background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным"

input logo icon
"videoThumbnail Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Начало
0:50
Григория внесли в список иноагентов
4:12
Поддерживают ли россияне войну?
6:37
Россияне привыкли к войне?
9:46
Про демократию в России
15:10
Как путинская идеология породила ресентимент?
19:16
Какая политическая система в России?
25:22
Насколько военизировано российское общество?
28:47
Почему часть россиян одобряет войну?
33:22
Как поменялось отношение россиян к вопросам вины и ответственности?
37:55
Про Бориса Надеждина
39:35
У каких протестов большой потенциал?
41:55
Есть ли положительный вариант развития событий в России?
Video tags
|

Video tags

война
спецоперация
Честное слово
политика
война с украиной
популярная политика
честное слово
популярная политика прямой эфир
новости сегодня
война украина
путин
россия
украина
новости
Навальный
Навальный LIVE
интервью
григорий юдин
юдин
юдин философ
юдин социолог
ирина аллеман
россияне
общество
опрос
вшэ
юдин интервью
юдин последнее
интервью юдин
социолог
владимир путин
элиты в россии
запад россия
Юдин
Филосов
Социолог
Настроения Россиян
Опрос
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:16
Hello friends, it’s 17 o’clock in Moscow and you’re
00:00:18
watching Honest on the channel
00:00:20
popular politics My name is Irina
00:00:23
Aliman, as usual, I encourage you to
00:00:24
like, write comments in the chat, ask
00:00:27
paid questions through super chat or using
00:00:31
Friend And of course, support you in the
00:00:33
way that is most convenient for you
00:00:36
this is either a patreon or sponsorship on the
00:00:38
tube, I’ll remind you that you can donate it, we’ll go
00:00:41
straight to the conversation with our
00:00:43
guest today, our guest is the long-awaited sociologist
00:00:45
Grigory Yudin Grigory,
00:00:47
hello Hello, Irina is glad to
00:00:51
welcome you, but I want to start
00:00:53
with probably not the most pleasant news, not the
00:00:56
most pleasant possible question in
00:00:58
less than a week ago recognized as a foreign agent
00:01:00
together with you recognized as a foreign agent
00:01:03
lecture hall Living Word in Tver where you
00:01:06
gave a lecture How do you feel in
00:01:09
this capacity and how do you think this
00:01:12
stigma from the Ministry of Justice is generally perceived
00:01:14
in the mass consciousness Well, of course,
00:01:16
in addition to the restrictions that it
00:01:17
imposes on Russians in
00:01:20
Russia it means they recognized that they were
00:01:24
appointed at all, who
00:01:28
appointed you if you were put on the execution
00:01:31
list and were sentenced to death,
00:01:35
what if they declared you dead or something? No, you
00:01:38
were just shot, this is some strange
00:01:41
Putin language that I don’t understand.
00:01:43
Why should you use it? They didn’t
00:01:45
recognize. Vladimir Putin compiled a
00:01:48
list in which declares people his
00:01:51
enemies his associates are constantly
00:01:53
adding to this list, that’s what’s happening, they have
00:01:55
n’t recognized anything in the abstract, it’s not like they’ve
00:01:58
recognized someone, there’s no
00:02:02
there is a list that Vladimir
00:02:04
Putin compiles, his confidants are constantly adding to this list of people
00:02:06
whom he appoints as his enemies, so he’s
00:02:08
actually adding to this list
00:02:10
As
00:02:12
for my person,
00:02:15
what happened on February 24 of this
00:02:21
year at that moment It was obvious that this
00:02:25
would have catastrophic
00:02:27
consequences for a huge number of
00:02:29
people, for the birth of children, people, it would be a
00:02:34
serious grief for many many
00:02:37
years. What is someone doing there?
