Download "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252Fhh_WHWBSQ24%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Table of contents
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252F3tqaj9bDfik%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252F4fM5W7qrV2k%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FDL8uZ7sMKxU%252Fsddefault.jpg%253Fsqp%253D-oaymwEmCIAFEOAD8quKqQMa8AEB-AHWBYACkAOKAgwIABABGGUgWyhPMA8%253D%2526rs%253DAOn4CLCwSQL2N7QOIyxuIoHNZ9_zSgU9tg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FIxnc9sB6qZU%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FRYIdGYl62Cg%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FbzjKfXEFlEM%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252Fh_ekSQwitW4%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FvozH77PW1dE%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
![Гравитация — это не сила [Veritasium]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Funidownloader.com%2FcontentImages%2FxudMTaRP_uMJEMBJNn1tzLdRw0A%3D%2Ffilters%3Aquality(80)%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FwKXsHqExLGQ%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252Fzm18MlyymhQ%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
Russian
00:00:02
science does not stand in one place and moves00:00:06
forward by leaps and bounds. There is00:00:08
still a generation alive in which telephones00:00:12
were so rare that he had to00:00:14
go out into the street and go to the only00:00:18
payphone on the block to call00:00:21
someone, and the one you call in00:00:24
turn stood at the appointed time at00:00:27
another payphone on the street or at the post office00:00:30
in my city and waited for a call, and in00:00:33
fact, I myself am from that generation, and00:00:36
now everyone has in their hand not just00:00:38
a phone, but a whole switchboard, the appearance of00:00:42
which was predicted back in the mid-00:00:44
90s and even earlier Now everyone does00:00:48
n’t even have just one phone, but several;00:00:50
every home has a computer; and even in their pockets,00:00:53
car systems are controlled by00:00:56
navigation and service computers.00:01:00
In literally 30 years, we have made a scientific00:01:03
leap, and more than once, the life that was then00:01:08
before seems to us some kind of wild00:01:11
barbarism and a primitive scoop, and00:01:14
what happened a hundred years ago is already impossible to imagine,00:01:19
now we know everything about the nature of the universe,00:01:22
and what we don’t know, we will discover as soon as00:01:26
possible, but is this true,00:01:28
where are we going in what00:01:32
direction and who is leading us there,00:01:36
hello everyone, you’re back on the channel an era of00:01:40
mistrust with Michael for you and for you, and00:01:42
today we will talk a little about00:01:44
modern exact sciences, therefore, without00:01:49
unnecessary introductions, straight to the point, but those00:01:52
who are not in the subject will understand the campaign of the video00:01:57
lyrics and physics,00:02:01
most people on this planet00:02:03
clearly share the exact sciences00:02:06
and humanitarian flies separately cutlets00:02:10
separately it is understandable that exact sciences are00:02:14
called exact because the00:02:17
result of their conclusions and calculations00:02:20
is predicted and repeated under the same00:02:23
conditions at any convenient time, in00:02:26
fact, all our00:02:29
technologies are built on this, we know exactly what we will get as a00:02:33
result if we produce something like this a specific00:02:36
action, for example, by applying a00:02:40
strictly specified amount of00:02:42
voltage to a computer processor strictly for a given00:02:44
transistor or group of transistors, we00:02:47
will receive a strictly measured result at the output.00:02:50
On this principle, obtaining an00:02:53
accurate and desired result,00:02:56
literally everything works, from simple roles to the00:03:00
most complex calculators from00:03:03
your electrical outlet at home to00:03:06
engine parts in a tank, from a washing machine00:03:09
to a smartphone in your hand, from a simple00:03:12
rifle to a space rocket, we00:03:16
know exactly what to get and how to get it,00:03:20
however, there are still inexplicable00:03:24
cases when working with equipment, each of00:03:27
us has encountered something like this at least once00:03:30
everything goes exactly according to the planned scheme,00:03:33
but the result is00:03:35
unpredictable, these cases are quite rare00:03:40
and in the vast majority are easily00:03:42
explained by a violation of the technological00:03:45
process by some unplanned and00:03:49
unaccounted for circumstances, and as a result,00:03:53
our engineers eliminate or00:03:56
minimize such and unforeseen00:03:59
accidents;00:04:00
however, the more complex the system, the more00:04:04
such errors creep in, but among the ocean of00:04:08
such ordinary errors,00:04:11
