background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових"

input logo icon
Video tags
|

Video tags

прямий
прямий ютьюб
прямий youtube
прямий канал украина
прямий канал ютуб
2022
тероборона
війна
війна україна
війна в україні
война
зсу
збройні сили
збройні сили україни
наступ на україну
росія
вторгненя росії
наступ росії
армія україни
армія
воєнний стан
путин
україна
київ
путін
россия
новости
новини
щойно
киев
Курбанова
live
stream
стрім
Залужний
Зеленський
контрнаступ
ЗСУ
ВСУ
Ермак
ОП
Єрмак
Херсон
Фейгін
Фейгин
Арестович
мобилизация
илларионов
ілларіонов
іларіонов
всу
курбанова_live
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:14
[music]
00:00:29
[music]
00:00:49
friends Good evening Hello, I
00:00:51
sound happy to everyone Greetings
00:00:53
to two YouTube channels at once, friends Thank you
00:00:55
for being with us, I greet all our
00:00:57
audience of the Kurbanova Life YouTube channel,
00:00:59
friends, don’t forget about it doesn’t matter if you
00:01:00
stay and subscribe during
00:01:03
the stream or after it After the end, you will
00:01:05
now be able to watch us live Or be sure to
00:01:08
record later Don’t forget
00:01:09
to join our information
00:01:11
team And of course I greet each
00:01:13
and everyone who watches us on the YouTube
00:01:14
channel direct Thank you very much friends for
00:01:16
being you and I also encourage you to
00:01:19
stay and
00:01:20
subscribe to Youtube channel, friends,
00:01:22
remember that without you, without your support,
00:01:24
we are unable to disseminate our information, this is how
00:01:27
YouTube algorithms work, that
00:01:29
without your like we will not fly across the
00:01:31
expanses of YouTube, so I kindly
00:01:33
ask you today, do not forget while you are
00:01:35
watching us. I know that the audience is going to be
00:01:37
very large, especially for today's
00:01:38
guest, so don't forget
00:01:41
to leave us a like and I'm waiting for
00:01:42
each and every one in the comments Write
00:01:45
Where are you from Where are you watching us Are
00:01:47
you now in all Ukrainian
00:01:50
regions Do you live abroad On
00:01:52
what continent do you
00:01:54
live now because I see how
00:01:56
our audience is growing, I see how
00:01:58
the geography makes a difference, there are places
00:02:00
where you don’t even believe it. Wow, people
00:02:02
watch us there too. Therefore, friends, of course, I
00:02:04
will read with great pleasure
00:02:06
everything you write and I remind you that everything
00:02:09
we do, we do in order to
00:02:10
unite around the most cool the most
00:02:12
important most necessary team we are currently
00:02:16
envied in a kind way by everyone because we
00:02:19
have such an army Let's thank it
00:02:21
Let's support the QR code that is
00:02:23
always with us, it encourages you to
00:02:25
pay attention to it and using
00:02:28
your mobile phone easily and
00:02:30
quickly go to the official account of the
00:02:32
Armed Forces of Ukraine National
00:02:33
Bank remember Wherever you are, you
00:02:36
can safely
00:02:38
send money to the Armed Forces of
00:02:41
Ukraine from any side, but today we will
00:02:44
talk about complex things and what
00:02:46
the West argues about among themselves as the leaders of
00:02:49
Ukraine see it will it be the Russia of the future
00:02:52
will it exist at all not only of course the
00:02:54
most important events for this day by
00:02:56
this hour We will discuss with senior
00:02:58
researchers at the Center for
00:03:00
Security Policy in Washington I have great
00:03:02
pleasure in inviting
00:03:04
Andrei Larionov to the conversation Mr. Larionov
00:03:06
Good evening Good evening
00:03:09
Larionov Let us start with The topic of
00:03:13
the news that came to us
00:03:15
last week It says that the
00:03:17
Western press, at least one of the
00:03:20
political publications, recognized the President of
00:03:23
the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin as a
00:03:25
murderer and the loser of the year. I
00:03:28
always make a postscript on my own that the war,
00:03:30
Unfortunately, is not lost yet Russian
00:03:33
the economy is not yet in ruins. The Russian
00:03:35
army, unfortunately, is still on the territory of
00:03:36
Ukraine. So, do you agree or are you
00:03:39
ready to argue that Putin is the
00:03:41
loser of the year?
00:03:43
Before answering your question, I
00:03:46
would like to ask you a question. Please tell me,
00:03:48
you don’t like Ukraine.
00:03:51
I adore it, it’s mine. the country is
00:03:54
new, act against it Of course not,
00:03:58
but I hope not, but with your
00:04:00
actions and repent with your words, and
00:04:04
in discussions you are working against
00:04:07
Ukraine, I wanted to understand why you
00:04:10
are doing this
00:04:11
Larionov, please explain, Because
00:04:13
before I defend myself, I must know
00:04:15
what you are accusing me of.
00:04:17
they wrote at least so it comes on
00:04:20
your behalf that you first made it
00:04:24
possible for the enemies of Ukraine to speak on the air on your
00:04:27
channel and said yes, that’s
00:04:31
completely normal, the enemies of Ukraine have the
00:04:33
right to speak on your channel on your
00:04:35
channel,
00:04:38
I wrote about the enemies of Ukraine who
00:04:41
have the right to speak on our channel Well,
00:04:44
no, it seems to me that the enemies of Ukraine
00:04:47
should not speak on our channels.
00:04:50
But just a few days
00:04:53
ago, during that broadcast, which
00:04:56
unfortunately we did not take place in full
00:04:57
format
00:04:58
as it was supposed to take place, apparently did not
00:05:01
take place due to a hacker attack
00:05:04
that did not allowed us to talk.
00:05:07
In your comments to this material there
00:05:12
were quite a lot of statements about the
00:05:14
enemies of Ukraine whom you allow on
00:05:17
your air and you called
00:05:20
yes, this is normal, absolutely everyone has the
00:05:23
right to speak out and we give the right
00:05:26
to speak out to all enemies of Ukraine, the
00:05:31
story is that very many in
00:05:34
the comments they really
00:05:35
say what we like or are these
00:05:38
guests, don’t invite them, don’t invite them. I
00:05:40
said that our platform is our channel,
00:05:43
when we call, we call a variety of people
00:05:45
and the enemies of Ukraine will definitely not
00:05:48
appear here. But even if our audience
00:05:51
thinks that these people are not we must be
00:05:53
heard precisely for freedom of speech for
00:05:55
democracy so that different people are
00:05:57
represented on our broadcast like this,
00:06:00
this was said
00:06:01
Yes, but this means that you think
00:06:04
it is possible that the enemies of Ukraine can
00:06:05
take part in the broadcasts of your channel
00:06:09
and see the question question but already the
00:06:14
corresponding person was indicated there says
00:06:15
Ukraine on What he said Everyone has the right
00:06:19
to express this you have now repeated
00:06:21
this point of view right here I
00:06:24
will not argue about what was
00:06:25
said a few days ago Because I cannot
00:06:27
repeat verbatim the words that were said
00:06:30
then I will say it again I repeat that I
00:06:32
assume that my audience may
00:06:35
have different views. If you are now in
00:06:37
the comments, they can write why you
00:06:39
called. And I will say that if I called, then
00:06:41
I consider my guest the right important
00:06:44
important and interesting and the enemies will never
00:06:47
get in. On the contrary, I am calling my own here
00:06:50
guests so that there are different opinions with
00:06:53
different views, and so on,
00:06:55
then a direct question for you because you
00:06:58
responded to the corresponding remark,
00:07:00
they answered, and when they wrote to you
00:07:02
that why are you calling such an enemy of
00:07:04
Ukraine as Andrei Larionov, in particular
00:07:06
the one who is now in front of you,
00:07:08
you and there in detail told which enemy of
00:07:12
Ukraine is the answer And that Sweden is not the same
00:07:14
question mark These are your words this is
00:07:16
not the opinion of your commentators
00:07:17
Accordingly, with these words you
00:07:20
allowed yourself to equate the real
00:07:22
enemy of Ukraine
00:07:25
Mr. Shvets with a person who is a
00:07:28
friend of Ukraine who for many
00:07:31
years has been doing completely incomparable
00:07:34
Defense on all issues Ukraine, thus
00:07:37
you not only supported the position about those
00:07:41
either illiterate people or
00:07:43
ignorant people or really
00:07:45
enemies of Ukraine and bots who carry out the
00:07:48
task of the KGB FSB of the Kremlin to undermine
00:07:52
supporters of friends of Ukraine, but you
00:07:55
authorized with them and, moreover, you
00:07:57
tried to equate your friends,
00:08:00
friends of the country
00:08:02
with the enemies of Ukraine thus, objectively
00:08:06
speaking, you acted in the interests of the enemies of
00:08:08
Ukraine, why did you do this?