00:02:41
Putin’s lists are some kind of
00:02:43
insignificant trifle against this background, and this
00:02:47
also applies to my person, too, there is a
00:02:50
lot of grief and
00:02:58
misfortune ahead, shot on the list And besides us, there are
00:03:01
still a huge number of people and
00:03:04
some of them remain in Russia,
00:03:05
so my question is partly was
00:03:07
dictated by how
00:03:10
this is really perceived in society now,
00:03:12
whether people feel sympathy if there is
00:03:14
some kind of trend in society. That’s exactly the
00:03:16
attitude towards this label to this
00:03:18
hit list, well, let’s
00:03:20
leave it and really talk about
00:03:22
that question is not a question, a clear question But
00:03:25
since in Russia in general, people
00:03:29
try to stay as far away
00:03:30
from politics as possible for quite a long time, and with the outbreak of
00:03:32
war especially, this is naturally
00:03:35
the most dangerous part of what is connected
00:03:37
with politics, so well, people
00:03:40
try to stay as far away from this as possible,
00:03:43
as far as we can see from those studies
00:03:45
that there is an idea to discriminate in fact,
00:03:47
fellow citizens do not enjoy the
00:03:51
support of the Russians and the idea that
00:03:53
let us
00:03:56
appoint enemies no, this idea in general does not
00:04:00
respond well with support.
00:04:02
Well, that means it does not react very
00:04:04
well. In the sense that it is not
00:04:06
welcomed. Well, who knows what? Russia does not
00:04:08
welcome Putin’s war, nor does it
00:04:09
welcome it, nevertheless it
00:04:11
continues. When you say that
00:04:13
Putin’s war is not welcomed, you are
00:04:14
relying on some data because
00:04:16
from the very beginning of the war everyone generally
00:04:18
recognized that sociology in war
00:04:20
conditions is
00:04:24
impossible no, that sociology in war
00:04:26
conditions this is impossible no one
00:04:28
said it is rather about the limitations
00:04:32
that arise in connection with issues of
00:04:34
public opinion the issue of
00:04:35
public opinion is not
00:04:37
sociology it is some very
00:04:39
specific political
00:04:42
instrument with it, as it were, there are
00:04:44
quite big problems it has
00:04:45
quite serious limitations from the point of
00:04:47
view of it validity, speaking in
00:04:49
scientific
00:04:50
language Well, it is clear that in conditions of war
00:04:53
these restrictions do not increase more strongly due to the fact
00:04:56
that this instrument is completely
00:04:58
useless,
00:04:59
completely useless from the point of view of its
00:05:02
use as such a referendum, that
00:05:05
is, how the
00:05:08
Kremlin usually invites us to look at it from this point
00:05:10
of view Yes this is a useless tool, but
00:05:12
this does not mean that there are no resources and
00:05:16
sociology does not even mean that it is
00:05:17
impossible to see anything from these surveys over the
00:05:21
last 2 years. It seems to me that there is a
00:05:23
more or less consensus among
00:05:26
researchers, and researchers of
00:05:28
completely different types there, I don’t know how
00:05:30
those
00:05:31
who
00:05:34
categorically, as it were, turned away from these
00:05:36
adventures of the Russian government and
00:05:38
those who continue to work with
00:05:40
the Kremlin, this consensus is that the
00:05:43
share of those who
00:05:54
inspire some specific assessments
00:05:57
But this is a significant
00:06:01
minority, we also have the
00:06:03
opposite group A group
00:06:06
that,
00:06:10
well, internally at least protests
00:06:14
against these decisions, which is
00:06:18
probably most tired of
00:06:19
Vladimir Putin, it is either the same
00:06:21
size or maybe a little larger.
