background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С."

input logo icon
Video tags
|

Video tags

ВЕИП
Психоанализ
Образование
Психология
Лекция
Вебинар
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:02
so colleagues Good afternoon evening
00:00:08
I can hear I
00:00:09
apologize, apparently some kind of
00:00:12
internal overlay occurred over time
00:00:14
I was sure that
00:00:16
we still had time, it turns out No,
00:00:20
well, I’m glad to welcome you
00:00:23
to our webinar dedicated to the course on the
00:00:27
history of psychoanalysis in the USA and
00:00:29
Great Britain, apparently Can you hear me,
00:00:32
everything is fine
00:00:34
and so
00:00:36
today of our meeting I offered
00:00:39
you an article
00:00:41
by Thomas, which in turn is
00:00:44
devoted to the analysis of the
00:00:48
nature and function of fantasy, you probably
00:00:51
If you have already mastered the course theoretically,
00:00:55
then you have already seen the mention of this article, you
00:01:00
have come across this is exactly the article in
00:01:03
connection with
00:01:05
publications which, first with
00:01:07
the speech, connected with her ksuzny
00:01:09
report at the psychoanalytic congress,
00:01:12
further In connection with the publication of this article, the
00:01:18
final split in the
00:01:20
British psychoanalytic society occurs,
00:01:23
which continues to
00:01:26
exist today, after which
00:01:28
we have three groups
00:01:30
in the British psychoanalytic society, a
00:01:33
group of followers of soap, not
00:01:35
Kleinians, the so-called group of
00:01:37
followers of Anna Freud and
00:01:40
Freud himself, and the so-called third group of
00:01:43
independent ones. That is, those who do not belong to one of the
00:01:46
others
00:01:48
articulate and support such their autonomy,
00:01:52
so we
00:01:54
may have a webinar there in connection with the fact that,
00:01:58
as far as I understand you, there is still 1
00:02:00
year of study, some questions may be related
00:02:03
to this, but nevertheless, the webinar
00:02:06
provides an opportunity for us
00:02:09
to talk to clarify what remains for you, it
00:02:13
may not be completely clear
00:02:16
what caused some of your questions there
00:02:18
may be some special interest in
00:02:21
something, yes, that is, we
00:02:23
have the opportunity to hold
00:02:26
this meeting in such a dialogical manner.
00:02:29
And unfortunately, for some reason your questions did
00:02:34
not appear; maybe, of course,
00:02:36
everything is so clear, the course
00:02:40
is transparent,
00:02:42
everything is so for you clear, yes, but nevertheless,
00:02:46
I would still like it. Perhaps
00:02:49
then now in such a live mode,
00:02:52
some questions We
00:02:54
formulated and discussed Yes, because
00:02:58
I repeat this again and again Yes, I tell
00:03:01
students about this From year to year, no matter how it
00:03:04
is we have to talk with
00:03:08
those people who contact us. And no
00:03:10
matter how much we might want to
00:03:12
avoid this, for various reasons we
00:03:16
have to do it. Therefore, in the
00:03:18
learning process, I would like you to
00:03:21
start talking, start talking
00:03:25
first of all about what you may have
00:03:28
left
00:03:30
not enough Clear enough
00:03:32
That is, you and I have two
00:03:34
such blocks, the first block is the
00:03:38
course itself and perhaps some questions about it,
00:03:41
and the second block if you have time before the article is
00:03:43
quite voluminous. Maybe it is
00:03:46
quite complicated for those who are
00:03:49
just starting to enter the psychoanalytic
00:03:52
field this is in psychoanalytic language in
00:03:56
psychological conceptual apparatus,
00:03:57
respectively, you and I have full
00:04:00
scope for action, we can
00:04:03
go and other various questions then we
00:04:06
may discuss some that It would
00:04:08
seem that they do not have such a completely direct
00:04:10
relation to the course, but they may
00:04:14
bother you, you could have them, so
00:04:17
please
00:04:19
Let's formulate the questions
00:04:23
What will we talk about?
00:04:26
I have Hello colleagues,
00:04:31
the most primitive question in fact. It
00:04:34
turns out that there is a split into 3 communities.
00:04:38
I'm interested in what is the difference, how they were so
00:04:41
fundamentally different, on the basis of
00:04:43
what they split, where you didn't become friends, did
00:04:47
you read the course materials, generally
00:04:50
speaking, yes it is stated there that we
00:04:54
are talking historically about two stages of
00:04:57
discussion of contradictions so-called in
00:05:00
Russian-language literature You are exactly such a
00:05:03
term 3 discussion of contradictions first
00:05:06
unfolds in our country on
00:05:08
26,900 on 26,
00:05:11
1927 and they are associated with disagreements
00:05:15
between Malaya and Anna Freud regarding
00:05:18
child psychoanalysis. What if you are a
00:05:21
collection Please look, that is,
00:05:24
as far as I understand the text materials,
00:05:26
you have the text of the lecture, then there are
00:05:29
respectively 4
00:05:31
points in which they disagreed with each other,
00:05:35
which they tried to discuss and
00:05:38
come to some kind of compromise, voiced,
00:05:42
they relate to working with children, maybe
00:05:45
then now with Let's try to remember
00:05:47
which four we are talking about. Since
00:05:50
after this polemic between Anna Freud and
00:05:55
little Klein, a split does not occur, but
00:05:57
nevertheless, members of the British
00:05:59
psychoanalytic society begin
00:06:01
to ask these questions, that is, also
00:06:03
whose positions and views are closer to the views of
00:06:07
Anna Freud, which in turn are
00:06:09
follows Freud and places drives or closer views in the first place in the
00:06:12
center of mental functioning,
00:06:19
which already at that time begins to talk
00:06:23
about unconscious fantasies and what is similar
00:06:27
from her point of view. They are at the
00:06:33
core of how the psyche functions and,
00:06:37
in fact, this is exactly in what form
00:06:39
attraction is presented in our
00:06:41
psyche a little later in 1943, the
00:06:45
second unfolds with discussions about
00:06:48
contradictions and are connected. They are just us with
00:06:51
Seuss’s speech in the language in
00:06:54
which she
00:06:57
was published as an oral report, this article was
00:07:00
later presented
00:07:02
her view client view she is a
00:07:05
sequence student a little not
00:07:07
Klein actually asked to speak
00:07:10
because she herself had
00:07:14
addressed quite a few
00:07:18
works, especially conceptual works.
00:07:21
Therefore, she asked Susie to put into language
00:07:23
ideas regarding the
00:07:25
unconscious fantasy of its role in the
00:07:28
mental apparatus in mental
00:07:30
functioning. Actually, just in
00:07:32
this article, the nature and function of fantasy and
00:07:35
in the discussion of this article as once again,
00:07:38
seemingly
00:07:40
insurmountable contradictions in views begin to emerge
00:07:43
between the followers of Anna Freddy, rather
00:07:46
the same follower of Sigmund
00:07:49
Freud, and the views and positions of Mel don’t curse
00:07:53
who took the middle position entered the
00:07:57
group of independent so-called
00:07:59
quite heterogeneous audience there are
00:08:03
students among them
00:08:07
entered this group Although he studied
00:08:10
They defend some of their
00:08:14
views, their positions of a
00:08:17
different nature. As you remember from the text of the
00:08:21
lecture, what are the grounds, what are the disagreements, the
00:08:25
discussion, the contradictions, what are Mel
00:08:28
and Anna Freud disagreeing with each other
00:08:31
regarding child
00:08:32
psychoanalysis,
00:08:41
here was this series of positions, only
00:08:44
I have why something 5 is formulated if I
00:08:46
think about that questions Well, there is a
00:08:50
Preparatory phase first about
00:08:53
this about this is about that right
00:08:55
Well, yes, she read that this is the goal of a
00:09:00
psychoanalyst to interest Well, since
00:09:03
the child does not turn to a
00:09:04
psychoanalyst for consultations, but is
00:09:07
brought by his parents then Accordingly, the
00:09:10
psychoanalyst needs to interest the child in
00:09:12
the process of psychoanalysis; for this, a
00:09:15
preparatory phase is required;
00:09:17
not the client believed that, in general, the
00:09:21
child does not need to be specially
00:09:22
interested in any way, or specially
00:09:24
prepared, because literally
00:09:26
after the first conversation there, some first
00:09:29
interpretation given to the child He himself
00:09:32
will have an interest in this process
00:09:35
later
00:09:37
[music]
00:09:38
ah-ah regarding transference, the
00:09:42
presence of transference in children Anna Frey
00:09:45
read that transference is impossible in children
00:09:48
since
00:09:49
there are parental figures and, as it were, for a
00:09:52
psychoanalyst this transference Well, it will not be
00:09:55
relevant
00:09:57
only if to somehow isolate the child in
00:10:00
some kind of boarding school or there
00:10:02
I understood, but then she even founded this
00:10:06
hospital or that it was a boarding school for
00:10:08
children where they were kept there and
00:10:10
underwent psychoanalysis, but the
00:10:13
client did
00:10:15
n’t agree with her about this and it was believed that
00:10:17
transference can be formed by the
00:10:19
analyst and, in general, there are no
00:10:22
problems with this. No, and about the game
00:10:28
that the child’s parents themselves
00:10:33
are also figures or objects of transference,
00:10:37
such an important idea that the analyst, in
00:10:42
turn, is therefore as if she were talking
00:10:45
about the fact that there is a certain transference on the parents and
00:10:49
then there is a certain transference on the analyst, so there is
00:10:51
no contradiction in this. Well, that
00:10:54
even the relationship with the parents improves.
