Download "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью"

Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.

Previous video: ⚡️ФЕЙГИН & БЕЛКОВСКИЙ: Шокирующая ПРАВДА о Путине и его окружении. Коррупция Уничтожает Россию Next video: Родная говень отблагодарила крымчан

Родная говень отблагодарила крымчан

Родная говень отблагодарила крымчан

⚡️ФЕЙГИН & БЕЛКОВСКИЙ: Шокирующая ПРАВДА о Путине и его окружении. Коррупция Уничтожает Россию

⚡️ФЕЙГИН & БЕЛКОВСКИЙ: Шокирующая ПРАВДА о Путине и его окружении. Коррупция Уничтожает Россию

Channel: 24 Канал

⚡️ КНДР на службе Кремля | Наступление ВСУ под Изюмом | Пропаганда против Пугачевой

⚡️ КНДР на службе Кремля | Наступление ВСУ под Изюмом | Пропаганда против Пугачевой

Channel: Популярная политика

ЕС покупает танки для РФ?

ЕС покупает танки для РФ?

Channel: Анатолий Шарий

"Украинцы оснащенные, хитрые и коварные" - в эфире Скабеевой уже хвалят ВСУ. Толи еще будет!

"Украинцы оснащенные, хитрые и коварные" - в эфире Скабеевой уже хвалят ВСУ. Толи еще будет!

"Победа будет за Украиной. А россии не отмыться" - Виктор Суворов

"Победа будет за Украиной. А россии не отмыться" - Виктор Суворов

СПИВАК: МАСКИ СБРОШЕНЫ! ЗАЛУЖНОМУ СКАЗАЛИ НЕТ! ДЫРЯВЫЙ ЗОНТИК НАТО! ЗЕЛЕНСКИЙ в ДАВОСЕ

СПИВАК: МАСКИ СБРОШЕНЫ! ЗАЛУЖНОМУ СКАЗАЛИ НЕТ! ДЫРЯВЫЙ ЗОНТИК НАТО! ЗЕЛЕНСКИЙ в ДАВОСЕ

Channel: Politeka Online

Спецназ РФ ФСЁ - несите новый

Спецназ РФ ФСЁ - несите новый

The end is near! Energy of Ukraine is at the POINT OF NO RETURN

The end is near! Energy of Ukraine is at the POINT OF NO RETURN

Channel: Геоэнергетика ИНФО

Вести недели с Дмитрием Киселевым от 21.04.2024

Вести недели с Дмитрием Киселевым от 21.04.2024

Channel: Вести Недели

новости

политика

итоги года

итоги года 2023

сша

америка

трамп

выборы в сша

сво

спецоперация

украина

зеленский

запад

нато

армения

азербайджан

пво

вооружение

путин

владимир зеленский

санкции

экономика

ес

евросоюз

украинский конфликт

дипломатия

одкб

россия

00:00:02

viewers Today our guest is my

00:00:04

favorite historian, writer, member of the

00:00:07

central council of the party A Just

00:00:09

Russia for the Truth, whose books help

00:00:12

to understand the intricacies of world

00:00:14

geopolitics Nikolai Viktorovich Starikov

00:00:16

Nikolai Viktorovich Hello,

00:00:19

as they say He who does not know the past is

00:00:22

not worthy of the future Therefore,

00:00:25

today let’s sum up the results of the outgoing year and

00:00:28

look into the loom of

00:00:30

HIV. What events of

00:00:32

2023 in geopolitics do you consider

00:00:37

significant? Well, I think that really the

00:00:40

main event of 2023 is the

00:00:43

failed attempt of the West to inflict a

00:00:45

military defeat on Russia, that same counter-offensive,

00:00:48

but in fact the offensive of the Armed

00:00:51

Forces Ukraine I think that this is the event

00:00:54

that is already leaving a sulfur imprint

00:00:57

on international

00:00:58

politics in the year twenty-four

00:01:01

based on this event. The

00:01:04

power lines of the entire geopolitical situation will continue to line up.

00:01:07

I think that this is

00:01:09

really number one, everything

00:01:12

else is either more current or

00:01:16

so shallow something Well, for example, the struggle

00:01:18

between Republicans and Democrats in the

00:01:21

USA, it was there and will be and

00:01:24

one or the other wins in this

00:01:25

sense, nothing so significant

00:01:28

happens there, so it’s important for us too

00:01:31

But here is

00:01:34

just a situation that often occurs in history

00:01:36

when something happens in

00:01:38

Russia is key to the future

00:01:41

fate of the whole world Uh-huh And what do you think?