00:06:23
Based on the fact that it is more difficult to
00:06:25
get, between them there are the majority of
00:06:29
fellow citizens who, as was said,
00:06:31
are trying to stay away from all this,
00:06:33
accepts all this how
00:06:34
inevitable they try not to think
00:06:35
about
00:06:36
anything at all Well, last year at the end of
00:06:39
last year, political scientist Andrei
00:06:40
Kolesnikov and sociologist Levada and Denis
00:06:42
Volkov published such a unique
00:06:45
report on the mood of society and, if
00:06:47
very briefly and simply, it boiled down
00:06:50
to the fact that Russians have, for the most part,
00:06:52
adapted to the war, you share
00:06:55
this
00:06:57
thesis VM
00:07:00
can
00:07:01
be checked. I don’t see a way here to
00:07:05
record whether they have adapted or not
00:07:06
adapted. But the fact that the reaction to what is
00:07:10
happening political events in
00:07:12
Russia is the main reaction. In general,
00:07:14
practically the only reaction is
00:07:16
adaptation; I agree with this. Well, yes. If
00:07:18
you can’t do something... what to do about
00:07:20
what is happening, and in Russia no one
00:07:22
experiences such
00:07:23
illusions, then yes, you need to adapt to this,
00:07:25
so people adapt
00:07:28
in general very well, they know
00:07:32
how to adapt, this is our cultural tradition. But tell me, after all, the ability
00:07:36
to adapt. And when I say this,
00:07:37
I don’t attach any negative
00:07:39
connotations or additional meanings, but
00:07:41
one way or another, this ability to
00:07:42
adapt is a cultural feature
00:07:44
or is it a kind of national idea. Well, that
00:07:47
is, is this a property or is it some kind of
00:07:50
foundation? No. What is a national
00:07:53
idea in this case, I didn’t understand it in
00:07:55
principle, well, it’s another Putin,
00:07:58
another Putin construct,
00:08:01
this is, in principle, characteristic
00:08:04
of such autocratic systems that
00:08:07
are built on depolymerization.
00:08:29
What is politics? Why does it need to be
00:08:31
dealt with at the level of common sense?
00:08:33
It’s not clear what a wallet is and
00:08:34
Why it needs to be filled.
00:08:38
but plus to this Yes, there is,
00:08:42
of course, a certain Russian cultural tradition
00:08:44
associated with the relationship with
00:08:46
the state, it
00:08:48
presupposes adaptation. Well, such
00:08:52
adaptation is a cunning adaptation, that is,
00:08:56
the ability to simultaneously not conflict with
00:08:58
the state because it is useless.
00:08:59
She will crush you anyway and not
00:09:01
obey it, that is, the
00:09:13
obvious ethics have eluded in Russia has developed
00:09:15
related to the fact that it’s
00:09:17
impossible to do anything about it anyway, nothing is impossible with this war,
00:09:19
I won’t try, this hopeless
00:09:23
business will end badly, but if
00:09:25
possible, I personally won’t have
00:09:28
anything to do with it. If they
00:09:30
force me directly, I will do something. do it for
00:09:32
show But mostly I will try to
00:09:34
get away from this, it
00:09:36
eludes the thief, don’t get involved with the sick, and
00:09:39
so on, yes, it won’t change anything, but
00:09:42
let it be credited to me in the next world for
00:09:45
pushing people out of politics, and here I
00:09:48
return to your lecture about
00:09:50
democracy, what went wrong with it so
00:09:52
which you just read in the lecture The
00:09:54
Living Word and this repression was
00:09:56
predetermined, but here the lecture is on
00:09:59
fire, it asks an open question what went
00:10:01
wrong with democracy in Russia, but you
00:10:03
personally in the lecture immediately talk about the fact that
00:10:04
perhaps everything went exactly according to plan
00:10:07
Was this very
00:10:08
displacement of
00:10:12
society predetermined? The lecture that I gave in
00:10:17
Tver has the goal of finding some
00:10:21
ideological
00:10:22
foundations for the situation in which We
00:10:25
found ourselves, of course, it was predetermined.
