background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon
header logo icon

Download "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -"

input logo icon
"videoThumbnail Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Einleitung
2:31
Politische Lage
11:28
Kalter Krieg | Sowjetunion | NATO
15:03
Kubakrise
17:15
NATO Doppelbeschluss
18:10
Kriegsführung gestern
22:41
Kriegsführung heute
28:40
Stellvertreterkriege | Drohnenkriege
37:32
Seekriege | Flugzeugträger
44:45
Hyperschallraketen
46:47
Chinesische Marine
54:06
Wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen
Similar videos from our catalog
|

Similar videos from our catalog

Video tags
|

Video tags

Horst
Lüning
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:00
Today there's once again a slightly
00:00:01
longer video, a slightly
00:00:03
more difficult video and also a very
00:00:04
unpleasant video but I think it
00:00:07
has to be because our media is currently
00:00:12
driving the wild sours right now
00:00:15
and I've been
00:00:17
thinking for a long time about how to make this video
00:00:19
should be called and somewhere between the
00:00:22
democratization of war and modern
00:00:25
warfare somewhere there it has to be
00:00:27
located, it is on the one
00:00:31
hand yes but without this cynicism
00:00:33
I can't bear it because I am a
00:00:35
fundamentally peace-loving person who wants a
00:00:38
competition a peaceful
00:00:41
competitive situation for the the best ideas
00:00:44
and around the smartest minds and the
00:00:46
most economical, modern ideas
00:00:49
win and see positively in the world and
00:00:51
not see any military victory as
00:00:54
desirable, take things away from other people,
00:00:56
make other people feel bad,
00:00:59
make life difficult because that leads to
00:01:01
lower value creation worldwide,
00:01:04
that's the world We always know
00:01:07
about wars and some take
00:01:10
place in the public eye and
00:01:11
others completely in secret and you don't really notice it,
00:01:14
but there is really
00:01:16
something going on in the world and so that you
00:01:19
can hear it from me right at the beginning
00:01:21
Quote from Thomas Gast the
00:01:24
Legionnaire here link to his video channel
00:01:26
very worth seeing
00:01:28
which quote brings war is [ __ ]
00:01:31
and why can he have the knowledge or why does
00:01:33
he say so? Well he was a
00:01:35
foreign legionnaire and took part in more than a
00:01:38
dozen war missions, especially in Africa and the
00:01:41
Arab region
00:01:43
French foreign leionary German as a
00:01:45
German in the French
00:01:47
foreign leion very interesting and if you
00:01:52
want to prepare for really bad times read his book
00:01:54
Urban Survival I have it
00:01:57
lying around and I'm already pretty far
00:01:59
along in it yes strong stuff but if
00:02:03
you're a bit anxious
00:02:04
You should take a look at it
00:02:06
so that you know how you
00:02:08
can prepare and what the
00:02:10
future is for you. Power knows
00:02:13
nothing doesn't make
00:02:15
anything bad, so today it's about
00:02:19
the global situation then the current
00:02:23
warfare then the future
00:02:26
warfare and for that matter Finally, there's
00:02:28
a conclusion and that's a
00:02:30
bit long for us now, but before we get to the
00:02:32
introduction or the
00:02:34
intro, I have to say a little something
00:02:36
about our political situation at the
00:02:38
moment, which
00:02:40
is anything but good and still Before that, I have to
00:02:44
say why do I believe that
00:02:45
I am qualified to make statements here?
00:02:47
Now, as is so often the case and always insulted by my critics,
00:02:50
I
00:02:51
studied aerospace engineering and in the
00:02:53
early 80s during the Cold War
00:02:56
I was in my main course and I have I also
00:03:00
did studies in the defense industry, which was common back then during the Cold War,
00:03:02
an MBB here in Otobbrunn and
00:03:05
so I did, for example, flow calculations on
00:03:08
the Cormoran missile, which is a
00:03:11
Bundeswehr airship missile. I do
00:03:13
n't know if they still have it
00:03:15
brand new back then During the
00:03:17
unpowered flight phase, I calculated the
00:03:19
area of ​​dead water behind this missile. Yes, I
00:03:21
calculated fluid mechanics
00:03:23
at the time, which was quite modern and they
00:03:26
also had the ihbg
00:03:28
industrial plant operating company next to it,
00:03:30
which was also an armaments
00:03:33
thing that I knew not far
00:03:35
away was the
00:03:37
manager there so you can also
00:03:39
talk to people there and we were
00:03:42
also able to play with the flight simulators there.
00:03:43
They were the first
00:03:44
flight simulators where you could simulate fights
00:03:46
against each other with certain
00:03:47
flight characteristics. It was a very
00:03:50
interesting story and
00:03:52
it came to me at these points So a
00:03:53
basic knowledge that I
00:03:55
already know my way around and yes, we
00:03:58
were at the forefront of the most modern research
00:04:00
and what was part
00:04:02
of research back then is now
00:04:05
partly public and partly not yet
00:04:06
publicly in use and in operation
00:04:09
So I'm at least familiar with
00:04:11
the theory behind it in
00:04:13
detail, of course I don't know it in detail, I don't
00:04:15
have a medium clearance, I don't have any
00:04:17
insight into it and and and no, but I have
00:04:20
a very healthy half-knowledge and
00:04:22
I would like to bring that across here today for the better
00:04:25
and It's definitely enough for a strategic
00:04:27
assessment of the situation. I've been
00:04:35
asked a lot in emails in the last few days about the current threat of war. I'm relatively
00:04:38
relaxed about it because I
00:04:51
see the enemy, who is currently viewed and driven by the media, as rational and therefore predictable in the end
00:04:54
A war against NATO cannot be
00:04:57
won and we don't know that
00:05:00
any more than NATO
00:05:03
can win a war against the enemy.
00:05:06
We don't know that, so why are we doing the whole thing by
00:05:09
weakening the enemy and getting it into
00:05:12
a better strategic position and
00:05:16
weakening the enemy With his
00:05:17
means and everything,
00:05:19
I don't classify
00:05:22
our politicians rationally, whereby we're now
00:05:25
coming to criticism of our politicians.
00:05:27
I even see a lot of psychos
00:05:30
doing mischief there. Yes, there's no other way to
00:05:32
say it. Please give me a few examples from
00:05:35
the Green Party in 2021 In the
00:05:38
election campaign there were no weapons in
00:05:41
war zones, an aggressive
00:05:44
belligerent party has become where
00:05:49
war is sometimes accidentally declared on an enemy - something that doesn't work at all
00:05:52
from the ministerial group and where the
00:05:56
apocalyptic riders are circling around the
00:05:58
weapons factory
00:06:00
and, according to weapons, more weapons
00:06:02
shout more weapons, no, that's
00:06:04
very suspicious, so are the
00:06:06
Greens, no, are the other parties better?
00:06:10
Let's take a look at the CDU, so there is
00:06:13
n't much left of Christian neighborly love and
00:06:16
a CDU demands a
00:06:17
defense
00:06:20
politician, no politician that we have to take the
00:06:23
fight with our western weapons far
00:06:26
into enemy territory and into the ministries,
00:06:32
oops, I thought the statements about
00:06:36
war with an enemy from the
00:06:39
Green Party would have been a slip-up,
00:06:40
so careless and
00:06:43
without forethought, no, but at this
00:06:46
point it seems to me Now
00:06:48
things are a little more intense, so
00:06:51
pretty direct congratulations,
00:06:52
CDU CSU, you've easily lost several
00:06:55
percent of the election result in the next
00:06:57
elections. That's not possible if
00:07:00
you think you can pull the majority of the
00:07:02
population over with it. Do
00:07:05
n't believe in your media too much Here
00:07:07
you are very compliant, you can almost
00:07:10
say they support you in terms of propaganda,
00:07:13
but the liberal FDP is obviously against it.
00:07:17
Oh no, it's a complete catastrophe there too.