there are still extremely extraordinary and00:04:15
still inexplicable ones, and here for the first time we00:04:19
begin to see the connection, a direct connection between00:04:23
philosophy and the exact sciences, and the00:04:27
connection is so direct that it is simply00:04:30
amazing, and the whole point is that in00:04:33
fact we blind in the literal sense of00:04:36
the word, everything we know about nature is the00:04:41
result of the experience of statistical00:04:43
accumulation of data and then their00:04:47
analysis, and this is where philosophy plays the main role.00:04:53
Imagination, if you want,00:04:56
philosophy provides a basis for the accumulated00:05:00
facts, paints a picture of what is happening in the00:05:03
heads of scientists and engineers00:05:06
Thus, armed with this basic00:05:09
assumption and00:05:10
picture, the thought of an00:05:13
engineer, a physicist, a mathematician, a chemist begins to work, and as00:05:17
a result they produce a formula for the00:05:20
interactions of various natural forces00:05:22
or chemical elements, for example,00:05:25
to make it clear how it works,00:05:28
let’s not go far, let’s give an example,00:05:31
well, electricity is the philosophical basis that00:05:34
explains it to us behavior is based00:05:37
on an analogy with water and the flow through00:05:40
pipes, and in most cases it00:05:43
works and such an understanding is quite00:05:46
sufficient, which is why in the lower00:05:49
grades when talking about electricity,00:05:52
such an analogy is drawn, and the word00:05:54
god itself seems to hint that00:05:57
something flows through the wires; this is philosophy allows us to make00:06:01
full use of electricity in all00:06:04
areas of our lives, but there is one thing, but00:06:09
even in the second, more pragmatic00:06:11
approximation, you understand that current has little in00:06:15
common with water,00:06:17
firstly, it doesn’t flow or run anywhere, it00:06:20
just exists, it doesn’t have a00:06:23
flow speed, for example, but it does tension and00:06:26
strength, and already at this stage the00:06:29
majority cease to understand that00:06:33
we have a bunch of examples of their dependence on00:06:37
each other, formulas by which we00:06:40
skillfully manage both, but the00:06:44
basic understanding is already beginning to00:06:46
limp, okay, check allowed00:06:49
us to step over this and was00:06:52
compiled a narrower base platform00:06:54
and now those who work with electrics00:06:57
understand that the example with water is not suitable,00:07:00
however, there are formulas and diagrams memorized00:07:04
by heart and we continue to use00:07:07
electricity, but the further into the forest the00:07:10
thicker the partisans00:07:12
delving into the topic even further we understand00:07:16
that there is a phase -zero00:07:18
potential difference induction resistance00:07:21
magnetic field alternating magnetic field00:07:24
statics and so on and so forth and in the00:07:27
end we reach the limit and00:07:30
understand that00:07:33
charge is somehow magically transmitted through the wires, exactly00:07:37
what Michael Faraday said in the mid-00:07:40
19th century, that is it turns out that in00:07:43
fact we have been marking time in one place for 200 years00:07:46
and we know nothing about the charge except00:07:51
that it exists and is measured in some way00:07:54
and then it turns out that it can be00:07:56
transmitted without wires at all, everything is a00:07:59
dead end beyond the philosophical base there is no more00:08:04
there is only separate pieces that00:08:08
clearly explain this or that effect no, of course,00:08:12
this does not prevent us from continuing to00:08:14
use electricity and creating00:08:16
more and more complex devices, but00:08:20
the understanding of the whole picture is no longer there, and without00:08:24
it it is impossible to create a formula for00:08:28
our happiness or misfortune; at this00:08:30
level, the problem is already being dealt with by scientists and00:08:33
these people are so smart and00:08:37
specially trained that00:08:41
they no longer need a philosophy of complete understanding for00:08:44
each specific case, they compose00:08:47
their own small piece of the base00:08:50
and, starting from it, create formulas, and00:08:53
if this is impossible, then they simply write00:08:57
the rules and learn them by heart, for example the00:09:00
law of electromagnetic induction is00:09:02
still the same Faraday, but even for him00:09:05
there are various explanations about an00:09:08
observer moving along with a certain00:09:11
point who sees a change in the00:09:13
magnetic field, some also00:09:16
provide a comparison of the same water00:09:18
running through pipes, while we do not know00:09:21
what charge is or what00:09:24
magnetic is field, but in this castrated00:09:26
philosophy, a person seems to see a field,00:09:29
sees how rain is coming through a pipe and the00:09:33
like, this explanation is castrated00:09:36
not because I want to offend someone, but00:09:38
