background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru"

input logo icon
Video tags
|

Video tags

институт
госзакупок
www.roszakupki.ru
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:01
already talked about it, and a
00:00:04
contract is essentially what
00:00:07
everything is for, and the fact that we have procurements
00:00:10
carried out, which should logically lead us
00:00:12
to
00:00:14
choosing a counterparty to concluding a
00:00:17
contract for execution, and of course, purchasing the
00:00:19
necessary products,
00:00:22
contracts the concept is quite
00:00:24
broad and in general the legal regulation of
00:00:27
configuration issues in Federal
00:00:29
Law 44 is very voluminous, perhaps probably
00:00:32
the most comprehensive of all the rules
00:00:34
that exist for all the obligations
00:00:36
that we fulfill, you
00:00:38
and I have traditionally analyzed the
00:00:41
main block, the one that is important,
00:00:44
most of us will most likely need it, and
00:00:46
accordingly, some individual
00:00:47
questions, if they are of a private nature, we
00:00:50
will talk to you
00:00:52
about the provision that
00:00:55
is provided for by law and about the basic one
00:00:57
under the law q that we will need
00:00:59
with which most of us will work.
00:01:00
Again, of course, there are a number of
00:01:03
features recently, one force
00:01:05
certain for economic
00:01:07
features until recently and
00:01:10
now there are a lot of concepts of ideas on how
00:01:14
to regulate what, so
00:01:16
most likely we are waiting for some kind of large package of
00:01:18
new amendments because it is necessary to buy in
00:01:22
stages, it is not clear what is happening with
00:01:25
production, there are some questions and
00:01:27
so on, so now
00:01:29
this one is gradually being escalated I’m
00:01:32
constantly looking at the moment and I see that a lot
00:01:34
of different proposals are coming in,
00:01:36
to the point that yesterday wax
00:01:38
made a proposal that
00:01:40
further amendments are needed in the mass 95 of this article
00:01:42
on contracts, what to do with it in
00:01:44
order to somehow resolve the issue of
00:01:46
execution of those contracts that have already
00:01:48
been concluded, and now
00:01:50
difficulties arise with the implementation of civil
00:01:52
legislation there, they also introduced a
00:01:55
draft amendment to the State Duma in the State Duma, which
00:01:59
will partially affect in
00:02:00
this block also the actual purchases and
00:02:02
ours, because at certain points
00:02:05
we are also guided by the provisions of
00:02:08
civil legislation, so well,
00:02:10
sort of there is a lot of things that are
00:02:12
happening now with contracts, so I would
00:02:14
probably recommend also keeping an eye on it
00:02:15
because we have completed the course and
00:02:18
then you will most likely leave
00:02:21
here and there will be a lot of other
00:02:23
issues related to regulation,
00:02:24
so don’t lose sight of
00:02:26
what will most likely happen -some amendments because there are a
00:02:28
lot of draft proposals now
00:02:30
being received, which one will work and is right
00:02:32
on the money,
00:02:35
but in general, yes, this is the basic concept from
00:02:38
which everything is built in the forty-fourth
00:02:40
federal law there are three such
00:02:42
basic rules that relate to
00:02:43
contracts and of course a lot of
00:02:45
different details which are scattered and in
00:02:48
general throughout the law, also which
00:02:50
directly relate to contracts, that
00:02:53
for contracts, this article 34 is
00:02:55
called a contract, and it essentially
00:02:58
talks about how to draw it up, what
00:03:00
provisions should or can
00:03:02
be included in it, and what we must
00:03:05
ensure that before a purchase is
00:03:08
announced, what standards should we
00:03:10
take into account, including during procurement, you and
00:03:12
the supplier, and there are specifics there and so on,
00:03:14
that is, but this is sort of a general
00:03:16
basis, the basis of what the contract
00:03:18
is, and then we have Article
00:03:22
94 which talks about the execution
00:03:25
of contracts, yes, that is, directly
00:03:26
how this thing all happens, and
00:03:29
Article 95 is the termination and
00:03:32
amendment of a contract, yes, that is, as if
00:03:35
in the main such block, that is, what it is,
00:03:37
how it is composed,
00:03:39
how to execute it, and what it means to practically
00:03:42
close it
00:03:43
change these are the main blocks,
00:03:46
among other things, there are a number of related
00:03:48
provisions, a number of articles that are also
00:03:50
complex, article 96 on ensuring the
00:03:55
execution of the contract, to what they
00:03:57
leave as
00:03:59
they are introduced, and nothing else, how to work with it,
00:04:03
then the next one, yes, there is provision 3 of the
00:04:07
article on terminological what In
00:04:09
general, in general, a contract as a term
00:04:12
is represented by Article 45 about independent
00:04:16
guarantees, and the first one to write is about
00:04:18
concluding a contract using electronic
00:04:20
procedures, that is, there are a lot of different
00:04:22
points, we will try to sort out the main ones,
00:04:24
but again,
00:04:26
we won’t let go of our hand after a while, because most likely somehow
00:04:29
then the related reference norms
00:04:31
will one way or another, when preparing the
00:04:33
draft of this document, be carried throughout
00:04:35
44 federal laws, in the best case,
00:04:37
to the worst case, you will still have to
00:04:40
analyze a bunch of by-laws about the
00:04:41
monitor, what we now see
00:04:44
on the slide, yes, this is the basis for what
00:04:47
it all starts with terminology and in fact
00:04:49
we have two terms directly
00:04:53
about the contract and then there are several more
00:04:55
new terms, different types of
00:04:58
contracts, let’s generally look at
00:05:00
what in terminological terms back and
00:05:03
captivity means what a contract is before the
00:05:06
term state or municipal
00:05:08
contract or civil - a legal
00:05:11
contract the subject of which is the
00:05:12
supply of goods, performance of work and
00:05:14
provision of services, including the
00:05:16
acquisition of real estate or
00:05:19
lease, and which are concluded by a budgetary
00:05:21
institution, a
00:05:22
unitary enterprise or other legal entities
00:05:25
under delegated powers within the framework of
00:05:27
Article 44, Article 15 of the Federal Law, that is,
00:05:30
if disassembled into its component parts this
00:05:32
wording, yes, we see that we have
00:05:35
several types of contracts, and that is, a
00:05:37
state contract, a municipal
00:05:39
contract and a
00:05:40
civil law contract of a budgetary
00:05:43
institution,
00:05:44
this feature is directly related
00:05:46
to the status of the customer milks the first day in
00:05:49
discussed with colleagues that
00:05:51
not all customers who work on 44
00:05:55
federal law is
00:05:56
state or municipal
00:05:58
customers, there is a certain category of
00:06:01
persons who are not customers, who, based on the
00:06:03
results of all their nooks and crannies, conclude but
00:06:05
in fact a civil law agreement
00:06:07
or contract simply without the prefix, the word
00:06:10
state or municipal, just a
00:06:13
contract, in this case, in essence, these are
00:06:15
all those who it works either under
00:06:18
delegated powers or is a
00:06:20
budgetary and it is a unitary
00:06:22
enterprise, but if this is a
00:06:25
gradation and here we are more specific, then we
00:06:28
will see the same 3 articles before the next
00:06:31
term that follows it in order, what
00:06:33
is a state
00:06:35
municipal contract? a special
00:06:38
case, that is, there is a general concept,
00:06:40
collectively, a contract, and a special
00:06:42
case of this to understand is a
00:06:44
state municipal contract,
00:06:45
which, in turn, is also a
00:06:48
civil law contract, but
00:06:50
it is concluded on behalf of the Russian
00:06:52
Federation, a subject of the Russian Federation
00:06:54
or a municipal entity, that is,
00:06:56
in essence, respectively, those customers
00:07:00
who are
00:07:01
absolutely probably
00:07:04
absolutely correct, yes the wording is
00:07:06
more clear, yes, that is, the state
00:07:08
municipal contract is essentially pbs,
00:07:11
that is, recipients of budget funds at
00:07:13
any level, that is, these are government
00:07:15
institutions 1 subordinate bodies and
00:07:18
authorities subordinate to them
00:07:20
government institutions
00:07:21
with in other cases it’s actually
00:07:24
simple a contract before evian, a
00:07:26
civil contract, in
00:07:28
fact, on the one hand, this
00:07:29
terminology contract is equal to a
00:07:31
civil contract, but it is
00:07:33
relative because it is not always possible
00:07:35
in such a standard concept of a contract to
00:07:39
say that the contract that we
00:07:41
conclude on 44 is the same thing but
00:07:43
the problem is at least that the
00:07:46
main principle of a civil law
00:07:48
contract is the equality of the parties to the
00:07:52
contract and the parties to the war, as a general
00:07:56
rule, regulate their legal relations
00:07:59
in such a way that it is convenient for him to
00:08:02
fulfill it, that is, this is a general
00:08:04
principle of civil law; we
00:08:05
usually have a slightly different concept
00:08:07
because when we prepare the procurement
00:08:10
documents, the ladies dictate the terms of
00:08:12
execution and our
00:08:14
future counterparties
00:08:17
practically do not have these negotiating opportunities at all, and
00:08:19
that is, in essence, it is closer to a
00:08:20
type of probably
00:08:22
civil law agreement, an
00:08:23
adhesion agreement, that is, when they
00:08:26
can simply either agree and to carry out
00:08:28
what is prescribed or not to come at all
00:08:30
but to influence the content of something to
00:08:32
settle there is
00:08:33
very little opportunity, we will
00:08:35
look at the basis for making
00:08:37
changes and of course they are
00:08:39
very limited due to the specifics of our
00:08:42
procurement activities, we spend
00:08:44
money one way or another, budget that's right, but
00:08:45
they
00:08:47
should have a certain such
00:08:51
situation related to control,
00:08:54
if it were ours, probably everyone would be
00:08:56
more or less indifferent as it
00:08:58
happens, but since this money
00:08:59
is accountable and will give accordingly, there
00:09:02
should be some kind of manipulation, all
00:09:05
manipulations should be
00:09:07
minimized as much as possible, but
00:09:08
I’m not reduced to such a minimum that
00:09:11
in the current conditions it’s generally very
00:09:13
difficult to function like this, taking into account the
00:09:15
problems associated with anxiety when
00:09:18
suppliers suspend everything for an hour or
00:09:20
because they don’t have something at all
00:09:22
now, at the moment it’s not clear when they there
00:09:26
