Download "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0"

Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.

Previous video: Сергей Переслегин. Геология vs биотехнологии Next video: Посадка НЛО в Южном парке Воронежа - предупреждение человечества - Глобальная волна

Посадка НЛО в Южном парке Воронежа - предупреждение человечества - Глобальная волна

Посадка НЛО в Южном парке Воронежа - предупреждение человечества - Глобальная волна

Channel: Глобальная Волна — Global Wave

Сергей Переслегин. Геология vs биотехнологии

Сергей Переслегин. Геология vs биотехнологии

Channel: СОЦИОСОФТ.ТВ

🌑 СЕКРЕТ МАГНИТНОГО ХРАНИТЕЛЯ РАСКРЫТ - ПОЛЬЗУЙТЕСЬ! Невероятно просто! Игорь Белецкий

🌑 СЕКРЕТ МАГНИТНОГО ХРАНИТЕЛЯ РАСКРЫТ - ПОЛЬЗУЙТЕСЬ! Невероятно просто! Игорь Белецкий

Channel: Igor Beletskiy

ЭФИР- Один пояс один путь-Олег Басаргин - Федеральный собор - Глобальная волна

ЭФИР- Один пояс один путь-Олег Басаргин - Федеральный собор - Глобальная волна

Channel: Глобальная Волна — Global Wave

ДОКЛАД РИМСКОМУ КЛУБУ. Сергей Переслегин

ДОКЛАД РИМСКОМУ КЛУБУ. Сергей Переслегин

Channel: СОЦИОСОФТ.ТВ

ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНЫЙ СУВЕРЕНИТЕТ. НОВАЯ КОГНИТИВНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА. СЕРГЕЙ ПЕРЕСЛЕГИН

ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНЫЙ СУВЕРЕНИТЕТ. НОВАЯ КОГНИТИВНАЯ ПАРАДИГМА. СЕРГЕЙ ПЕРЕСЛЕГИН

Channel: СОЦИОСОФТ.ТВ

Секрет квадрата Пифагора - Мракобесие Сергея Снисаренко - Глобальная волна

Секрет квадрата Пифагора - Мракобесие Сергея Снисаренко - Глобальная волна

Channel: Глобальная Волна — Global Wave

КВАНТОВАЯ МЕХАНИКА: 100 лет открытий за 1 час / физик Семихатов

КВАНТОВАЯ МЕХАНИКА: 100 лет открытий за 1 час / физик Семихатов

Channel: Револьт-центр | Pimenov center

Фотон

Фотон

Channel: Science Lite

Кризис современной физики | Пушка #60

Кризис современной физики | Пушка #60

Channel: SciOne

Сергей Переслегин

онтологический верстак

онтология

Котлы

мышление

парадокс

квантовая механика

лаборатория

нити мышления

физика

метафизика

00:00:03

The fact is that I was doing farms all night, in

00:00:07

fact, I’m still completely

00:00:11

The fact is that We are distinguished by a rather

00:00:14

interesting feature as a group,

00:00:17

namely, remember, probably everyone remembers

00:00:20

distant joy

00:00:22

goes forward, the wave remains with him In the rear,

00:00:25

he needs to maintain the speed of

00:00:27

movement, so he spits on the fact that

00:00:30

in the rear on his front the offensive is

00:00:31

narrowing all the time,

00:00:33

that as you remember, along the same distant path, it

00:00:35

ended with a normally good flank,

00:00:38

as it should

00:00:39

be called, the books need to read the strategies,

00:00:42

they are not mistaken, friend,

00:00:50

we are actually not narrowing the front of our

00:00:54

speech. On the contrary, we are constantly

00:00:55

expanding a little bit,

00:01:04

we constantly create questions,

00:01:07

some of which we answer over time,

00:01:10

and some of the questions are

00:01:14

terribly interesting and remain hanging somehow,

00:01:16

we don’t throw them away But we don’t do them And as a

00:01:20

rule, there are 12 such old questions,

00:01:24

but which of the many will be it’s

00:01:27

impossible to predict B principle

00:01:31

Which one will be attacked for some reason

00:01:33

It must happen often

00:01:35

and I will indicate some of the questions of the last

00:01:38

year and add questions from previous

00:01:40

years that also remained

00:01:42

this is my first statement my second

00:01:45

statement regarding the problem and the

00:01:49

crisis of boilers the crisis of cats was

00:01:51

predicted at the turn of the 18th-19th Century I

00:01:55

definitely won’t remember the famous

00:01:58

fabulists Ivan Andreevich Krylov

00:02:01

in the swan database

00:02:03

in our case everything is as usual a tiger

00:02:07

rushes in the clouds someone is reaching back Well,

00:02:11

thoughts with a viophone, as it should be, won’t be with whales,

00:02:13

but in the end you get a

00:02:16

complex task of moving the input

00:02:19

which again, considering that there are

00:02:22

three vectors, they are directed in different spaces.

00:02:24

Yes, I’m still not sure what’s in the three worlds,

00:02:27

so where it goes again doesn’t quite

00:02:31

mean what I now want to show is

00:02:34

part of the assembly of the laboratory space of

00:02:36

last year, and not in general, but only

00:02:39

from the point of view of my laboratory I generally

00:02:43

assumed that each of the admirers

00:02:44

would make a similar type of assembly. But

00:02:47

as far as I understand, the assembly that

00:02:50

I made more or less includes not only

00:02:52

spaces, not in the sense of not only the theory of

00:02:56

forecasting, partly astrophysics, but

00:02:59

space is not assembled in principle; or

00:03:02

rather, it is not assembled in any other way in

00:03:05

that something is getting dark, they call the next

00:03:07

layer.

00:03:10

So, what was possible to do according to

00:03:13

the methodology, the

00:03:18

very basic idea, it

00:03:21

will definitely be restored to the catalogue, this single

00:03:24

space of thinking with the general framework

00:03:25

of this thinking, while we have it in the

00:03:29

previous picture, probably two frames,

00:03:36

this is of course the frame of humanity and language

00:03:41

very much it is important for me that language and

00:03:44

humanity Despite all the long

00:03:46

conversations,

00:03:48

comrades, about this without language,

00:03:50

But the fact that language from humanity turned out to be

00:03:52

nearby is extremely important for me to know,

00:03:57

respectively, and the second frame was

00:04:00

associated with constructions like nothing, the

00:04:03

eternal world, not the eternal world nor the eternal world and

00:04:07

everything connected with the concept of absence,

00:04:11

from my point of view, I’m not even very

00:04:14

located on the map because of course

00:04:17

what was said about chaos, the

00:04:19

Dionysian principle. It should have

00:04:22

gone in this direction, they are closer to

00:04:23

humanity.

