Download "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"

"videoThumbnail SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"

🔴 L'ARCHIVIAZIONE DI SPERANZA CONTRADDICE PERFINO L'EMA | PT.1 ▷ "ORA SI RIAPRANO LE INDAGINI"

🔴 L'ARCHIVIAZIONE DI SPERANZA CONTRADDICE PERFINO L'EMA | PT.1 ▷ "ORA SI RIAPRANO LE INDAGINI"

Channel: Radio Radio TV

radio radio

radio

giovanni frajese

frajese

un giorno speciale

vaccino

covid

vaccini covid

sars cov 2

roberto speranza

speranza

00:00:01

responsibility because because in short

00:00:03

because there are

00:00:07

unprecedented scientific collaborations I'm reading verbatim Eh which

00:00:10

have allowed us to complete the

00:00:13

research, development and authorizations

00:00:17

of the Listen carefully Vaccine against

00:00:23

covid-19 in

00:00:27

record time So they speak here of

00:00:30

vaccine against

00:00:32

covid-19 not against sarscov 2 which is

00:00:35

the virus therefore they talk about vaccine

00:00:38

against covid-19 which is the

00:00:43

disease not the

00:00:45

virus Attention it is the disease not the

00:00:49

virus therefore the judges confirm that it is

00:00:52

against covid- 19 therefore we cannot

00:00:55

therefore if it is against covid-19 it should

00:00:57

be more of a cure a therapy therefore

00:01:00

a vaccine a therapy a cure because

00:01:01

covid-19 is a disease

00:01:04

deriving from the sarscov 2 virus however

00:01:09

while the virus is something that you

00:01:11

catch you can transmit transfer

00:01:13

etc. therefore the possible vaccine If

00:01:15

it should serve to immunize against the

00:01:19

virus Because everything that cures or

00:01:22

protects the disease is called It's called a

00:01:24

cure it's called therapy it's not called a

00:01:26

vaccine No okay let's move on with this

00:01:29

then now explain it to us Better Vanni and

00:01:32

then they say by maintaining high

00:01:38

safety standards, the vaccines have proven,

00:01:41

say the judges, to be safe and effective in

00:01:44

large Phase 3 clinical trials,

00:01:46

satisfying the safety

00:01:49

and efficacy parameters agreed at an

00:01:52

international level before being

00:01:56

introduced into the

00:01:58

national immunization programmes. On this I ask

00:02:01

Vanni because that is the judges say no

00:02:05

no hope he didn't do anything because

00:02:07

even before he introduced the

00:02:10

immunization program

00:02:13

all the studies had already been done everything was

00:02:14

safe everything tested etc. etc. and

00:02:16

then there is always the Covid affair

00:02:19

instead of the therefore oh well This, however, is

00:02:21

another question

00:02:23

that essentially would never have

00:02:26

allowed anyone to be able to force

00:02:29

people to inoculate Be a drug that did

00:02:31

not protect against the virus But if anything it

00:02:35

would have alleviated the disease which then

00:02:37

what the houses said F But this

00:02:38

is a 'another question But on the

00:02:40

question of the large

00:02:42

Phase 3 clinical trials completed before being

00:02:44

introduced Vanni you have something to

00:02:48

say it's false like many other things that

00:02:51

have been said at an institutional level

00:02:53

in these 3 years By now we are lying

00:02:56

calmly probably the judges

00:02:58

aren't even aware of the fact

00:03:00

that they are passing off a counterfeit currency

00:03:02

but it remains a counterfeit coin meanwhile

00:03:05

I remember the first time it ended up on

00:03:07

television councilors explained that

00:03:09

the trial What does

00:03:11

scientific experimentation mean for example

00:03:12

in children aged 5 to 12 would have

00:03:15

seen the end of the

00:03:17

Phase 3 trial I think is July of

00:03:20

this year So now that we are

00:03:23

talking about 3 years later the vaccine in

00:03:25

reality still remains

00:03:27

experimental having said that it

00:03:30

is all based on an ideology that

00:03:32

always remains the same, that is, which is

00:03:33

summarized from two words that are written

00:03:35

there in the middle i.e. the vaccine is safe and

00:03:37

effective this is a mantra that we have

00:03:40

heard since before the

00:03:42

vaccines arrived it has the whole rollout and is still

00:03:44

carried out today as if it were

00:03:46

a simply untouchable truth

00:03:49

eh the other untouchable truth that

00:03:52

uses somewhat bizarre

00:03:54