may also be some interruptions in supplies, well, in general, this
00:09:28
began with help before problems with
00:09:30
execution, so we will also talk about this with you,
00:09:32
but the law says that this is
00:09:35
civil law, this is for Howard, and that means
00:09:37
let’s agree with him in terms of making it
00:09:39
easier to understand simply usually why
00:09:42
say so much because there
00:09:44
are two important points, the first point
00:09:46
is when buyers and lawyers are different
00:09:49
departments and lawyers live somewhere
00:09:51
in the civil law paradigm; they
00:09:53
think they can do anything at all,
00:09:55
yes yes yes, and they don’t want to at all and they don’t even
00:09:59
want to understand why this ca
00:10:01
n’t be done, the buyers come and try to
00:10:03
somehow get through to her, they don’t say it’s
00:10:05
not true, it all begins, here is
00:10:07
proof that the contract, although it is
00:10:09
called a civil contract,
00:10:11
nevertheless there is still a series of
00:10:12
hugs that special
00:10:14
legislation dictates Well, the second
00:10:16
point is why I pay attention to the terminology
00:10:18
because Law 44 is true,
00:10:22
very detailed
00:10:24
legislation when you need to take into account
00:10:26
literally every word in order to
00:10:28
understand whether it is generally applied or
00:10:30
not applicable in relation to the idea, that’s why
00:10:33
if you see somewhere this is from
00:10:36
last year it was very clear,
00:10:38
including in the classrooms, when in 2050
00:10:40
the resolution on budget discipline was
00:10:42
taken away, then amendments were made to the floor from the
00:10:44
want ridge,
00:10:46
there was a government resolution and many budget institutions,
00:10:47
especially institutions, are talking about what we should
00:10:50
do about this, these lockers are that in
00:10:53
certain by-laws very they often
00:10:55
write just the phrase yes, for example,
00:10:58
government contracts, what are you doing,
00:11:03
but the phrase government contract does not
00:11:06
mean that this norm applies
00:11:08
in general to all contracts if the customer is a
00:11:12
budgetary institution, well, let him be a
00:11:13
state budgetary institution
00:11:16
enter into government contracts
00:11:19
due to the peculiarities of the terminology, well, just a
00:11:21
contract
00:11:22
because he does not belong to the
00:11:24
category of customers who enter into
00:11:26
those very government contracts; he
00:11:28
is a recipient of budget funds, which is why
00:11:31
sometimes it is difficult to understand
00:11:33
some norm and you need to look at the
00:11:36
wording, that is, if we are talking
00:11:38
about
00:11:41
government contracts, we are talking about the fact
00:11:43
that this norm is budgetary
00:11:44
institutions do not apply, just like
00:11:47
municipal contracts, this
00:11:49
also does not apply to municipal budgetary institutions; they do
00:11:51
n’t always write
00:11:54
to customers who apply; sometimes they simply
00:11:56
use the phrase which contract, and
00:11:58
here you need to understand what kind of contract
00:12:00
you are concluding and the exchange and agree, based
00:12:03
on this, to determine whether it applies
00:12:05
to I mean, we and the regime here have a nuance
00:12:08
that exists, so I
00:12:10
would like to draw your attention to this, it is advisable to somehow lay it down,
00:12:13
among other things, and besides these two
00:12:16
standard basic terms, there is also a
00:12:19
terminology that is
00:12:20
quite new, that is, it, in principle,
00:12:23
existed before in the provisions of 44 of
00:12:26
the law, but in a separate the position of
00:12:28
the terminology did not stand out now,
00:12:31
since January 1 of this year, we have received
00:12:33
two more definitions of individual types of
00:12:34
contracts and one of them is a
00:12:37
life cycle contract, remember that
00:12:39
yesterday we also discussed the criterion before assessing the
00:12:42
life cycle and the
00:12:44
life cycle contract is
00:12:46
very a lot of rules have appeared
00:12:48
dedicated to just such contracts, which,
00:12:50
in principle, leads to certain
00:12:52
thoughts that in
00:12:57
theory there may be more cases of life cycle contracts because otherwise
00:12:59
why so much regulation, but you
00:13:02
and I remember that life
00:13:04
cycle contracts are bound by our regulations 16
00:13:07
articles up to 44 phase that yesterday they saw their
00:13:10
resolution 1087 until it was
00:13:13
very, very widely spread there,
00:13:16
but it’s possible, as trends are such in the meta
00:13:19
photo ap, due to the fact that
00:13:21
special regulation appears and again, to
00:13:24
spell out what a
00:13:25
life cycle contract is, remember what I said there
00:13:27
there are and or these are where it starts,
00:13:30
where it ends, I want that he
00:13:32
introduces himself, this is a contract that
00:13:34
provides for the supply of goods or the
00:13:36
performance of work, including, if
00:13:39
necessary, the design of a
00:13:42
capital construction project, the
00:13:43
creation of goods as a result of the
00:13:47
work and its subsequent maintenance, if
00:13:51
necessary, operation, that is,
00:13:53
subsequent maintenance here weeks before,
00:13:55
that is, subsequent maintenance, but
00:13:56
there is always, if necessary,
00:13:59
operation during the service life,
00:14:01
repairs are also always and
00:14:04
or disposal of goods created as a
00:14:07
result of the work, that is,
00:14:09
it turns out that this is where and or or
00:14:12
simply and yes, that is, you need to understand that
00:14:15
part It does not allow for this comprehensive complex,
00:14:18
as it were, alternatives,
00:14:20
for example, with maintenance and repair, and
00:14:23
not just separated by commas, they in any
00:14:25
case should be included in this contract,
00:14:28
but these phrases and or recycling,
00:14:31
including and or recycling, says
00:14:33
that we should not include we don’t need to include,
00:14:36
but about design, too, up to including,
00:14:39
design
00:14:40
can include and can include, yes, that
00:14:43
is, it may include, it may
00:14:45
not include, that is, this block is
00:14:47
also broken down and set up, here is
00:14:52
another type of contract, also
00:14:55
relatively new, this is a
00:14:57
supply contract goods are necessary for the
00:14:59
normal life support of citizens,
00:15:01
here is a very interesting point, maybe let’s first
00:15:06
look at the wording - this is a contract that
00:15:08
provides for the supply of food,
00:15:10
that is, in fact, it is any
00:15:12
food product and the
00:15:15
color necessary for the provision of ambulance,
00:15:18
including emergency specialized
00:15:19
medical care in an emergency or
00:15:21
emergency form of
00:15:23
medicines, fuel, the
00:15:26
absence of which will lead to a disruption in the
00:15:28
normal life support of citizens and
00:15:31
it will be clear that not all medicines and not
00:15:37
all food products either, but fuel is very difficult to purchase and a
00:15:42
fair question may arise, whether
00:15:44
this is what all those
00:15:47
institutions smell like and it is said
00:15:49
who applies
00:15:50
whether this applies only to those institutions
00:15:53
that purchase, well, this whole
00:15:55
complex and
00:15:57
the answer, well, maybe it is obvious to some, to others no
00:16:00
no, that is, if you do not care as
00:16:04
representatives of some institution to the
00:16:07
organization, you just buy fuel from the 10th
00:16:09
list, then when purchasing fuel
00:16:12
in fact, you are still concluding a contract
00:16:13
for normal life support,
00:16:22
it will lead in any case because
00:16:24
you are any customer, even a
00:16:27
budgetary institution, if it is a
00:16:29
government body, then it was created for some kind of
00:16:31
mission, and the fact is that not all government bodies
00:16:34
are created in order to -the
00:16:36
function of ensuring that society
00:16:38
functionaries,
00:16:40
budgetary institutions do not exercise the
00:16:42
powers of government bodies is
00:16:46
practically to me that is, all
00:16:49
institutions that are created in the
00:16:50
state structure are created
00:16:52
in order to do something for themselves
00:16:54
and in order to ensure the
00:16:56
normal functioning of society,
00:16:58
therefore, although not directly but indirectly
00:17:01
for example if that
00:17:03
[music]
00:17:05
love example here you are in a
00:17:07
company car going somewhere, you are not going on
00:17:10
business and not just for business
00:17:12
for your organization, but you are going to do
00:17:14
something so that your organization
00:17:16
functions properly and
00:17:18
performed some function for the sake of which
00:17:21
it created and this function is
00:17:23
provided in contrast,
00:17:25
so it’s not clear what
00:17:29
they want there in circles and circles, but it still
00:17:31
leads precisely to the fact that everything that is
00:17:34
purchased is still one way or another
00:17:36
from this list is aimed at
00:17:38
ensuring the normal
00:17:40
normal functioning of society,
00:17:42
therefore, formally, when buying fuel,
00:17:45
any customer enters into just such a
00:17:48
contract; in fact, it is hardly
00:17:50
worth waiting for any specifics;
00:17:52
why, because it is not said anywhere that the
00:17:54
government should
00:17:55
define something specific about this
00:17:58
issue for now the Ministry of Finance, no one
00:18:00
sent Aries about this either, that is, do
00:18:02
we understand the situation correctly or
00:18:05
not, that they meant something else there,
00:18:06
who knows what they
00:18:08
were guided by, but why do I
00:18:10
forgive attention to this because you know
00:18:12
that there are special provisions both
00:18:13
anti-dumping measures,
00:18:16
which are applied precisely under such contracts
00:18:18
when these are not alternative
00:18:22
anti-dumping measures, as we did with
00:18:24
the assessment yesterday in a spiral, that is, either by
00:18:26
increasing the security by one and a half times, or I
00:18:30
will evaluate you otherwise, this does not
00:18:32
work, that is, or so years or so
00:18:35
something one must be chosen at the start when we are
00:18:37
preparing for procurement, but for
00:18:39
food, means of providing
00:18:40
medical care,
00:18:42
medicines and fuel, it is like an
00:18:44
imperative rule that if a
00:18:46
procurement participant is reduced by 25 percent or more, then in addition to the fact
00:18:48
that he must provide a
00:18:50
basic set of anti-dumping measures,
00:18:53
increase security or provide
00:18:56
information in good faith, but
00:18:59
in addition to this, he must
00:19:02
provide some kind of justification for the
00:19:03
proposed price,
00:19:07
and if he doesn’t say what
00:19:10
it looks like, what it is, well, in
00:19:11
fact, it happens differently if he is the
00:19:16
manufacturer himself, then he can send a letter from himself
00:19:18
and warranty some kind of analogue of this
00:19:20
