Download "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FsYG7fGC5BmA%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
Table of contents
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FMG0u72UCTkU%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FQHTbK2UTSeM%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FRE2D9h3_4b8%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FaNF7YUvxVg4%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252Fab8cKGublHI%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FiUdoOsDUMOA%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FYBbc50TmjDs%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
Russian
00:00:01
[music]00:00:13
[music]00:00:16
Hello This is the editorial context, let's look00:00:18
into the details of the news agenda, the00:00:20
wording of the sentence with confiscation00:00:22
of property Until recently, it was more often used00:00:25
by historians than by lawyers, this00:00:28
measure of punishment was regularly changed in the USSR,00:00:31
including during the era of repression, but also later and00:00:34
in In the new Russia in 2003, this provision00:00:37
was completely excluded from the criminal code, then00:00:39
confiscation returned, but in practice it was00:00:41
not used very often, and now they00:00:43
are going to confiscate property as an00:00:46
additional punishment under articles about00:00:48
fakes and discrediting the army and actions00:00:50
against the security of Russia. The document was00:00:53
adopted by the Duma in the first reading almost00:00:55
instantly and this week is already the second00:00:57
reading. How do its creators explain such00:01:01
urgency? Is it true that it was created00:01:03
specifically for artists who left and am critical00:01:06
of Russia’s actions?00:01:08
What precedents are created by the new00:01:11
norm? And why in this story there is00:01:13
actually nothing new in the context Ilya00:01:16
[music]00:01:20
Egorov, anyone who from00:01:23
now on tries to harm his00:01:26
homeland, his country and the citizens of the Russian00:01:30
Federation will lose everything and die there00:01:34
outside our country like the last00:01:37
dog On January 24, before the plenary00:01:40
session of the State Duma, a deputy from the LDPR00:01:43
explains the meaning of the00:01:44
confiscation bill, then if you, in fact,00:01:47
publicly00:01:48
call for violating the00:01:50
national security of our country,00:01:52
then in addition to the fact that you should spend a little time00:01:55
in prison, you should lose00:01:57
your apartment, your house,00:02:00
money and any other property that00:02:03
you have the right to use, the bill on00:02:05
amendments to the Criminal Code00:02:07
provides for the confiscation of property under00:02:09
six articles, including fakes about the00:02:11
Russian army, a few hours later00:02:14
it will be adopted in the first reading almost00:02:16
unanimously for00:02:19
395 against three00:02:24
abstentions, adopted Congratulations00:02:28
to my colleagues, an00:02:31
almost unprecedented story of a00:02:34
man from the new people of the Irgeyrn Communist00:02:38
Party of the Russian Federation This is one of the most probably00:02:42
controversial bills that, again,00:02:45
were Probably timely00:02:48
because I think something like this was expected,00:02:51
some kind of00:02:56
[music]00:02:58
initiative00:03:00
that was started long00:03:04
before the special operation and naturally accelerated00:03:08
at its peak. And of course, partly this is00:03:11
aimed at artists, relatively00:03:15
speaking, who speak out from00:03:17
abroad regarding what is happening in00:03:20
Russia and in the world, I believe that Lugovoi00:03:22
has the right to his opinion, this00:03:25
time in this regard, a person who has the00:03:28
same life cycle, and00:03:32
I would speak in exactly the same way on this issue. Well, I’m00:03:36
not ready to say that yet, and I’m not ready00:03:37
to say that no By the way, I may be in00:03:39
some places if it’s not under the camera of00:03:42
individual characters who today are00:03:43
from there like Slepakov, you know who00:03:46