WHO data based on mathematical models that

00:03:56

are better ignored No says the vaccine has

00:03:59

saved millions of people's lives the

00:04:01

scientific data today tells a

00:04:03

completely different thing but without

00:04:04

going into technical details I believe that

00:04:07

on the effectiveness for example it is there

00:04:10

for all to see remember No 95%

00:04:12

for example let's leave aside the issue

00:04:14

of sarscov 2 which now they have

00:04:16

changed it because before it was mentioned but

00:04:19

the initial data was 95%

00:04:23

effective against developing the disease

00:04:25

any symptom of the disease now

00:04:27

How many millions of Italians have taken

00:04:29

vaccines How many millions of these people

00:04:31

have had covid they have taken it and

00:04:33

have passed it on to other people

00:04:36

we want to remember that the Prime Minister

00:04:38

at the time Mario Draghi said

00:04:40

that the Green pass was

00:04:42

an action that would have given

00:04:45

confidence and not taken away serenity because one

00:04:48

had the guarantee of being among people

00:04:50

who could not infect and that this

00:04:52

was another sensational lie and therefore

00:04:55

they continue to tell lies

00:04:56

convinced in some way that that

00:04:58

lie It's a

00:05:00

shame that in the eyes of reality in the

00:05:02

eyes of the people who have instead

00:05:04

had the disease and perhaps been vaccinated three or three or

00:05:07

four times have become

00:05:08

infected three or four times and have

00:05:10

developed the disease and by

00:05:13

going back that is, to me it becomes

00:05:15

easy to say Look, the first time

00:05:16

I came to the Senate in 2021 and I

00:05:19

said Look, 95% efficacy has been

00:05:21

published, doses others have published

00:05:23

on Lanset, it is relative to Placebo in an

00:05:25

absolute sense, the protection offered is

00:05:26

less than 1% which is what then

00:05:28

happened in all the facts. So the

00:05:31

data was known from the beginning but

00:05:33

evidently the judicial system

00:05:35

is not very upto date as

00:05:38

the English say with what are the

00:05:40

scientific truths that are based on the

00:05:42

data and not on ideologies. The problem is

00:05:45

that until there is an openness,

00:05:46

especially on the part of medical bodies and

00:05:49

university organizations, to

00:05:52

clarify what the reality

00:05:54

of these hygiene products is, we

00:05:55

will continue to move forward telling

00:05:57

people lies like what

00:05:59

was told here the participating Member State

00:06:02

also recognizes that the

00:06:04

long-term effects and effectiveness

00:06:06

of the vaccine are not currently known and

00:06:10

that there may be

00:06:12

adverse effects of the vaccine which are not currently

00:06:18

known. This is enough for us. This question enough

00:06:24

Oh if it's not enough we can still go

00:06:28

and reread if we want quickly

00:06:31

before the comments what

00:06:34

Lema

00:06:35

writes what Lema writes in

00:06:39

response to the MPs who last

00:06:42

October 18, 2023 had asked the

00:06:47

EMA a question and had asked

00:06:50

Lema Sorry

00:06:53

but these vaccines are used to stop the

00:06:57

virus or only for

00:07:00

personal reasons only for

00:07:02

personal protection and have

00:07:04

nothing to do with

00:07:06

transmission you don't get vaccinated you get sick You

00:07:08

die it causes the others to die infected

00:07:11

others you can't go to work This

00:07:13

is the question that was asked mail to the EMA and

00:07:16

I would like to remind you as we did yesterday

00:07:17

with the lawyer Zen that the EMA is the only

00:07:20

body

00:07:22

currently delegated by governments to respond

00:07:27

to this, the WHO has nothing to do with it. Let's

00:07:29

hope it never has anything to do with it so

00:07:31

here too there is an error both on the part of the

00:07:34

judges and on the part of

00:07:36

public opinion which believes that the WHO can

00:07:38

dictate rules, no only Lema can do it

00:07:42

clear no good Lema what does he say to the

00:07:46

honorable de graff coler donated

00:07:49

our Francesca Donato Joakim Cash and

00:07:51

others who had asked this

00:07:53

question says you affirm and here

00:07:57

it says affirm because in English

00:07:59

there is the You which we don't have no the You is

00:08:02

you you etc.

