59
vampires No, well, they said all sorts of game00:16:02
there that once upon a time, the president of the Gambia00:16:04
who was there considered himself this wizard there,00:16:07
he said that he invented a cure for00:16:08
AIDS there, well, in short, that is, there was00:16:10
a lot of stuff there, uh Well It’s00:16:15
just that the idea of the golden00:16:19
billion is based on, as we have already found out, yes00:16:21
discussions, scientific discussions Well, about00:16:25
ecology and about and then they migrated00:16:27
into discussions of a00:16:30
socio-economic nature about00:16:32
inequality because, in principle, the issue of00:16:35
resource distribution is directly00:16:37
related to inequality and global00:16:40
inequality exists that is, it is00:16:41
clear that this is not Fake, there are countries that are00:16:43
richer and poorer. Well, it is clear that in every00:16:46
country there are rich and poor, and the gap00:16:48
can be different, somewhere smaller, somewhere00:16:50
larger, and eternal debates about how to overcome00:16:53
inequality and whether it is worth defeating it at all00:16:55
and in In principle, it seems to me00:16:58
that what they did in Russia was they pulled this one,00:17:01
that is, firstly, yes, they00:17:05
essentially took a concept that was born in science,00:17:09
more precisely. In scientific discussions in general, it00:17:11
was not there in any way theoretically. It’s just that in00:17:14
scientific discussions they pulled it and00:17:29
used it. as an argument Why the00:17:31
current world order, which they00:17:33
call American, is not00:17:34
unjust Uh-huh That is, this is how00:17:37
the evolution happened in this whole00:17:40
history, and what about inequality there,00:17:43
when you talk about inequality here it’s00:17:44
already possible in general here you can00:17:47
touch on colonialism there and there and relations00:17:51
empires of colonies and the poor Rich and that00:17:54
is, here you can actually00:17:57
connect emotionally and ideologically with00:17:59
different countries depending on their00:18:01
history, that is, they are like this is absurd,00:18:04
but they use this absurdity in order to00:18:06
then form these00:18:08
communication bridges ideological with00:18:11
other countries, mostly non-Western,00:18:12
of course, because by and large00:18:16
this argument is resentment. Uh-huh. Well,00:18:19
you seem to be playing on the fact that00:18:21
injustice, we are poor. They are00:18:24
bad, which means they have been drinking our blood from us,00:18:26
so to speak, for many centuries,00:18:28
now we are as if we’ll hit it all together, we00:18:30
must rise up against this like this yes00:18:33
against such00:18:34
rottenness by the00:18:58
richest man in the world Yes there is a00:19:00
high level of stratification it’s true yes00:19:02
in general it’s like this well no one00:19:04
cares it’s like you know uh Well00:19:08
this is how you know it It’s like, Well, I’m00:19:09
saying it returns it’s very convenient00:19:12
because you’re00:19:14
not at all very difficult if you start scientifically00:19:18
arguing with it, it’s difficult because you00:19:20
start slipping into a00:19:21
discussion You know, there And where there’s no00:19:24
stratification, well, it’s like Everywhere there is yes, and you00:19:26
’re starting to slide into the discussion, but00:19:29
which stratification is better, such as in00:19:31
Russia or in the States, or And here it is like this and00:19:34
here it is like this Well, that is, it begins Well, a00:19:37
meaningless discussion that will00:19:39
probably never end because well, it’s00:19:40
forever, that is, For example, something or something00:19:43
was the basis of the controversy surrounding the00:19:45
teachings of Malthus, that is, in00:19:49
fact, there are still no answers to these00:19:50
questions. That is, no one knows. For example,00:19:52
will there be enough resources on the earth? Well, we don’t know00:19:54
that, well, will there be enough or not? I don’t. Well, I don’t know.00:19:57
Maybe it’s enough for 10 million, maybe it’s enough for 15,00:20:00
maybe it’s not enough for de, or maybe it’s00:20:01
enough for a trillion. Maybe I don’t know, yes, that00:20:03
is, no one knows, it’s possible.00:20:05
Is unlimited00:20:07
unlimited economic growth possible? I don’t00:20:09
know. Well, that is, that’s also a question. you00:20:11
can eat Well, look, taking into account00:20:13
everything that is happening, we already know there are00:20:15
startups that grow meat since they00:20:18
have acquired enormous penetration into the00:20:22
world, vertical so-called irrigation farms00:20:25
there are Mars conv Well, Mars is00:20:29
at the extreme, I’m not talking about the reality00:20:32
that exists now, that is00:20:34
Now they already exist and they are present in the00:20:37
economy. Vertical farms have00:20:38
changed agriculture. They no longer00:20:40
require any black soil at all. The00:20:42
sooner we allow it in Ukraine, it would00:20:45
seem that we should be proud of00:20:46
our black soil there. The further it goes, the00:20:48
more it makes no sense. Yes Here00:20:51
are there any limits to00:20:53
human ingenuity? Well, that’s the question. Well, maybe it’s00:20:56
obvious that no. Well, most likely no, I don’t know.00:20:59
Well, maybe you know, it’s not possible, maybe00:21:00
not, but maybe, again, how00:21:04
can there be no limits, but in the end we00:21:06
will become such inventors that we have00:21:07
something00:21:09
invented crippled you know how often00:21:11
these films are there or vice versa there is and00:21:14
will be like in the film you watched in the film00:21:16
Idiocracy No damn it all for some reason he00:21:19
somehow passed by everyone despite the fact that I00:21:20
think it’s the nineties there Well, it’s like the00:21:22
essence of the film is idiocracy, which, uh, like, the00:21:25
population of the Earth has grown sharply and the average00:21:29
IQ has fallen and everyone has become stupid here and there,00:21:33
dude, he ends up in the Future where everyone is00:21:34
dumber than him, that is, it’s very00:21:37
straight there, well, the film laughs at this00:21:39
idea that, as it were, Imagine that we’ve all00:21:41
really just become stupid, uh, and Well,00:21:44
how to live in such a story, in00:21:47
short, that is, and here it turns out and Well,00:21:49
you won’t, Well, you won’t fit into all this,00:21:52
well, fit into such discussions00:21:54
because, well, this firstly, no one00:21:55
will understand you, secondly, this is not Well, this is not on a00:21:57
scientific level, that is, Putin00:21:59
Putin and Patrushev are two people who00:22:01
mostly often talk about this. Well,00:22:04
they started talking a long time ago. Well, they just made a00:22:07
stupid instrumental out of it.00:22:11
here is the part that00:22:14
uh spread in the nineties to the00:22:18
current situation, again to00:22:20
create the image of the enemy And the plant Where did the00:22:23
conspiracy theory come from00:22:25
means this is essentially a product of the00:22:28
Sovka post by and large uh means uh The00:22:32
start of the conspiracy theory based on the00:22:34
golden billion was given by the Russian00:22:36
publicist Anatoly Tsykunov He promoted,00:22:38
he had a theory in the nineties of00:22:41
international control over00:22:42
Russia's resources, that's what he called it, and he sort of said it, well, the00:22:46
essence of it boiled down to the fact that00:22:48
Russia has a lot of natural resources and the00:22:50
West wants to control them Yeah, and00:22:53
that's all that's kind of all the essence and he00:22:55
referred to a bunch of documents there, you know, there are some00:22:58
UN documents there, and there are00:23:00
really existing and non-existent00:23:03
documents that really exist there, he00:23:05
freely quoted them there. Well, how is it, how do00:23:08
you know something there? Do you think what was00:23:10
meant here? So, in short, of00:23:12
course, no one will check, so00:23:14
everything sounded very convincing But it was really00:23:17
popularized by00:23:29
Vladimir Kara Murza’s uncle, the00:23:32
current oppositionist who is in00:23:35
prison. So Sergei00:23:39
wrote a lot about this group of00:23:40
international Elites who want to00:23:42
redistribute the resources of the entire planet into their00:23:44