recorded00:03:47
humiliating our Russian mothers, I00:03:49
would say even more harshly how it00:03:51
happened that you singing means against00:03:53
our Russian mothers who00:03:55
raised their children in the spirit00:03:57
of patriotism, sitting today in Israel,00:03:59
you won’t sing the same song and let’s see what they00:04:02
will do to you in Israel. Our dear one in00:04:04
quotes, yes, that is, a singer with a guitar, one00:04:07
of the three deputies who voted against00:04:09
the law, Ksenia Goryacheva from the New00:04:12
People faction, we were on the mend Well, for about 200:04:15
days, well, that is, even before we00:04:17
considered it two sixths, we should have00:04:19
already submitted the amendments,00:04:21
and the likelihood is that00:04:24
some block of amendments will suddenly be added, taking into account the fact that there are00:04:28
more deputies who are the authors of the bill.00:04:30
I sincerely have little faith in us even when the00:04:33
lawyers there made this approach; it was00:04:35
very difficult for us to even formulate our amendments00:04:36
because everyone spoke in unison00:04:38
and there human rights activists also00:04:41
discussed it with Eva Merch, that this law00:04:44
simply cannot be passed. To me, this00:04:47
bill00:04:49
seemed absolutely inconsistent with00:04:52
the Constitution; my lawyers and I thought about00:04:54
this and came to the conclusion that it is00:04:56
impossible to correct something there so00:04:59
that it00:05:00
changes. Probably some main00:05:02
component of this bill and so00:05:04
that it becomes not00:05:06
so different from what I said,00:05:08
sadly, the position that is in00:05:10
parliament corresponds to the spirit of the00:05:12
times and the demand that exists in00:05:14
society it’s easy no everyone likes no they00:05:18
will take away property it is necessary to take away00:05:21
property it is necessary to take away regalia it is necessary to00:05:24
take away titles and other certain00:05:26
actions reduce them to complete zero leave the00:05:29
means for subsistence and let them00:05:31
sit Who is in Israel Who is in Europe Who is in00:05:33
America or Dubai and from there then with00:05:36
their last pennies and the Barysh conduct their00:05:38
activities, and upon arriving on the00:05:40
territory of Russia they will be held accountable to the fullest00:05:42
extent of the law for what exactly they will have to00:05:44
answer to the fullest extent of the law with00:05:46
property and also state00:05:48
awards and titles, firstly, as has already been00:05:50
said, these are fakes and discreditation00:05:53
armies, further calls for extremism,00:05:56
sanctions for activities against the00:05:58
security and integrity of Russia, also00:06:01
assistance in decisions of international00:06:03
organizations in which Russia does not00:06:05
participate. Well, obviously, this means, in00:06:07
particular, the international criminal court and00:06:10
for the rehabilitation of Nazism Let's talk about00:06:12
specific characters, if possible,00:06:14
Nevzorov is sitting in Europe today for a long00:06:16
time he was, you know, like a cow00:06:18
licked his lips, you know perfectly well, he was00:06:21
welcome, he was allowed everything. He sat00:06:24
quietly in his00:06:26
luxurious apartment in St. Petersburg, criticized from there the00:06:29
Russian Orthodox Church, Russian00:06:31
society as a whole, that is, and expressed his00:06:33
own opinions about him.00:06:35
no one touched him and he lived happily for a long time00:06:37
because he was in the system of the00:06:39
so-called elected. You know that00:06:41
he was a deputy of the State Duma00:06:43
without even a glance. And you know that he00:06:45
practically did not attend the plenary00:06:47
session, which means he didn’t give00:06:49
a damn about the attitude of the State Duma in general00:06:51
my obligations to society and00:06:54
to society as a whole, that is, I ignore it while00:06:55
receiving my salary. Well, our00:06:57
faction as a whole opposed this00:06:59
bill. She did not support it. Yes,00:07:01