write that we are ready yes yes yes we are
00:19:23
ready that is, as if once again he
00:19:24
must confirm the fact that he can
00:19:27
supply some other document should
00:19:29
be any that will give you an understanding
00:19:31
that he is ready to deliver realistically at
00:19:33
the price that offers and here is the very
00:19:36
fact that if such a
00:19:38
situation arises when the participant comes from the smoke
00:19:40
pings, he will provide increased
00:19:42
security on a piece of paper without turning it on, he
00:19:44
will already be considered as having evaded
00:19:46
signing the contract with all the
00:19:48
ensuing consequences, that is,
00:19:50
you understand, yes, this is the chain, so I
00:19:52
am focusing on this on the other
00:19:55
hand, if for food, as
00:19:57
a rule, this is a fairly common
00:19:59
story when the price drops by seven notes, then for
00:20:02
fuel, well, perhaps
00:20:05
it doesn’t fall that much from the starting
00:20:08
price, of
00:20:09
course nothing is ruled out, that this is
00:20:12
possible and legal in principle, well,
00:20:14
we just have to understand that this norm,
00:20:16
in principle, will apply to all
00:20:19
customers who buy gas, and
00:20:23
there is
00:20:25
another new term that
00:20:29
created a lot of noise last year,
00:20:32
this is still in fact such
00:20:36
terminology,
00:20:37
how controversial it is, why because it
00:20:39
really can be
00:20:40
interpreted differently this concept of a separate stage of a
00:20:43
contract,
00:20:45
if you look at the 44th federal law, in
00:20:49
the process of its development, you
00:20:50
and I could notice that the concept is the
00:20:56
very wording of the stages of the contract, it was
00:20:59
found in the law itself there from time
00:21:02
immemorial, from the very beginning, that is, in
00:21:04
general, this concept as such did not
00:21:06
exist for a
00:21:07
long time then there was one precedent,
00:21:10
I’ll tell you about it, but the very concept of
00:21:12
the possibility of stages was provided for by
00:21:16
Federal Law 44, so it seems that the
00:21:19
faring is not new, but the
00:21:21
new one should be contained
00:21:24
as it generally happens, even what a contract stage is,
00:21:29
the law was written that, well, let’s say from the
00:21:33
date of execution of the contract in parentheses or a
00:21:36
separate stage
00:21:37
similar phrases they always existed in
00:21:41
44
00:21:42
when it
00:21:45
was not described in any way in the law itself that it was considered a
00:21:47
stage, there were a lot of such
00:21:50
practical complex situations when
00:21:52
the customer understands one stage as 2
00:21:55
controllers and another, and when the
00:21:57
scheduled inspection came, the nunics of
00:22:00
such conflicts of interest and when
00:22:02
the customer says no, without giving it,
00:22:04
the controller says this, well, let’s say there is a
00:22:06
supply of electricity; there is a contract for the
00:22:10
supply of electricity until it
00:22:15
is Emily, the monthly volume
00:22:17
of consumption is exactly what
00:22:20
is clear, but the answers received were at
00:22:22
least different, which means that we, in principle,
00:22:24
are also able to understand differently,
00:22:26
that’s where this golden one is the middle now,
00:22:29
while we’ll try to
00:22:31
draw some conclusions, in my opinion,
00:22:34
again, as we see, opinions
00:22:37
can be different, and in my
00:22:38
opinion, the electricity supply agreement
00:22:40
really has no stages, why
00:22:43
and because, well, it’s a single cycle, that is
00:22:47
mia okay, I sign a contract for a year, they
00:22:48
supply me with electricity for a year,
00:22:51
otherwise there is a switch, we also
00:22:52
flip from some point I will turn off the
00:22:56
electricity at some point it turns on
00:22:58
correctly, it’s for me
00:22:59
around the clock Harry because it’s conditionally
00:23:02
around the clock turning on
00:23:06
turning off the switch then that’s also
00:23:07
possible to calculate, I understand that this is
00:23:10
absurd, I specifically give such an example
00:23:12
so that the
00:23:14
whole scale of
00:23:16
this whole tragedy is simply understandable, which is why
00:23:20
these different approaches were there and at some
00:23:23
point in time an official
00:23:25
wording appeared that this is considered a stage,
00:23:27
remember there was a resolution 1093,
00:23:29
probably acts about it which
00:23:33
required the publication of a report on the
00:23:35
execution of the contract of a separate stage, and
00:23:37
in it the gift made changes to it in
00:23:41
1093 and those who understood the royal
00:23:45
also made changes to Article 94, and it
00:23:47
was said that there the stages
00:23:50
are regulated by by-laws in an
00:23:52
act under the law, this resolution
00:23:53
was it’s written that there are stages about
00:23:56
construction projects and after the contract there are millions of people, so at least
00:24:01
some specifics have appeared,
00:24:03
but not for everyone because the builders
00:24:05
say so,
00:24:07
construction stages, but is there a stage here
00:24:12
in this particular construction site? The organizers
00:24:14
really had questions, but everyone else had questions
00:24:16
as if the question more or less disappeared, everything
00:24:19
up to 100 million rubles, that is, if I
00:24:20
myself didn’t write that I have these stages,
00:24:23
it means they don’t exist, and when could
00:24:26
the controller come to the customer and wave this
00:24:28
resolution and say drying, here’s the
00:24:30
number of millions for me, I don’t it’s written
00:24:32
about the stage, which means there are none, but unfortunately,
00:24:34
but for some, unfortunately, for some, fortunately,
00:24:37
this norm collapsed without living
00:24:39
with us for probably six months, that is,
00:24:41
they canceled the countdown once they changed the report, that’s all
00:24:45
that was written there in the resolution, it was
00:24:46
removed that it’s in oblivion so we have again come to
00:24:50
where we started, that again the concept of
00:24:52
stages has disappeared, they began in short, letters in
00:24:55
Minsk
00:24:56
wrote for a long time about the fact that the customer
00:25:00
has the right to provide for stages in the contract himself,
00:25:02
and even there was a clause, including
00:25:06
in the contracts both
00:25:08
defense orders were extinguished,
00:25:10
the customer himself determines Well, the letters didn’t
00:25:13
stop at some point, the Ministry of Finance
00:25:15
practically wrote, why are you
00:25:17
bothering with these stages, just
00:25:19
write that you don’t have them,
00:25:21
and here’s something like this letter, it was
00:25:24
March 2020, this story went on for a long time, they
00:25:27
didn’t release one of for your
00:25:29
first ones, explain the size in which they
00:25:31
wrote, if you think that it smells,
00:25:34
write about it in the notice in the draft
00:25:36
frames,
00:25:38
as if everything is logical, well, in principle, it’s logical, it does
00:25:41
n’t interfere at all with writing, there are no stages, and
00:25:45
for a certain period of time, it seems that it became
00:25:48
more or less clear what to write
00:25:51
absence will help, and then when
00:25:53
the controller comes, I show my
00:25:55
piece of paper, in contrast it says that they are not there, and
00:25:57
our times it is written that it does not mean and is not there, that
00:26:00
is, whoever saw this letter could have
00:26:02
referred to it in general before him, speak
00:26:04
in essence, so the regulator said that
00:26:06
it is possible, therefore and I’m writing, but in principle they
00:26:08
told the truth, it really can be so,
00:26:10
but here again, hello again, this has never
00:26:14
happened, and here again
00:26:16
the term appears, what is a stage of a contract, and
00:26:19
this is attempt number 2, and whoever saw the
00:26:21
optimization package in the project could
00:26:23
see a completely different form, the
00:26:26
official stage appears and The law
00:26:29
goes through all the
00:26:31
readings,
00:26:34
the process of adopting the law, and you and I
00:26:37
get this: that the individual stages of
00:26:40
the execution of the contract are part of the
00:26:42
obligation of the supplier of the contractor, the
00:26:44
performer in respect of which
00:26:46
the contract establishes the
00:26:48
customer’s obligation to ensure acceptance with
00:26:51
registration in accordance with the 44th phase of the
00:26:54
acceptance document and payment for the delivered
00:26:57
goods, work performed, services rendered There
00:27:04
was nothing everywhere about this wording, which
00:27:06
can also be read in different ways, and the
00:27:14
stage of the contract is always when I
00:27:16
accept, I pay, no, it’s not
00:27:20
obvious, that is, on the contrary, on the contrary, it’s
00:27:23
probably obvious that, as if
00:27:26
based on this wording, every
00:27:27
acceptance, but of course it
00:27:30
entails obligations for payment and since there is an
00:27:33
acceptance of payment, it means this is
00:27:35
a stage, well, at least terminologically,
00:27:38
this is an approach and here is
00:27:41
another situation, well let’s assume
00:27:45
I have a delivery of a car
00:27:49
in the amount of 1 piece, they brought it to me, I
00:27:53
accepted it and paid for it, in fact, I have one,
00:27:57
this is if I need to bring, let’s say, two
00:28:00
cars to which time ranges
00:28:03
according to the contract, well, like white1, they brought
00:28:07
the money changer and paid for it, then after some
00:28:09
time again people, if there is a
00:28:11
certain plan for when I need to
00:28:13
bring this car,
00:28:16
but this does not always happen and
00:28:19
such purchasing situations are rather
00:28:22
rare than standard practice but
00:28:25
standard practice is either contracts
00:28:28
based on requests that spawn or
00:28:31
contracts that are currently not
00:28:33
concluded in a certain volume, that is, when I
00:28:36
have a certain need, this is possible
00:28:38
quite noticeably and in quantity,
00:28:40
and I will choose these products as
00:28:45
needed,
00:28:46
not all at once, but then when it arises
00:28:50
and in contracts for applications, I write there the
00:28:53
procedure for sending an application, that is,
00:28:56
over a period of time, in such and such
00:28:57
a way, I send an application to me, they must
00:29:00
fulfill this application within some
00:29:02
time, and
00:29:05
I have no idea how many of these applications I will have
00:29:11
there may be little hydra at all,
00:29:14
different circumstances, there may be one
00:29:16
application, it may be one application per
00:29:18
month, it may be two applications per month,
00:29:21
it may be 5 applications per month, then for
00:29:23
six months nothing is sent at all, that is,
00:29:26
the situation may be earlier on that I am
00:29:28
writing on the condition that the contract is executed
00:29:30
according to requests because I cannot
00:29:32