00:01:46

Could the West make an

00:01:48

attempt to freeze the conflict in

00:01:52

Ukraine next year since the West obviously tried

00:01:54

to use Ukraine as its

00:01:56

battering ram against Russia, but they

00:01:59

have stalled this matter and therefore if

00:02:01

the conflict will be frozen, then

00:02:04

NATO, for example, is deploying

00:02:06

its military infrastructure specifically on the

00:02:08

territory of Ukraine, and for now the West

00:02:12

is arranging conflicts for us in other places

00:02:15

to distract us. Will the West go to this

00:02:17

next year? What do you think? Well,

00:02:20

first, I would like to record this fact

00:02:21

we are dealing with with probably

00:02:25

the most serious rival that

00:02:28

anyone has ever had in the entire history of

00:02:30

mankind, this rival, on the one

00:02:33

hand, is a collective mind, but on the

00:02:35

other hand, the mind is very evil, very

00:02:38

specific

00:02:39

and ready for any crimes of

00:02:44

war, anything to achieve

00:02:46

its goals. Here, let's do this let

00:02:49

's fix the fact And then imagine a

00:02:51

chess game Well, you know, usually

00:02:53

they show one intelligent-looking person sitting in the

00:02:56

place of another intelligent-looking

00:02:59

me Well, we look there Sergei Koryakin

00:03:01

Well, the intellectual is a nice person Yes, you

00:03:05

need to understand that the grandmaster

00:03:06

who is sitting on the other side and

00:03:09

can also look very strange - to

00:03:15

embitter such a person during a chess game go

00:03:19

into hand-to-hand combat or try to hit

00:03:21

us on the head with the board break all

00:03:25

conceivable rules pull a piece from the board

00:03:28

do whatever you want This is the

00:03:30

second fact We must also

00:03:32

take into account now we move on to

00:03:34

your question based on understanding

00:03:37

who we are dealing with, can the West

00:03:40

try to freeze the conflict, maybe

00:03:43

if it sees that it has no

00:03:45

chance of victory, of course, and these

00:03:48

attempts to prepare a freeze, they have already

00:03:52

been visible Well, what is it worth at least It would seem

00:03:55

such a

00:03:56

trifle to nominate the president

00:04:00

for the figure Man of the Year in the magazine This is

00:04:05

not just a magazine This is not just a nomination

00:04:07

that is there, well, I don’t know, the boys and

00:04:10

girls in this magazine make

00:04:13

certain advances, I will remind you that in

00:04:17

1938 the man of the year on the cover of

00:04:21

this magazine was Adolf Hitler

00:04:23

because in thirty dem he should have

00:04:26

start a war, well, it didn’t start a little the way

00:04:29

those who brought Hitler to

00:04:31

power wanted, but nevertheless, that is, this is some kind of

00:04:33

international apotheosis. If you

00:04:35

want international recognition, that is, here

00:04:38

he is, the Great

00:04:40

Greatest, but something needs to be done for this. Let’s

00:04:44

remember last year on the cover of

00:04:46

Time magazine there was Zelensky, why was he

00:04:49

in the twenty-second year because in the

00:04:51

twenty-third year

00:04:54

the same offensive of the Ukrainian

00:04:57

army was supposed to begin, which was associated with

00:04:58

Zelensky, he was formally led and for

00:05:02

which he was given money to arm

00:05:04

American advisers, Polish soldiers,

00:05:06

and so on and so forth similar That is, these

00:05:08

were such drum beats before

00:05:11

the opening of the scenes in this terrible

00:05:14

performance. And now

00:05:17

imagine the offensive fails and it comes to someone’s

00:05:20

mind in this magazine,

00:05:24

at least among various figures,

00:05:27

but to suggest a president, there was a

00:05:29

president of Ukraine whom the West

00:05:31

supported A let's

00:05:33

put the President of Russia on the cover next year

00:05:35

This is an invitation to some kind of

00:05:38

diplomatic dance This is an advance,

00:05:41

this is a proposal In this way, well It

00:05:44

would seem frivolous, in

00:05:48

fact, it is extremely serious What the

00:05:50

President answered Here is his Direct line The

00:05:53

President

00:05:55

of Sovereignty Tom

00:05:58

Sure begins to defend that without him there is nothing

00:06:01

cannot be in the state. I think that you

00:06:03

and I will absolutely agree with this

00:06:04

thesis. And then the president answers the

00:06:07

question when peace is possible and he says

00:06:10

peace is possible when we achieve our

00:06:12

goals, we are Russia. That is, he rejects

00:06:16

this very diplomatic dance. This is this

00:06:19

proposal, this this the trap is that it is

00:06:22

possible to

00:06:24

somehow restore the

00:06:28

trust and

00:06:30

relations of cougars destroyed by the West, first the cover then

00:06:33

then then everyone starts shaking hands and

00:06:35

inviting people to the G20 where they weren’t invited. Well, that

00:06:37

is, they offered mirrors and beads

00:06:41

again and the

00:06:43

president rejected all this, only

00:06:46

conversations are possible after achieving

00:06:49

Victory after achieving the goals, therefore,

00:06:52

when you say the West will try, the West is

00:06:54

already trying to arrange this very

00:06:56

freeze, Russia’s answer is no, there

00:07:00

will be no freeze And I honestly say I was

00:07:04

very pleased with such a clear and

00:07:07

transparent position of our president

00:07:09

because from all the information that we

00:07:11

received in the third year I probably the

00:07:16

greatest concern was caused by the

00:07:18

constant conversations that

00:07:20

some kind of negotiations were possible. This was what caused the

00:07:22

greatest concern in the

00:07:25

fact that

00:07:28

the point was set for me, but the West will

00:07:32

again draw an ellipsis, he will again

00:07:33

propose, again try to do something

00:07:36

because this is a minister who has

00:07:38

a goal but no no principles as soon as

00:07:41

they lose on the battlefield Let's

00:07:43

negotiate, don't want to negotiate

00:07:45

Let's try again on the battlefield,

00:07:47

you can't relax, I'm sure that they

00:07:49

will constantly be preparing some

00:07:52

unpleasant surprises for

00:07:55

our attacks at the front, perhaps an attempt at

00:07:58

some kind of counter-offensive by the Armed Forces, anything

00:08:01

can happen we just have to understand

00:08:03

who we’re dealing with, not give in to the desire to

00:08:07

reduce tensions at the expense of our own

00:08:09

interests, and do what we have to do.

00:08:14

Now let’s go a little lower to the

00:08:17

Southern Territories. What do you think, what

00:08:20

happened this year with

00:08:22

Nagorno-Karabakh is really a

00:08:25

situation Is the Armed Forces a thing of the past in history?

00:08:28

That’s all,

00:08:30

or will there be some kind of continuation, especially

00:08:32

considering that the President of Azerbaijan,

00:08:35

for some reason unknown to us,

00:08:37

is announcing early

00:08:41

elections? Well, probably, if there had not been

00:08:44

a situation in Ukraine, we could have

00:08:46

said that the unfolding of events

00:08:50

around Nagorno-Karabakh is one

00:08:53

of the most important events of the outgoing

00:08:57

year, what happened there there is

00:09:00

still no understanding of the end of

00:09:03

this process because in politics

00:09:05

very often the end of the process goes

00:09:07

somewhere beyond the horizon, but then the peaceful

00:09:12

settlement of the

00:09:13

Karabakh issue that happened,

00:09:15

it happened due to the interests of one

00:09:17

side, it was not a compromise, it was the

00:09:21

surrender of the positions of one Rhone to another, approximately

00:09:25

the scale is different, but for example it

00:09:28

looked like

00:09:29

Perestroika and new thinking with an emphasis

00:09:32

on which Gorbachev constantly advertised;

00:09:35

simply Gorbachev, as

00:09:37

the leader of the Soviet Union, took all the

00:09:40

interests of all

00:09:41

allies, the whole meaning of the Soviet Union is

00:09:44

simply refused it Well, and passed it off

00:09:47

as a Great Diplomatic

00:09:50

Victory, and here one side in this

00:09:53

case is definitely Armenia and Karabakh

00:09:58

Azer, to state for sure around this, the

00:10:02

dances of the West immediately began, attempts to pull Armenia away

00:10:05

from Russia sharply intensified and

00:10:08

increased, and this happens in this

00:10:10

form which, again, It would seem, well,

00:10:13

slightly innocent, but there is no smell of innocence there.