00:08:10
You know that we invited you
00:08:13
because we want to hear from you about Mr.
00:08:15
Swiss, something was written in
00:08:17
the comments, I don’t know him, in
00:08:20
principle, I can’t talk about him at
00:08:22
all Because I am not a viewer of
00:08:24
his blog, I don’t follow what he
00:08:26
says, but he is a really
00:08:27
popular person in the YouTube segment,
00:08:29
so you are now asking me that I
00:08:31
was responsible for the comment
00:08:33
that I read in a row. That is, you
00:08:36
must understand that we did not invite you
00:08:38
in order to offend you If you were an
00:08:40
enemy, in principle you were not invited because
00:08:42
it simply contradicts logic
00:08:45
because this is my time this is the time of my
00:08:47
audience We have been waiting for you and I don’t
00:08:50
understand why you want to figure out
00:08:51
what doesn’t make sense if you think
00:08:54
that we invited you because if we want to
00:08:56
offend you Well, there is no point in this,
00:08:57
why should we do this, but I won’t,
00:09:00
I don’t mean who to invite and for
00:09:04
what purposes I apologize, I’ll allow you to
00:09:07
answer
00:09:11
in this case, with your comment you
00:09:13
allowed yourself to equate those people who
00:09:16
help Ukraine Who does everything possible
00:09:18
In order to help with those who are doing
00:09:21
the maximum possible to harm
00:09:23
Ukraine, I’m not talking about an invitation to
00:09:25
broadcast, I’m now talking about your specific
00:09:27
comment with which you, firstly, yourself
00:09:30
showed your attitude, and secondly, further
00:09:32
an example of how from your point of view,
00:09:35
it is possible for your viewers and listeners to
00:09:37
treat you as friends of Ukraine
00:09:39
instead of explaining to your
00:09:43
viewers and listeners who made
00:09:45
a mistake or who make mistakes
00:09:48
intentionally or not intentionally, you thereby
00:09:51
ask that this is how it can and
00:09:55
should be done to act in this
00:09:57
way objectively, regardless of your
00:09:59
desire, regardless of whether you invited you did
00:10:01
not invite you invite
00:10:04
your other viewers to act
00:10:06
in this way, I would like to draw your
00:10:08
attention and also to your viewers and
00:10:10
listeners and also to any other
00:10:12
journalists who are trying to
00:10:14
act in this way, that by such
00:10:16
actions you cause damage first
00:10:18
of all your own country to your
00:10:20
own people, sooner or later
00:10:23
such actions can lead to the fact that
00:10:24
your friends will refuse will be forced to
00:10:28
refuse this help this does not
00:10:30
concern me Because this is my
00:10:31
fundamental choice But other people
00:10:33
may turn out to be much more
00:10:34
thin-skinned and can really
00:10:37
accept for themselves other decisions
00:10:39
were made on this let's finish I drew your
00:10:42
attention and drew the attention of our
00:10:43
viewers and listeners to the inadmissibility of
00:10:46
such actions and accordingly
00:10:47
I urge you and also your colleagues to
00:10:50
stop and suppress such attempts
00:10:53
at the very beginning so that
00:10:56
people try You must including
00:10:58
helping them explain who is a friend
00:11:01
and who is an enemy,
00:11:04
I am my audience Larionov, as you
00:11:07
are doing to me now, although I am not
00:11:10
your marriage and it seems to me that you are
00:11:12
not guilty of anything, I always tell my
00:11:14
audience that I am giving them information,
00:11:17
now is the opportunity hear you and
00:11:19
leave three points, everyone makes their
00:11:21
own choice, everyone draws their own conclusions
00:11:23
because a person is responsible for
00:11:25
himself, for his life, for his conclusions, that’s
00:11:27
all, and you want to impose some
00:11:30
point on them. It won’t work, we don’t want a
00:11:33
point
00:11:39
from the point of view of
00:11:46
I can speak Yes Please Thank you with
00:11:49
your statement equating the enemy of
00:11:52
Ukraine with a disinformer And an employee of the KGB
00:11:55
FSB who
00:11:58
has been working against Ukraine for many decades participated in not a
00:12:01
single operation to undermine the security of the
00:12:04
sovereignty of the independence of Ukraine and
00:12:06
a number of people equating the friends
00:12:10
of Ukraine with these enemies, you are thereby
00:12:12
acting on the benefit of the enemies of Ukraine and
00:12:16
therefore I simply draw your attention
00:12:17
also to the attention of all other viewers and
00:12:20
listeners who write relevant
00:12:22
comments that in this way these people,
00:12:24
if these people act not consciously
00:12:26
without understanding what they are doing, they are acting
00:12:29
against Ukraine I am not talking about those bots
00:12:31
and those big trolls who launch,
00:12:35
including in the comments to your
00:12:37
channel, as well as to many other channels,
00:12:39
and their task at work is this I
00:12:41
now draw attention to, I draw the
00:12:43
attention of those people who do not understand this. It
00:12:45
seemed to me that you were like an experienced, smart And
00:12:49
talented journalist who does not write
00:12:53
first day, your program is able to
00:12:56
distinguish friends from enemies. Judging by the
00:12:59
comment that was made, you are
00:13:01
not always able to do this. Therefore, I am making
00:13:04
my small contribution to
00:13:05
help you and your
00:13:07
fellow friends, too, so that you do
00:13:09
n’t make such mistakes again because this
00:13:11
weakens Ukraine and the program of
00:13:13
Ukraine
00:13:15
Larionov helps. It seems to me that for a person
00:13:18
who was not even on our stream,
00:13:20
was not on our channel even once, we spent
00:13:23
invaluable 10 minutes, it seems to me, because
00:13:25
it’s both your and my time. Well, okay,
00:13:28
let’s assume that this is my experience of some kind
00:13:30
this is your recommendation I’m very sorry,
00:13:32
I’m very sorry that I want people to
00:13:33
hear your analytics and the analytics of the
00:13:36
comment. It seems to me that this is
00:13:38
important and this is necessary, and it seems to me that you
00:13:41
have something to say when you say that
00:13:43
you are a friend of Ukraine. Let’s then
00:13:44
talk about what - support for
00:13:47
our country is the most important thing today; the
00:13:49
information war is going on and continues.
