Download "Критика капитализма"

Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.

Previous video: Эстетика Джентльменов [The Gentlemen]Next video: Феликс Дзержинский против криминала. Как боролись первые спецслужбы СССР против бандитов?

ТОП 10 хороших фильмов для людей левых взглядов. Топ фильмов которы

ЛЕВОЕ КИНО - ТОП 10 хороших фильмов для людей левых взглядов. Топ фильмов которы

Феликс Дзержинский против криминала. Как боролись первые спецслужбы СССР против бандитов?

Феликс Дзержинский против криминала. Как боролись первые спецслужбы СССР против бандитов?

Channel: Цифровая история

Эстетика Джентльменов [The Gentlemen]

Эстетика Джентльменов [The Gentlemen]

Channel: Культпросвет

Низкий жанр - не оправдание

Низкий жанр - не оправдание

Channel: Uncle Joe & Neon Cherry

"ГРУЗИНСКАЯ МЕЧТА" / ГЕОРГИЙ ХАСАЯ

"ГРУЗИНСКАЯ МЕЧТА" / ГЕОРГИЙ ХАСАЯ

Channel: Рабкор

Гоблин и Клим Жуков - Про развитие Германии и создании немецкой промышленности

Гоблин и Клим Жуков - Про развитие Германии и создании немецкой промышленности

Channel: StalinHDTV

ЗАВЕЩАНИЕ ГОРБАЧЕВА. СССР 1991 = Россия 202..? Можем повторить?

ЗАВЕЩАНИЕ ГОРБАЧЕВА. СССР 1991 = Россия 202..? Можем повторить?

