background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "13. Вращение сферы"

input logo icon
Video tags
|

Video tags

Matlab
Mathworks
Simulink
матлаб
симулинк
алексей савватеев
леонард эйлер
математика
высшая математика
наука
алексей_савватеев
леонард_эйлер
высшая_математика
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:01
[music]
00:00:06
rotation of a sphere Euler’s next theorem in
00:00:10
general something called the
00:00:13
hole theorem is dozens if not hundreds of
00:00:15
statements of various branches of
00:00:18
mathematics Euler’s next theorem
00:00:21
sounds like this any motion of a sphere that
00:00:28
preserves orientation is a
00:00:31
rotation around a certain axis through a
00:00:34
certain angle
00:00:37
any now I will explain all the terms
00:00:39
any the movement of a sphere that maintains
00:00:49
its orientation is rotation around a
00:01:04
certain axis at a certain angle, which means
00:01:15
an explanation let’s start drawing our
00:01:17
sphere, in fact, each of you can
00:01:20
take just a soccer ball, forget
00:01:22
the firmware, well, well, or a soccer ball is
00:01:24
such a saint
00:01:25
if with this rubber and start twisting it, as it were.
00:01:27
twist this way and that if you
00:01:28
unscrew it like this decorated it so as soon as
00:01:31
you record some
00:01:32
movements of the football but of this
00:01:35
ball of ours you can actually
00:01:37
see two fixed points on
00:01:39
opposite sides of each other
00:01:41
around which there was actually just a
00:01:43
rotation quite amazing the result
00:01:45
actually you can’t avoid
00:01:47
this, you can
00:01:49
get away with it as you like, but as a result,
00:01:51
as a result of all these exercises,
00:01:55
it turns out that some two points
00:01:57
still remained in their places and everything
00:01:58
was spinning around the axis that passes through them,
00:02:00
they will be diametrically
00:02:01
opposite, this is also so visual
00:02:04
but very difficult an amazing fact,
00:02:06
absolutely a fact that belongs to me,
00:02:08
so let's
00:02:10
develop this science a little, what is movement,
00:02:12
movement is a transformation that
00:02:14
preserves the distance, simply that is,
00:02:15
formally speaking, and of from the sphere, the sphere
00:02:24
is such that for any x y
00:02:26
from our sphere, the distance from x to y
00:02:31
is equal to the distance from f from x
00:02:35
to y from y, well, here we need to explain what
00:02:40
distance means, how is it most convenient
00:02:42
to reconcile on a sphere, distances can of course be
00:02:43
measured, but usually the idea of ​​an
00:02:46
angular angular measure of distance is accepted, that is,
00:02:48
distance is an angle if I took the center
00:02:51
of the sphere and headed to these two points along
00:02:54
radius, then this angle is, as it were, a
00:02:57
distance; if the angle is zero, then
00:02:59
the points coincide; if the angle is 180,
00:03:02
then they are opposite, and that is, the
00:03:04
maximum achievable
00:03:06
distance between points on a sphere; but if the angles
00:03:08
are equal, it is hidden that the distance here
00:03:10
will also be equal, that is correspondence
00:03:11
the triangles will be equal, which means
00:03:13
the distance is an angle of 1 century and I am not an
00:03:17
angle or that the same is the
00:03:20
shortest path traversed on a sphere
00:03:22
between these two points
00:03:23
and the shortest path is always an arc of a great
00:03:26
circle,
00:03:27
that is, if you want to get from
00:03:29
some point on the sphere at some point
00:03:31
the sphere is different, then you need to turn
00:03:34
to the center of the earth for help,
00:03:35
here and on the version of the earth we
00:03:37
are at the center of the sphere, draw the
00:03:39
plane of the only one that passes
00:03:41
through these three points and it will carve out
00:03:43
exactly that same king the shortest path
00:03:45
on the surface spheres, but there will be
00:03:48
two paths, one long and the other short, but
00:03:49
it should give a short one, if by chance these
00:03:51
two paths
00:03:52
coincided in length, this means that the starting
00:03:55
points were opposite and through the
00:03:57
center of the earth there
00:03:58
actually passes an infinite
00:04:00
number of two bones, which these