00:10:15

Armenia and Western states

00:10:18

are making a statement What is buying weapons

00:10:20

in France is the question If Armenia is a member of the

00:10:25

CSTO military bloc Why buy weapons in France

00:10:28

what is uh refusal to supply Russian

00:10:31

weapons is military standards is

00:10:35

some kind of tradition Well, let's

00:10:37

remember again, Turkey, a NATO country

00:10:41

is buying several Russian S-300

00:10:44

EE air defense systems. So, what a Cry begins

00:10:48

in NATO, the point is not that Turkey

00:10:51

will have some other system, but the point is

00:10:53

that Turkey begins rapprochement with

00:10:55

Russia by purchasing these same S-300s,

00:10:59

this is unacceptable against Turkey,

00:11:01

certain military

00:11:03

political sanctions are immediately introduced there, they are trying to

00:11:06

persuade it to refuse to buy these

00:11:07

weapons, and this is done by the Americans,

00:11:10

who Well, it would seem, well, what

00:11:12

will happen there, Turkey won’t make any difference You are

00:11:14

so powerful, strong and great No, it’s a

00:11:17

matter of principle, it’s a matter of a trend, it’s a matter of the

00:11:20

direction of communication between countries,

00:11:23

so when the Armenian leadership does not

00:11:25

deny but also does not confirm the purchase of

00:11:28

weapons from France, this is a very alarming

00:11:31

bell. Please note that the European Union,

00:11:35

for the sake of this, is the

00:11:38

Ottawa of Armenia from Russia he decided to

00:11:42

worsen relations with Azerbaijan and the

00:11:45

President of Azerbaijan

00:11:47

simply did not even come to one of the events in Europe,

00:11:49

and now Azerbaijan officially declares

00:11:51

that Europe is taking a friendly

00:11:53

position for the sake of friendship with Armenia, so

00:11:57

diplomacy is always such a tangle of

00:11:59

interests in decisions, but we see that for the sake

00:12:02

of in order to try to destroy the Udkb

00:12:04

to destroy the friendship between Russia and Armenia,

00:12:07

which in fact is primarily

00:12:10

important for Armenia but is also significant for Russia,

00:12:12

the West is ready to temporarily quarrel

00:12:15

with Azerbaijan because it believes

00:12:18

that relations with Azerbaijan will

00:12:20

simply be maintained through Turkey,

00:12:22

which is also in one or the other to a different

00:12:24

extent Well, a member of the Western Alliance, albeit

00:12:27

such a special one, this is what we see,

00:12:31

this is what we see, and of course, the action of the

00:12:34

Armenian leadership causes us

00:12:36

serious concern. Uh-huh. What do you

00:12:39

think about the history in the Middle East? The

00:12:43

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is a

00:12:45

protracted conflict or will it soon

00:12:48

will be resolved

00:12:50

somehow Well, look, it’s very good that

00:12:54

you asked this question after the question about

00:12:56

relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan about

00:12:59

Karabakh. It would seem that the problem

00:13:01

that was inside the Soviet Union is

00:13:04

insignificant and not significant and the historical

00:13:08

problem that existed but within the framework of the

00:13:11

Soviet Union has gone

00:13:12

somewhere into the past suddenly appeared against the

00:13:15

backdrop of the destruction of the Soviet Union and even

00:13:17

largely

00:13:18

served as the reason for the destruction of the USSR because

00:13:23

the situation in Azerbaijan in Karabakh then

00:13:26

pogroms arose under the living and

00:13:29

functioning Soviet government and

00:13:31

leadership of the Soviet Union and suddenly this

00:13:33

problem that could not be solved for 30 years

00:13:35

decided Well, how it was decided You and I have

00:13:39

already discussed the matter here, not

00:13:41

in Well, as they say, not in some

00:13:44

training manual, and here there is an Arab-Israeli

00:13:46

conflict that has been going on for eight decades and

00:13:50

which has not been resolved, so the conclusion from this

00:13:53

suggests itself for the next long-term

00:13:55

conflict Even if it it seems

00:13:59

maybe Ren if both sides are ready to

00:14:01

resolve the second issue

00:14:04

as by surrendering the position of one side

00:14:08

by finding a compromise, and here

00:14:10

we see, unfortunately, a sad trend

00:14:13

since the positions of the Arabs and Israelis Well, in

00:14:17

this case, the Palestinians and Israelis

00:14:19

under Iqa Rabi and the

00:14:27

head of the agreement were concluded

00:14:30

Nobel Prizes were received, that is, the

00:14:33

Peace Process began and, in fact, the path to the

00:14:37

restoration or creation of a

00:14:38

Palestinian state began. What was discussed

00:14:41

back in the late forties. And at

00:14:44

this moment, forces that are not

00:14:46

interested in calming the world on the

00:14:50

one hand are killing with the hands of some kind of

00:14:52

gender Isaac Arabina and on the other hand,

00:14:55

Yasser Arafat is dying and this is open

00:14:57

information, his widow did not agree with the

00:15:01

conclusions of the Doctors about the causes of Death, after

00:15:04

a while she even insisted on

00:15:08

certain procedures, she had a

00:15:12

brush from her deceased husband and traces of polonium were found on it,

00:15:16

that is, at the moment

00:15:18

we have every reason to believe that on the

00:15:20

one hand, Itza Rabin, as a leader of

00:15:23

peace on the Israeli side, was killed, and on the

00:15:26

other hand, I Arafat, as a

00:15:29

leader of peace on the Palestinian side, was poisoned,

00:15:32

this means that someone was very much

00:15:35

interested in ensuring that there was no peace

00:15:38

these were not Palestinians and not Israelis

00:15:40

because the simultaneous death of two

00:15:42

politicians in different

00:15:45

states who are connected by

00:15:47

peace initiatives tells us

00:15:50

that there is a third external force that is

00:15:52

regulated by

00:16:01

Rabin’s example for Israeli politicians

00:16:04

indicates a World Cup as soon as you

00:16:06

begin to negotiate with the Palestinians you

00:16:09

will be killed, this is understood by any

00:16:12

sane Israeli politician, on the other

00:16:15

hand, an example for the Palestinians if you

00:16:18

start these initiatives. Well,

00:16:21

perhaps your fate will be too much.

00:16:33

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority have

00:16:35

brought the conflict artificially to a

00:16:38

completely different point, and for the sake of this, everything

00:16:41

happened the most interesting thing is that in

00:16:43

today's situation, no one can

00:16:45

answer what will happen next, but perhaps

00:16:48

such a situation has not yet been present in this region,

00:16:50

that is, when they ask the

00:16:52

ASKh leaders what will happen

00:16:57

and

00:16:59

they ask the Israelis what will happen, well, the

00:17:03

answers are extremely vague, we will defeat

00:17:06

Hamas, well, well, somehow it will defeat or

00:17:09

declare that you defeated it. And that there

00:17:12

will be some kind of buffer zone on the territory of the Gaza Strip,

00:17:14

that is,

00:17:17

imagine today how before the Hamas attack on

00:17:20

Israel the whole story looked like there is a

00:17:27

strong powerful fence with all the technical

00:17:30

innovations with automatic machine guns

00:17:33

where machine gunners sit remotely and

00:17:35

those watching there and anyone, this is a

00:17:39

buffer zone, it stands on the border of

00:17:42

Israel and Israel, as it were, there are already some

00:17:47

civilians of Israel or military

00:17:49

settlements or barracks located there,

00:17:51

kilometer 2 3 5 10 15, the city of Sderot

00:17:55

is located there That is, if you retinue even

00:17:58

further that is, to the territory of the

00:18:00

Gaza Strip Well, how much, well, for 2 km 5 10 what

00:18:04

will change you will have not one fence but

00:18:07

two fences, that is, the very conversation about the fact

00:18:10

that we will create a buffer zone does

00:18:13

not solve the problem at all because you are

00:18:16

leaving this buffer zone Gaza Strip

00:18:18

Israel I mean, you built it and

00:18:21

it worked. So there was no fly in the air

00:18:24

in the literal sense of the word, and

00:18:26

suddenly one fine day all this

00:18:27

turned out that the

00:18:29

Israeli military for some reason did not

00:18:31

believe the other Israeli military

00:18:33

just because they were women, what

00:18:35

if you are so untrusting, why are you calling them into the

00:18:37

army then

00:18:43

even calling up a damn thing? This

00:18:46

means that Israel does not explain what

00:18:48

will happen next, there is some kind of big

00:18:51

question mark. I believe that the situation is not

00:18:55

clear, some kind of large-scale that

00:18:59

is the goal of this today’s

00:19:02

escalation. But tell us, when we always

00:19:05

talk about the Middle East, we always

00:19:08

talk about the topic there: Israel

00:19:10

Palestine, the United States of America, who

00:19:13

might benefit from this, who might be a

00:19:15

screenwriter and director there? And you don’t

00:19:17

consider the religious background here; the

00:19:23

religious background is very important;