because it is really cut off,00:09:40
only a small piece of the picture is only00:09:44
for the understanding of the student so that the person00:09:47
begins to understand then, when the understanding is00:09:50
firmly fixed in the student’s head,00:09:53
he will be told that no flow00:09:55
actually occurs through the magnetic field, but00:09:58
by that time he will have already forgotten the00:10:00
initial explanation and, as00:10:03
arguments in any dispute or00:10:05
research, he will repeat about00:10:08
Faraday’s law of induction,00:10:09
I think that this is exactly what is00:10:12
proof, but in order for a00:10:15
person to understand and accept this knowledge,00:10:19
at least at the learning stage, he still00:10:21
needs a picture and this task00:10:25
is performed by the humanitarian component,00:10:28
so you see, they find themselves without philosophy without a00:10:33
basic understanding00:10:34
without a picture in the head, exact science00:10:37
cannot develop in any way but an accurate00:10:40
understanding For00:10:43
some reason we still don’t have a picture of the universe; we just have these00:10:46
crutches that simply close gaping00:10:51
holes in knowledge, just so that people don’t00:10:53
ask unnecessary questions and move on.00:10:57
Let me once again show with an example the00:10:59
difference between what we really00:11:02
understand and philosophical crutches00:11:06
the number pi we know exactly what it is and00:11:10
what it represents in our universe is00:11:14
simply the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its00:11:17
diameter and everything in our entire universe in00:11:22
any number system in any language and00:11:25
in any civilization it will be the same00:11:29
is three integers 14 1592 6 and so on,00:11:35
maybe later scientists are trying to00:11:37
figure out this number to the billionth00:11:41
decimal place00:11:42
because this is one of the few pieces of knowledge00:11:45
that we know and understand, just00:11:48
exactly,00:11:49
or the sum of the angles of a triangle00:11:53
will always be equal to 180 degrees, although00:11:58
this is more complicated in different00:12:00
reference systems the quantity may change, but00:12:04
the principle will definitely be the same angles,00:12:08
just the sum of all angles will be equal to the00:12:11
level and full rotation around its00:12:14
axis, everything is everywhere in the universe in whatever00:12:19
is measured in degrees, grams, dollars00:12:22
or hours in any number system,00:12:25
this is what accurate scientific data looks like and00:12:30
when we look at the Pythagorean theorem, we00:12:33
know exactly why each of the variables is in the formula00:12:38
and what exactly it expresses00:12:41
Part 2 the world is not a shadow of it,00:12:46
but the more we delve into knowledge,00:12:49
the less obvious such an expression becomes,00:12:54
yes, we have a picture compiled by00:12:57
philosophers back in 18 and the 19th centuries that00:13:02
each atom is made of a neutron proton00:13:05
and electrons rushing around them at crazy00:13:07
speed, but even then science was00:13:11
moving in this area by touch, without00:13:14
any ability to see atoms, scientists00:13:18
and philosophers built models, trying them on to00:13:22
match the formulas already calculated00:13:25
experimentally This is how our modern worldview developed in the end,00:13:28
yes, it00:13:33
seems to us that it is very similar to the truth00:13:37
because it works, we have already seen00:13:40
photographs of atoms obtained using00:13:42
electron microscopes,00:13:44
but they are quite fuzzy, and in00:13:49
1990 we get a scanning tunneling00:13:52
microscope, a00:13:54
miracle of scientific thought, according to the00:13:56
statement of engineers. can not only00:14:00
clearly see each individual atom, but00:14:03
even move their very atoms, and00:14:07
to prove this possibility00:14:10
they made the IBM logo00:14:14
from thirty-five xenon atoms and00:14:17
photographed it, look00:14:20
how great it looks00:14:23
[music]00:14:24
enjoyed the triumph of the creative thought of00:14:27
geniuses now let’s look at this00:14:30
photo in more detail, let’s assume that these00:14:33
photos are genuine, especially since I myself00:14:37
sincerely hope so, first let’s look at the00:14:41
xenon atoms themselves, they are clearly visible in00:14:45
every photo and here we experience 100:14:50
culture shock,00:14:51
each xenon atom has the shape of a drop with a00:14:56
sharp cone on top, this is what the00:14:59
most ordinary drop of, say,00:15:02
tin solder usually looks like on any microcircuit, but00:15:06
not there because it is not a molecule, an00:15:09
individual atom which, by definition,00:15:12
should be an ideal sphere because its00:15:16
boundaries are formed by an electron smeared in00:15:18
time and space00:15:21
rotating around a proton at a speed of00:15:24
several billion revolutions per second00:15:27
at such a speed to form figures with00:15:30