00:07:20
They make a weapons coat of arms
00:07:34
You have to imagine what's
00:07:36
going on, it's
00:07:38
scary, the FDP, formerly free, formerly
00:07:41
free party, no, but now comes
00:07:44
the workers' party, which, no,
00:07:47
the current non-worker's party, the SPD, which is
00:07:50
trying to achieve peace, no,
00:07:53
an SPD politician is shooting the buck
00:08:01
We put it like this: Brussels has a defense military politician who is demanding a nuclear bomb for
00:08:04
the EU so that the unelected
00:08:09
commission people there
00:08:13
can decide about it, but I think that's
00:08:15
absolutely violent and we don't have
00:08:19
nuclear weapons in the EU. France has the
00:08:23
forests for the nuclear power the
00:08:26
british ones are
00:08:28
out, the forests FRB won't
00:08:32
protect Europe, NATO won't
00:08:35
protect Europe, that Europe now suddenly
00:08:37
wants to have its own atomic bomb, what
00:08:41
's behind it, what do you want? That's the
00:08:44
really big question at this point. I
00:08:46
made a very important video here
00:08:48
Video I believe that there will be
00:08:49
war again
00:08:52
The thing has already reached 300,000 views, I looked into a bunch of
00:08:54
sources
00:08:56
and in there I
00:08:59
explained why attacking NATO states,
00:09:02
i.e. if NATO were to become self-aggressive
00:09:05
like Poland or
00:09:07
Germany would No NATO aid
00:09:10
will be given Why should Paris now with
00:09:15
its
00:09:16
nuclear power Germany or Poland who have
00:09:24
done something here? No, let's leave it out here. Why should they want to
00:09:26
protect those who risk going back to Paris?
00:09:29
Why should the USA want to do that and
00:09:31
going back to Boston? No, it wo
00:09:35
n't and you can throw a little bomb like that,
00:09:37
no, the
00:09:40
world won't end because of that and Sergei
00:09:42
a karaganov, he's a
00:09:45
military strategist and some rascal
00:09:48
from Russia said it back then
00:09:50
and I have a source 11
00:09:53
in that I have an old video of mine
00:09:58
talking about him or I linked an article by him
00:10:02
there and the man has
00:10:04
a kind of
00:10:07
ice-cold logic and strategy that runs
00:10:10
down your spine, no.
00:10:14
Conclusion interim conclusion between all
00:10:17
the parties that have been in Germany so far have been
00:10:19
in government in the past decades
00:10:21
or have
00:10:23
been in government, they are called old parties. They
00:10:26
all rattle with their sabers
00:10:29
endlessly, not necessarily the
00:10:31
front line, although in the Green Party they are also
00:10:34
the front line, but
00:10:36
let your party people have free speech here So
00:10:40
that they can turn up the heat here to
00:10:42
the point where they can't anymore and
00:10:44
really scare people and
00:10:47
you can no longer trust these parties as a
00:10:49
sensible person, so that the
00:10:51
people who are currently doing their own
00:10:54
political grave justice are
00:10:58
not the case
00:11:03
Most of them have
00:11:05
refused, they have no idea what
00:11:07
war is like, they have
00:11:10
no idea about the horrors of war, they sit there
00:11:13
in
00:11:14
their armchairs in the deep lorry carpet
00:11:17
and think they are rattling their sabers here
00:11:19
can be very difficult, so now let's get
00:11:23
to the details of the
00:11:26
dispute that may take place, stay tuned,
00:11:34
good evening and welcome to the
00:11:36
entrepreneur blog, briefly called sub-block,
00:11:38
accompany me on my path through life
00:11:39
and learn the secrets of
00:11:40
society and the economy, those
00:11:42
of politics and the media like to be kept
00:11:43
secret and I
00:11:46
grew up during the Cold War
00:11:48
and that wasn't so pleasant and the
00:11:51
goal of the Soviets at that time was
00:11:54
Russia plus the surrounding area, what were the
00:11:56
15 states that
00:12:00
had joined together to form the communist bloc,
00:12:03
um they
00:12:06
were up the way to proselytize the
00:12:09
world for socialism communism
00:12:13
so everywhere
00:12:15
in the world
00:12:17
communism was spread and wherever
00:12:21
this communism fell on fertile
00:12:23
ground there is now bitter poverty
00:12:26
up to fail states warlords
00:12:29
rule and so a few names where
00:12:31
back then The Soviets were on the move, that
00:12:34
was Somalia, Ethiopia, and Angola,
00:12:37
Cuba, so you can see what kind
00:12:39
of areas they were where they basically
00:12:42
tried it out and then when they
00:12:44
had to withdraw there, they left
00:12:47
everything completely disordered and then it went
00:12:49
there When the Soviet Union was
00:12:54
dissolved by treaty in December 1991,
00:12:57
a
00:13:00
dissolution of NATO would actually have been necessary in return -
00:13:02
the enemy was much gone and what else would
00:13:05
NATO be? We didn't need it
00:13:07
anymore, but what's the use of such
00:13:10
generals and secretaries and so on and so on? They
00:13:14
are of great use, what are
00:13:17
they supposed to do? They
00:13:19
all go into retirement and nothing can keep up and
00:13:21
an army without an enemy
00:13:24
will at least be weak and the nation
00:13:29
will then cause the whole thing to
00:13:30
dissolve and fall apart. At
00:13:33
least there is a danger like that They
00:13:35
saw the generals and also the ministers and
00:13:38
secretaries and instead of
00:13:41
dissolving NATO or shrinking it, they embarked
00:13:43
on an expansion drive.
00:13:47
They first
00:13:49
made the poor NATO fit through
00:13:52
training in various countries and then they brought them into
00:13:54
NATO and then you get them and
00:13:57
if you come into NATO then
00:13:58
you come to the EU then the
00:13:59
money blessing comes and you feel better and so and
00:14:01
so they then pulled the people in there and
00:14:03
now expanded NATO further and further
00:14:05
east, at first glance it was perfect
00:14:09
At second glance, the story isn't
00:14:11
so good because you have to take the
00:14:13
landlord into account, practically with the other
00:14:15
side. Personally, I'm in favor of
00:14:17
expanding NATO. No, under no
00:14:20
circumstances, I'm in
00:14:21
favor of shrinking it I'll
00:14:25
make a video about how I watch our defense
00:14:28
team in Germany.
00:14:30
So when a military alliance
00:14:33
expands further and further,
00:14:35
that causes concerns on the other
00:14:39
side of the border, which
00:14:41
moves further and further over and gets closer and closer together
00:14:43
until we later have a strip So where
00:14:46
it becomes dangerous in a flash, no, and
00:14:49
then at some point you can
00:14:51
expect reactions because an
00:14:55
unconditional expansion of
00:14:57
any power in the world is
00:15:00
not how the world works, no, that's
00:15:02
not how people work. Remember the
00:15:04
Cuban Missile Crisis, when the Soviet Union developed
00:15:08
short-range nuclear weapons to Cuba and from
00:15:10
Cuba to Miami is 80 km and to
00:15:14
Washington DC where the federal government is
00:15:17
located is 10 to 15 or that was 10 to
00:15:20
15 minutes flight time for these missiles
00:15:24
and that almost led to the Cuban Missile Crisis
00:15:26
to the Third World War m a little
00:15:29
Google a little bit Watch documentaries on YouTube,
00:15:30
not just one
00:15:32
but several, then you'll see
00:15:34
that the
00:15:36
matter is viewed differently, but today
00:15:39
we're setting up short-range nuclear weapons
00:15:40
on NATO's eastern border. Well, how
00:15:42
do you feel on the other
00:15:44
side? not good just as little
00:15:46
good as we felt back then and
00:15:49
from there it's 5 to 10 minutes to
00:15:53
Moscow 600 km no less no so zero
00:15:58
forethought P and
00:15:59
there as an aptic apocalyptic
00:16:03
western rider said we are the good
00:16:06
weapons weapons weapons we are the good ones
00:16:09
and unfortunately I have to
00:16:10
disagree with that today, I no longer see us
00:16:12
as the good ones, I am ashamed of our
00:16:15
politicians. Setting up nuclear weapons within 5 minutes of the
00:16:19
center of the chosen
00:16:22
enemy is an
00:16:25
incredibly
00:16:27
irresponsible provocation and leads
00:16:29
to a destabilization of the
00:16:31
world structure
00:16:34
The countries must not be allowed to have their sovereignty within their borders, they
00:16:39
must feel independent and
00:16:42
safe
00:16:43
otherwise it will be
00:16:45
dangerous in a flash and that is what some
00:16:47
people seem to be aiming for so bellicosely
00:16:55
Cuba today we measure with double
00:16:57
standards back then that was bad today that is
00:17:01
good and important yes it is if you
00:17:05
think peacefully it is not that's what it's
00:17:08
about back
00:17:10
then the media were incredibly
00:17:13
critical well let's start differently
00:17:16
Remember the NATO double decision Very
00:17:18
few of them will
00:17:19
be of the appropriate age to
00:17:21
have noticed that NATO's
00:17:22
double decision was about
00:17:25
setting up the Americans' nuclear weapons in Europe,
00:17:27
yes, and thus bringing these missiles
00:17:32
closer to the Soviet Union's range,
00:17:34
as I said, absolutely hot hot
00:17:37
Cold War back in the early 80s and
00:17:41
The peace movement came along, the Greens
00:17:44
were founded and protested
00:17:46
against it and the media was extremely
00:17:50
opposed to the whole story and
00:17:52
today the journalists are apologizing and exposing themselves
00:17:55
and celebrating that we are
00:17:59
basically rearming here and making
00:18:01
propaganda for this
00:18:03
belligerence on the part of
00:18:04
politicians - it baffles me down I
00:18:07
can't imagine it I ca
00:18:09
n't imagine Now we're coming to
00:18:11
part 2 about the earlier and then immediately
00:18:14
following the current warfare and
00:18:17
many people haven't yet noticed the latest
00:18:19
developments in our military technology
00:18:21
and think in terms of the
00:18:23
usual three
00:18:25
types of weapons: tanks, planes and
00:18:27
ships So the army, the air force and the navy
00:18:30
and these branches of arms have been
00:18:33
known and used for over 100 years and
00:18:38
that's all yesterday's news, you can
00:18:40
forget it, something like that was yesterday, today
00:18:43
is different
00:18:46
B52 bomb
00:18:50
that unloaded its bomb load on the
00:18:52
civilian population in North Vietnam
00:18:54
burned terrible images into the brain
00:18:57
and a neighbor of ours who is an
00:19:00
ex-lieutenant colonel in the US Army
00:19:03
who did two terms in Vietnam
00:19:06
was there in the artillery and also heard
00:19:08
about it
00:19:10
Another neighbor of ours tells us a little bit, Starfigh was the
00:19:12
pilot and later retrained on Tornado
00:19:15
and in the past
00:19:18
it was important to conquer air superiority like in
00:19:21
Vietnam or Afghanistan for example and
00:19:26
with this air superiority to break the enemy
00:19:28
resistance and make the enemy give up
00:19:30
to force that is the old
00:19:32
military doctrine and it worked excellently
00:19:34
against Germany in the Second World War,
00:19:36
well
00:19:37
not excellently, it took quite a few
00:19:39
years but in the end it
00:19:41
worked with an incredible
00:19:43
technocratic rearmament with a
00:19:44
material battle but also with many,
00:19:47
many deaths on both sides This
00:19:50
technological
00:19:51
confrontation, no, but
00:19:56
in the past the wars in
00:19:58
Vietnam and Afghanistan were lost for the USA.