00:04:24

But this will

00:04:27

mean further and in any situation in our

00:04:32

laboratory, everything subsequent

00:04:33

configured the previous one,

00:04:37

naturally it was not possible to fully maintain this principle,

00:04:39

but within the limits of some

00:04:41

possibilities, we tried to do it

00:04:43

here, we will try to do the

00:04:46

same thing, that is, it will be the evening

00:04:48

general meeting and the morning general

00:04:50

meeting, respectively. How is it we

00:04:53

will try to move in the previous

00:04:54

field

00:04:55

preserved There

00:05:00

is a large billiard room here,

00:05:03

if only we could put a big big white sheet on this large billiard table,

00:05:08

then Violetta is very busy right now,

00:05:13

she drew herself very well Yes, because we believe

00:05:15

that for joint work Here is a

00:05:18

map of the service station on which everyone draws it

00:05:20

can be useful another question What Allah

00:05:24

knows what an assembly is a situation where

00:05:27

everyone draws in their

00:05:29

own ideas about what

00:05:32

they want to draw In what language But

00:05:35

twice we were able to do it in the

00:05:37

laboratory twice it turned out to be a

00:05:40

tactical flipchart it’s clear That’s how it

00:05:43

was and now there is, uh, as for

00:05:46

working with the screen, it’s easy to notice

00:05:50

Three different ideas about the screen, one of

00:05:53

which I will show further during this

00:05:55

presentation, but I communicated, to say

00:05:57

completely honestly and frankly, I

00:05:59

couldn’t cope with the screen, we weren’t

00:06:02

able to make such an idea, the

00:06:04

work of the laboratory with which it would be possible

00:06:07

to work

00:06:08

But we got a good idea in

00:06:11

short assemblies that are 5-6 of their own and

00:06:13

include basic exercises. An

00:06:16

interesting point was invented by

00:06:19

situational centers, they came up with it in

00:06:22

Yekaterinburg Natasha and I don’t remember

00:06:25

why And why it will be needed

00:06:27

then we tested it twice once

00:06:29

extremely successfully,

00:06:38

according to astrophysics, we

00:06:40

used this thing quite interestingly. I

00:06:43

assume that the theory of k will work

00:06:45

here on boilers in this language in the language of the

00:06:48

remote room, the next layer is the

00:06:53

basic results that I think

00:06:56

we will have to keep in mind. This is where I am

00:06:58

normally

00:07:01

No,

00:07:03

this is apparently

00:07:05

for the audience And after

00:07:09

Vladimir Afrikovich’s excellent lecture in September, at

00:07:12

which we came across the basis of subtracting all the

00:07:14

laboratories,

00:07:19

we came up with such a thing, that is, we began to

00:07:21

work to understand him,

00:07:24

great speculation can immediately

00:07:26

be schematized as a connection between theoretical

00:07:29

ontological areas, that is, on the one

00:07:32

hand,

00:07:33

this is the basis of the theory and ontological into the

00:07:37

non-ontological method ontologically according to

00:07:40

on the way here, fair things said that

00:07:43

in essence the threads of thinking with a needle and

00:07:45

questioning flow easily anthologies Well, that

00:07:48

is, for example,

00:07:50

the anthology

00:07:52

that the ancient Greeks used

00:07:55

is difficult to name philosophical oncology, let's

00:07:57

say conditionally

00:07:58

scholastic Christian ontology

00:08:00

scientific ontology

00:08:02

modern post-scientific very

00:08:04

different but at the same time certain thoughts of

00:08:07

construction even many thoughts of

00:08:09

construction starting from the same Greek

00:08:11

paradox I feel great with all these

00:08:14

ontologies and it seems that it’s not very

00:08:17

remarkable where it was replaced by another Yes, it’s not

00:08:20

very interesting,

00:08:22

but on the other hand, the understanding that every

00:08:25

theory that we create Yes, it’s clear that

00:08:28

I’m using Stevenson’s approach in anathema

00:08:31

therefore not a theory of a theory This is a slightly

00:08:33

different concept they are connected But not But not

00:08:36

equally can be connected with different

00:08:39

ontologies In some places the situation arises

00:08:42

absolutely anecdotally because this is the

00:08:47

difference of ontology within one theory

00:08:51

reflected by peoples extreme

00:08:54

as a trivial example of

00:08:58

Sergei Shilov the situation with quantum

00:09:00

mechanics where we mix

00:09:04

platonism

00:09:06

German classical philosophy

00:09:10

Anglo-Saxon law school and

00:09:14

Russian-Soviet mathematics,

00:09:17

respectively, there should be four five

00:09:20

maybe six quantum mechanics But

00:09:22

since the formula can be written the same way,

00:09:25

people prefer not to consider this question and

00:09:28

literally at the level

00:09:31

Let’s not talk about it, but everyone

00:09:34

understands what’s wrong with you in one formula,

00:09:36

mix two different ontologies, then it does

00:09:39

n’t add up at all to a

00:09:40

kilogram with a centimeter, for which you will be

00:09:44

given a bad mark in any school right away, they don’t

00:09:46

discuss further the conversation, we

00:09:50

quite calmly add such different ontological dimensions

00:09:53

together and the main thing is that everything is absolutely in

00:09:56

order

00:09:57

and a very interesting question We must

00:10:00

understand that any ontological

00:10:03

basis not only necessarily

00:10:05

has an embodiment in theoretical

00:10:07

space, but also always comes

00:10:10

practically,

00:10:11

so when some of them

00:10:13

show their fingers in this, the inventors of the Western

00:10:16

maximum

00:10:18

begin to speak out about the fact that the

00:10:20

Soviet Army occupied them and

00:10:23

arranged it,

00:10:25

I want to ask you about the connection of

00:10:27

oncology with the theory of practice for

00:10:30

the first time about this

00:10:32

Of course, any theoretical model,

00:10:35

any ontological model comes out in

00:10:38

practice,

00:10:39

another question is that ontologists prefer

00:10:41

not to see this practice, like we didn’t

00:10:43

say anything like that, but practitioners also

00:10:45

prefer not to pay attention to the fact

00:10:48

that the ontological model not only

00:10:50

puts this practice, but also always

00:10:53

shows its boundaries, where it

00:10:54

ends and where it is necessary to abandon this matter the

00:10:57

next layer the

00:11:00

second result which

00:11:02

seems to me the most interesting the most

00:11:04

important of what was done

00:11:06

last year It’s like It’s not paradoxical that we

00:11:10

really sorted out one of the

00:11:12

- questions posed the

00:11:15

year before last when it was said that

00:11:18

And that in nature there is so much relief,

00:11:21

a lot of relief Why do we need 100-odd chemical

00:11:24

elements, 40 would be enough for us to

00:11:27

properly make the universe Why do we

00:11:29

need so many elementary particles, six

00:11:31

costs God knows how much

00:11:34

and was formulated the principle of redundancy

00:11:37

in two forms in integral and

00:11:41

differential and the integral form

00:11:44

interestingly ontologically indicates that

00:11:46

it is the redundancy of the Universe that is the

00:11:49

property that

00:11:51

ensures stability and of course

00:11:54

here it is connected with the Greek paradox,

00:11:56

remember the next step is new in relation

00:11:59

to all previous steps And this means

00:12:02

that they must be arranged so that no matter what is

00:12:05

new, they don’t add anything new, and everything that you

00:12:08

have to withstand it doesn’t

00:12:09

fall apart,

00:12:11

so we get an extremely

00:12:13

complex model, there is such a point of view

00:12:15

so that we can see the universe in its entire

00:12:17

history, including everything. Any

00:12:20

further steps of development, we would see

00:12:23

that there is nothing superfluous at all, but we

00:12:25

Naturally, we can’t see this; the

00:12:29

differential form, from my point of

00:12:31

view, is

00:12:32

much more curious

00:12:35

to fix any speculation about reality

00:12:38

or find elements that are in the given; let’s note

00:12:46

about this again.

00:12:48

We had a very interesting conversation on the way

00:12:50

here. But how did the

00:12:54

French Menorite relate?