00:19:28

attention is definitely just let’s

00:19:30

understand on what level, we must take this

00:19:34

factor into account, maybe for everyone,

00:19:37

maybe for several. Well, look,

00:19:40

let's take an example. Well, I don’t know the

00:19:42

Third

00:19:44

Reich, a SS soldier who fought

00:19:47

somewhere on the Eastern Front,

00:19:49

brought up as a man

00:19:56

-hater,

00:19:58

he had an ideology. Well, of course, and a

00:20:02

terrible ideology then she was tried at the

00:20:04

Nuremberg trials, can we say

00:20:06

that all the German Soldiers, how many of them

00:20:09

I know, there were 6-10 million who

00:20:11

were on all fronts were

00:20:13

completely inveterate by the

00:20:15

Nazis Well, no, someone was taken away, someone

00:20:19

was drafted into the army and there

00:20:22

someone tried to survive - then he committed war

00:20:24

crimes, what is called with

00:20:25

pleasure, someone guarded

00:20:27

the concentration,

00:20:29

in fact, in this process the

00:20:31

entire German People were not tried, but the SS was tried

00:20:34

as an organization of specific figures, and

00:20:37

whoever deserved it either went to prison or

00:20:40

was hanged, and we also had

00:20:43

trials where Nazi

00:20:45

criminals And I emphasize the Germans,

00:20:48

they hung not only what kind of Vlasovites

00:20:51

the Germans were,

00:20:53

the news we see the ideology was present at the

00:20:57

Lower level, we move further to the level of,

00:21:01

say,

00:21:02

the generals, there were absolutely inveterate

00:21:05

Nazis as the first

00:21:07

commander of the Sixth

00:21:09

Army Reichenau was

00:21:12

simply the most cruel person, but he

00:21:15

died quickly For natural reasons and further

00:21:17

Here is

00:21:19

Paulus took over the leadership of this

00:21:21

military structure were those who were hanged

00:21:24

at the Jurassic trial because they

00:21:25

gave orders to shoot without

00:21:28

trial Russian Jews

00:21:30

Communist Commissars Which went beyond the scope of any

00:21:33

morality that is inherent in the military, that is, in

00:21:35

appearance like a German military man but in

00:21:38

fact an absolutely criminal and Nazi the

00:21:40

next level we rise even higher

00:21:43

Hitler did he have an ideology Well, it

00:21:47

seems to me the answer to this question is

00:21:49

positive Of course he was one of the

00:21:51

main ideologists of the creation of Nazism as an

00:21:54

ideology wrote a

00:21:57

book gave inhumane orders And

00:22:01

now the next level And those who

00:22:03

helped Hitler come to power with them

00:22:05

there was an ideology. I don’t mean

00:22:08

some German industrialists who

00:22:10

started giving money to Hitler in

00:22:12

1932, when it became clear to them that this

00:22:13

strange

00:22:15

man would soon lead Germany and they had to be

00:22:18

friends with him, otherwise it would be bad. I

00:22:21

mean those who are foreign politicians.

00:22:24

carried out the Dawes Plan, the Young Plan,

00:22:27

these are American

00:22:28

politicians who stopped collecting

00:22:30

reparations from Germany and, on the contrary, began

00:22:32

to invest money in German

00:22:33

industry, what kind of ideology

00:22:35

did they have, well, it’s unlikely they probably had an

00:22:37

ideology, a misanthrope, a

00:22:53

political

00:22:55

tool for them is not an ideology, but a

00:22:58

policy, but even now the most important one

00:23:01

the question is those Who led the American

00:23:05

politicians those who Well, roughly speaking, the

00:23:08

owners of the world's money they did it

00:23:11

Why do they have as much money as they want? They

00:23:13

drew it out of thin air. They need power over the

00:23:15

whole world, why, in order to

00:23:18

fulfill certain ideological

00:23:21

postulates, these postulates can be

00:23:23

they? are religious, it may be

00:23:28

difficult to say, but we see now that

00:23:29

Western society is driven by absolutely

00:23:33

irrational motives, that is, the motive of

00:23:36

making money no longer

00:23:38

works there, so imposing

00:23:41

sexual perversions on all these genders is for

00:23:43

money. Well, maybe for a clinic

00:23:45

where children are mutilated. That’s earning money for her

00:23:48

money Well, for the President of

00:23:50

the United States or the Chancellor of Germany, why is this,

00:23:53

but he understands that in today's

00:23:55

Western political system this

00:23:58

is a system for recognizing

00:24:00

someone else. If you do not agree with these

00:24:03

postulates, you can call them

00:24:05

ideological, then you have no

00:24:08

political prospects, you will not be allowed into

00:24:10

the political system of any Western

00:24:13

state, the same thing is present

00:24:15

in the Middle East. Moreover, this is the

00:24:18

point where all world

00:24:20

religions intersect, here we can, so to speak,

00:24:25

remember the features of Judaism and the historical fate of the Jews, here we can

00:24:27

talk about the fact that for Muslims this is an

00:24:29

important place, we can talk the fact that

00:24:31

this is a sacred place for Christians is the most

00:24:33

important

00:24:35

point from all points of view, so when

00:24:38

we evaluate these processes, of course we need

00:24:41

to add something Well, rather not

00:24:43

religious But I would say metaphysical

00:24:45

This will be more important because

00:24:48

sometimes the actions of Western politicians

00:24:51

like They don’t fit into the framework of some ideology of

00:24:52

some religion. But on the

00:24:56

other hand, we see that this is a downright

00:24:58

anti-Christian

00:25:06

doctrine, what can you say about this,

00:25:09

what is your opinion? Well, you

00:25:12

mean the Russian doctrine.

00:25:14

Well, there was a lot of talk about the use of nuclear

00:25:18

weapons and Honestly speaking,

00:25:20

I think they are Well, probably

00:25:24

wrong here in my opinion, the

00:25:26

correct position is the following

00:25:28

Russian nuclear doctrine, it gives a comprehensive

00:25:31

answer to all questions, that’s why it

00:25:32

was written, we can use nuclear

00:25:35

weapons in the event of nuclear weapons being used against us

00:25:37

and in the event of a threat to

00:25:40

Russian statehood. Well like this

00:25:42

If we summarize its main

00:25:45

postulates briefly This is how it will

00:25:47

sound Well, that’s all the conversation is about the fact that

00:25:51

Murov’s constant topic of nuclear weapons

00:25:53

against the backdrop of a special military operation Well, it

00:25:56

even seems to me somehow like disrespect

00:25:58

for our army, we think that

00:26:00

without nuclear weapons, we cannot solve

00:26:01

our problems. Well, of course we can. Please

00:26:04

note that now the conversations about

00:26:06

weapons have somehow died down a little

00:26:09

because the West would really like

00:26:12

to create some kind of provocation, including a

00:26:14

nuclear one of this kind, in order to

00:26:17

portray Russia as some kind of outcast

00:26:19

who allegedly used or did

00:26:22

something to solve his problems and

00:26:27

here are the conversations of some of our

00:26:29

experts. It seems to me that they have poured grist into the

00:26:33

mill of the opposite side. Therefore,

00:26:36

I propose here to simply record the

00:26:39

fact that the war with NATO will certainly

00:26:42

end in a nuclear war so that NATO

00:26:44

understands that we We will definitely use

00:26:47

nuclear weapons if they are used

00:26:49

against us. Still, we will achieve the remaining issues of a

00:26:52

special military operation

00:26:54

through the use of conventional

00:26:56

weapons, conventional weapons. Well, in

00:27:00

this direction, in fact, we will

00:27:02

continue to move. Yeah, what do you expect from the

00:27:06

coming year, where maybe

00:27:12

henna flared up again, but first turn, I

00:27:15

would like to see the

00:27:16

end of the special military

00:27:18

operation, if here I quote

00:27:22

the president, the set goals will be achieved, here is

00:27:24

peace at any cost,

00:27:28

at the cost of abandoning the goals for which the

00:27:30

special military

00:27:31

operation began, this is not peace. A

00:27:35

truce therefore we should not agree to such a peace

00:27:40

because we will simply pass

00:27:42

the baton solving

00:27:45

certain issues by armed means for our children and

00:27:47

grandchildren and for the West. This would be a huge

00:27:49

gift, so here,

00:27:56

in essence, the Civil within the Russian

00:27:59

people will be feasted and eliminated.