00:04:02
three connect together by extinguishing on
00:04:04
they lie on the same straight line,
00:04:05
but then all these paths are also
00:04:07
the same, it’s just the entire diameter,
00:04:08
well, well, not the diameter, as it were, the maximum
00:04:10
distance on a sphere, that’s how it’s the
00:04:11
floor of the equator, let’s say like that, that’s it
00:04:14
then iv is called
00:04:19
movement movement that is, it’s like
00:04:21
not only would it not glue different points
00:04:23
together into an obviously mutually significant
00:04:24
correspondence, in fact, it is strictly necessary to
00:04:27
prove that it
00:04:29
exists for any point on the sphere
00:04:32
since the one that goes into it
00:04:35
proves this to us, well, God bless him, let’s
00:04:37
leave it alone in general, from the fact that
00:04:39
it and the movement is the following, it is a one-
00:04:41
to-one correspondence between points,
00:04:42
as if it
00:04:44
one-to-one transforms the points of the
00:04:47
sphere, that is, different ones go into different ones,
00:04:49
and for any point on the sphere, what is it that
00:04:51
went into it, this is some kind of
00:04:53
strange somersault, well and now it is argued
00:04:56
that in fact, this
00:04:58
somersault property is that a
00:05:00
certain axis is taken and we simply make a rotation
00:05:03
around this axis at a certain
00:05:04
angle of rotation,
00:05:06
well, note not at all, as if before the
00:05:09
preparatory questions, I have not yet
00:05:11
explained what
00:05:12
orientation-preserving is look again, here it’s
00:05:18
easier for me to turn to the intuition of
00:05:21
orientation, this is a very complex thing
00:05:22
of mathematics, there are three different
00:05:24
definitions of how to introduce it, it’s
00:05:25
always some kind of linear algebra, these are the
00:05:27
legs of the determinants of their signs, that is, this is
00:05:29
something that can be simply explained, but
00:05:33
not strictly so Here’s a loose explanation:
00:05:37
we take our sphere and paint it, and
00:05:40
this side, for example, is blue,
00:05:43
and the inside of the sphere is in, but on the inside,
00:05:46
let’s say we got inside the
00:05:48
sphere and we do
00:05:50
n’t eat the inside, we decorate it with green, and we
00:05:54
need it so that when transforming f,
00:05:57
green does not become blue, that is, it is not
00:05:59
turned inside out, but how do
00:06:01
you imagine yourself turned inside out? Or, for
00:06:04
example, I take a circle here, I
00:06:08
fix it entirely, so it remains in
00:06:11
place and all the points on top go through.
00:06:15
from below and vice versa, that is, I turn
00:06:17
this hat inside out like this
00:06:18
completely, that is, this whole green one
00:06:20
will come up, it passes through the
00:06:22
surface opposite it from the inside, it does not
00:06:25
become externally, it also
00:06:27
becomes externally from the inside, a rose is such a fold, here are the
00:06:30
races and
00:06:31
received the sphere also again cerrado like this
00:06:34
turned inside out, we look at
00:06:36
the inside now as an outside, but we
00:06:38
need to preserve the orientation
00:06:40
from this, in particular, I need to have
00:06:42
only one property, and those that preserve
00:06:45
the orientation from mappings is that if
00:06:47
some kind of equator remains
00:06:51
in place, then all the spheres too must
00:06:52
remain in place, that's just one
00:06:54
property that is generally quite
00:06:55
obvious, yes, that is, if you roughly speaking,
00:06:57
if you took a soccer ball by the lower back, by the
00:07:01
waist, which we ask for the thickest thing in it,
00:07:04
just if you took it by
00:07:07
the waist, then you will move it from its place already
00:07:09
you can’t with the principle of preserving the distance, except for
00:07:12
this turning out,
00:07:14
you can’t move it; all the
00:07:16
other points are also fixed
00:07:18
forever, if it’s fixed, then it’s not
00:07:20
that it turns back and forth,
00:07:22
namely . at a point like this, all of it is
00:07:25
fixed and nothing else. also
00:07:27
cannot change her position
00:07:29
because she must remain at the same
00:07:31
distance from everyone else and
00:07:33
for her unity the option is
00:07:34
to jump here, well, as if at least one.
