background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи"

input logo icon
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

1:23
Презумпция невиновности. Водитель является невиновным пока его вина не будет доказана.
2:43
Неустранимые сомнения виновности лица, привлекаемого к ответственности толкуются в пользу этого лица.
3:40
Водитель не обязан доказывать свою невиновность.
5:55
Чем протоколе и отличается от постановления?
7:06
Что писать в протоколе?
9:17
Инспектор говорит, что есть доказательства вашей вины, но не показывает
9:44
Что можно писать в протоколе?
10:27
Кем могут выступать свидетели?
11:21
Что такое "ходатайство" и почему это самое мощное оружие в руках водителя?
14:50
Не знаете русский язык как родной? И для вас есть лайфхак
15:53
Никогда не подписываете протокол не глядя!
Video tags
|

Video tags

что писать в протоколе
что писать в протоколе дпс
гибдд
протокол дпс
дпс
пдд
протокол правила
протокол
правила дорожного движения
подписывать протокол
подписать протокол
протокол гибдд
инспектор гибдд
должен ли инспектор гибдд
шумский
александр шумский
александр шумский пробок нет
пробок нет
александршумский
что_писать_в_протоколе_дпс
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:02
traffic cop stopped you and wants to issue
00:00:04
a report or even a decree immediately
00:00:06
with a fine, what to write in these
00:00:08
documents, is it worth refusing to
00:00:10
sign if you don’t agree with the accusation and
00:00:12
what rights do you have that the traffic cop will
00:00:14
never tell you, look in
00:00:16
today’s episode, break the template
00:00:19
immediately like and subscribe to the channel
00:00:20
if you haven’t already, jokes with you,
00:00:23
let’s go,
00:00:26
we analyze a lot of traffic situations
00:00:30
so that you don’t violate and don’t get into them,
00:00:32
but this does not mean that the traffic police inspector
00:00:34
will not have complaints against you, he may
00:00:36
consider that a violation has taken place and
00:00:38
try to punish you for this, maybe he doesn’t
00:00:41
know the law well, so he
00:00:43
misinterpreted your actions as a
00:00:45
violation, or he could be making a mistake in good faith, it
00:00:47
also happens that the sun was blinding
00:00:50
or he turned away, he didn’t fully see
00:00:51
your trajectory, and at
00:00:54
worst, you’re driving a BMW, so he
00:00:56
knows exactly what you are a violator, but even if you
00:00:58
really violated something, this does not mean
00:01:00
that you have no rights, you can do
00:01:02
whatever you want, your guilt must be proven
00:01:04
offense, responsibilities are different, they are not
00:01:06
always deprivation of rights, sometimes only a
00:01:08
small fine, in any case, you
00:01:10
have the right to an objective fair
00:01:11
consideration of the case, so today
00:01:14
we’ll talk about how to behave when
00:01:16
considering an administrative case, what to
00:01:18
write in the protocol and what
00:01:20
should not be written there. The first thing that every
00:01:22
driver, pedestrian, cyclist or any
00:01:24
other traffic participant should know is the presumption
00:01:27
of innocence, a familiar term, truth,
00:01:29
the principle applies even to violations
00:01:31
identified with the help of cameras, many lawyers,
00:01:33
traffic cops, by the way, do not realize this at all,
00:01:36
why are you trying to argue back to them,
00:01:38
and so this means the presumption of
00:01:40
innocence 1 driver or other part of the
00:01:43
non-movement is innocent until his
00:01:45
guilt is proven, a
00:01:47
ruling on this has entered into force if you are
00:01:49
challenging a court ruling or
00:01:51
traffic cop, then you are not obliged to pay a fine
00:01:53
until the resolution comes
00:01:55
into force after drawing up the
00:01:57
documents, you are given ten days to
00:01:59
decide whether you will appeal or not, if
00:02:02
you go to appeal, then all this time you are
00:02:04
not guilty until there is a decision on
00:02:06
your complaint. may be useful if the
00:02:08
violation is repeated, for example, you
00:02:11
dispute the charge of driving through a
00:02:13
red light, and at the same time, in the second
00:02:16
protocol, he writes out for a similar
00:02:18
violation, since the first resolution has
00:02:19
not yet entered into force, there is no
00:02:22
repetition of speech; you are not
00:02:24
guilty there, accordingly, and there is no repetition
00:02:26
this means you can only be fined
00:02:28
1,000 rubles, and if the first
00:02:30
resolution had time to come into force, you would have been
00:02:32
threatened with 5,000 rubles or deprivation of
00:02:34
rights from 4 to 6 months. By the way, even
00:02:37
the decision that has entered into force can
00:02:39
continue to be challenged in the higher authorities,
00:02:41
but this is a separate conversation.