00:10:57
When in the bridge of the nose the analyst
00:10:59
resolves these situations and then the family,
00:11:03
as it were, well,
00:11:06
interaction with the parents
00:11:10
and then regarding the game, that Freud
00:11:14
criticized the importance of the game in
00:11:18
psychoanalysis
00:11:20
and no matter how she believed that the game
00:11:25
cannot be an analogue of free associations
00:11:27
in adults and therefore is not part of
00:11:29
psychoanalysis. Just a little, the client believed
00:11:31
that there is always a connection between the
00:11:33
figure in the game and the
00:11:37
objects in life child significant, that
00:11:40
is, parents
00:11:42
It seems that the main oppositions in which
00:11:47
they do not agree with each other, that is, those
00:11:49
related then to the idea of
00:11:52
mental life about how it works,
00:11:55
how it is organized and techniques for working with
00:12:00
children,
00:12:05
this point about the game lets out the oil of such
00:12:07
generalized 3 and will remain so
00:12:12
Klein has developed a strict play
00:12:13
technique for working with
00:12:17
small children, and today
00:12:19
it continues to
00:12:22
exist because for small
00:12:26
children this is something that few
00:12:27
encountered before the pre-teen
00:12:30
age of 10-11 years are not able to freely
00:12:34
associate they cannot perform this
00:12:38
technical the requirement is
00:12:39
psychoanalytic, therefore, since she
00:12:42
herself worked in many ways with
00:12:45
small children, starting from the age of two or three,
00:12:47
it became necessary to create
00:12:50
some kind of alternative and she suggested that you and
00:12:54
I play with the children. Those who have
00:12:58
children, those who observe children around us,
00:13:02
understand that at two three years is
00:13:04
really many years. At seven years old,
00:13:06
a child cannot indulge in free
00:13:09
associations lying on the couch while the
00:13:11
analyst behind him is
00:13:14
mostly silent and interprets
00:13:17
what he is talking about from manifest explicit
00:13:20
revealed contents moving on to latent
00:13:23
hidden contents, it is simply impossible
00:13:25
for such a small child more Moreover,
00:13:29
with regard to children of such an
00:13:32
intermediate age from 10 11 to
00:13:36
adolescence, pre-adolescence, beginning
00:13:38
of adolescence, also specialists who
00:13:41
work with children and adolescents usually
00:13:44
offer the child to choose what
00:13:48
he wants. He wants to talk or he
00:13:51
wants to play, and at any moment he can
00:13:53
turn to the game material toys
00:13:57
that are present in the office in order to
00:13:59
express something, even if at first he
00:14:01
said that he would like to
00:14:03
talk to no one, even when working with
00:14:06
teenagers, it happens that sometimes you
00:14:09
may want to turn to some
00:14:12
kind of game object
00:14:15
the format of the work, especially when
00:14:20
some difficult topics arise
00:14:23
for direct discussion to talk about
00:14:26
them, so usually the office of a
00:14:29
specialist who works with children from
00:14:31
teenagers
00:14:33
looks like this today there are
00:14:36
toys and, accordingly, it is
00:14:39
possible to draw
00:14:42
pictures as one of the options
00:14:45
therapy with non-adult adults, we are
00:14:50
still talking about the end of
00:14:51
adolescence from about 18 years of age and
00:14:56
the ability to talk
00:14:58
is present, because indeed in
00:15:01
this regard
00:15:03
young children are absolutely right;
00:15:07
they cannot freely associate the date, which
00:15:09
Anna Freud tells us then applies
00:15:11
only to older children This
00:15:14
means that it deprives us of the opportunity for
00:15:15
psychoanalytic work with children;
00:15:18
there is another option when this
00:15:21
happens in the presence of a parent
00:15:24
accompanied by the mother. But still, usually we
00:15:28
choose this gaming technique and
00:15:31
work with parents separately. That is,
00:15:33
firstly, if you and I remember an even
00:15:36
more recent
00:15:38
specialist in areas of work with children
00:15:43
said that 99 percent of cases of
00:15:47
children’s problems are problems of parents,
00:15:50
therefore, therapy is usually needed by
00:15:55
parents and not by the child, and then when
00:15:57
parents work through some of their
00:16:00
difficulties, some of their problems are
00:16:02
resolved, the condition
00:16:05
for the child improves by itself,
00:16:07
for example, systemic family therapy date the
00:16:10
idea is fully used when a
00:16:13
child is spoken of as a carrier of a
00:16:15
family symptom since he
00:16:18
is in the most dependent on the most
00:16:21
vulnerable position, his psyche is the least
00:16:25
mature compared to adult
00:16:28
family members, respectively, often through
00:16:30
some of his own problems through some of his
00:16:33
own symptoms The child tells us the
00:16:35
family history and what the problem or
00:16:39
problems of the adults in this family are.
00:16:42
Therefore, accordingly, if we are
00:16:44
approached with a child. We
00:16:47
consult the first meetings, we communicate
00:16:50
with the parents and communicate with the child and
00:16:54
make a decision who
00:16:56
really needs therapy, often
00:16:58
we offer therapy for adult family members,
00:17:02
parents, for example, individual
00:17:04
therapy or some kind of parallel
00:17:07
work. Let’s say we take the child’s work.
00:17:10
But then, according to the
00:17:11
parents or one of the
00:17:14
parents, but more often. It happens that mothers are
00:17:18
more willing to go to their own
00:17:21
therapy. Why do dads express discoveries for many reasons?
00:17:25
then we
00:17:28
recommend that one of
00:17:31
our colleagues contact them, we give some recommendations,
00:17:33
or vice versa, we can work with someone adult
00:17:37
if there is a need for
00:17:39
child therapy, such a desire,
00:17:41
accordingly, we recommend a specialist
00:17:43
who works with children or
00:17:45
adolescents, another
00:17:48
additional difficulty arises
00:17:52
modern psychoanalytic therapy
00:17:54
adheres to the position that here it is
00:17:57
exactly close to what Anna
00:18:00
Freud proposed, that before work is
00:18:02
possible, we need to
00:18:04
formulate the own
00:18:07
request of this now teenager, no longer
00:18:11
a child. Why does he
00:18:17
need therapy with us? Our work could be needed. be What is useful
00:18:20
because otherwise a fairly
00:18:23
common situation on the one
00:18:26
hand, a teenager even before us has a
00:18:28
dependent person in bondage if his parents
00:18:32
brought him in and decided that he needs therapy,
00:18:35
of course he
00:18:38
can begin to fulfill this requirement for some time, but if
00:18:40
we agreed with him, they did not clarify
00:18:43
they didn’t understand, and for what purpose it
00:18:46
could actually be necessary and useful, most likely
00:18:49
we will be dealing with such a
00:18:51
history of
00:18:52
receiving
00:18:54
psychological
00:18:56
psychodiagnostic practice, this
00:18:57
is called socially desirable answers, a
00:19:03
young man or girl will come to us in 45 or minutes
00:19:07
and we will be more
00:19:10
perceived as some agents of
00:19:13
parents, accordingly, to be
00:19:17
openly honest with us, to talk about what
00:19:20
really bothers him, the head will
00:19:22
come will be very problematic. That
00:19:25
is, this is the difficulty that
00:19:30
workers of various
00:19:33
educational institutions and school
00:19:36
psychologists face in full, generally speaking, it is very
00:19:39
doubtful that a
00:19:41
teenager who already understands quite a lot will
00:19:44
come and he will talk openly with the school psychologist about
00:19:47
anything,
00:19:50
being completely unsure
00:19:54
that he will be
00:19:56
guaranteed compliance with children and
00:20:00
adolescents as well as with adults, we
00:20:02
comply with the rules of confidentiality,
00:20:04
what will happen with what he
00:20:06
will talk about will become Is
00:20:08
anyone aware of this, from teachers to
00:20:11
parents to classmates?
00:20:14
Big questions are in great
00:20:17
doubt. Therefore,
00:20:18
our task with you is to carry out this
00:20:20
preliminary work with the teenager to
00:20:22
find out what he wants, what he
00:20:27
could get, what excites and
00:20:30
worries him speaking directly about the fact that yes, we
00:20:33
found out, we heard something, mom is worried and
00:20:36
worried And you,
00:20:38
even on you, we can communicate
00:20:43
from you, why might you want to
00:20:46
work, if we can’t formulate this request, then on
00:20:49
and on More likely, it
00:20:53
will be some kind of both sides, imitation of
00:20:56
psychological
00:20:58
work, especially psychoanalytic work. Therefore, if
00:21:00
we hear from a teenager a categorical
00:21:03
refusal Yes, the words that I need, I do
00:21:08
n’t want anything, accordingly, then we
00:21:11
talk with the parents, we talk about the fact that
00:21:14
Perhaps then psychotherapy is what
00:21:16
he really wants and we could do it
00:21:20
propose And since the child is not ready,
00:21:23
he does not want, we are here in the position of such
00:21:27
Truth of frankness, we do not
00:21:30
insist, because as I have already
00:21:33
said, Otherwise, it will be some kind of
00:21:36
imitation, he will come to imitate an
00:21:39
interested patient, we will
00:21:41
sit to imitate a
00:21:44
child adolescent psychoanalyst, that
00:21:47
is, then
00:21:48
we refuse, they say that we have a conversation with the parents,
00:21:52
saying that, unfortunately,
00:21:54
only your desire is not enough,
00:21:56
since the child does not have his own
00:22:00
desire, the work
00:22:02
becomes impossible, but if you want, then
00:22:05
maybe then we could work with you
00:22:08
just because you
00:22:10
worries because very often we
00:22:13
hear that
00:22:14
parents are worried about
00:22:17
that very teenage crisis, that very
00:22:20
teenage rebellion that begins
00:22:22
to unfold when something completely different grows out of such an
00:22:25
obedient cute
00:22:28
student at school, a cute
00:22:30
latent kid,
00:22:32
something completely different is very
00:22:37
disturbing for so many internal
00:22:40
reasons, we can certainly meet
00:22:44
That is why, in fact, there are
00:22:48
not so many specialists working with teenage children, we can
00:22:51
meet with a categorical reaction from a
00:22:53
parent to this, saying that no,
00:22:57
I don’t need this, but the child needs it, I
00:22:59
already explained everything to you there or I explained it,
00:23:01
I said it’s a big regret that
00:23:05
it works forced and then such
00:23:09
To refuse work, I suggest that the parent
00:23:11
just think about it.
00:23:14
You’re probably thinking. Come here. Let’s
00:23:16
work on what’s bothering you.