00:07:37
soon here, it’s easy to understand that everyone
00:07:39
else will also jump there on the other
00:07:40
side, this is a turning
00:07:41
inside out,
00:07:43
but this is the only intuitive
00:07:46
fact that I will use as an
00:07:48
axiom, here you need to understand that I
00:07:50
buried the strict definition of orientation under the rug,
00:07:52
so you buried it under the rug and
00:07:55
now, based on this principle, I
00:07:58
begin to build a certain science,
00:08:01
our first statement is that if
00:08:06
I have 2 points that are diametrically
00:08:09
opposite and both remain in
00:08:11
place, then the entire circumference of the great circle
00:08:14
should also be
00:08:15
in place, well, what is called where and
00:08:18
kindergarten look at it this point
00:08:20
should be at the same distance
00:08:21
as it was from this, that is, on this
00:08:24
circle, and at the same distance
00:08:26
as it was from this, that is, to this
00:08:27
circle, but it cannot remain
00:08:29
at the same time on this and on this circle, well,
00:08:32
at least Having gone somewhere, she
00:08:34
can no longer stay; she can stay with at least one of
00:08:36
this circle; therefore,
00:08:38
the requirement that this point remain
00:08:39
at the same distance from here and here
00:08:40
means that it must remain in
00:08:42
place, and the same can be said about any other point
00:08:44
that is, and
00:08:45
if they are opposite, then these two
00:08:47
circles, imagine what will
00:08:50
happen to them if these points were about the
00:08:51
false type, in fact, these two
00:08:53
circles from the 1st floor are
00:08:55
viewed from different sides, but this one
00:08:57
and this one are very important, this is very important
00:09:01
building up geometric intuition is
00:09:03
terribly important, even there were some
00:09:06
studies somewhere around pedagogically which I do
00:09:08
n’t believe in a damn thing, but in this case,
00:09:10
that something similar to that the coolest
00:09:13
skill of a child is the skill of the space
00:09:15
of imagination, but in general a person is
00:09:17
very strong helps in life in general,
00:09:20
if these were opposite,
00:09:21
we wouldn’t say that she stayed on this
00:09:23
circle, but could go to any point of
00:09:24
this circle,
00:09:25
but if they are not opposite, these are these,
00:09:27
surround them, intersect exactly one point,
00:09:28
they touch me, and in this this. This is the
00:09:31
one that you first considered,
00:09:33
so there’s no escape for everyone
00:09:37
else. this diameter is also not suitable and therefore the
00:09:40
whole sphere itself also has nowhere to go, that
00:09:41
is, in fact, that we really
00:09:44
showed that
00:09:45
so our our postulate which we
00:09:49
put forward as a postulate because I didn’t
00:09:51
prove it very strictly
00:09:52
if the movement
00:09:56
f well, preserving orientation to
00:10:01
preserving
00:10:02
orientation leaves in place
00:10:10
2
00:10:12
non-opposite points a and btf is
00:10:22
identically equal to ai di ai di this
00:10:27
transformation is nothing to
00:10:28
do nothing to do nothing
00:10:33
identical transformation
00:10:34
identical transformations,
00:10:37
that is, this means that
00:10:39
no rotation really took place,
00:10:40
no movement was made with the sphere if two
00:10:43
points like this remained on places,
00:10:44
you would have the rest of the sphere and don’t excuse me, well,
00:10:48
we’ve talked about this postulate well, and now we
00:10:51
use it to prove
00:10:54
Euler’s theorem, the wire is now straight, here’s how to
00:10:58
do it, how can we get a let’s
00:11:02
start the situation, here we took some
00:11:09
one point one and
00:11:10
and let's see where she went, if we were
00:11:16
wildly lucky, then she went into herself,
00:11:20
and I also have a photo, this is the first interesting
00:11:23
case that we will consider that
00:11:26
such a thing exists. that is, there are two
00:11:29
different cases 22 different cases
00:11:38
1 exists and from our sphere such that
00:11:44
I photo is equal to and motionless and the second
00:11:49
case, well, as if it does not exist in
00:11:54
reality and we will prove that this cannot be this is the
00:11:55
second case does not exist such and
00:12:01
but this will come to a contradiction this will come
00:12:08
to a contradiction but for now we will consider the
00:12:10
first case, which is actually none.