00:12:55

They loved like everyone else Menorites a miserable

00:12:59

life and thus minimalism is the minimum

00:13:02

necessary in everything coming thinking.

00:13:05

For example, the Dominicans, for example, don’t imagine anything like that in

00:13:08

themselves, they preferred a

00:13:10

rich life and naturally whining,

00:13:13

anything is too much, but I draw

00:13:16

attention to the fact that the design in which

00:13:18

any speculation of reality necessarily

00:13:22

finds elements unnecessary in this world in

00:13:25

this view, in itself, there is a rather

00:13:28

serious philosophical principle, or even a

00:13:30

philosophical one, I imagine

00:13:32

we won’t have to work further on the next

00:13:34

layer,

00:13:37

and from here

00:13:39

several quite beautiful ones arise at once,

00:13:44

look at the

00:13:47

first principle, we just

00:13:50

discussed it at the previous ones, of which, in

00:13:52

principle, it was a principle in itself

00:13:55

we formulated a year ago,

00:13:58

any theory, any finite set

00:14:01

contains an error, that is, a certain judgment

00:14:05

whose truth in the theory and in the

00:14:07

observed world does not coincide;

00:14:09

moreover, it is possible in this situation, you

00:14:14

cannot create a theory that does not contain

00:14:16

an error if it is at all connected in any way,

00:14:20

worse than that, I’m afraid that this will also apply to

00:14:23

mathematical theories with the world directly

00:14:28

in another form,

00:14:30

but any legal nature of society and

00:14:33

any disk always contains a certain model,

00:14:36

that is, a law is a law plus something that is

00:14:40

not there in the law,

00:14:42

respectively, evolution is evolution with

00:14:45

its laws, theories And something of

00:14:48

evolution and so on in relation to Anything

00:14:51

can be not counting the

00:14:54

Pythagorean formula And maybe it includes including

00:14:57

Sergei Borisovich Or you can ask a question right

00:14:59

here and Do I understand correctly that

00:15:02

from the principle of theoretical

00:15:04

error the principle of e- uh,

00:15:08

as if clarifying these laws, that

00:15:11

is, uh, our first step is evolution.

00:15:13

Just then the evolution of this evolution plus

00:15:16

something else. But this something else is

00:15:18

included in the synthetic theory of

00:15:20

evolution. Then we begin. Well, relatively

00:15:22

speaking, we’ll talk about the genome later

00:15:24

we start talking about these genomes There and

00:15:26

so on And that is, yes

00:15:30

Well, you are completing the construction

00:15:34

and I’m not sure that it is always necessary to complete the construction like

00:15:35

this

00:15:37

as an example This is exactly the

00:15:39

next phrase This example

00:15:40

expresses the Universe is described by

00:15:44

the classical and according to the principle of

00:15:47

redundancy

00:15:49

plus something else this is something that has not yet

00:15:53

been defined; a

00:15:58

fundamental connection that any

00:16:01

logic or any law is open

00:16:06

to its revision;

00:16:10

no law can be finite; this is the

00:16:13

case; and not one form of conceivability can be

00:16:17

reduced to a law;

00:16:21

I don’t comment in any way; I agree;

00:16:36

in the sense of principles here, of course there is but

00:16:41

the principle of the dish or they say

00:16:43

certainty. I’m talking now about

00:16:47

fallacy. I believe that these are different

00:16:48

principles. Although there is a connection between them, there is

00:16:52

someone who went, then last year this

00:16:55

connection is fixed uniformity

00:17:09

and therefore all the problems are most likely Yes,

00:17:14

we have a parameter we call the permanent

00:17:18

dad himself, of course, is constantly a fine

00:17:19

structure since it is necessary to mark it out without

00:17:21

marking it. But in this case, I’m not for

00:17:24

this purpose. The subtleties are not very important right now and

00:17:26

they are small,

00:17:28

this is the most constant fine structure in

00:17:31

this regard, our Universe is almost

00:17:32

classical,

00:17:35

but in principle no one is stopping us from

00:17:36

imagining the universe is much more

00:17:39

towards you

00:17:40

and it is very similar to the fact that every time

00:17:44

we see this very Delta

00:17:46

we must look for

00:17:49

this very parameter of smallness. Why

00:17:52

can we even highlight here the main thing to

00:17:54

take into account and really see uniform

00:17:57

convergence in this case there will not be this

00:18:00

bottleneck through which we we cut through

00:18:01

other worlds, it turns out,

00:18:04

well, I’ll answer, in my language, definitely yes.

00:18:08

Because if any discourse and at least

00:18:10

other language worlds, completely

00:18:12

unexpectedly, an

00:18:14

absolutely practical principle was pulled out of this case; moreover,

00:18:17

since then we have repeatedly used it at

00:18:19

different seminars and it has always worked, we

00:18:21

used strategizing namely the

00:18:24

complexity of the brainpower

00:18:26

underlying the activity should exceed

00:18:28

by one level the complexity of this activity,

00:18:30

just in case, I won’t restore the theory of complexity.

00:18:32

Everyone can

00:18:34

watch this the year before, they discussed

00:18:37

the topic and there it seemed to be brought to the end.

00:18:41

Therefore, if you change

00:18:44

the complexity And thereby change the level of

00:18:47

thoughts, hence the wild problems

00:18:49

of modern In society, the basic problem

00:18:52

is that, as a rule,

00:18:55

decision-makers cannot, not in the

00:18:59

sense of intellectual

00:19:01

ability, they, based on time and

00:19:04

situation,

00:19:05

acquire or use speculation

00:19:08

at least corresponding to the complexity of the process

00:19:12

directly they manage

00:19:16

in relation to activities in the

00:19:19

modern world, your Delta has increased sharply

00:19:23

it has already ceased to essentially be an

00:19:27

African activity, I would say so, maybe that’s why it

00:19:30

has increased this way, because the

00:19:33

activity within the framework of the fact that this

00:19:36

principle is not fulfilled has ceased to be

00:19:39

managed; they are managed activity is

00:19:42

not here, but there is something else, again,

00:19:45

without criticism, but also without agreement with this

00:19:47

is excellent. The wider the window, the easier it is to establish,

00:20:05

and so on,

00:20:16

but still not very

00:20:20

important conclusions, important things that were

00:20:22

made in other seminars, but also related

00:20:25

to the principle of redundancy,

00:20:28

accordingly, I wrote the Russian Federation, of course,

00:20:31

fiber in the USSR was Christianity

00:20:34

unconsciously, we are just for the

00:20:37

laboratory topics the road to the north they discussed

00:20:40

this issue as extremely important the

00:20:42

difference between Soviet zeratheism and

00:20:45

modern European atheism the

00:20:47

difference It’s just that in mirrorism God does not have

00:20:50

but his function must be fulfilled,

00:20:52

but God does not exist and his functions do not exist either.