Channel: Реальная журналистика

Дмитрий Пучков про Нагорный Карабах, Украину и социализм

Дмитрий Пучков про Нагорный Карабах, Украину и социализм

Channel: Журнал Financial One

Гоблин - Про Жириновского

Гоблин - Про Жириновского

Channel: StalinHDTV

Гоблин - Капитализм против коммунизма

Гоблин - Капитализм против коммунизма

Channel: StalinHDTV

Гоблин и Клим Жуков - Про утро в США

Гоблин и Клим Жуков - Про утро в США

Channel: StalinHDTV

критика капитализма

буржуазная критика

классовая критика

критика капитализма в кино

критика капитализма в масскульте

капитализм

критика

сатира

масскульт

массовая культура

капитализм убивает

капитализм это плохо

плохой капитализм

против капитализма

антикап

антикапитализм

за социализм

социализм

коммунизм

Константин Сёмин

ФКП

фильм книга песня

культура

искусство

кино

история

политика

Гоблин

Goblin

Пучков

Сёмин

Клим Жуков

BadComedian

кинопоиск

культпросвет

00:00:01

to support the creation of new

00:00:03

educational materials on the channel

00:00:05

Use the details posted

00:00:07

in the description under the video Help

00:00:09

the dissemination of these materials by liking,

00:00:12

commenting, reposting and subscribing to the

00:00:15

channel Thank you very much and enjoy

00:00:18

watching

00:00:22

In the overall standings, at least three films are

00:00:25

parasite Joker and Les Miserables have a

00:00:27

clear social background calling for,

00:00:29

if not destruction capitalist

00:00:31

system, then at least to reconsider its

00:00:33

legitimacy as you watch it, you

00:00:35

will understand that the film is quite caustic and

00:00:37

precise social satire, ridiculing

00:00:39

very familiar aspects of the life of bourgeois

00:00:41

society, the merit of the film creators is

00:00:43

that they shook up the snickering public and

00:00:45

gave it a good kick without any

00:00:47

mysticism, without any allegories, simply in the

00:00:50

forehead if you go

00:00:55

criticism criticism discord it can

00:00:58

differ in quality topics branches

00:01:01

character method goals and objectives

00:01:04

for example aesthetic criticism logical

00:01:07

criticism factual criticism

00:01:09

destructive criticism practical

00:01:12

criticism public and private criticism

00:01:14

scientific criticism religious criticism

00:01:17

speculative criticism restaurant

00:01:19

criticism film criticism Theater criticism

00:01:22

literary and so on Among all 1500

00:01:26

shades of criticism, it is often almost

00:01:28

impossible to come across one shade,

00:01:30

the only one that is fundamentally

00:01:33

qualitatively different from all the others and

00:01:36

is of fundamental importance for us ordinary people. The

00:01:40

difference between this criticism and all others

00:01:42

lies, firstly, in the fact that it is

00:01:45

aimed at the essence of the issues under consideration

00:01:47

and not at their external manifestations and

00:01:50

secondly, that as a criterion for

00:01:52

assessing phenomena, a slightly

00:01:55

figurative formal tinsel is used, the only

00:01:58

fundamental Aspect of the life of class

00:02:00

society

00:02:07

[music],

00:02:10

regardless of the branch of the topic of character and

00:02:14

even the goals and objectives of one particular

00:02:16

critic or an entire community of critics In the

00:02:19

field of view any conditional criticism does

00:02:21

not include class interests at all. I am

00:02:24

not saying that such criticism does not exist

00:02:26

at all. Firstly, I am saying that it is almost

00:02:29

impossible to meet and secondly, as

00:02:32

a rule, what is called such criticism is

00:02:35

not it. To begin with, I will give an

00:02:38

abstract example, let’s say you came to a

00:02:40

restaurant or what’s more likely, you

00:02:43

placed an order in the dining room, paid for it and

00:02:45

brought it to you, you look at the food and

00:02:48

understand that it’s better not to eat it, to

00:02:51

make sure that your instincts have not let you

00:02:53

down, you try the food and Yes, it’s at

00:02:56

least inedible and perhaps even

00:02:59

dangerous to your health, naturally you

00:03:01

you’re not unhappy, you’re not guessing, but in the dining room

00:03:04

everyone ignores your indignation and

00:03:06

continues to work as if everything is in

00:03:08

order,

00:03:09

you didn’t need the help of a

00:03:12

professional critic to understand

00:03:14

that instead of the Tasty lunch you

00:03:16

paid for, they brought you slop, the same

00:03:20

with any other consumer goods and services,

00:03:22

but the worst thing is

00:03:25

that even if the hero of this abstraction

00:03:27

reported where necessary and as a result, a

00:03:30

seasoned critic would come to the canteen or restaurant and

00:03:31

destroy everything in his article,

00:03:33

videos or teleports in the establishment, the

00:03:36

management and even the staff would change,

00:03:38

or it would be closed altogether not by

00:03:41

these or others more

00:03:43

radical measures do not guarantee that

00:03:46

something like this will not happen again here or

00:03:49

elsewhere and B One day it will not become

00:03:51

the norm simply due to the laws of

00:03:54

economic and social development. Why Because the

00:03:57

essence of the problem, the system that gave birth to it

00:04:00

has remained untouched, now the most

00:04:03

important of the arts for us is,

00:04:05

as we know the cinema justice and

00:04:08

relevance of this thesis is confirmed by

00:04:09

the number of film reviewers, the number of their

00:04:12

subscribers and countless views on

00:04:14

their channels, someone purposefully trashes the

00:04:17

longest hack, someone

00:04:21

poses as an elitist esthete for snobs, someone

00:04:24

expertly reviews new releases, and so on and

00:04:27

so forth, one way or another they give guidelines

00:04:29

This is good And this is bad in most

00:04:33

cases these good and bad are very conditional

00:04:35

And abstract, firstly, these good and

00:04:38

bad are within the framework of a given system,

00:04:40

they are dictated and conditioned by it, therefore

00:04:43

these guidelines essentially do not

00:04:46

affect anything Therefore, secondly Whatever the

00:04:49

reviewers did not give guidelines; this does

00:04:52

not in any way affect the quality of films and the public,

00:04:54

neither in the near nor in the long term;

00:04:56

I will say more changes that are not beneficial to these

00:04:59

reviewers for a second Imagine that the

00:05:02

entire world cinema began to make

00:05:04

films no lower than 7.5 points on a

00:05:06

ten-point scale, and

00:05:09

finally, thirdly and these main ones, good and

00:05:13

bad, do not take into account class interests,

00:05:15

but in the case of political reviewers

00:05:18

[music]