00:23:18
About your child or in relation to
00:23:21
your child, what is it? Yes, such
00:23:25
experience
00:23:26
tells us that it looks like Françoise
00:23:29
Daltovogo was quite right,
00:23:31
again like psychoanalysts Yes we know
00:23:34
that we all come from childhood,
00:23:36
respectively, those teenage children who have a
00:23:40
prosperous family situation, parents
00:23:43
who do not need their own psychotherapy,
00:23:46
they come to us,
00:23:47
Parents who, for example, with this
00:23:50
teenage crisis with this
00:23:51
teenage rebellion, turn out to be able to
00:23:56
somehow cope with getting in this with this
00:23:59
or then it’s Parents who come
00:24:02
themselves, not the child, then the
00:24:04
mother comes and says that you know, this is
00:24:07
one of the reasons for contacting you, I have a
00:24:09
14-year-old son or daughter, what’s happening
00:24:13
I really want to work on this
00:24:16
then that’s why on the one hand, in connection with
00:24:20
this, you and I can completely come to the
00:24:22
conclusion that in some ways, if it
00:24:25
concerns young children, we are more similar to a
00:24:29
greater extent, a little not Klein, in some ways,
00:24:31
if this concerns teenagers and
00:24:34
older children,
00:24:36
Anna Freud from a technical point of view, but
00:24:41
nevertheless, you and I can, since
00:24:43
clinicians will be critical,
00:24:45
use
00:24:48
gaming equipment somewhere, conversational
00:24:51
equipment somewhere, and it is clear that when a
00:24:52
child and I play with him and talk
00:24:54
in the same language, this does not mean that it goes away in
00:24:57
complete silence, a certain rearrangement of
00:25:00
toys in some space. But with
00:25:03
regard to transfer, what Klein tells us
00:25:06
little about probably has a large basis
00:25:12
today, from the position of modern
00:25:14
analysts,
00:25:17
when she essentially tells us for the first time
00:25:21
about what seems to
00:25:23
exist and already at a very early age,
00:25:27
certain internal objects of the individual
00:25:33
which, in turn, are
00:25:36
projected onto external objects and then
00:25:39
how these projections are dealt with. Well, or
00:25:42
by transfer this external object
00:25:45
again becomes internal, we change, it
00:25:49
modifies the internal object again, it
00:25:51
unfolds again, this is
00:25:54
externalization and a new internalization
00:25:57
occurs
00:25:59
little does not Klein introduces for us
00:26:01
the idea of ​​these cycles,
00:26:04
essentially resolving a dilemma that
00:26:08
has existed for a long time in psychological science,
00:26:11
including psychoanalytic science,
00:26:14
what is more important is what happens internally
00:26:20
determines external attraction determines
00:26:24
what happens in me this is
00:26:26
Freud’s thesis from the work of the
00:26:29
theory of sexuality in 1905 Freud
00:26:34
says attraction is primary and the object
00:26:37
secondary first of the drive that is looking
00:26:41
for an object to which
00:26:44
the supporters of the theory of object relations will be directed is
00:26:48
such a very important school for today's fault
00:26:51
code for example that is why he ended up
00:26:53
among the group of independents they say
00:26:55
that nothing like that is most important the object is
00:27:00
what is happening in me how my mother
00:27:03
fulfills her role as she copes
00:27:06
with her functions. This will
00:27:08
determine what will happen
00:27:09
inside it. It seems that if we return
00:27:15
there we will be able to discover that
00:27:18
both are important. It would seem so trivial and
00:27:21
obvious to us today,
00:27:23
however, there are many discussions that are
00:27:27
also
00:27:29
ongoing today, she tells us about the fact that
00:27:31
there is
00:27:32
something internal, initial, primary, which,
00:27:36
being externalized externally, influences this
00:27:40
object, the object gives some kind of reaction,
00:27:44
which in turn becomes
00:27:46
placed inside and modifies this
00:27:50
internal object or does not modify it,
00:27:52
respectively, this is what determines the
00:27:56
transition from paranoia In the
00:27:58
schizoid position to depressive or it does
00:28:01
n’t happen, and moreover, she
00:28:04
tells us that both of these positions will
00:28:07
exist in our psyche
00:28:10
throughout the rest of our lives,
00:28:12
she
00:28:15
does not deny Afridov’s stability. She says that she is
00:28:18
interested in a much earlier stage from
00:28:20
birth approximately
00:28:22
the age of three or four and then about
00:28:26
a year,
00:28:27
what happens at the Freudian
00:28:30
oral stage,
00:28:32
reinforcing the fact that these phases will continue to be
00:28:38
present throughout later life And we all
00:28:41
exist at both levels and the
00:28:45
level of our mental
00:28:47
functioning is further neurotic,
00:28:49
borderline or psychotic will be
00:28:51
determined by the specific weight of
00:28:54
which of these phases is greater, that is, conditionally
00:28:57
greater, and more often we in a depressive
00:29:00
position
00:29:01
exist in a depressive opposition,
00:29:03
then the neurotic organization, if
00:29:06
more and more often on Paranoia, then the
00:29:09
Borderline Organization or the
00:29:11
psychotic organization we will have,
00:29:14
respectively,
00:29:16
similar to today’s such
00:29:19
fundamental contradictions no, for
00:29:23
some situations, one is more likely to be suitable for
00:29:28
others, and
00:29:31
the other is more likely to be suitable, but still in relation to the
00:29:33
conceptual transfer of us by the game. It seems
00:29:37
that little and no damn reflects to a greater extent
00:29:41
what is really
00:29:43
unfolding, unlike Anna Freud,
00:29:46
who would like perhaps
00:29:50
more of such a psychological the logic of
00:29:53
the work of
00:29:54
the media To continue to be 43 years old
00:29:59
Susan Isaacs and with an article by nature with a
00:30:03
speech with an article with a report by
00:30:05
nature and the function of fantasy where she already
00:30:08
dates the idea of ​​unconscious fantasies
00:30:10
that are further transformed More
00:30:13
Jews internal objects or
00:30:15
presentations of oneself effects between
00:30:19
them
00:30:20
develops joins in fact For the first time
00:30:23
this is consistently
00:30:26
logically argued and begins to sound
00:30:30
accordingly here already in relation to
00:30:33
what is at the
00:30:36
center of mental life, already an analyst in
00:30:41
British English has to
00:30:43
choose concept ideas for them.
00:30:52
I therefore may not have had time to
00:30:56
read this article, which is voluminous as I already
00:31:00
said, so I offered it to you, yes, that
00:31:02
is Tom Sogdan One of the most
00:31:05
interesting leading modern
00:31:07
psychoanalysts, moreover, working
00:31:10
as the head of an organization that
00:31:13
deals with the
00:31:15
psychoanalytic treatment of psychoses and
00:31:18
severe non-neurotic pathologies, he
00:31:21
actually reads this article, the nature and function of
00:31:23
fantasy, sequentially,
00:31:28
explains to us, makes it, if we are not
00:31:32
Klinians, there is a lot of pain, so understandable and
00:31:36
comes in them, with a very important conclusion at
00:31:40
the end, they say that the school of
00:31:43
object relations is largely connected
00:31:47
with clayey’s development,
00:31:51
articulating these differences between the ideas of
00:31:54
Asics and, accordingly, there is little
00:31:56
swearing in many ways and Ronald Farmer and his
00:32:01
concepts that are in the theory of object
00:32:03
relations B further developed, so I
00:32:06
highly recommend that everyone expects
00:32:10
to try the article further later if you haven’t had time
00:32:12
to read it yet and maybe
00:32:15
capture some basic thoughts for yourself
00:32:21
whether someone has already approached it or have
00:32:29
n’t read the article yet. Can I have a question about
00:32:33
when I started reading I just arose
00:32:36
There, well, there’s just a misunderstanding there and
00:32:38
everywhere about instinct. And before that we were
00:32:41
attracting and now I have some kind of
00:32:43
bridge, I’m reading and so I don’t understand what we’re talking about
00:32:46
and here we are such a
00:32:48
split. [ __ ], I couldn’t somehow
00:32:51
Well, understand, understand, not because if
00:32:53
I switch to what this attraction is, I replace
00:32:56
something, but somehow
00:32:58
the picture didn’t work out, it was difficult to
00:33:00
combine this matter in translation
00:33:03
or just about a different
00:33:07
matter. Thank you very much for the question, the question is
00:33:10
very important since you and I as
00:33:13
those who read mainly the Russian translation
00:33:16
into Russian, we can and do encounter precisely this
00:33:18
complexity, the
00:33:21
matter is in historicism and in how it is
00:33:25
consistently accepted to translate the
00:33:28
Lidovian and German term I can
00:33:33
Probably if someone speaks German in German,
00:33:35
how will this be correct in the transcription
00:33:37
Freud uses a word that
00:33:40
can be translated both as an attraction and as an
00:33:43
instinct, and the fact is that the first
00:33:46
translations of Freud from German into
00:33:48
English belong to Stritch,
00:33:51
who translated the word
00:33:54
used by Freud as an instinct into English That is why
00:33:58
If you and I Maybe someone has met
00:34:00
and encountered, we will open the
00:34:04
translations some Freudian works
00:34:08
from about the 90s into Russian, then
00:34:12
there and everywhere we will see the word
00:34:14
instinct for the word drive, we
00:34:16
will not see there because these are translations from
00:34:18
English, that is, meetings into
00:34:21
English translated as instinct, everything that is
00:34:24
translated from English into Russian,
00:34:26
respectively is also translated as
00:34:28
instinct of some kind the question
00:34:30
is clarified and the windows are
00:34:33
indeed in accordance with the
00:34:37
Anglo-Saxon tradition of British and
00:34:40
American modern psychoanalysis
00:34:42
also use after the meeting the word
00:34:45
instinct meaning that's when you were
00:34:48
forced to do this double
00:34:49
translation Using
00:34:52
this word as a translation
00:34:56
of Freudian
00:34:57
he uses, respectively, we are
00:35:01
studying and more
00:35:04
recent translations of Freud, when they began
00:35:06
to translate into Russian from German, they
00:35:09
just offer us the word drive,
00:35:11
so in
00:35:14
old translations from English or
00:35:17
current some articles or
00:35:19
monographs of
00:35:20
English-speaking analysts, you and I will often
00:35:24
see the word instinct for ourselves then
00:35:28
we are replacing with the word attraction, that
00:35:32
is, in this case, the point is not that the
00:35:34
male is not
00:35:36
sufficiently informed in the
00:35:39
psychoanalytic theory before which
00:35:40
Ogndon translated this article, but the point is
00:35:43
that windows, in accordance with the tradition of
00:35:45
English and American psychoanalysis,
00:35:48
use exactly this word, therefore in
00:35:51
this sense the translation reliable She
00:35:53
can mislead you and me like this,
00:35:56
that is, we then,
00:35:58
accordingly, where we see instinct,
00:36:01
it means some
00:36:04
stable behavioral pattern related to the animal world that
00:36:11
realizes itself outside of
00:36:13
conscious control, respectively,
00:36:16
we replace it with the word attraction
00:36:19
will become clearer, therefore here
00:36:22
can be defined by tradition we meet
00:36:25
which begins with a meeting and his
00:36:29
translations of Freud into English, the first
00:36:33
number of English analysts and American
00:36:37
analysts continue to use exactly this
00:36:39
word, that is, everyone there
00:36:41
understands what is meant. Yes, it’s
00:36:44
great that we felt it, we
00:36:46
saw it from the text and for ourselves we
00:36:49
began to do this work for for you and me who
00:36:52
are studying today, who are already reading
00:36:55
today's translations of Freud from
00:36:58
German, the word attraction is suitable so that We
00:37:02
understand what we are talking about, it is wonderful
00:37:05
such attentiveness of your text,
00:37:09
again, I will make a reservation, it may be as
00:37:11
such general
00:37:14
general recommendations for such training. The fact is
00:37:18
that
00:37:19
our attention, our thinking with memory
00:37:23
as a consequence of attention and thinking is structured in this
00:37:27
way, I realized that if we
00:37:29
come across any
00:37:32
familiar word in any
00:37:35
artistic or some kind of scientific text, if
00:37:38
we don’t know the meaning of this word or
00:37:42
find it difficult to define it, it seems to be
00:37:46
something familiar but not so that
00:37:50
we could say to ourselves especially clearly, but what does
00:37:53
this actually mean? Next,
00:37:56
if we skip this word, deciding that it does
00:37:59
n’t have much meaning, then we
00:38:03
no longer perceive the text, that is, the meanings
00:38:06
begin to elude us or we begin to
00:38:09
replace the missing meanings with something something we
00:38:12
already know Who just what you voiced
00:38:15
and it’s wonderful that you stopped at
00:38:18
this word got hooked on it if you don’t
00:38:22
understand what is meant And the word is often
00:38:25
found then the
00:38:27
meaning of what is written about what is written
00:38:30
does not become clear
00:38:34
nothing is clear in this case on
00:38:37
Therefore, with regard to
00:38:38
psychoanalytic texts, just as I
00:38:41
understand that you have very large volumes of
00:38:45
information, a huge amount of
00:38:47
literature, all political, you are
00:38:50
asked to read, master
00:38:53
such a fairly short period of time, nevertheless, still
00:38:58
try to
00:38:59
treat the study of a
00:39:02
psychoneutic language as the study of a
00:39:04
foreign language if we - we
00:39:07
meet an unfamiliar word We turn to
00:39:12
What do we do if we start learning
00:39:17
Hindi
00:39:18
five words in a sentence are clear 5
00:39:23
unknown sentences of 10 words what
00:39:25
then do we
00:39:31
look at the dictionary great we
00:39:34
Turn to dictionaries therefore I recommend to
00:39:38
you two such well-
00:39:40
known psychoanalytic dictionaries 1
00:39:44
hour
00:39:46
critical dictionary of psychoanalysis second
00:39:50
no less famous may be even the more
00:39:52
famous dictionary of psychoanalysis by Laplanche
00:39:56
and Pantolis and the third less known topic.