own benefit there about everyone else there,00:23:46
and he wrote there that how they00:23:47
do it, they do it with the help of00:23:49
global manipulation of public00:23:50
consciousness so that this does not mean, well,00:23:53
in short, that is, this is00:23:55
how it is now, that’s what they mean for00:23:59
purposes, they do it all for purposes00:24:00
maintaining sustainable growth in the countries of the00:24:03
golden billion while simultaneously denying the00:24:05
possibility of the same development for the countries of00:24:07
which he called raw material appendages,00:24:09
another interesting expression that is also00:24:11
used raw materials appendages Ms. them00:24:14
ways to penetrate the markets of the00:24:15
civilized world in quotes of00:24:18
course the civilized world That is,00:24:20
thanks to Sergei Karamurt appeared in the00:24:23
vast expanses of the CIS, it manifested itself as if, uh, this00:24:28
means all our charm that00:24:32
Putin is now using and I must say00:24:35
that I was also a little surprised. I thought00:24:38
I knew that the Russian elites under Putin00:24:41
used this, well, in official00:24:43
rhetoric, but I found the earliest00:24:46
use in 2000 That is, when00:24:49
Putin became president, he was already at the00:24:51
Asia-Pacific Economic00:24:53
Cooperation summit, that is, at an international00:24:55
conference, normally. Here is a phrase on the00:24:58
development of the world, as you know, conditionally00:25:00
divided into North and South into the so-called00:25:02
Golden Billion and the rest of00:25:04
humanity Yeah, for this year, that is, they00:25:08
they didn’t use it often, but this is 2000, and00:25:11
then there’s it from time to time. Well, it’s not00:25:13
often that00:25:16
Patrushev pops in there too. Uh-huh. Well, that is, the00:25:19
FSB is conditional Yes, like Nikola Yes, but I think00:25:21
you know, you know, I think that this is due to the fact00:25:23
that they are both just they were imbued with00:25:26
these ideas, plus look, they were00:25:28
born in the tenth year, these are by the seventies,00:25:31
they are just 20 plus years old.00:25:34
Consider that Well, they entered00:25:36
adulthood and began to make a career and00:25:38
just then this is all a bummer, these00:25:40
theories all appeared, plus uh at the same time,00:25:45
if we take the Soviet Union, then at the same time there00:25:47
was just an explosion of all this stuff. Well,00:25:49
popularity both in the West and in the Soviet00:25:51
Union, there were all sorts of ufologies,00:25:54
parapsychologies, right in the sixties. Before00:25:56
that, several years before that,00:25:59
in the Soviet Union there were persecutions of00:26:00
these on cybernetics and geneticists because it was00:26:03
believed that this was what. That’s exactly what they were doing00:26:05
to rehabilitate science and there were a lot of00:26:07
publications in this regard that it was00:26:09
like, well, when Khrushchev was removed,00:26:10
it all started more or less after the00:26:12
year sixty-four, they began to00:26:14
rehabilitate it all, plus at the same time,00:26:16
all sorts of these pseudo00:26:18
scientific00:26:20
stories of Gumilyov with his00:26:24
Ethnogenesis were popular, then this Anatoly fmn his00:26:28
new chronology of world history where he is00:26:30
there something, this is all just in the00:26:32
seventies,00:26:33
then there was this same novel, I00:26:37
even found it, really Anatoly Ivanova Eternal00:26:40
Call then there was a film Eternal Call I don’t know00:26:43
if it’s a00:26:44
good Soviet film, it’s like they made it. It00:26:46
was just filmed on the basis of this novel and00:26:48
so there’s just a short piece of00:26:51
this novel where the words of one character00:26:53
in the nineties were taken from a00:26:55
rewritten novel uh, rewritten like this, they were00:27:01
inserted there as part of some00:27:04
American doctrine for the destruction of the00:27:06
Soviet Union, then it was called the00:27:09
Dalys plan, and that is, it all seemed to become a kind of00:27:12
personification of such a you know00:27:14
uber US plan to destroy the USSR00:27:17
from the inside, and this is also a conspiracy00:27:19
theory that is essentially00:27:22
fueled they want to destroy and00:27:24
enslave Russia, that is, you00:27:25
can imagine what kind of00:27:28
line it goes, and00:27:31
plus the Strugatsky Brothers also00:27:33
had it in one of their novels. There is an00:27:35
alien race that00:27:37
secretly controlled everyone there. Well, that is, also00:27:39
a reference to you, I think that Patrushev and Putin they00:27:42
developed during this period and how they were00:27:44
imbued with these ideas then many00:27:46
lived by it and then I don’t know to what00:27:50
degree of sincerity They generally believe in it,00:27:51
I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s really real,00:27:53
they think that’s how it is,00:27:56
but that’s what I’m interested in there is00:27:58
I think it has something to do with this Why exactly00:28:01
they if Look for example well plus00:28:04
you know at what point the mentality of00:28:07
people When in this year the report came out the00:28:12
limits of growth of the00:28:13
Club of Rome Well you know it’s in our00:28:16
minds how well especially then00:28:19
the report comes out But he can’t just go out00:28:22
like that, someone needs it. Well, someone00:28:24
authorized him from above, see the context of00:28:28
Kenon’s telegram, when you read it,00:28:30
you understand how the00:28:33
intellectual elite and the West are understood, how they are00:28:35
treated in general in the00:28:37
Soviet Union, and there The00:28:40
central idea is that the leadership of00:28:44
Moscow and the Kremlin are mainly that00:28:47
is, their approach is paranoid00:28:50
neurasthenia. They00:28:53
will each, in general, interpret every phenomenon00:28:55
as a great00:28:57
threat to the Soviet Union for themselves00:28:59
personally, for Moscow for the Kremlin, and so on00:29:01
for the authorities. here and therefore they00:29:03
were treated accordingly for half a century,00:29:06
of course. These are the first and second people. Well, you00:29:09
understand, we00:29:12
still haven’t got used to this, open00:29:14
public discussion, yes, that is,00:29:16
published a report Well, just a report, yes,00:29:19
that is, the authors wanted something Well yes, an00:29:21
influential institution, but nevertheless,00:29:23
it’s like today, you know, a report. I00:29:25
still see this story when00:29:26
some article or report was published somewhere00:29:29
for or somewhere else, it00:29:31
definitely means someone00:29:34
paid for it, or someone there- then00:29:37
the Kremlin is behind this Moscow Washington Beijing00:29:39
then some people there, what did they want to00:29:41
say with this or are they taking the ideas of the report as00:29:43
ready-made decisions, that is,00:29:46
there is still this moment that Well, we can’t00:29:49
I’m not saying that this doesn’t happen But00:29:51
whatever agreed publication Well, there is00:29:53
such a moment, but you see, it’s not00:29:56
allowed here, it’s very rarely allowed00:29:59
when it’s like this Well, a person00:30:01
thinks so, he published it and a00:30:03
discussion begins, the same thing happened then and I00:30:06
think it’s also connected with this. Which, yeah,00:30:08
it’s clear That’s it a report came out,00:30:10
maybe it means something, probably00:30:12
it means that there is some kind of plan to00:30:14
enslave these non-00:30:16
Golden Billion and so on. What does it have to do with00:30:18
me and what does it have to do with it? Look how many people lived in00:30:20
this and with this I even found I I found an00:30:23
interview with Boris Nemtsov where he, well,00:30:27
literally like that, but he True, he spoke about00:30:30
it in such a positive way, you know.00:30:32
I’ll read it to you here,00:30:34
like a small one,00:30:37
now it’ll load. That is,00:30:40
he said they asked him there. Well,00:30:43
you know that too it is indicative that Well, there is00:30:47
such a Golden Billion, these are successful00:30:48
countries that live without violence and where00:30:50
there is a powerful middle class in the countries of the00:30:52
Golden Billion human rights00:30:54
Law and democracy are considered00:30:55
the main values If you want to join the00:30:57
Golden Billion in the club of the rich and00:30:59