00:05:21

and outside of politics, it’s

00:05:23

another matter of various political

00:05:25

tints

00:05:27

that supposedly reveal the class

00:05:30

component of films and do this

00:05:32

naturally from class positions. And of

00:05:34

course they talk about films that they

00:05:36

supposedly criticize

00:05:39

before before we continue, remember that

00:05:42

you don’t need professional,

00:05:43

highly educated, in quotes, critics on a

00:05:46

big salary who say

00:05:47

obvious things, for example about bad food,

00:05:51

clothes or furniture, in other words, you

00:05:54

can see without outside help that

00:05:57

all the bad critics are needed for someone else, and

00:06:00

everything bad is not criticism I’ll illustrate,

00:06:04

for example, someone comes to

00:06:06

VK comments or on YouTube and begins to

00:06:08

selflessly express himself in the sheets,

00:06:10

and self-expression boils down to the fact that everything

00:06:13

he saw or heard. It’s [ __ ]

00:06:16

when such a character is told that this is

00:06:19

not criticism, but his inner content and the

00:06:21

only form of

00:06:23

self-expression available to him. he replies that one must be able to

00:06:26

accept criticism of such a situation,

00:06:28

many will agree that in order to

00:06:31

crap everything, firstly, you don’t need a lot of intelligence,

00:06:34

secondly, this is not criticism, and

00:06:37

thirdly, even if we assume

00:06:39

that this is still criticism, it is useless, they

00:06:42

criticize in the same way capitalism

00:06:45

films that promote all sorts of grief

00:06:47

film experts in red what should be

00:06:49

present in the film and its

00:06:52

creators so that you can confidently

00:06:54

call the film a criticism of capitalism

00:06:57

Well, the creators It’s all simple, firstly, they

00:07:01

must properly and deeply and

00:07:03

accurately understand what and what they are talking about A

00:07:06

secondly, have the right motivation because it is

00:07:09

impossible to criticize something that you don’t

00:07:11

understand and do it sincerely if

00:07:13

you are paid by those whom you supposedly criticize

00:07:16

with films everything is a little more complicated about

00:07:19

everything in order the

00:07:26

first thing that should be in a film is

00:07:29

naturally the answer to the question What exactly is

00:07:31

bad on the one hand, because everything is

00:07:34

bad, it’s an abstraction to which they can easily

00:07:37

object and they will be right in saying that everything is

00:07:40

good, so clarification is necessary,

00:07:42

for example, Modern technology is

00:07:45

bad, no, but modern Art is

00:07:49

bad, yes, but this is again an abstraction, because it doesn’t

00:07:52

say for whom what is bad and why

00:07:56

not modern art is the root of

00:07:57

billions of people on the entire planet, in addition, for

00:07:59

some, modern art

00:08:02

brings good money, but what a bad thing, and

00:08:06

not metaphysical

00:08:11

for the whole world, the capitalist system,

00:08:14

which causes all sorts of

00:08:17

crises in all areas of

00:08:18

society and gives rise to

00:08:21

wars, keeps

00:08:23

man alive by man,

00:08:25

depletes the subsoil and kills the environment the whole

00:08:28

world leads to the impoverishment of billions of people

00:08:31

and the enrichment of a few,

00:08:33

this is the first thing that should be clear after

00:08:36

watching a film criticizing capitalism, the

00:08:39

problem is not in individual people or all of

00:08:41

humanity, not in races, religions or

00:08:44

heredity, not in high-ranking

00:08:47

officials or human nature, nor in

00:08:49

any morally corrupted people. moral

00:08:51

guidelines, technologies or something else, but

00:08:54

in the system of socio-economic

00:08:56

relations all this should be presented in an accessible way

00:08:59

with scientific justification

00:09:01

and in concrete and not abstract images,

00:09:05

wherever you throw it at every step you encounter

00:09:08

problems that humanity is quite

00:09:11