00:10:30
Well, a strange word, we are talking in general about the
00:10:33
events that took place there
00:10:35
about 30 years ago and the ideological
00:10:37
foundations that were laid at that time
00:10:38
if everything was
00:10:40
predetermined, then everything would look like this,
00:10:42
which means 30 years ago something was
00:10:43
done and then everyone else just
00:10:45
drove up the slope and were passengers,
00:10:49
of course No, of course it’s not like that, it’s
00:10:51
more about the fact that at that moment a
00:10:53
powerful ideology was formed which
00:10:56
since then has generally been supported and
00:10:58
reproduced
00:10:59
which Since then no
00:11:01
adequate
00:11:03
answer has been given, mainly because
00:11:05
no one actually
00:11:06
questioned this ideology which, in general,
00:11:10
quite calmly
00:11:11
unites the people who
00:11:13
are in power in Russia today, and in
00:11:18
various bodies, starting with the Kremlin and
00:11:21
continuing there with the central bank and the People
00:11:23
who controlled Russia in the early
00:11:26
decades and carried out aggressive
00:11:29
market reforms, yes, this is the same
00:11:33
ideology, this is an
00:11:34
ideology based on the fact that the most
00:11:38
important thing, of course, is to
00:11:40
build a market economy, the most
00:11:43
important thing is to create a
00:11:45
competitive environment, and the question that
00:11:48
actually interested me in this lecture was
00:11:49
the question of democracy, in general, no one was seriously
00:11:51
concerned about and believed that it would be resolved on
00:11:53
its own. These are the ideological
00:11:56
foundations on which all this was
00:11:57
based and Vladimir Putin continues the regime quite
00:12:00
smoothly this line, both
00:12:02
ideologically and purely biographically, he
00:12:04
comes out of this environment. He himself was part of
00:12:09
this community that
00:12:14
is pushing this ideology, he was a supporter of the
00:12:16
private economy and remains, and Russia,
00:12:19
as a party to the private economy,
00:12:22
remains its most effective
00:12:24
managers, as they sat in the economic
00:12:26
block and
00:12:27
sit in their idea of ​​the world,
00:12:30
nothing has changed in this sense Yes, we see
00:12:32
continuity because once again this
00:12:35
ideology has never been
00:12:37
questioned Well, this is literally what
00:12:40
Alexei Navalny wrote in his manifesto about the
00:12:42
mistakes of the nineties How do you evaluate it
00:12:45
By the way I think that Alexey has started a very
00:12:48
important discussion, uh, you can only,
00:12:51
uh, admire a person who, in the
00:12:54
current conditions, has the strength to start the
00:12:58
Key
00:12:59
key public conversation is a
00:13:00
conversation without which nothing can be
00:13:02
changed now, because until
00:13:06
this illusion is eliminated,
00:13:08
the illusion that you just need to go back
00:13:10
in the nineties, do the same thing again
00:13:12
And then we will succeed.
00:13:15
Until this illusion is
00:13:17
eliminated, there will be no chance of
00:13:19
change in Russia. And the people
00:13:22
who will represent it will
00:13:24
continue to utter anti-people
00:13:25
slogans, as they actually
00:13:27
did in at the beginning and will
00:13:29
receive the same reaction with the same
00:13:31
consequences, what
00:13:34
I don’t agree with with Alexey is that it
00:13:40
seems to me that he is inclined to blame for
00:13:45
what happened. Well, the bad elites, that
00:13:48
is, at that moment,
00:13:54
greedy corrupt people who
00:13:56
thought only about myself
00:13:59
this is sot Ilya that you can just put
00:14:01
other good guys and they will do the
00:14:04
same thing, but now it’s
00:14:05
good for me this is once again
00:14:09
an ideological problem The problem was not that
00:14:11
the wrong people were there,
00:14:13
but the problem was that these people
00:14:16
didn’t matter if they were right or
00:14:18
they began
00:14:19
to implement it incorrectly Well, their view of the world in
00:14:24
which, in principle, there was no place for
00:14:26
democracy, so the EU is about this,
00:14:29
what kind of people will be there, everything will again
00:14:32
have the same outcome, that is, the problem is
00:14:34
not personal in nature And once again,
00:14:37
no one has ever been ideological in Russia did
00:14:40
not seriously try to build democracy, not only
00:14:42
that there were people there
00:14:44
who sabotaged this process, but the
00:14:47
ideology was built on the fact that this is
00:14:50
unimportant, that this is not what needs to be done,
00:14:52
that all democracy should be
00:14:54
reduced to elections, that the main thing is the
00:14:57
market, competition and everything that led to the
00:15:01
modern the structure of Russian
00:15:02
society with monstrous inequality and with a
00:15:05
thin layer of Elite who, in principle,
00:15:07
can afford to do whatever
00:15:09
they want. How did this ideology
00:15:11
create ressentiment?