deputies in the State Duma should understand that there00:07:06
is no consensus on this bill. Despite the fact that he has such there are many00:07:08
co-authors and he is not in the Duma or in00:07:11
society, and in general00:07:13
there is a button against this, but this00:07:15
time it seemed that it was very important00:07:19
because the punishment that00:07:20
this bill nevertheless provides for, but00:07:23
they are excessive and, in general, already in00:07:26
are regulated in many ways by the criminal code. I00:07:28
believe that those who vote against00:07:31
this kind of bills in today’s00:07:33
realities of the stage in which we00:07:34
are and in the participation in which we00:07:37
are, they are trying more00:07:39
to show that they supposedly00:07:41
represent something and their position as as if00:07:44
they knew this, so we mean our house00:07:48
with a vote00:07:50
by name, this question will be, believe me,00:07:53
very important, including when assessing00:07:58
deputies,00:08:00
no one can own their property00:08:02
Otherwise than by a court decision, but may be00:08:04
limited in the rights to dispose of it on the00:08:07
basis of seizure00:08:09
constitutionality the law will be checked by the00:08:11
constitutional court after we00:08:14
see the first criminal case and00:08:16
law enforcement practice in this00:08:18
case, I believe that the constitutional court in00:08:21
its current composition will consider that this00:08:23
law fully complies with00:08:24
the Constitution in whatever form it is00:08:28
adopted, which were prosecuted for fakes but00:08:31
they have nothing except a tiny00:08:33
room in a communal apartment and to take00:08:36
this room away from a person just because00:08:38
he expressed his position, of course it’s not00:08:40
constitutional when you take and00:08:42
show a small example from some00:08:45
apartment. You’re actually exaggerating what00:08:49
this bill has been about for a long time.00:08:52
the category of personality remained not What is00:08:55
called in brackets and00:08:57
legislative and other defined00:08:59
because enter the cohort of supposedly chosen00:09:02
so-00:09:03
called or00:09:06
[music]00:09:10
those interpretations that the legislator has now offered us,00:09:29
believing that after all with good intentions00:09:31
you are more on the road You yourself understand where00:09:34
Than The more vague the formulation, the00:09:36
more it can generally be summed up and a00:09:38
person, for example, I don’t know, may be00:09:40
indignant at the fact that the00:09:43
utility workers have poorly cleaned up his yard, someone will say00:09:45
that yes, look, this is some kind of00:09:47
open call from00:09:58
rebels who are conducting political00:10:00
activities, but according to in fact,00:10:02
ordinary journalists ended up there who simply00:10:05
wrote columns dedicated to the fact that00:10:07
they have a lot of problems in the region, if we are00:10:10
talking about, for example,00:10:13
the spread of fakes about their own. What kind of00:10:16
property can we talk about here? What kind of00:10:18
property was intended for the00:10:22
distribution of fakes; a computer;00:10:25
Well, let’s say Let00:10:28
’s assume00:10:29
where this computer is located. Will00:10:31
this apartment be sold or00:10:34
not? It’s not clear, it’s not about the money; there’s a00:10:36
phone; a computer. Yes, this actually00:10:38
raises a lot of questions for me: where will00:10:40
this computer be located next? The phone will be00:10:43
given away; how and if00:10:47
such bad actions were committed on it? in00:10:49
relation to the country Is it possible to00:10:51
give it to someone in general, he is also00:10:56
accustomed to being a00:10:59
hypocrite in this matter and first of00:11:02
all You know to us you journalists us00:11:05
your colleagues And when they go to00:11:08
their districts to explain to people00:11:10
why they think that Galkin00:11:13
Makarevich and others you can Sitting in Israel00:11:16
means pouring slop on your country.00:11:19
Let them talk about this and hear what the00:11:21
reaction of society in Tomsk is and why00:11:26