00:40:02
However, especially if we are talking about
00:40:05
different Klinin texts, as in this
00:40:08
case, I highly recommend it to you, in
00:40:11
comparison with the first two dictionaries,
00:40:14
this book was translated into Russian not so long ago and
00:40:17
is called it dictionary of
00:40:20
psychoanalysis author of her hin Shell Wood
00:40:24
Robert Hinshawd
00:40:27
looks extremely useful And
00:40:31
[music]
00:40:32
informative for us consists of two sections;
00:40:36
one section
00:40:38
also gives definitions and colleagues in a historical
00:40:41
context, how ideas
00:40:45
about a particular concept have changed in different schools of
00:40:49
psychoanalysis in including any
00:40:52
concept, let’s say we came across the word
00:40:54
instinct, you can just reduce the
00:40:59
meaning of this word and there is not
00:41:01
just a definition Yes, but there instinct
00:41:04
is just that, but in historical logic
00:41:08
who said what about this, you
00:41:11
can find out, for example, that in the
00:41:14
Anglo-Saxon
00:41:16
school schools of Anglo-Saxon it is accepted to
00:41:19
use the word instinct to use others
00:41:21
to accept words in treatment to use the
00:41:23
second section consists of personal
00:41:28
different That is, you can read the concepts of different
00:41:30
psychological authors there with
00:41:34
references to works to years of
00:41:37
activity, this is also in such a historical
00:41:40
key and the key of continuity who and how
00:41:42
who influenced whom and something he suggested,
00:41:45
what he said on what occasion, therefore
00:41:48
I believe that one of, if not the most,
00:41:52
is better today in this
00:41:55
dictionary version, then we would rather
00:41:57
say that this is such an
00:41:59
explanatory dictionary of psychoanalytic
00:42:03
language, so it might make sense
00:42:06
to spend
00:42:08
additional time on that that then it
00:42:11
will work for you, clarifying some
00:42:14
meanings of some words now, but then
00:42:17
you will read new texts, you
00:42:20
will not have any questions or difficulties.
00:42:23
Thank you very much for the questions and for such
00:42:27
attention to the texts, since one of the
00:42:32
tasks of our professional training
00:42:34
is learn to read professional literature on your own
00:42:38
because
00:42:42
a lot of time has passed since the time of Freud
00:42:45
and modern psychoanalysis is
00:42:49
very rich in various interesting
00:42:53
texts, concepts and ideas, so this is a
00:42:57
very important point Thank you for
00:42:59
raising it Thank you for coping with it,
00:43:02
using what you already know and
00:43:05
starting to replace this word instinct
00:43:08
is understandable for American readers or
00:43:12
English readers of the organ's article on the
00:43:15
word passion which is for German
00:43:17
readers or for us
00:43:19
Russian readers to a greater extent
00:43:22
Clear. Then what we are talking about
00:43:28
cannot be any other questions, that
00:43:31
is, accordingly, more detailed on the
00:43:34
discussions about these O contradictions, again, in the
00:43:38
text of the lecture, as it turned out, this is there and
00:43:41
hin
00:43:43
went to Wood, and that is, if
00:43:45
you want to go into more detail, you can also read about this,
00:43:48
what exactly are these fundamental
00:43:50
differences,
00:43:52
what was it so difficult to agree on, they
00:43:56
Freud and they don’t swear at all, if at all,
00:43:58
such attempts were undertaken historically
00:44:01
if we talk about this in order
00:44:03
first
00:44:05
in 1926,
00:44:09
Anna Freud comes to Berlin and constructs her
00:44:14
speech at the international
00:44:17
psychoanalytic congress as a
00:44:19
criticism of the idea of ​​Mel and Klein
00:44:22
and little Klein finds herself forced
00:44:25
to respond to this criticism A year later in
00:44:30
Vienna She reads
00:44:31
her report which she
00:44:33
presents is a
00:44:36
consistent answer to Anna Freud's criticism
00:44:39
of her, we see about it,
00:44:43
we discover that the initiator of these
00:44:47
debates, which ultimately lead to
00:44:49
a split in us, to the division of society into three
00:44:52
groups, is still more likely to be Anna
00:44:54
Freud. But on the other hand, perhaps it
00:44:57
influenced Melanie’s thought Klein
00:45:01
because before that she paid little
00:45:04
attention to somehow trying to express
00:45:07
her ideas in writing
00:45:10
and trying to record them and It is
00:45:14
likely that if such a thing we
00:45:18
could say on our provocation on the
00:45:20
part of Anna Freud would not have happened. It is very
00:45:23
likely that not Susan Isaacs with her
00:45:26
article no further than the entire school of object
00:45:29
relations,
00:45:30
most likely the school of Klyanians
00:45:33
would most likely simply not have appeared, since
00:45:38
clinical desk work, some
00:45:41
writing of some texts, much less
00:45:44
some kind of public speaking,
00:45:46
her only more or less voluminous
00:45:50
work was written in 1957 year
00:45:53
shortly before his own death Well, it’s
00:45:57
quite voluminous Yes, I mean a
00:46:00
thin book of a small,
00:46:04
probably
00:46:05
aroma again, which is called envy and
00:46:08
gratitude, it’s also very I recommend
00:46:11
you read it Therefore, unlike Anna
00:46:14
Freud, who is a very
00:46:16
prolific writer, she wrote a large
00:46:20
number of texts that are voluminous in the
00:46:23
true sense of the word, therefore
00:46:25
It is quite possible that these facts are
00:46:28
historical. They allowed
00:46:31
psychoanalytic thought to move further
00:46:34
and today the School of the
00:46:37
client school of object relations
00:46:39
continues to remain perhaps the most
00:46:43
influential in the global psychotic
00:46:45
community and clinically there
00:46:49
will certainly be different
00:46:53
teachers who adhere to different approaches to the
00:46:57
red schools.
00:46:59
the view is rather clinical,
00:47:03
such an eclectic direction. I
00:47:06
mean that in my opinion, you and I have the right to
00:47:11
borrow from any schools from any directions and use in our
00:47:14
work what is personally close to us
00:47:19
in spirit and what suits what works, in
00:47:23
my opinion, for the Linyantsy school of object
00:47:26
relations of modern how Tom Sogdin
00:47:28
is,
00:47:29
without directly declaring it directly, an American,
00:47:33
he does not need to belong to any particular school,
00:47:35
nevertheless, he
00:47:38
is still a representative of the school of object
00:47:40
relations and the school to a greater extent than the
00:47:45
school of ego psychology, which
00:47:48
belongs to
00:47:49
Kerberg. Although it is customary to write him down there,
00:47:52
generally speaking, it is a big question because a
00:47:56
his like this Next year we will
00:47:59
meet, I believe that we will talk about this
00:48:03
at a webinar which, in
00:48:06
limited patients, will be devoted to working with them.