prosperous, then please don’t00:31:01
talk about America and about universal human00:31:04
values, that is, look, it’s like he’s00:31:06
talking about good things, but this is just this,00:31:08
well, just operating with this term,00:31:10
which was like this Well, Well, he said That00:31:12
is, everyone understands What he’s talking about Yes, in the00:31:13
Russian-speaking environment That is, even Boris00:31:15
Nemtsov about this, that is, they00:31:17
lived with this, this is Mikhail Kovalchuk, a00:31:20
close ideological friend of Putin00:31:21
who is believed to have influenced00:31:23
Putin’s ideology very much,00:31:24
he also spoke in Valdai back in 201500:31:26
and told a prog about the Golden00:31:28
Billion in the West who wants to00:31:30
enslave humanity through00:31:31
genetic experiments to create00:31:33
some kind of stubborn person like00:31:36
this subordinate Well, in short, I, well, I00:31:38
won’t retell all this, the most00:31:41
interesting thing is that exactly in the twenty-second,00:31:43
starting from the twenty-second, this00:31:45
story went straight to the world00:31:47
level That is, I even found I I thought this is00:31:49
not the highest level I think I wanted to00:31:51
read Karaganov who was in his00:31:53
article but no, I found Sergei00:31:55
Lavrov’s speech at the UN at the UN That is, he is from the00:31:59
UN rostrum, that is, right now I’m just this I’m00:32:02
not I honestly missed this moment00:32:04
this was on September 24 th Yeah00:32:08
Russia firmly chose the WTO So00:32:11
now the unipolar00:32:13
model of world development is becoming a thing of the past, which00:32:15
served the interests of the West of the golden00:32:17
billion whose excess consumption of the Centuries00:32:20
was ensured at the expense of the resources of Asia,00:32:21
Africa and Latin America, today the00:32:24
formation of sovereign states00:32:26
ready to defend national interests00:32:28
leads to the formation of an equal,00:32:29
socially oriented and sustainable00:32:31
multipolarity uh I well00:32:35
uh Russia since 202200:32:40
has finally begun to use this specifically for a00:32:41
global00:32:43
audience And the most interesting beginning00:32:46
is conceptualism This is already to Karaganov00:32:48
where he said this in the article That is, he is00:32:50
already using it as uh well in fact,00:32:52
part of considering their worldview, that is,00:32:54
for him, this is what he wrote in the article,00:32:57
uh, uh, which was called the century00:33:00
of wars, yes, the century of wars, part00:33:05
two, I don’t know if00:33:09
I’ll find it. I think that I00:33:11
[music]00:33:13
will find it, well, he I probably won’t now00:33:17
I’ll find it right away quickly That is, he wrote about00:33:20
he also wrote about the fact that there is, well, the00:33:23
Golden Billion, as it were, yes, these are the00:33:25
rich countries of the West and he immediately has the concept of00:33:28
the global majority. That is, the00:33:30
global majority is everyone else. It’s00:33:32
clear00:33:35
and why the majority because well00:33:37
naturally, that is, to emphasize00:33:40
that you seem to understand us more. That’s why00:33:45
I, this is what’s new. That is,00:33:49
before, at this level, Russia did not00:33:52
use another Rhone, if in a year,00:33:55
how would it00:33:56
be used, how would it develop maturely00:33:58
In the depths of I do00:34:02
n’t even think that he believed there. To be honest, I00:34:03
wouldn’t like to understand what he00:34:05
believes, but instrumentally it’s like it’s00:34:08
instrumentally it’s definitely00:34:10
instrumental. That is, these are two words00:34:12
that help to separate all other people00:34:15
from the conditional global West.00:34:17
And in fact, socio-economically00:34:21
set up against Mr. Yes, socially,00:34:22
and look, it doesn’t even work out, they00:34:24
use a national characteristic00:34:26
because Well, in itself, the history of the gap00:34:30
between the north and south is economic.00:34:32
Well, initially in general In the eighties,00:34:34
when this theory appeared, North00:34:35
global North global south is00:34:37
economy That is, it was in terms of the level of00:34:38
income of such countries mainly Since00:34:41
then Much has changed Now we00:34:43
have non-Western countries that are also00:34:45
Rich and so on, but in Russia they00:34:48
use this on a national00:34:49
basis, that is, there are Anglo-Saxons West00:34:52
That is, this mostly white Europeans,00:34:55
Americans, Australians, New Zealanders and00:34:57
there Japan. In general, in short, plus there is00:35:01
everyone else. That is, it’s all not00:35:02
Western, but Africa Latin America, the00:35:04
Middle East, Asia. That is, this is the first00:35:07
they use it only in this way,00:35:09
sometimes they use it in00:35:12
socio-economic key, but in the00:35:14
anti-colonial agenda That is, when00:35:15
you say that these are former empires, but00:35:19
former colonies, and so it turns out that the empires00:35:21
sucked resources from the colonies and now the00:35:23
colonies are poor, that’s how it all is00:35:26
explained Why a billion Listen Nuno00:35:29
actually sounds very Just as00:35:31
instrumental as taking away and it’s impossible00:35:33
to divide the land like the peasants there and it00:35:35
should be like that in propaganda,00:35:36
well, you can’t. That’s why I00:35:38
say that it’s essentially00:35:41
instrumentalism for creating the image of the00:35:44
enemy, that is, they formed it in00:35:46
Russia, but in Russia it was easy00:35:48
because all this is developing in Russia in the Russian-speaking00:35:50
environment now. The main task of the00:35:52
Russian00:35:53
leadership is essentially to impose this on the00:35:56
world level. Yes, that is, they00:35:58
haven’t done it yet because let’s00:36:00
touch on this, let’s reveal this story, how00:36:02
this whole story goes to in the global00:36:05
South in the non-Western World, it can00:36:07
come because look at the story about the00:36:10
Golden Billion, it fits well, as00:36:12
we already understood, into the anti-colonial00:36:13
agenda. And this applies to many00:36:16
states, especially in Africa and the00:36:17
Middle East, where things are still very acute.00:36:21
These are the feelings, uh, well, very he is keenly00:36:25
and sensitive to his own,00:36:27
this is about history, that is, there is a00:36:30
lot in the national memory; it is connected00:36:32
with relations with their former00:36:34
metropolises, which were often00:36:37
painful, especially in Africa,00:36:40
because well, there you have to look, well,00:36:42
this goes especially well in the00:36:44
French-speaking zone00:36:49
from Britain it was always difficult for them to divorce00:36:53
with the colonies and this seems to00:36:56
fit well with Britain, it’s more difficult but00:36:58
then there This story of the golden billion00:37:01
fits well on the agenda of the left uh in00:37:05
Western communities Uh-huh That is, this is not00:37:07
only for the non-West Why Because well00:37:10
uh very well, some radical left00:37:13
left liberal uh movement organizations00:37:16
Well, not all but some Yes, I would say the00:37:18
majority They are uh one of their main00:37:21
postulates Why do they criticize there,00:37:23
for example, right-wing governments in general,00:37:25
traditional governments are for the gap, that is, they are00:37:28
because of That is, their themes are the fight against00:37:29
poverty, the gap between the rich and the00:37:31
poor, they always try to00:37:33
play at the level of the shop. Uh-huh And that’s00:37:36
exactly the radical left. This00:37:37
fits well with the Golden billion that00:37:40
leads the poor. Well, yes, well, neo-Marxism00:37:43
will not like it for everyone, again, those00:37:45
who are smart Well, they’re able to think a little bit.00:37:47
It’s clear they’ll kind of laugh at00:37:50
this. That’s because even they do00:37:52
n’t seem to promote such nonsense, such nonsense,00:37:54
but in some, but not in the leftist00:37:58
agenda as a whole, this may fit in, but00:38:01
this fits in Well, also in the religious00:38:05
agenda I think, well, because in general00:38:08
Well, look, this leads you to the idea of an00:38:10
existential war, that is, that well,00:38:13
there is E well, it’s just Well, it’s like there’s00:38:18
a minority sitting there uh and Well, they just want to00:38:21