we also express concerns and we are afraid00:11:30
that such a law can be used for the00:11:32
redistribution of property, the taking away of the company's00:11:34
property from entrepreneurs by competitors.00:11:37
Well, that is, this method00:11:39
unfair competition Because,00:11:43
well, how do you prove intent? These are the00:11:47
legal disputes around the00:11:50
confiscation bill, but de Patov00:11:52
has another context around the amendments:00:11:55
retrospective historical confiscation of00:11:57
property - this is certainly an element of00:12:01
Stalin’s Criminal law, then there were a00:12:04
lot of confiscation cases, this is an00:12:07
additional punishment it was then00:12:10
the main one when00:12:17
[music]00:12:19
humanized punishment due to a00:12:21
significantly smaller number of00:12:23
crimes for very serious thefts for00:12:26
certainly state00:12:27
crimes00:12:30
espionage treason00:12:33
such are some of the Naki on the00:12:38
confiscation that takes place, for example, described in the00:12:40
Old Testament, that is, and so to speak,00:12:43
the period of the Babylonian kingdom in of the ancient00:12:46
Jews from the ancient Phoenicians, it is quite00:12:48
possible that confiscation was indeed00:12:51
in ancient Rome, we00:12:53
see it intu in00:12:57
legislation, the public with the enemies of00:12:59
the people took away estates and latifundia, but00:13:03
they could take away the land and simply00:13:05
give it to better00:13:08
hands from a bad owner. Confiscation of property precisely as a00:13:11
form of punishment in the Middle Ages flourished in00:13:15
mainly along the church line Because from the00:13:18
point of view of the secular line at the early00:13:20
stage of feudalism, the feudal lord was not00:13:23
the owner of the land, he was its user and00:13:26
holder, so naturally the Land00:13:29
could be confiscated, in00:13:32
modern language, if the feudal lord00:13:34
violated the terms of the contract; another thing is that of00:13:37
course there were many examples when00:13:40
lawless deprived of Ai Weng the motto of the hero00:13:44
Yes Dedi child knight disinherited00:13:48
destitute in terms of property yes the00:13:50
church put the matter on stream during the00:13:53
notorious heyday of the00:13:56
Inquisition during the Inquisition in the00:13:58
late00:13:59
Middle Ages at the beginning of modern times00:14:02
complete property confiscation will be widely practiced,00:14:04
that is, the family is00:14:07
punished and remains absolutely00:14:11
destitute As for our country and its00:14:14
history, in the Russian Pravda, the first set of00:14:17
laws from the time of Yaroslav the Wise, a00:14:19
type of punishment called00:14:21
flood and plunder is mentioned, it is clear that this is a00:14:24
serious punishment because it is00:14:28
assigned for serious crimes. Well, for00:14:32
example, for arson for horse stealing, at00:14:34
that time this was one of the most serious00:14:36
crimes then there for that means all sorts of,00:14:40
as we would now say, state00:14:42
crimes will begin to be applied, so00:14:45
some00:14:47
legal historians believe that the flow is00:14:51
something that happened to a00:14:55
person’s personal freedom, someone says that this is00:14:58
expulsion, someone says that this is00:15:01
his conversion into slavery But00:15:04
the plunder, apparently, is still00:15:06
the confiscation of property in favor of00:15:09
the state, under which the00:15:12
prince Tsar Ivan the Terrible was then rising, took away the estate from the00:15:16
boyars accused of Treason to00:15:18
the State, that is, their own00:15:20
property oprichnina oprichnina is a00:15:23
tool that00:15:26
was largely based on confiscation because the00:15:29
oprichniki They knew very well that in many00:15:32
cases the property that they00:15:36
take away will be transferred to them as an00:15:38
incentive. Although the guardsmen were of course00:15:41
primarily interested in the rich and00:15:42
noble, but the fact is that the persecution of any00:15:45
rich and noble person meant00:15:48
literally or figuratively the persecution of00:15:51