00:08:04

you affirm that based on the

00:08:06

authorized indications the vaccines should be

00:08:08

administered only to individuals

00:08:09

seeking personal protection and are not

00:08:12

authorized to reduce

00:08:14

transmission or infection rates

00:08:16

or control

00:08:19

transmission. What does

00:08:23

the EMA respond to? You are correct in indicating that the

00:08:26

Covid-19 vaccines have not been

00:08:29

authorized to prevent

00:08:31

transmission from one person to another the

00:08:34

indications are to protect only

00:08:38

vaccinated individuals the

00:08:41

product information of the vaccines

00:08:42

clearly indicates that the vaccines are to

00:08:44

prevent

00:08:46

covid1 Furthermore the EMA evaluation reports

00:08:49

on the authorization of the vaccines

00:08:50

note the lack of data on the

00:08:54

transmissibility

00:08:57

after which we also have, if we want to

00:09:00

conclude, the

00:09:02

information leaflet from comirnati which would be the

00:09:05

pfizer is a vaccine they say they

00:09:07

call it a vaccine used this is the

00:09:10

information leaflet Eh which you

00:09:11

should have read and

00:09:13

[Music]

00:09:15

signed Before having it

00:09:18

inoculated for prevention of covid-19

00:09:22

disease caused by the sarz virus COV 2

00:09:26

so they have nothing to do with the virus

00:09:30

Clear zero so this is the

00:09:35

proven proof that that motivation is a

00:09:37

fake here I always go back again first to

00:09:41

Vanni and then to Alberto but it seems to me that

00:09:43

this So let's also be faced with the

00:09:46

documents that tell us that that is

00:09:48

false because this

00:09:51

contract document is from the end of 2020 and

00:09:55

therefore and there are no others that say

00:09:58

no no let's deny that that is And therefore

00:10:02

it is not true that the phase has begun of of of of

00:10:05

som of vaccination campaign

00:10:08

when the studies were finished everything was

00:10:10

fine it was all Sure No why and the

00:10:13

states knew it because there was a

00:10:14

contract that said Look for

00:10:15

goodness sake we don't know anything about the

00:10:17

effects be careful we don't even know if it

00:10:19

works they say so on the

00:10:22

Vanni

00:10:24

and Fabio contract. There's little to add. I've been going on for 3

00:10:28

years saying that these

00:10:30

are all lies. They are lies

00:10:32

which, among other things, the

00:10:34

pharmaceutical company and, if desired, the EMA itself

00:10:37

actually don't have. never brought up

00:10:40

were the governments that

00:10:42

used propaganda that had no

00:10:44

meaning and when asked the answer

00:10:47

was precise both from the EMA and from

00:10:49

Janin Small which was the one

00:10:51

Alberto was referring to before which among other things was

00:10:53

not in that famous question

00:10:55

at the European Parliament he started laughing

00:10:57

saying No Exactly we haven't

00:11:00

studied this thing but he was laughing because

00:11:02

it was obvious it was obvious it was written

00:11:04

everywhere but people were

00:11:06

told something completely

00:11:08

different as I say it for the

00:11:11

millionth time i.e. We have arrived at

00:11:14

say to take this drug in

00:11:17

pregnant women on the

00:11:21

basis of zero scientific data which

00:11:24

had never been studied and

00:11:26

at the same time in the absence of

00:11:28

genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies,

00:11:31

something I have also been saying for 3 years now

00:11:32

history perhaps

00:11:35

doesn't teach much but between the 50s and

00:11:38

60s there was the thalidomide scandal.