00:12:12
there was found which drives all this with
00:12:15
this somersault, by
00:12:16
the way, science for astronauts, you
00:12:18
understand, yes, the astronauts are studying the quaternions of the
00:12:20
quattro and the aversion of the sphere is not a
00:12:23
run. I seriously heard from one of
00:12:25
his mathematical colleagues that the
00:12:27
astronauts have a three-day course in the theory of
00:12:29
quaternions because Potter does not
00:12:32
describe rotation. space, how
00:12:33
exactly I will tell you a little later, but
00:12:35
not in this video, so here it is, but understand that the
00:12:39
rotation of the sphere is what an
00:12:41
astronaut needs, that there is no such thing, it’s up and
00:12:45
down, yes, you’re hanging out like this, but
00:12:47
I won’t say how that’s what
00:12:50
you have here.
00:12:51
and so she remained in place, I claim
00:12:56
that then her antipode, I designated it like this: the
00:12:59
antipode is the opposite of
00:13:01
Iran's sphere.
00:13:02
being in the country of origin, the sphere is
00:13:04
here somewhere, and with a line I, as a child, I
00:13:07
studied where the antipode of Moscow turned out that
00:13:09
somewhere away from New Zealand, not
00:13:11
very far in the sea, the sea is somewhere around 1000
00:13:14
kondrat of New Zealand, which were accepted
00:13:17
then also on place, that is, it turns out
00:13:20
that this is also true and why and because
00:13:25
look at the distance from point a to the point
00:13:34
with the line is equal to 180 degrees and it should be
00:13:39
preserved during movement therefore the
00:13:45
distance from f from a to f from the aes with the line is
00:13:49
also equal to 180 degrees this is the maximum
00:13:53
possible distance
00:13:54
but also of a tight oao
00:13:57
therefore the distance from a to f from the AES
00:14:01
line should also be equal to 180 20 in
00:14:04
other words, the rush remained in place and with the
00:14:07
line it was the opposite. into
00:14:09
which the line went
00:14:11
should also be at a distance of 180
00:14:13
degrees from this point which is the gnome
00:14:15
because their images should also be but at a
00:14:17
distance of 180 degrees there is only
00:14:20
one.