00:48:08
But such Ber is precisely
00:48:10
the one who actively uses the
00:48:12
concept of object relations of
00:48:15
internal relations to work with
00:48:18
neurotic pathologies in in particular,
00:48:23
they focus on the Borderline personality organization and, generally speaking, initially
00:48:26
Give the level of personality organization
00:48:28
which for us today,
00:48:30
after the book, psychoanalytic
00:48:34
diagnostics by Nancy McWilliams, who in
00:48:36
turn is a student and former
00:48:39
employees of Kernberg, and after
00:48:41
her book, probably for us this is already a
00:48:44
given it is clear that there are Levels of
00:48:47
personality organization, how we
00:48:49
define them, what we use for this,
00:48:51
how we continue to work with this, although in
00:48:55
fact this is the development of what
00:48:58
such a large team of his students,
00:49:02
colleagues, he heads a
00:49:05
large-scale project, what he is
00:49:07
doing now in the 60-70s already
00:49:10
last century at Kornev University,
00:49:14
respectively, such working
00:49:19
ideas are very working on concepts, and
00:49:23
moreover, the same Otekerberg
00:49:25
will tell you and me that from the point of view of
00:49:27
clinical benefit, they are theoretical
00:49:31
debates of
00:49:32
clinical benefit, a
00:49:34
working useful one is the concept
00:49:37
according to which the psyche is a
00:49:40
set Yes, a certain
00:49:43
object
00:49:45
representations of oneself, self-
00:49:48
representations and affects between them,
00:49:51
any psyche then of any level
00:49:55
of functioning represents
00:49:58
some kind of set of such
00:50:01
internal dyads where we have a certain
00:50:03
internal object Self-presentation and
00:50:06
this object or presentation of oneself is connected by the
00:50:10
affect between them and further on the
00:50:13
basis of how Once this concept is used, he
00:50:15
will develop his own technique for working
00:50:17
with the borderline level of
00:50:20
personality organization, which is first called
00:50:22
expressive
00:50:23
psychological therapy. And then what
00:50:26
we call it today and the
00:50:29
book may also be available in advance
00:50:33
next year, or maybe if
00:50:35
someone is already working and practicing then already
00:50:38
now this is relevant for you, maybe
00:50:40
now it’s called a psychotherapist,
00:50:43
transfer-focused therapy, transfer-
00:50:45
focused therapy, a
00:50:48
methodological guide into Russian,
00:50:51
translated by three authors. These are
00:50:55
Kenberg Yeomans and Clarkin, they are actually
00:50:58
on the basis of this Central idea
00:51:01
proposed by Kerberg, internal dyads
00:51:03
develop their approach
00:51:05
is effective. working with the borderline
00:51:08
level of personality organization, in contrast
00:51:11
to the neurotic level with which we work
00:51:13
in a classical manner, in that Freud already
00:51:17
suggested to us regarding the setting of
00:51:20
the couch the leading role of interpretation and
00:51:23
other things,
00:51:24
and therefore thank you very much for being so
00:51:28
attentive to the texts,
00:51:34
I honestly decided to start
00:51:37
reading the article Susan Isaacs
00:51:40
before reading
00:51:42
Thomas's article Well, to be honest,
00:51:47
Fiery did not fully master Thomas's article. But
00:51:50
as far as I understood,
00:51:53
this speech by Susan Isaacs at
00:51:57
this psychoanalytic congress
00:51:59
was like an attempt at
00:52:01
reconciliation or something to show that they are not
00:52:04
so strong. so there are significant
00:52:07
differences that there
00:52:11
in theory are little more than the client that she
00:52:14
puts forward and to be honest, it was
00:52:16
also surprising to me, considering that I
00:52:18
read this article that everywhere there the language
00:52:20
refers, as if making references, what
00:52:22
Freud said
00:52:24
And so, based on this, she continues
00:52:26
continues
00:52:28
to give his thoughts why this was the
00:52:31
reason. It was precisely this speech that
00:52:33
became the reason for the
00:52:36
final break and the
00:52:38
division into these groups. It’s
00:52:41
remarkable that they started just what is
00:52:45
chronologically first before
00:52:49
when maybe when it will be possible to
00:52:51
read after some time but perhaps
00:52:54
on the one hand we We must understand with you
00:52:57
that in any organization of any
00:53:01
kind of any direction there are
00:53:05
certain,
00:53:06
some organization automatically appears,
00:53:09
some political
00:53:12
dimensions, some political aspects,
00:53:16
and on the one hand it is clear that not every
00:53:20
attempt at reconciliation Can lead to this very
00:53:22
reconciliation In the end it will lead even more of
00:53:26
which they accused and at least not Klein,
00:53:28
who never said in her texts or her
00:53:30
speeches
00:53:33
that she is in opposition to any
00:53:35
Freudian ideas, so she
00:53:38
always tries to remind what is similar And
00:53:42
Freud about this and Freud about something similar,
00:53:45
however, to how Melanie Klein was
00:53:48
accused of distorting
00:53:52
everyone’s thought about this, that she attributes to Freud
00:53:56
those ideas that he tells me about;
00:53:59
moreover, you and I no longer know how
00:54:03
Freud himself could have reacted to this story
00:54:05
because that in 43 he was
00:54:08
no longer alive. As you and I know,
00:54:10
therefore, this is rather a struggle between a
00:54:14
political struggle. And between
00:54:17
those who want to follow Anna Freud,
00:54:21
it is clear that she Freud occupied a
00:54:23
privileged position in the
00:54:25
psychoanalytic community due to the fact
00:54:27
that she is the daughter of Freud and Melanie Klein as
00:54:32
her originally further 127 years, essentially a
00:54:35
direct rival in the field of child
00:54:39
psychoanalysis
00:54:40
That is why Anna Freud begins this
00:54:44
controversy, they challenge Melanie Klein,
00:54:49
they are probably Freudman as psychoanalysts, yes they
00:54:52
could have assumed this, they might have wanted
00:54:56
leadership in this area of ​​child
00:54:58
psychoanalysis to have some kind of primacy, and
00:55:02
then such a pretty one appears an
00:55:05
authoritative rival in turn with
00:55:08
followers
00:55:10
who might really
00:55:13
want to defeat and we can
00:55:15
assume that he is not Freud, this is quite
00:55:18
clear. On the one hand, such an
00:55:20
exclusive special position is generally in her
00:55:24
memories. She says that
00:55:28
this position was quite difficult for her,
00:55:31
such a role because I really wanted
00:55:34
to have some kind of my own
00:55:37
psychoanalytic face, but not because
00:55:39
Anna Freud is still Sigmund Freud and that’s
00:55:43
all, on the one hand, the situation is special, on
00:55:45
the other hand, with what it is connected then it is
00:55:49
not very clear about ourselves and accordingly
00:55:51
we no longer know how Freud
00:55:53
reacted to all this But nevertheless,
00:55:57
Yes, Isaacs is trying to show that
00:56:00
parallels can be drawn. Freud has
00:56:03
these ideas. However, reconciliation becomes
00:56:06
simply impossible, that is, they, as well as about
00:56:09
this article and speech, say that
00:56:12
this is a distortion of Freud’s ideas, starting with the fact
00:56:14
that once in an amazing
00:56:17
paradoxical way, Melanie Klein was
00:56:20
almost the only one who immediately
00:56:22
accepted Freud’s idea and would work in
00:56:26
1920 on the other side of the pleasure principle
00:56:28
about the existence of the death drive,
00:56:30
most psychoanalysts did not accept this idea
00:56:34
and continued with it for 43 years.
00:56:39
in the
00:56:43
lectures about this there is so that these
00:56:45
times do not waste it was not the client
00:56:47
just on the basis of her clinical
00:56:49
work with young children and we could
00:56:52
say that those Children whose children
00:56:55
were brought to her are those whom today we
00:56:58
would diagnose psychiatrists with
00:57:00
early childhood schizophrenia
00:57:02
autism spectrum disorder children
00:57:07
disturbed children neurotic in working with
00:57:10
them
00:57:11
Klein found confirmation of this idea about the
00:57:14
existence of a death drive from the very
00:57:16
beginning of life about the work of this drive in the
00:57:19
psyche. Therefore, she
00:57:22
agreed with her, unlike many
00:57:24
other leading analysts of that time
00:57:27
who were with Freud on this We
00:57:29
categorically disagree; moreover,
00:57:31
Klein herself did not go through her own personal
00:57:35
analysis. They were close. In the sense of
00:57:38
discussing various things about Karl
00:57:42
Abraham, who in
00:57:44
turn was engaged in treatment, attempts to understand and
00:57:48
treat psychoses, what we today
00:57:51
call schizophrenia are psychoses, which
00:57:53
we today
00:57:57
called bipolar effective disorder. would like to
00:58:01
discuss them They are in many ways about what is
00:58:03
similar This Freudian idea is very
00:58:06
important
00:58:09
unfortunately to a great extent Yes, also
00:58:12
one of the tragedies of one’s own life is not enough
00:58:14
Klein Abraham dies After 18
00:58:18
months and a year and a half Approximately after the
00:58:20
start of their joint work together
00:58:23
and including Before this discussion, she has a
00:58:26
training analysis, they have the opportunity to
00:58:28
discuss each other’s clinical work,
00:58:32
and by the time the
00:58:34
discussion is about contradictions, not the first not the
00:58:37
second, Abraham is already there too, therefore, there is no one to
00:58:39
stand up for the small ones; Klein;
00:58:43
moreover, yes. For you, too, in lectures, I wrote about this on a
00:58:46
personal level. Quite
00:58:51
likely certain relationships are being clarified
00:58:53
because in the opposition
00:58:55
to the quel not Klein it turns out that her daughter is
00:58:59
one of them with her husband, they generally
00:59:03
lead such as we could today
00:59:06
say a persecution defined there is not enough
00:59:09
damn
00:59:10
the psychoanalytic community,
00:59:12
accordingly, some such attempt and
00:59:16
knowledge and the body just begins its
00:59:18
article with In addition to what Soap is not saying about these
00:59:21
accusations, Klein is that she is a
00:59:25
psychoanalytic heretic,
00:59:28
we also have curious words, on the
00:59:31
one hand,
00:59:32
psychoanalysis in relation to which Freud
00:59:35
tried and dreamed all his professional life for it to be as
00:59:41
scientific knowledge of the scientific paradigm and at the
00:59:44
same time with us a word appears and a completely
00:59:46
different one from the religious field to heretics,
00:59:51
like those who are against what should be
00:59:55
indisputable in one or another confession,
00:59:59
begin to show themselves Well,
01:00:02
actually, for example, it was not a klyandista, you
01:00:04
probably already had a course on the history of psychoanalysis
01:00:08
in general, or if you didn’t have it, it was
01:00:12
necessary will they still be the
01:00:14
first
01:00:15
such figure whom they are trying to
01:00:18
drive out and make
01:00:21
her ideas disappear into oblivion? Freud himself may know about this;
01:00:27
he broke up more than once;
01:00:35
he broke up with his most outstanding students;
01:00:47
which in general Jung
01:00:50
leads to the creation of another direction of
01:00:54
psychotherapeutic analytical
01:00:56
psychology is not a psychological school, it is a
01:00:58
separate one, but a psychotherapeutic direction
01:01:01
further from Taranga about which we
01:01:04
know practically nothing who wrote In
01:01:08
connection with this, the gap is also happening, I
01:01:11
recommend it to you, it is unlikely that you will see a
01:01:15
particular mention of this book from
01:01:17
the ram is called a birth trauma,
01:01:20
respectively,
01:01:21
such Freudian logic is
01:01:26
to part with those of his
01:01:29
students and followers who,
01:01:33
we can also assume, offer
01:01:36
some too
01:01:38
original, too original
01:01:40
concepts or
01:01:43
criticize Freudian ideas of one
01:01:46
kind or another, therefore there is little only
01:01:49
one of you are only one in a series It is quite
01:01:52
likely that Freud himself, without the
01:01:56
influence of Anna Freud, might not have even
01:02:00
noticed
01:02:02
her existence; she did
01:02:06
not particularly speak out on her ideas, only
01:02:10
labeling her as some kind of
01:02:13
psychoanalytic heretic. And therefore, it is quite
01:02:15
possible that we understand such a conflict with you
01:02:19
that conflicts are what
01:02:22
lead to development,
01:02:25
the stages of development, let’s remember all the stages
01:02:28
that Freud suggests, if we have a
01:02:31
psychological education, we
01:02:33
know something about this, the development of the psyche occurs