sharp corners,00:15:32
sorry, I don’t believe it, an oval of course can00:15:35
be obtained due to a shift in the00:15:37
eccentricity of the orbit, but a bonus, and even00:15:42
with roughness on the surface, but00:15:46
that’s not all,00:15:48
according to the statement, these atoms were00:15:51
laid out on a nickel00:15:54
substrate. we see, what about nickel,00:15:59
look, and there, according to the00:16:01
chemists themselves, xenon is difficult to measure, because under00:16:05
different measurement conditions it gives different00:16:08
sizes, but in general its radius ranges00:16:11
from 170 to 218 meters, and then the nickel00:16:16
on which our letters lie has a radius00:16:20
of 115 to 125 and k meters but only two00:16:25
times less than a xenon atom, which means00:16:28
that in the photo we should see not just a00:16:32
substrate, but clear nickel atoms, you00:16:37
see them, I don’t,00:16:39
so what do we actually see, of00:16:42
course the first thing that comes to mind is a00:16:45
fake and the00:16:46
interested parties are clearly visible,00:16:49
first of all, the company itself to both and00:16:52
other large electronics manufacturers,00:16:54
but what if the photo is real, especially since the00:16:58
work with a scanning tunneling00:17:00
microscope and the movement of individual00:17:03
atoms does not stop, you can find on00:17:06
the Internet much more recent photos and00:17:09
videos from such manipulations are now being drawn a00:17:13
much more complex picture00:17:15
of people, but the strange appearance of00:17:19
the atoms remains,00:17:21
they are still slightly cone-shaped00:17:24
like a droplet, and now00:17:27
something else has been added to them, now we see the00:17:31
atoms on the substrate, but the way we00:17:35
see them amazes even more they are hidden by00:17:38
some kind of layer as if the water is only barely00:17:42
guessing that00:17:45
there is something else under the surface of this semi-liquid layer, and00:17:48
at some distance from the created00:17:50
figure we see a depression in the shape of the00:17:54
same figure that repeats its00:17:56
outline, as if circles on the water or00:18:00
as if the figure was softly sunk into viscous00:18:03
structure, but there shouldn’t be anything like that,00:18:07
we should only see atoms,00:18:10
what kind of water is okay, let’s assume that these are00:18:13
focusing errors, but you must agree that00:18:17
the worm of doubt is already starting to gnaw at what it is00:18:20
that we see in fact, all00:18:24
these crows and irregular shapes of atoms00:18:27
are explained, we just see this00:18:29
image not with our eyes00:18:32
scanning microscope and00:18:35
both tunnel and atomic force microscopy touch00:18:39
the surface with the help of a00:18:41
special probe cantilever; it is a00:18:44
kind of needle or waveguide; further,00:18:48
there are slight differences in the method of obtaining00:18:50
images;00:18:51
for example, in atomic force microscopy, a00:18:59
laser reflected from the rear mirror surface of the cantilever is used a beam that reads the slightest00:19:02
change in the position of the mirror and does not00:19:05
transmit each of its positions to a00:19:07
position-sensitive LED,00:19:10
in other words, we do not see what is00:19:13
actually there, we create some kind of00:19:16
imaginary picture00:19:18
obtained by feeling;00:19:22
moreover, in tunnel microscopes there is no contact with the00:19:25
object under study as such at all00:19:29
between the studied a00:19:33
constant current flows between the atom and the cantilever probe, and00:19:37
based on changes in the current, an image is formed.00:19:39
On the one hand, everything is00:19:42
quite simple. On the other hand, we00:19:46
understand that this is actually a world of shadows.00:19:50
The question arises: what do we actually00:19:55
see? As a result, the cantilever count cannot00:19:59
be a picture of what is00:20:01
under the atom and even from the side since its00:20:06
manipulations are limited to one degree of00:20:09
freedom00:20:10
from top to bottom and a little to the side, and the00:20:14
same picture that we see on00:20:17
the Internet is compiled programmatically00:20:20
based on the readings of the probe in each00:20:24
pixel, this is a rather long process and as you already00:20:28
guessed it,00:20:29
the program adds a lot of its own00:20:32
edits in accordance with the generally accepted00:20:35
theory, but even after that the image00:20:38
turns out to have fuzzy edges and it is00:20:41
additionally corrected00:20:44
in photo editors00:20:46
to make it clear what this world00:20:49
of shadows is,00:20:51
imagine that you are sitting in front of the table00:20:54
blindfolded,00:20:56
you can feel the surface of the table00:20:59
with your hand, but it too only one and a00:21:02
half degrees of freedom00:21:05
is acceptable because it is completely00:21:07
plastered, rewound with bandages and00:21:11
straightened using a straight shelf inside the00:21:13