00:11:41

It took almost 10 years for it to be

00:11:43

noticed in some way and

00:11:45

20,000 malformations of children in the

00:11:47

meantime plus all the abortions that

00:11:49

were not counted. To realize that instead

00:11:51

there was a problem that concerned, let's say,

00:11:54

the interaction at the level of

00:11:57

genotoxicity and therefore it seems to me only

00:11:59

in 1962 that the drug was withdrawn, it

00:12:04

took the pharmaceutical company itself 50 years to say that they remained

00:12:06

silent, they were sorry we didn't

00:12:08

learn anything from that story because

00:12:10

we are running exactly the same

00:12:12

risk in the same way now in the

00:12:14

60's It took us almost 10 years to

00:12:17

see any connections and damage

00:12:19

Connected to let's say to discussions

00:12:21

concerning for example motherhood

00:12:23

Let's hope it doesn't take the

00:12:25

same period of time To

00:12:27

maybe realize that maybe it's worth doing what I've been

00:12:30

saying for 3 years to do

00:12:32

those tests that haven't been done And

00:12:34

why is it still

00:12:35

used today and continues to be

00:12:37

produced without us

00:12:39

actually knowing what kind of consequences there

00:12:41

can be be

00:12:43

um in the end what leaves you dismayed in

00:12:46

some way But I think it's a

00:12:47

slap that you have to take sometimes in the

00:12:49

face to realize the real

00:12:51

problem is what underlies all

00:12:53

this, that is, when you have the

00:12:56

President of the Republic the

00:12:58

president the I advise the Pope Well and

00:13:02

so on and so forth who in reality

00:13:05

knowingly or not but I imagine that the

00:13:07

leaders of the State were aware

00:13:09

they had the courage to

00:13:11

shamelessly lie to the population and to

00:13:14

link the possibility

00:13:16

of working or not to a lie country which has

00:13:19

in the first article of the Constitution that

00:13:21

Italy is a country founded on work

00:13:23

therefore on the basis of a lie they

00:13:25

have taken away the possibility of living

00:13:26

peacefully and working, people

00:13:29

must understand this because regardless of the

00:13:30

positions on the virus regardless from the

00:13:33

positions on vaccines which if they were a

00:13:35

little more informed it would be much better,

00:13:37

however the fact that the highest

00:13:39

authority of the State lied to you in

00:13:41

the knowledge that they were lying gives us a picture

00:13:44

of the reality that

00:13:45

we need to start looking at with a

00:13:47

cool head, that is, in fact, the the people are not

00:13:50

sovereign because you can lie to the people

00:13:52

if the people are not sovereign it means that

00:13:54

the master is someone else and who is that

00:13:57

someone else I don't know seeing that

00:13:58

the man of the markets was the one who

00:14:00

carried the lies further to

00:14:03

the previous ones perhaps we should ask

00:14:05

ourselves whether in reality it is these

00:14:07

markets that now influence

00:14:09

our life and that democracy is

00:14:10

only an illusion. Here are other

00:14:13

topics. Now Alberto will also have

00:14:15

his say but I want to ask you a question last thing

00:14:17

Vanni on this question,

00:14:20

that is,

00:14:23

we, even non-doctors, we

00:14:26

ordinary citizens have been accustomed to thinking because

00:14:28

not only doctors but also at school have told us this, that is, there was

00:14:30

There was also a part

00:14:31

of school education that we said

00:14:33

where he also spoke about this he spoke about

00:14:36

the medicine of Science and

00:14:37

above all also in reference both

00:14:39

to the experience of Galileo Galilei No from the

00:14:41

technical scientific point of view

00:14:42

he concerned the Cosmos but

00:14:45

also from the medical and health point of view

00:14:47

That is, they told us be careful

00:14:50

that the drugs when come out on the market they

00:14:52

may not be safe because it

00:14:54

takes time because the

00:14:56

trials must be increasingly

00:14:57

longer and precisely because we still don't

00:15:02

know how the human body is

00:15:05

really made we only know a small

00:15:07

percentage of it and therefore some things must

00:15:10

always be placed in doubt which is then

00:15:15

resolved over time with observation,

00:15:17

continuous experimentation and some

00:15:19

adverse effects of drugs even of

00:15:21

any product but also of a

00:15:23

new food that we eat no ok So here

00:15:26

the fact that an artificial chemical product

00:15:29

can create adverse effects

00:15:33

on people and this is a well-known fact.

00:15:36

So here's the question, dear Vanni, but to

00:15:40

those who justify themselves by saying or

00:15:42

even to those people who believed in

00:15:44

this theory, that is, today

00:15:47

with modern instruments we can

00:15:50

greatly shorten the experiments

00:15:52

after already two three months two three of these

00:15:54

experiments that we do etc.

00:15:56

etc. we have already understood everything is

00:15:59

safe and therefore I could force it on you. Even

00:16:02

because I don't hurt you.