00:20:01
The Russians
00:20:03
also lost in Afghanistan, so you can see that
00:20:05
it is no longer so easy to
00:20:08
defeat a country today if the citizens are
00:20:10
not with their
00:20:12
government Yes, it's so criss-cross that he's
00:20:15
actually revolting against the government in the country.
00:20:18
If
00:20:20
relative resistance can be organized against the
00:20:22
enemy encroaching from outside,
00:20:25
then nowadays a war
00:20:27
against a country is almost impossible to
00:20:28
win - you can destroy the country and
00:20:30
really destroy it but you ca
00:20:33
n't win at this point
00:20:36
and if we look at our Bundeswehr in
00:20:39
Afghanistan we were
00:20:42
deployed there for almost 20 years and I'm
00:20:44
now showing it here in a row then the
00:20:46
evidence is now in source 1 and there was
00:20:48
There is an
00:20:50
enket commission of the Bundestag and they
00:20:52
have certified to the governments of several
00:20:55
governments or all governments
00:20:58
that they have completely failed,
00:21:04
not only in their fight itself but
00:21:06
also in the strategy and who was
00:21:08
CDU CSU but also SPD in these governments
00:21:11
and FDP Chancellor Schröder
00:21:16
originally started the story,
00:21:19
but the ban
00:21:23
on green and red had already been broken in Kosovo in 1999, because
00:21:25
green was also included in the government
00:21:28
when all these
00:21:29
stories started, who now
00:21:32
answers that the Bundeswehr
00:21:34
was destroyed The W current speech that
00:21:36
is driven by the media
00:21:38
has never really cared about the numbers.
00:21:40
The defense budget has
00:21:43
constantly increased over the years and
00:21:45
not even too close. They just spent the money
00:21:48
on completely wrong things. That's what
00:21:50
you can say about it namely
00:21:53
for attack and not for defense
00:21:55
why do we need super expensive freight
00:21:58
planes, freshly developed that can reach any
00:22:00
point on earth on unpaved runways
00:22:05
h we defend our freedom in the
00:22:07
Hindu Kush or in Africa in Mali but
00:22:11
probably not our western
00:22:14
politicians want to expand their sphere of influence
00:22:16
like The expansion of NATO
00:22:21
shows that the Western
00:22:24
non-states are no different. What is
00:22:26
the Australian army currently doing in the Horn of
00:22:28
Africa? They are fighting against
00:22:32
the huties who somehow
00:22:34
want an iron in the fire. The soldiers
00:22:37
have double pay. I have no
00:22:40
idea and now they're coming Let's get to the current
00:22:43
situation today, the situation has
00:22:52
fundamentally changed due to the development of the most modern weapons, which were visible as concepts far away on the horizon when I was studying. In the past, there was
00:22:54
nuclear deterrence. Overkill, no, I can
00:22:56
do more damage to you than you can do to me
00:23:01
what you need and that would have
00:23:03
led to the extinction of the world and there
00:23:06
are studies that detonating between 100
00:23:08
and 200 nuclear warheads
00:23:11
are enough to permanently destroy Homos sapiens.
00:23:15
I have to get rid of the word sustainable now,
00:23:17
so the most powerful conventional bomb that was
00:23:20
detonated was just that then the
00:23:22
Americans and then the rusts say
00:23:23
we can do that too and then in 2017 we
00:23:26
detonated the father of all bombs and they
00:23:29
had an equivalent of 44 tons of TNT
00:23:34
equivalent of 44,000 kg of TNT
00:23:38
TNT piece no, so a heavy part. The
00:23:42
next bombs were the small
00:23:45
fission bombs Such as Nagasaki and Hiroshima, which
00:23:53
had and have 10 kilotons 15 kilotons 20 kilos of explosive power equivalent to TNT
00:23:56
and that is
00:24:00
10,000 tons or 10 million kilograms of
00:24:05
TNT so a huge amount and between
00:24:08
these 44 tons and 10 million tons there
00:24:10
was a huge gap between them,
00:24:13
yes which brought nuclear use into the
00:24:16
realm of global annihilation
00:24:19
and there was a lot of
00:24:21
research into it in the 80s and
00:24:23
90s and this gap
00:24:26
in between was closed, first with the
00:24:28
so-called nuclear battlefield weapons that
00:24:30
have neutron reflectors and therefore
00:24:32
require less fission material and therefore
00:24:34
smaller explosions get there and
00:24:36
then neutron weapons that mainly
00:24:38
emit radiation that or in
00:24:43
the explosion and thus the
00:24:45
biology kills the soldier but
00:24:48
the country alone leaves the
00:24:49
infrastructure standing, a very
00:24:51
perfidious weapon, scary
00:24:54
and completely new that
00:24:58
only happens in the end or that
00:25:00
A physicist from Switzerland tested it properly for the first time,
00:25:03
so I give it here
00:25:04
Sources 2 and 3 revealed that it is
00:25:09
very likely that
00:25:12
the data and the evidence clearly show that they
00:25:18
used very small mononucular spring sets to
00:25:21
destroy Nordstream 1 and 2, that is, we What we're dealing with
00:25:23
here is fusion and
00:25:26
nuclear fission, which means you have
00:25:30
heavy nuclei and split them. There's
00:25:31
a lot of
00:25:34
contamination, nuclear dirt and so
00:25:37
on, and with fusion bombs,
00:25:40
very light elements are
00:25:41
fused together, hydrogen deerium trizium
00:25:44
and so on and this creates a
00:25:47
lot of energy but little fissile material,
00:25:49
which then pollutes the environment
00:25:51
and you can
00:25:53
adjust how hard the whole thing
00:25:54
should explode, so state-of-the-art weapons
00:25:57
and the USA also
00:25:59
announced that they had made progress there,
00:26:01
so no Question
00:26:05
and these weapons have
00:26:07
become precision weapons that
00:26:09
can be used very precisely and that makes
00:26:11
them extremely dangerous because they can close the gap
00:26:14
between total destruction and the
00:26:18
excuse of shooting around
00:26:20
and produce
00:26:23
the appropriate
00:26:25
explosive effect for every military purpose without destroying the world
00:26:27
an extremely
00:26:29
dangerous weapon that is created there and
00:26:32
in my video I believe that there will be
00:26:33
war again I
00:26:36
told a lot about these weapons and
00:26:37
picked out a whole lot of sources,
00:26:39
about a dozen sources that I
00:26:41
have in there are shown here in the Video now also
00:26:43
has dozens of sources where you
00:26:46
can read about what actually happened
00:26:48
and what the probability is that
00:26:50
it actually took place.