plaster, you feel the surface of the table and00:21:17
come across a ball with your hand. The more00:21:20
sensitive and thinner your hand is, the00:21:24
more accurate the picture you will get, but what00:21:28
exactly is this ball? hidden from you it00:21:32
could be an apple, or it could be a00:21:34
billiard ball, it could be a small00:21:36
watermelon, or it could be a gay globe or a paper00:21:41
ball, it could be colored or black,00:21:44
monolithic or composite, whatever you want, you do00:21:48
n’t see it, all your information00:21:52
boils down to the fact that it’s probably still a00:21:55
sphere and that’s it, now imagine00:22:00
that you feel the surface not just with a00:22:03
plastered hand, but with just one00:22:06
finger from this hand; perhaps this is not a00:22:09
very good example, but it is clear from it00:22:12
that most likely you will draw up a picture00:22:16
about this object based solely on00:22:19
the data that you have and any you will either simply not notice new00:22:23
data that goes beyond the scope of your knowledge00:22:26
or you00:22:30
will begin to interpret it by pulling it by the00:22:32
ears to your philosophical base,00:22:35
but if there is something there that is not at all00:22:38
imaginable, then in this way you00:22:42
will never know it and all this will not00:22:45
prevent you from using the item you00:22:47
can take laying it on another00:22:51
similar one and building a figure out of them,00:22:54
passing current or stuffing in a bit of other00:22:58
information, all this will be possible, but it will hardly bring you any closer to00:23:02
understanding what exactly you are using, moreover,00:23:08
if your goals are fulfilled without00:23:11
interference, but for example if you want to00:23:13
lay out a figure from balls and you don’t00:23:17
need to change your picture of the world,00:23:19
what difference does it make if you lay it out from00:23:23
tennis balls or round glass00:23:26
bulbs, or maybe change globes or00:23:29
round bricks, it doesn’t matter00:23:32
the goal has been achieved and the work is being done00:23:36
to change the picture of the world,00:23:39
philosophy needs to reach a critical point00:23:42
the level of contradictions between it and00:23:45
reality, in fact, we have long00:23:49
crossed this barrier, but00:23:55
ideologists and humanists no longer even00:23:58
try to call for further elaboration of the picture of the world, because sooner or later humanities scholars00:24:01
always come to the idea of00:24:04
ether, and scientists, for some unknown00:24:07
reason, have this option but it is completely unsuitable;00:24:11
quantum physics was invented,00:24:13
consisting of continuous scraps of crutches00:24:17
and assumptions contradicting each other;00:24:20
however, we have already talked about this and will00:24:23
talk more than once, but now we come to the main00:24:26
topic of this video;00:24:27
everything that I just said above was00:24:31
said for the sole purpose of00:24:33
showing that firstly, any working00:24:38
formulas will continue00:24:41
to work properly regardless of the degree of our00:24:44
understanding of this world, it’s like in the example with00:24:47
trees and the wind, it doesn’t matter whether00:24:52
you think that the trees with their swaying Steve00:24:55
give rise to the wind or, on the contrary, the wind00:24:58
sways the leaves, all formulas relating to00:25:02
the swaying of leaves and the winds will be00:25:05
the same for both views of the world,00:25:09
however, if you want to explore this world00:25:12
beyond your forest, you will have to change your00:25:16
ideology and make sure that it is the wind that00:25:20
moves the leaves, they are the other way around, otherwise you00:25:23
simply will not be able to, for example,00:25:24
travel by sail on the sea, although you00:25:27
probably can, but you will be sure that00:25:31
where -far beyond the ocean grow00:25:34
giant trees with leaves00:25:37
several kilometers in diameter, which are00:25:40
created by a wind so strong that it00:25:43
blows into the sea, which is why understanding where00:25:46
certain00:25:50
numbers and values come from in formulas is so important to00:25:55
understand what this or that00:25:58
variable in the formula expresses, why in it is00:26:01
exactly this number and no other, but in00:26:05
some perfectly working formulas,00:26:08
some numbers express literally00:26:12
unknown what,00:26:14
but it doesn’t happen like that00:26:16
I’m ahead of a non-constant constant,00:26:22
as you probably already guessed, I00:26:25
mean the formula for calculating the gravitational force00:26:27
between two objects in the classical00:26:30
Newtonian version, this is force the force00:26:33
of gravity is written with this00:26:36
formula and almost everything in it is quite00:26:40
clear, let's try to calculate it00:26:44
not in mathematics but in simple00:26:47
Russian, so the Mars of the first object is00:26:52