00:28:02

Moreover, you need to understand that after the victorious

00:28:04

end of a special military operation,

00:28:06

Russia is really strengthening.

00:28:08

Please note that at first the West

00:28:11

He said a lot that Russia

00:28:13

showed its weakness there, and so

00:28:15

on and so forth, simply because

00:28:18

the deadlines that they themselves, I

00:28:20

mean, the Westerners wrote in their own

00:28:22

newspapers for solving our problems, from their

00:28:26

point of view, we did not achieve and did not set

00:28:28

such a task. Well, I think that we can

00:28:31

now say with enough confidence

00:28:33

that Russia, when initially starting a

00:28:36

special military operation, was preparing,

00:28:38

well, not for a short-term large-scale combat

00:28:42

activity, but for a certain

00:28:45

special operation that

00:28:47

would quickly solve a number of problems because

00:28:50

that side would show some kind of

00:28:53

prudence Well, pay attention, the

00:28:56

negotiation process began there and

00:28:58

this is what was going on, and the West

00:29:01

essentially forbade negotiations in

00:29:03

Istanbul and beyond. Everything developed as

00:29:05

you and I know, it developed, this does not

00:29:08

indicate the weakness of Russia. This indicates

00:29:10

that Russia did not want to fight, just like that

00:29:14

this is a key moment and now when the army is

00:29:18

drawn into hostilities When

00:29:20

the people are drawn into hostilities what do I mean

00:29:23

by this

00:29:26

term some kind of routine we still

00:29:28

treat it Well, the heart bleeds As

00:29:31

they say Yes this is this this is

00:29:33

important but it seems to me Everyone already understands

00:29:37

what we are dealing with and that it is necessary to

00:29:41

end this victoriously by solving all the

00:29:44

problems, dismantling the regime that is there,

00:29:46

depriving it of the right to have

00:29:50

Armed Forces, taking certain

00:29:53

territories that are historically

00:29:56

Russian territories, well, here is

00:29:59

the question of a political settlement

00:30:00

after the victory, it is so politically

00:30:03

complex and Please note that the

00:30:06

Russian leadership does not reveal the map here, that is, there

00:30:09

are certain such contours, but

00:30:12

at the moment we cannot say that this is how this is how this is how,

00:30:14

because the

00:30:17

Russian leadership did not pose the question like that, so

00:30:20

after the end of

00:30:24

its victorious war, Russia will strengthen not only

00:30:26

territorially, not only morally, but

00:30:31

here’s the question: Where will the

00:30:35

whole thing go? I’ll tell you where the whole thing will be

00:30:38

dismantled. Like today’s military

00:30:39

instrument, but specific people, specific

00:30:43

officers, mid- and even

00:30:45

senior-level commanders who have not committed

00:30:47

a crime, they will have a great

00:30:50

opportunity to continue serving in the

00:30:52

Russian army, it is clear that there are

00:30:54

certain filtration measures

00:30:56

are all clear But this will be exactly so

00:30:59

because today hundreds of thousands of men

00:31:02

are called up by the armed forces of Ukraine, hundreds of

00:31:05

thousands of them will return to their peaceful

00:31:07

activities, but professional military men

00:31:10

Well, someone who has somehow merged with NATO there

00:31:14

has grown together incredibly or has committed a

00:31:15

crime will run away to the west, as usual,

00:31:17

they will be sheltered somewhere in Canada, but I am

00:31:20

sure that tens of thousands of Ukrainian

00:31:21

soldiers will serve in our units, this was the

00:31:25

case during the Civil War, then the

00:31:28

whites and reds served in the same army,

00:31:30

this is not surprising, in

00:31:34

fact, today we see a unit from

00:31:37

In the Chechen Republic, if you rewind

00:31:39

there 25 or 30 years ago, some of them with

00:31:44

our military

00:31:46

colleagues today were on opposite sides of the Barricades,

00:31:49

then there was an amnesty, then there was a Peaceful

00:31:51

Settlement And now they are

00:31:54

fighting well together against the enemies of Russia, it

00:31:57

will be exactly the same here, therefore the thesis my

00:31:59

kind We will also

00:32:01

strengthen it with the military potential that the

00:32:04

West transferred to Ukraine; it will not only be

00:32:07

destroyed, it will also become part of our

00:32:10

military potential and in the military sense,

00:32:13

so to speak, a specific tank, not that

00:32:16

they will all be melted down later, but also

00:32:18

specific combat experience and a specific

00:32:20

soldier who will finally -they’ll tell you how

00:32:23

it all started, where it grew from, and he’s

00:32:27

sure he’ll

00:32:29

have certain feelings and emotions for

00:32:32

those who dragged him specifically, his homeland,

00:32:36

his city, his region, into this terrible

00:32:39

fratricidal one, because

00:32:42

Ukrainian soldiers still have to find out this in

00:32:44

full.

00:32:46

Uh-huh Tell me there is a certain person

00:32:50

whose name is zhali, he wrote a book, a

00:32:53

short history of the future, in short, that

00:32:58

2024, even 2025, will still be the milestone

00:33:03

when the world will change quite a lot,

00:33:06

move from one form to another, is this in

00:33:09

your opinion, Utopia, or are

00:33:12

events really developing in such a way that some things are happening?

00:33:15

quite radical changes in the world,

00:33:18

well, first of all, the answer to the question Who is

00:33:22

Jacques Atali Jacques Atali is the Talking

00:33:25

Head of the Globalists

00:33:27

This is not just some weird

00:33:29

guy. No, this is one of those who is

00:33:32

really a thinker and who voices

00:33:36

theses that are important, useful, and necessary for the

00:33:40

owners of world money. he

00:33:42

really voices the transition of the world to

00:33:44

some new quality, but here the most

00:33:47

important question is: what kind? After all, when

00:33:50

Hitler’s ideologists spoke about

00:33:52

the construction of some kind of New World and a

00:33:53

new order, Noni clearly meant the

00:33:56

end of 1946 in Europe when Germany

00:34:00

was divided into parts the Nazi party

00:34:02

is banned, that is, both are

00:34:04

some kind of new order for Europe Well, for the world there is an

00:34:07

order, but it is completely different,

00:34:10

so you need to listen carefully

00:34:12

to what people like Jacques

00:34:14

Atali say, but understand that changes can

00:34:17

be in any

00:34:19

direction. I would like just

00:34:21

one more, one of Jacques’s forecasts,

00:34:24

and to remind you that it is very relevant in

00:34:28

my opinion, he said that around the

00:34:31

period that is, that

00:34:32

is, in the mid-s, the

00:34:36

Western state and the political

00:34:39

system will be greatly

00:34:41

compromised, first of all, we were talking

00:34:43

about the political system of the United

00:34:46

States of America can Perhaps he meant

00:34:49

that of

00:34:50

all the candidates for the post of President of the

00:34:52

United States of America, the one most

00:34:56

unsuitable

00:34:57

in terms of physical age and condition will be chosen.