00:13:51
Well, of course, we are all
00:13:53
participants in it. What was said
00:13:55
is one of the most valuable because
00:13:57
for a large number of your viewers and
00:14:01
listeners, as well as for citizens
00:14:02
of Ukraine, it is important to help them understand who is a
00:14:05
friend and who is an enemy, and in this sense, I
00:14:08
am doing my job, you are doing your job. But
00:14:10
in this matter, it would be extremely wrong
00:14:12
if you or your colleagues helped the
00:14:15
enemies of Ukraine, let’s move on to
00:14:17
your question again.
00:14:19
You were interested in whether you agree
00:14:23
I am with the assessment that Putin is the
00:14:24
loser of the year No, I don’t agree with this
00:14:27
I don’t consider him a loser, a
00:14:29
loser, I consider him a criminal,
00:14:31
a criminal who has been waging a
00:14:34
bloody war against Ukraine for almost 9 years,
00:14:37
as a result of which
00:14:40
tens if not hundreds of thousands of
00:14:43
people have died in In Ukraine, and before that, people died,
00:14:45
and in Georgia, in Syria, and on
00:14:50
Russian territory in Chechnya, according to various estimates,
00:14:54
up to 600 thousand people died. For the death of all these
00:14:58
people, Putin is primarily responsible, who
00:15:00
has unleashed more than
00:15:02
one war and continues to wage wars,
00:15:06
including Now the most important thing The
00:15:08
worst thing The most disgusting vile
00:15:10
war against Ukraine I will consider that it
00:15:15
became the success of Ukraine will be the Victory of
00:15:18
Ukraine the complete liberation of the entire
00:15:22
territory of Ukraine from the occupiers
00:15:24
the restoration of the territorial
00:15:26
integrity of Ukraine the return of all people
00:15:29
captured and found themselves in captivity or in
00:15:33
occupied territory who
00:15:34
were captured by the occupiers payment of all
00:15:38
reparations for the restoration of Ukraine and
00:15:41
also the creation of conditions for
00:15:43
security guarantees so that from the territory of Russia
00:15:47
under Putin, without Putin, after Putin, no
00:15:53
new war would ever be unleashed, not against Ukraine, not about not
00:15:56
against one other neighbor. When
00:15:59
this happens, I will consider it
00:16:01
Ukraine’s luck. the success of Ukraine has
00:16:03
not yet happened, for this we must
00:16:05
fight for this, we must fight, and for this we
00:16:10
still need to do a lot, we,
00:16:12
unfortunately, are still far from the
00:16:14
state that is described by these
00:16:17
conditions
00:16:19
Larionov just last week,
00:16:22
probably Manuel Macron spoke about
00:16:23
security guarantees for the Russian
00:16:25
Federation but he meant his own
00:16:27
indicators, of course, not the way they
00:16:30
immediately began to interpret it in Ukraine.
00:16:32
Because after all, France and Macron to a greater
00:16:34
extent. I think they are on the
00:16:35
side of Ukraine, but here they started
00:16:36
joking. What, but why not let go this
00:16:38
will be the Budapest memorandum for the
00:16:41
Russian Federation When you talk about the
00:16:44
guarantee that it will never
00:16:45
happen again and Russia will not be able to attack,
00:16:47
what kind of guarantees are these, who will
00:16:48
sign them and how can this be done if
00:16:50
it remains a nuclear country,
00:16:53
you know, I don’t understand what a
00:16:56
security guarantee is for today's Russia,
00:16:57
especially What exactly does Mr.
00:17:00
Macron mean? But all these things that you just
00:17:04
mentioned, nuclear weapons, we understand
00:17:07
here mean it may make sense to
00:17:10
pay attention. What the point is is
00:17:13
that the very fact of Russia’s attack on Ukraine
00:17:17
and, accordingly, the result of this
00:17:19
attack was death at least
00:17:21
apparently there are now close to 100 thousand
00:17:24
Russian military personnel and,
00:17:27
accordingly, this is a colossal blow and
00:17:29
damage directly to Russian
00:17:31
citizens. I’m not even talking about the wounded,
00:17:34
the maimed, and so on. That is, this is
00:17:36
huge damage now we are talking about
00:17:38
Russia and was caused as a result of the attacks
00:17:41
that Putin carried out against Ukraine,
00:17:44
respectively, Russian
00:17:46
citizens died when Putin attacked both
00:17:48
Syria and Georgia and carried out
00:17:52
operations in Chechnya, the question arises: What
00:17:54
made these attacks possible,
00:17:58
these attacks were possible, it was a matter of the feeling of
00:18:01
impunity of the
00:18:02
impunity of the aggressor, where did
00:18:05
the feeling of impunity come from, this
00:18:07
feeling of impunity arose from the
00:18:10
possession of nuclear weapons and therefore, a
00:18:12
serious conversation about
00:18:15
security guarantees for Russian citizens and
00:18:18
for Russia should apparently include
00:18:20
the question of what to do with nuclear
00:18:23
weapons in the Russian Federation
00:18:25
because we see that the presence of nuclear weapons
00:18:28
in the Russian Federation is a direct
00:18:30
threat to the Russian Federation and a direct
00:18:33
threat to Russian citizens because that
00:18:35
it is the presence of these weapons that leads to the deaths of
00:18:38
tens and hundreds of thousands of Russian
00:18:40
citizens and therefore it is obvious for Mr.
00:18:42
Macron and for other citizens and leaders of
00:18:46
Western states who today or
00:18:48
tomorrow will be ready to discuss guarantees that are
00:18:50
safe for Russia. One of the elements of
00:18:53
this package should be a discussion of what to
00:18:56
do with nuclear weapons that They
00:18:58
are at the disposal of the Russian
00:19:01
Federation,
00:19:04
if I’m not mistaken Mr. Larionov,
00:19:06
there are no such conversations anywhere near, moreover,
00:19:08
you know very well that almost until the
00:19:11
last month the whole world, one way or another,
00:19:13
took Putin’s threats absolutely
00:19:16
seriously; today
00:19:18
we already have
00:19:19
this is separately the German Chancellor
00:19:21
Scholz, the United States of America, which
00:19:24
makes very harsh statements, but before
00:19:26
that it was taken seriously and
00:19:28
imagine, even with a change of power in the
00:19:31
Russian Federation, that someone would
00:19:33
give up the nuclear Arsenal. You
00:19:35
can really describe. You were
00:19:37
just recently in a Polish apple tree you had
00:19:39
the Congress of People's Deputies, because there too.