multiplied by the mass of the second why it is00:26:55
by multiplication that they add up and explain00:26:58
quite easily two bodies are at a00:27:02
distance from each other which means the mass of00:27:05
one object completely influences00:27:09
each individual atom of another object with00:27:12
all its full force, therefore their masses do00:27:16
not add up but are multiplied by each00:27:19
other, with this it is clear that further these objects are00:27:23
separated by a certain distance, it is logical that00:27:27
the further the distance the less00:27:30
impact therefore resulting from00:27:33
the multiplication mass force needs to be00:27:36
divided by distance, more precisely the square of00:27:39
the distance, this happens according to the00:27:41
inverse square law;00:27:43
this law describes the distribution of00:27:47
certain forces or energies within a certain00:27:50
clinical space,00:27:53
so we get a decoding of the00:27:56
form of gravity, the mass of the first object00:28:00
multiplied by the mass of the second and00:28:03
divided by the square of the distance between00:28:06
them everything seems to be correct, but they haven’t00:28:10
forgotten anything, and even00:28:12
this doesn’t work, but how come00:28:17
we correctly introduced this is the same00:28:20
Newton’s formula that describes the law of00:28:23
universal gravitation,00:28:25
let’s figure it out first, yes, this is00:28:29
exactly it and we00:28:32
interpreted it absolutely correctly, so00:28:35
if it doesn’t work, which means either it is00:28:38
not correct in itself or we forgot to00:28:41
take into account some variable and00:28:43
indeed modern calculations in00:28:46
this formula contain one more00:28:49
value, the so-called gravitational00:28:52
constant00:28:53
by which you need to multiply the00:28:56
result obtained and then everything converges and00:28:59
starts working, but Newton never I00:29:03
didn’t write about it and never added it to00:29:06
my formula, where did it come from,00:29:10
they are00:29:12
known, the exact moment of its00:29:14
appearance in the formula is not known, not its author, it just00:29:18
somehow appeared by itself, there is only00:29:21
an assumption that it appeared perhaps00:29:25
at the beginning of the nineteenth century, and00:29:27
again it is possible introduced by the French00:29:31
physicist Freemason in his treatise on00:29:33
mechanics in00:29:34
1809, but this is not at all accurate00:29:38
since the discovery itself was not covered in any way,00:29:40
and the dream already took it for00:29:44
granted,00:29:47
and before the appearance of this variable00:29:50
formula of universal gravitation,00:29:52
many articles were already written and00:29:55
many videos were filmed, therefore I will not00:29:57
focus my attention now on this00:29:59
story, which is certainly interesting and00:30:01
requires a separate video, but now we are00:30:04
interested in something else. You and I have clearly00:30:08
defined what each of the00:30:11
variables in the formula means, why they are needed there and00:30:14
what the worldview expresses here, how00:30:18
ideology works, the perception00:30:22
of the world is correct, but the formula doesn’t work, but00:30:26
suddenly a mysterious variable appears out of nowhere00:30:29
and the formula starts working with it,00:30:32
but we have no idea what00:30:35
exactly this number 6 point 67400:30:40
thousandths expresses, and so on, let’s try to00:30:43
figure it out first, as we00:30:46
see it’s quite strange, if00:30:49
not nightmare dimension, that is,00:30:52
this variable is measured not in newtons,00:30:55
not in kilograms, not in meters, its00:30:58
dimension is a certain volume with mass and00:31:01
speed, it’s something wild that in our00:31:05
world can have such a terrible00:31:08
dimension, the question is by no means an idle one,00:31:12
because how do we see all the other00:31:14
variables the formula of gravitation is absolutely00:31:17
clear, but only how their00:31:19
relationships are clear, I will lend you, but there is something that,00:31:22
on the one hand, exists00:31:25
and has a decisive role both on the00:31:28
interaction between objects and on the00:31:30
formula itself and performance, on the00:31:33
other hand, this is not what it00:31:36
definitely is, but we also do00:31:38
n’t see it in a certain way, which is why00:31:40
initially it was not00:31:44
included in the formula and in the morning I simply didn’t see00:31:47
this nothing just like we still do,00:31:50
however, from the formula it turns out that this nothing is00:31:54
not just comprehensive, but also constantly00:31:58
everywhere throughout the universe, the00:32:01
units of measurement of this something consists of00:32:05
mass, volume and velocity,00:32:07
the only thing that fits this00:32:09
definition00:32:10
is space itself,00:32:13
space itself, which seems to be empty and therefore00:32:16
the vacuum was not taken into account, but only the00:32:20
addition of the formula of gravitation and the00:32:22