00:26:53
How do you want to protect yourself against such
00:26:55
attacks? It's not possible. You
00:26:59
also have to fight back automatically
00:27:02
when such attacks are carried out covertly
00:27:04
But you can't officially
00:27:06
fight back, a difficult situation,
00:27:09
it's a massive destabilization
00:27:13
of the global balance, the
00:27:15
presence of these weapons, and so
00:27:18
it's no wonder that our government,
00:27:19
which knows exactly what's happening with nim 1 and 2,
00:27:22
hasn't even told parliamentarians
00:27:26
about it The secret office of the Bundestag
00:27:28
provides information about it because what is it like so that
00:27:34
the relationship with foreign
00:27:36
secret services would be compromised and
00:27:38
that would speak against the welfare of the state,
00:27:42
that is, our government
00:27:45
should control the parliamentarians, they
00:27:48
turn the wheel and decide for themselves what they
00:27:51
do and democracy is overridden at this
00:27:53
point, believe us that we are
00:27:54
doing this in your interest, no,
00:27:57
I never think so, I would like to have
00:27:59
parliamentary control for this.
00:28:01
Difficult history. In my
00:28:04
opinion, the federal government is moving
00:28:06
more and more away from the basis of our
00:28:09
Basic Law and the Scientific Service of the Federal Government has it about that
00:28:13
Bundestag
00:28:16
yes study a
00:28:19
statement and a discussion was
00:28:22
scientific service or legal
00:28:24
service al one of which
00:28:26
gave a lecture on it and I'll also give you the
00:28:29
link to this thing here something
00:28:33
I'll give it to you too, you can read it afterwards
00:28:35
very interesting, let's now move on to the
00:28:37
more conventional ones
00:28:39
proxy wars back and
00:28:41
you wage them so that in principle you don't have to
00:28:45
fight nuclear wars, the front in Ukraine has become deadlocked. It
00:28:50
was quite clear that it was already clear more than a year ago
00:28:52
that this was the case and
00:28:54
the attackers always lose 5 points in such front-line wars
00:28:56
to 7 Z a of
00:29:00
people and personnel at the beginning where it
00:29:04
started where no one believed it but no one
00:29:05
was finished, you could
00:29:07
gain land with relatively few losses and then
00:29:10
when the front
00:29:12
came to a standstill somewhere at yep or something and then
00:29:15
the people dug in
00:29:18
Advancing in any direction is
00:29:21
always associated with extremely high losses,
00:29:24
as Thomas
00:29:27
Gast the Legionnaire explains on his channel
00:29:31
and this leads to a change
00:29:35
in the war because at this
00:29:38
point you simply can't make any further progress,
00:29:40
this front is cemented and that's where they are
00:29:43
now The smallest drones
00:29:46
have become a decisive weapon and how does
00:29:48
it work? You use completely
00:29:50
stripped disposable
00:29:54
kamikaze drones both in quadcop form
00:29:57
and as fixed-
00:29:59
wing aircraft devices. I'll give you
00:30:01
the source here about the Zaher
00:30:04
lenset such an X-wing kamikaze drone which is
00:30:09
a powerful explosive device
00:30:11
can carry with you and it is armor-piercing. A
00:30:14
flight time of only 10 to 20 minutes then
00:30:17
all the stuff inside is empty.
00:30:19
Range is several tens of km in the
00:30:23
front area and apart from the
00:30:25
explosive device, a very large battery on
00:30:29
the quadcopters and the payload can
00:30:32
in principle be used by anyone hobby drone the
00:30:33
technology is available yes fly such
00:30:35
a thing yourself first person view you can see
00:30:39
everything perfect story terribly
00:30:43
perfect story
00:30:45
and how much does the stuff cost per piece only
00:30:48
a few thousand
00:30:50
dollars that's the problem and you can
00:30:53
produce it on regular lines you put
00:30:55
them in huge Number of pieces for
00:30:57
a few thousand dollars each and,
00:31:00
as I said, they can destroy entire tanks,
00:31:03
radar
00:31:04
positions, artillery positions because these parts
00:31:07
are not armored in all places,
00:31:09
while with such
00:31:12
a cannon such an
00:31:15
artillery projectile in principle always
00:31:18
shoots at the tank from the front or If
00:31:19
you shoot from the front at the position where
00:31:21
it's heavily armored
00:31:23
you can't always get through it or
00:31:25
rarely with the drone you can come from above
00:31:27
you can come from the side and
00:31:29
so and so there are chains air inlet
00:31:31
air outlet the tower at the top and so that's
00:31:35
you It doesn't destroy the thing
00:31:36
100%, but it does so to the point that it
00:31:38
becomes immobile and in this
00:31:41
front area you can't even
00:31:42
recover it because otherwise the recovery device will
00:31:45
carry out exactly the same attacks again,
00:31:48
so these drones have massively changed the way
00:31:50
war is waged there on these fronts
00:31:52
and
00:31:57
it is that this led to
00:32:01
this system or this
00:32:05
dispute coming to a standstill there
00:32:06
and these drones basically have
00:32:08
both sides no from my
00:32:10
personal point of view I don't know a
00:32:11
lot of propaganda the truth dies
00:32:14
first in war so you don't know exactly
00:32:16
But I see that the Russians with
00:32:18
their allies and their suppliers
00:32:20
have better threat warfare there,
00:32:24
officially it was said somewhere that they
00:32:27
now have the best battle-tested
00:32:29
army in the world. Now if you
00:32:31
do it for two years, you've certainly
00:32:33
learned a lot there, something like that I
00:32:34
also heard that over
00:32:37
50% of the leopard tanks that we
00:32:39
delivered would already be broken
00:32:41
in exactly this way and how do
00:32:44
these kamikaze drones find their
00:32:46
target? There are reconnaissance drones that
00:32:48
fly the patrol and they do
00:32:50
n't carry spring sets for large batteries
00:32:53
fly longer and their
00:32:56
batteries can then be put
00:32:57
back on these kamikaz drones at the base.
00:32:59
You can charge the batteries until they burst
00:33:01
because at the end
00:33:04
you don't have to pay attention to the cycles,
00:33:06
you drive a single cycle and that's it
00:33:08
and these reconnaissance drones So if you fly
00:33:11
more often, they also have expensive
00:33:13
equipment with resolution and so on on
00:33:16
board and the artillery positions
00:33:21
now have massive disadvantages at this point
00:33:23
because you can see the muzzle flash there
00:33:24
and can therefore carry out counterstrikes on this
00:33:28
immobile target, but
00:33:31
you can't penetrate it with a drone not that
00:33:33
far into enemy territory and it
00:33:36
is relatively difficult to shoot the thing
00:33:37
down very very deep
00:33:40
comparatively fast 200 300 km per
00:33:42
hour and there are relatively few
00:33:47
defense options
00:33:50
and if you want to destroy an artillery position
00:33:52
then you have to
00:33:54
use a decent rocket, for example
00:33:56
this Home system and it's not
00:33:59
the home system itself that costs, but a
00:34:01
rocket in this home system costs 1.5
00:34:04
million dollars, so with 1.5 million
00:34:06
dollars you can destroy an arena position
00:34:08
that
00:34:10
costs about the same but is much, much cheaper per single shot.