00:15:15
These dialogues generate ressentiment simply
00:15:17
by their own design; see
00:15:22
if, at the level of common sense, people
00:15:25
are told the same thing all the time And
00:15:27
in fact, the main message of the early
00:15:30
nineties was that everyone
00:15:31
survives on their own, which for 7 years
00:15:35
means we endured some kind of ineffective
00:15:38
system that supported
00:15:39
ineffective forms. Why Because
00:15:41
in general the world is structured
00:15:43
as an environment in which the
00:15:47
fittest survive, so we need to finally free
00:15:50
this environment and let the strongest survive in peace
00:15:53
and all the weaklings should just
00:15:55
die and all this, in general, is a
00:15:59
direct message that accompanied the
00:16:02
reforms of the early nineties and
00:16:06
which was not only broadcast
00:16:08
publicly but also reinforced in public
00:16:10
institutions what does this lead to, this
00:16:13
leads to the fact that well, just like you and me
00:16:15
what they said Russian
00:16:17
learns quickly and adapts quickly and this
00:16:20
lesson was learned quite quickly, it was
00:16:23
he who was involved in the formation of
00:16:27
such a
00:16:29
cynical and in general with elements of
00:16:33
human
00:16:34
hatred subject who always
00:16:36
defends himself by the fact that well, I know what
00:16:38
my interest is and everyone else doesn’t
00:16:40
interest me this is the only way
00:16:41
to survive in this world, common sense in
00:16:45
Russia very quickly turned out to be a
00:16:47
distorted sense around us,
00:16:50
some openly
00:16:53
man-haters began to speak. We can
00:16:54
see this, I know from
00:16:57
some
00:17:00
raps of their successful lives after about the same thing
00:17:04
all the time Thinking about yourself
00:17:07
you need to use the suckers around you and this is the
00:17:12
very lesson that was learned
00:17:14
further. The inevitable consequence of this
00:17:17
is the aggressive competition that
00:17:18
arises in society, the rupture of any
00:17:20
Solidarity and the fact
00:17:27
that every society in it begins
00:17:30
to win the most
00:17:31
unprincipled ones who really
00:17:33
seriously master this science with nothing not to
00:17:36
be taken into account, this is what happened in the
00:17:39
nineties, it was consolidated later in the
00:17:42
2000s, I’ll emphasize that I think
00:17:44
that in the nineties, at least it
00:17:46
was Well, as if there were alternatives Yes, there
00:17:49
were different options And the situation
00:17:51
was not so clear, yes, and then in the
00:17:53
next 20 years Everything, of course,
00:17:55
is fixed when you create a Society in
00:17:58
which
00:17:59
[music]
00:18:00
triumphs the most unprincipled, then
00:18:03
everyone else naturally begins
00:18:04
to feel offended because status
00:18:08
in Russia is not based on anything, what is the
00:18:11
wealth of the Russian oligarchs based on
00:18:13
is that some very smart people They are
00:18:17
something- they are doing something very important and good for the
00:18:19
country. No, everyone knows that this is simply the
00:18:21
most
00:18:27
impudent thing when fabulous wealth and
00:18:30
inequality are not justified by anything, people
00:18:32
begin to feel resentment multiplied
00:18:35
by anger, and this, in fact, gives rise to
00:18:38
ressentiment.
00:18:40
Therefore, yes, this ressentiment then
00:18:42
calmly spills over into foreign
00:18:44
policy Because if your picture
00:18:46
of the world is such that the world is a war of everyone
00:18:48
against everyone, then you begin to
00:18:50
look at international relations in exactly this way. That is why
00:18:52
Vladimir Putin
00:18:54
quite easily imposed his Well, this kind of state
00:18:57
picture in which everyone is
00:19:02
at war with everyone, to impose on many people in Russia
00:19:06
to impose constant paranoia in relation to
00:19:09
others both within the country and its
00:19:11
international environment; these
00:19:13
things are connected with each other; if Vladimir Putin
00:19:17
is a supporter of a market economy, then how do you
00:19:19
determine the nature of his current
00:19:21
power? It is imperial; it is a usurper
00:19:24
or even an announcer because
00:19:26
I am democratic for sure. I can’t call
00:19:29
it monarchy, there is such a very simple term
00:19:33
in political theory, it means
00:19:35
the power of one; absolute monarchy is the
00:19:37
absolute power of one. Sometimes, for some
00:19:42
reason, when we think about monarchy, we
00:19:44
immediately imagine dynastic
00:19:46
inheritance; this is absolutely not always the case;
00:19:49
there have been many cases of elective elections in history.