00:20:56

Therefore, you turn out to be simple and without

00:20:59

energy,

00:21:01

grain theism turns out to be complex and very

00:21:03

energetic By the way, it displaces

00:21:06

paganism no worse than extreme

00:21:09

Catholicism. Those who remember what they did with

00:21:11

pagans in the Soviet Union

00:21:14

will understand that the punishment addressed to us

00:21:18

Orthodox, we had much

00:21:22

softer

00:21:24

fans of no one else,

00:21:27

respectively

00:21:28

[music]

00:21:30

identities based on atheism are simple, but in

00:21:34

Russia today they create the wildest

00:21:36

unpleasant government entertainment of atheism

00:21:38

and zerateism

00:21:40

Well, just in case

00:21:43

Because now our beloved

00:21:47

government is organizing the Orthodox

00:21:49

State and Orthodox society and

00:21:53

for pagans this is of course the right

00:21:55

path to complexity But for graintheists these are

00:21:58

simplifications and simplification is unacceptable according to the

00:22:02

previous principle since the scale of

00:22:04

management is in general it is required

00:22:06

to increase the

00:22:08

essential problems

00:22:21

really

00:22:26

God of

00:22:28

humanity cannot think

00:22:40

very much I like the invented rules

00:22:43

of entertainment the principles of excess

00:22:46

complexity describes creation what we

00:22:50

call the natural world and the principle of

00:22:52

economy we what does not describe our

00:22:54

artificial created by us we will notice

00:22:57

This is not saying that our artificial

00:23:00

they are other

00:23:02

principles of economy of thinking this is Beauty,

00:23:05

this is grace, definitely, but as

00:23:08

our own research shows,

00:23:11

it is humanity, not our groups. Well,

00:23:14

if this is how we can return in the language of

00:23:15

Christianity, well, the Lord does not save money in

00:23:19

it; moreover, we somehow have a very funny

00:23:23

situation among the Protestants, one of the

00:23:26

brothers found himself without money dreamed of

00:23:28

the Lord Lord, how instead of saving

00:23:40

there, it is not the principle of economy of thinking

00:23:44

that does not describe it

00:23:46

in the process

00:23:49

at the same time it describes and creates.

00:23:52

These are fundamentally different approaches there.

00:23:56

If the natural world is really

00:23:59

described,

00:24:01

there is a need for excess complexity so that this

00:24:04

description can Well,

00:24:07

live and

00:24:09

develop, then further this is not the principle of

00:24:13

economy of thinking

00:24:16

this is another principle,

00:24:19

this is the principle of the development of thinking and it does

00:24:23

not describe And in the process of development it

00:24:24

creates, therefore this creation

00:24:29

creates artificial worlds But I

00:24:33

consider this precisely the principle of saving a man.

00:24:39

I really like that according to the principle of

00:24:42

redundancy, for any correct result there is

00:24:52

always something wrong,

00:24:55

hence the moment

00:24:57

what is in the biology of the family

00:25:01

the answer And this is where they put everything that

00:25:04

they can’t find a relatively decent

00:25:07

place in the Era of classification

00:25:09

Shilov likes to use the term worms along the

00:25:13

line they were worms still couldn’t

00:25:15

put them somewhere he called a worm but

00:25:18

it seems to me much more interesting

00:25:20

to philosophize very it seems that

00:25:24

having done some correct work, a

00:25:27

certain amount of error needs to be inserted into it.

00:25:31

But here is the question: What is the share? What is here, how to

00:25:34

insert it,

00:25:35

this is a very well-known question, in fact, the

00:25:38

first one would really say that

00:25:41

the partners play correctly, the game

00:25:44

ends in draws, so remember

00:25:46

always due to errors if your partner is

00:25:49

not mistaken, you really need to leave.

00:25:51

So we need to make a mistake,

00:25:54

then the party will lose balance, then

00:25:57

who will be able to manage this better?

00:25:59

Yes, you are creating for yourself that you will no longer

00:26:03

leave at all,

00:26:05

and this is the picture we will create; it’s not

00:26:08

strange at all. We came to this in a completely different language.

00:26:10

recent seminar in Perm

00:26:12

where for the first time the question was raised

00:26:16

that we do not need sufficient evidence in science,

00:26:19

we need some

00:26:22

insufficient argumentation which,

00:26:25

however, we are more or less satisfied with for

00:26:27

the future. And we posed the question

00:26:30

whether science is possible in principle with an insufficient

00:26:33

evidence base. I would even raise

00:26:35

there is an erroneous evidence base here. Is it possible to

00:26:38

work with this? The answer is apparently until the

00:26:39

next series, which

00:26:42

means the third principle is forbidden,

00:26:48

uh, a harsh judgment, all concepts

00:26:51

that are physical singularities

00:26:53

are,

00:26:56

for example, the concept of technological

00:26:59

singularity named after John and we always

00:27:02

forget the

00:27:08

evolutionary singularity,

00:27:10

and on this topic there is a very interesting thing like

00:27:13

once formally proven

00:27:15

if in your theory of singularity the

00:27:18

last step takes zero time,

00:27:21

therefore the first step in it took

00:27:23

infinite time But since in

00:27:26

practice this is not the case, there is neither one nor the

00:27:28

other

00:27:29

And this conclusion is believed for any evolutions

00:27:33

described by J curves

00:27:38

from here from this law We completely

00:27:41

unexpectedly discovered something extremely

00:27:43

interesting, something had to come to

00:27:47

us from previous universes before the Big

00:27:49

Bang, we called it operating before

00:27:52

the Universe, meaning literally the terms

00:27:55

from Van the Bunny eglo, it’s like there is a

00:27:59

single born one that begins with one

00:28:04

This is exactly before the Universe before the

00:28:06

Universe is born and this is very

00:28:08

interesting. Is it possible to find in today’s

00:28:10

Universe real signs of

00:28:12

existence, first of all, in general,

00:28:15

questions for the astrophysics laboratory,

00:28:24

everything is bad here,

00:28:27

that is, the problem is the following:

00:28:29

under Newton, the boundary of physics and metaphysics

00:28:32

was relatively clear, and

00:28:36

Newton could formulate it in the form of a

00:28:38

simple zero law,

00:28:41

omnipresent the husband has no influence on the movement of

00:28:43

physical bodies.

00:28:45

Now it turns out that everything is much worse.

00:28:48

And a lot depends. In what

00:28:50

direction are you moving? Are you going

00:28:53

from metaphysics to physics or vice versa, but

00:28:56

we don’t have a road from metaphysics;

00:28:59

oncological meta-anthological;

00:29:01

transcendental concept of Free Will;