00:02:43
about the presumption of innocence, irremovable
00:02:45
doubts about the guilt of the person brought
00:02:47
to justice are interpreted in favor of
00:02:49
this person;
00:02:50
doubts are considered irremovable when the
00:02:53
evidence does not allow one to come to an
00:02:54
unambiguous conclusion about the guilt of the person and
00:02:57
legal methods of collecting evidence have
00:02:59
been exhausted; the basis of the decision should
00:03:01
not be the assumption that you
00:03:04
have violated something and it is an established fact, therefore,
00:03:06
if the video recording shows that you are driving
00:03:09
next to a double continuous line, but whether
00:03:11
they crossed it or didn’t cross it, the recording
00:03:13
was made from a distance, they are clear and such
00:03:16
evidence is unacceptable and cannot
00:03:18
be turned against you, but another
00:03:19
small example is an ineradicable
00:03:21
doubt, I will of course consider a fine for
00:03:23
speeding by 191 k meters,
00:03:26
which we wrote to a motorist in
00:03:27
St. Petersburg, despite the fact that the car
00:03:29
was obviously stuck in a traffic jam, such a
00:03:31
resolution photo to it raises
00:03:33
doubts in the Republic of Belarus regarding the ability of the
00:03:35
complex to record violations, these
00:03:37
doubts should be interpreted clearly
00:03:38
by user 3 regarding the presumption of
00:03:41
innocence but most importantly, the driver is not
00:03:43
obliged to prove his innocence, you do
00:03:45
not have to collect facts, photographs,
00:03:47
witness testimony, take a recording
00:03:49
from your video recorder to prove
00:03:52
your innocence,
00:03:53
this is the task of the traffic police authorities, they must
00:03:56
collect enough
00:03:57
evidence to clearly
00:03:59
understand your guilt, however, here
00:04:03
the law makes a reservation that this third
00:04:05
the clause about the absence of the obligation
00:04:06
to prove innocence does not
00:04:08
apply to violations;
00:04:10
photographic cameras have been identified as working in
00:04:13
automatic mode, but all other
00:04:15
principles of the presumption of innocence
00:04:17
apply even when recording
00:04:20
violations automatically; in this case, the
00:04:21
presumption of correct operation of the camera applies
00:04:23
because the photo complex has passed the
00:04:24
appropriate verification and received a
00:04:26
certificate of validity as a measuring device
00:04:28
the device and the law trust it a priori if
00:04:32
you do not agree with the photo data then you
00:04:34
need to prove it, it’s not difficult to do
00:04:37
when we issued you a fine for your Daewoo
00:04:39
Nexia, in fact you have a truck man,
00:04:41
such a case recently happened in the Tula
00:04:44
region with our subscribers, the camera
00:04:45
was read incorrectly the letter s and well, and
00:04:48
accordingly,
00:04:49
everything is visible on the resolution and is canceled quite easily,
00:04:51
or for example, our subscribers Yulia received
00:04:54
a fine for the fact that her smart turned out of a
00:04:56
lane prohibited for this maneuver,
00:04:58
but the camera mixed up the trajectories of the
00:05:00
smart and the BMW again, you would
00:05:03
not have issued a fine that car does
00:05:07
n’t even need to collect such evidence of innocence, it’s just
00:05:09
obvious they already exist, it’s another matter
00:05:11
when some important element was not captured in the camera lens, a
00:05:14
sign of a pit that
00:05:16
caused this violation, you
00:05:19
had to offend her and you will need to
00:05:21
collect this evidence
00:05:22
on your own, the best For this purpose, the
00:05:24
video recorder tool is now,
00:05:27
by the way, we, together with the competent
00:05:28
authorities, are checking information about an
00:05:30
erroneous fine for our subscriber
00:05:32
who arrived for speeding,
00:05:34
but the recorder clearly shows how he was
00:05:36
driving strictly according to the signs, but the cars
00:05:38
that overtook him were clearly violating it, but
00:05:41
perhaps it was the fine we escaped with
00:05:43
this camera has passed the appropriate
00:05:45