00:34:13
A shot like that costs
00:34:16
yes under $1000 a grenade like that
00:34:20
and now you need a
00:34:22
$1.5 million device to
00:34:24
take it down or if you
00:34:26
get through
00:34:27
you just need a drone for a few
00:34:28
thousand dollars so warfare has
00:34:31
changed the war on this one The
00:34:33
place is so bad it sounds cheaper
00:34:35
if you do it right
00:34:37
on Rumble rumble.com
00:34:41
such videos are published relatively often for propaganda purposes
00:34:44
and yes, every success that
00:34:47
one or the other side achieves
00:34:49
is then stated there and I would like to
00:34:52
state that military summary is called
00:34:55
The video channel here on YouTube
00:34:57
summarizes these videos and
00:35:02
shows them on a map. I think it's
00:35:06
a Google map that uses
00:35:11
which
00:35:13
blows happened in which period or at which point and where you
00:35:16
can see the front changes over time,
00:35:18
so it's a very interesting
00:35:20
channel
00:35:23
and you can see in some places, for example,
00:35:25
people suddenly
00:35:28
leaving the tank in a hurry, why now
00:35:30
because the lid is open at the top and you
00:35:32
can hear the drone, you know exactly, oh, it
00:35:34
's intended for you In a jiffy they
00:35:35
all jump out Bang, the tank is
00:35:37
a bit lucky, they
00:35:38
survived it and then find their way
00:35:40
back and can try again with the
00:35:41
next tank
00:35:43
again a few million against a few
00:35:45
thousand dollars a factor of
00:35:48
1000 Conclusion the expensive western one Military
00:35:52
that prides itself on having the best Patriot
00:35:54
missiles and having the home system
00:35:57
and having the best tanks and
00:35:59
and and they have found a cheap opponent
00:36:01
and powerful one who can stand up to them cheaply,
00:36:05
it would be
00:36:07
a strategy at that time change ne the
00:36:13
spring offensive
00:36:16
of
00:36:17
2023, which received great media attention in the journals, has shown zero success
00:36:22
ne how do you want it against this
00:36:25
defense no it doesn't work at all no on the
00:36:28
contrary it has changed because of significant
00:36:30
strategic deficiencies of incorrect weapons
00:36:33
with great losses
00:36:35
that must Now you have
00:36:37
to admit it and before that it was
00:36:40
the only one and now
00:36:44
we're pushing it back and so
00:36:45
on and so forth. What was it
00:36:48
propaganda, the journal that titled such titles like that
00:36:53
and spread these things,
00:36:54
I have to yes information
00:36:57
for the population yes to have it certified
00:37:00
that is not at all suitable for the well-being of the
00:37:02
population and for the understanding of the
00:37:04
population no that is
00:37:08
difficult information that is being published here
00:37:11
and where the press can be
00:37:14
exploited very badly
00:37:18
no currently they seem to be the front to
00:37:21
straighten out and that could be the harbinger
00:37:25
of a coming deadlock, it would be
00:37:28
hoped that the poor
00:37:31
people will now go a little bit into
00:37:35
the future and let's go
00:37:37
further and look at the
00:37:39
conflict at sea, the war
00:37:42
in the Gaza Strip in the Red Sea
00:37:45
Support for American
00:37:46
aircraft carriers has been carried out in both the Indian
00:37:48
Ocean and the Mediterranean
00:37:52
and the USA has by far
00:37:55
the
00:37:59
largest navy in the world, although
00:38:02
we have to make a caveat here, let's get to it in a moment,
00:38:03
the tonnage of the
00:38:06
Americans is 4.6 million tons
00:38:08
largest in the world what the tonnage is now
00:38:11
Archimedes a ship sinks and the
00:38:14
water it
00:38:16
displaces in tons indicates the tons of the
00:38:19
ship what is floating in the water
00:38:22
because it is in equilibrium and
00:38:24
that is the tonnage that is calculated here
00:38:28
and that have 4.6 million tons of
00:38:32
steel and stuff floating in the water or
00:38:35
4.6 million tons of water
00:38:39
they displace so that's my order of magnitude,
00:38:42
next are the Chinese with 2.4 million
00:38:44
tons so a little more than half
00:38:47
and underneath there are the Americans
00:38:49
11 Aircraft carrier one of the
00:38:51
test trips is currently doing two that are currently under
00:38:53
construction and as of 2024, six
00:38:57
more carriers are planned, what do I think of
00:38:59
that, it's complete nonsense, I'll figure it out
00:39:01
now, why are you doing
00:39:04
that anyway? Now you need aircraft carriers
00:39:06
to destabilize smaller countries
00:39:08
because they There
00:39:11
are about 80, 90 of them on an
00:39:13
aircraft carrier. They are more powerful than
00:39:18
99% of the air forces in the world.
00:39:21
An
00:39:23
aircraft carrier like that easily defeats a country.
00:39:25
At least that's the old
00:39:28
doctrine that worked that way,
00:39:30
but you have to for it Such a carrier
00:39:32
now costs over 10 billion dollars,
00:39:34
the Ford
00:39:36
cost 13 billion and the total
00:39:38
developments for this new type of carrier
00:39:40
were probably 36 billion dollars, so that's
00:39:43
quite a lot of money and what
00:39:46
weapons are there that
00:39:48
can be dangerous to these carriers? Now
00:39:50
you can't attack these things with
00:39:52
airplanes, it's not entirely clear, they
00:39:53
always have a security squadron in the
00:39:55
air and when one comes along,
00:39:57
these air survival fighters come and
00:39:59
shoot down these squadrons as if that
00:40:01
doesn't work and then this
00:40:03
carrier fleet
00:40:05
still has this carrier fleet. Yes, this carrier fleet is one
00:40:08
fleet, that means there are other ships
00:40:10
around this aircraft carrier
00:40:11
that provide defense, both
00:40:13
above water and underwater, and so
00:40:16
a carrier strike group has
00:40:18
an aircraft carrier combat group,
00:40:20
which in German means six to seven
00:40:22
supplementary ships underneath, guided
00:40:24
missile cruisers, guided missile destroyers,
00:40:26
then hunting -messenger and of course also
00:40:30
supply ships and you need them
00:40:33
because this super expensive carrier
00:40:36
has to be protected at all costs, that's why you
00:40:38
do that
00:40:40
and what was interesting is that I'll also give you
00:40:43
the source from
00:40:47
blaulicht-iv.ch because there was one
00:40:50
Maneuvers and
00:40:52
there was a read Swedish submarine
00:40:57
which
00:40:59
Sweden wasn't in NATO at the time
00:41:01
or they're already in there now. No, I do
00:41:03
n't think they
00:41:04
had borrowed it quite yet and
00:41:07
they tried to use it in a maneuver to
00:41:11
shoot down the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan and actually They would have
00:41:14
done it, that is, a cheap,
00:41:17
small, non-noisy submarine would have taken care of an
00:41:20
aircraft carrier from a Carrier
00:41:22
Strike Group, so you can see
00:41:25
how vulnerable this stuff is, but even
00:41:28
these superior weapon systems are
00:41:30
not as superior as you think they are, they are
00:41:34
vulnerably reliable vulnerable, that's what
00:41:37
I wanted to say, so protection is
00:41:39
not that easy and there is a new threat.
00:41:43
Now you immediately think of
00:41:45
ballistic missiles that you can shoot from
00:41:47
space and then onto this
00:41:48
aircraft carrier, but that's
00:41:51
not possible because the aircraft carrier is
00:41:52
mobile and so on how to determine such a
00:41:56
re-entry body, the
00:41:57
aircraft carrier will move, the
00:41:59
re-entry bodies can be controlled to a very limited extent
00:42:01
and therefore you will
00:42:03
not hit the aircraft carrier. There is a 99%
00:42:05
chance that you will miss,
00:42:06
but it is bad luck and
00:42:12
conventional rockets and cruise missiles
00:42:15
are a possibility, that is, ship
00:42:18
to ship or
00:42:20
You can
00:42:21
attack these ships by plane to ship, for example in the
00:42:25
Falkland War, the Argentines used
00:42:28
French Exos rockets to set
00:42:31
fire to the Cheffield frigate so badly
00:42:33
that it was lost and subsequently
00:42:34
sunk, so in principle you didn't have
00:42:38
the appropriate defense
00:42:41
today You can actually defend against
00:42:43
these cruise missiles and rockets with short-range defense systems, unless
00:42:47
you shoot
00:42:50
at these ships with so many missiles at the same time
00:42:52
that the defense
00:42:54
is overloaded, because these gattlings are
00:43:01
defensive devices with rotating
00:43:04
barrels because the high firing rate, the
00:43:06
high cadence, the barrels like that highly heated
00:43:09
that they would burn up immediately,
00:43:11
imagine a Lamborghini with 10,000
00:43:14
revolutions full barrel, that's what
00:43:18
the gling turns there and the shot rate
00:43:21
goes out between 1000 and 10,000 shots
00:43:23
per minute goes out there when you have to worry about the
00:43:25
monkey-like volume
00:43:27
Listen, there are videos on the
00:43:30
internet that you pull out and
00:43:33
then you try to hit these incoming rockets.