00:29:06

imagine a textbook of this

00:29:09

mechanics in a conversation with conversations about

00:29:11

freedom you go instead of Freedom were

00:29:14

terminism determinism you have

00:29:17

the concept of possibility you do not know how to work with it

00:29:20

You come up with probabilities the

00:29:22

probability amplitude appears square

00:29:26

which is a probability and

00:29:29

then you feel good you

00:29:30

have mathematical formulas

00:29:32

attention question At what point on this

00:29:35

path did you leave the zone of metaphysics came

00:29:38

to the zone

00:29:40

of attention the question will come out on the contrary

00:29:43

wrote the Schrödinger equation We began to

00:29:46

solve it for a certain situation

00:29:47

we figured out the probabilities formulated the

00:29:51

Feymann principle As a variant of

00:29:53

Young’s principle we began to try to generalize one

00:29:56

macroscopic objects What can be

00:29:58

done look at Schedinger’s cat everyone’s

00:30:01

favorite In what moment you went into

00:30:03

metaphysics from physics,

00:30:05

there is a feeling that between physics and

00:30:07

metaphysics there is what Natasha

00:30:10

once called a gray zone somewhere where you

00:30:13

are going, at different moments you cross this

00:30:15

border and then the question is this a border or

00:30:18

something else

00:30:20

Allah knows it that in general this is where the

00:30:24

next layer arises about the heterogeneous basis I

00:30:27

already managed to say

00:30:29

from here it was an interesting consequence

00:30:31

that we are all Anti-positivists,

00:30:34

I believe that the cognizing subject is

00:30:38

linguistic constructions and everything else is a

00:30:44

very interesting consequence of the

00:30:48

seminar itself in poetry that poetry is

00:30:52

autocatalytic a tool for working with

00:30:54

language, that is, which itself changes

00:30:57

the profession of this work, and then it turns out

00:31:00

that together the Strugatskys, what is called

00:31:02

by abstraction, poetry itself, is good

00:31:05

and it is necessary from time to time, probably, except for

00:31:07

mathematics. We have two examples that are more useful than

00:31:10

mathematics, and here and there there is an

00:31:11

autocatalytic loop, the next layer

00:31:34

this is precisely the

00:31:37

motivation for the transition from metaphysics

00:31:41

this is the transition of the

00:32:09

gray belt

00:32:16

and poetry this is

00:32:19

what allows us to pass the

00:32:23

point of singularity

00:32:26

and the method singular processes was

00:32:30

what poetry

00:32:32

This must pass

00:32:35

this is the organization of the transition through the

00:32:40

quasi-singularity this is what remains

00:32:42

for us or what becomes clear us from

00:32:46

another world

00:32:50

who were absent from the May seminar of noise

00:32:52

when they began

00:32:55

and I wrote, quoting the well-known film

00:32:57

Liberation, namely the series of directions of

00:33:00

the main attack, the following phrase to him: The

00:33:03

black road passed for the infantry. And

00:33:06

if we pave these, they will pass like this. It

00:33:10

looks like poetry is a way of

00:33:12

moving along black road where we have And

00:33:15

this is the road that connects before us

00:33:18

all the laws with all their deviations everything is

00:33:21

in order with all the chaos

00:33:23

so that it’s not just order But everything is in order with

00:33:26

all the chaos

00:33:27

correctly these are just mistakes This is a pure

00:33:32

mistake Well okay Well, okay this is pure

00:33:37

errors and this is its significance, this is its significance

00:33:42

I’m talking about the language in his language,

00:33:49

but because I’m assembling a laboratory And

00:33:52

we studied

00:33:59

in his language, he said, and he has a different

00:34:04

African language in this case,

00:34:23

such a good example of such

00:34:26

poetry as moving along a black road, yes

00:34:31

whatever you want,

00:34:47

but whatever I mean, the entire

00:34:50

World Health Organization is now there,

00:34:53

unfortunately unfortunately it was not possible to

00:34:55

move here. We formulated this a long time ago in the

00:35:00

humanities, we understand that this

00:35:02

apparently works in the natural sciences,

00:35:05

and in this regard, the

00:35:08

uncertainty of the impulse coordinate

00:35:10

implies a triple why -yet, but

00:35:14

we weren’t able to move there; moreover,

00:35:15

we couldn’t understand what type of laws

00:35:18

corresponds to the three uncertainties,

00:35:21

so this is a negative Result of something that does

00:35:24

n’t exist, the next layer

00:35:26

And you can return it. But there at the very end,

00:35:29

what was where the shift in quantum

00:35:31

mechanics is, that’s what it is in view of

00:35:34

reflection of understanding of displacements What do you

00:35:37

understand dedication of

00:35:45

such reflection I know what

00:35:47

understanding is I understand at the same time I believe that

00:35:50

Understanding occurs dialogues about reflection

00:35:53

happens personally this is what happens

00:35:56

personal reflection does

00:36:01

Well what is displacement this is very important I

00:36:05

just want to understand I understand come on so

00:36:08

we had a whole initiation seminar, I

00:36:11

will say the simplest understanding of that,

00:36:19

understanding of that

00:36:22

and this is a

00:36:23

reflexive fixation,

00:36:26

but in principle for me, reflection,

00:36:29

understanding of displacement form exactly the

00:36:32

same triple balance of triple

00:36:33

uncertainty, this is connected with the usual

00:36:36

understanding, the

00:36:40

displacement turns out to be taken immediately by

00:36:44

reflection and understanding

00:36:50

exactly like this

00:36:56

What was meant here is the following: in

00:36:59

quantum mechanics, she deals a lot with

00:37:01

reflection because for her the concept of a

00:37:03

reflective observer is key for her,

00:37:06

naturally, everything is more or less

00:37:08

obvious,

00:37:10

but how did quantum mechanics

00:37:13

introduce uncertainty into itself?

00:37:24

This is a rather curious conclusion that

00:37:27

was made just

00:37:30

tactical Will I have a Will This

00:37:34

means that I am doing something Although my

00:37:36

resources and with something Why am I doing In the name of

00:37:39

my picture of the world the triumph of communism,

00:37:41

the triumph of the cause of Christ and so on is

00:37:44

my will

00:37:46

that so strategic When my

00:37:50

picture of the world dies, I still look for or

00:37:53

create another picture instead of

00:37:56

calmly winning in this situation like a

00:37:58

proper person, but if your

00:38:01

picture of the world has died, why should you live,

00:38:03

but if this is the Will,

00:38:07

what makes

00:38:09

it much more interesting

00:38:17

here it can also be very long,

00:38:19

but here it is long within the framework of the original

00:38:22

picture,

00:38:24

well, a person there, in the name of the conventionally Russian

00:38:27

Empire, can go to the ends of the world to live in

00:38:31

incomprehensible conditions

00:38:32

from It is not clear what to build a ship and

00:38:35

discover Russian America and so on and

00:38:37

his whole life is a long Will to put

00:38:40

push the boundaries of this

00:38:41

empire, this is the Russian British Empire, this is how

00:38:44

scientific theories were created so

00:38:47

often, something else was asked here, and

00:38:50

you do all this, suddenly it turns out that

00:38:53

your Empire died just in the

00:38:55

year eighty-six, it no longer exists, you

00:38:59

can continue to go to the ends of the world just for the

00:39:01

sake of what got there is already the

00:39:07

Will implementation

00:39:13

therefore right here The question is not in

00:39:16

length

00:39:18

but a very important question is that this is the Will

00:39:22

to transition to do the

00:39:23

first thing with it Clear Will collapses

00:39:25

what they do here

00:39:32

in most cases

00:39:35

if a valuable number is from the keys and it is

00:39:39

precisely a

00:39:41

hypothesis that is strategic Will

00:39:43

generates transboundary processes, and in

00:39:46

this case, if your suicide is the idea of

00:39:49

going through a transboundary process through

00:39:51

death. That is, you don’t assume that

00:39:54

death is completion, I assume that

00:39:55

transboundaryness then of course yes. And if

00:39:59

the idea of death is like this whole world

00:40:01

got me, I wasn’t here anymore.

00:40:03

with me it’s absolutely this, of course, there’s a

00:40:05

relationship of probability to this.

00:40:10

Or maybe they just

00:40:12

didn’t give strategic will,

00:40:15

like yesterday I drew attention to

00:40:18

such a historical thing that in the 90s,

00:40:21

just when the

00:40:23

events that you are now describing happened,

00:40:25

people went into

00:40:27

into the

00:40:29

role-playing movement into reconstruction

00:40:32

reconstruction and so on, but now

00:40:35

we can now perceive this as some kind of

00:40:39

Tarutin maneuver, that’s when later

00:40:42

These people, uh,

00:40:43

returned to the Internet in the 2000s and in the

00:40:46

tenth of the hybrid war.