verification, obviously in our region, but the
00:05:47
documents are a document,
00:05:48
even obvious things have to be disputed, but
00:05:50
let's return to the main topic of what to
00:05:52
write in the protocol and how it differs
00:05:54
in general from a resolution; a protocol on an
00:05:56
administrative offense
00:05:58
is a procedural document where the
00:05:59
facts about the unlawful
00:06:01
act of a person are recorded in respect of whom
00:06:03
the case has been initiated, a
00:06:05
specific charge is formulated against this person, that is,
00:06:08
in a sense, it is a preliminary
00:06:10
document that only recorded
00:06:12
something bad, but it
00:06:14
will be considered later, for example, at a debriefing group
00:06:16
where all parties are called or in court in a
00:06:18
political article because rights are being
00:06:20
deprived In our country, only the courts,
00:06:22
traffic police officers can only issue a fine, but a
00:06:25
decree is a document that already
00:06:27
prescribes to the driver specifically for
00:06:29
not violating traffic rules,
00:06:31
it can be issued either by
00:06:33
traffic police officers for a minor
00:06:35
violation on the spot or in a review group,
00:06:37
or by a court for a serious offense if on
00:06:40
the road you were caught for driving into oncoming traffic,
00:06:42
then on the spot they will only draw up a protocol and a
00:06:44
diagram of the violation and send it to the court where the
00:06:46
case will be considered on the merits,
00:06:48
therefore it is so important that the protocol is
00:06:51
drawn up exclusively correctly and
00:06:54
objectively and the document reflects
00:06:56
not only the position of the traffic police officer but also
00:06:59
yours However, in the resolution, everything
00:07:01
must also be objective so that you can
00:07:02
later appeal and challenge it, and so the
00:07:05
protocol on an administrative offense indicates the date and place of
00:07:08
its preparation, the
00:07:09
position and surname of the person who
00:07:12
compiled it, information about the person against
00:07:14
whom, in this case, the driver, a
00:07:16
case has been initiated, necessarily availability, the
00:07:19
given surnames, names, addresses of
00:07:21
witnesses and victims, if
00:07:24
any, as well as the place and time of the event of
00:07:27
the offense that took place when
00:07:29
drawing up the protocol on the
00:07:30
administrative offense, the
00:07:31
rights and obligations of the accused are explained,
00:07:34
usually of course no one
00:07:36
does this, it does not explain, but only upon
00:07:38
signature they give a tick to sign and
00:07:40
if anything, well, read on the
00:07:42
back where people print whine to the
00:07:44
valve, it says very formally
00:07:46
small and can’t be seen in the dark and you have the
00:07:48
right to an explanation of these rules, they are
00:07:51
stupid reading about your rights a little
00:07:53
further on, of course, I’ll also say that the driver
00:07:54
is given the
00:07:56
opportunity to familiarize himself without fail with the protocol, you
00:07:58
have the right to provide an explanation of the comments
00:08:00
on its contents, which are also
00:08:02
attached to the protocol; copies
00:08:03
must be given to the driver, and here
00:08:05
the trick is often noticed; the
00:08:07
inspector asks you to sign all
00:08:09
the points; you sign that you received a
00:08:11
copy; there is
00:08:15
no copy left for you and you have already signed
00:08:17
the idea and then get knocked up at the traffic police,
00:08:20
so I always do this, first
00:08:22
I get a copy then I sign for this,
00:08:24
it causes the wildest indignation among the
00:08:27
traffic cops, they are nervous, they are boiling, but
00:08:29
where will they go? I act according to the law in the
00:08:31
protocol it is written in the column I received a copy
00:08:34
but I haven’t received it yet, when I get it then
00:08:36
I’ll sign and the inspector can’t
00:08:39
do anything because even if you call a pony who are you,
00:08:41
they’ll only confirm that he’s saving up and it didn’t
00:08:42
work out By the way, be sure to subscribe
00:08:45
to my telegram channel there’s even more