hundreds of people, otherwise sometimes thousands who00:15:53
depend on it, therefore the oprichnina terror00:15:56
directly or obliquely beat all layers of us00:16:00
in the 10th century, property was actively taken away from the00:16:04
then foreign agents opponents of the tsarist00:16:06
power living abroad forty-00:16:09
eight years a00:16:11
powerful wave of revolutions swept across Europe France00:16:14
German states00:16:16
Austria means Italy Nicholas was00:16:19
extremely worried that Russian00:16:22
subjects who were abroad could00:16:25
personally set a bad example, so to speak,00:16:27
and it was ordered that00:16:30
everyone was really ordered to return. Except for those00:16:33
who were sent abroad there on00:16:35
behalf of the state itself. Well, of course,00:16:38
diplomatic and all sorts of other00:16:39
representatives, Gerson refused to00:16:41
do this; he had quite extensive00:16:44
property in Moscow, two houses were sold, the00:16:48
money was deposited in the court's cash register.00:16:50
Well, a version of a bank. And this money00:16:54
was subject to confiscation by decree. This is just00:16:57
one of the examples. Apparently there are very00:17:00
few when this money was00:17:02
obtained thanks to his personal00:17:04
acquaintance with the banker Rothschild, which means00:17:07
Herzen sold his securities to00:17:10
Rothschild, and he, as if on his own,00:17:13
demanded money from the Russian Empire. The00:17:18
fact is that his banking house was a00:17:21
very important intermediary for the Russian Empire in00:17:24
a number of, so to speak,00:17:28
large financial projects, let’s say, in00:17:31
the end, by order of the emperor,00:17:34
Rothschild was paid everything including00:17:37
interest and even interest on00:17:41
interest Golden age of confiscation00:17:43
revolution of the seventeenth year, the state00:17:46
not only nationalizes all00:17:47
enterprises, private property like00:17:50
houses and apartments becomes public00:17:52
rob the loot expropriation00:17:56
expro for educated people, but then00:17:59
little by little the state gets together and00:18:03
somehow institutes this type of punishment and so00:18:06
see00:18:08
According to the resolution of the Central Election Commission of June00:18:11
twenty-seven, confiscation can00:18:14
only be applied for00:18:16
state military official and00:18:19
economic crimes, that is, let’s00:18:21
say for theft, robbery, robbery,00:18:25
classical criminal offenses,00:18:27
confiscation of property,00:18:29
the logic of that time does not apply, a person who00:18:32
has simply committed a criminal offense without any00:18:34
political overtones,00:18:36
he is of course bad, but it is00:18:40
Possibly bad because it is a remnant of00:18:43
capitalism because there yes But an00:18:46
official crime is committed by an enemy, a00:18:49
state crime is committed by an00:18:52
enemy, a military crime is committed by an00:18:54
enemy during the repression of the00:18:57
years of judicial leaders to be sentenced to00:19:00
death with the confiscation of all personally00:19:02
owned property, this00:19:05
is accompanied by shadow confiscation, the00:19:07
families of the repressed are evicted from the00:19:10
apartments, some are fighting for the return of00:19:12
living space, we still talked about these people00:19:15
in the special editorial office. But even00:19:18
after the liberalization of Soviet00:19:19
criminal legislation, the Criminal00:19:22
Code of the year, republican codes Renault,00:19:29
confiscation means they apply confiscation00:19:34
according to Soviet criminal law, this is an00:19:36
additional measure of punishment. That is,00:19:38
it can only be assigned along with00:19:40
one of the00:19:42
main high-profile confiscations of the late00:19:45
Soviet era, cases of economic00:19:47
crimes of the seventies and eighties,00:19:49
from store directors, officials,00:19:52
bribe-takers,00:19:54
shocking citizens, amounts of money and valuables were confiscated00:19:58
in one of the cases, even the son-in-law of Secretary00:20:00
General Brezhnev was imprisoned for the Minister of Internal Affairs, Yuri00:20:02