foresee the moment when
00:29:34
the need arises in advance, therefore the conditions are the
00:29:39
same, close to this, another moment
00:29:42
associated with
00:29:44
contracts, obligations under which are
00:29:46
fulfilled
00:29:47
systematically, for example, every day in the
00:29:50
morning they bring me newspapers,
00:29:54
every day in the morning they bring me newspapers
00:29:55
milk
00:29:58
and this happens every day
00:30:00
on weekdays, I am in kindergarten, I have a
00:30:04
delivery every day,
00:30:06
this is the stage,
00:30:09
if I take an
00:30:14
undefined amount every day, I leave it there for now and
00:30:16
will return to it, that
00:30:19
is, the questions are so pressing, this
00:30:23
gave rise to the desire to contact the Ministry of Finance and the
00:30:28
Ministry of Finance writes the following: they refer to the
00:30:32
provisions of the civil code and this means
00:30:35
that here and now I will quote so as not to
00:30:40
confuse the proposal, the
00:30:42
general meaning is that the deadline for execution
00:30:46
can be determined either by some
00:30:48
point in time or by an indication of the
00:30:51
occurrence of some event that
00:30:54
must certainly
00:30:56
occur this provision then Article 9090 of the
00:31:01
Civil Code and the very
00:31:03
events that must certainly
00:31:05
occur in contracts based on applications
00:31:07
is precisely the pact in the direction of the application,
00:31:09
that is, again, the bindings and the fact that well, there is a
00:31:14
certain deadline for the fulfillment of the obligation,
00:31:16
he is, that is, he and he either is or
00:31:19
he arises from the moment when
00:31:22
the application is sent,
00:31:25
that is, they started from this,
00:31:27
and then they write, the
00:31:30
main idea is highlighted in red, they
00:31:32
write that the case is indicated in the application,
00:31:35
this is precisely the contract for applications choose to
00:31:37
do it, in which the period is determined by
00:31:40
the event of the application, delivery of the part goods,
00:31:43
performance of part of the work, provision of
00:31:46
services, followed by acceptance and payment
00:31:49
may be separate stages of the
00:31:53
contract, provided that the contract
00:31:56
establishes that the customer is obligated to
00:31:58
ensure acceptance of the goods,
00:32:01
and
00:32:02
that is, the key keyword here is
00:32:05
can,
00:32:07
but it is written in such a way that it is
00:32:11
not immediately clear, but it would seem that
00:32:14
the Ministry of Finance to us says approximately the following:
00:32:20
if your contract is executed
00:32:23
in bubbles, then each application
00:32:26
will be a stage, well, this is not entirely
00:32:29
true, this is not what they wanted to say, this is what
00:32:33
believers wanted to say, and in principle, this
00:32:35
can be subtracted from this thought and subtracted
00:32:37
into this wording if the emphasis is
00:32:39
placed differently on the proposal in other
00:32:41
words, since this may mean that the
00:32:45
customer has the right to
00:32:52
prescribe the terms of his contract himself when the customer has
00:32:56
this very Christmas tree, that is, the very
00:32:59
fact that they deliver something to you every day does
00:33:01
not mean
00:33:04
that it was just a reception, that is,
00:33:08
remember These are the acts that at the end of the
00:33:10
month for the entire volume,
00:33:13
many benefit from this mechanism,
00:33:16
which I accept for a whole month, then
00:33:18
we close everything in a single act, and from that
00:33:20
moment I have the obligation to
00:33:22
pay for the set time,
00:33:24
that is, every day happens at York
00:33:26
and then the actual acceptance but
00:33:29
I don’t cover the entire volume in one act, this
00:33:31
happens there for a month, that is,
00:33:33
this option is possible as
00:33:36
before, but then this needs to be
00:33:38
written down in the contract, but
00:33:40
independently,
00:33:41
but it
00:33:43
seems easier, but not every day there is no
00:33:46
need to publish information, it would be a tattoo
00:33:48
I don’t have 365, it will be according to 12 dates,
00:33:52
at least that’s better, but
00:33:55
the question still remains on the surface: what if
00:33:59
this is not a daily supply, but just a
00:34:03
supply according to need, but the fact is that we have a
00:34:07
law from the moment
00:34:09
this appeared term, a whole series of
00:34:12
conditions appeared when the customer must
00:34:15
prescribe these stages in advance and it all starts
00:34:18
with lighting in which the customer
00:34:20
must indicate the start date of
00:34:23
this stage, well, first of all, the
00:34:26
start date of the end and nmc,
00:34:31
but this is generally a pipe
00:34:35
path according to requests, again, I have no idea I don’t
00:34:37
have
00:34:39
when this application will be sent and the
00:34:42
start and end date to indicate, I’m just
00:34:44
physically
00:34:45
therefore, but the Ministry of Finance in general says, as
00:34:49
if hinting at the fact that in this case,
00:34:51
write, remember what I said and that
00:34:55
you don’t have contract stages for applications,
00:34:57
but on the other hand parties, since there is no
00:35:00
clear regulation of this issue and the
00:35:02
wording can be read in different
00:35:05
ways,
00:35:07
this may create some risks during
00:35:10
planned activities
00:35:12
because it is not a fact that the controller
00:35:14
will lay out this phrase for
00:35:16
spare parts and even if the curtains are and
00:35:19
laid out for spare parts, he will understand and and just
00:35:21
like and we and we had attempt number 2
00:35:24
with these stages to reach the Ministry of Finance
00:35:26
this year, I tried to reformulate
00:35:31
the question we sent but they answered
00:35:34
exactly the same thing,
00:35:35
that is, apparently they saw the words stages in
00:35:38
general the same thing, the question was a little
00:35:40
different and since this problem is well known to
00:35:43
many,
00:35:46
you probably know that the Federal
00:35:48
Treasury
00:35:49
regulates them, firstly, they are one of the
00:35:52
active participants in the process of
00:35:55
amending Federal Law 44,
00:35:58
that is, they do not have the status of an official
00:36:01
regulator, unlike the Ministry of Finance, but
00:36:04
any amendment 44 federal law they
00:36:07
are introduced with the active participation of at
00:36:09
least the film of the Treasury and the Fas of Russia, which is why
00:36:11
the Treasury and you are
00:36:14
involved in this process quite
00:36:15
actively, and as the authorities they also
00:36:18
directly maintain a unified information
00:36:19
system which, all these buttons
00:36:21
set up the legislation,
00:36:24
therefore periodically at various meetings
00:36:27
for different questions with the Treasury and
00:36:30
again this question is asked and it seems like they
00:36:33
at least said that they understood they
00:36:36
also lived in about the same real ones for a long time
00:36:38
that the Ministry of Finance and it seems like in January there was
00:36:42
another meeting and
00:36:45
the Treasury said but that’s what’s the matter and
00:36:48
we kind of understand, we will discuss this issue with the Ministry of Finance
00:36:51
in the near future,
00:36:53
they said, but now it’s as if the mark
00:36:57
is running out and for now we have nothing new, that’s why
00:36:59
I’d probably like to
00:37:03
see some kind of reaction from the regulator, but
00:37:05
you see, they’re still pretending to be
00:37:07
dead,
00:37:08
they’re doing everything normally it can be
00:37:11
pumped up, maybe because the
00:37:15
uploads according to 44 pride laws are used to blowing
00:37:18
on the water, but objectively yes, because
00:37:20
every action there can be
00:37:21
perceived somehow incorrectly by the
00:37:24
controllers, so maybe this
00:37:25
reinsurance can really be
00:37:27
much simpler and
00:37:30
if it turns out to be so, well excellent,
00:37:33
good, but it’s not clear why,
00:37:38
because the control event, again,
00:37:40
when we understand how they look at it
00:37:42
only next year, because
00:37:44
internal financial control is for the
00:37:46
next year, it will come to check this year
00:37:48
before 22-23, and
00:37:52
we see the inspection reports accordingly only 23
00:37:54
are ready, so now, as it were, the score
00:37:58
knows how they will look, but there is one
00:38:01
moment that is more or less safe, in my
00:38:04
opinion, again, there is no practice,
00:38:06
so there is nothing to share, but it seems to me
00:38:09
that this is reasonable, at least it is
00:38:10
logical, you
00:38:12
and I know that there is a
00:38:14
procurement mechanism with indefinite volume
00:38:17
in fact dabka delivery according to requests
00:38:19
indefinite volume they have a lot
00:38:21
of similar points, in particular in the
00:38:24
sense that when I purchase using any of these
00:38:27
mechanisms, I bring to the attention of the
00:38:29
procurement participants that I may
00:38:32
not take the entire volume, I will
00:38:34
take some part in which is not necessary,
00:38:36
and in this case, before in purchases with an
00:38:39
undetermined volume, I also
00:38:40
asked for the products to be brought to me,
00:38:43
see how I can buy a thousand
00:38:46
stationery there according to requests, but I can buy a thousand stationery, and
00:38:49
in this write down that
00:38:52
they buy a thousand stationery,
00:38:54
and at unit prices
00:38:58
in the end everything is the same, the same application
00:39:01
will be sent, yes, this will be the one that
00:39:03
started it, it will be
00:39:05
different for me, and
00:39:08
from the point of view of the exact term, this is according to
00:39:12
contracts, here there will be differences
00:39:15
and look, when I carry out the purchase according to
00:39:18
applications, I write that the number of
00:39:21
stationery but there are 100 pieces
00:39:26
that is, I have a specific volume,
00:39:28
and in my conditions it is then written that
00:39:31
I choose partially, then what I didn’t choose, I do
00:39:33
n’t accept, not paid for,
00:39:35
if it’s not a certain volume, I write not the
00:39:40
quantity, but essentially unit prices
00:39:44
and as much as on that indefinite one,
00:39:48
I’ll choose exactly that much how much do I need,
00:39:51
but just on the topic of personal prices
00:39:54
that will not be offered to me, there is no
00:39:56
volume as such, and based on this,
00:39:59
if we look at the wording, we see
00:40:02
that a separate stage of the contract is part of
00:40:05
the supplier’s obligation,
00:40:09
and that is, 1 1 piece of proposals, and so
00:40:12
in contracts on applications a part
00:40:15
obligations can be isolated, I
00:40:18
have a quantity, albeit a limit, but with an
00:40:21
indefinite volume, I have no volume,
00:40:24
there is no volume, which means it is impossible to
00:40:27
separate out a part of it, which is why
00:40:30
I come to the conclusion
00:40:32
that in contracts with an indefinite