00:08:47
useful information examples of appealing
00:08:49
illegal fines and life hacks and
00:08:51
many more, the main ones are hotly
00:08:53
discussed in the comments, so you
00:08:56
have many rights that
00:08:58
the inspector will not tell you about, but because it is not
00:09:00
in their interests,
00:09:01
the driver has the right to get acquainted with all
00:09:03
the materials of the case, give explanations,
00:09:05
present evidence, file
00:09:08
petitions and challenges, use
00:09:10
legal assistance defense attorney as well as
00:09:12
other procedural rights that
00:09:14
are provided by the code sounds dry,
00:09:16
let's look at the first, the driver can
00:09:19
get acquainted with all the materials of the case,
00:09:20
for example, the inspector says that he allegedly
00:09:22
filmed your driving into the oncoming lane
00:09:24
through a continuous road, he filmed it perfectly, show me, you
00:09:27
have the right to get acquainted with all
00:09:29
the materials, so let's record if does
00:09:31
not allow you to get acquainted, there will then be a reason
00:09:33
to exclude this evidence from the
00:09:34
case file, either but it is there and you
00:09:36
can get acquainted, or it
00:09:38
should not be there, the main thing is to record in the
00:09:40
protocol that they give you a recording, I will now
00:09:42
tell you how this is done, the second
00:09:43
driver can give an explanation, this
00:09:46
means that you can write what you
00:09:48
want and to the extent you want,
00:09:50
usually there is very little space in the protocol and not
00:09:52
everything fits, you can ask the inspector for a
00:09:54
separate form, and if he doesn’t give it and
00:09:56
it happens like this is not a printing house, you
00:09:58
can take your piece of paper and write us an
00:10:01
explanation, give it to the inspector, the main thing is
00:10:03
will make an entry in the protocol that
00:10:05
one or more
00:10:07
sheets of paper are attached to it, on which you have given an
00:10:08
additional explanation, then these sheets will
00:10:10
no longer be lost if I get lost, this is
00:10:12
a reason to recognize the protocol as not valid;
00:10:14
by the way, immediately write down as witnesses everyone
00:10:16
who is next to you and can give important
00:10:18
explanations if this is not the case will do it later
00:10:20
in court, it will be necessary to prove that these
00:10:21
people were even there and there
00:10:24
will be less trust in him, so it’s better to immediately
00:10:25
record as witnesses
00:10:28
passing drivers,
00:10:30
passers-by and even your relatives,
00:10:32
the myth came from somewhere that relatives cannot
00:10:34
be witnesses, this is not so can the third
00:10:37
provide
00:10:38
evidence evidence
00:10:40
is any factual data that
00:10:42
can establish the truth, for example, a recording
00:10:44
already from your registrar or a recording from a
00:10:46
camera in our store,
00:10:49
photographs taken on the spot or
00:10:51
documents about the layout of road
00:10:52
signs would also be suitable if they could get it 4
00:10:55
submit petitions and challenges from here This is a
00:10:57
reasoned statement about the impossibility of
00:10:59
considering the case by a judge or an inspector,
00:11:01
well because he is your
00:11:03
relative, which is unlikely of course, or
00:11:05
interested in a specific solution
00:11:06
to the case, or this inspector has already
00:11:09
stopped you, you
00:11:11
have written a complaint against him to the authorities who are still
00:11:13
being considered and you think that in this
00:11:15
way he may be emotional and
00:11:17
will not be able to objectively consider your case;
00:11:19
well, my most favorite and important
00:11:21
petition is a petition for any
00:11:23
legally significant action; the petition
00:11:26
must be submitted in writing and
00:11:27
subject to immediate consideration by a
00:11:29
judge or official who
00:11:31
considers the case; in case of refusal of the
00:11:33
petition, a
00:11:34
written petition must be submitted determination of ignoring a
00:11:37
petition or not responding to it is a serious
00:11:39
violation that can lead to the
00:11:40