kill you, they want to destroy you,00:38:23
Satanists, vampires And even Satanists and00:38:26
vampires are00:38:32
lack of spirituality and without God. And all the more00:38:35
naturally, you understand, and from here it’s00:38:38
like, why is Russia, coupled with this,00:38:40
right away they have a little train going on?00:38:42
This is Anti LGBT Yes, that is, you see, I mean, there are00:38:46
already three of them like Three groups00:38:48
that include Where can a golden00:38:51
story with a golden billion lie, that is, it is00:38:52
necessary to correct this story, it’s clear00:38:54
there, but that is, you can’t tell it00:38:56
like a story like that, just like that, you know, it00:38:59
throws it at Tucker Carlson, well,00:39:01
it needs to be somehow smarter, of course Lavrov00:39:03
is doing it smarter. I don’t think00:39:06
he didn’t do it. It’s just, in00:39:07
my opinion, it was with Kiselyov, it was a00:39:10
program interview. Yes, before00:39:12
exactly the election, before the re-00:39:14
election, like, before the confirmation of00:39:16
his term in the type elections. That is, he it’s00:39:19
like he said it and gave it all away, that’s why00:39:22
it seems like it’s00:39:25
for internal consumption, for sure. Well, it00:39:28
also turns out to influence someone, that00:39:31
is, definitely for it to be00:39:32
used somewhere else. Yes, that’s how it00:39:36
falls like this that is, and in principle,00:39:38
now the task of Russia is to somehow00:39:43
popularize this, well, I think they will start from00:39:45
Africa, it flies best there, why00:39:48
Well, I think so, why because there Well,00:39:50
firstly, there are a lot of illiterate people,00:39:52
little literate, plus they are now at such a00:39:56
very level of00:40:01
anti-French ressentiment Russia now has00:40:03
all sorts of entry points, they are opening00:40:05
cultural centers Media and so on, the00:40:07
Middle East is also still possible on an00:40:10
Arab street It’s more difficult, but it’s possible, but00:40:14
that’s what I’m saying, it needs to be00:40:15
wrapped up in a religious agenda with00:40:17
this sauce, it’s like a [ __ ] without00:40:19
spirituality and morality and Western00:40:22
communities, well, in Asia it’s more difficult00:40:25
because in Asia there are a lot of rich countries Yeah,00:40:27
which in general, the Golden Billion00:40:30
turns out to be the second Golden Billion,00:40:33
it turns out, but no Well, yes, it is Actually00:40:36
interesting because by and large00:40:38
Yes, and in Russia there is a Golden Billion Well, if00:40:41
so, that is, if you look at them, if you00:40:43
use their own logic against them, then it00:40:44
turns out that all these years, starting from00:40:47
all 20 years of Putin’s rule, it turns out that the00:40:51
Russians00:40:52
were robbed by these totalitarian world00:40:55
elites and here one of the two, either Putin00:40:58
did nothing Well, he couldn’t do anything, he couldn’t00:41:01
defeat them in any way Well, the question is where did00:41:03
he get the money then, this is the second, this00:41:05
begs the question of the second or he was in cahoots with them00:41:08
and then he decided to cheat them And00:41:12
the war began Well, that’s it Well, that00:41:14
is, in short, this raises the question then00:41:16
Well, actually, why in Russia are there a lot of00:41:19
poor people and the entire Elite is rich? They themselves00:41:21
know it and they laugh at it, it’s everywhere,00:41:23
it’s in any of the People’s discourse, it’s just00:41:25
like ours, that is, it00:41:28
raises questions Isn’t Putin and00:41:31
his entourage part of the golden billion00:41:33
who are simply schismatics and seem to be00:41:36
solving their own problems? They didn’t come to an agreement with00:41:39
the Anglo-Saxons. Well, as of right now, yes, for sure. Well,00:41:41
the question here is that in any00:41:44
case, they are like a tool maker, yes, that00:41:47
is, they this has already achieved00:41:50
some kind of penetration, it’s already all started,00:41:53
it’s already like a national, it’s not even a00:41:54
national, a global doctrine like that, from a00:41:58
marginal theory in Soviet times,00:42:01
it grew straight into a whole mainstream00:42:04
discourse like that, you know, with the goal of a world00:42:07
Revolution, practically what, well, what do they00:42:10
think? yes, they think that it’s00:42:11
straight in general, that’s straight, I don’t think that it00:42:14
will fly into the world revolution, but yes, that00:42:17
is, it turns out that the most vulnerable are00:42:20
peoples where there is a low level of literacy,00:42:23
where there is a very serious00:42:32
anti-parasite now, France is hated by everything there,00:42:34
just like that, where there are wars this is00:42:37
good because it explains a lot of00:42:39
problems Why are you so poor Golden00:42:41
billion zhezh Well, you have to go to war with00:42:44
him, that is, usually in a country00:42:47
in a crisis they are the most vulnerable, that00:42:50
is, well, and where the educational00:42:51
system does not seem to work very well00:42:54
that is, with one hand you can create a crisis for them,00:42:55
as if to push the crisis, and with00:42:57
the other, as if to show that there is a way out,00:42:59
so look, it’s absolutely the same. This is exactly the00:43:01
same as the Islamic state in the Middle00:43:03
East, why did it rise? Where did00:43:04
the terrorists of the Islamic00:43:06
state come from, who captured half of Syria and00:43:08
almost half of Iraq there uh they, too, they also00:43:11
appeared in conditions of an acute crisis in00:43:13
Iraq when everyone, well, poverty, poverty,00:43:16
wars, the war there, well, the consequences of the00:43:17
American invasion and they are the same, they00:43:19
also sold a super simple00:43:21
model,00:43:22
uh Well, everything is bad with us because the00:43:25
Western crusaders Uh-huh they need to be kicked out00:43:27
Everything Let's live like00:43:31
the prophet lived in the Middle Ages everything Well that's Well at00:43:33
least they didn't actually00:43:35
build it there everything was very00:43:36
pragmatic They made00:43:38
millions there from their oil deals but00:43:40
nevertheless they also sold super a00:43:42
simple, most primitive story00:43:44
in which Well, in which they recruited00:43:48
illiterate people at the grassroots level So00:43:51
people from many from nothing Well, out of desperation from00:43:55
some of these, they went and thought00:43:57
that this was kind of a good good option00:43:59
Russia sells the same thing on the world market00:44:01
level Taking advantage of the problems that00:44:04
exist in different countries or creating00:44:06
these problems or Taking advantage of existing00:44:09
problems and creating this00:44:11
counterbalance And and of course, playing on the00:44:12
more global history of the split between the West00:44:14
and the non-West, which really exists00:44:16
for other reasons there,00:44:18
historical political ideological00:44:20
economic geopolitical and so on. there is00:44:22
already, but they are simply playing on this split,00:44:24
confirming it, further aggravating it and00:44:27
drawing on such00:44:29
conspiracy theories. Because it is beneficial for them,00:44:31
that is, because it is very important for them00:44:33
that the West and the West remain00:44:35
divided and that Russia is outside the West.00:44:38
Uh-huh and well, I’m like It would be a paradox00:44:44
Yes, that Russia is outside the West, considering that, well,00:44:46
Russia has always been part of the Western world00:44:48
and has strived to be of the Western world00:44:51
historically But now they are trying00:44:53
to speak on behalf of the non-Western world, well,00:44:57
the only thing they have so far is Well, they are simply00:45:00
successful in some things only due to the00:45:02
fact that, unfortunately, Western countries Well,00:45:04
they can’t somehow fight off this00:45:06
discourse yet, well, somehow they’re not00:45:08
doing very well, so now they’re fighting00:45:11
it off with the axis of evil again Uh-huh, but I don’t know, I00:45:15
always said that yes, the axis of evil Why I do00:45:17
n’t like this term because they00:45:18
return to what has already been00:45:20
discredited. Well, you all played this00:45:22
story already with Iraq and Afghanistan,00:45:24