00:19:42
You have representatives
00:19:43
with different views, someone says
00:19:46
that this should be today's Russia,
00:19:47
but without Putin, someone says that it
00:19:49
should be different outlines of this
00:19:51
state, perhaps fewer territories,
00:19:53
but how do you imagine Can you imagine the next
00:19:55
ruler who renounces
00:19:58
Russia's nuclear arsenal? Now we
00:20:01
were talking about Mr. Macron, we
00:20:03
are approaching him, and indeed I cannot
00:20:05
say that I know the details of what
00:20:07
proposals he makes and what he is
00:20:09
discussing. But since you are talking about the fact
00:20:12
that Mr. Macron was worried about
00:20:14
the possibility of using
00:20:16
Putin's nuclear weapons, accordingly, now we are
00:20:18
talking not only about security guarantees
00:20:21
for Russia and for Russian citizens
00:20:23
who, if Putin commits
00:20:25
such actions, are really
00:20:28
[music]
00:20:29
part of the victims of this use, but other
00:20:33
possible victims are those
00:20:35
against whom these weapons can be
00:20:37
directed then there is, accordingly, we are
00:20:39
talking about security guarantees for Europe
00:20:41
for the world now, not only about
00:20:44
Ukraine, so the very fact of the
00:20:47
presence of nuclear weapons in the hands of the owner of
00:20:50
the Kremlin speaks
00:20:57
citizens
00:21:00
about the Russian Federation, European
00:21:02
countries around the world, the general world
00:21:05
of security, accordingly, in the interests of the
00:21:08
international community, make a
00:21:11
decision about what to do with nuclear
00:21:13
weapons, which the
00:21:16
owner of the Kremlin and the
00:21:20
leadership of the Russian Federation now possess for one reason or another, this
00:21:22
question is now not only and not
00:21:24
so much a question Ukraine, this is an
00:21:27
issue not only for the immediate
00:21:29
neighbors of the Russian Federation, this
00:21:31
is an issue for Russia and the
00:21:33
surrounding world, compliance. This
00:21:36
issue must be resolved. This issue,
00:21:37
naturally, can be resolved not only
00:21:41
in the apple tree, not only by the Congress of People's
00:21:44
Deputies; in order to resolve this
00:21:47
issue, it is necessary to involve the participation of
00:21:49
many people
00:21:50
by force On both sides, an important role in this is played by the
00:21:54
armed forces of Ukraine,
00:21:57
as well as
00:21:59
Western countries, as well as the entire
00:22:01
international community, we do not think
00:22:03
that this issue can be resolved today
00:22:05
or tomorrow, but sooner or later this issue
00:22:07
must be resolved, I
00:22:09
don’t know. Well then, once again
00:22:11
I will use the words that were
00:22:13
spoken by macron it’s just that they are like a red
00:22:15
line, not about macron, but the idea itself is to
00:22:18
save the face of the Russian Federation, you
00:22:20
know, I think that for us in Ukraine this
00:22:22
is perceived as extremely painful. Well,
00:22:24
somehow, to save face, the state
00:22:26
that attacked us, which committed a
00:22:28
massive riot, is a riot not as a geolocation, but
00:22:31
as a phenomenon throughout the country and Mr.
00:22:34
Larionov I think it would be fair
00:22:35
to say that Amir does not yet know what kind of
00:22:37
Russia he wants, what he sees as the end of
00:22:39
this war. Because there is a Western
00:22:42
press, Western analysts who write to
00:22:44
prevent Russia from being defeated too much
00:22:46
and not from winning too much
00:22:49
Ukraine Well, this sounds
00:22:51
like it’s 50/50 Let’s go back to the
00:22:54
state before February 24, which Ukraine
00:22:56
no longer agrees on. You’re just talking about
00:22:59
plans that go very far and we
00:23:02
still don’t know what
00:23:04
our allies are finally betting on
00:23:06
giving us enough
00:23:09
weapons a teaspoon at a time to defend our
00:23:11
country
00:23:12
in the first place You asked me What is
00:23:15
Macron’s point of view and
00:23:17
what, from my point of view, could be
00:23:20
provided security guarantees it
00:23:22
was This is the answer Now you are asking another
00:23:25
question and what is your position calling them
00:23:28
allies, they have never called themselves an ally.
00:23:30
They call themselves, at
00:23:32
best, partners, which is by the way. There is a big
00:23:33
difference, a fundamentally meaningful
00:23:35
difference between allies and partners, and that
00:23:38
same pipette help that you just
00:23:41
hinted about, which I’ve been
00:23:43
talking about for several months, is
00:23:45
one of the evidences Because these are not
00:23:47
allies, but partners, and they
00:23:49
are guided in their actions by their
00:23:53
own understanding of what they would
00:23:55
like to achieve. You referred to that
00:23:58
publication that was a few days
00:23:59
ago and which, in fact,
00:24:04
formulates this task in the public space. But if the
00:24:08
relationship is not allowed to become big or
00:24:11
what I would be confident that such a significant
00:24:15
Victory would be noticeable on the part of Ukraine. But what has been
00:24:17
published today has been made
00:24:19
public in the public space
00:24:21
has been an open secret in
00:24:24
Washington in the last few months
00:24:26
because this is the
00:24:28
official position of the current
00:24:30
administration of the current Baydan administration
00:24:32
in relation to Ukraine, their
00:24:35
position has been repeatedly formulated in all
00:24:38
internal negotiations discussions in
00:24:40
brainstorming sessions is to
00:24:43
not let Ukraine win, not to let Putin
00:24:47
lose, this is the official position
00:24:49
formulated and the leadership of the
00:24:52
Biden administration is
00:24:55
guided by precisely this approach, they are
00:24:58
acting from the point of view of providing
00:25:01
military assistance to Ukraine. This is the most
00:25:03
heel help in terms of the
00:25:05
constant leaking of various information
00:25:08
including intelligence ones,
00:25:09
which, it seems to me, do not always
00:25:12
benefit Ukraine and often cause
00:25:14
harm to it. And this is also manifested in
00:25:18
numerous publications of so-
00:25:20
called pressure on Ukraine,
00:25:22
forcing Ukraine to move on to
00:25:25
negotiations on unfavorable terms for
00:25:28
Ukraine on terms that do not
00:25:30
ensure the restoration of
00:25:32
territorial integrity Ukraine, all
00:25:34
this taken together is
00:25:36
evidence of the implementation of the very
00:25:39
strategy that you spoke about, which
00:25:42
became known to a wide circle of people
00:25:44
only a few days ago, but this is the
00:25:47
same strategy that the administration has been
00:25:49
pursuing since the very beginning of this
00:25:52
stage of a
00:25:53
full-scale Russian Ukrainian
00:25:56
war, the beginning of this full-scale
00:25:59
aggression with
00:26:00
Larionov accepted Putin’s side. And what’s so terrible about
00:26:03
Ukraine winning and Putin losing?
00:26:05
Putin today he’s
00:26:08
already cooperating. It’s not a
00:26:10
secret with a terrorist country, it’s
00:26:12
almost probably the same with Iran,
00:26:14
everyone there is whispering behind their back, they say. Well,
00:26:17
maybe he’s sharing nuclear
00:26:19
developments which are extremely necessary for
00:26:20
Iran And then we understand that Iran
00:26:22
will not weigh the pros and cons of waiting for 9
00:26:27
additional packages of sanctions against itself. He will have ready-made
00:26:29
weapons, he will use them. Well, that is,
00:26:31
everything here says that there is pure
00:26:33
evil and I am not suggesting of course the West should go on a
00:26:36
crusade, but evil must be
00:26:38
punished, and here are these doubts. What
00:26:41
should be in this case on the
00:26:43
other side of this cup, that it
00:26:45
outweighs them? No no Well,
00:26:47
let Ukraine just stay afloat. You
00:26:49
know, you tried to
00:26:52
equate or bring the current
00:26:55
Kremlin regime closer from the current to the current
00:26:57
Iranian regime,
00:26:58
believing that the Iranian regime is worse, but
00:27:02
you know, for
00:27:03
international security and peace and from the
00:27:07
point of view of how many people have already
00:27:08
died, the current Kremlin regime
00:27:11
is much more dangerous. I rather
00:27:13
separated them with a comma. Well, in general,
00:27:17
considering what the
00:27:19
Kremlin regime is doing today in Ukraine, I wouldn’t
00:27:21
put even a comma in it. The Kremlin
00:27:23
regime is now doing much more
00:27:26
damage to the international security world. And
00:27:29
in Ukraine, it’s really the
00:27:33
Putin regime that is committing the crime first of all. The Iranian regime
00:27:36
here is at best prestigious,
00:27:37
so I think other emphasis needs to be placed.