termination of administrative
00:11:42
proceedings and the cancellation of both the protocol and the
00:11:44
resolution, respectively, this is the most
00:11:46
powerful tool in your hands, take
00:11:48
the protocol and right there state the
00:11:50
petition you need, you have the right to
00:11:52
petition for the involvement of a defense lawyer,
00:11:54
that is, a person possessing special
00:11:55
legal knowledge and this petition
00:11:58
must be satisfied
00:12:00
because everyone is guaranteed the right
00:12:01
to receive qualified
00:12:03
legal assistance and the constitution is a
00:12:05
law of direct action, therefore, the
00:12:07
inspector cannot simply take and deprive
00:12:09
you of a constitutional right defined in
00:12:11
this way by law, the fact is that
00:12:14
you may not have special knowledge
00:12:16
to determine on the spot in the moment in the
00:12:18
field or on the side of the road whether you are guilty or not,
00:12:21
you need to think about reading the information,
00:12:23
consult with a lawyer and take
00:12:26
him into the case, it’s normal if you are
00:12:28
stopped somewhere and the mattress is right
00:12:30
on your own, you don’t have lawyers, so you
00:12:33
need time in order to attract him,
00:12:34
accordingly, the case must be
00:12:36
considered at another time, and perhaps
00:12:38
in another place, if you make such
00:12:40
a petition, the inspector on the spot
00:12:42
will be forced to postpone the consideration of this case, there
00:12:45
is nothing wrong with this at all; moreover, both a
00:12:48
lawyer and an ordinary person with
00:12:50
sufficient resources can act as a defender you do
00:12:53
n’t even need special education,
00:12:55
you can also apply for
00:12:57
your case to be examined at your place of
00:12:59
residence and it is also subject to
00:13:00
mandatory satisfaction if you
00:13:02
came from Moscow vladivostok and you were
00:13:05
stopped by an inspector he has a
00:13:06
claim against you he draws up a
00:13:08
strange protocol send the case to the local court
00:13:10
you just don’t travel from there,
00:13:12
so you won’t be able to provide
00:13:13
your defense; the case will be scheduled to be considered
00:13:16
in a month, then the judge will reschedule; the judge will get
00:13:18
sick and all this time you have to
00:13:19
fly; well, of course no, no one can
00:13:23
be deprived of the right to have his
00:13:24
case considered in that court and by that judge to have
00:13:27
jurisdiction which it is classified by law
00:13:29
and the law in this case states that
00:13:31
you have the right to have the
00:13:32
case considered at your place of residence, and accordingly
00:13:34
the inspector is obliged to send the case to
00:13:37
your home, and in my opinion we are talking
00:13:39
not only about deprivation clauses but also about
00:13:41
ordinary offenses that you
00:13:42
have the right to consider on the spot, after all, if
00:13:44
you are given a fine and speeding ticket on the spot,
00:13:46
but you don’t agree with it, you
00:13:48
will have to appeal it to the local
00:13:49
court, but why should you challenge the fine in
00:13:52
Vladivostok or in a regional city, what kind of
00:13:54
paper is a handful that you came past
00:13:57
on the way when you live in in Moscow, let him
00:13:59
also send cases to your place of residence
00:14:00
and then you can go to your district
00:14:02
court to challenge, otherwise it will be a
00:14:05
violation of the right to review the
00:14:06
enshrined constitution, I will repeat
00:14:09
and summarize again, do not hesitate to submit
00:14:11
petitions, but be sure to write them,
00:14:13
even if the inspector on the spot does not
00:14:15
consider it and will ignore it then
00:14:17
you can calmly think about how to
00:14:19
challenge this document, apply for
00:14:21
anything, for example, to confiscate a record from a
00:14:23
nearby store, especially for an accident,
00:14:25
this is useful, but sometimes even in case of violation of
00:14:27
victory, it also helps, by the way, a very
00:14:30
useful petition for many
00:14:31
drivers who come from other
00:14:33
countries, especially neighboring countries if
00:14:36