well, yes, it can be sold there in the00:45:27
West. Maybe, but this is00:45:30
not perceived at all. That is, if you00:45:31
want to compete with Russia there in00:45:33
Africa, it won’t sell at all,00:45:35
so for now, well, well, I don’t know,00:45:38
they don’t work with the Russians,00:45:40
these are all sorts of discursive us00:45:43
Well, I hope that someday they will00:45:45
work, yes Well, look, let’s state00:45:47
that the moment is like this, you said at the beginning00:45:49
that00:45:57
population growth will00:45:59
outpace economic growth and will00:46:02
cause wars. So everything happens00:46:05
exactly the other way around. Well, yes, wars00:46:08
are caused more likely by an oversaturation of00:46:11
economic growth because, well, there is a war00:46:14
on the part of Russia on the territory of Ukraine.00:46:16
This is clearly a war caused by the wealth of00:46:19
Russia, that is, Russia became so00:46:22
overly rich, inflated with wealth, that it00:46:25
simply did not know what to do with the money and00:46:27
resources and therefore easily00:46:29
decided on such an adventure as an attempt00:46:31
to seize the entire territory of Ukraine or00:46:34
whatever, I don’t think that this is directly related to00:46:37
money00:46:38
I would, well, I don’t think so, our00:46:41
war is purely political and ideological,00:46:43
that is, Well, look, well, it is00:46:44
also caused by economic reasons, economic growth.00:46:46
That is, in Russia there now, let’s say,00:46:48
300 yards have been arrested only there00:46:50
somewhere in the west. And there is also a certain00:46:53
amount there is still a certain amount of gold there,00:46:56
which is simply00:46:58
based on the economic ones, that is, Russia00:47:00
felt confident; it was the oil00:47:02
boom that gave them a crapload of money,00:47:05
especially in the 2000s when we00:47:07
blew it. We seemed to live simply and00:47:09
everything was fine for everyone and We did00:47:11
n’t seem to pay much attention to the fact that the oil00:47:14
boom allowed Russia to recover after00:47:16
the nineties. And by the way, it’s interesting. I’m also in00:47:19
the context. What could it be possible00:47:22
to assume that this popularization of00:47:25
conspiracy theories in Russia by the Russian-speaking00:47:27
environment could arise, among other things, in00:47:29
contrast to the dashing Den? What are we they lived00:47:31
poorly, these were liberal reforms, and00:47:33
liberal reforms were supported by the West. Which00:47:35
means this was an attempt by the West to00:47:38
enslave us. And this is not the first time I00:47:42
’ve noticed how Putinists very often00:47:46
carry out. Well, very often they criticize the00:47:49
Yeltsin era, and this is precisely why they think that00:47:51
he is like this and Gorbachev in general,00:47:53
Gorbachev destroyed the Soviet Union, you know,00:47:55
this is the same thesis, Gorbachev was the00:47:57
last person who wanted to00:47:58
destroy the Soviet Union. You know, if00:48:00
you read about him at all, look at it, it’s00:48:02
just him. He didn’t want it at all, he00:48:04
directly did everything to prevent this from happening, but00:48:07
here They have these two theses:00:48:09
Gorbachev and his Perestroika destroyed the00:48:11
Soviet Union. And by the way, from the point of view of00:48:13
the theory of the golden billion, he00:48:15
did this on purpose because it was a conspiracy of00:48:17
those very Illuminati and00:48:20
Yeltsin seemed to be bad liberal reforms00:48:22
that were precisely aimed at00:48:25
enslavement Russia, but then, not later,00:48:27
that’s all. Then we start getting up from our knees, yes,00:48:29
that is, in this regard, yes, they00:48:30
earned a lot of money, they were able to00:48:32
recover, strengthen their economy,00:48:34
and since in Russia the sensitivity of00:48:37
inequality Uh-huh is low Well, as we see00:48:42
people Well, somehow it’s normal Well we live and00:48:44
live So we, too, by the way, have00:48:47
sensitivity and the same, that’s why they00:48:51
They, that is, they accumulated resources and could00:48:54
afford to think aggressively in geopolitics00:48:59
Here’s the game of the game, you know,00:49:01
we come here, these armies here you know how to00:49:04
strategy But the only problem is that00:49:06
this it’s not just there We’re there now, it’s00:49:07
twitching,00:49:27
yes, or for a resource. Well, for some00:49:28
real conflict, what is this con, you00:49:30
understand, yes, or for water, for example, for00:49:32
water resources there, well, that is, you00:49:34
understand there, at least the subject of the dispute is there, for00:49:36
example, here so and so,00:49:40
of course, not all wars for land are resolved either, but the00:49:41
Israeli-Palestinian one, as we see, is00:49:43
not resolved in any way. Although I say it00:49:45
all started with land, land disputes, but00:49:47
here there is a lot of abstract things,00:49:51
a lot of this, it00:49:53
comes in far-fetched. That is, like you with00:49:55
everyone the question arises of how to speak to these,00:49:57
that is, what do you offer Putin? Yes, this is00:50:00
how you00:50:01
will calm him down, that is, because00:50:03
obviously in such a framework there are00:50:05
rational arguments, but they may00:50:08
not always00:50:09
work, why For example, I say, I’m00:50:12
convinced why a supporter of the00:50:14
thesis that China will not influence00:50:16
Russia no matter how much he wants, but if00:50:18
tomorrow China says so, I’ll call Putin and00:50:22
say I’m there economically. Now I’ll00:50:24
say. So, let’s be sure00:50:27
that Well, maybe they won’t succeed00:50:30
because there’s something else there are also, that is, there are00:50:32
economic arguments, maybe00:50:34
some of the Elites will be heard, but I’m sure that some of00:50:37
them are Well, they’ll say something like this Well, we00:50:40
heard you, but we have a kind of Golden00:50:42
Billion here We are on fire Russia Under siege The enemy is at the00:50:45
gates NATO bases bio-laboratories And00:50:47
still, you are a00:50:54
traitor. Russia sees,00:50:57
regarding, for example, Trump, how00:51:00
clear it is already becoming, for example,00:51:02
instrumentally against China, that is,00:51:05
Russia sees that it is possible to jump out of this00:51:08
story if you wait for the results of00:51:09
the election in the United States; Trump will change the00:51:12
foreign policy doctrine; he will again move on to00:51:15
bilateral relations there, not as a bloc;00:51:18
will go to ram China00:51:20
IT can00:51:23
Rava and00:51:25
sza in Let there be a price for this issue and00:51:28
China understands this, that is, it is obvious that00:51:30
China understands this because Trump for00:51:32
China is an exact enemy, absolutely00:51:35
understandable. Well, the Destroyer is a ram that seems to have00:51:39
already caused a lot of trouble,00:51:40
hence there were a lot of reactions connected with00:51:42
Covid and so on, where00:51:44
China tried to win back this00:51:46
situation there, in general, for China, the arrival of Trump is00:51:49
worse than the presence of00:51:51
Biden. I would argue. Well, there are a lot of00:51:54
say such things Conte00:51:57
names, we perceive it, we perceive it because we00:52:01
perceive it. Well, there are simply no practical00:52:04
arguments that say about the fact that00:52:06
Trump will do something terrible with China.00:52:08
I mean calculate the risks. That00:52:10
is, if China looks at the00:52:12
situation yes. Here and now they already had a00:52:14
negative experience when there was a00:52:16
trade war against them that Trump started,00:52:18
then they were forced to interrupted by00:52:20
Covid, as it were, and the rest of the story00:52:23
that happened, but again with the trade00:52:25
war, that is, yes, they lost something. But00:52:27
it was, you know, I always did,00:52:30
from my point of view, the difference between Trump and00:52:31
Biden is00:52:33
in the strategic length of their visa00:52:37
relative to China, that is Trump, he00:52:40
focused on tactical steps here00:52:43
and now, like a trade war. They00:52:45
then agreed on a trade00:52:46
agreement and that’s it. That is, he brought it00:52:48
to the end, like they signed something, that’s00:52:50
all over. And then00:52:53
he blamed the coronavirus China is00:52:55
something complicated there, but in the end, well, really, well,00:52:57