capable of solving, capitalism immediately interferes

00:09:15

[music] the

00:09:20

next point should be explained

00:09:22

why capitalism is really

00:09:24

bad so that it is crystal clear that this is

00:09:27

not an invention of communists, nor the fantasies of

00:09:30

fanatics, nor the delusion of juvenile

00:09:32

idiots, nor a myth, not a horror story and an

00:09:35

accident, but a scientifically and

00:09:39

historically proven fact many times over, which is

00:09:40

proven every day everywhere by

00:09:43

life itself, naturally by life under

00:09:46

capitalism it should be clear that this

00:09:49

concerns everyone, this is a common problem that

00:09:52

requires common coordinated conscious

00:09:55

efforts today, neither God nor the Tsar nor

00:09:59

Robocop will be able to sit out if not

00:10:02

you, then your children will definitely be covered in a copper

00:10:05

basin, a

00:10:13

film, a film or any other

00:10:15

work criticizing capitalism

00:10:17

must explain that It is not the president, nor

00:10:20

corruption, nor officials, nor ecology, nor

00:10:23

laws, nor education, nor art, nor

00:10:26

even money, nor anything else that is the

00:10:29

cause of all these troubles; all this is a

00:10:32

derivative consequence of the

00:10:34

existence of a capitalist system

00:10:36

that has outlived its usefulness and to stop

00:10:39

the suffering of people and the destruction of the planet,

00:10:42

no votes are needed banning cigarettes and

00:10:45

pornography or the death penalty for

00:10:47

corrupt officials, everything is much simpler, but also,

00:10:50

as usual, more complicated, the means of

00:10:53

production need to become public

00:10:54

property. The three points listed above

00:10:57

are just the necessary minimum; the

00:11:01

task of Social Democracy is precisely

00:11:03

to, through organizing

00:11:05

workers, propaganda and agitation among them,

00:11:08

transform their spontaneous struggle against the

00:11:10

oppressors into the struggle of the entire class into the

00:11:12

struggle of certain political parties

00:11:14

for certain political and

00:11:17

socialist ideals;

00:11:24

criticism of capitalism does not lead to a

00:11:27

clear conclusion that the system needs to be

00:11:30

changed and without options,

00:11:32

radical transformations are necessary; this is a banal

00:11:35

speculation on human suffering; it

00:11:43

should also be explained in detail what the

00:11:45

dangers of half-measures are. shortcomings and vacillations,

00:11:48

it should be extremely clear that no

00:11:51

mumiyo honey wraps or even a ton of

00:11:54

plantain will save from gangrene only

00:11:57

public ownership of the means of

00:11:59

production only the dictatorship of the

00:12:01

proletariat only communism or death

00:12:05

workers need the state only to

00:12:07

suppress the resistance of the exploiters

00:12:09

and to lead this suppression to carry

00:12:11

it out in state not only the

00:12:13

proletariat as the only one to the end The

00:12:15

revolutionary class is the only class

00:12:17

capable of uniting all the Working people and the

00:12:20

exploited in the struggle against the

00:12:21

bourgeoisie in complete displacement

00:12:25

[music]

00:12:29

Here everything is clear to explain what this means

00:12:32

and why it is not necessary to do this if the

00:12:34

work criticizing capitalism

00:12:36

has implemented all of the above points

00:12:38

fulfill this point will not be difficult.

00:12:41

Moreover, detailed guidance for

00:12:44

action is freely available.

00:12:48

Finally, as they say, if you criticize,

00:12:52

suggest or, as was said at the beginning,

00:12:54

say that everything is bad, firstly, you do

00:12:57

n’t need a lot of intelligence, and secondly, this is not criticism, or

00:13:00

at least in these words and even more so,

00:13:03

in their repetition there is neither sense nor benefit.

00:13:06

Modern technologies are quite

00:13:08

capable of showing in a film or

00:13:09

video game such communism that the fight for

00:13:12

it will begin on the day of the premiere.