00:14:21
namely, the line itself, which means it is also
00:14:23
motionless, and all the
00:14:25
other points closer to the point could not have changed, but we
00:14:27
would not have preserved the distance. of
00:14:37
any movement there is
00:14:39
only an even number of motionless ones. there
00:14:41
can’t be anything, but either there are two at once
00:14:43
or there are four at once, well, and
00:14:46
as if in this case, I’m just
00:14:47
proving specifically it turned out that
00:14:49
the points are like antipodes, they
00:14:51
move in pairs, that is, any movement of
00:14:52
the sphere is a movement at the same time until the
00:14:55
points can fall and in fact,
00:14:56
honestly, there is, as it were, for many pairs of
00:15:00
points of opposite Ferret masses,
00:15:01
there is a special name for the
00:15:03
projective plane, but
00:15:05
we won’t talk about this now, it’s complicated, that is,
00:15:08
any movement of the sphere
00:15:09
induces the movement of the projective
00:15:10
plane, but we return to this
00:15:15
situation, then then, in principle, it’s
00:15:18
clear because here
00:15:22
on this axis I have two points that are motionless and
00:15:25
opposite,
00:15:26
then it’s clear that each point moves
00:15:30
strictly along a circle that is around
00:15:33
the corresponding one, that is, this is 7, let’s say
00:15:36
it’s north-south to the very northern and southern
00:15:37
poles, then we’ll just call all the others
00:15:39
points they must remain at the same distance
00:15:41
100 from these two, which means they are
00:15:44
moving along these circles, how to
00:15:46
prove that this is really a rotation
00:15:47
at the same angle and not just that
00:15:49
. from this circle I went 5
00:15:52
degrees in and z and immediately 20 why this
00:15:54
can’t be so let’s understand this from
00:15:57
I’m like this because look what I’m
00:16:00
going to do now I’m going to an unknown movement
00:16:04
right now purely
00:16:06
algebraic logic to annoy their theory of
00:16:09
groups purity look how this
00:16:11
mapping is followed by a
00:16:15
rotation to the corners
00:16:16
where fe well, for example, this is this
00:16:19
film, that is, I take some point
00:16:21
b it is sent here to FSB and this
00:16:23
distance is equal to fi angular distance and
00:16:26
again and then I apply rotations it
00:16:28
back the angle is minus vi, that is, if
00:16:30
it went in a positive direction, it
00:16:32
positively resembles and
00:16:34
counterclockwise is always yes, but in this case it’s not
00:16:36
very clear what this means, that it’s a
00:16:38
sphere, but how will you look at it from above,
00:16:41
look at this sphere, look from above, and then
00:16:44
in the opposite direction we will twist it
00:16:46
and look, the rotation saves the point, but
00:16:51
of course yes, because it
00:16:54
was done around the same race and it saves.
00:16:57
according to the survey condition, because around the
00:16:59
same race,
00:17:00
but attention, well, not a turn in the sense, but
00:17:04
this composition will also
00:17:06
accordingly save the point and this
00:17:09
saves the years, they save it, but attention, it
00:17:12
also saves point b because when
00:17:16
displaying f&b, she somehow went to the FSB
00:17:20
somehow the kulbi there and when
00:17:22
turning came back because I
00:17:24
specially picked it up at that angle
00:17:25
to compensate for this
00:17:27
thing, so it would be the same,
00:17:29
but a and b are no longer opposite in
00:17:33
construction, which
00:17:34
means this mapping is
00:17:39
identical, it doesn’t change anything
00:17:41
because she left two points in
00:17:43
place, there is some beautiful logic, that
00:17:46
is, I made another movement that was familiar to me,
00:17:49
familiar to me, and found out that
00:17:51
performing them one after another leads to an
00:17:54
identical
00:17:55
display, but if so, then it is clear that it
00:17:59
exists and rfi because just again let
00:18:02
's apply, for example, from that side now
00:18:04
also shipyards
00:18:06
and this is the same as candy, apply
00:18:09
rfi well, and this is harp and this is f
00:18:15
because these two reduced
00:18:16
transformations can be applied
00:18:18
associatively, this is separately so beautiful,
00:18:21
beautiful, you can also get away with any
00:18:22
transformation in general, any mappings
00:18:24
have by the property that
00:18:26
a f.f. asterisk asterisk right there
00:18:30
the composition, no matter how you place the brackets, the
00:18:32
result will be the same because it’s
00:18:34
easy to follow how each
00:18:36
of the points to which we apply this
00:18:39
mapping, how it runs after us, here it is, just
00:18:42
in the beginning with the help of yours, then that’s why it’s