Churbanov, confiscated from him in in particular, the00:20:05
donated skullcap and robe he was convicted00:20:08
of in the so-called cotton case; his00:20:11
defendants included thousands more people00:20:13
who made a fortune from fraud with00:20:15
cotton with the white gold of Uzbekistan.00:20:18
Uzbekistan at that time was the main00:20:19
producer of cotton; the importance of cotton in00:20:22
general for the USSR was that it was00:20:24
used not only in textile00:20:25
industry but also for the production of00:20:28
smokeless gunpowder back in the00:20:30
fifties and sixties, gunpowder was00:20:32
widely used not only for small00:20:34
arms cartridges and00:20:36
artillery ammunition. Well, as the00:20:38
main component of fuel for00:20:44
rockets, and now the Rocket00:20:48
Age has just arrived, state requests for its00:20:50
production are increasing00:20:52
incredibly, I fully admit that the00:20:55
leaders of the investigative group, or00:20:56
maybe someone from higher00:20:59
management had an assumption that00:21:02
in order to show the scale, what00:21:06
is called a Star Defendant is needed, that the00:21:08
son-in-law of the already deceased Brezhnev, Yuri00:21:10
Churbanov, turned out to be such a Star00:21:13
Figure because he himself00:21:16
had no history of cotton fraud nothing but bribes according to the00:21:19
investigation, yes Well, apparently00:21:21
he really00:21:23
did receive some gifts in quotes, but that is, he had00:21:28
a touch in this matter, but such a00:21:31
decision was quite peripherally significant.00:21:34
I remember very well, I was then a00:21:37
beginning student lawyer,00:21:40
I remember very well how that Churbanov was00:21:43
ultimately not00:21:45
shot, made an incredible00:21:47
impression in the new Russia, the article of00:21:49
confiscation was treated with suspicion00:21:52
precisely because of its reputation from Stalin’s00:21:54
times and was rarely used in 2003, it was generally00:21:58
abolished later, it was returned, but until recent00:22:01
years it was not widely heard, that is, in addition to00:22:03
imprisonment, in addition to a fine or other00:22:07
punishment that sounded in the00:22:09
court verdict as an additional punishment,00:22:12
confiscation of property could be applied, this is00:22:15
exactly how it sounded in the law, a measure of a00:22:17
criminal legal nature00:22:18
implies00:22:20
that the nature of the origin of this00:22:24
property must be00:22:26
accessible to the prosecution and on this basis the court00:22:31
applies a decision on00:22:33
confiscation of property this is 104 Note of the UKRF,00:22:37
it is applied to a large number of00:22:40
articles for a large00:22:42
number of sections of the Criminal00:22:46
Code, this is everything from relatively speaking00:22:48
from 105 to special00:22:52
articles 36100:22:56
32700:22:59
number of various crimes of a00:23:02
large00:23:04
amount of property that is reflected in00:23:06
this article That is, these are00:23:08
funds and property received in during the00:23:10
commission of a crime,00:23:12
funds used and00:23:15
intended for the financing00:23:17
of terrorism, extremist activities, please00:23:19
note that these are00:23:22
approximately the amendments that we are00:23:24
talking about now, but we already have them in a00:23:28
formed form in the Criminal Code00:23:29
from the most high-profile stories of recent00:23:32
times And this is confiscation of property00:23:35
Colonel00:23:37
Zakharchenko Remember there was a colonel of00:23:39
the Ministry of Internal Affairs who was involved there, but the00:23:42
biggest scandal was connected with the fact that a large amount of cash was00:23:44
found in his relative’s apartment00:23:46
and then there00:23:48
was a story of confiscation connected00:23:51
with the ex-head of the Serpukhov region00:23:54
Alexander Shestun, the vest was taken away according to the00:23:57
report Which means for00:24:01
2014-2018, but it turns out that over the00:24:05
last 20 years, not from the fourteenth to the00:24:08
eighteenth, but over the last 20 years, and in00:24:11
total,00:24:14