gravitational constant makes the background a00:32:25
really working00:32:27
name for this, it has long been known since the00:32:31
youth it existed00:32:33
at the same time there were two views of the universe in00:32:36
one it was empty and in the other it was00:32:38
filled and the firms were offended as we know00:32:41
the point of view about space as empty00:32:44
space in a vacuum, but at the same time00:32:47
the formula did not work and it was the ether,00:32:50
more precisely its numerical value expressed00:32:54
in the gravitational constant, that allowed00:32:56
make the formula of universal gravitation00:32:59
a working one, the very definition of ether00:33:02
was taken out of brackets so as not to be an eyesore, and so it00:33:05
turned out to be a working formula00:33:08
where all the meanings are understandable and clear a100:33:11
meanings are hidden behind a certain number and so we00:33:15
figured out the concepts,00:33:17
leaving the words ether instead of vague numbers,00:33:20
we begin to understand the meaning of the00:33:23
action that occurs in the formula, but00:33:27
still it is still not completely clear, this00:33:30
state of the ether is expressed by this number and we00:33:34
remind you that now we are talking about00:33:36
gravity, the mutual attraction of bodies in00:33:40
this formula, the main dimensions00:33:43
are the distance between the bodies and their00:33:45
mass,00:33:46
however the space between bodies is not00:33:49
empty, it is filled with ether, and since00:33:53
mass and volume are integral00:33:56
components of the gravitational constant, it is00:33:59
logical to conclude that this00:34:02
number expresses a certain density of00:34:05
space in a given volume. The concept of00:34:08
gravity now comes into place and the concept of gravity as a00:34:11
compaction of space that, like a00:34:14
funnel, begins to collect and roll into the00:34:16
matter surrounding ourselves, yes, we know that00:34:20
the example of balls on a stretched canvas has long been00:34:23
actively being exhausted from everywhere as00:34:26
incorrect, perhaps even unprovable, and00:34:30
or not, we have seen three-dimensional00:34:33
models of space curvature many times,00:34:36
at least creating them on a computer is not00:34:38
at all difficult, and00:34:41
don’t betray any pictures there the geometry in general00:34:43
of Lobachev's Rome is built on the00:34:46
possibility of curvature of space00:34:49
again and again we see the shadow of some00:34:52
magical forces that here and there00:34:56
unobtrusively manifest themselves, I try to00:34:59
remain in the shadow as much as possible, but at the00:35:02
same time I accidentally slip in the correct00:35:04
variable formula for gravitational00:35:06
attraction,00:35:07
they will come up with Cavendish sets of routine00:35:10
scales and all the time he constantly persistently00:35:14
takes our eyes away from the ether, maybe I’m00:35:18
exaggerating00:35:19
and wishful thinking,00:35:21
let’s check if space00:35:25
really consists of ether a little00:35:28
more than entirely00:35:29
and the formula for the gravitational constant00:35:31
expresses its density, is there00:35:34
a way to check this, we00:35:37
know that the gravitational constant but00:35:39
this is a rather strange quantity, on the one00:35:42
hand, it is considered one of the00:35:45
Planck units, that is, the basic units00:35:47
of measurement in the universe, this is the speed of00:35:50
light, the Dirac constant, a strange plank, a00:35:53
strange elephant fight, and the00:35:56
gravitational constant itself,00:35:58
from these quantities all00:36:00
other quantities in the universe are added up, and00:36:04
from all of the above An00:36:07
unprepared person can immediately understand00:36:09
only the speed of light and now apparently the00:36:12
gravitational constant, while the00:36:14
remaining quantities are reliably hidden under00:36:17
some names. On the other hand,00:36:20
although the gravitational constant is the constant, for some reason it is00:36:24
still not possible to reliably catch its exact value with00:36:29
each new measurement with a new device and with a00:36:32
new team they give a new value and00:36:36
this is the most interesting thing, it’s00:36:39
amazing that the error in00:36:41
the measurement is so great that we00:36:44
still cannot clarify the number even to the00:36:47
third decimal place, that is,00:36:50
mathematical engineers are creating00:36:53
newer and more complex instruments for00:36:55
measuring the gravitational constant00:36:57
they remove from the research area everything unnecessary00:37:00
that can affect the results,00:37:03
including random magnetic fields and00:37:05
even air. It goes without saying that when creating a00:37:09
device or installation, engineers carefully00:37:12
calculate the tolerances and know exactly such an00:37:16
error in measurements can be,00:37:18
however, the error each time00:37:21