00:27:40
And first of all, the guilty one. The
00:27:45
Kremlin regime is committing a crime and it is no coincidence that
00:27:47
many international bodies, including the
00:27:51
European Parliament, have adopted resolutions
00:27:53
saying that this regime is
00:27:55
either a sponsor of terrorism or a
00:27:58
terrorist regime. I think that this
00:28:00
assessment is much more accurate. The
00:28:02
second thing you say is that what’s terrible
00:28:06
for Ukraine to win is never
00:28:08
just scary for anyone, for you there
00:28:11
is nothing scary in this, it is a normal phenomenon,
00:28:12
for me there is nothing scary in this. This is an
00:28:15
absolutely normal phenomenon for friends,
00:28:17
supporters of Ukraine, true allies
00:28:19
of Ukraine, this is a natural state, but
00:28:22
for those who call themselves partners, but
00:28:25
stick have a different point of view and
00:28:27
pursue other goals; for them it’s
00:28:30
really scary.
00:28:32
Why is it scary because today’s
00:28:35
Ukraine in its actions A is seriously
00:28:38
different from the Ukraine they would
00:28:40
like to see for themselves? They would like to
00:28:43
see Ukraine governed; They would like
00:28:46
Ukraine to act according to those patterns
00:28:50
A according to the demands that are heard
00:28:54
from the White House, you probably haven’t forgotten what
00:28:57
the President of the United States of
00:28:58
America said to the President of Ukraine two days before the
00:29:01
start of this large-scale
00:29:03
offensive and immediately as soon as this
00:29:06
large-scale aggression was a dream,
00:29:08
leave Kiev already, what they said about
00:29:13
colleagues
00:29:14
in the White House when Mr. Kuleba came there
00:29:17
to say you are the same
00:29:19
president. You should take care of your
00:29:22
son, about your children. You should not
00:29:24
take care of Ukraine, but not President
00:29:27
Zelensky, not Foreign Minister
00:29:30
Kuleba, nor other representatives of the
00:29:33
Ukrainian leadership, nor the leadership of the
00:29:35
armed forces of Ukraine, not all of them, not the
00:29:38
vast majority Ukrainian
00:29:39
society, they followed the advice that was
00:29:42
given from the White House for
00:29:44
many months on the eve of this aggression and
00:29:47
during this aggression they
00:29:50
decided to defend their own country
00:29:52
and fight no matter what as a killer,
00:29:54
but this was not acceptable
00:29:57
because these
00:29:59
representatives of the White House I would be happy with
00:30:02
another option for President Zelensky
00:30:05
to leave the country for Mr. Kuleba to
00:30:08
take care of his children for the
00:30:10
leadership of the Ukrainian armed forces to
00:30:12
switch over to the so-called Guerrilla
00:30:14
War, which they advertised for
00:30:17
many months before this
00:30:19
offensive,
00:30:20
to break Guerrilla resistance is
00:30:22
much easier than organized
00:30:24
resistance to the state, we must not
00:30:27
forget about what recommendations
00:30:30
these people gave and continue to give Now
00:30:32
What recommendations are they now giving,
00:30:35
move on to negotiations On what
00:30:37
conditions But on those conditions for
00:30:39
which there are what proposals were not given
00:30:41
forget about Crimea once for 25 years
00:30:44
once for 7 years forget about who
00:30:47
gives these recommendations? Who
00:30:51
gave the statement that
00:30:53
Ukraine will hold out? Only for three days Putin
00:30:56
Putin doesn’t say anything about it. Putin
00:30:58
was silent about it. The White House reported on this. The
00:31:01
American press wrote about it.
00:31:03
They were the ones who led this mass campaign
00:31:06
that Ukraine won’t hold out. for more than
00:31:08
three days, thereby exerting a
00:31:10
propaganda influence on the
00:31:12
Ukrainian leadership on Ukrainian
00:31:14
society. They didn’t know that Ukraine
00:31:16
would resist. They didn’t know
00:31:18
that Ukraine would fight, that it would not be in
00:31:21
three days, not in three weeks, not in three
00:31:23
months, they knew all this, but they led this
00:31:25
company,
00:31:27
therefore we have our position and your
00:31:30
position, it is not an easy position and therefore it is
00:31:32
necessary to clearly place emphasis. Yes,
00:31:37
today
00:31:38
the partners are giving assistance, it is important, this is
00:31:42
important assistance, this assistance helps
00:31:44
Ukraine resist direct aggression and
00:31:47
we appreciate this assistance and we are grateful for
00:31:50
this assistance for this assistance is
00:31:51
provided by the American people,
00:31:54
who overwhelmingly
00:31:55
support Ukraine, who vote to
00:31:59
support Ukraine, over 70 percent of
00:32:02
American citizens are in favor of all
00:32:05
possible support for Ukraine, from 30 to 40
00:32:07
percent of
00:32:09
Americans are even in favor of providing
00:32:12
direct military assistance with the participation of the
00:32:14
armed forces of the
00:32:15
United States of America directly on the side of
00:32:17
Ukraine, this is the opinion of the American people;
00:32:23
at the same time, the leadership of the
00:32:26
current leadership of the American
00:32:29
administration is pursuing a more complex
00:32:32
policy in which it does not provide the
00:32:37
necessary support for
00:32:39
Ukraine to win; it has been said many times in the
00:32:43
last
00:32:45
eight-seven months about the so
00:32:47
-called Lend-Lease program for
00:32:49
Ukraine a law that on May 9 was
00:32:53
forced to be signed by President Biden
00:32:56
because the Congress and the House
00:32:59
of Representatives and the Senate
00:33:01
voted unanimously for this law,
00:33:04
the question arises: How much was supplied under the law for the
00:33:07
lease of weapons of military equipment and
00:33:10
ammunition from May 9, the reason is
00:33:14
today through the middle of December The answer is simple,
00:33:18
nothing, zero, none tank, not a single
00:33:22
armored vehicle, not a single artillery
00:33:24
piece, not a single machine gun, not a single
00:33:26
cartridge, nothing in 10 months,
00:33:36
which in 1941 was signed by
00:33:40
President Roosevelt on
00:33:42
March 11, 1941, primarily to
00:33:47
help Great Britain, then in two and a
00:33:50
half months from March 11, 1941 to 1
00:33:54
June 1941, President Roosevelt and the
00:33:58
Roosevelt administration provided
00:34:01
Great Britain with military equipment and
00:34:04
ammunition worth $7 billion
00:34:06
since prices were
00:34:09
different then, in terms of today's prices
00:34:11
this amounted to $107.5 billion again
00:34:17
$107.5 billion in two and a half
00:34:20
months, that is an average of 40 billion
00:34:23
dollars a month at today's prices, let me
00:34:27
remind you once again since May 9, Ukraine
00:34:30
has not received anything, but Ukraine has received it
00:34:33
objectively speaking, we also need to know this through
00:34:35
four other channels, there are four
00:34:37
other channels through which Ukraine
00:34:39
receives military assistance, as long as we know
00:34:42
this figure is
00:34:43
12.7 billion dollars That is,
00:34:47
per month for 10 months This is
00:34:50
approximately 1.3 billion dollars per month
00:34:53
and now Compare
00:34:56
President Roosevel in 1941
00:35:01
provided military assistance to
00:35:02
Great Britain, which then alone
00:35:05
fought against the Wehrmacht
00:35:08
against the Reich against almost all of
00:35:11
occupied Europe Germany Italy and
00:35:14
its allies received 40 billion
00:35:17
dollars in military assistance per month.
00:35:19
Ukraine today, which alone is waging a
00:35:22
war against an enemy aggressor who
00:35:25
many times exceeds it in
00:35:28
economic, military, financial and
00:35:30
other potential, assistance in the amount of 1.3
00:35:33
billion dollars. How many times is this
00:35:35
less?