00:13:15

A Marxist is only one who extends the

00:13:18

recognition of the struggle of classes to the recognition of the

00:13:20

Dictatorship of the Proletariat,

00:13:27

of course, to a certain extent, this is just me

00:13:30

subjective vision and Despite all the

00:13:33

efforts, a very generalized image of the so to

00:13:35

speak ideal films books songs

00:13:38

video games criticizing capitalism but the goal was not

00:13:42

to describe the form of the content the meaning and idea of

00:13:44

such works in full and

00:13:47

specificity was not the goal was the same

00:13:49

as with Gubanov to show that not everything is

00:13:52

criticism What they call it criticism

00:13:55

and what are the high-brow and not

00:13:58

so high-brow movie types in red presenting to us as

00:14:00

criticism and capitalism, is there at least

00:14:03

something from the list of criteria I proposed,

00:14:05

or if there is at least something

00:14:07

specific, significant and constructive,

00:14:10

now there will be a blitz review for a start in the

00:14:13

FKP section on or the greatest blogger of the

00:14:16

Russian Federation films on which

00:14:18

He dwelt in detail Oh chaparasite

00:14:21

Through the snow Les Miserables platform [ __ ]

00:14:25

love platform he rejected ten

00:14:28

abstraction moralizing and something else

00:14:30

But he praised the rest of the films with

00:14:32

all their money The question is why there are

00:14:35

any significant or at least

00:14:37

noticeable differences these films from

00:14:39

the platform No, all these films are, to one

00:14:42

degree or another, full of abstraction and

00:14:44

punishment, metaphor, and so on. The entire

00:14:47

content of these films comes down to one

00:14:49

morality or another, and plus all of the

00:14:51

above, there are no workers in these films.

00:14:55

In general, labor in these films is given

00:14:57

extreme attention little attention. The maximum that there

00:15:00

are are people who go to work or

00:15:02

return from work, or at worst

00:15:04

provide some kind of service. But even such

00:15:07

indirect manifestations are given a few

00:15:09

percent of the timing, that is, in these

00:15:12

films there is an imitation of the presence of a

00:15:14

working person so that a politically

00:15:16

illiterate viewer without a critical

00:15:18

thinking, it seemed that he saw in this

00:15:20

film a person similar to himself with

00:15:22

similar problems, only and

00:15:25

moreover, in the films so beloved by those who

00:15:27

can’t sing, director Ponzun Ho Through

00:15:30

the Snow, workers, the labor process is

00:15:32

completely absent, and in the film,

00:15:35

individualism dominates, the main character saves

00:15:38

only her a thinking pig and saving the

00:15:40

rest, even in the distant future, is

00:15:42

not even considered. Well, since the

00:15:45

circle of abstraction and moralizing

00:15:47

naturally in these films there are no answers

00:15:49

to the questions What exactly is bad Why is it

00:15:52

really bad What exactly is the

00:15:54

root of evil why it needs to be changed what and

00:15:58

how to do What is the goal Even purely

00:16:01

nominally, such questions are not

00:16:02

considered. Not to mention the

00:16:04

specifics and scientific approach. Films based on

00:16:06

John Grishin. Company Time to Kill a Client.

00:16:09

Benefactor. From the artistic and technical

00:16:12

side, these films are quite good. But the

00:16:14

main thing in them, naturally, is that they

00:16:16

criticize capitalism in one way or another; this is in

00:16:19

general, but with more Upon closer

00:16:21

examination, it will become obvious that they are

00:16:22

not criticizing the system, neither the basis nor the

00:16:25

root cause, but its consequences and derivatives,

00:16:27

for example, Time to Kill; they criticize racism,

00:16:30

that is, racism - This is bad, as

00:16:33

capitalism has nothing to do with it. America is a

00:16:34

beautiful country and it could be

00:16:36

even better if it weren’t for racism

00:16:38

benefactor I mentioned this film in the

00:16:41

series the class nature of social

00:16:43

phenomena there they criticize insurance companies

00:16:45

that are blatantly called on poor

00:16:48

ordinary people, that is, the problem, again, is

00:16:50

not capitalism, capitalism is in complete

00:16:52

order, something needs to be done with insurance

00:16:54

companies,

00:16:55

it is worth noting that in these films there is much

00:16:57

more specificity than in the films that

00:16:59

he who cannot be called

00:17:01

documentary promotes there is such a famous

00:17:03

documentary director Michael Moore, he is not

00:17:06

only famous but also authoritative.