00:40:34
volume there are no stages at all,
00:40:40
so this is the stage safer
00:40:42
because here, logically from the term,
00:40:44
you can justify to the controller that it is
00:40:46
impossible to allocate a part as
00:40:47
you do not exist in volume,
00:40:51
so it seems to me that this option is
00:40:54
safer. The second question that
00:40:56
also often arises in relation to these stages is the
00:40:57
question of when this stage
00:41:00
will end with
00:41:03
the fulfillment of obligations or the
00:41:08
management considers payment that the payment is
00:41:11
not directly written on the one hand,
00:41:13
again based on the proposal, it seems that all the
00:41:16
same the implementation is actually,
00:41:18
but the treasury believes that the payment, again, is
00:41:22
tasty, I’m only in form, but all these
00:41:25
events that were not carried out
00:41:27
on issues of changes in
00:41:29
legislation there according to the update of the version,
00:41:31
there are other things before they were on YouTube, they
00:41:34
removed everything from there and if you want, but
00:41:38
how to make sure, yes, what I just
00:41:41
talked about is that they
00:41:43
think that these are stages they are these videos
00:41:46
that were publicly available on
00:41:47
YouTube they moved to personal accounts
00:41:50
in the user manual, which I
00:41:53
also told you about yesterday, now they
00:41:56
will post information there about the
00:41:58
events that they held openly, and at the
00:42:00
end of last year they had a
00:42:02
seven-hour video of events, and that’s
00:42:07
exactly what they are in it, yes, they are not in this
00:42:11
VKS these are the longest centuries and a
00:42:14
neighbor, so you can immediately
00:42:16
identify him, here they are just
00:42:18
talking about answering this question
00:42:20
that was asked in the audience about that stage
00:42:23
it ends when
00:42:25
they don’t say execution or payment, we believe that payment is well, there is
00:42:27
no internal financial
00:42:29
control that’s why it probably doesn’t make
00:42:32
sense to listen,
00:42:34
we’ll probably still
00:42:36
initiate the next
00:42:38
next series, we’ll sort out the current
00:42:42
situation, the next series of requests from the Ministry of Finance,
00:42:47
well, just to somehow
00:42:50
show you the position in a more
00:42:52
official format, but for now you have
00:42:54
n’t finished the second block yet that’s why it’s
00:42:57
still in the process, most
00:42:59
likely I’ll include this question there just so
00:43:01
that there is some kind of written understanding of
00:43:03
their position,
00:43:06
although again, yes, you can argue with this
00:43:08
because based on
00:43:10
the wording and based on the logic again,
00:43:13
if I define a stage at
00:43:15
the end of the stage set some
00:43:18
date, and then of course it’s easier for me to
00:43:22
set dates for the fulfillment of obligations
00:43:24
by the supplier because if I’m talking about
00:43:26
paying me, payment is always within
00:43:31
no more than how many days,
00:43:35
respectively no more, this means I
00:43:38
can from the first day to pay it on the
00:43:39
second day and on the last day of this
00:43:41
period and how on which day I
00:43:44
will make the payment specifically, I cannot know in advance,
00:43:47
that is, this moment is so
00:43:50
difficult, but probably if you again
00:43:53
adhere to the position
00:43:54
of the Treasury on this issue, then you
00:43:56
need to at most, you simply include the
00:43:59
deadline for payment that you
00:44:01
may have, that is, if you pay for more than
00:44:03
10 days, know something to calculate these 10
00:44:05
days and include the tenth day sometime after the
00:44:08
end of this
00:44:10
until
00:44:14
maybe it takes place, we are also talking about
00:44:17
standard contracts with you talk
00:44:19
today, but maybe it is also possible to
00:44:25
write this feature
00:44:27
of phasing directly into the contract,
00:44:30
if you again work with stages and
00:44:31
will set them up, then
00:44:33
write directly in the contract that the stage
00:44:35
includes a payment deadline and then add
00:44:39
it there so that there is uncertainty
00:44:41
this can be avoided because you yourself
00:44:44
then establish the stage so
00:44:47
that there is not this different approach
00:44:50
when it is better to just
00:44:52
write it down directly, this is what the new
00:44:56
terminology concerns, as for the form of
00:44:58
the contract, as a general rule we have two
00:45:02
forms, this is a simple written form of
00:45:04
the transaction in in those cases when we conclude a
00:45:06
contract based on the results of purchases from a
00:45:08
single supplier, the standard
00:45:10
basic one is like that, except this is
00:45:12
electronic procurement, I’m older to dig
00:45:14
parts 1290 3 articles and for electronic
00:45:18
procurement, as a general rule, we have an
00:45:20
electronic transaction form, but in closed
00:45:22
procurements of clarity it is closed electronic
00:45:24
then the electronic form, if it is closed on
00:45:27
paper, then a simple written form of
00:45:29
the transaction, in principle,
00:45:31
everything is logical, but
00:45:35
such a trend appears and there is a
00:45:39
deferred provision in the forty-fourth
00:45:41
law that from April 1, 23
00:45:45
it will be technically possible to
00:45:47
conclude contracts with, on a separate
00:45:50
basis, the purchase of a supplier through
00:45:53
from that is, in electronic form,
00:45:57
this will concern three cases: this is the
00:46:00
conclusion of contracts by the light supplier
00:46:03
according to and on the basis of an act of the president or the
00:46:05
government, up to 7 years by the supplier
00:46:08
who is determined by such an act as the
00:46:10
only second procurement under
00:46:13
exclusive powers, that is, under
00:46:15
paragraph 6, with the authorities
00:46:16
subordinate to them kozenko my or
00:46:18
joint stock companies and and the third is,
00:46:22
oddly enough, point 17, this concerns
00:46:25
such creative times to drill these when
00:46:27
various cultural institutions there
00:46:29
acquire
00:46:30
all sorts of different
00:46:33
things in order to hold some kind of
00:46:35
cultural events there and attract some kind of
00:46:37
groups and props makeup
00:46:40
furniture there stage costumes
00:46:42
instruments and other other history a
00:46:45
technical possibility will appear in the form of the
00:46:48
right to conclude a contract in electronic
00:46:51
form, that is, there will be no obligations
00:46:55
only the right, so if you want an
00:46:57
electronic contract please want it
00:47:00
on paper please continue to
00:47:02
work on paper it will be like rights and
00:47:05
again one more this applies only to 3
00:47:10
cases of purchasing from our
00:47:13
favorite supplier up to 600 thousand rubles, a small volume
00:47:16
it will remain for now in the same
00:47:19
real ones that you have right
00:47:21
now
00:47:24
if the contract is electronic, then acceptance is
00:47:27
electronic, if the contract is paper, then
00:47:29
acceptance is paper
00:47:35
innovation, which has not yet arrived but in the
00:47:38
twenty-third year we
00:47:41
expected her to sort out the contents of the
00:47:44
contract, what it should include,
00:47:47
and you and I also talked at one of our
00:47:51
meetings about the fact that there are a number of contracts with the
00:47:54
so-called reduced
00:47:56
requirements from the simplified requirement
00:47:59
from the table to the contents of the contract and we said
00:48:01
that this Regarding purchases from a
00:48:03
single supplier,
00:48:07
there are features not provided for in
00:48:10
Part
00:48:11
15-30 4 44, which says that when
00:48:16
concluding contracts, in cases of these
00:48:20
individual provisions of Article 34 may not
00:48:25
apply, not all of
00:48:29
what the contract is and in which individual
00:48:32
requirements for the content of the contract are not
00:48:34
mandatory. that various communal services
00:48:38
and monopolies on 1 8 twenty-ninth
00:48:41
point small volume up to 600 thousand rubles on
00:48:44
both points 4 and 5 for
00:48:47
individual customers you see there are
00:48:50
exceptions that under part 1290 3 articles
00:48:54
this option does not work, that is, the
00:48:56
contract under part 12 is full there are no
00:49:00
simplifications, but the contract for
00:49:04
4 5 on such a traditional basis is up to 600
00:49:07
thousand rubles, there may be
00:49:08
simplifications further 15 this is visiting
00:49:11
various events 23 provision of
00:49:15
maintenance services repair maintenance of buildings
00:49:17
and structures
00:49:18
business trips 26 points of medicine
00:49:22
according to the decision per year on 28 points but and
00:49:26
several others to found 9 20 21
00:49:29
there 40 becoming the first there such specificity
00:49:31
specificity
00:49:33
ensuring the visit of heads of state
00:49:35
various
00:49:36
purchases
00:49:40
related to archival data and a number of
00:49:43
others, yes, that is, they are more
00:49:44
specific, in this case I
00:49:48
will say again that in part 15 the transfer is
00:49:51
get it and 3 4 the customer may not
00:49:54
comply with the requirements that are
00:49:57
provided for in parts 49 1113
00:50:04
34 of the article, after all, not all of them, but only
00:50:07
these ones that sit them them sit conditions on the
00:50:11
liability of the parties for non-fulfillment and
00:50:13
improper fulfillment of obligations
00:50:15
there are fines and penalties, we have, as a general
00:50:18
rule, the amount of the penalty is determined by
00:50:21
Article 34 itself, but the amount of the fine
00:50:24
is determined by a separate
00:50:26
government decree, and our fine actually
00:50:28
depends, as a general rule, on the size of the
00:50:31
contract price,
00:50:33
tied to the price defect, we will
00:50:36
look at this layout today for both
00:50:38
penalties and the general thesis is so
00:50:42
standard that those the amounts of penalties
00:50:45
that are determined by the legislation on the
00:50:47
contract system, they must be
00:50:48
observed in all procurements, in all cases, but in
00:50:53
procurements with these
00:50:55
exceptional requirements,
00:50:57
you may not adhere to the general
00:51:00
requirements for the amount of penalties for 44 it is
00:51:04
absolutely safe and not
00:51:07
to adhere to or the phrase yes does not
00:51:08
apply does not mean that you should
00:51:11
this must be excluded no, you
00:51:14
want to continue writing this phrase, again,
00:51:17
does not mean that you necessarily need to
00:51:19
simplify for someone, that you can, on the contrary,
00:51:21
complicate it,
00:51:23
that is, the phrase simply says that
00:51:26
you can formulate the condition it is
00:51:28
a penalty in exactly the way that
00:51:31
you need them it is
00:51:34
simply established by law,
00:51:37
so the example that was given with a
00:51:40
very small penny size, and in this
00:51:44