00:40:48

Here is an example of strategic will and there Yes

00:40:51

indeed there there was a cross-border

00:40:53

process, it’s clear role-players, reenactors,

00:40:56

this is different compared to the Soviet

00:40:58

Union, they didn’t return, but were used,

00:41:00

I’m curious about Britain, where it happened

00:41:05

50 years earlier, they are handing over, there will be

00:41:08

someone who also left this,

00:41:10

they returned. In fact, I have, to be

00:41:12

honest, no answer here. The Empire here

00:41:15

as a very simply trivial

00:41:17

example is much more interesting here is

00:41:19

the situation when, for example, it is not

00:41:23

some unfortunate Empire that

00:41:24

belongs to that time of the state that

00:41:26

is destroyed, but something related to

00:41:29

UFOs and higher things is destroyed. Well, for example, uh,

00:41:34

what happened when it began

00:41:36

Bykov's transition When the

00:41:40

scholasticism disappeared from that and in a certain

00:41:42

background for some time the ontology of

00:41:44

God in general disappeared.

00:41:46

You see, maybe for me the

00:41:48

strategic Will is

00:41:50

my favorite fairy tale of the phallus, known to everyone,

00:41:52

here about the princess grass and so

00:41:55

on,

00:42:08

and this is proof that an actor is

00:42:11

subject to meaningful schizophrenia as a

00:42:13

person He lives in time And how do you

00:42:16

live Outside of time and at the same time both

00:42:19

must be taken into account by the way

00:42:21

Interesting situation It seems that this is

00:42:23

generally a requirement as a

00:42:26

person cannot do this

00:42:30

But by the way there is a good quote on this topic there

00:42:33

is a dead end there is

00:42:37

when King Wilhelm tells Bismarck

00:42:41

all this will end with the fact that they

00:42:43

put a guillotine here for you and me and the pipes

00:42:46

First for you then for me to which Bismar

00:42:49

shakes the tick says Well, why did you

00:42:52

write an extra

00:42:59

expression sounds like the author

00:43:02

designs and creates time because

00:43:05

he is the same in the times time of a step of development,

00:43:07

this is, excuse me, an

00:43:08

assumption that is not reflective,

00:43:12

but rather the author is projecting time. And in

00:43:15

what own times and ideologies

00:43:19

is this a secondary

00:43:21

statement that is stronger,

00:43:28

therefore I won’t argue, this is

00:43:31

really so, it seems to me that here

00:43:33

an actor he becomes a person when he

00:43:37

finds himself on the periphery of himself, that

00:43:39

is, this is actually in fact, he

00:43:43

is in some kind of unity if he does not

00:43:46

live in time. He is definitely on

00:43:48

the periphery, he creates time, but when he does not

00:43:51

understand that he is creating time, he lives in

00:43:53

time,

00:43:56

he does not live. I like

00:43:59

Andrey’s definition, all these things for the person

00:44:01

who has an anthology of the element

00:44:04

ontology are relevant modern

00:44:06

instruments and also Will And now how

00:44:09

is it and now we are starting

00:44:25

competitions

00:44:30

on this topic, we studied a lot in the

00:44:33

fifteenth year, just in case,

00:44:36

just to these materials they have all the

00:44:40

magical representations of time, I for

00:44:44

special cases from a huge number of

00:44:46

so-called poetic representations of

00:44:48

time that cannot be reduced

00:44:52

one of the topics that I believe our

00:44:55

theory groups will be dealing with here is in which

00:44:57

attempts to move thinking with a pattern to

00:45:02

fabrics we will not get to, we dismantled the threads

00:45:05

in the fourteenth year and weaving

00:45:07

ultimately ended with 15

00:45:12

pieces, this situation where you have a number to

00:45:16

come not new percentages as a single

00:45:18

element of the Internet, you missed a very

00:45:20

important stage, we worked for a very long time,

00:45:26

so of course this is the base from the

00:45:30

labyrinth, patterns and

00:45:32

ornaments jump out

00:45:45

of it, weave, pull out the thread,

00:45:49

I forgot that your thread is from a clump of wool,

00:45:53

the thread for me is a way of thinking,

00:45:56

I hear you, we are hanging the situation Africa I

00:46:00

’ll start on the one hand No, it’s still leaving for nothing,

00:46:02

that is, I do

00:46:04

n’t need this situation now

00:46:06

because you don’t want to

00:46:08

go back into the ball of wool, of course I don’t

00:46:10

want to

00:46:11

He definitely don’t want it

00:46:21

here, respectively, a

00:46:23

snide remark that the two schemes that

00:46:27

Georgiy Petrovich loved are the four-layer and the

00:46:29

scheme steps of thinking in general, steps of development,

00:46:32

generally speaking,

00:46:34

cannot be correctly coordinated.

00:46:38

This is the answer to the question. We are in the scheme of

00:46:42

thinking. Why, excuse me, of course there’s not

00:46:46

a damn thing there, they’re not synchronized by

00:46:49

evolutionary operators, they’re

00:46:51

a jump, they just belong to

00:46:56

different formats

00:46:58

for different tasks

00:47:01

if there’s no synchronization time in three

00:47:05

[ __ ] what

00:47:09

[music]

00:47:10

I’ll talk about it

00:47:13

Why are we approaching completion of the

00:47:15

transistor model of information

00:47:17

flows

00:47:19

This is very wild from my point of view

00:47:23

now it’s shut up from my point of view

00:47:26

wildly interesting

00:47:28

Who remembers the circuit itself This is the

00:47:31

transistor

00:47:34

model we came up with here a year and a half ago

00:47:36

on the workbench before the laboratory there

00:47:40

was such a picture. We became interested

00:47:42

once again in the phenomenon of

00:47:43

Indo-European civilization,

00:47:45

they said that it might be tired of searching about the

00:47:48

Motherland and on the Europeans, I quoted the

00:47:51

concept begins on Saturday, unfortunately,

00:47:54

all the results were extremely

00:47:56

inaccurate enough

00:47:57

and indeed a map was simply shown

00:47:59

Eurasia where the Homelands are depicted for

00:48:03

Europeans according to different theories. Here they are all of

00:48:05

Eurasia, frankly neatly, and they have covered

00:48:08

it; they have posed a different question. Yes, it doesn’t

00:48:10

matter where the movement began; the more

00:48:12

interesting question is Where does it end?

00:48:16

Two laws of movement were invented

00:48:18

that obey the anthropoflow, by the way.

00:48:21

Everything that was given in genetics but in the sense of

00:48:23

gene markers fully confirms

00:48:25

that the flow always has intention and there is a

00:48:29

strict ban on moving back in

00:48:31

one’s own tracks. But roughly speaking, if

00:48:33

you have elves going west after the Sun in the

00:48:37

current model, they cannot turn

00:48:39

back and go east back, although

00:48:41

they can turn south then quietly

00:48:44

and to make a large loop is quite

00:48:47

possible, but a direct return to the

00:48:48

tracks is still impossible,

00:48:50

which means that if you have an anthropological flow that

00:48:53

has entered,

00:48:54

uh, a drainage place where

00:48:58

all peoples cannot move further from, at the same time,

00:49:01

they cannot return back because the knock

00:49:03

comes back, you have to go back and it

00:49:06

doesn’t move forward either, and we talked about the fact that there

00:49:09

are good bad sources and in good

00:49:12

drains the energy of movement happens and the energy of movement

00:49:15

turns into energy.