00:35:01

Perhaps we will see this in the near future.

00:35:04

But there is no need to treat forecasts and

00:35:07

books of such talking heads of

00:35:08

globalists as inevitability, remember

00:35:12

one more the speaking head of the globalists,

00:35:16

Gade's employee Francis Fukuyama, told us about the end of

00:35:19

history that in his sense he even

00:35:23

wrote a book meant the Victory of liberalism in the

00:35:26

whole world, I

00:35:27

think he wrote this book in the early nineties

00:35:30

Well, how many 30 years have passed Well,

00:35:33

what do you want to ask Tari

00:35:37

Fukuyama defeated liberalism throughout the world

00:35:41

No, the Americans themselves say Well, it’s

00:35:43

them, of course, as always, they label

00:35:47

dictatorial regimes all over the world.

00:35:49

Wait, you told us 30 years ago,

00:35:51

democracy, Iran, win

00:35:55

where do you get dictatorial regimes, so

00:35:59

all their forecasts, all their scenarios can

00:36:01

be

00:36:02

rewritten and this is one of the ways

00:36:05

to change the scenario of the globalists. You

00:36:08

just mentioned that something

00:36:10

could go wrong in the United States of America.

00:36:11

Now it’s quite

00:36:14

relevant to talk about whether suddenly the

00:36:16

United States of America will cease

00:36:18

to be a superpower. Let them even in the

00:36:19

long term become an ordinary

00:36:22

state. But maybe to take their place,

00:36:27

for example, China. Does it have enough

00:36:29

strength because we see that Britain by

00:36:31

2025 is clearly preparing all sorts of

00:36:35

Chinese machinations in military terms? Well, you

00:36:39

mean that Great Britain said that by

00:36:40

the year twenty-fifth it will send a

00:36:43

large number to the Pacific Asian region

00:36:46

connection of your navy

00:36:48

Yes, this is exactly what I read on your

00:36:50

Telegram channel yesterday Yes, attention that

00:36:53

apparently the Chinese comrades Strictly on

00:36:55

schedule,

00:36:57

in the opinion of the Anglo-Saxons, should create

00:36:59

problems for them That is, not earlier than two years ago,

00:37:01

here is the

00:37:03

Armed Forces, which of course is nonsense, but

00:37:07

look when we speak that the United States

00:37:09

will cease to be a superpower, it

00:37:11

seems to me that some of our

00:37:13

Hotheads understand this in some kind of

00:37:15

grotesque sense. They understand that

00:37:18

Gorbachev came to the United States, who instead is an

00:37:25

American dejection. Yes, and the states take away

00:37:28

their sovereignty, scatter and

00:37:32

some kind of big mess begins there because what do they

00:37:35

define Who has what borders Who

00:37:37

owes what to whom that is, plunges into the abyss of

00:37:40

civil war Well, this will not happen in the

00:37:44

United States of America a long time ago,

00:37:48

this problem of a state secession from the

00:37:51

United States of America has already

00:37:54

been solved, I will remind you that this

00:37:56

says a lot Dear Anatoly

00:37:58

Vaserman, the translation is important in Russian, we

00:38:01

say the United States of America. But

00:38:04

in fact, we must say the United

00:38:05

States of America because there Stace

00:38:08

is a state. That is, this

00:38:10

state united in a

00:38:12

sense, just as in the Soviet Union the

00:38:13

Republics, which are

00:38:16

separate states, also united. one of

00:38:19

the amendments prohibits secession from the

00:38:21

United States of America, this is

00:38:24

constitutionally impossible to do. That

00:38:26

is, you can raise a rebellion as the

00:38:29

Confederates once did, who, being

00:38:32

American politicians included in the

00:38:35

American system by American

00:38:36

generals like General Lee Yes, simply

00:38:39

gathered legally elected bodies

00:38:43

in their States and declared that they were separating

00:38:45

from the

00:38:47

North American United

00:38:50

States and making another state, a

00:38:53

confederate state of America, that’s

00:38:56

what happened next, the Civil War began,

00:38:59

but American politicians drew

00:39:02

conclusions from this, so it’s prohibited by law.

00:39:05

But at the moment when the

00:39:07

southerners did this, there was no such ban It’s

00:39:10

just that the Federal Center, as we would

00:39:12

say, responded by sending troops and, strictly

00:39:15

speaking, forcefully suppressing

00:39:17

this from its point of view. For

00:39:26

example,

00:39:27

Europe, which

00:39:30

suddenly, by bringing

00:39:34

some independent politicians to power,

00:39:36

announces the withdrawal of American troops from

00:39:38

the territory. But this is all hanging on within a hair's

00:39:41

breadth, Germany gives

00:39:43

permission for Americans to be on

00:39:45

its territory. They are there with the permission of

00:39:47

Germany, of course, Poland gives it too, and so

00:39:50

on and so forth. Now

00:39:52

imagine that in Germany a miracle

00:39:55

happened, another government came to power

00:39:57

and it says 2 months for

00:40:00

you to leave If you can’t

00:40:03

kill or buy all these politicians,

00:40:05

you’ll have to leave in 2 months because otherwise

00:40:07

it will look like an occupation. And

00:40:10

that’s a completely different story.

00:40:20

superpower status when they

00:40:22

cease to be the one who puts pressure on everyone and everything,

00:40:26

and not that they

00:40:29

have turned into, well, I don’t know, into a banana

00:40:31

Republic and into a civil war zone,

00:40:34

so when you say that China

00:40:37

can replace them, this means that

00:40:38

again they are simply in a race of some kind - then horses

00:40:41

instead of one the other will be in first

00:40:44

place no they will go neck and neck and it’s

00:40:47

not a fact that there will be two of them here we are also the

00:40:50

third horse here the euro may

00:40:55

appear there is no one then much

00:40:57

more than two appear then that’s the point

00:41:01

but for the USA this is the way already well as they say

00:41:05

down, imagine Well, I don’t

00:41:08

know, a football club or a hockey club

00:41:11

that always took first place,

00:41:13

well, for example, the Russian national team, the

00:41:15

Canadian national team Yes, any place except the

00:41:18

first is such a celebration with tears in the

00:41:22

eyes, yes And if the third place Well,

00:41:25

prize money Well, there they will be just cry

00:41:28

in the literal sense of the word Yes, it’s as if they do

00:41:30

n’t need these bronze medals at all, and

00:41:33

so the Americans don’t need it either,

00:41:35

because then processes begin to reduce

00:41:38

opportunities in the economy in the military sphere of

00:41:40

abandoning the dollar and this snowball

00:41:44

begins begins to begins to

00:41:46

grow and the United States begins to weaken

00:41:49

therefore, for them the task is to prevent the

00:41:51

growth of the second and third forces to remain the

00:41:53

only ones; they are not interested in

00:41:56

competition for first place; they are

00:41:58

interested in unconditional, indisputable

00:42:01

first place by a large margin and forever.