00:35:38
These figures show the attitude two
00:35:42
different administrations of the United States of
00:35:45
America by the way, lunch administrations
00:35:47
are democratic
00:35:48
The Democratic Roosevelt Administration
00:35:50
and the Democratic Biden Administration
00:35:53
what is the problem The problem is not even the
00:35:56
party is not the party of this
00:35:58
administration the demon of this administration the problem is the leaders of
00:36:01
this administration and for different purposes
00:36:04
What are these administrations one
00:36:06
Administration pursued in 41 and
00:36:08
the other administration is pursuing the twenty-
00:36:10
second year, it is
00:36:13
extremely difficult to
00:36:15
cover up here you are talking with numbers and facts
00:36:18
and Well, everything really is as it is,
00:36:20
but you understand that we are from Kiev, I’m probably
00:36:22
suggesting this to her Although our
00:36:25
diplomats are making every effort to
00:36:26
squeeze out this help, we simply cannot and
00:36:29
so it seems to me that all this is not
00:36:30
science fiction, but let me ask you this,
00:36:32
right? Well, of course,
00:36:35
we probably know, and Mr. Sullivan is
00:36:38
more of a dove of peace who
00:36:40
calls for negotiations and so on, but is it
00:36:42
fair to say that
00:36:44
today Ukraine is relying to
00:36:46
the aid of her allies, as you say,
00:36:48
she still makes the decision herself
00:36:50
because you know, and for example, we
00:36:52
still haven’t received any other types of
00:36:54
weapons that we asked for; they are not there, but
00:36:57
no, no, we will strike
00:36:59
strategic airfields with something of our own. to the rear of
00:37:02
the Russian Federation, this is an event that
00:37:04
happened last week and here we
00:37:06
could probably wait endlessly for the
00:37:08
Western
00:37:09
allies to help us with something and the Partners,
00:37:12
but they decided that they themselves and would it be
00:37:16
unfair to say now
00:37:18
that they would now impose peace on Ukraine or
00:37:21
their Peace Plan if not it’s impossible, then at
00:37:24
least it will become extremely difficult,
00:37:26
first of all, regarding Ukrainian
00:37:30
diplomats. Please tell me, have you
00:37:32
heard any of the Ukrainian
00:37:35
diplomats or the Ukrainian
00:37:37
leadership in general talk about the need for
00:37:39
linguistics?
00:37:42
You understand that we are not allowed to those places
00:37:44
where these topics are discussed but Ukraine
00:37:47
publicly said that, of course, it was very
00:37:49
happy that the Land Lease law was signed in America,
00:37:51
and I will remind you that in the
00:37:54
Western press there were materials where,
00:37:57
according to representatives of the White House,
00:37:59
they asked not to criticize Joe Biden for
00:38:01
little help to Ukraine, and there were such
00:38:04
signals, look here: then the specific
00:38:07
questions are what
00:38:10
representatives of Ukrainian diplomacy said,
00:38:12
representatives of the Ukrainian leadership will
00:38:14
clearly name at least those three
00:38:16
cases that I saw and heard that were
00:38:20
voiced in the public space on
00:38:22
May 9 of this year, President Zelensky
00:38:25
publicly thanked President Biden
00:38:28
for signing the law and expressed hope
00:38:31
that with the help of this instrument, Ukraine
00:38:33
will receive all the necessary weapons,
00:38:35
including offensive weapons, including
00:38:36
heavy weapons that will allow
00:38:38
the liberation of Ukrainian territories, this is
00:38:41
the position of the American President, the second
00:38:43
point of view that I heard is the
00:38:45
speech of representatives of Ukrainian
00:38:47
diplomacy, the Ambassador of Ukraine to the United
00:38:50
States of America in Washington, Oksana
00:38:52
Markarova, who told us we don’t need a
00:38:54
linguist, he’s harmful to the fox because this
00:38:58
Lindis is for money and therefore Ukraine sooner
00:39:01
or later has to pay for this
00:39:02
linguist and that’s why we don’t need it, so
00:39:04
let’s better what other things and there was a
00:39:07
third opinion not from the Ukrainian chairman of
00:39:10
Ukrainian diplomacy, but from the representative of the
00:39:12
Ukrainian defense sector, Minister of
00:39:13
Defense Rechnikov who said
00:39:15
about a month after
00:39:18
Ms. Makarov’s comment that our partners have
00:39:21
not yet decided which model they are ready to
00:39:24
use or will use when
00:39:27
supplying Ukraine.
00:39:30
Thus, we see three different points
00:39:34
of view that do not coincide. But this is all from
00:39:36
what at least came to me
00:39:38
I don’t see with my eyes or hear that in the public
00:39:41
space there would be like any, let
00:39:43
alone company, but at least individual
00:39:46
speeches that would remind
00:39:47
partners that the United States of
00:39:51
America, represented by the highest legislative
00:39:53
body of this country, the Congress of the United
00:39:55
States of America, adopted a law that
00:39:59
grants the President of the United
00:40:01
States of America unlimited rights to
00:40:04
supply weapons to Ukraine, and it must be
00:40:06
said frankly that the comments that
00:40:09
Ukraine should pay any money for this linguist
00:40:12
are not
00:40:14
true, apparently
00:40:18
Mrs. Markarova did not read the legal
00:40:21
limit in the Liza law there is a clear
00:40:23
provision that that two
00:40:25
provisions of the laws on
00:40:28
foreign military assistance and in the
00:40:31
law on the export of weapons are canceled.
00:40:33
According to the cancellation of those points that are indicated there, the
00:40:38
five-year period that was in effect for
00:40:40
Lend-Lease for Ukraine A is canceled This is the
00:40:43
first point and the second is canceled payments
00:40:46
for loans provided in Lis tapes in
00:40:50
rental of weapons,
00:40:53
military equipment and other defense
00:40:55
materials that are provided under
00:40:58
this law, respectively, today there are
00:41:01
no
00:41:02
requirements for Ukraine to
00:41:05
pay for the Len-list in
00:41:08
accordance with current American
00:41:10
legislation and, accordingly, the
00:41:12
provision of this assistance through the channel is
00:41:14
no different from the Grant,
00:41:18
I’m not even I’m talking about counting
00:41:21
money at the moment when
00:41:23
Ukrainian servicemen are dying, dying from the fact
00:41:26
that they do not have enough weapons from the fact that
00:41:29
they do not have enough ammunition, this
00:41:31
is simply blasphemous
00:41:34
When in 1941 weapons
00:41:39
were received by lens Great Britain France China
00:41:42
Soviet Union None of these countries Although
00:41:45
in the same Soviet Union
00:41:48
he sat in the Kremlin and a tyrant comparable to the current one did not
00:41:52
consider that we need to
00:41:54
pay something for this, so we will not receive anything
00:41:56
in war conditions, there is nothing more
00:41:58
important to receive
00:42:00
all the necessary weapons today
00:42:03
So these arguments are not
00:42:06
true even before I add
00:42:09
that the European Union has just now
00:42:11
decided to provide a large
00:42:13
package of economic assistance to Ukraine, but
00:42:16
this is not assistance, this is a loan, this is a loan for
00:42:19
which Ukraine will really have to
00:42:21
pay, that is, it turns out for
00:42:23
financial assistance for budgetary assistance
00:42:26
Ukrainian the leadership is ready to pay
00:42:28
interest and pay for it because it is a
00:42:31
loan and not a gift. And for military assistance
00:42:33
that saves the country and the armed
00:42:36
forces of Ukraine from destruction and
00:42:39
critical infrastructure and
00:42:41
civilians, we mean we will look at when
00:42:44
we should pay for it when we
00:42:46
should pay it These are completely
00:42:48
worthless arguments that have no
00:42:50
basis in any way, we are
00:42:54
moving away from this topic, you know that
00:42:57
Ukraine has become a certain
00:42:58
topic of speculation in domestic American
00:43:01
politics because it has just ended,
00:43:03
which took place there and what is
00:43:05
circulating in Ukraine, and now you
00:43:07
will correct the fact that Lend-Lease this
00:43:09
signed law is Plan B Plan B
00:43:12
when they will not be able to so easily and simply
00:43:14
agree on packages of
00:43:16
financial and military support for Ukraine
00:43:18
if American politicians are against it,
00:43:21
then Langleys will come into force. I don’t
00:43:24
know how fair it is
00:43:25
to assume that just from next
00:43:27
year it is quite possible he could
00:43:28
make money because you know now
00:43:31
there are congressmen politicians who
00:43:32
say first an audit, first a check of
00:43:35
what you need for Ukraine and only
00:43:38
then We return to the issue of
00:43:40
providing further assistance,
00:43:43
this is a false argument, this is
00:43:45
disinformation
00:43:47
thrown into the Ukrainian public
00:43:50
space for which there is no
00:43:51
basis I wanted I would like to remind those
00:43:54