you do not fully have knowledge
00:14:38
of the Russian language, petitioning for the
00:14:39
case to be postponed and considered with the
00:14:42
assistance of
00:14:43
translators because he is accusing you of something,
00:14:45
you may not even understand the essence of the
00:14:47
depth and scope of the accusations, so feel free
00:14:49
to submit a petition that you do not have
00:14:51
sufficient knowledge Russian language and you
00:14:53
need a translator and he will also be
00:14:55
forced to create Dan, use your
00:14:57
rights and opportunities, this is not the time
00:14:59
to be shy if something happens later you will be
00:15:02
embarrassed when you ride on the bus
00:15:03
without a license, and when considering your
00:15:06
case, you don’t need to do this, by the way, one of the
00:15:08
basic rights that exist is the
00:15:10
famous Article 51 of the Constitution, no one is
00:15:13
obliged to testify against
00:15:15
themselves, their spouse and close
00:15:17
relatives, translated into ordinary
00:15:19
Russian, this means that you have
00:15:21
the right not to give evidence that can
00:15:23
be used to
00:15:25
incriminate you or loved ones by giving a
00:15:27
clip of the meeting, I refuse, it says
00:15:30
the test from Article 51 constitution and no one
00:15:33
can force you to testify,
00:15:35
however, I do not usually advise using
00:15:37
this stage without a real necessary reason
00:15:39
if the court receives material where you
00:15:41
refused to testify, well,
00:15:43
after that she will think that you have something to
00:15:44
hide, that you are more likely to be guilty than
00:15:47
not, so we return
00:15:49
give detailed testimony a little earlier, immediately
00:15:51
record your position, never
00:15:54
sign the protocol without looking, it would
00:15:55
seem obvious and trivial, but
00:15:57
still there is a mandatory line,
00:15:59
agree with the violation, sign it and
00:16:01
then it will be a million times more difficult to prove
00:16:03
that you did it by mistake, that the
00:16:05
inspector spoke teeth and so on, don’t be
00:16:07
fooled by the talk that you sign there,
00:16:09
you’ll be free to go, I’ve had many
00:16:11
cases where they slipped in a refusal of a
00:16:13
medical examination, and this is
00:16:15
automatically deprivation of your rights, so
00:16:16
read the protocol calmly, don’t rush,
00:16:19
these extra five minutes could cost you your
00:16:22
license for several months, or maybe
00:16:24
for several years, what you definitely shouldn’t
00:16:26
do is refuse to sign the
00:16:28
protocol, I’ve heard the following types: I don’t
00:16:30
agree, I won’t sign anything, in this
00:16:32
case, the inspector stops the witnesses and
00:16:34
in their presence they sign that you
00:16:35
refused to sign, you don’t
00:16:38
gain anything, but you lose the opportunity
00:16:40
to reflect your position is a fatal mistake,
00:16:42
but someone will say that in life everything is not so
00:16:45
simple and the right is violated to the left and to the
00:16:47
right, yes it is, but no one has canceled
00:16:49
the need to fight for your rights and
00:16:51
justice in my judicial practice
00:16:54
there are cases that seemed
00:16:55
hopeless and the judge recognized the person
00:16:57
nevian Aries the truth is that there are
00:16:59
much more opposite cases, this must be admitted if
00:17:01
you go to court 1 of 1 which you can
00:17:04
hear there is no reason not to trust
00:17:05
the testimony of the inspector, while the
00:17:08
court is critical of your words and showed them
00:17:09
because you are interested in a
00:17:11
positive outcome of the case, judges sometimes
00:17:13
do the following a cunning trick they write in the
00:17:16
decision that the court analyzed the
00:17:17
entire body of evidence, namely the
00:17:19
protocol on an administrative
00:17:21
offense, the violation scheme if
00:17:23
it was drawn up with the testimony of an inspector and
00:17:25
they are all logical and contradictory, how do you
00:17:27
like it and the protocols, scheme and testimony, all
00:17:29
this was done by one person, the inspector, and you are
00:17:32
replaced by the quantity as they say
00:17:34