00:16:04

This is what is

00:16:06

also unfortunately written in some of

00:16:08

these sentences. Here it is possible that the

00:16:11

medicine has made this leap

00:16:13

forward so as to make T snap his fingers

00:16:15

and and a

00:16:18

biological chemical preparation ecca could

00:16:21

be harmless it really is

00:16:24

possible need the time necessary

00:16:27

to follow the experimentation it is not that it

00:16:29

takes a genius to understand it if

00:16:31

let's say things happen for example to 3 or 4

00:16:33

years later for a series of

00:16:35

mechanisms that are not currently

00:16:37

known means that before three or 4

00:16:39

years for example you will not be able to see them

00:16:41

or record them, before you see them you

00:16:43

record them and then afterwards you understand that there is a

00:16:45

correlation more years pass so

00:16:47

there is a need for experimentation as has

00:16:49

always been the case in the history

00:16:50

of medicine which must be done in the

00:16:52

right time it is not enough to do the Wars

00:16:55

Speed operation and suddenly say that 60

00:16:57

days of experimentation are

00:16:59

enough. In fact it is not the

00:17:01

drug is still basically

00:17:03

experimental today. Also because we don't

00:17:05

even know how long the action of the

00:17:07

production of this Spy lasts, among

00:17:10

other things, a series of

00:17:11

incredible innovations have been cleared through customs such as for example the

00:17:14

presence of methyl pseudouridine,

00:17:16

i.e. a synthetic base which it was

00:17:18

placed inside the RNA to

00:17:20

guarantee its stability, it guarantees it

00:17:22

so much that we don't know how long it lasts

00:17:25

but it certainly lasts for an

00:17:26

infinitely longer period than 244 hours,

00:17:29

another lie that they have propagated to us

00:17:31

And recently an article came out on neer

00:17:33

that is in reality demonstrating

00:17:35

that the presence of this

00:17:37

synthetic element for which among

00:17:39

other things the authors and discoverers

00:17:41

were also given the Nobile prize is actually

00:17:43

implicated in the formation of

00:17:46

tumors

00:17:47

and unfortunately the scientific data

00:17:50

is accumulating what is not happening

00:17:52

is transparent information also

00:17:55

because science, to be transparent,

00:17:58

must obviously be mindfully detached

00:17:59

from what is the object of its

00:18:01

observation in order to be able to

00:18:03

observe it in the most serene way

00:18:04

possible. There is such a conflict of

00:18:06

interest instead in what

00:18:08

happened to political level,

00:18:10

economic level, health organization level,

00:18:12

that serenity, let's say,

00:18:15

of observation does not exist even a

00:18:16

little if then at the basis of all this there

00:18:19

are entities that are now

00:18:22

80% financed by private individuals and by the same

00:18:24

pharmaceutical companies that produce the products

00:18:26

Well then you understand by yourself that the

00:18:28

observations can never be objective

00:18:30

and I think that we need to go back to

00:18:32

the simple logic of things, that is, if

00:18:35

you want to have security

00:18:36

regarding the use of drugs in the

00:18:39

population there is no there must be a conflict

00:18:41

of interest between whoever is acting as

00:18:43

controller and whoever produces

00:18:45

the drugs that are sold to

00:18:47

people. I don't understand how such a principle

00:18:50

cannot be embraced by

00:18:52

everyone as simply common sense,

00:18:55

otherwise human nature is tempted,

00:18:58

let's say from what are the fragilities

00:19:01

of each of us, if you like,

00:19:03

we obviously know that money and power are

00:19:05

still able in some way to

00:19:07

make you deviate from the path of truth

00:19:08

but the path of truth on a

00:19:10

scientific level is based on an

00:19:12

experimental observation of data without of any

00:19:15

ideology in this story we have seen

00:19:17

ideology from before the vaccine

00:19:19

arrived and continues today

Description:

▷ AIUTA L'INFORMAZIONE LIBERA, SOSTIENICI: https://donazioni.radioradio.it/ "Collaborazioni scientifiche senza precedenti hanno consentito di completare la ricerca del #vaccino contro il #COVID19". Poi l'altra fatale affermazione: "I vaccini si sono dimostrati sicuri ed efficaci in ampi studi clinici di Fase III, soddisfacendo i parametri di sicurezza ed efficacia concordati a livello internazionale, prima di essere introdotti nei programmi di immunizzazione nazionali". Queste le motivazioni con cui le tre giudici del Tribunale dei Ministri di Roma hanno archiviato il caso di Roberto #Speranza, accusato in merito alla gestione dell'emergenza pandemica. Molti i dubbi su come sono stati gestiti i vaccini contro il SARS-Cov-2, e molte le critiche sulle dichiarazioni in merito agli effetti avversi. Tra le altre cose, gli Aifaleaks emersi da Fuori dal Coro hanno fatto sapere che tali conseguenze del vaccino sarebbero state minimizzate o nascoste. Il Comitato Ascoltami ha così portato l'ex ministro della Salute in tribunale, senza successo. Nelle motivazioni però qualcosa non torna. Ne abbiamo parlato con l'endocrinolgo Giovanni Frajese a Un Giorno Speciale. #Covid ▷ ISCRIVITI AL NOSTRO CANALE YOUTUBE: https://bit.ly/2MeYWI7 ▷ ULTERIORI APPROFONDIMENTI SU: https://www.radioradio.it/

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE"" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE""?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "SPERANZA, FRAJESE ANALIZZA PUNTO PER PUNTO LA SENTENZA ▷ "ECCO QUANDO FINISCE LA SPERIMENTAZIONE""?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.