00:43:35
Range is between 2 km and 10
00:43:40
km and at a distance of 10 km the
00:43:43
hit rate is very low, but the time until
00:43:46
impact, the things
00:43:47
typically fly like 0, 8 0.9 so 300
00:43:51
m per second is difficult because
00:43:53
you have 20 seconds time, that means you
00:43:56
have to destroy the rocket within 20 seconds
00:43:58
and if
00:43:59
a second one flies at the same time you have to
00:44:01
have already destroyed it or a
00:44:02
second downward tower has to be used Destroy this missile
00:44:05
if you now
00:44:06
get four of them but only have two defense turrets
00:44:08
but it's getting tight and that's why
00:44:12
the defense capability with this
00:44:14
short-range defense is possible
00:44:16
but difficult. You only have 10 20
00:44:19
seconds to destroy the
00:44:21
incoming missile. That's why
00:44:23
aircraft carriers are of
00:44:27
these defense ships a wide
00:44:29
environment and these
00:44:32
ships also have these
00:44:33
missile defense systems on board and the more
00:44:35
expensive the ship, the more these
00:44:37
defense systems you have on board because there is so
00:44:38
much money to protect
00:44:40
and the thousands of
00:44:42
people on board with the large ships
00:44:44
No, but we now have something
00:44:47
new, the so-called
00:44:49
hypersonic missiles, and the
00:44:51
enemies declared by the West already have the things. They can travel
00:44:54
several kilometers per second.
00:44:58
The
00:45:01
defense time is reduced from 10
00:45:03
to 20 seconds to 1 to 2 to 4
00:45:06
seconds. You have to use the things
00:45:08
caught and the flies so quickly that
00:45:10
the positioning of the defensive guns has to be
00:45:13
done incredibly precisely and quickly -
00:45:15
if you see the things
00:45:18
coming or have come every second -
00:45:21
the defense is relatively weak and
00:45:26
the flies today are between Mach 5 and
00:45:28
Mach 8, i.e. five to eight times
00:45:30
Speed ​​of sound I also have
00:45:32
a source for you about
00:45:34
the n33 Zirkon from the Russians and also
00:45:40
the hypersonic missiles from the Chinese,
00:45:42
so the probability is very
00:45:44
high that they managed to do that.
00:45:46
There are now the first
00:45:48
statements from February 2024 that are brand new
00:45:52
in Kiev
00:45:54
Was able to identify the remains of hypersonic missiles
00:45:56
that were fired at Kiev
00:45:58
and of course could not be shot down by the Patriot missiles
00:46:00
because they
00:46:03
were simply too fast and this is exactly the reason why
00:46:07
the American aircraft carriers
00:46:10
from Israel moved away from the coast of Israel and from the
00:46:13
Horn of Africa
00:46:15
have retreated into deep space because Iran
00:46:20
now says they have
00:46:24
completed a hypersonic missile
00:46:26
and equipped their newest destroyer with it,
00:46:31
so it's a difficult
00:46:33
story and the
00:46:35
Americans are likely to have
00:46:37
retreated like that, but the
00:46:39
Americans' CIA is there The place
00:46:44
has given them worrying and difficult information, so now
00:46:48
we come to the Chinese Navy and
00:46:50
also the future, I already mentioned the current figures
00:46:53
earlier, they
00:46:54
had
00:46:56
a tonnage of 2.4 million
00:46:59
tons in 2022, so they have
00:47:02
caught up a lot and the Americans are firing up
00:47:05
Ms. Pelosi is leading the way with her
00:47:07
appearance in Taiwan, setting off a
00:47:09
huge fire in the direction of China
00:47:11
and in the 80s the
00:47:17
Chinese had what is called a brown water navy,
00:47:19
i.e. coastal river shipping and so on.
00:47:22
They had their navy and
00:47:23
now they have a blue one Water
00:47:25
Marine that means a deep-water
00:47:28
navy that is at home on the world's oceans
00:47:29
with bases as I
00:47:31
told you last time in dibuti, for example, or in
00:47:33
other places in the world
00:47:35
with all the Chinese ports,
00:47:38
so they have a navy that is now all over the world
00:47:39
World is at home and also
00:47:42
protects their trade routes at this point and
00:47:46
in my opinion the Chinese have
00:47:48
a better strategy. They are constantly building
00:47:50
small ships, basically on a regular basis,
00:47:53
and have been able to
00:48:00
easily halve the construction costs of their ships, so for cheap Money,
00:48:03
many, many small ships and
00:48:05
you can install hypersonic missiles on them.
00:48:07
Such a small ship with
00:48:09
the hypersonic missile is
00:48:12
extremely dangerous. You can destroy dozens of
00:48:15
these small ships, the
00:48:17
dozen plus one can bring the
00:48:18
aircraft carrier over, so it's
00:48:21
a strategy that is very sensible and
00:48:26
less so now Yes, it is aimed at a
00:48:29
preemptive attack and less at
00:48:32
expansion than at
00:48:34
defending its own waters.
00:48:40
However, if you now look at the number of Chinese
00:48:42
ships, then they have
00:48:45
more warships than the Americans,
00:48:47
as the Chinese currently have
00:48:51
370 ships and the Americans as of 2022 only
00:48:56
296 D I also give a source from the
00:48:59
People's Liberation Army Navy.
00:49:03
So in the coming years the Chinese will
00:49:07
continue to increase their number of ships and they
00:49:12
even want to reach
00:49:14
two and a half times the tonnage of the Americans by 2030,
00:49:17
that is, they want to
00:49:19
reach 10 million tons or
00:49:21
and certainly have that with small
00:49:23
ships or two
00:49:25
aircraft carriers
00:49:27
and
00:49:29
these thousands of small ones or thousands of small ones.
00:49:33
I once read something about 1300
00:49:34
small ships that they want to build,
00:49:37
that is in principle what will give the Chinese
00:49:40
dominance on the
00:49:42
world's oceans in their maneuverable
00:49:45
second-strike capability So it's a
00:49:49
difficult story and here I'll give
00:49:50
you a picture of the American
00:49:52
Department of
00:49:53
Defense and you can see this first
00:49:56
chain of islands and the second chain of islands. The
00:49:59
first chain of islands is what the
00:50:01
Americans conquered from Japan during the Second
00:50:04
World War,
00:50:07
the entire coast down to the
00:50:10
Philippines but the second chain of islands
00:50:12
is further out, they were called that by
00:50:15
the American general
00:50:17
and the Chinese will
00:50:20
certainly have them in their control by 2030 so that
00:50:25
they are not driven out of these waters
00:50:27
because there are simply too
00:50:29
many and There are so many Chinese
00:50:30
who can do so many things.
00:50:32
If they also have the
00:50:34
production leadership in the world,
00:50:35
that's the workbench of the world.
00:50:37
Then you can also build ships like
00:50:39
on an assembly line. Where do
00:50:41
the big tankers and so on come from today? That used
00:50:42
to be the case when South Korea wanted
00:50:44
the Chinese, so they
00:50:49
can build a ship and that's
00:50:52
not a great future prospect for
00:50:56
the Americans. The Americans' expansion drama
00:50:58
off the Chinese coast
00:51:00
is a natural limit
00:51:03
and if you do that anyway If you
00:51:05
press against each other there is danger in the bush, no it will be
00:51:08
difficult, a highly explosive conflict will
00:51:11
arise there, why because you are pressed so close to
00:51:14
China what your thoughts
00:51:18
about sovereignty, you can
00:51:20
find that good or bad, in any
00:51:21
case depress you no, you don't like that
00:51:27
and what is now behind why
00:51:30
it is developing like this now -
00:51:32
the costs for the weapon systems
00:51:34
and the aircraft carriers are again rising.
00:51:37
The USA has to spend 150 to 200 billion US dollars in the next few years,
00:51:43
not to forget the expenses
00:51:46
for the aircraft on these
00:51:48
carriers Easily cost 100 to 200
00:51:50
million dollars each and you can
00:51:53
say that the Western weapons systems are
00:51:55
expensive but whether a huge
00:51:58
aircraft carrier, extremely expensive with such
00:52:01
hypersonic weapons available in the
00:52:03
world, is still a sensible investment.