00:42:03

This is their political concept. Uh-huh. Well,

00:42:08

naturally, I can’t help but ask you. That’s what

00:42:09

we do after all. interview for the union

00:42:12

meeting, what did the Union of Russia and Belarus manage to achieve this year

00:42:16

and what

00:42:18

else would you like to see from the activities of the

00:42:22

union state in

00:42:25

the future? Well, here you always need

00:42:29

to express yourself correctly in relation to enemies,

00:42:32

simply because we are well-mannered people. Yes,

00:42:34

we should not speak what language -it’s

00:42:37

indecent in relation to friends, you have to be

00:42:39

even more careful just so as not to offend them

00:42:41

or offend them or something else that makes

00:42:45

me happy is that the integration process is

00:42:49

all the time

00:42:50

Wuxi was wobbling

00:42:55

about

00:42:56

that periodically arose before then

00:42:59

some kind of dairy problems or

00:43:01

Belarusian shrimps No welcomed

00:43:03

to the Russian market Well, that is, there was something all the time,

00:43:05

but now I don’t hear it, probably there are

00:43:08

some rough edges, like

00:43:10

in any complex process. But there

00:43:13

are clearly fewer of them. Further, Russian nuclear weapons

00:43:17

were stationed this year on the

00:43:19

territory of Belarus. But this is serious. this is an

00:43:22

indicator of a serious step in the level of

00:43:24

integration, yes,

00:43:26

this is really good and

00:43:28

correct, I would like

00:43:31

for our integration to move even

00:43:35

further, so that we have a single currency,

00:43:39

so that we have a single financial center,

00:43:41

well, here we have, of course, big questions for the

00:43:43

Central Bank of Russia, but we hope

00:43:45

that sooner or later they will still be

00:43:48

resolved, that is, this is where

00:43:51

our integration will be even greater. And of course, the

00:43:55

Union State of Russia Belarus is an

00:43:58

excellent tool where I

00:44:02

will allow myself to

00:44:04

speculate a little, it would be possible to

00:44:06

add what remains under the

00:44:10

name

00:44:12

Ukraine Well, why not,

00:44:15

actually, and maybe not, because once

00:44:20

again the final political

00:44:23

settlement is somehow not indicated. Well, I

00:44:26

can also

00:44:29

throw out a few more theses in your first question.

00:44:31

What is demilitarization when

00:44:34

Germany after the First World War

00:44:37

does not have the right to have an army, it has the right

00:44:40

to have Well, it’s almost like a people’s militia,

00:44:42

yes they have machine guns, rifles, tanks, no

00:44:45

artillery, no navy, no

00:44:48

aviation is prohibited, there are only

00:44:51

ground units and the number is described. Well,

00:44:54

according to the Treaty of Versailles there were 100,000

00:44:57

and Ukraine does not have the right to have armed

00:45:01

forces, after the end there is a police force,

00:45:04

maybe there is no army at all. Ukraine

00:45:07

declares that it does

00:45:09

not need an army anymore because Russia

00:45:14

guarantees, which

00:45:16

means certain aspects of Ukrainian

00:45:19

[music]

00:45:24

statehood.

00:45:26

Well, actually, the Presidential Decree is

00:45:29

valid obtain Russian

00:45:32

citizenship please serve in the

00:45:34

Russian army with Russian

00:45:36

citizenship, in order to

00:45:38

guarantee the implementation by the new

00:45:40

political regime of the political power of

00:45:43

Ukraine of this agreement,

00:45:45

Russian military bases must be placed on the territory of Ukraine,

00:45:48

how many, where and how, we don’t

00:45:52

know But this is mandatory Let’s

00:45:55

see United States to

00:45:57

guarantee the loyalty of Japan to Germany to

00:46:00

Italy and so on They stationed troops there

00:46:02

in 1945, well, here

00:46:05

we understand a certain analogy Yes, there was a military operation,

00:46:07

after all,

00:46:08

and they are in no hurry to leave, they do not pay

00:46:12

attention to the fact that there are already 25 generations of

00:46:15

politicians who call themselves

00:46:16

democrats and they swear their love to the

00:46:18

United States of America for some reason they are not leaving

00:46:22

American because they are in ri

00:46:28

loyalty and to a certain extent

00:46:30

controllability But here are certain

00:46:32

points we already Yes then there is

00:46:34

denazification what is it people

00:46:37

who were in Nazi parties

00:46:39

who will be recognized by the court as Nazis

00:46:41

They have no right serve in the security

00:46:43

forces do not have the right to work there in the

00:46:46

education system If they have committed

00:46:49

a crime they are judged by the

00:46:52

irat of

00:46:54

all

00:46:57

filtration this also happened after the Second

00:46:59

World War in relation to the Germans, therefore

00:47:01

here

00:47:03

Well, there is nothing new in this sense either,

00:47:06

well, here are some theses already it’s

00:47:09

as if you and I have been drawn, and if in

00:47:14

this situation the Ukrainian state

00:47:17

is ready to join the union

00:47:19

state and the union state

00:47:21

is ready for integration, then here,

00:47:26

strictly speaking, the zone of possible

00:47:28

political decisions begins. It seems to me that in the

00:47:31

future Ukrainian state in which

00:47:33

every citizen of this state can

00:47:35

receive Russian passport the

00:47:37

integration process will somehow go very quickly And

00:47:40

after a while there will be a

00:47:42

minimum number of those who will

00:47:44

only have a Ukrainian passport there will be a

00:47:46

maximum number of those who will have

00:47:48

two here I hear concerns that are often

00:47:51

expressed But how can it be that they

00:47:53

will vote anyway Then there are

00:47:56

a lot of forms that we can borrow from

00:47:57

our Anglo-Saxon comrades,

00:48:00

for example, Puerto Rica

00:48:02

is a territory of the

00:48:04

United States, people have American passports,

00:48:07

currency units are the dollar, but Puerto Ricans

00:48:10

do not vote in the presidential elections of the

00:48:12

United States of America and no one

00:48:14

says that this is just horror, horror,

00:48:17

that’s why here certain restrictions can also be introduced. It’s

00:48:20

clear,

00:48:22

for obvious reasons, for example, all

00:48:24

citizens

00:48:26

who received Russian citizenship from

00:48:27

such and such a date for 10 years do not

00:48:30

participate in the presidential elections

00:48:33

in Russia,

00:48:35

well, here we don’t have to be afraid

00:48:38

to protect our state from

00:48:40

certain moments that we consider,

00:48:43

so to speak dangerous, but this is just a

00:48:46

proposal, maybe there is no need to introduce

00:48:48

such restrictions, we will see that,

00:48:50

in fact, the information

00:48:52

field has immediately changed the obs for people,

00:48:56

such fears are already

00:48:58

unnecessary Question As they say in the

00:49:01

afterword, in the outgoing year 2023

00:49:05

was the anniversary of the death of Joseph

00:49:09

Stalin, 70 years since he died you in one of

00:49:13

their interviews just on Komsomolskaya

00:49:15

Pravda they said that if this man

00:49:18

had been alive, the world would be

00:49:24

different now

00:49:26

if Stalin had remained alive then, that’s the

00:49:37

saddest thing in all the

00:49:40

historical forecasts that are given

00:49:42

Back in time in that what should always be

00:49:45

said if if if if in

00:49:49

any

00:49:50

case or later

00:49:54

from let me remind you that in the forty-ninth year

00:49:57

his

00:49:58

seventieth birthday was solemnly celebrated and in the fifty-third

00:50:00

year there is every reason to believe that

00:50:02

Stalin was poisoned but what can we

00:50:05

say would have changed here even

00:50:09

more likely it is not important the role of Stalin himself as a

00:50:12

person

00:50:14

as a certain course and view of what

00:50:17

needs to be done And what cannot be done, that is, there have

00:50:20

been changes in the political

00:50:22

economic semantic course of Stalin,

00:50:25

well, let’s

00:50:26

take the simplest Stalin’s

00:50:29

famous annual price reduction, I

00:50:33

’ll remind you that in 1947 That is,

00:50:36

practically there

00:50:37

through this how once it was in December of the forty-

00:50:40

seventh year. That is, 2 years

00:50:42

after the war, a monetary reform took place in the Soviet Union.