00:18:43
always here in Hebrew from right to left
00:18:45
because we need to substitute
00:18:50
this starting point at the beginning here
00:18:52
then here so we get
00:18:55
yes p minus feast of from and well, it just
00:18:58
turns out that if we write
00:19:00
off the second
00:19:03
transformation performed on the left, then this
00:19:05
will happen the first is carried out, this is the
00:19:06
second, this is why the transformation is always
00:19:09
performed from right to left, you just
00:19:10
need to get used to it, well, that is, in
00:19:14
fact, the case when we have a fixed one
00:19:15
. we have sorted it out,
00:19:17
it remains to deal with the case when there are
00:19:20
supposedly no fixed points and
00:19:23
actually bring this case to a contradiction, in
00:19:24
fact,
00:19:25
well, let’s draw sulfur, let there be no
00:19:33
such htf from and equals and look what I’m
00:19:41
doing, I now do the following, which means I
00:19:48
take some kind of a
00:19:50
and I'm looking at where I'm taking the photo,
00:19:53
let's choose to choose any
00:19:58
point a from c 2
00:20:03
let f from a which as as as we already
00:20:08
understand the damage on piston 1. don’t
00:20:10
go overboard, let me, here they are exactly, and
00:20:13
her image and we’ll draw it here before
00:20:18
we’ll draw the image, now I do the following,
00:20:22
I draw a diameter perpendicular to
00:20:27
this segment, well, a curved segment on
00:20:30
this one, that is, I’m now taking it to call the
00:20:38
perpendicular bisector plane
00:20:39
plane of the median perpendicular,
00:20:41
that is, I connect them, draw
00:20:43
a perpendicular to it, it cuts out for me a
00:20:46
plane passing through the center of the earth,
00:20:48
naturally through the center of the sphere, for
00:20:50
obvious reasons, I designate the
00:20:53
plane through as much and make
00:20:58
transformations, look, I’m proving
00:21:01
something about rotation, but I make
00:21:03
inversions from
00:21:04
on ngu I need to go beyond the limit, in order to
00:21:07
prove Euler's theorem, you need
00:21:12
to add turning inside out to your own culbis, that is, a transformation that does not
00:21:14
preserve the orientation,
00:21:15
without this it will be much
00:21:17
more difficult to prove and so I transform, I have
00:21:21
one with aj, this is turning
00:21:24
inside out relative to a given plane,
00:21:26
well, that's what I already told you
00:21:29
about growing inside out relative to the
00:21:34
plane, so that’s what I’m doing,
00:21:42
accordingly, its image then
00:21:45
f on c aj already saves the point and the fns
00:21:52
already saves the point and correctly it
00:21:55
saves.
00:21:56
so great, now I’m working with this
00:22:00
transformation that is already
00:22:03
saved.
00:22:04
and prime the next move I
00:22:09
used to reverse it and now I’ll also do
00:22:12
a somersault but I’ll also do some twisting
00:22:15
but it will be a different twisting
00:22:17
absolutely means what I now want to
00:22:20
do and I’m considering some
00:22:26
other point b I some point b and
00:22:31
such that it was not opposite to
00:22:34
so let it be. sphere is not equal, well, in short,
00:22:42
unequal as much as a line, that is, not the antipode of
00:22:45
the point, but let’s choose a point that is
00:22:48
not a like then it remains at a
00:22:52
distance from b to a equal to the distance from the
00:23:01
application this is from as much as f
00:23:04
this is double
00:23:07
from bks as much as f from
00:23:11
a but this is a because we built it that way,
00:23:15
we specially turned it inside out
00:23:16
so that a returns to its place, so it
00:23:19
should be the same as from this one,
00:23:24
yes and this is simple, then I’ll replace it, that is,
00:23:27
the result of applying this
00:23:29
mapping kb
00:23:31
leaves b on the same circle on
00:23:33
which it was in relation to the point
00:23:36
ike and and infinite which passes
00:23:39
through it towards the antipode
00:23:41
and with the line like this, now the
00:23:46
fatal number is executed, let it be
00:23:50
c this one. let it be the purpose, I draw the
00:23:54
perpendicular bisector, here is
00:24:02
the order of what happened, I took and drew
00:24:11
a plane that passes through a and with
00:24:16
a line, the center of the earth and the midpoint between b and c, the middle of the
00:24:21
arc, here is the right angle,
00:24:24
here it is, and now I return c,
00:24:31
turning it inside out with this plane
00:24:34
welle back and so f after him with aj
00:24:40
after him sl2 turning inside out
00:24:48
returns point b to point b because
00:24:51
that’s all I drove it to cs easier, turn it inside out and
00:24:54
return it back to b
00:24:55
but these two turnings after f.