nothing of any practical action, he did00:52:59
n’t take any serious actions against00:53:00
China, Biden had00:53:01
less of this tactical,00:53:04
some of these sharp body movements,00:53:06
but he works, his team there,00:53:09
maybe not personally, he’s there but he00:53:10
has smart people around him who understand00:53:13
this, as if in the institutionalization of00:53:16
the confrontation, that is, they build00:53:18
partnerships there, small alliances with some00:53:20
countries, they bring up new ones, which Trump did not00:53:22
do. That is, from the point00:53:25
of view of the confrontation, Biden is more dangerous00:53:28
for China Well, team Biden because00:53:31
Trump Well, it’s incomprehensible; Trump is00:53:34
more likely simply incomprehensible; he’s dangerous because00:53:36
he’s incomprehensible; that is, there may be something00:53:38
terrible. Or maybe in general there is something00:53:40
in this too. Yes, and in this regard, I00:53:42
agree. But with Putin, really00:53:44
if take internationally This is the00:53:45
international dimension that00:53:47
he has for him, his favorite topic for him.00:53:49
He, yes, he, he strives to play00:53:53
this card that I am the third pole between the00:53:55
USA and China. Yes, the Chinese know this and for00:53:58
this reason China is doing everything now00:54:00
to The Russian economy gradually grew to suit00:54:02
itself in order to create such00:54:05
conditions, as I see in the future,00:54:07
such conditions that under any president00:54:10
in Russia they would be dependent on China and00:54:12
they would not go anywhere. That is,00:54:15
this is what China is doing now, that00:54:16
is, they are creating such an economic00:54:19
situation in which Russia will be so00:54:21
dependent on the Chinese economy that not a00:54:23
single Leader in Russia, even about the West, will00:54:25
be able to go against China00:54:28
completely. That is, he will be forced to00:54:30
constantly look back at their interests. It is00:54:32
in this logic that they will not00:54:33
naturally ask Russia about nothing and00:54:35
why not, of course, let it continue there,00:54:38
that is, that is why they are this is the weakening of00:54:40
Russia Yes, that is, if For example,00:54:42
therefore, for example, for them, in principle, there00:54:45
will be another year of war Well, it will be good to00:54:47
freeze the war Okay Let there be00:54:49
a freeze, they will continue anyway00:54:50
because Russia will remain under00:54:51
sanctions in any case, they proceed from the fact00:54:53
that this will last for a long time, that is, in this regard, it is00:54:55
suitable for the Chinese and they will do it.00:54:57
Well, well, how to create exactly such a00:54:59
situation, including because they00:55:01
know what and because they not profitable00:55:03
too strong Russia at hand00:55:05
Especially with such00:55:07
strange ideological stories about the Golden Billion00:55:09
and the Return of Historical00:55:11
Lands, last week there was a publication of a00:55:14
post Desperate Alliance of Russia China00:55:17
Iran and North Korea I think you00:55:20
read it, I’m interested in this in the context of this00:55:23
publication only one the thesis, as it were, to00:55:25
ask a question in its development That00:55:29
is, here Here the Author says that This00:55:31
idea is becoming quite00:55:34
widely discussed within the States themselves,00:55:37
that in general it is impossible to look at the00:55:41
Union of the so-called Russia North00:55:45
Korea Iran China as just axis of evil00:55:48
And this is more of a Union of despair that it’s like they’re00:55:51
backed into a corner, they don’t seem to have00:55:54
any opportunities, but I agree with this, it’s00:55:57
interesting, let’s00:56:00
develop just that, that’s the thesis00:56:03
that I Well, I formulated it differently00:56:05
But this is it what I rather believe in00:56:08
because well, firstly, there is, yes, there I wo00:56:10
n’t talk about the historical00:56:17
background; different histories have00:56:20
such a complex history among00:56:23
themselves; well, my thesis has always been00:56:27
that it is the current context that it creates, that00:56:30
is, that This is a situational partnership00:56:32
that is determined by the current00:56:34
context. I am almost sure00:56:37
that if the West offers Iran or North Korea or00:56:40
China tomorrow some kind of00:56:43
deal that takes into account its00:56:45
interests, they will agree to it because it has been the00:56:49
basis of foreign policy for at least the00:56:52
last 10 years. Iran North00:56:55
Korea00:56:57
in China the situation there is more complicated given00:56:59
its global ambitions, but North Korea00:57:01
Iran and this was visible in practice was00:57:03
confirmed by the negotiations that they00:57:05
conducted with the West for a long time, their desire00:57:08
was to reach an agreement with the west, if Iran did00:57:10
not want to negotiate with the west, they would00:57:12
not have negotiated never, that is, they00:57:14
first conducted 10 years of00:57:16
joint venture negotiations on the fifteenth nuclear treaty, signed00:57:20
an agreement, then Trump00:57:23
abandoned them and legally00:57:28
then they fought there, but in the end they00:57:32
went back to negotiations with Biden in 100:57:34
year when he came to power, the negotiations00:57:36
did not end in anything, but even now I00:57:41
read about the fact that the states there, through Oman,00:57:44
Saudi Arabia, are sending them signals00:57:46
that let’s00:57:47
talk and so on. That is, by00:57:49
and large, Iran is interested in00:57:52
negotiating with the West and this is00:57:54
logical because Russia cannot00:57:57
give them what Western markets can Yeah00:57:59
Well, this is a fact. Well, Russia doesn’t have such00:58:02
resources. Well, China does, but China00:58:05
behaves like this incomprehensibly,00:58:08
plus it’s difficult with China because they are also00:58:12
afraid to do some things because of00:58:13
sanctions, that is, in North Korea it’s the00:58:16
same if look at their actions, what00:58:18
they are doing, especially lately,00:58:19
they are constantly talking there. Let's00:58:22
negotiate with us. Let's00:58:24
admit that this is all the desire to be00:58:26
recognized as a nuclear state, the lifting of00:58:28
sanctions, this is all the desire for negotiations00:58:30
not about war, otherwise they would have gone to war a00:58:32
long time ago. therefore, this is all a00:58:35
situational partnership, that is, they are00:58:37
partners with each other for the reason that00:58:39
they have a narrow corridor of opportunities, they need to00:58:42
somehow resist the collective00:58:43
West. The so-called and how to do this, we00:58:45
must do it together. It’s easier than00:58:47
one at a time. So they are trying where they can00:58:50
find some kind of history, the00:58:53
Russians know all these vulnerabilities, knowing00:58:56
that Iran now has a very narrow00:58:58
corridor of opportunities; North Korea00:59:00
also has no alternatives. No, well, they seem to be00:59:02
taking advantage of it in this regard.00:59:04
Russian diplomacy plus is also00:59:06
working well, really working well for00:59:08
they are strong, there are people who know how to00:59:11
sell there, and that’s how it all00:59:15
works, but I’m almost sure that this00:59:17
can be broken if the West is00:59:19
pragmatic and more flexible. You need to00:59:22
step over many things, for example,00:59:24
which ones. Well, look at00:59:26
what the problem is with Iran uh, Americans don’t00:59:29
trust them, Iranians don’t trust them. Well,00:59:31
it’s clear, uh, the states are not00:59:42
a company00:59:50
that they won’t come out again Well, that’s00:59:53
logical. You, well, you negotiate with a00:59:55
person, he’s cheating on you, how00:59:57
will you negotiate with him for the second time,00:59:58
you’ll probably be on watch for the second01:00:00
time you will already be thinking, give me01:00:02
additional guarantees. Let’s01:00:04
go there, maybe another01:00:06
notary there has certified something. Well, that is, you01:00:08
will already begin to01:00:11
put forward some additional demands, and that is, the states, not01:00:14
the company,01:00:26
will offer Iran a compromise Yes, it will be01:00:28
toxic, unpopular the idea, uh, that is,01:00:30