case, when concluding a contract of up to 600 thousand rubles, you
00:51:48
have the right to set the size higher
00:51:52
than the basic one that is the law if
00:51:54
you want, but will strengthen the protection of your
00:51:56
interests,
00:51:58
if you do not see it as expedient, you can do
00:52:01
nothing at all write and then
00:52:03
if there are
00:52:05
chips with the execution of the contract, well, what a penny
00:52:08
in the understanding of the legislation, but
00:52:10
something just goes wrong, it
00:52:13
will be necessary to demand
00:52:14
[music]
00:52:15
compensation for penalties, then you just
00:52:18
open gk and the situation is a penalty and,
00:52:20
accordingly, on the grounds for which
00:52:22
citizenship is provided we will
00:52:24
demand to indignate penalties if they
00:52:26
are not forested,
00:52:28
but again you want to protect interests to a greater
00:52:31
extent, to make it tougher, to do all the possibilities
00:52:34
you have for this, and the next
00:52:37
moment is an obligation, well, this is,
00:52:41
as it were, provided for by law, but the
00:52:44
controllers will most likely say that this is
00:52:46
wrong, I understand that this is It
00:52:49
will sound strange, it seems like the law allows it, but
00:52:51
control will say that this most likely
00:52:53
cannot be done, and this is the obligation
00:52:55
to make a demand for payment of a
00:52:57
penalty if it arises
00:53:01
even in small purchases, but as a general
00:53:04
rule, if
00:53:05
there are penalties, then we must demand
00:53:09
that they be reimbursed, and this is a general rule,
00:53:12
but here that’s why it
00:53:15
was envisaged as possible
00:53:18
to say
00:53:19
how as possible the rights of the customer want to
00:53:23
demand compacting it’s worth not
00:53:24
demanding why the controller will most
00:53:27
likely not agree with this the thing is that if
00:53:30
we are talking about pbs oh yes receive as
00:53:32
budget funds then the money that
00:53:35
comes will drip budget
00:53:39
and since the budget is replenishing the budget, well, this is
00:53:43
important if you don’t demand and the budget is not
00:53:45
replenished, it means that in essence you have deprived the
00:53:47
budget of
00:53:49
additional funds from a source of
00:53:51
income, and therefore if you get
00:53:54
budget funds, well, you definitely need to say
00:53:57
that it’s better, of course, to demand payment
00:53:59
because most likely there will be from
00:54:01
if the controllers will somehow
00:54:03
qualify it, then not as a violation of
00:54:06
phase 44, which allows for such a possibility of
00:54:07
detecting violations of budget
00:54:09
legislation because you, by
00:54:11
your inaction in this case, are causing
00:54:13
damage,
00:54:17
but if the customer is a budgetary
00:54:19
institution, here the picture changes a little
00:54:21
because the money is the
00:54:24
customer received a budgetary institution
00:54:25
receives upon request the dam costs this is
00:54:29
not tax income, that is, in fact,
00:54:32
this money goes to the income items of
00:54:35
the budgetary institution and these income
00:54:38
items are essentially their own funds
00:54:40
which the customer has the right to
00:54:42
dispose of himself, that is, if the customer does not
00:54:45
demand to pay a penalty, then in fact by
00:54:46
this inaction, he harms himself,
00:54:49
his non-budgetary wallet,
00:54:56
even in the logic of the budget code, the money of
00:54:59
which the budgetary institution receives,
00:55:01
even in the form of subsidies, this money
00:55:05
is not budgetary from the point of view of the
00:55:08
budget code, that is, if it
00:55:10
came to us, then it is ours,
00:55:15
but in this case the controllers are more likely In total,
00:55:18
sculpture too, you practice this kind of practice
00:55:20
much more than the practice when
00:55:22
the inspector said yes, it was possible, that’s why
00:55:25
I would probably recommend everyone to
00:55:27
do it anyway, simply due to the
00:55:30
fact that most likely the controllers will not
00:55:32
understand your complex research,
00:55:36
why are you a certain customer there,
00:55:38
why with your own by your inaction in this
00:55:41
case, you are not causing any harm,
00:55:42
so it’s better to be on the safe side, it’s better to
00:55:44
demand payment,
00:55:49
that is, in a series when there is theory, there is
00:55:51
practice, yes, I’m not sometimes with each other and
00:55:55
out of sight, but again, if your
00:55:57
controllers basically understand the situation, you
00:55:59
can focus on the position of
00:56:02
your norms if you know how they
00:56:04
look
00:56:06
further and the following lowered requirements
00:56:10
are standard contracts standard
00:56:12
contract terms which may also not be
00:56:14
observed in such purchases with warm
00:56:17
contracts we will talk to you again now I will put
00:56:19
another emphasis on this just
00:56:21
for now let’s remember that standard
00:56:24
contracts In these cases, they may be
00:56:27
completely ignored even if they have a
00:56:33
schedule for the execution of the contract, but as a
00:56:36
general rule, the schedule for the execution of the
00:56:38
contract, in principle, requires quite
00:56:39
expensive purchases and we do
00:56:41
not directly conclude a
00:56:43
contract for a long period, therefore, in principle, even the very
00:56:47
fact that Article 3 4 is written that
00:56:50
the contract provides itself with a schedule further there, how
00:56:52
much is deciphered when a schedule is
00:56:55
definitely needed, it says that a
00:56:57
contract execution schedule is not needed in
00:56:59
contracts, even for competitive procurement
00:57:01
that do not satisfy these
00:57:03
conditions, which the bracket here, well, they also
00:57:06
prescribed that the
00:57:10
execution of the contract can also play a role here Well,
00:57:12
as if it’s logical, you need it, write if you have
00:57:15
n’t written it, it means you don’t need it, don’t
00:57:17
need it and haven’t violated anything, the
00:57:20
following inclusion in the contract of a condition about
00:57:23
acceptance, a condition about the procedure and terms for payment
00:57:27
for acceptance, as well as the procedure and time frame for
00:57:30
processing the results,
00:57:32
such a method
00:57:34
can not be included in the terms of
00:57:38
the contract, but this does not mean that it is
00:57:46
not necessary to comply with the requirements that are in the law, that is, we have payment terms
00:57:49
provided for in phase 44 and the payment period for
00:57:54
contracts that are concluded in simple
00:57:56
written form can
00:57:58
currently reach up to 30 days,
00:58:01
as before, that is this old norm
00:58:03
which is 30 days of payment, it continues
00:58:06
to apply, it is from 13 144
00:58:09
13 1 part a 3 4 of article 44, it
00:58:14
still says that in principle there
00:58:16
is such an option, that the payment period can be
00:58:20
up to 30 calendar days and, in
00:58:24
principle, this is where it is in fact, it can still
00:58:26
work like this in contracts,
00:58:28
which are concluded in simple written form;
00:58:30
there are also separate
00:58:32
features; if you are a federal customer,
00:58:34
then probably forget about 30 days
00:58:37
because there are features for
00:58:39
payment of 5 bbs, and if you are federal
00:58:42
budgetary institutions,
00:58:44
then for we may have a 30-day period, but
00:58:48
if you receive federal
00:58:50
budget funds, you have a 10-day payment period due to the
00:58:52
peculiarities of the by-law
00:58:54
regulation, and regarding the terms of payment, I
00:58:57
will say separately that is, if you enter into a
00:59:00
small-volume contract, for example, for example, for one
00:59:03
of these, for example, a small-volume one, then
00:59:05
this does not mean that you can
00:59:07
ever pay as much as a stream, that is, if you did not
00:59:10
write that the payment period is within
00:59:12
thirty, you simply did not write down, but the
00:59:15
actual period must be taken into account in the same way
00:59:18
with acceptance, if you
00:59:21
have written more than once how this acceptance
00:59:22
is carried out, then that’s it equally, those
00:59:27
actually small acceptance rules that exist in
00:59:29
phase 44, they still must be observed,
00:59:32
well, they are for men, but one of them, for
00:59:36
example, is that at the stage before execution and
00:59:38
before acceptance, an examination is carried out, well,
00:59:43
either internally or externally, it is
00:59:45
carried out and even if you purchase a
00:59:48
small volume then this requirement
00:59:50
that there should be an examination somewhere
00:59:52
should still exist even if
00:59:55
it is not written specifically in your contract, that
00:59:58
is, there is such a nuance; this also follows
00:59:59
gender
01:00:01
further
01:00:03
regarding the timing of the preparation of
01:00:06
acceptance documents as a general rule in contracts
01:00:09
that are concluded according to this these are
01:00:10
the grounds there is no electronic actuation
01:00:13
in general, which is why there is no deadline for signing the
01:00:19
acceptance document, well, in fact, there
01:00:21
are no 44 types of us, but there is no direct
01:00:24
requirement for how long
01:00:26
the document is submitted, respectively, and
01:00:29
well, if you don’t write it down in the contract,
01:00:30
it means either this will happen immediately
01:00:33
but when it arrives saw won, or
01:00:37
if you think that this may become a
01:00:39
shared difficulty in obtaining such
01:00:41
documents, then it is better to
01:00:42
write anyway, but these deadlines are determined at the
01:00:44
discretion of the customer, they are not
01:00:46
regulated in any way, you determine how long during what
01:00:48
time the closing documents are needed to be
01:00:51
transferred, you determine yourself,
01:00:52
and again in if this is not
01:00:55
electronic acceptance with electronic acceptance
01:00:58
there is an element regulated by steam and
01:01:00
let's look a little bit at the question the
01:01:03
next point is
01:01:07
the condition about reducing the amount payable to an
01:01:10
individual by the amount of
01:01:12
tax payments that moment what this
01:01:15
condition can really not be
01:01:17
written because you, in principle
01:01:18
initially you know your counterparty, that
01:01:22
is, if your counterparty under such a
01:01:24
contract is a legal entity, then why
01:01:26
write the terms of individuals if it still does
01:01:28
n’t work correctly correctly, but
01:01:32
if you have a contract with an individual,
01:01:35
but here you need to decide in general what the
01:01:37
status of this individual is as an
01:01:40
individual now can act in three
01:01:44
possible
01:01:45
types: it can be an individual in the
01:01:48
traditional sense,
01:01:49
just a citizen, or
01:01:52
it can be a self-employed individual
01:01:55
who applies a tax on a special
01:01:58
tax regime, a tax on
01:01:59
professional income within the framework of 422 z.a.