00:17:07

You may have heard about his films

00:17:09

such as healthcare Fahrenheit 911

00:17:13

bowling for Columbine capitalism

00:17:16

Love story all these films not only widely

00:17:18

known but also highly appreciated in the

00:17:20

professional community the film

00:17:21

healthcare in 2007 was nominated

00:17:25

for an Oscar Fahrenheit 911 in 2004 received

00:17:29

two Prizaran film festivals bowling

00:17:31

for Columbine in 2002 received an Oscar

00:17:34

Cesar palm branch and loved ones at the

00:17:37

festival in San Sebastian and capitalism

00:17:39

Love Story in 2009 was awarded two

00:17:42

Venetian lions, I haven’t watched these films,

00:17:45

but firstly, this is what is written on

00:17:48

Miley on Wikipedia, an American

00:17:50

documentary director working

00:17:53

and political satire in a similar way,

00:17:56

the Leader of the Pocket Group characterizes the

00:17:58

South Korean director who directed his

00:18:00

favorite films, and secondly, the description of the

00:18:03

film capitalism Love story This

00:18:06

love story ended loudly

00:18:07

divorce, the film explores the root causes of the

00:18:10

global financial crisis,

00:18:12

talks about the manipulation of

00:18:14

American taxpayers' money, exposes

00:18:17

banks and corporations, top managers and

00:18:19

politicians who, according to the

00:18:21

director, committed the biggest robbery in the history of

00:18:23

their country, for me and recording this

00:18:26

film, it is obvious that the next first film is

00:18:28

not about capitalism, the second is in the

00:18:31

spotlight USA, it turns out that capitalism is

00:18:34

only in America. And in the rest of

00:18:36

the world, something else is that this film was

00:18:38

not even nominated for an Oscar. In my

00:18:41

opinion, it’s a good sign, maybe there is at least

00:18:43

something of substance, that’s why it didn’t

00:18:45

receive the main cinema award of its

00:18:47

country and that’s all all these films are

00:18:50

in one way or another more or less

00:18:51

connected with the life of his country under

00:18:54

capitalism, and if his films

00:18:57

posed at least some real

00:18:59

threat to the existing order of things in the United States,

00:19:02

Michael Moore would have faced the fate of Edward

00:19:05

Snowden or Julian Assange In the overall

00:19:07

standings, the minimum three films the parasite Joker

00:19:10

and the outcast have a clear social

00:19:12

background they call, if not for the word

00:19:15

capitalist system, then at least for a

00:19:16

revision of its legitimacy

00:19:19

science fiction Many believe that

00:19:22

films such as Alien Blade Runner

00:19:25

Avatar Time RoboCop Aliens Among Us

00:19:29

criticize capitalism, well Yes, they

00:19:32

even criticize capitalism in the metaphors and

00:19:35

allegories of Blade Runner,

00:19:37

you can easily see capitalism

00:19:39

and not from the best side, but how

00:19:42

is it that for generations

00:19:44

such criticism of capitalism has been regularly delivered,

00:19:47

but not only is it not prohibited,

00:19:49

it is not opposed at all,

00:19:52

moreover, this criticism of capitalism breaks

00:19:55

records for box office receipts And most importantly,

00:19:57

firstly, capitalism is as it was and is

00:19:59

not going to go away, and secondly,

00:20:02

despite the most vivid images of

00:20:04

those who have seen the light among the audience, there are no

00:20:07

spectators and reviewers focusing

00:20:10

on how these films were made, a

00:20:17

little less thought than no one

00:20:19

Who specifically criticizes alien

00:20:21

soullessness of corporations Blade Runner is

00:20:24

about the same thing Avatar destruction of

00:20:27

ecology bad people destroyed their

00:20:30

planet they came to destroy another people

00:20:33

that is, the problem is in humanity time is

00:20:36

perhaps the most transparent and accurate

00:20:38

allusion to life under capitalism Well, none

00:20:41

of the proposed ones is raised in it

00:20:43

I have questions in RoboCop, the

00:20:45

main character is generally a policeman, that is,

00:20:48

the Guardian of the security of corporations. This is

00:20:50

definitely a criticism of capitalism. Are you sure? Well, the

00:20:53

rest before I sat down to write this

00:20:55

script. I tried to look for different

00:20:57

lists of a crowd of films criticizing

00:20:59

capitalism; there were a lot of them, and the

00:21:02

content of these lists made me

00:21:04

despondent. those who compiled them don’t seem to even

00:21:06

roughly understand what

00:21:08

capitalism is and how it should be criticized. A

00:21:09

few of the proposed films I didn’t

00:21:11

see. The main part of the lists overlapped in many ways.