property and money worth $70 billion were confiscated in the United States,00:24:17
again in pieces, everything looks00:24:20
a little different speech It seems that a year00:24:22
there is about a little more than00:24:24
40,000 confiscations, in 60% of cases00:24:29
weapons are confiscated or there is a snatch or00:24:33
something similar, in 19% of cases00:24:38
money is confiscated and in 7%00:24:42
of cases cars are confiscated, such a00:24:45
classic case for which there is a00:24:47
big the number of complaints in the USA is00:24:49
when And for drug-related crimes, a00:24:52
car is confiscated00:24:55
if drugs were transported in the car,00:24:57
if we take examples that are close to00:25:00
us Yes, for example, sanctions were introduced against00:25:03
Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch,00:25:05
and Deripaska00:25:09
tried to circumvent these sanctions In the end00:25:11
against him, the American Ministry of Justice00:25:13
opened a criminal case and, as part of00:25:15
this opened case, American00:25:17
news is now trying to seize, firstly, the00:25:21
balances of funds in the accounts00:25:22
that were used to circumvent00:25:24
sanctions, plus three of Deripaska’s real estate properties, and00:25:30
secondly, most likely, a key00:25:32
consideration of the new00:25:34
confiscation bill in the Duma scheduled for00:25:36
next Wednesday, the amendments are supported by the00:25:39
government, approved by the overwhelming00:25:41
majority in parliament, which means that with a00:25:43
high probability they will soon00:25:45
gain the force of law, with the understanding that the00:25:48
law will be adopted in three readings, taking00:25:50
into account the number of the00:25:53
majority,00:25:54
we are amending00:25:56
one of them, it concerns the fact that00:26:00
the defendant may request a00:26:03
jury to consider the case. Yes, what is00:26:06
such a public discussion after all? It00:26:08
gives a person more chances, in principle,00:26:11
sometimes to justify himself and prove00:26:14
his00:26:15
innocence. We have made another amendment00:26:18
that excludes the possibility of withdrawing00:26:21
shares from the00:26:26
property. Well, it may offend few people. Yes there is00:26:30
this story with shares but in fact, for00:26:32
example, if something is bought with00:26:35
money that supposedly someone was given00:26:37
shares, in general they also get twisted.00:26:39
Therefore, such an amendment was made and Well,00:26:43
let's see the likelihood that they will be accepted,00:26:45
it is very minimal, but it is also our00:26:50
attempt Correct what exists, but it seems to00:26:53
us that00:26:55
this law will still be applied in00:26:58
exceptional cases. Why Because there00:27:00
is a clear note about self-interest00:27:02
But this self-interest will have to be00:27:05
somehow proven to law enforcement officers00:27:06
And self-interest can manifest itself in00:27:10
the form of00:27:11
receiving specific financial fees there.00:27:14
And if this was not the case, then it is00:27:16
clear that there is no self-interest and then00:27:20
tie it to the person who is00:27:22
accused of selfish actions and then deprive him.00:27:25
After all this,00:27:29
here you can talk about the risk group about00:27:32
everyone who can commit a crime, but00:27:36
here Again, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the00:27:39
list of00:27:40
proposed changes, the list of00:27:43
proposed articles of the Criminal Code,00:27:46
it is quite extensive, therefore it00:27:48
only speaks about journalists about migrants00:27:51
on00:27:56
my charge against a person. And in the future, the00:27:59
main case will be suspended but00:28:01
the arrest will not be lifted; this is00:28:04
possible. For assessment for that including00:28:08
carrying out some kind of linguistic00:28:09
examination of the statements, if00:28:11
we are talking about the dissemination of00:28:13
fakes, it may take a long00:28:16
time, but the arrest on the property will not be00:28:19
lifted; the arrest on the property will00:28:21
remain. What prevents its00:28:23
further disposal, that is, it cannot be00:28:25