01:02:37
only in connection with and thanks to crises of
01:02:41
development, that is, conflicts, their
01:02:43
resolution of some kind, therefore, any
01:02:46
conflict it has some consequences and it is
01:02:49
quite likely that the consequence of the discussion of
01:02:51
contradictions, the causes and reasons for which
01:02:55
were different, the struggle for primacy, the desire for
01:03:00
some kind of recognition, the acquisition of one’s own
01:03:03
unique identity, led to a very important
01:03:07
consequence for us, for you and me, not in the
01:03:10
sense of the need to belong to
01:03:12
some group as this is
01:03:14
required by British psychoanalysts in the sense
01:03:17
that it is likely that such
01:03:19
important ideas would not have appeared and such
01:03:22
schools would not have taken shape if this
01:03:26
conflict between Anna Freud and Melanie
01:03:29
Klein had not happened since Afrit
01:03:31
most likely would have simply
01:03:35
ignored melanifleina in this case she would
01:03:38
hardly have
01:03:39
gone out
01:03:41
somewhere especially from her office and
01:03:45
started writing something out or
01:03:47
started articulating something through her
01:03:49
students because since I already said
01:03:51
the article, she’s asking everyone to write it down in language
01:03:54
because it’s possible let’s have sex
01:03:57
like that
01:04:09
Yes, because perhaps UAZ is such a more
01:04:14
structured
01:04:16
way of thinking, such a greater ability to
01:04:20
structurally present something in a text,
01:04:23
in contrast to little I don’t swear, probably
01:04:26
such a story is understandable and well-known. It happens
01:04:29
that clinically very gifted people,
01:04:32
unfortunately, are
01:04:33
hardly able to write something in the sense of
01:04:37
some articles and the opposite is also true: those
01:04:41
who are very strong in
01:04:44
theorizing about something
01:04:46
at the same time may not be very
01:04:49
successful clinical
01:04:52
practitioners,
01:04:54
so probably don’t curse your
01:04:58
limitations. It looks
01:05:03
like some kind of attempt to reconcile
01:05:08
ideas and reconcile schools, but the trend is already
01:05:12
different and therefore in in the end, it all
01:05:15
ends in a
01:05:16
split, division into different groups, but
01:05:20
in any case, at least not the expulsion of
01:05:23
Melanie Klein, there
01:05:27
may be some other questions,
01:05:41
unconscious fantasies are described several times, this is a way
01:05:43
of thinking, that this is some kind of subjective
01:05:45
interpretation of our experience in the world. I have a
01:05:49
question:
01:05:51
how much of a line is there between the
01:05:55
unconscious? and conscious
01:05:57
fantasies, that is, Do I
01:06:00
understand correctly that the process of fantasizing itself,
01:06:02
that this fantasizing
01:06:04
can be unconscious, and the results of this process
01:06:07
can be Quite conscious if
01:06:09
it is our giving meaning to something there?
01:06:22
speech That is,
01:06:25
when Isaacs and the organ are discussing,
01:06:28
it tells us that, as you said,
01:06:31
unconscious fantasizing, that is,
01:06:34
what happens in the unconscious as
01:06:37
opposed to conscious fantasies, but
01:06:39
we could say something about what
01:06:42
we usually speak in Russian then about
01:06:45
some dreams, when we
01:06:48
consciously dream about something, they say that this is a
01:06:50
process of a completely different kind of a
01:06:53
completely different register, they are
01:06:56
universal in nature, they are
01:07:00
essentially just structures for the
01:07:04
embodiment of one’s own and for
01:07:07
something otherwise difficult to explain to
01:07:10
happen in in our mental this
01:07:13
means as a consequence in external life
01:07:15
and maybe it will become clearer if we
01:07:17
remember the stolen ones, he lists remembering
01:07:20
what unconscious fantasies are
01:07:24
inherent in all people, if our dreams are
01:07:28
there, they can be some kind of unique,
01:07:30
some kind of original subjective, then he is
01:07:34
talking about objective ones
01:07:36
structures And generally speaking,
01:07:39
Freud already tells us something similar when he
01:07:43
talks about the fact that it seems that he is
01:07:46
different in his patients
01:07:47
and in children and in his own and the children
01:07:52
he observes, he sees
01:07:56
some manifestations at about the age of 4-6 years
01:07:59
identical similar
01:08:02
which
01:08:04
could be described as something that has
01:08:08
long been described for thousands of years. And back in the form of a
01:08:15
person who has a classical education and is
01:08:18
knowledgeable in generally very
01:08:22
fond of the ancient classical culture of
01:08:25
languages, including the ancient ones who knew He
01:08:28
sees something and remembers what is
01:08:32
similar to him I read about something similar When I
01:08:35
read the myth of Oedipus by ancient Greek
01:08:38
authors who also describe then
01:08:41
something inherent in people that suddenly
01:08:44
suddenly Begins for some reason to appear and
01:08:48
manifest itself as a question about reality and
01:08:51
how to
01:08:52
psychoanalysis In general,
01:08:55
since Freud And how do they find out about it
01:09:00
how the differences between the sexes are what
01:09:03
precedes and, like, in a complex its
01:09:07
unfolding, how the differences between the sexes
01:09:10
are recognized by children who have added
01:09:12
absolutely never any other animals and
01:09:17
anything happening between them of a
01:09:19
sexual nature, they definitely did not see
01:09:22
any Soviet kindergarten, these
01:09:24
children did not go and in rows and not
01:09:28
differentiated by gender on the potty,
01:09:30
no one planted them and there was a quiet hour when all
01:09:33
this was discovered and followed, they
01:09:35
definitely didn’t have it and they never saw their mother’s head in the bath
01:09:38
And their dad was also never
01:09:41
naked like theirs and they have
01:09:44
everything the same thing Yes, and essentially Freud
01:09:46
But then, in connection with his
01:09:48
conflict with the filming and their
01:09:52
separation,
01:09:53
the break that occurs, he begins to bypass
01:09:57
these topics, begins to bypass these topics,
01:10:00
although the
01:10:03
so-called archaic
01:10:05
Legacy appears in his works, that is, what is
01:10:08
transferred from the unconscious to the next
01:10:12
unconscious what makes all of us people of
01:10:16
all eras similar
01:10:20
and go into the complex while part of
01:10:23
this archaic heritage at some
01:10:26
point it begins to manifest itself and for approximately
01:10:29
everyone at the same age
01:10:31
it begins to manifest itself further and in
01:10:34
this, in my opinion the usefulness of studying
01:10:38
the history of psychoanalysis further is the desire
01:10:42
to be in the Field of materialist
01:10:46
positivist science, it faces
01:10:50
great complexity, that is, then we would
01:10:52
have to tell you that,
01:10:55
firstly, the search for some kind of material
01:10:57
substrate of some kind of carrier
01:11:00
unconsciously where it is located
01:11:03
territorially
01:11:04
what in which organ bodily Also takes
01:11:09
place then we would have to
01:11:12
tell you that
01:11:14
in this unconscious there is some kind of
01:11:16
hereditary transmission and something like that
01:11:19
begins to work and is launched at
01:11:22
certain moments of our life,
01:11:25
manifesting itself not in consciousness but in
01:11:29
our experiences in how we
01:11:31
begin to build relationships and in desires
01:11:36
Freud talks about it this way and that, but
01:11:39
maybe the problem is that the structure of DNA had
01:11:42
not yet been discovered at that time,
01:11:45
nothing is known about this, although
01:11:47
today it is unknown where it
01:11:49
could be conditionally in in which genes
01:11:53
this or that is localized, let's say the launch of a
01:11:58
type of complex, some Genes are responsible,
01:12:01
most likely we will not know anything about this
01:12:02
since genetic scientists do
01:12:06
not ask these questions on the other hand. It is likely that
01:12:08
it is generally difficult
01:12:10
to determine, if at all possible, but then
01:12:14
we will offer some kind of analogy conditionally
01:12:17
When in our genes are
01:12:19
programmed that at a certain
01:12:21
age, yes, there around the age of
01:12:23
11-12 years, our
01:12:27
endocrine system begins
01:12:28
to function differently than before,
01:12:30
those hormones
01:12:33
that were not produced before begin to be produced and
01:12:37
secondary sexual characteristics begin to appear,
01:12:39
other bodily changes
01:12:43
begin to occur in us which
01:12:45
turn us from a child into an adult, an
01:12:47
adult individual, that is,
01:12:50
accordingly, the answer to the question: Where
01:12:52
were these hormones, they
01:12:55
were not anywhere They are
01:12:58
coded, programmed that
01:13:01
exactly at a certain age this will
01:13:02
happen in some genes, probably
01:13:06
something similar to these about that
01:13:11
structures of one of which is to
01:13:13
go into the complex. And generally speaking, we
01:13:15
could say that
01:13:18
in answer to your question, that go to the
01:13:21
complex is precisely one of these
01:13:23
unconscious fantasies,
01:13:25
no one consciously fantasizes about this,
01:13:27
and the myth of Oedipus itself is not about that,
01:13:30
of course Oedipus lay on the bank of the river the
01:13:36
same day and thought how
01:13:40
great it would be to kill his own father and
01:13:43
marry his own mother. I’ll
01:13:44
go and make the fairy tale
01:13:48
become a reality. That’s why
01:13:51
we have Go along and in different
01:13:55
variations in the future
01:13:57
this is a tragedy of something this happens,
01:14:03
the Greeks talk about fate,
01:14:06
fate Go by is that this must
01:14:09
happen
01:14:10
regardless of whether he wants it
01:14:13
or whether he doesn’t want it, it will also happen in
01:14:16
such a way that he will
01:14:19
not become conscious. He will find himself in a certain situation
01:14:24
that is outside of him, the desire is outside of his control
01:14:28
is placed and Fred says that it looks like
01:14:33
something similar is starting to happen to children around the age of 4-6 years,
01:14:37
but none of this is some kind of
01:14:39
conscious decision or choice, not
01:14:42
some kind of dream, something begins to influence
01:14:46
us, he tells us Yes,
01:14:48
the unconscious influences, but little does not damn further,
01:14:51
the Susans continue to speak after them and It seems
01:14:54
that this is precisely an unconscious
01:14:57
fantasy. As you said in the question, something
01:15:01
that
01:15:02
manifests itself in addition to consciousness but at the
01:15:06
same time greatly influences our external life,
01:15:09
others
01:15:11
list such classic fantasies,
01:15:14
for example, unconscious fantasy. That
01:15:16
is, this structure forming,
01:15:19
for example, castration fantasy
01:15:22
castration fantasy further
01:15:25
French analysts, in particular, will be
01:15:27
active on this topic of castration, the same
01:15:30
Francoise Daltou, which is,
01:15:33
in addition to so not cadet psychoanalysis,
01:15:36
books about how the psyche is structured, in
01:15:40
particular the book unconscious
01:15:42
body image where she concepts of castration from
01:15:46
exclusively
01:15:47
phallic castration to level of
01:15:51
genitality spreads much more
01:15:54
widely and says that the first
01:15:57
castration, the transition from stage to stage of
01:16:00
Freud's,
01:16:01
is defined precisely by the experience of
01:16:04
castration; this is the first castration that
01:16:06
we encounter; oral
01:16:10
castration; weaning; then we have anal castration in
01:16:13
toilet training; and then the
01:16:15
same Freud's discovery of the
01:16:18
threat of loss of the penis in boys and,
01:16:23
from Freud's point of view,
01:16:26
girls' experiences of their own castration
01:16:29
due to the absence of just the penis
01:16:31
Dalto says that the first castration is
01:16:33
weaning, and if we are from the ram,
01:16:36
which turned out to be completely forgotten, he
01:16:38
remembered, he moves even further in the sense
01:16:43
earlier
01:16:45
ontologically speaking of the fact that it seems that the
01:16:47
first castration is our birth,
01:16:50
castration as the imposition of
01:16:54
restrictions on omnipotence
01:16:58
on the manifestation of our desire when I
01:17:01
get everything I want is not
01:17:04
limited by anything when I want to the extent that I
01:17:08
want as a sarality while
01:17:10
breastfeeding occurs No
01:17:13
special efforts to
01:17:15
independently search for
01:17:18
consumption and there is no need to take food in
01:17:23
such a good situation, the child is hungry.