00:49:17

Now we have analyzed civilization in detail,

00:49:22

so there is a point of view that

00:49:24

information flows obey

00:49:26

absolutely the same rules,

00:49:30

respectively, mapping science in general,

00:49:33

correction knowledge is the definition of

00:49:35

where we have good sources And where are the bad ones

00:49:38

And with good drains where

00:49:40

aromorphosis and civilization will occur we

00:49:42

will work and bad drains Well, she died

00:49:45

so skillfully because she should not die Do

00:49:51

you have helian flows information

00:49:54

flow of synonyms No of course So why are

00:49:56

you doing this did

00:49:59

I’m not talking here in the Agilean flow Well, of

00:50:02

course you’re discussing this cannot be

00:50:03

discussed in information

00:50:07

medicines

00:50:09

in this case

00:50:13

I always write In such cases when

00:50:16

they do it as an article they are like a presentation

00:50:19

that I in this case use an information server I

00:50:23

don’t mean not Wiener’s

00:50:26

Nischen definition of how a kind of

00:50:29

torment that speaks about something that we

00:50:31

intuitively understand and that cannot be reduced to the

00:50:34

standard concept of information,

00:50:36

and all AI technicians understand you

00:50:39

in this way, well,

00:50:42

specifically that they are using the concept of

00:50:46

information flows. This means that,

00:50:48

roughly speaking, there are external loans,

00:50:50

power, incandescent current. Oh,

00:50:53

by the way if we speak

00:50:56

as an external force,

00:51:01

what is here, what is for me, and you can also

00:51:03

go back for a second, what is

00:51:05

very fundamentally important for me here? It

00:51:07

seems to me that I may be mistaken that this

00:51:12

model

00:51:13

makes it possible to resolve so-called

00:51:16

unresolvable conflicts

00:51:19

as humanly Well, between man and

00:51:22

man So for example, between

00:51:24

religions, theories, or for example, between

00:51:27

Armenia and Azerbaijan, the

00:51:29

essence appeared to be the following: the

00:51:32

parties who want to find a solution

00:51:35

to the conflict begin to conduct their dialogue according to

00:51:39

these two rules,

00:51:42

they have a tendency to move, they

00:51:44

want to solve, and secondly, they are prohibited from

00:51:48

moving back. That is, if we during

00:51:51

our conversation for a very long time, perhaps we

00:51:53

agreed on something and agreed here,

00:51:57

we have a common position, then we can

00:52:00

only move forward, we cannot

00:52:02

tell,

00:52:05

I remind you for those who at one

00:52:08

time attended the famous game on the civil

00:52:11

war in Russia,

00:52:13

Aleksovsky there was a moment when

00:52:16

there is a conference of

00:52:18

whites and reds on the prince’s islands, but they start

00:52:20

Naturally with who killed whom,

00:52:22

who violated what, after which

00:52:26

the question is asked, but now

00:52:29

the Americans have set up in Arkhangelsk and are starting to

00:52:32

move south, so you and

00:52:34

I have the same opinion about this, the white side is

00:52:37

unacceptable Red side no, we do

00:52:39

n’t need the Americans there, we agreed,

00:52:42

we have a point from which we are where we have the

00:52:45

same position. As you remember from the

00:52:48

game, after a while the positions were

00:52:50

generally well coordinated

00:52:52

because the one who took the first step and

00:52:55

fixed it further moved forward

00:52:57

from him, maybe this way creates a

00:53:01

new conflictology I would really

00:53:02

like this, you can literally put 5 kopecks here

00:53:06

as a participant The fact is that in

00:53:10

that game this point was not even a

00:53:13

landing there in Arkhangelsk it was the position of the

00:53:15

peasants in the person of Batyuk and the desire of

00:53:20

both sides to win him over to theirs

00:53:22

side there were many points I meant

00:53:24

that I did it myself I wrote it down It

00:53:27

started with this and then they were found

00:53:29

Another point the third fourth I understand it’s

00:53:32

just here The trick is that these

00:53:34

peasants they were just the

00:53:37

incandescent current that is all this Yes,

00:53:41

now the following is

00:53:44

also a basic topic that I believe

00:53:47

will be on theory, we have here

00:53:50

attempts to find commonality between

00:53:53

legal laws and the laws of nature,

00:53:56

both are discursive imperative

00:53:59

requirements in the first case,

00:54:01

society is subordinated in the second universe,

00:54:03

then we have found four basic forms of

00:54:07

discursive imperative laws such as a

00:54:09

strip of

00:54:12

discursiveness, a judgment

00:54:14

united by architecture,

00:54:16

narrative imperative principles that do not

00:54:19

allow verification such as the anthropic or the

00:54:21

king,

00:54:22

and finally, a narrative narrative, an

00:54:24

honest representation of ontologies on the topic of

00:54:27

what can and cannot be. Well, for

00:54:29

example, close range,

00:54:32

probably this list has nothing to do with it, this is what

00:54:36

we drew. It’s not a fact that That's all I

00:54:39

have two questions, the

00:54:41

first is the code,

00:54:47

and how are they? The

00:54:50

second question is even more interesting,

00:54:53

actually, the legal law in it is

00:54:56

not the main thing, the law in it is a criminal object

00:54:59

and the relationship between them, the objects of the law

00:55:04

can be a variety of designs,

00:55:07

social groups, people, and so on,

00:55:10

the question is What are objects of laws, it

00:55:15

is clear that the answer like an atom of an electronic

00:55:18

planet does not suit me. I ask in

00:55:20

the language, we

00:55:23

have Newton’s law stating something there.

00:55:25

What are the objects of

00:55:28

connection between which

00:55:30

this law establishes the next one is

00:55:48

[music]

00:55:54

this is an assembly of points of falsification where can

00:55:59

happen in in the near future, well, there’s a couple of

00:56:02

thousand years, a

00:56:03

replacement for one reading of the future or a

00:56:07

reading of time in general

00:56:14

[music]

00:56:21

and here, for example, a concept like the

00:56:24

question What to do with concepts like time,

00:56:27

which is too mosquitoes,

00:56:31

which includes too many things and it’s

00:56:34

completely unclear what we should do with

00:56:36

different ones Well, and so on and so on All

00:56:39

this was described in detail,

00:56:42

I will not repeat, but here we have a pretty

00:56:44

decent mapping of these very points of

00:56:47

falsification with some of them similar to

00:56:49

the year they work with some of the

00:56:55

new basic hundred-process of what

00:56:58

should come after the sun

00:57:01

three human processes of throwing out

00:57:04

[music]