01:02:04
and maybe
01:02:07
the peculiarity of both the self-employed is that
01:02:12
tax payments and payments as
01:02:16
tax payments, first
01:02:18
they make tax payments independently, that
01:02:20
is, they and the
01:02:24
customer does not act in their
01:02:28
relationship as a tax agent,
01:02:30
it is they themselves who pay taxes and
01:02:33
social contributions social
01:02:36
contributions and ps- on produce and
01:02:38
self-employed and as it is written in
01:02:42
Federal Law 422 wants to deduct does
01:02:45
not want to deduct, well, that is, he
01:02:46
wants to save a pension from let deducts
01:02:49
does not want to save, but with me it’s purely
01:02:52
that is, at the discretion of
01:02:56
the customer does not
01:02:58
make payments to social funds
01:03:01
and taxes and taxes until the names of these two
01:03:04
categories of
01:03:05
individuals, respectively, if you
01:03:08
somehow interact with one of them,
01:03:10
of course, you don’t have to write this
01:03:12
because in fact they themselves act as
01:03:15
such agents in relation to themselves,
01:03:17
but if your counterparty is an individual,
01:03:20
and usually this is in In the original understanding of
01:03:23
an individual, he does not apply
01:03:25
any special tax regimes that are simpler, but
01:03:27
in this situation you really do
01:03:30
n’t have to write to issue 13
01:03:32
percent of the income tax for him,
01:03:34
pay the tax office and
01:03:36
make deductions to the social fund,
01:03:39
social insurance, tanks, circus,
01:03:40
pension fund, these are there 30 with
01:03:42
kopecks of interest at about 40, yes, that’s what
01:03:44
is deducted under the contract, but with an
01:03:47
individual you don’t have to write about it, but it’s
01:03:49
still necessary to deduct,
01:03:54
that is, here
01:03:55
we are, that’s all,
01:03:57
so it will still decrease,
01:04:00
but it will be transferred simply due to the
01:04:02
fact that according to the law not
01:04:04
procurement industry legislation,
01:04:08
well, an individual in this case is in a
01:04:10
weaker position, and therefore a
01:04:13
legal entity that acts as a
01:04:16
customer of services will have to
01:04:18
make all these necessary
01:04:20
deductions,
01:04:21
that’s the story, and in all these
01:04:26
cases listed, the contract can be
01:04:27
concluded in any written form any in
01:04:31
any form provided for by the Civil Code. but
01:04:34
any form provided because but
01:04:36
actually brings us to a simple
01:04:39
written form why
01:04:42
at this moment in time it’s quite funny
01:04:45
just to
01:04:46
have a little fun there was a funny incident
01:04:49
at the start of Federal Law 44 it was
01:04:52
written that the contract is concluded in
01:04:54
any form provided for the player,
01:04:57
including verbally,
01:04:59
then internal financial control
01:05:02
and when finished reading before this proposal,
01:05:04
there was a general panic, some
01:05:06
kind of oral form happened, but then the
01:05:08
intended purpose of the payment is money, then
01:05:11
anyway the intended purpose is in short, you are
01:05:13
boiling, this norm began quickly squabbles 0
01:05:15
and but they slammed, also very curious, they
01:05:17
just wrote they removed this,
01:05:19
including in the oral form a made a link to
01:05:22
g.k. Well, what kind of still
01:05:23
provide for an oral form to do it, it’s
01:05:25
just not so obvious, but it’s still in the
01:05:28
total mass, well, of course, it’s still
01:05:31
worth it, then avoid the ear form, but in
01:05:34
fact, in principle, the cube, the oral
01:05:36
form of the transaction is mainly transactions
01:05:37
of individuals among themselves to a greater extent,
01:05:40
well, for legal entities there are grounds for oral
01:05:43
forms of transactions, but they are still somehow
01:05:47
limited in one way or another in a certain way, it’s very difficult then the
01:05:50
city
01:05:52
proves interesting, they discussed if the transaction was
01:05:54
oral,
01:05:56
so in our case there are
01:06:00
still no tasty transactions it should just be a
01:06:02
written form of the transaction; in fact, it
01:06:03
can be any, but there were clarifications
01:06:06
from the Ministry of Finance, including
01:06:07
this for those who are concerned, yes, this is, in
01:06:10
principle, logical; those who are
01:06:12
concerned about this issue need a written form;
01:06:14
it does not necessarily have to be a paper
01:06:16
called a contract; it can be an
01:06:18
invoice payment, this could be an invoice, an
01:06:20
offer, this could be a check, the Ministry of Finance says
01:06:23
that all this is adequate
01:06:25
evidence of the fact that the transaction was
01:06:27
completed, made in writing,
01:06:29
so someone had any
01:06:32
questions there, there are such explanations if you
01:06:34
search, you can find it,
01:06:37
well, if you just for you, since
01:06:39
this is relevant, all the requirements that
01:06:42
are reduced in relation to the basic
01:06:44
requirements of the content of the contract,
01:06:46
accordingly, all other requirements of
01:06:47
the contract, they still apply
01:06:49
to such purchases, this is also important
01:06:53
to take into account,
01:06:56
let's move on, is it possible to refuse to
01:06:59
conclude a contract,
01:07:01
but as a general rule, if the transaction
01:07:05
is made based on the results of the purchase from
01:07:08
the supplier; general rules, of course, you can
01:07:10
refuse, well, until it is concluded, no one
01:07:13
will even see that we are refusing to conclude this with someone,
01:07:15
so any
01:07:17
party before signing something
01:07:19
to me, of course, can change their mind, but in
01:07:23
cases where we We are talking about procurement by
01:07:24
competitive methods before the
01:07:27
auction competition, quotes, or even if the purchase is
01:07:30
under Part 1290 3 of the article, this is the
01:07:33
supplier’s approval until in electronic form,
01:07:36
here it is already impossible to refuse to conclude a
01:07:38
contract without
01:07:40
objective reasons;
01:07:42
refusal is possible, but only in cases
01:07:46
that will already be
01:07:48
specifically provided for 44 and in this
01:07:51
case, these are in Articles 31 to 44 of the
01:07:54
Federal Law and they are associated with
01:07:57
certain shortcomings that
01:07:59
may arise or could arise on the
01:08:02
side of the
01:08:03
person with whom the contract was planned to be concluded,
01:08:06
for example, here they are listed
01:08:09
if it is established that this participant does
01:08:13
not correspond to the single or
01:08:15
additional requirement or
01:08:17
universal in the tribune and universal
01:08:19
pride qualification, non-compliance with these
01:08:23
requirements can be established in this
01:08:24
way, that is, it is clear that the applications
01:08:26
were checked and inspected that everything is enough,
01:08:29
what is expected, etc., but it
01:08:33
happens that something is fake but in
01:08:37
reality it is completely different, that is, a declaration must be
01:08:39
written and then it turned out that this was
01:08:43
not true,
01:08:44
or for example,
01:08:47
or for example, or for example, there was a license
01:08:51
for we were purchasing some kind of
01:08:55
activity that
01:08:57
requires a license to perform, and
01:08:59
accordingly, everything seemed to be in order with it, but
01:09:02
at the time of consideration of the
01:09:04
application, they also checked the license everything is
01:09:07
fine, yes, they
01:09:11
looked at the valid license registries, it’s not all
01:09:13
right, really, but at
01:09:15
the time of signing the contract, something suddenly
01:09:18
went wrong with the
01:09:20
contract manager or service specialist and he
01:09:22
went back to this license registry and
01:09:24
you see that the license was canceled or
01:09:27
suspended before, well, that is, he all seemed to have
01:09:30
lost the opportunity to fulfill his
01:09:32
obligations because it required a
01:09:35
special permit, and
01:09:38
if this is established, then this will be
01:09:40
a reason to refuse to conclude a contract
01:09:42
for these participants, another question yogi no
01:09:44
mini hatch not this question is, as it were,
01:09:46
voluntary
01:09:47
because there is no obligation at the stage of
01:09:51
concluding a contract to double
01:09:53
-check after the commission
01:09:56
whether this participant still meets
01:09:58
the requirements or does not comply, that is, these are
01:10:01
cases that, well, let’s say
01:10:04
in an emergency form,
01:10:06
can help stop further problems
01:10:10
before the contract is
01:10:13
concluded, that is if it is
01:10:15
established somehow suddenly, then it
01:10:19
will become a reason for refusal, but it will not be
01:10:21
established, it means behind the contract and
01:10:23
there in the course of fulfilling obligations under the
01:10:25
contract, it will become clear that it is not suitable and
01:10:27
then when it will be terminated,
01:10:31
so here is the moment to simply quickly
01:10:34
solve this problem so that there is an
01:10:36
opportunity at least there is the same
01:10:38
second thing to turn to and
01:10:40
quickly Perry will conclude that there is no such
01:10:42
simple drawdown in terms of
01:10:44
fulfillment of obligations under the contract, that is,
01:10:47
this is such an emergency
01:10:48
response measure and, in general,
01:10:51
it is applied if necessary, again there is an
01:10:53
obligation to double-check again
01:10:55
there is no compliance the same the most important thing concerns the
01:10:57
information about the availability of information in the RNP, that
01:11:00
is, once again the register at the stage of signing the
01:11:03
contract, double-check the obligations;
01:11:08
if it suddenly turns out that it is
01:11:10
still there, this will be a reason to
01:11:12
refuse to conclude a contract at the
01:11:14
stage just before the conclusion, this is important, that
01:11:18
is, if it comes up and in during
01:11:21
execution it’s a different matter, but if at the
01:11:23
stage of concluding the contract it turns out
01:11:26
that he was war and hit, then
01:11:29
let’s not conclude if the requirement for
01:11:31
absence was established in the RNP, if we
01:11:35
establish that he provided me with
01:11:36
some reliable information as part of the
01:11:39
application, also to confirm the fact
01:11:41
reliability, as a rule, requires a
01:11:43
certain amount of time, and this
01:11:45
may be at the stage of consideration of applications,
01:11:47
taking into account the fact that this short
01:11:49
enough period of time, we
01:11:51
may not be able to find out something
01:11:54
simply from time, but the planet is
01:11:56
signing a contract, and there is already there,
01:11:58
for example, a plant - the manufacturer replied that
01:12:00
yes, they lied, there are no such products, in
01:12:02
general, they produce the same thing,
01:12:05
that is, this plant indicated
01:12:08
that their products, that is, it was possible to
01:12:10
identify that it was they, and
01:12:12
unofficially answered that no, they
01:12:14
lied, there is no such company,
01:12:15
characteristics
01:12:18
but there are also certain risks, but
01:12:21
these
01:12:22