01:17:26
He made it clear to his mother that he was hungry; his mother
01:17:30
provided him with a breast full of milk,
01:17:33
which will satisfy all his needs,
01:17:37
and a certain process will ensure
01:17:40
breastfeeding; when weaning from the
01:17:44
breast, castration occurs, imposing
01:17:47
restrictions on this omnipotence, that is,
01:17:50
I only wanted I was already given, I have to
01:17:53
do something else additional,
01:17:55
but probably birth
01:17:58
and if we imagine such a
01:18:01
prosperous and intrauterine
01:18:03
existence is an
01:18:05
ideal state, therefore all these
01:18:08
attempts
01:18:09
to comprehend, including various
01:18:14
religious ideas of mystical
01:18:18
experiences, as an expression of the oceanic
01:18:20
feeling, that is, what We are experiencing
01:18:23
when we
01:18:24
are inside the mother’s body and
01:18:28
if everything is fine,
01:18:31
everything we want is there, even in contrast
01:18:35
to the pre-oral story when we are
01:18:38
breastfed, that is, after all, there is
01:18:39
a child there, he should already
01:18:44
show at least some kind of activity of his own if he is not he wo
01:18:48
n’t be able to suckle yet And in utero everything is
01:18:51
fully provided for, he does
01:18:53
n’t need to do anything there at all, on the other hand,
01:18:56
if it doesn’t happen, then we won’t be born, we won’t be
01:19:01
able to live like
01:19:05
modern medical possibilities, other
01:19:07
yes In any case, with extremely rare
01:19:10
exceptions, even some then difficult
01:19:13
situations will appear in any case and Mom
01:19:16
will remain alive in any case, and if there is a
01:19:18
more
01:19:19
natural sense, imagine such a natural
01:19:22
story if the child does not
01:19:27
want to be born because he feels
01:19:29
too good there. He does not want to experience this castration
01:19:31
and the mother does not want to give birth to him
01:19:34
because that she is also very good, for example, in
01:19:37
our current realities, this is when
01:19:41
a pregnancy is carried beyond term, it also seems like it’s
01:19:43
time to give birth,
01:19:45
the woman wears everything And wears
01:19:49
then
01:19:50
it would lead to the death of both
01:19:53
the experience if the woman cannot
01:19:57
give birth, the child cannot be born, she does not
01:20:00
want to give birth, he does not want to be born then
01:20:02
both die, respectively, this is
01:20:05
castration then in an amazing way
01:20:08
also the living conditions of experiencing
01:20:12
this crisis of this first before the conflict
01:20:16
inside so well I don’t want to go anywhere but
01:20:20
I need to go outside because life is further there, life
01:20:23
inside the mother cannot
01:20:26
continue And then the first conflict And
01:20:29
probably some first unconscious a
01:20:31
fantasy that in many ways
01:20:35
can manifest itself in the future,
01:20:37
respectively, everything is correct, the idea of ​​the window, you
01:20:41
very accurately voiced it, following Aiza,
01:20:44
little does not The client says that it seems
01:20:47
that unconscious fantasies are what
01:20:51
structures the unconscious, this is how
01:20:54
the unconscious works, these attempts
01:20:57
to understand And what is actually there in this
01:20:59
unconscious address Freud, on the one
01:21:02
hand, tells us there is repressed
01:21:05
at first, he believes So something that was
01:21:08
outside conditionally
01:21:10
being unacceptable begins to be
01:21:14
repressed into the unconscious a little later,
01:21:17
again there
01:21:19
will not be much further development of these ideas because it is
01:21:21
too close to what Jung is doing this
01:21:24
brings psychoanalysis too close to something that Freud
01:21:28
really wants to get away from, in fact, that’s why he
01:21:31
ends the relationship too close, we
01:21:35
then find ourselves in the area of ​​the non-
01:21:37
scientific by scientific methods, not
01:21:42
confirmed as the area of ​​Well then,
01:21:44
the mystical, so the area of ​​religious
01:21:47
ideas of various
01:21:50
attempts to understand what is there And Freud in order for the
01:21:53
mechanism of repression to explain,
01:21:56
he says it seems like there is some kind of
01:21:59
repressed one
01:22:00
to which then further in the individual
01:22:03
psyche all this begins to be
01:22:05
attracted from the outside, what is this first
01:22:08
repressed from where and the only thing he
01:22:11
tells us about is that it has never
01:22:13
been conscious,
01:22:16
so the question arises what is
01:22:19
it what is it like, what does
01:22:22
it look like and don’t screw it up? Yes, and such an
01:22:25
innovative idea is that it seems to be an
01:22:28
unconscious fantasy in this sense.
01:22:30
It does not at all contradict Freud,
01:22:33
who himself told us that with
01:22:36
drives directly, we never
01:22:39
deal only with certain virgin attractions,
01:22:43
which is why Thank you for
01:22:45
translating so carefully, since very
01:22:49
often the attraction to life is translated as the
01:22:53
conviction of death with the pretext and For us
01:22:57
in Russian, this then means that the subject
01:23:00
plays some active role in this, I am
01:23:05
attracted to life or I am death But in fact
01:23:10
in fact, the translation option is not entirely into
01:23:14
Russian and unsuccessful, since rather we are
01:23:17
talking about the attraction of life and in the treatment
01:23:20
of death, that is, we, as subjects,
01:23:22
find ourselves rather in a passive position and
01:23:25
something many times superior to us that
01:23:28
attracts us to itself and then the individual
01:23:31
psyche turns out to be the field of this
01:23:34
conflict between two
01:23:37
drives that are superior to life and
01:23:40
death. You could even write it with a capital letter then,
01:23:44
and accordingly there was
01:23:47
a certain one telling us that yes, then these
01:23:50
drives that cannot be accommodated in the
01:23:54
individual psyche, much less
01:23:56
can they be conscious in any way, they are somehow
01:23:58
in the psyche must be presented and it
01:24:01
just tells us that they are
01:24:02
presented, they see these
01:24:04
unconscious fantasies that are universal
01:24:06
for all people,
01:24:09
protection from them, and so on, etc. It is they who are
01:24:12
conscious fantasies of themselves and
01:24:14
she manifests them over two
01:24:20
sets of these fantasies, the first
01:24:23
set is paranoid schizoid
01:24:25
fantasies
01:24:27
like since those that we have find their
01:24:31
embodiment in these fantasies and bad
01:24:34
breasts are good breasts the
01:24:36
second type of fantasy that
01:24:39
interests her further Freud already wrote a lot
01:24:42
about castration wrote about
01:24:44
oedipal he wrote about the parental
01:24:46
couple there then later other analysts
01:24:48
will write go depressive about the
01:24:52
unification of the already holistic the object of this
01:24:54
integral breast which was
01:24:58
damaged at the previous stage of communication by attacks
01:25:02
on it
01:25:04
and at the same time she tells us they are not
01:25:07
the only ones
01:25:09
that are the ones that she discovers and
01:25:13
opens
01:25:14
therefore further to A from the action that the
01:25:18
body discusses they talk about what is
01:25:20
similar to unconscious fantasy is
01:25:23
exactly what underlies how it is
01:25:27
structured, what
01:25:31
the unconscious contains, and then they say
01:25:34
that this is the basis of mental life in general,
01:25:37
that nothing else simply exists,
01:25:40
the basis of thinking,
01:25:42
then we have peonies and all the rest,
01:25:50
some final final question
01:25:52
to complete I
01:25:56
have shifted a little bit Confusion
01:25:58
occurred over time some
01:26:03
or while Can I ask a question Good
01:26:06
evening
01:26:08
then it turns out that this is an
01:26:10
unconscious fantasy, it is not static,
01:26:14
it is dynamic Well, that’s how I
01:26:18
imagined until this moment that we have
01:26:21
some kind of something- then what we have,
01:26:24
for example, is loaded with an effect and we repress it
01:26:27
unconsciously, then it is resolved by the affect,
01:26:28
it becomes static, as if it freezes.