00:25:01
but they didn’t change it because
00:25:05
they didn’t change this according to our construction, but this
00:25:08
passed through and the
00:25:10
eversion plane passes through this one here
00:25:12
.
00:25:13
therefore, she also did not change it is very
00:25:15
difficult to imagine, but this is
00:25:17
geometric intuition, space
00:25:19
that is absolutely necessary for life for everyone
00:25:22
who lives in this world, take swords,
00:25:25
draw on it, you see what is
00:25:26
happening, but then from these two
00:25:29
statements it
00:25:30
follows that s el is made after
00:25:33
hh and in the light zaev is equal to
00:25:36
identical, the transformation does not
00:25:38
change anything because these points were chosen
00:25:40
not opposite to each other, they
00:25:42
turned their state around, which means that here
00:25:46
we can again, as if multiplying, yes, I will
00:25:49
give a knife, I’m on the left, it follows that f
00:25:53
is sh on I’m just a goal, that is, if
00:25:57
we click on dreams, he will die with el
00:25:59
because double turning means they
00:26:01
did nothing and then again on sh and
00:26:04
he will die and sage and here, accordingly,
00:26:06
a goal will arise and then massage, that is, the
00:26:10
only transformation that is
00:26:11
back to f Well, it’s like she’s the only one,
00:26:15
but this one, but the opposite of this, in fact, this is the
00:26:20
turning inside out again turning
00:26:21
back turning inside out will
00:26:24
do nothing therefore iv this is a double
00:26:26
turning
00:26:27
and now I’m claiming that a double
00:26:29
turning is always a turning and that
00:26:32
in fact it was wrong that
00:26:33
there is no such point, but because
00:26:35
he has two more double inversions, I
00:26:37
have inverted planes relative to me
00:26:39
and some other but some other one
00:26:47
necessarily intersects with this one because there
00:26:54
are no parallel lines on a sphere, a straight
00:27:00
line on a sphere is only an arc of a large
00:27:03
circle, no other of a small circle
00:27:05
is not a mother not to shout distance
00:27:06
that is, these here eversion
00:27:08
occurs only in relation to large
00:27:10
circles, otherwise you, as if for us,
00:27:12
move the entire sphere somewhere and not as a single whole,
00:27:14
which is forbidden, but any two arcs of a great
00:27:19
circle are natural, like any two
00:27:20
planes in space up to containing
00:27:22
intersect in a straight line means these
00:27:23
intersect along this axis and that means
00:27:25
these two points actually
00:27:27
exist, they are motionless because
00:27:31
with one
00:27:32
inversion and with the other both points
00:27:34
remained in place, that is, in
00:27:37
fact, no such a case is impossible and any
00:27:40
transformation of the sphere this is a turn
00:27:42
because if the point is stationary and exists
00:27:44
then this is a turn it can be proven
00:27:46
this theorem was proven in the evening in 1700
00:27:49
shaggy year
00:27:50
I don’t remember which one but about whom he was on tour
00:27:54
and before that we need to talk separately this is a
00:27:55
very serious big topic well you can
00:27:58
as a thread and here Let's talk about them in another video,
00:28:00
thanks for your attention

Description:

Российская платформа математических вычислений и динамического моделирования Engee: сайт: https://start.engee.com/ Телеграм канал: https://t.me/engee_com ############### Теорема вращения Эйлера. Что такое движение. Вращение сферы. "Если движение f оставляет на месте две непротивоположные точки a и b, то f тождественно равно id". Мы в соцсетях: VK ‣ https://vk.com/mathworks​ Telegram ‣ https://t.me/exponenta_ru

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "13. Вращение сферы" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "13. Вращение сферы" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "13. Вращение сферы" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "13. Вращение сферы" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "13. Вращение сферы"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "13. Вращение сферы"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.