that there is actually some kind of totality, of
00:17:36
course, in this case it’s actually
00:17:38
word against word and this is a terribly vicious
00:17:41
practice in Russian courts, which
00:17:43
implies that you are definitely lying to
00:17:45
avoid punishment, and the inspector is honest
00:17:47
professionals and of course always tell
00:17:49
the truth, although if you think about it, the inspector is
00:17:52
directly interested in the
00:17:53
indictment against you, judge for yourself if
00:17:56
you are found innocent, then he will get a
00:17:58
big hit for it; it turns out that he will
00:18:00
look like he is drowning for your guilt, even
00:18:02
if he has already realized that he was mistaken and admitted
00:18:04
it to himself, he simply has no other
00:18:06
way, and why should your testimony be
00:18:08
treated critically, are you a criminal
00:18:11
or are you not guilty a priori until guilt is
00:18:13
proven, alas, but this happens all the
00:18:15
time, justice can
00:18:17
only be achieved by appealing decisions already
00:18:19
at the level of the Supreme Court, it is
00:18:21
truly independent and its judges
00:18:23
can accept and consider cases
00:18:26
on virtually any grounds True, by this
00:18:29
moment the sentence usually expires
00:18:31
even for the largest articles
00:18:32
and the point is to go to the Supreme Court, well, only on the
00:18:35
principle of proving innocence, although by
00:18:37
this moment the decision on your rights has already been
00:18:39
completed, it will also help create a
00:18:41
precedent and change judicial practice
00:18:43
for other drivers, but ours is with you
00:18:45
the task is to be armed with your rights
00:18:48
and be able to stand up for yourself, so we will
00:18:50
continue to make a series of videos teaching
00:18:53
basic legal knowledge, if
00:18:56
you disagree with me on something, come
00:18:58
argue in the comments it will be hot with
00:19:01
you was Shumsky, like it,
00:19:02
subscribe to the channel and see you again
00:19:07
[music]

Description:

Сегодня поговорим о ситуациях, когда вас остановил инспектор ГИБДД и хочет выписать протокол или постановление со штрафом. Вы скорее всего задавались вопросами: - Что написать в этих документах? - Стоит ли отказываться от подписи, если не согласен с обвинением - Какие у меня есть права? В этом выпуске разбираемся с тем, что можно делать, а что нельзя. С вами Шумский. 📘 Мой телеграм: https://t.me/+glqp3cNrQiRkMmIy ТАЙМЛАЙН: 01:23 Презумпция невиновности. Водитель является невиновным пока его вина не будет доказана. 02:43 Неустранимые сомнения виновности лица, привлекаемого к ответственности толкуются в пользу этого лица. 03:40 Водитель не обязан доказывать свою невиновность. 05:55 Чем протоколе и отличается от постановления? 07:06 Что писать в протоколе? 09:17 Инспектор говорит, что есть доказательства вашей вины, но не показывает 09:44 Что можно писать в протоколе? 10:27 Кем могут выступать свидетели? 11:21 Что такое "ходатайство" и почему это самое мощное оружие в руках водителя? 14:50 Не знаете русский язык как родной? И для вас есть лайфхак 15:53 Никогда не подписываете протокол не глядя! ________________________________ Рекомендую к просмотру ✅ 🔸 Как не получить штраф на знаке СТОП? Секрет работы камер - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlFt7K0wG1Q 🔸 Как кидают в автосалоне? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AJgltq71d4 🔸 Какие АЗС обманывают? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1pxpN69HRY 🔸 Итоги экспертизы бензина - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rRGM0SuKEE ________________________________ Мы в социальных сетях: Телеграм: https://t.me/+glqp3cNrQiRkMmIy YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Proboknetvideo Instagram* – https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Фейсбук*: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Вконтакте: https://vk.com/proboknet Тик Ток: https://www.tiktok.com/explore *Запрещенные соц сети на территории РФ

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Никогда не подписывайте протокол не глядя! ЧТО ПИСАТЬ В ПРОТОКОЛЕ? Почему не отказываться от подписи"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.