exceeds the permissible limits and does not just00:37:24
to some values and to different values,00:37:27
both in one direction and the other, is it00:37:30
really possible00:37:32
that over the course of decades and hundreds of00:37:36
measurements, errors are consistently produced that00:37:39
exceed all permissible limits,00:37:43
something doesn’t add up here, let’s00:37:46
look at the measurement graph and the00:37:49
results obtained not with a blurred00:37:52
look from a long distance, so00:37:54
to speak, the main value was found by00:37:57
Henry Corey the Lower in00:37:59
1798, it does not change, it is equal to 6.67,00:38:06
so we will not look at it, we will00:38:08
only pay our attention to the third and00:38:11
fourth digits after the decimal point,00:38:14
they cannot be caught in any way and so00:38:18
measurements in00:38:20
1982 give us the figure 25 measurements00:38:25
taken 14 years later in00:38:28
1996 showed the value 29 another00:38:32
year later almost 40 three years later 4300:38:36
another year 55 another year 42 and a00:38:41
half and another year later 38 two00:38:46
years later 22 more years later year 43 in 2009 35 in00:38:53
2010 24 each time the measurement was carried out with a00:38:59
different permissible error, but00:39:03
each time the real error went00:39:06
far beyond the permissible limits, however,00:39:10
look at it from the outside,00:39:13
it doesn’t remind you of anything, yes, this is a00:39:17
wave graph, we see with our own eyes the00:39:22
compression and stretching of the density of the00:39:25
space of the ether in the time00:39:27
range,00:39:28
I think that scientists came to similar00:39:31
conclusions and in 2014 they carried out00:39:35
several measurements at once in different laboratories00:39:37
around the world, the results were again00:39:40
different from 19 to 5 10 5 within a year,00:39:45
what does this mean, that either I’m wrong and there’s00:39:49
something here? then it’s completely different, or in compression and00:39:52
expansion, space moves much00:39:55
faster than once every 10 years; for this, it00:39:58
is necessary to carry out measurements in the00:40:00
same installation throughout the year, but they00:40:03
appeared and as a result of continuous00:40:07
measurements from 2015 to00:40:11
2018 were also obtained from wave-like00:40:14
results, although the instruments were located near the world00:40:18
and the same in the same00:40:20
laboratory,00:40:22
you can read the material on this study in the00:40:24
source, this is the magazine evening issue dated August 29,00:40:29
2018, the article is called00:40:32
measurement of the gravitational constant by00:40:34
two independent methods,00:40:38
of course, before making a statement00:40:40
about measuring changes in the density of the00:40:43
space of the ether, scientists need to00:40:46
remove any other options; in particular, in00:40:49
one of the experiments,00:40:50
they explain the daily change in the00:40:53
readings of the device by the aging of the fibers of a00:40:56
specially made quartz00:40:58
fiber used in the experiment;00:41:01
nevertheless, it is not possible to explain the00:41:04
overall picture with such frequent cases, as in00:41:09
my opinion it does not work out this way In this way,00:41:12
our science again and again comes head-on00:41:15
with the existence of the ether; it’s00:41:19
no longer just about inventing new00:41:21
crutches to close the gaping gap in00:41:25
knowledge, and at the same time, I think00:41:29
everyone is asking the question, why00:41:32
hide the existence of the ether so carefully,00:41:35
who did it interfere with, in fact, the answer to00:41:40
this the question of monstrous growth and licking is00:41:43
literally on the surface, but00:41:46
let’s talk about this in one of the following00:41:48
videos00:41:54
[music]00:42:09
[music]00:42:20
[music]Description:
Вы на канале Эпоха Недоверия! В этом ролике я расскажу о мире теней, в котором живет современная наука, а также о гравитации в частности. Хм... получилось опять не хайпово. Тем не менее советую посмотреть! Будет интересно! Приятного просмотра! _________________________________________________________________________________________________ на мороженое кидать сюда: карта сбербанк 4276 4000 4879 3856 Помочь деньгами: https://boosty.to/nedoverye поддержать в сообществе вк https://vk.com/club188168702 поддержать в DonationAlerts https://www.donationalerts.com/r/epoha_nedoveryia канал Эпоха Недоверия в Рутубе https://rutube.ru/u/epohanedoverya/ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ТЕЛЕГА ТУТ https://t.me/epoha_nedoverya 00:00 Интро 01:36 Введение 01:56 Лирики и Физики 12:41 Мир Теней 26:17 Непостоянная Постоянная 41:11 Эфир 41:49 Титры
Preparing download options
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира" video?
http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "Непостоянная постоянная. Гравитационная постоянная доказывает существование Эфира"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.