00:52:06
I have my doubts, but that's
00:52:09
exactly how you see it Scandals, these
00:52:13
tangible scandals surrounding the new
00:52:15
weapon systems such as the F35 that
00:52:18
Germany has now bought, which is
00:52:21
also available as a carrier aircraft because it is even more
00:52:23
expensive and they were bought by Germany at a
00:52:25
unit cost of 286 million
00:52:28
US dollars per piece, good with
00:52:32
maintenance over so will Jare and so on
00:52:33
such an identical package I think even
00:52:36
one more plane where
00:52:39
Switzerland sold it, with Switzerland
00:52:44
moving suspiciously close to the western alliance and thus leaving the horde of
00:52:48
independence and they
00:52:50
paid how much per piece instead of
00:52:52
286 million They only paid 107 6
00:52:56
million per piece, I also give it
00:52:58
here as a source. It's a
00:53:00
real scandal like our bad
00:53:04
politics throws our money out the window
00:53:07
or, alternatively, we negotiate badly with the
00:53:10
USA, although I don't
00:53:11
believe that, but because I believe
00:53:13
that I wanted that is that the money
00:53:17
ends up in these places where it
00:53:21
ends up. The fact is that today
00:53:25
any weapon system, be it a huge,
00:53:27
extremely expensive aircraft carrier or a
00:53:30
small guided missile destroyer,
00:53:32
can be destroyed with hypersonic weapons from the greatest distance,
00:53:35
so that makes these
00:53:38
weapons quite pointless for global conflict
00:53:43
as well as these
00:53:45
According to their own statements,
00:53:48
the West still has problems with its
00:53:49
hypersonic missiles, but China and
00:53:52
Russia supposedly already
00:53:53
have them and, as I said, in
00:53:56
Ukraine they have found parts
00:54:01
of aircraft that have been fired from the
00:54:04
Russian hinterland,
00:54:06
well So now we come to the
00:54:08
economic
00:54:10
effects. The West, under
00:54:12
Ronald Reagan, then President, had started an
00:54:15
economic Western arms
00:54:17
race against the
00:54:21
Soviet Union and the
00:54:25
economic power of the Americans at the time
00:54:27
allowed them to win and the
00:54:30
Soviet Union had to for these cost
00:54:33
reasons the bad economy the
00:54:36
planned economy which always leads to bad
00:54:38
returns and to bad
00:54:40
surpluses that cannot be put into weapons. In
00:54:44
199192 the Soviet Union had to give up and
00:54:48
dissolved and now the same thing in
00:54:50
green is happening the other way around with extremely expensive
00:54:54
and yet highly lethal
00:54:55
weapon systems The West's
00:54:58
defense spending is rising to such
00:54:59
exorbitant heights while the East can score points with
00:55:03
cheap drones,
00:55:05
cheap weapons against extremely expensive
00:55:08
ships here and the
00:55:10
drones, as I said, cost thousands of dollars, the
00:55:13
missiles millions, the ships 10 to
00:55:16
100 million can easily compete against these
00:55:19
much, much more expensive Western systems
00:55:23
The West has
00:55:25
come to a disadvantage here and a
00:55:29
huge problem for the USA is the
00:55:31
interest payment debt has now risen to a
00:55:34
trillion per year.
00:55:37
The USA has a trillion interest payments per year and
00:55:40
you can see the Americans like the Western arms race of the
00:55:43
Chinese put pressure on
00:55:45
the Americans to go into
00:55:47
extreme debt here and
00:55:50
payments to Ukraine
00:55:52
were stopped because of this. Congress did
00:55:54
n't approve the funds and now they have
00:55:56
in Munich at the
00:55:58
security conference,
00:56:01
we'll get to that in a moment Now that we're back
00:56:08
in our pockets again,
00:56:15
the willingness of the western
00:56:16
population here to send their sons and,
00:56:18
more recently, daughters to these wars
00:56:20
far from home is even more limited than the means. No, it does
00:56:22
n't even reach home anymore
00:56:25
Defending the country on your own
00:56:27
land, yes, but in the distance
00:56:30
then not because you
00:56:32
no longer
00:56:34
see the point in it. That is also the reason for the
00:56:36
proxy wars, why other people
00:56:38
in other countries should fight for the Western
00:56:40
block, but the
00:56:44
East is massively threatened by 900
00:56:46
US foreign bases, 181 of which are in
00:56:50
Germany. I have
00:56:53
a source here,
00:56:55
worldbeyondwar.org, and you can see
00:56:57
the US bases around the world with
00:57:00
a dynamic globe like this and you
00:57:02
can go to it and you can see
00:57:03
aerial photos of it Base and so on, we
00:57:05
can take a look at the matter, so
00:57:08
global presence is no
00:57:10
question
00:57:13
and if it's against one's own country, it
00:57:16
's easy for the government to call
00:57:19
the population up to arms
00:57:20
to
00:57:21
defend the homeland,
00:57:23
after all, it's distributed but it's worldwide
00:57:27
to go to war because of some military psychos,
00:57:30
the western families, especially
00:57:32
they mostly have a son or
00:57:34
don't even have a son, are
00:57:36
no longer in the mood to
00:57:40
give in to the authorities in principle and
00:57:43
do it
00:57:46
through the next branch of the armed forces
00:57:48
We're now only touching on it in passing,
00:57:49
namely globally operating unmanned
00:57:52
drones and of course the associated
00:57:54
satellites that control the taxes. I shot a
00:57:56
bit in the video about Niger like
00:57:59
the French
00:58:00
Niger, where one of the largest or the
00:58:03
largest African threat base of the
00:58:05
Americans in the north of nger
00:58:07
are and it's all very, very
00:58:10
expensive and we in the West have
00:58:13
massively higher cost rates
00:58:15
than the East does and so it is becoming
00:58:19
increasingly difficult for the USA and its allies to
00:58:27
raise these funds against the will of the population The USA
00:58:30
is expected to have a supplementary budget this year that will
00:58:35
exceed one trillion. 850
00:58:37
billion have already been approved in the
00:58:40
budget, but this money is ineffective
00:58:43
and poorly spent because it
00:58:44
is invested in the wrong weapon systems.
00:58:47
You have to rip off the Germans with the
00:58:48
F35 h
00:58:51
to get additional money, but there are
00:58:53
only a few billion for that, that's not
00:58:55
that much, what's on top of that, so
00:58:57
under Trump, who from today's perspective is
00:59:01
very likely to win the elections,
00:59:02
this pressure from the
00:59:06
military cauldron will be taken away somewhat
00:59:08
further center the USA
00:59:12
and isolate it from the world and
00:59:15
reduce military spending worldwide
00:59:19
because it applies to you America first and because
00:59:21
the working population is in the
00:59:23
productive business sectors
00:59:25
and not in the military, they
00:59:27
say there are also jobs from the military
00:59:29
and so on They don't produce
00:59:32
exponential growth, they just create
00:59:34
war equipment that
00:59:36
causes destruction, that pulls down GdP,
00:59:39
that pulls down the population, that has
00:59:41
no positive effects. You need a
00:59:43
military to defend the country and
00:59:46
everything that goes beyond that costs an
00:59:48
incredible amount of money and damages the
00:59:50
country No, the defense of one's own
00:59:53
wealth is important but going out
00:59:55
and wanting to be the world's servants is
00:59:57
not possible, that is very bad
00:59:59
from the point of view of the value creation of
01:00:01
the citizens' wealth, the question is,
01:00:04
will he be able to stand up to the
01:00:06
hidden administration that exists in the country
01:00:09
especially democratically dominated
01:00:11
if you look at how the
01:00:12
democratic presidents
01:00:14
started the wars here, so
01:00:16
catastrophe but you ca
01:00:19
n't exclude the republican hawks
01:00:21
who also liked to do that when
01:00:22
I
01:00:25
look at the presidents then it becomes
01:00:29
difficult for Mr. Trump
01:00:33
to resist there, he has managed to do it in the
01:00:35
past, he was
01:00:36
n't able to end a war but he hasn't
01:00:39
started a new one and he
01:00:41
at least met with the gentleman in
01:00:43
North Korea once, he
01:00:45
met with the Chinese, what's happening now? The
01:00:47
two administrations
01:00:49
cannot say at all that there is anything in the
01:00:51
way of discussions and
01:00:53
conversations, because democracy is always
01:00:56
better than war, so what you can definitely not say about
01:00:59
the two administrations is
01:01:02
that the Western states are
01:01:05
all very tight debt levels
01:01:07
have increased massively and Germany alone
01:01:11
still has a few debt reserves, as
01:01:13
you can say, and they want to
01:01:15
use them and it was just written into Germany's burden book
01:01:17
at the security conference from February
01:01:19
16 to
01:01:21
18,
01:01:23
2024 in Munich
01:01:25
that we now have significantly more
01:01:26
money We only have to spend because we have the
01:01:28
ability and because we have the money, whereby
01:01:31
our side then replied
01:01:32
that we have already exceeded the 2% expenditure
01:01:34
and we remember
01:01:36
the boom or was it a double boom from
01:01:38
our Mr. Scholz in that
01:01:41
baby language that there So 100 billion
01:01:44
should be spent and and and
01:01:47
yes it is
01:01:48
a difficult situation that we should
01:01:51
now be saddled with further burdens for military
01:01:54
expenses that
01:01:57
lead to debts that burden our future
01:01:59
generation here in the country with
01:02:01
debts and debts and debts - a
01:02:03
result of this whole story
01:02:05
is inflation because so much money
01:02:07
is being printed, the gold-backed currency could
01:02:09
n't be upgraded. There wouldn't be so much money
01:02:11
there, but only the things
01:02:14
that bring economic success, that
01:02:15
bring interest rate effects, can
01:02:18
then be financed because they can then, in
01:02:20
principle, generate this interest and
01:02:22
a military that doesn't generate any interest, let's say
01:02:25
an aggressive military that doesn't generate any interest,
01:02:28
can only be achieved with depressed money, i.e.