it will have to be promoted in spite of that. That is,01:00:33
it directly requires a person who simply made a01:00:35
strong-willed decision. Well, like Obama01:00:38
did it in the fifteenth year, he was very01:00:40
criticized, but there was no01:00:41
bipartisan support. That is, he01:00:43
barely sold this nuclear deal01:00:45
there, bypassing Congress, it was carried out, well,01:00:48
why did Trump easily withdraw from it01:00:50
because Congress could not approve it,01:00:53
that Obama did not have01:00:54
a majority, but that is, it turns out that01:00:57
Obama was not able to01:00:59
convince most of the people that it was necessary.01:01:03
Well, it must support it that this is kind of01:01:06
important.01:01:07
This is the problem, that is, you need to01:01:09
step over, that is, you need to, that is, in01:01:12
fact, you need to make an unpopular01:01:14
decision to step over your opponents,01:01:17
through yourself, through some members of your01:01:18
team who will not01:01:20
support and Well, again, it is advisable to01:01:23
probably do this with the allies so that01:01:25
it would be like a collegial decision. They01:01:27
did it with the Europeans, but Trump01:01:29
sent the Europeans to hell. They01:01:31
remained in the nuclear deal and the01:01:33
Europeans still formally remain. None of01:01:35
them withdrew except the United States, but01:01:37
since the states withdrew. And this was the key01:01:39
moment, then accordingly the story went01:01:42
that it was kind of useless to keep it afloat,01:01:46
well, that is, again, we need to work with Israel01:01:49
because Israel is one of the heads,01:01:51
as they write correctly, in my chat, well, in the chat01:01:52
that yes Israel01:01:56
and especially Trump when he came to01:01:58
the authorities, that is, it means they need to somehow01:02:01
come to an agreement with Israel and to come to an agreement with01:02:03
Israel, something needs to be done,01:02:04
some kind of miracle, so that they and Iran01:02:07
stop perceiving themselves as01:02:08
existential enemies, how to do this01:02:10
is not clear In short, that is, these are all01:02:13
very complex things and I think because01:02:15
of the complexity of this issue Well,01:02:17
North Korea doesn’t want to deal with this, the01:02:19
same story, that is, North Korea,01:02:21
again, as you imagine01:02:23
Let’s forget everything, lift the sanctions on North01:02:25
Korea01:02:26
Well, that is, most likely,01:02:29
if sanctions are lifted from North Korea01:02:31
needs no I can’t imagine this I I The fact is01:02:33
that look how interested I am in01:02:34
their line of thought Well, okay, let’s01:02:38
assume that all these countries01:02:41
rushed into each other’s arms out of despair and that means01:02:44
they are pursuing such a military-style policy01:02:48
as would be aimed at the01:02:50
destruction of various territories and people,01:02:53
as if to confront the West Yes, but01:02:56
well, sort of01:02:57
Okay, that is, where will their thought01:03:00
lead the Americans, as it were, in this regard?01:03:02
Well, well, despair is not an axis of evil, it is an01:03:05
axis of despair. And what does this mean that this is not01:03:09
united forever, that is, it means that these01:03:12
countries can be convinced, they need to be01:03:15
offered some kind of alternative with That01:03:18
is, this is a signal for public01:03:19
discussion, that is, it needs to be launched01:03:21
so that everyone understands the complexity That is,01:03:23
if because look if it’s01:03:24
strategic there, how is it friendship without01:03:27
borders As they called01:03:34
Chinese-Russian Well okay Well yes I01:03:36
see And if there is a chance So it01:03:38
needs to be spoken out, as it seems to me, yes,01:03:40
that is, I think that there is a chance, as if01:03:42
I don’t see Until everything is lost Well,01:03:44
completely, plus there are, again, a lot of01:03:48
contradictions on which can be played01:03:49
between Russia and Iran Russia and North01:03:51
Korea North Korea and China China01:03:53
Russia We know this even We know this, we01:03:55
are working on it there about China01:03:57
Siberia, more precisely this Far East, that’s01:04:01
the question I’m just saying this It’s a01:04:04
question of political will at one01:04:05
time, the states managed to win01:04:07
China over to their side against the Soviet01:04:09
Union In the seventy-first year Uh-huh Well, somehow01:04:11
they managed to do something where these01:04:13
were also ideological opponents, also01:04:15
communists Mauz Dong Well, how01:04:18
were they also there axis Well also evil in some way01:04:21
to some extent Well they didn’t mind they were with01:04:23
Kissinger They went and decided something01:04:27
and how Well it paid off well against them And01:04:30
how did they do it they01:04:32
took advantage of the fact that01:04:33
tension had grown between the Soviet Union and China they01:04:36
quarreled and they, as it were, immediately01:04:42
injected the01:04:44
People's Republic of China into the UN and01:04:47
gave the right to Veta to the UN Security Council. That is, they included01:04:49
it in their security architecture And01:04:52
thereby they gave China01:04:56
guarantees plus recognized its status and for01:04:58
this how if only China had opened01:05:01
the markets, that is, it’s clear there Now01:05:03
no one is demanding that North Korea be given the01:05:06
right to veto the owls without the UN, but01:05:09
some things, I think, somewhere on01:05:11
which negotiations can be held along some lines,01:05:13
especially such the negotiations were01:05:14
not unprecedented. That is, the01:05:16
States had examples of flexibility when they01:05:19
showed them of political pragmatism.01:05:21
Maybe now everything is more complicated because,01:05:24
well, the opinion between01:05:26
Democrats and Republicans is very polarized, that is, a01:05:27
very polarized discussion and greater01:05:29
transparency, less, as it were, less01:05:32
is impossible. We need to throw in more resources01:05:33
in order to communicate with this, you need to somehow,01:05:35
yes, and well, plus polarization. It01:05:38
really influences because, well, you01:05:39
see. That is, there are 180° turns Every01:05:42
time during administrations and Well, yes, there are, yes, there are some01:05:45
difficulties, plus, of course, the fact01:05:48
that now, well, in Iran, at01:05:51
least now, the people in power are01:05:52
also quite complex, that is,01:05:54
it’s difficult with them, they are01:05:57
mostly conservatives, well, in short, it’s more difficult with them01:06:00
than with the moderate reformers who01:06:03
were before under Hassan Rouhani, that is,01:06:05
in this regard, the states could again01:06:07
either wait until they come to power01:06:09
or somehow, well, I don’t know, make it01:06:11
so that they come to power. Because it01:06:14
was much easier for them to negotiate with the01:06:16
moderates. Because they are just01:06:18
supporters. Well, the development of relations with the01:06:20
West is how they They think that01:06:22
the West is largely to blame, but in principle01:06:24
we need to live with them more, but now01:06:27
the conservatives are in power, of course, this also01:06:29
affects the fact that there are difficult people there, you seem to be like01:06:32
this Yes, I remain01:06:36
a supporter of the fact that, well, the states can01:06:39
negotiate with Moreover, having such01:06:42
influence, especially in the world01:06:44
financial economic institutions, they01:06:46
can negotiate with countries with01:06:48
China, but they negotiate. Well, we01:06:50
see that there were meetings. They have now01:06:52
put their acute phase of01:06:54
competition into this, I call it the phase of01:06:57
cold détente, yeah, with since last01:07:00
year when Biden met with United01:07:02
Pin, somehow everything has calmed down for them, both01:07:04
on Taiwan and on many other01:07:07
issues. Well, that is, there are opportunities01:07:09
to discuss something correctly, but I think01:07:11
that both with the Iranians and with North Korea there is01:07:14
North Korea is now frozen01:07:15
Negotiations due to the fact that the01:07:16
Biden Administration is passive in this01:07:19
matter I don’t know For what reason01:07:22
negotiations have been going on with Iran all this time even01:07:24