00:50:44

Well, we won’t

00:50:48

talk about the details now. Look, the reform was

00:50:51

very interesting and correct; it was

00:50:53

carried out at the same time as the

00:50:56

monetary reform; cards were abolished, that

00:50:59

is once again, 2 years after the

00:51:01

end of the war in the Soviet Union,

00:51:02

they canceled all cards. Go buy

00:51:04

as much as you want, whatever you want. Well, it’s clear

00:51:08

if you have money, and even since the forty-

00:51:12

eighth year. From the next year, an

00:51:15

annual decrease in prices began; it happened

00:51:18

either on March 1 or April 1 or On March 15,

00:51:22

that is, in December forty-seven,

00:51:24

a reform took place and on March 1, forty-eighth there

00:51:27

was already a reduction in prices for the working people of the Soviet

00:51:30

Union, they showed Yes, the reform

00:51:32

took something from someone there But it

00:51:35

had to be done, but listen, the economy

00:51:38

is developing and everyone lives better every year This is

00:51:42

it it’s clear Yes, if your salary is

00:51:45

unchanged And not all goods But many

00:51:49

are becoming cheaper, which means you live better

00:51:51

because there are no more restrictions on purchasing You

00:51:53

can buy what you want and you know

00:51:55

that next year you will live even

00:51:58

better Well, what if you are a leader in

00:52:01

production, an innovator or something else?

00:52:04

some famous combine operator So

00:52:06

your salary will increase So you

00:52:08

will, that is, you understand the mood

00:52:10

of a person, you won a terrible war,

00:52:13

restored everything and then Everything is better better

00:52:16

better And what’s in the West And what’s in the West We

00:52:19

understand perfectly well because we

00:52:20

live in this world today In the Western economy, the rise in prices is

00:52:24

constant, it can be smaller, it can be

00:52:26

larger, it can be non-existent. Yes, the

00:52:30

word is inflation, but it is constant and

00:52:32

inevitable, and here all the time a

00:52:35

competition begins between the growth of wages of a

00:52:37

particular person and in society as a whole

00:52:40

and the

00:52:41

price level, someone may live annually

00:52:44

better than him salaries, his income grows,

00:52:46

prices also grow, but less But this is,

00:52:50

unfortunately, such a rare story, and in the

00:52:53

forty-eighth forty-ninth PM PM and VM,

00:52:58

prices were reduced, and

00:53:01

the question arises: If the Soviet Union could reduce prices for 5 years in a row.

00:53:04

It was somehow

00:53:06

economically justified Well, it’s probably

00:53:09

true that it wasn’t just that Fir sat and

00:53:12

wrote Let’s say that Doctor’s sausage

00:53:14

has fallen in price The city loaf has fallen in price I do

00:53:17

n’t know about Khvanchkara’s wine I love

00:53:20

Let’s have it too, well, that’s not the same way it was

00:53:21

done

00:53:22

Yes, there would be some kind of procedure there would be a

00:53:25

ministry, department, and so on.

00:53:29

next is the most interesting n year Stalin

00:53:31

dies in March on April 1, the planned price reduction still

00:53:36

happens, a pre-

00:53:38

planned reduction in prices simply

00:53:41

because they decided not to cancel it, otherwise it would have been

00:53:44

very noticeable that Stalin

00:53:46

was buried and after 2 weeks there is no reduction

00:53:51

there is

00:53:54

hell

00:53:56

and here is the question that we are now dealing with

00:53:59

discussed with you This is a constant

00:54:01

decline in the goal, it was caused by

00:54:04

the capabilities of the Soviet economy. If

00:54:06

so, where did the capabilities of the Soviet

00:54:09

economy go after Stalin died, they were

00:54:12

gone, if there was no possibility of the

00:54:16

Soviet economy, then why did all this

00:54:19

happen and no economic

00:54:21

cataclysms occurred at the same time

00:54:24

? after all, it turns out six

00:54:26

more expensive

00:54:27

there was no answer to this question, so

00:54:30

the world would be different, there would be further

00:54:33

reductions in cost, rationalization

00:54:35

proposals would be in the Soviet Union, the people

00:54:38

would get used to it even more, well, there was p-6,

00:54:41

but can you imagine there were

00:54:43

26 and there may already be a new leader

00:54:47

of the Soviet Union, even if he were

00:54:48

completely opposed to this, he

00:54:50

simply would not have risked canceling

00:54:53

all this this time because it was impossible to explain to people

00:54:55

that is, Stalin was everything, he

00:54:57

came You didn’t do anything, this is

00:54:59

how further friendship with China Soviet

00:55:03

Union plus China Russia plus China

00:55:05

today, but we see how powerful it is, how

00:55:07

important it is. Only then we were number

00:55:11

one in the economy in the sense that the

00:55:14

country was headed by a man who was

00:55:17

immensely respected throughout the world and who

00:55:20

helped China gain independence.

00:55:22

Add to this the vast territory of

00:55:24

China, a very large country. Well, I sing with us

00:55:27

it is of course smaller

00:55:28

and human resources at the time of the

00:55:31

Mau Victory in 1940 there were 500 million people living in China,

00:55:35

that is, the Soviet Union there was 200 million

00:55:39

Yes there are 180 plus China is a huge

00:55:42

huge force the world would have been different

00:55:47

but something happened

00:55:51

that m

00:55:56

from me Once again I remind our viewers that

00:55:58

today I had a favorite historian in my studio, a

00:56:02

writer whose books help

00:56:05

to understand not only past

00:56:08

events, but also those that are happening

00:56:10

now and even will happen in the future,

00:56:13

thank you so much Goodbye Nikolai

00:56:15

Viktorovich I will allow one last phrase

00:56:18

since you said that the answers are

00:56:21

honest,

00:56:23

as an honest person, I must say

00:56:26

that I’m still not a

00:56:28

historian, I understand after all, I’m not a historian, although in

00:56:32

my books we also talk about

00:56:34

history, politics and economics. Well,

00:56:36

now we have complete honesty,

00:56:38

thank you, thank you Thank you very much

00:56:41

Goodbye Goodbye

Description:

✔ Подпишись на канал "СОЮЗНОЕ ВЕЧЕ": https://goo.su/J55rLh Смотрите интервью с историком и публицистом Николаем Стариковым на радио "Комсомольская правда" . Тема программы - итоги -2023 года: СВО - провал Запада и успех России; борьба между республиканцами и демократами в США; мы имеем дело с самым серьезным соперником за всю историю человечества; может ли запад заморозить украинский конфликт; обложки журнала Time - от Гитлера до Зеленского. ➤ Наш сайт: https://www.souzveche.ru/ ➤ ВК: https://vk.com/souzveche ➤ ОК: https://ok.ru/souzveche ➤ ТГ: https://t.me/souzveche/13887 ➤ ДЗЕН: https://dzen.ru/souzveche.ru ➤ YouTube канал ДАВЫДЬКО / ПАНКИН: https://goo.su/mXzPr2

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Николай Стариков - итоги 2023 года. Успехи России в СВО. Time: от Гитлера до Зеленского | Интервью"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.