00:21:14

What films did I

00:21:15

come across there? Toy Business people Joker

00:21:18

fighters somehow social got into these lists

00:21:21

network citizen Kane

00:21:24

new times some idiot added a new order to

00:21:27

one of the lists of films criticizing

00:21:28

capitalism and finally

00:21:31

wall street and the wolf of wall street toy I

00:21:34

only watched it as a child I didn’t really

00:21:36

like it, but the guy’s toys were

00:21:38

cool Yes, many they say that the criticism of

00:21:40

capitalism there is really successful, a

00:21:42

very funny, perky comedy that

00:21:45

at the same time touches on the most

00:21:46

social issues, take off your clothes, go

00:21:55

around the editorial office, we’ll see

00:21:58

if it will entertain the employees, I won’t argue, I’ll

00:22:01

just say that if you’re going to

00:22:03

watch it, keep on hand the list of

00:22:05

questions I suggested Business people,

00:22:07

an adaptation of the work About Henry in For

00:22:10

some reason he was listed on the list as Bolivar ca

00:22:12

n’t stand two. I remember this

00:22:14

film adaptation very well. But where is the criticism of

00:22:16

capitalism? It’s just naked

00:22:18

moralizing; all that specifically this

00:22:20

short story about Bolivar suggests is to

00:22:22

think about how bad capitalism is.

00:22:24

Well, you thought and went on with

00:22:27

your business. capitalism in general and

00:22:29

capitalists in particular continue to

00:22:30

flourish such films should not be

00:22:33

dangerous Marxist

00:22:36

not Sobchak simultaneously shows

00:22:39

what kind of audience she was counting on and

00:22:41

how well she knows Marxism Vera,

00:22:43

for obvious reasons, Marxism is a little

00:22:45

less than nothing, just like in all

00:22:47

other films supposedly criticizing

00:22:49

capitalism that the bourgeoisie supplies

00:22:51

are indirect indicators, hooks that

00:22:54

catch the attention of the average viewer

00:22:56

so that it seems to him that in this film he

00:22:59

sees himself, he sees his problems. But

00:23:02

firstly, in the Joker there are no workers, there are

00:23:05

conversations about different workers, but there are no workers in the frame

00:23:08

and the Joker has no problems

00:23:11

specific capitalism And firstly with

00:23:13

the head and secondly with the manifestations of

00:23:15

capitalism Joker capitalism does not float at all

00:23:18

Fight Club is another film

00:23:21

that criticizes the manifestations of capitalism

00:23:23

Yes Tyler proposes to break the system But

00:23:26

what does he propose in return in the first

00:23:28

episode of the series What Dreams May Come the

00:23:29

progenitor of the concept he promotes is mentioned

00:23:31

Tylerdan, it is to a

00:23:34

certain extent consonant with the one

00:23:35

that Cameron moves in Avatar, roughly

00:23:38

speaking, go back to the Stone Age, but for

00:23:40

this they need to destroy information about loans.