who continue to believe in this
00:43:56
disinformation, just basic facts, the law
00:44:00
was introduced into the Congress of the United
00:44:03
States by Republican Senator
00:44:06
Root John Root and Stichas in
00:44:09
January of this year even before the start of
00:44:13
large-scale aggression against Ukraine,
00:44:15
and this bill was introduced not because there
00:44:19
would be support there
00:44:23
support for the aggression itself will not be provided yet,
00:44:25
this law was carried out in order to
00:44:27
provide the President of the United
00:44:29
States of America and his administration with
00:44:31
the opportunity to supply
00:44:33
weapons to Ukraine without restrictions before
00:44:36
the aggression begins before this was introduced on
00:44:40
January 19 of this year for this purpose
00:44:44
this bill was supported not only
00:44:48
the Republicans were supported by the Democrats,
00:44:50
I’ll say it again, it was supported by an incredible
00:44:52
number of senators and congressmen. There
00:44:59
was no such unanimous support for such a bill in the Congress of the United States of America for several
00:45:00
decades when it was adopted, and during the
00:45:04
course of all those who took part in its
00:45:07
development in promoting the adoption, they made
00:45:10
comments, no such comments about the
00:45:12
fact that this law will be applied
00:45:14
when any support supposedly disappears. This was
00:45:18
not the case. In any
00:45:20
case, on the contrary, they said this law is
00:45:22
being adopted in order to give Ukraine the
00:45:25
opportunity to provide heavy weapons; the
00:45:27
same Mr. Cornyn,
00:45:30
speaking at the end of April, said they need
00:45:34
planes; they need them. tanks are needed, armored vehicles are
00:45:36
needed, heavy artillery is needed in order to
00:45:39
break into the enemy’s defenses. That’s why
00:45:41
this very law was adopted, it had nothing to
00:45:43
do with the political
00:45:47
battles within the United States of
00:45:50
America itself. Well, if we talk about
00:45:51
political battles, it is necessary to keep in mind
00:45:53
that when
00:45:55
the leader of the Republican
00:45:57
minority The leader of the Republican
00:45:59
minority in the House of Representatives,
00:46:02
McCarthy in September of this year made
00:46:06
his Dimash, as a result of
00:46:07
which he wrested from the
00:46:11
administration promises to provide
00:46:13
military assistance to Ukraine in the next
00:46:17
fiscal year 23 fiscal year in the
00:46:20
amount of $ 50 billion. However, as you
00:46:23
know, the midterm elections
00:46:26
in November did not work out what is the reddest
00:46:29
wave when the Republicans would have received
00:46:31
both chambers, they received only one
00:46:33
chamber, the lower house, but did not receive
00:46:35
the Senate. What consequences did this have for
00:46:37
Ukraine? very simple; the
00:46:40
Biden administration immediately reduced this package,
00:46:43
which was agreed upon by the Republicans from
00:46:45
50 billion dollars to 37 billion.
00:46:48
Yes, these 37 billion dollars were
00:46:51
included in the draft budget that
00:46:53
was discussed and it is now being discussed there.
00:46:55
But now, nevertheless, the House
00:46:58
of Representatives is controlled by
00:47:00
the Republicans. What did they do when
00:47:02
discussing the budget of the draft budget of the
00:47:05
United States Department of Defense
00:47:07
for the year 23? The first decision was
00:47:10
to increase
00:47:11
financial military assistance to Ukraine who
00:47:15
this was done by the House of Representatives in
00:47:17
which the majority is now represented by
00:47:19
Republicans. Do you understand how
00:47:22
Ukrainian public opinion has
00:47:24
been misleading you for all these months?
00:47:26
How you have been misinformed about
00:47:29
what is happening in the United States of
00:47:31
America and who takes what position. Your
00:47:33
last point is what
00:47:35
he says. now So the law from
00:47:40
the people will work next year. Let's
00:47:43
see what was the law, the law came
00:47:47
into effect the moment it was signed by the
00:47:49
President of the United States of America on
00:47:51
May 9, and then everyone, including, by the
00:47:54
way, President Zelensky said that
00:47:55
now it’s just will this
00:47:57
weapon work it didn’t work that they began
00:48:00
to tell us they came up with a story
00:48:01
says it will go in 60 days in 60
00:48:04
days it doesn’t work for 60 days the
00:48:08
President of the United States of America
00:48:10
had to introduce an accelerated procedure
00:48:12
they should have earned it they didn’t
00:48:14
work because the President of the
00:48:15
United States didn’t do this and
00:48:17
60 days later, on July 8, 22,
00:48:22
nothing went according to this law, then they
00:48:25
came up with a new piece of information, this
00:48:27
information was invented by the same
00:48:29
disinformer
00:48:30
Major Shvets about whom we talked
00:48:32
earlier that this law will start
00:48:34
working on October 1, this is a lie because
00:48:37
the law began to work on May 1, May 9
00:48:40
came October 1 Well, it started
00:48:42
working Of course not, now you have
00:48:45
come up with new misinformation that this
00:48:47
law will begin to work
00:48:48
next year,
00:48:53
this law will stop working, this law was
00:48:57
adopted by us for a very specific period of
00:48:59
time, this is in the text of the law from May 9, 22
00:49:03
to September 30, 23 years have now
00:49:07
passed from May 9 to today
00:49:11
How many months have passed? 7 months I
00:49:13
read correctly seven months left
00:49:17
nine months a little more than 9 months Until the
00:49:21
end of
00:49:22
this law, what is the meaning of the
00:49:26
information here? We started our conversation with
00:49:28
misinformation who works for who
00:49:31
all this disinformation that
00:49:33
was carried out during this year was
00:49:35
aimed at lulling the attention of the
00:49:37
Ukrainian public and the Ukrainian
00:49:40
leadership and the diplomatic military
00:49:43
political from the most important instrument
00:49:45
that can provide assistance to
00:49:48
Ukraine in the UN story today it will not
00:49:50
work it will be in 60 days it will be
00:49:52
work on October 1, he will work
00:49:54
next year so that they do not
00:49:56
pay attention to this, wait for what on
00:49:58
September 30, 23 when
00:50:01
this law expires so
00:50:04
that Ukraine does not receive the much-
00:50:06
needed weapons necessary to
00:50:08
liberate the country and prevent the death of both
00:50:12
military and civilians persons in
00:50:15
order to bring victory to Ukraine, here is a
00:50:17
direct example of how this
00:50:20
information works. You must keep this in mind and
00:50:22
you yourself must, not only with our
00:50:25
help, those who are trying, but also
00:50:28
to identify these information
00:50:30
companies that are directed against you,
00:50:33
Larionov has literally a couple of minutes
00:50:35
left so then to finish off this topic,
00:50:37
I just when you speak,
00:50:40
the arguments I hear are accepted, but
00:50:42
look, Harry Tabakh was our guest at one time,
00:50:45
but he is an American citizen and he
00:50:48
also talks about the land list, but at the
00:50:51
same time he says I am an American citizen I
00:50:52
supported Lis and I go to lobbyists and
00:50:56
demand that Ukraine earn money. I am
00:50:59
Ukrainian, I have a Ukrainian passport. David
00:51:01
against Americans, I can’t in any way
00:51:03
our politics. I’m sure that they, too, to put it
00:51:06
mildly, are on the ropes
00:51:07
because they are,
00:51:09
and so we are already scholz of this. Macron there are
00:51:13
not many countries that were ready to
00:51:16
immediately support us, but if we take
00:51:19
all your argumentation, everything that you are
00:51:21
saying now, do you think that we can
00:51:24
somehow change the policy of the United
00:51:27
States? The White House says: We all know,
00:51:29
we understand what you want, you want to
00:51:31
reach September You want Osta without
00:51:34
Lend-Lease Will this really be of any
00:51:36
help? That is, I don’t quite understand how to
00:51:39
correctly use the tools that you give,
00:51:44
look at the
00:51:46
specific tools, of course not you, not the
00:51:50
vast majority of those who
00:51:52
listen to you and watch cannot
00:51:53
use them because they are not
00:51:54
participate in these diplomatic
00:51:56
firefights, it’s clear that we are this
00:51:58
tool and several
00:52:00
people use this tool, the Ukrainian leadership in the
00:52:02
political leadership, the diplomatic
00:52:04
leadership, the military leadership. They conduct these
00:52:06
negotiations, but
00:52:08
Ukrainian society still has
00:52:10
enormous opportunities, opportunities
00:52:13
that perhaps no
00:52:15
other society has today. Because
00:52:17
because it Ukraine because Ukraine and the
00:52:20
people still have the right to express
00:52:23
their point of view and no one can take away this right of the
00:52:26
Ukrainian people.