00:57:05

so here excellent This is of course not the

00:57:08

destruction of entertainment

00:57:12

with the subconscious, it is useless to fight

00:57:17

creation salvation of wanderings

00:57:28

Alchemy by migration Alchemy as a language +

00:57:32

a way of thinking or call

00:57:35

alchemical thinking you need to become somewhere

00:57:41

so the next

00:57:43

context

00:57:47

is just a diagram while the Forest

00:57:52

leaf of physics

00:58:11

area

00:58:29

accordingly there are

00:58:32

quite a lot of swampy places but those I would like to draw

00:58:34

your attention to the fact that in general the map

00:58:36

turns out well,

00:58:39

friends, this is actually the first

00:58:42

good card result that

00:58:44

can at least relate to one area, this

00:58:47

area of astrophysics in four four

00:58:49

positions, of course it’s a bad map,

00:58:53

maybe our artists will be able to do something

00:58:54

do it, but this is an attempt,

00:58:57

this solid line

00:59:00

on the right should go to the dotted line or be

00:59:03

Here Yes, they are, they can be a

00:59:08

solid distracting technique is

00:59:10

that specifically in my editor,

00:59:15

that is, we will assume that it is dotted,

00:59:18

it really should

00:59:21

disappear here Then say it’s punctuated and

00:59:23

then it’s

00:59:24

actually there, but I just

00:59:27

couldn’t draw it

00:59:29

and

00:59:30

the only thing is that the assembly of drawing this

00:59:32

map began the phrase the map was not made,

00:59:34

but you hang in there, but then

00:59:37

somehow it suddenly began

00:59:39

to assemble by itself and now it seems to me that this

00:59:43

Of course, an approximate level map of America

00:59:45

where a piece of the coast is drawn and there is

00:59:48

a Delta like the Amazon, but nevertheless, you

00:59:54

can still give an idea of America, too, this is

00:59:58

what it is, but I

01:00:03

understood everything,

01:00:07

I actually wanted this salad

01:00:10

Show the question,

01:00:11

this is actually an attempt to collect everything that

01:00:15

was done last year from the point of view of the

01:00:21

theory laboratory,

01:00:24

and here, in fact, all the

01:00:26

connections that arise, all the

01:00:28

structures that arise, which I tried

01:00:31

to draw the

01:00:33

next layer before,

01:00:35

but this is the wall

01:00:38

here, in

01:00:39

detail the assembly was done

01:00:43

taking into account all the laboratories that I

01:00:46

more or less recorded every month

01:00:48

I created my own the wall, every month something

01:00:50

was removed from it and something

01:00:53

was added accordingly, this is the last May

01:00:56

Wall,

01:00:58

so it’s relatively smart for us, in

01:01:02

principle, there’s a very good density of

01:01:04

information here,

01:01:06

working with it is possible and even probably

01:01:09

pleasant, but for some reason no one wants

01:01:11

a smiley

01:01:13

How did it turn out so easy

01:01:16

to apply this every day agree

01:01:22

to do that text you

01:01:46

can use this map you are strict with it the

01:01:51

rest must either go through the

01:01:55

construction process with you it’s

01:01:57

just simple training or build

01:02:01

your own map map this is the most absolutely

01:02:04

accurate this is your map in order to

01:02:07

to use it you need to have your

01:02:09

view, your erudition and your way

01:02:11

which

01:02:14

And the questions that are here next means

01:02:17

I won’t read the latest collections of them, I’ll just

01:02:19

show these are the questions that we

01:02:21

had that no answers were found,

01:02:23

in fact, on these slides

01:02:26

there are three questions,

01:02:39

in contrast to the procedure

01:02:53

This is what I really like: what projects

01:02:55

arise if the laws in the code of nature

01:02:57

contradict I would cross it out right away

01:03:00

because the code and nature are the first

01:03:02

contradiction in nature, there are no contradictions

01:03:04

There, everything works harmoniously and the code is a

01:03:07

Linear scheme Therefore,

01:03:09

contradictions arise in it I am returning this

01:03:12

design which I'm building in the

01:03:15

area of the 17th century, positivist

01:03:17

science arose. I read positivist science

01:03:19

built a description of nature, a broader system. I

01:03:24

ask a question. If we consider this system of laws

01:03:28

as a code, that is, as

01:03:30

Legality connected by certain rules

01:03:32

among themselves, which in general in

01:03:35

universities We tried to do throughout the seventeenth eighteenth

01:03:39

nineteenth and twentieth of the Capital

01:03:42

and return to understanding nature. Let's

01:03:45

start with the fact that we cannot demolish

01:03:47

the code because we have nothing special to

01:03:49

demolish,

01:03:50

but I pose the question of a completely different

01:04:02

physics separately. Civil, for example, there is

01:04:05

chemistry and this is this collection of the

01:04:08

codex. it exists and they

01:04:10

periodically connect with each other there,

01:04:14

all the same problems cannot be demolished

01:04:19

in any case,

01:04:22

the first thing I want to say is that there are a

01:04:25

lot of codes, and in the entire history of the Georgian and there

01:04:28

were three of them, the

01:04:29

Justinian code, but I do not consider the

01:04:31

Justinian code to be a legal level

01:04:34

Napoleon and the attempt to create a

01:04:37

German code By the way, it was

01:04:40

never completed after the battle

01:04:46

When a contradiction arises in the legal code

01:04:49

For example, I really love

01:04:51

the contradiction between 130-17 Federal

01:04:54

Law of Russia

01:04:56

172 they said that it is necessary to strategize

01:05:00

from top to bottom A 131 that the Municipal

01:05:03

entity is self-sufficient and

01:05:05

cannot be maybe someone else's higher

01:05:08

strategy here is a specific contradiction,

01:05:10

it sets two movements

01:05:12

and on these two movements a lot of

01:05:16

interesting projects arise

01:05:18

that you can work with and we

01:05:20

work on reality in life I

01:05:23

ask a question, here we have the laws of

01:05:25

Prigogine's organization of dermadynamics and the

01:05:28

laws of equipotential thermodynamics

01:05:30

formally showing each other the question of

01:05:32

how to work with this contradiction, it

01:05:34

is, we

01:05:37

are talking about whether nature exists

01:05:40

independently of our ideas from the

01:05:43

code, how and Does law exist,

01:05:46

regardless of legal codes, just

01:05:50

a second, these questions are there.

01:05:53

I pose another question,

01:05:57

one of the questions

01:06:13

[laughter]

01:06:23

Why do we have to we need to compile everything

01:06:26

there, the law of nature, there is a clear entrance,

01:06:31

we just don’t see any nature,

01:06:33

no right until we see

01:06:36

these glasses,

01:06:39

so that later we can archive it all

01:06:42

and we can move

01:06:43

on, a way of cognition. I would like it to

01:06:46

be that Yes, I have this question

01:06:50

arose here, well, according to the law, you said that

01:06:53

they living do this on purpose so

01:06:54

that everything ends

01:06:58

[music]

01:07:01

laws code, there is legal

01:07:03

taxes,

01:07:04

yes And then more legal code,

01:07:08

justice is above the law Is there such a

01:07:10

concept here? There is

01:07:13

no At the moment

01:07:26

What is a change in the law of nature we

01:07:30

talked about that now there is a change from

01:07:32

one principle to another, what is it,

01:07:34

what does it mean

Description:

Вводный доклад Сергея Переслегина на семинаре "Котлы 2017": http://sociosoft.ru/news/Kotly_2017 о результатах работы лаборатории "Теорийка" (Мышление 3.0) за год, о базовых принципах Мышления 3.0 ("Лабораториум 2016 – 2017: мышление и вокруг". Основные результаты согласно видению лаборатории теорийки). Презентация к докладу: https://www.slideshare.net/lukoshka/20162017-77240089 Наши контакты: http://sociosoft.ru/ http://psychotechnology.ru/ https://vk.com/sociosoft

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Сергей Переслегин. Семинар "Котлы-2017". Избыточность, сложность, ошибочность и Мышление 3.0"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.