01:02:29
with fiat money, with the inflation of the
01:02:31
money supply and thus with the expropriation of the
01:02:34
population
01:02:40
So that this defense spending cannot
01:02:41
increase immeasurably, we in
01:02:45
Germany have managed relatively poorly.
01:02:46
I will soon be
01:02:48
making a video about the debt brake.
01:02:50
Before the political lockdowns,
01:02:52
we had interest expenses per year of
01:02:54
4 billion, that's 4,000 million.
01:02:58
Interest expenses are something, but that's something
01:03:01
Because of the political lockdowns and this
01:03:03
huge amount of money that
01:03:05
was flooded in, these interest payments have now
01:03:08
risen to over 40 billion in 2024.
01:03:12
In 4 years you have the thing or in
01:03:15
5 years you have increased the interest payment
01:03:18
tenfold, that is much, much more than
01:03:21
the productivity gain that we have now We have
01:03:23
n't achieved it, but
01:03:24
rather have decreased. We are shrinking, yes,
01:03:27
we are in recession and
01:03:29
yet we have increased the interest payments
01:03:32
on our debts
01:03:33
tenfold
01:03:39
But the government is
01:03:41
doing everything in the world to ensure that these numbers
01:03:42
increase properly.
01:03:45
Not good at all. We are about to lose the arms race
01:03:48
like in 1991 and 92, and we are about to
01:03:52
lose it for economic
01:03:54
reasons
01:03:56
I don't think that's a
01:03:59
bad thing at all because it
01:04:01
probably helps prevent war, just
01:04:04
like the
01:04:06
showdown in the Cold War didn't
01:04:08
happen back then, but after the fall of the
01:04:12
Soviet Union there was a decade of
01:04:14
prosperity in the world
01:04:17
In the states of the former Soviet Union,
01:04:20
no, things got tough at first, then
01:04:22
things went downhill, leading to the bankruptcy
01:04:25
of Russia in
01:04:27
9899 and with the 2000 election,
01:04:31
Putin came to power in the first
01:04:34
round with almost 54% of the vote
01:04:37
and you can see that these
01:04:40
stories then lead to a
01:04:43
huge political environment and
01:04:45
to completely different systems and
01:04:48
I have to make it clear to our government that
01:04:50
what they are currently doing is sawing on their
01:04:52
own branch because those who were
01:04:55
there at the time were we It's not, they wo
01:04:57
n't be now and
01:04:59
we can see how there are the first
01:05:02
election polls in the east where the
01:05:07
traffic light parties in one federal state have a high
01:05:11
probability that none of the
01:05:12
traffic light parties will even get past the 5%
01:05:14
clause Nationwide,
01:05:17
they were now saying 30% 31% for the
01:05:21
traffic light parties, so you can see that you've lost a lot
01:05:24
and the CDU is also currently on
01:05:27
the verge of being on the rise.
01:05:29
Now there's a split from the
01:05:30
Union of Values can
01:05:33
no longer get in because
01:05:36
Germany will then fall far below the 5%
01:05:38
clause and the new election law and the
01:05:40
changed
01:05:42
electoral system will mean that the CSU will no
01:05:45
longer bring the direct mandates to Berlin,
01:05:47
they will also be lost then
01:05:48
the CDU alone will also slip quite far away
01:05:52
Then the 5% from the CSU
01:05:55
is missing 6.2 I think it was the last time,
01:05:58
take it off the CD also somewhere
01:06:01
at 14 15 17% that's it then no, so it does
01:06:05
n't look so good for them
01:06:09
the world is about them
01:06:13
emerging states
01:06:14
can prosper greatly if we in the West
01:06:16
go down the drain here, then it's
01:06:19
fair. In the end, it's best for the people
01:06:22
of the world that they no
01:06:24
longer have to live with this fear of war.
01:06:27
Well, when it comes to long-term thinking, the
01:06:30
Chinese are just hugely ahead of our quarterly politicians
01:06:33
They've been
01:06:36
thinking strategically for thousands of years
01:06:37
and that should give us something to think about.
01:06:40
We should just think about it at a high
01:06:41
political level,
01:06:42
so that should be it today,
01:06:45
thank you very much for
01:06:51
watching [music].

Description:

✘ Werbung: Mein Buch Katastrophenzyklen ► https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0C2SG8JGH/ Kunden werben Tesla-Kunden ► http://ts.la/theresia5687 Mein Buch Allgemeinbildung ► https://www.amazon.de/dp/B09RFZH4W1/ - Die technischen #Entwicklungen der vergangenen Jahrzehnte haben für eine umfassende Veränderung der #Rüstungsgüter und der #Kriegsführung geführt. Es ist ein neuer #Rüstungswettlauf entstanden, den der Westen wohl nicht gewinnen kann. Ganz im Gegenteil, der Westen versinkt in Schulden für Kriegsgerät, das nicht mehr der Situation gewachsen ist. - Thomas Gast - Der Legionär ► https://www.youtube.com/@ThomasGastLegion Ich glaube, dass es wieder Krieg geben wird ► https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf-qToJSqyQ Military Summary ► https://www.youtube.com/@militarysummary Niger + Mali ► https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-ZYPH8iSG4 - Q11 (9.23) ► https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/a-difficult-but-necessary-decision/ Q1 ► https://www.nzz.ch/international/20-jahre-afghanistaneinsatz-der-bundestag-legt-seinen-zwischenbericht-vor-ld.1814667 Q2 ► https://weltwoche.ch/daily/schweizer-physiker-ist-sich-sicher-alle-daten-zur-nord-stream-explosion-weisen-auf-die-usa-als-taeter/ Q3 ► https://drive.proton.me/urls/HYVJAJ3P5W#D2jSuEOYk3nn Q4 ► https://bundestag.de/resource/blob/905740/3ac27760f6894e1fcc597137b9a08348/WD-3-085-22-pdf-data.pdf Q5 ► https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZALA_Lancet Q6 ► https://www.youtube.com/@militarysummary Q7 ► https://blaulicht-iv.ch/magazin/fachartikel/94-blaulicht-ausgabe-5-2021/446-uralttechnik-macht-u-boote-superleise Q8 ► https://www.wikiwand.com/de/SS-N-33_Zirkon Q9 ► https://futurezone.at/science/china-durchbruch-hyperschallrakete-scramjet-bor-feststoff/402336537 Q10 ► https://futurezone.at/digital-life/iran-hyperschallrakete-flugzeugtraeger-seeflugkoerper-versenken-zerstoeren-usa-nimitz-ford/402365688 Q11 ► https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Navy Q12 ► https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/ruestungsdeal-wirft-fragen-auf-warum-zahlt-die-schweiz-fuer-die-f-35-so-viel-weniger-frau-lambrecht_id_180439127.html Q13 ► https://worldbeyondwar.org/de/Wir-enth%C3%BCllen-die-Schatten-und-enth%C3%BCllen-die-Realit%C3%A4t-unserer-ausl%C3%A4ndischen-Milit%C3%A4rst%C3%BCtzpunkte-im-Jahr-2023/ Q14 ► http://www.merkur.de/wirtschaft/deutschlands-niedrige-militaerausgaben-verteidigung-nato-sicherheitskonferenz-kritik-zr-92841902.html - 0:00 Einleitung 2:31 Politische Lage 11:28 Kalter Krieg | Sowjetunion | NATO 15:03 Kubakrise 17:15 NATO Doppelbeschluss 18:10 Kriegsführung gestern 22:41 Kriegsführung heute 28:40 Stellvertreterkriege | Drohnenkriege 37:32 Seekriege | Flugzeugträger 44:45 Hyperschallraketen 46:47 Chinesische Marine 54:06 Wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Moderne Kriegsführung - Die Demokratisierung des Krieges -"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.