00:23:42

And to press the red button that the

00:23:45

social network was on this list, I ca

00:23:46

n’t imagine where there is

00:23:48

criticism of capitalism, citizen criticism of

00:23:51

capitalism new times, approved by Bergman, is

00:23:54

perhaps the film among all those

00:23:56

considered that really shows a

00:23:58

working man, a film that owes its

00:24:00

appearance to the Great Depression in any

00:24:03

other time, a similar film under

00:24:05

capitalism would never have appeared, this is a

00:24:07

wonderful film and it is perhaps the

00:24:09

closest to a criticism of the system and not its

00:24:12

manifestations and after all, this is criticism for the sake of

00:24:15

criticism, it is of high quality, skillful, accurate,

00:24:18

perhaps of all the films reviewed,

00:24:20

this is really the best criticism, this

00:24:22

film is closest to the example of what a

00:24:25

critique of capitalism should be, again,

00:24:27

of the films reviewed, but firstly,

00:24:30

this film also lacks a lot, and

00:24:32

secondly secondly, as I said above,

00:24:33

this film owes its appearance to the Great

00:24:36

Depression and at the same time to the active

00:24:38

conscious construction of socialism in the

00:24:40

Soviet Union to the strong labor

00:24:41

movement around the world, the trade union

00:24:43

socialist and communist

00:24:45

association in the USA Do

00:24:48

n’t you understand

00:24:51

that we live like Pigs and die like

00:24:55

Pigs only because we are nobody to each other

00:24:58

[music] the

00:24:59

factory and Yuri Bykov's fool these films

00:25:03

were not on the lists, I added them on my own

00:25:05

a few years ago, my comrades and I

00:25:07

released two reviews of the factory, basically there

00:25:09

were their thoughts after the years,

00:25:12

for me personally it is obvious that Bykov even does

00:25:14

n’t think of criticizing capitalism in his

00:25:17

films, there’s nothing

00:25:18

constructive at all, all Chernukha, everything is

00:25:21

bad, just like the guy in the red shirt,

00:25:23

and even in the film the factory workers

00:25:26

are present, purely nominally a new

00:25:29

order, when I saw this film in the

00:25:31

list of films criticizing capitalism, I could

00:25:33

n’t believe my eyes, because there’s a new order this is a

00:25:36

film in which capitalism is replaced by

00:25:38

fascism, good criticism of Wall Street,

00:25:42

all Stone’s films indicate that he is a

00:25:45

complete idealist, just like the films of

00:25:47

Michael Moore, Stone’s films criticize the

00:25:49

manifestations of the product of capitalism, but not

00:25:52

capitalism itself, not the system nor its

00:25:54

foundation, the wolf of wall street with

00:25:57

artistic On the technical side, the film is

00:25:58

excellent

00:25:59

as far as criticism of capitalism Yes, Scorsese at

00:26:03

least declared that with this

00:26:04

film he criticizes capitalism, but

00:26:06

the criticism turned out to be so enchanting

00:26:08

that a significant part of the audience, if not the

00:26:11

majority, saw in this film exactly the

00:26:13

opposite Ode to capitalism. But even if you

00:26:16

forget about this fact, Scorsese’s criticism of capitalism

00:26:18

it turned out to be about the same

00:26:20

as Chuck Palahniuk's criticism of capitalism. That

00:26:22

is, no one saw what exactly the

00:26:25

problem was after fight club, fight clubs

00:26:27

began to arise all over the world

00:26:29

where guys simply

00:26:31

mauled each other, a rather peculiar

00:26:33

fight against capitalism. And after the Wolf of

00:26:35

Wall Street, capitalism did not exist at all looks like

00:26:37

a problem. Perhaps this is it, the final

00:26:40

question is why those who tell you

00:26:43

about the class struggle about class

00:26:44

interests who quote Lenin and in words at

00:26:47

least wholeheartedly for the dictatorship

00:26:50

of the proletariat

00:26:51

praise the criticism of capitalism

00:26:53

approved if

00:26:56

you want to help want to study theory,

00:26:59

sign up for the Marxist

00:27:02

Leninist organizations circle Don’t waste time

00:27:04

wasting acting alone the power of the

00:27:07

working class organization without

00:27:09

organization

00:27:19

[music]

00:27:36

[music]

Description:

Критика критике - рознь. Она может отличаться по качеству, темам, отраслям, характеру, методам, целям и задачам. Но среди всех 100500 оттенков критики, чаще всего почти невозможно встретить один оттенок. Единственный, который фундаментально качественно отличается от всех прочих и для нас (простых людей) имеет принципиально-важное значение. СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ, КОТОРЫЕ ВАС УДИВЯТ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVDx7uETb78&t=74s ЛЕВОЕ КИНО - ТОП 10 хороших фильмов для людей левых взглядов. Топ фильмов которы https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCoyM-3EcCk&t=1077s Поддержать регулярный выход новых материалов Сбербанк (Елена) - 2202*2002*8985*4364 Яндекс деньги - 4100*1182*1968*114 Boosty - https://boosty.to/kultprosvet +7 913 180 95 82

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Критика капитализма" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Критика капитализма" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Критика капитализма" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Критика капитализма" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Критика капитализма"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Критика капитализма"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.