risks are associated with who lived the plant or is it
01:12:25
like that too,
01:12:29
this is a basic set that, in
01:12:31
principle, can work out for each customer in
01:12:33
some situation, in essence
01:12:35
it is a participant’s non-compliance with the requirements
01:12:37
established or an unreliable
01:12:40
average composition of the application Tatyana, well, somehow
01:12:42
characterizes in a certain way that
01:12:44
this person could not get the right not to
01:12:48
disappear, could not get a contract and
01:12:50
enter, so I will say that the
01:12:52
medicine for medicines
01:12:55
has certain features that are not associated with
01:12:58
any medicines only with medicines
01:12:59
later than LP. here’s an
01:13:01
interesting story right here
01:13:03
because remember I said that
01:13:05
NVP drugs are purchased taking into
01:13:09
account the specifics, in particular
01:13:11
pricing regulation,
01:13:13
because the manufacturer of these drugs
01:13:16
must come and the maximum selling
01:13:17
prices must be registered, indicates the
01:13:20
maximum price and cannot be sold to the market at a higher price than this price
01:13:27
There are also specifics related to
01:13:29
wholesale surcharges from VAT,
01:13:34
pricing, I don’t want to load everyone with
01:13:37
these questions so that it’s clear, but
01:13:40
because I want to give a terrible example of
01:13:42
medicines and what are the consequences
01:13:48
if the manufacturer himself comes to
01:13:50
participate in the purchase, and such a practice
01:13:52
actually exists, produce how they enter
01:13:55
participate themselves from itself not through the market in
01:13:57
the morning, but the
01:13:58
manufacturer at the auction can offer a
01:14:00
price
01:14:01
lower or the same as in the register of
01:14:04
maximum selling prices
01:14:06
no longer for
01:14:09
medicines, we are playing mainly an auction
01:14:11
because they walk the black list for themselves,
01:14:13
that is, there may be a quotation, that
01:14:16
is, not a competition Basically, this is an auction
01:14:18
purchase, and as you and I know well, in
01:14:20
an auction it goes down step by step and
01:14:24
I can’t jump over my head so that I
01:14:26
fall, right here you are right there where my
01:14:28
limit is the selling price, that’s why
01:14:30
there, depending on
01:14:32
how many competitors came, they are there something
01:14:35
was offered there, the price that turned out to be
01:14:38
such a turned out and often the price
01:14:41
that according to the results of the auction
01:14:42
turns out to be
01:14:45
higher, it may be less, but it is not the same,
01:14:49
not exactly the same as if
01:14:52
the accomplice was launched by Nastya, and if the price
01:14:55
actually turns out to be more than the
01:14:57
registered manufacturer, then above
01:15:00
it is you who signed this contract,
01:15:01
the rule appears about the protocol for
01:15:04
agreeing on the contract price where the
01:15:06
manufacturer makes an additional
01:15:08
discount until, well, either the maximum prices
01:15:12
are registered, or if he is ready to
01:15:14
offer something lower, then lower, but at least to
01:15:17
the maximum, he must reduce it,
01:15:19
otherwise there is a risk and this is the
01:15:23
situation that in fact, in practice
01:15:25
it was definitely true, I only saw two such cases, it’s
01:15:29
just difficult to establish a little how the
01:15:32
whole thing might end in general, something like this
01:15:34
happened that the price was not
01:15:37
adjusted, the contract was concluded,
01:15:39
and the worst thing was that they
01:15:43
executed and paid for it, and the
01:15:46
worst thing is that in fact there
01:15:50
was a contract concluded on conditions
01:15:53
that are not provided for by
01:15:54
law, which already constitutes an
01:15:56
offense, and also the execution of
01:15:59
such a contract entailed
01:16:02
additional expenditure of budgetary funds,
01:16:04
they actually overpaid,
01:16:07
and
01:16:08
it’s interesting that responsibility for
01:16:11
this type of offense
01:16:16
can be brought to administrative responsibility
01:16:20
h4 persons,
01:16:23
well concluding a contract is a mutual
01:16:26
action, if the contract was concluded, then
01:16:30
they are both at fault, both parties
01:16:34
deliberately went for it and it turns out
01:16:37
that the customer can be brought to the legal entity of the
01:16:40
customer as an official and
01:16:43
his supplier as a legal entity and as
01:16:48
conditionally we must sing, that is, answer from the
01:16:51
legal entity, someone acted in concluding this
01:16:53
contract, these four persons can be
01:16:55
held accountable, and what is the sanction
01:16:58
there?
01:17:17
reimburse
01:17:19
them more, the overpayment was full of a million rubles
01:17:22
and
01:17:23
now calculate how much in the end the
01:17:25
budget is
01:17:29
2 million
01:17:36
so those who buy medicines those who
01:17:39
buy medicines later he
01:17:41
pays here right here it is advisable to trace
01:17:43
why because even if this
01:17:45
happens, then in principle everyone should
01:17:47
understand that something bad can happen for
01:17:50
everyone in the second case, not 4 people were
01:17:52
brought to justice, in my opinion
01:17:54
only 2 were fined, if
01:17:57
I’m not mistaken, but there it was somehow easier
01:17:58
to resolve out of the mind, there were fewer, but then
01:18:01
this case stuck right in my memory
01:18:04
what is this is very indicative of how much
01:18:07
money can be returned to the budget later, I will return
01:18:11
more and more grounds for refusal, in
01:18:13
principle there are no and everything else is a
01:18:16
reason for such a contract to conclude a refusal to
01:18:20
conclude a contract, it is drawn up
01:18:22
in a certain way, which is also
01:18:24
regulated 44 and, in principle, there are
01:18:28
no adjustments here in relation to
01:18:30
last year there was no we need to
01:18:31
draw up a protocol of refusal there will be a
01:18:34
spot laundress there was a protocol of refusal to
01:18:37
conclude a contract within one
01:18:39
working day it is drawn up from the day the
01:18:41
fact that caused the
01:18:44
refusal is identified and within 2 working days and is
01:18:49
posted on the day during the working
01:18:51
day from date of discovery of the fact and within
01:18:53
two working days from the date of signing it is
01:18:55
also sent to
01:18:57
the winner; in fact, about the direction, it is
01:19:01
not said how this happens, but if it is not
01:19:04
said, then we turn to the
01:19:05
provisions of civil law
01:19:06
on proper notification,
01:19:08
well, we send a letter with notification
01:19:10
in parallel, of course, you can
01:19:13
duplicate the email, but
01:19:14
just send it by email,
01:19:16
this is an inappropriate phenomenon and,
01:19:18
accordingly, this is a certain risk, that
01:19:20
is, there is also a letter, we notify that in
01:19:24
this protocol you need to indicate information
01:19:25
about the identification number of the application for this
01:19:29
winners, now we will
01:19:31
not enter the name before the identifier,
01:19:34
then the fact that is the basis
01:19:37
for refusal, that is, why, which of these
01:19:39
from all of the above was
01:19:41
the reason and the details of the documents
01:19:44
confirming the legality of the
01:19:47
decision to refuse, but the details of the
01:19:49
documents will only be here
01:19:50
when they actually exist for you, if for
01:19:54
example he is in the RNP val, then
01:19:58
well, as if there are no special documents, there is no
01:20:01
market are open, yes, yes, please,
01:20:04
everything is publicly available,
01:20:07
of course, you can’t make a screenshot or
01:20:09
upload a certificate there and attach it, well,
01:20:12
in general, in this case it wo
01:20:13
n’t be necessary, but documents here in
01:20:16
general can take place when we
01:20:18
prove the unreliability of the information, yes, that
01:20:22
is we found out that this is that the
01:20:24
information is unreliable, then as
01:20:26
we found out, this information is
01:20:28
attached, respectively, if the
01:20:30
contract was terminated with this person, then
01:20:33
we can transfer the contract to person
01:20:36
number two and, accordingly, conclude a
01:20:39
contract with him in the same manner as was
01:20:41
provided for concluding a contract with
01:20:43
the winner, if he also turns out to be
01:20:46
somehow different, then you can
01:20:47
move on from third to third, and so
01:20:50
on, and about and so on, here
01:20:52
there is also one nuance, but because
01:20:57
the focus has also shifted and the rules that regulated
01:21:00
there before the contract
01:21:04
can be transferred It may not be very obvious, but in
01:21:06
article 43 there is now a feature,
01:21:08
using an example, I’ll tell him to understand it, but
01:21:11
let’s say there are 5 procurement participants in total up to 5,
01:21:14
so they won back the standings
01:21:15
first place 2 3
01:21:18
it is logical that the contract goes first 1 if the
01:21:22
first one evaded there or the first ones does not
01:21:25
correspond refused to conclude a
01:21:27
contract then you have
01:21:29
the right to go to the second customer has the
01:21:33
right right 2 could refuse earlier now it
01:21:39
cannot seem 2 that is, he is obliged to
01:21:41
conclude if an order came to him if
01:21:43
2 refused then he follows the first
01:21:46
there freedom and then the customer has the right
01:21:48
think and tag the third if the customer
01:21:51
says yes, I want to contact the third,
01:21:53
the customer turns to the third and the third
01:21:56
also cannot refuse, and if he does
01:22:00
not sign, he follows these two
01:22:03
in the RNP and what happens next if
01:22:06
the customer wants to contact the fourth,
01:22:09
he can contact to the fourth and 4
01:22:11
will also be obliged to sign or also
01:22:13
follows this, but but 1 2 3 places
01:22:18
do not have the option to submit an application after the
01:22:20
protocol and top ones, and for the fourth and
01:22:22
lower places they have the right to refuse to
01:22:26
conclude a contract, well, they
01:22:29
cannot refuse, there is only one way to
01:22:31
withdraw the application
01:22:32
but if they have not withdrawn the application, then
01:22:36
they are waiting for something else, and then if the application has
01:22:39
not been withdrawn, they are also obliged to
01:22:42
sign the contract,
01:22:46
but the customer has all these cases of
01:22:50
sending the second and subsequent draft contract to the second and subsequent
01:22:52
draft of the contract, this is a right,
01:22:55
but if this right was exercised by
01:22:58
the customer, this corresponds to the
01:22:59
obligation to
01:23:01
sign contract
01:23:04
this is such an innovation after optimization
01:23:08
amendments
01:23:09
this teaches us
01:23:12
take a break here

Description:

On this page you can download the media «Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru» highest quality possible WITHOUT any restrictions on the number of downloads or download speed.

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Институт госзакупок | www.roszakupki.ru"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.