00:52:28
Therefore, it is important that
00:52:31
the words “we don’t want to receive” were not heard in the public opinion of Ukraine.
00:52:36
Because if we speak, but they
00:52:39
sound, he says because he is dear
00:52:40
because we have to pay for it because
00:52:42
we don’t need the
00:52:43
same partners then these same
00:52:47
Americans Partner Wait, this is not we don’t
00:52:49
want to give this you don’t want to
00:52:51
receive then the position conclude no we
00:52:54
want to receive moreover, we need this
00:52:57
moreover, you have adopted a law the
00:53:01
entire Congress voted for this law; the
00:53:03
entire Senate voted for this law; this law is
00:53:06
supported by the vast
00:53:09
majority of the American people, and the
00:53:11
entire American people, both Republicans
00:53:15
and Democrats, regardless of their
00:53:17
political affiliation, we are all in
00:53:19
favor of one, when will supplies be
00:53:23
delivered, when will they be delivered, when
00:53:26
you should not
00:53:29
It may be clear that you are in a
00:53:32
difficult situation, but it is not you who should
00:53:34
talk about it, and now we will erect
00:53:35
monuments to those people who deny
00:53:38
you weapons. No, you must respectfully
00:53:41
As he speaks respectably without violating the
00:53:45
rules of good manners and diplomacy, but
00:53:47
speak firmly You have this law You
00:53:51
promised you said by the way the
00:53:53
press list of the Pentagon Department of Defense on
00:53:55
May 9 says Now the
00:53:57
United States will supply
00:53:59
offensive weapons heavy weapons to
00:54:01
Ukraine this is not someone said this is a
00:54:04
press release from the Department of Defense of the
00:54:06
United States of America refer to
00:54:08
these documents refer to the law
00:54:10
refer to speech by
00:54:13
congressional senators and representatives of the administration of the
00:54:15
United States of America You have
00:54:17
the tools, we need these weapons This is
00:54:20
your position Don’t offend them, don’t
00:54:23
insult them, don’t call them
00:54:25
bad words But you need to demand
00:54:27
what you need This is what you need,
00:54:30
these are not toys, this is the life of your people
00:54:33
thousands and thousands of your fellow citizens, our
00:54:37
friends, and this is a guarantee of the liberation
00:54:42
of Ukraine, this is a guarantee that the aggressor and
00:54:46
criminal will sooner or later be punished
00:54:49
and sooner or later all the demands
00:54:51
that we spoke to you at
00:54:53
the beginning will be implemented. Ukraine
00:54:55
will restore its territorial
00:54:57
integrity and those captured
00:55:00
will return. on the territory of Ukraine,
00:55:02
criminals will be punished with the help of an
00:55:05
international tribunal; the aggressor
00:55:07
will pay reparations and
00:55:10
appropriate international guarantees will be accepted
00:55:12
that no new aggression will ever be committed on Russian territory,
00:55:15
not
00:55:17
against Ukraine, not against any
00:55:19
other state.
00:55:21
Yes, here I subscribe, of course, in this
00:55:23
regard to each in your words, Mr.
00:55:25
Larionov, I thank you for
00:55:27
taking part in our stream; in our
00:55:30
conversation, it didn’t start easily, but I
00:55:33
hope that now we can say
00:55:34
that it ended easily. Thank you very much
00:55:36
for sharing your view with us.
00:55:38
And I really want yours to be there in America
00:55:42
the words were heard, it would be important and
00:55:44
I would really like for you and me to
00:55:45
already state the fact that Lend-Lease
00:55:47
has started working and it would be better if we summed up its
00:55:50
results than talking about the fact that for now it is
00:55:52
Well, in such a dead state Thank you
00:55:55
very much,
00:55:58
friends, friends visiting us today buf
00:56:01
Andrei Illarionov senior science
00:56:04
poor centers politics Washington I'm in
00:56:08
decline Vasya that
00:56:10
we are already waiting for your galley to the factories
00:56:12
vector and we are here in Ukraine Although in
00:56:16
fact Krim's law went to the topic in terms of
00:56:19
We are great
00:56:21
but we know the tower about discussions
00:56:25
how can I
00:56:26
Russia my everyday life I doubt that
00:56:30
today we had to know who I saved Stream
00:56:32
was inspired And what does it mean to drink
00:56:34
splendor on Youtube channel Kurbanov Life
00:56:36
that you will get drunk from YouTube directly to you
00:56:38
and subscribe to know your like with
00:56:41
me is absolutely for us your level
00:56:42
means
00:56:45
But also traditionally expressed in Ukraine
00:56:54
[music]

Description:

Донбас та Південь у огні. Щодня російські війська зрівнюють із землею все, що не можуть захопити. Щодня поранені та загиблі з обох сторін. Попри переважаючі сили рашистського окупанта, Українські Воїни нещадно луплять ворог та до останнього захищатимуть свою землю. Про нас та про них гарячий стрім з Андрієм Ілларіоновим о 21-00. НЕ пропустіть! ❗️ Друзі, обов'язково підписуйтесь на канал Курбаанова LIVE 👉 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmubOD8Nem4wYO7lqF1e0kw?sub_confirmation=1 Також підписуйтесь на наш телеграм - Територію русофобії: https://t.me/KurbanovaNEWS Підтримати наш канал можна: Монобанка: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/32Fn3Fimx8 Картка Приват (UAH) 4149609014031266 Картка Приват (USD) 5168745108203404 PayPal [email protected] https://www.patreon.com/Kurbanova_LIVE

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "💥 ІЛЛАРІОНОВ | Залужний дав ЛЯПАСА путіну, росія НАСПРАВДІ вже втратила більше 100 тисяч військових"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.