now Yes, negotiations are already underway in the North Army of this story01:07:28
through intermediaries, but that’s why they are going on01:07:30
Well, plus elections maybe the elections are01:07:34
also interfering with 100% interference before the elections, yes,01:07:37
making a deal with Iran is such a01:07:38
question Well, yes Well, something like this Therefore,01:07:41
yes, I agree with the thesis of this article, I will01:07:44
formulate it differently, but yes, I01:07:46
think that this is more of a situational01:07:48
partnership despair, not despair, but01:07:50
because of the narrowness of the corridor of01:07:52
possibilities 100% Well, that is, the01:07:54
way out is to expand this corridor, be that as01:07:56
it may, and its expansion without01:07:58
discussion is impossible by and large,01:08:00
especially in the current conditions Ponya And01:08:03
let’s have this one too Let's answer the question How01:08:05
likely is it that economic pressure and the01:08:07
collapse of China's economy will prompt them to start a01:08:10
war in order to keep hundreds of01:08:12
millions of unemployed people from revolting?01:08:14
Who knows? Perhaps if there is a direct01:08:17
collapse, probably they can, of course, uh Well, they01:08:22
probably can, but I'm not sure what01:08:24
will happen in the near future the collapse of the Chinese01:08:26
economy is a real collapse, such that they01:08:28
will be forced to go to01:08:29
war, I don’t know. It seems to you that no one can01:08:33
answer this question exactly, what01:08:37
could it be, but it will depend,01:08:39
firstly,01:08:41
on Well, the scale of the collapse depends01:08:46
on the attitude towards the idea in general like this kind of01:08:49
war among the leaders of China, people01:08:53
make a decision and not a robot that is01:08:55
scripted there to collapse, and we start01:08:57
a war there and a button is pressed, that is,01:08:59
specific people make a decision there,01:09:01
they may not make a decision at all.01:09:03
Well, that is, I think it’s like this for now01:09:06
yes, these are conditions of complete01:09:08
non-obviousness, that is, So far there is no01:09:10
such01:09:13
obvious Chinese economy plus,01:09:16
as I understand it, well, whatever it is, the01:09:18
Chinese economy is still part of the01:09:21
larger world economy, if there is a01:09:23
collapse of the Chinese economy, it will be uh I01:09:27
think that’s where we are then01:09:30
turbulence is scary Let’s say after01:09:33
our01:09:37
war it’s also difficult Well, okay, so01:09:40
Dmitry Komarov wrote, not the01:09:42
powerful diplomacy in Russia, I mean the01:09:44
special services and there is something to offer there,01:09:46
even a turkey would cope with such data, their01:09:49
diplomacy is powerful, the special services too,01:09:52
but they have01:09:54
diplomacy diplomacy plus special services01:09:56
are like one thing Well, that is, this is01:09:58
the special services one not sometimes one sometimes not01:10:00
not theirs not I mean, look, if you01:10:02
also take a diplomatic01:10:04
school there, there is a school of regionalist specialists01:10:07
there, Arabiston, it is stronger than ours, I01:10:10
can confidently see the difference, yes that01:10:13
is, it’s like, unfortunately, this is the case, for this01:10:16
reason we also need to01:10:17
prepare and build our own diplomatic school. Diplomats as01:10:20
negotiators, their functionality01:10:22
may be small, but they play, that’s why01:10:24
everything needs to be done only for the special services,01:10:26
this is also primitivism,01:10:28
so inside it’s clear that Russian01:10:31
diplomacy has no people who do01:10:34
not interact in any way with the01:10:37
intelligence service. We remember that when01:10:39
all sorts of diplomatic and security service01:10:41
scandals arise, they expel01:10:43
diplomats for a reason because this is,01:10:44
as it were, a rule. Well, because01:10:46
they work in embassies, among other things. Yes,01:10:47
security service officers do this in all countries.01:10:49
and everyone01:10:51
knows this, yes, thank you, thanks for the01:10:55
polab channel, which he represents together with01:10:58
Alina Gritsenko, who is not here today,01:11:00
subscribe to the polab channel, the link01:11:02
is right there in the title of our broadcast. You can01:11:05
go there. There is also the same01:11:07
broadcast that we are doing, so01:11:10
you can go there to open01:11:12
like the same broadcast also there and01:11:14
everyone will be pleased Thank you for01:11:18
watching us Thanks to everyone who supports both the01:11:20
polab channel and the Amedia channel with their01:11:23
sponsorship VMI, this all helps the guys01:11:27
in particular And we, too, in Alpha, move01:11:30
forward In the common interests and for the sake of01:11:33
continue to work for you every day01:11:36
in your interests Yes, everyone subscribe01:11:39
to Alpha also on telegram and don’t01:11:41
forget Assad’s mustache there is a channel on01:11:43
telegram or mustache and sign up for01:11:46
sponsorship join01:11:47
our golden billion01:11:50
Duck golden you are billion yes01:11:54
come on Well, today it will be in01:11:56
literally 45 minutes broadcast with Arrestovich, the01:12:00
war diary on01:12:02
Mondays, so to speak, returned to01:12:04
its traditional time. Therefore,01:12:07
stay with us, bye-bye01:12:12
[music]01:12:18
[music]01:12:25
LDescription:
⚡️Подписывайтесь на ALPHA MEDIA telegram: https://t.me/alphamediaua 2:32 История термина “Золотой миллиард”. Где возник этот термин? На Западе термина не существует. 14:46 Россия вывела использование термина “Золотой миллиард” на новый уровень. Россия использует термин как ресентимент. 22:20 Откуда появилась конспирологическая теория “Золотой миллиард”? 28:26 Упоминание телеграммы Кеннана. 30:23 Примеры применения термина в риторике российских политических деятелей. Почему “Золотой миллиард”? 35:28 Сейчас главная задача российского руководства навязать “Золотой миллиард” на мировом уровне. 40:35 По логике в России тоже есть “Золотой миллиард”. 45:46 Что вызывает войны: перенаселение, экономический бум или политические интересы? 50:53 Трамп для Китая опасен? Стратегические визии Байдена и Трампа относительно Китая. 53:43 Китай старается подмять российскую экономику под себя, чтобы Россия была зависима от них при любом президенте. 55:11 Союз России, КНДР, Китая и Ирана — это союз отчаяния? 59:14 Союз России, КНДР, Китая и Ирана можно разломать, если Запад станет более гибким. 1:02:35 Что для Запада дает понимание того, что союз России, КНДР, Китая и Ирана — это союз отчаяния? Есть ли что-то о чем можно договариваться с этими странами? 1:09:40 У России мощная дипломатия и дипломатическая школа. Украине нужно выстраивать свою дипломатическую школу тоже. Анализ ключевых событий мировой политики. В этом выпуске: - Что за теория "золотого миллиарда"? - Действительно ли миром управляет "золотой миллиард"? - Глобальный нарратив РФ в противостоянии с Западом - Суть раскола Запада и не-Запада Приєднуйтесь до нашої соцмережі "Альфа", все тільки починається 😉 Якщо у вас айфон: https://apps.apple.com/ua/app/alpha-net/id6446601153?l=uk Якщо у вас андроід: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=club.alphamedia Подпишись: 🔹 Николай Фельдман 👉 https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser 🔹 Николай Фельдман 👉 https://t.me/feldman_nick 🔹 Илия Куса 👉 https://t.me/AssadStash 🔹 Алина Гриценко 👉 https://t.me/dragon_ryuu 💥 Вы можете поддержать канал, став его спонсором: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfPM3SfE-9MvIPujzTgCJHA/join 💥 Реквизиты для поддержки проекта: Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/ALPHAMEDIA559 ☕️buymeacoffee ➜ https://buymeacoffee.com/alphamediaua Bitcoin ➜ bc1qrtm8kcq7gph3fha6t5fkk99gkrn4nknx9g09wz ETH (сеть ETH) ➜ 0x28E66803Df33a46405cC9EA89B58Fa41b9724a56 👕 НАШ МЕРЧ. Магазин "Alpha-Media-Shop": Сайт - https://alpha-media.shop/ / Телеграм - https://t.me/alpha_media_ua (только по вопросам работы магазина) ⚡️ Онлайн-трансляция 24/7: https://www.youtube.com/live/Nt8TJRkiUuI ⚡️ Подпишитесь на канал и нажмите на колокольчик, чтобы получать оповещения о новых трансляциях!
Preparing download options
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB" video?
http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "Золотой миллиард | Илия Куса, Николай Фельдман | @POLIT_LAB"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.