01:26:31
But in this case it turns out If it’s a
01:26:34
fantasy, that is, it’s some kind of
01:26:36
action that happens in the unconscious, the
01:26:39
action happens
01:26:42
wonderfully,
01:26:46
then due to what it turns out this
01:26:49
action is how it is fueled
01:26:52
Well, due to what does it happen, what is it
01:26:55
fueled by And what drives then
01:26:57
directs if this is so If I
01:26:59
understood correctly thank you thank you for the question You
01:27:03
just very much
01:27:04
expressed
01:27:06
in the Klinian
01:27:08
version this idea about what
01:27:11
unconscious fantasy is When What he writes to us about
01:27:14
this is a process, and that is, it is
01:27:16
something dynamic. That is why Klein
01:27:20
does not speak about stages of development,
01:27:22
unlike Freud, as if we went through
01:27:25
this certain age, resolved
01:27:27
some kind of conflict that was relevant for this age,
01:27:30
and forgot about it forever
01:27:34
they have moved on to the next stage somewhere, or
01:27:36
if they haven’t, then she is in some kind of
01:27:39
static state somewhere
01:27:42
unconsciously then she is in a
01:27:45
different way, it’s all always alive,
01:27:48
she manifests herself all the time, which is
01:27:50
why Paranoia on the schizoid position the
01:27:52
depressive position of the one in between
01:27:55
all the time all people move again and again the
01:27:59
performance may be a little different as
01:28:02
remembering the myths
01:28:03
antifreight tells us there is some kind of
01:28:06
folk representation on some kind of
01:28:09
folk myth there was a folk myth further than it then the Greek
01:28:11
tragedians begin to rework some of
01:28:14
their version to suggest the development of events
01:28:17
atoms
01:28:19
their own what -that version
01:28:22
further, some moreover, this
01:28:27
manifests itself again and again in every new
01:28:30
human life in every new era.
01:28:32
If we look as if somehow
01:28:36
different and today we
01:28:38
take some cultural products there, we
01:28:41
can also find the same structure, the
01:28:43
same myth about Oedipus, still the same
01:28:46
murder of the father and Marriage, relationship with the
01:28:50
mother With the mother figure, that
01:28:52
is, these proto structures have some
01:28:55
limited volume And what moves them, what
01:28:58
gives them movement, the answer to this question is
01:29:00
the unconscious,
01:29:03
that is, thus through the
01:29:05
individual psyche manifests itself
01:29:09
unfolds unconsciously
01:29:12
what drives the DNA structure Why at
01:29:16
some point it starts
01:29:18
[music]
01:29:20
to work so that the
01:29:22
secretion of hormones changes what moves it
01:29:30
Genes that are responsible in turn the
01:29:34
energetic component for the
01:29:36
energetic component of this process
01:29:39
Similarly here we could say what
01:29:41
drives
01:29:43
the unconscious main the energy
01:29:45
of which
01:29:46
has a swan-like character The
01:29:49
energetic component The
01:29:51
energetic component of the unfolding of the
01:29:56
individual psychic which in turn
01:29:59
is always conflicting is the energy of the
01:30:01
life drive is the energy of the
01:30:05
death drive that is what Freud is doing with
01:30:07
attempts to understand what in the work of
01:30:11
1920 precisely in the direction of the
01:30:13
pleasure principle when she discovers the
01:30:15
passion for death is its own
01:30:18
energy, which can surpass in an
01:30:23
amazing way, it would seem, the
01:30:25
swan-like energy of the attraction of life.
01:30:28
Well, although further further
01:30:31
works of French analysts, Andrei
01:30:34
Green in particular, will write to us about this
01:30:37
and say that it seems that there are also
01:30:40
third variants of drives, the so-called
01:30:45
attraction of separation, in contrast to the
01:30:48
attraction of life and deaths which are all the
01:30:51
same this and the other for unification are
01:30:56
directed this is a certain one at the object then
01:30:58
present Yes, he also drives the third
01:31:01
therefore the unconscious drives
01:31:05
we could say
01:31:07
in the religious paradigm any is
01:31:11
said not any
01:31:14
in many in many it is said that the
01:31:18
meaning of human life lies in
01:31:22
so that the divine can manifest itself through him.
01:31:28
Similarly, in our paradigm we
01:31:31
could say that the meaning of
01:31:34
human life then individual concrete
01:31:37
life is so that
01:31:39
the unconscious can manifest itself through it. Here many
01:31:41
very questions appear
01:31:43
Moses he tourist religion
01:31:45
Freudian work you will still study
01:31:48
read many
01:31:50
important interesting points
01:31:53
Freud's conflictual relationship with the
01:31:58
confession of which he, being a Jew, by
01:32:01
definition belongs to Judaism and
01:32:05
that is why he
01:32:08
tries to analyze the figure of Moses in a certain
01:32:10
way and interprets it in many ways with
01:32:13
these conflictual relationships, it is precisely
01:32:15
his break with Jung that occurs
01:32:17
and at the same time we can see what is
01:32:21
likely
01:32:23
something similar appears if we
01:32:27
try to answer such fundamental
01:32:28
questions as the one you asked, what
01:32:31
drives What is the root cause, something
01:32:35
moves, let's try to understand what And
01:32:38
what exactly moves here the answers are very
01:32:41
similar as the answers are similar, yes, that is,
01:32:44
then the unconscious moves and the goal of
01:32:46
the unconscious is to manifest through the
01:32:48
individual psyche, as modern
01:32:51
physicists tell us that there are
01:32:54
two largely
01:32:57
opposite, contradictory
01:32:59
hypotheses about the origin of the Universe. The
01:33:02
Big Bang Theory and String Theory,
01:33:05
if we ask the question: What started
01:33:08
this process, regardless of whether it is like this
01:33:11
or like that, then a
01:33:14
number of modern physicists will tell us about the fact
01:33:17
that there is probably some kind of root cause
01:33:19
that is very similar to this
01:33:23
is interpreted in various religious
01:33:26
directions,
01:33:28
something
01:33:30
triggered the
01:33:32
emergence of
01:33:34
the Universe similar here we are talking about
01:33:38
the unconscious about what
01:33:40
drives then it because its desire to
01:33:43
manifest itself through the individual psyche
01:33:50
can it be some kind of higher power it
01:33:53
turns out also some kind of unnamed
01:33:57
higher power
01:33:58
again. That is, if we say this, I
01:34:03
mean
01:34:05
religious ideas of such
01:34:09
esoteric
01:34:12
internal, at a certain level,
01:34:14
understanding of order, if we
01:34:18
abstract from such simpler to
01:34:22
mass ideas about the nature of
01:34:25
the divine, then by and large We are
01:34:28
everywhere We will see that there, too, we are talking about a certain
01:34:30
force
01:34:31
that is
01:34:33
embodied, the
01:34:35
intention of which to get the appearance
01:34:38
to become manifested somehow to be embodied and,
01:34:40
accordingly, here we use a
01:34:42
different word but we mean that exactly. It
01:34:45
seems that Freud did not want to draw
01:34:49
these parallels, probably
01:34:52
in many ways obvious, for various reasons since
01:34:54
physicists talk about what was launched by a
01:34:58
certain force, there was a certain primary
01:35:01
intention,
01:35:02
approximately the same thing,
01:35:05
for example, in Judaism in cabareda, we can
01:35:10
find very similar things, that is, not
01:35:13
anthropomortization,
01:35:15
anthropomorphic ideas about God,
01:35:17
since
01:35:19
[music]
01:35:21
they are like some kind of super superior to
01:35:26
a person, the night is similar to something like him,
01:35:29
respectively,
01:35:31
this is a certain force as in the work itself.
01:35:34
On the other side of the pleasure principle,
01:35:35
Freud says that the individual
01:35:39
psyche is not a field of
01:35:43
conflict between two forces that are superior to
01:35:46
humans: one force of
01:35:48
the life drive, the other force of the death drive,
01:35:55
such are ours interesting global
01:35:58
fundamental questions have arisen, therefore,
01:36:01
and Freud's description of the unconscious is in
01:36:04
many ways similar to the description of the
01:36:08
divine nature of the attempt, the
01:36:12
unconscious itself tells us we never
01:36:14
deal only with some of its
01:36:16
manifestations
01:36:17
the unconscious there is no time the
01:36:19
unconscious
01:36:22
opposites coexist there are no
01:36:26
conflicts between anything
01:36:30
the unconscious is nowhere and everywhere
01:36:33
at the same time We cannot localize in any way
01:36:35
in time and space to us.
01:36:38
It is clear, moreover, we cannot
01:36:41
comprehend it directly with the capabilities of
01:36:43
our human mind because
01:36:45
our human mind is unconsciously
01:36:47
significantly superior,
01:36:49
we can only try to
01:36:53
notice some manifestations of it, detect it and
01:36:59
somehow deal with them to work in order to
01:37:01
help people who suffer
01:37:05
from His manifestations,
01:37:07
similar to the description of the
01:37:11
divine,
01:37:13
similar, but attempts, yes Again, Freud, I
01:37:18
still
01:37:19
get out of this,
01:37:21
my reasons for this, is to get out of this
01:37:25
religious field,
01:37:28
such a positivist science. However, we
01:37:30
are returning again as I myself am
01:37:33
forced return to the fact that
01:37:37
we do not know what we do not by the methods of science,
01:37:40
we cannot conduct a scientific
01:37:43
experiment
01:37:44
not
01:37:47
clinically in an office there, we cannot
01:37:50
provide
01:37:55
modern science with
01:37:56
the results that it would require from
01:37:59
us so that psychoanalysis can be
01:38:02
recognized as scientific knowledge, but
01:38:04
maybe already Today we
01:38:06
have much more freedom in this
01:38:08
regard and, in fact, if this is
01:38:11
necessary or we can
01:38:13
afford to do what we do without
01:38:15
proving to
01:38:17
various other sciences that we are among them.
01:38:23
Thank you very much for your
01:38:26
most interesting questions. I am very glad that many of
01:38:30
you And We managed to read the article and
01:38:33
watch the lectures, and then I believe that
01:38:36
next year we will meet again,
01:38:39
we will talk about limited patients
01:38:41
and work with them, and I wish you
01:38:45
further success in your studies and, most
01:38:47
importantly, study with pleasure,
01:38:49
try to get maximum pleasure from
01:38:52
this, I want to receive it.
01:38:56
Thank you Olga Sergeevna Thank you

Description:

Подать заявку на основные программы обучения в ВЕИП: https://eeip.ru/obrazovanie/ Подать заявку на очные и онлайн курсы повышения квалификации ВЕИП: https://nic-eeip.ru/ Онлайн журнал Psy.Media: https://psy.media/ Регистрация на День Открытых Дверей: https://eeip.ru/obrazovanie/dod/ группа ВК (курсы и до.образование): https://vk.com/do.veip YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/EeipRu Группа ВК (Дети Зигмунда Фрейда): https://vk.com/institute_of_psychoanalysis Паблик ВК (Психоанализ тринадцати друзей Фрейда): http://vk.com/eeipru

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С." video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С." video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С." video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С." video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С."?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "2022.11.21 Вебинар История психоанализа в США и Великобритании Гамаюнова О.С."?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.