said that this is some kind of then the00:28:27
punitive novella is in law These are most00:28:31
likely natural changes after the00:28:34
appearance of new articles Thank you for this00:28:38
bill to all of us together, and maybe00:28:41
somewhere in quotation marks we should say exactly00:28:43
these characters Unfortunately, this list is00:28:45
clear that it is not for a thousand and thousands of00:28:48
people Yes, but for several hundred are listed00:28:51
you understand perfectly well I you understand I’m00:28:54
not against opinions I’m not here advocating00:28:57
some kind of doctrine of dictatorship yes that is, I00:28:59
think that opinion Maybe but people00:29:01
have to answer for opinions in general people do00:29:03
n’t react to it clearly the other way around Well that00:29:06
is Even those who00:29:08
very patriotic, not everyone sees00:29:12
it in general, it is necessary to say listen Well,00:29:14
we already have enough00:29:16
articles and measures in the Criminal Code, why else and here’s how it00:29:19
will be applied When, including the00:29:21
end of the special military operation, is an00:29:23
open question That is, now00:29:26
we have This is the position of our colleagues. What00:29:29
will they say next when he is00:29:30
dest? We will repeal all the laws that were00:29:55
passed on [music]Description:
18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ПИВОВАРОВЫМ АЛЕКСЕЕМ ВЛАДИМИРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ПИВОВАРОВА АЛЕКСЕЯ ВЛАДИМИРОВИЧА За фейки и дискредитацию армии собираются изымать имущество — Госдума уже приняла соответствующий законопроект в первом чтении. Само по себе это наказание не ново — его регулярно применяли в античности, Средневековье и в СССР, в том числе в эпоху репрессий. Применяется оно (правда, по другим поводам) и в США. В новой России эту меру исключили из Уголовного кодекса, но затем она вернулось. Как это теперь будет работать и какие прецеденты создает? Разбирались в новом выпуске «Редакции. Контекст» 0:00 Госдума приняла в первом чтении законопроект о конфискации имущества за фейки 1:17 Депутат Луговой: «Любой, кто попытается нанести ущерб Родине, лишится всего и подохнет ... как последняя собака» 2:29 Мнения «за» и «против» закона 5:43 За что именно будут наказывать конфискацией? 8:00 Закон противоречит Конституции? 10:43 О размытости формулировок в законопроекте 13:19 Конфискация имущества как элемент сталинского уголовного права 14:06 Конфискация в Ветхом Завете и Древнем Риме 14:43 Конфискация в Средневековье. Инквизиция 15:45 Как применялась конфискация в Древней Руси 16:46 Опричнина 17:33 Как банкир Ротшильд помог Александру Герцену спасти деньги от конфискации 19:14 «Золотой век» конфискации 21:16 «Хлопковое дело» 23:21 Конфискация в новой России 25:30 Как применяется конфискация в США 27:00 Какие поправки предложили перед вторым чтением 28:25 Как могут применять новый закон о конфискации Телеграм-канал Ксении Горячевой: https://t.me/DeputatGoryacheva Поддержать «Редакцию»: 💰 из России — через сервис Boosty: https://boosty.to/redakciya 💰 из-за рубежа — через функцию «Спонсорство» в YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1eFXmJNkjITxPFWTy6RsWg/join 👉 Мерч «Редакции» на «Мам, купи!»: https://mamcupy.com/catalog/redaktsiya/ 👉 Мерч «Редакции» на Ozon: https://www.ozon.ru/highlight/skidka-1-ot-mam-kupi-1245701 👉 Мерч «Редакции» на Wildberries: https://www.wildberries.ru/brands/mam-kupi Подписывайтесь на наши социальные сети: Телеграм-канал «Редакции»: https://t.me/redakciya_channel «Редакция» в «Дзене»: https://dzen.ru/redakciya «Редакция» в «ВК»: https://vk.com/redakciya_pivovarova Твиттер Алексея Пивоварова: https://twitter.com/pivo_varov Канал «Редакции» в вайбере: https://vb.me/redakcia_yt «Редакция» в «Одноклассниках»: https://ok.ru/redakciya Сотрудничество и идеи: [email protected] По вопросам рекламы: [email protected]
Preparing download options
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст" video?
http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "Как работает изъятие имущества / Редакция. Контекст"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.