00:19:52
monarchies and starting from the middle of
00:19:56
the century, the monarchy began to be combined with
00:20:00
universal suffrage, that is,
00:20:03
systems began to emerge, but this first
00:20:05
appeared in France where the Monarch holds
00:20:08
regular plebiscites that make him a
00:20:10
monarch in the name of the people and regularly
00:20:14
renew this legitimacy. Therefore, there is
00:20:16
nothing particularly strange and
00:20:20
surprising about this Monarch not at all
00:20:21
obligatory person in the Monomakh cap
00:20:24
who transfers power by inheritance
00:20:25
no Monarch is the one who has
00:20:27
absolute power If you look
00:20:29
at, say, the Russian Constitution of
00:20:32
2020, you can do a simple
00:20:35
exercise, try to find in this
00:20:37
Constitution some action
00:20:39
that Vladimir Putin cannot
00:20:41
perform Yes, which is forbidden to do
00:20:44
under this Constitution, you are not allowed to do anything of this kind,
00:20:45
this is
00:20:48
absolute power, absolute power, this is
00:20:50
simply in strictly theoretical terms,
00:20:52
this is an absolute monarchy. Therefore, yes,
00:20:53
Russia is an absolute monarchy,
00:20:57
on the basis of the monarchical worldview
00:20:59
of the Kremlin and the monarchy of Vladimir Putin,
00:21:01
as far as they are characteristic
00:21:06
society Well,
00:21:08
in singing, when we talk about a
00:21:11
characteristic society, then we begin,
00:21:14
willy-nilly, a little bit, as if to look for
00:21:17
some kind of essence in society, but
00:21:20
Russia is a complex country with a complex
00:21:22
history and in Russia there are a lot of different
00:21:27
tendencies. But predispositions and so
00:21:30
on, the only question is that What are you talking about?
00:21:33
Is there a tradition of tsarism in Russia? There is
00:21:37
no need to deny it. Yes, in Russia
00:21:41
for a long time there was Tsarist
00:21:44
power and this exists in Russian cultural patterns,
00:21:48
as we understand it. Russia is
00:21:50
the only country where
00:21:54
the monarchy was strong. Yes, it
00:21:57
exists. Is it in ours? culture is different Well,
00:21:59
of course, in our culture there is the experience of
00:22:04
strong republics, there is the experience of constant
00:22:07
revolutionary movements, there is, as we have
00:22:10
already said, anarchist experience, that
00:22:12
is, there is a lot of everything that we
00:22:13
could rely on simply in what we
00:22:15
choose. Therefore, there is no need to ignore
00:22:18
this part our culture and there is no need to
00:22:21
absolutize it Yes, there is a lot of
00:22:24
other things Well, that is, conditionally, the point
00:22:27
where the nation and the state intersect is,
00:22:30
on the one hand, the market reforms of the early
00:22:33
nineties and the absolute monarchical
00:22:36
power of Vladimir Putin, and on the other
00:22:37
hand, the resentment that exists in
00:22:40
society, that is here is partly some kind of
00:22:42
monarchical, maybe also
00:22:44
monarchical Heritage is the point where
00:22:46
they intersect Well about the nation I haven’t
00:22:49
said anything yet, you
00:22:51
used the word
00:22:55
Empire correctly, and what we see right now is
00:22:57
horse realistic
00:23:00
aggression formulated or
00:23:03
based
00:23:04
on the fact that Vladimir Putin made a firm
00:23:08
choice in favor of the fact that Russia is an
00:23:10
empire, this means several things at once,
00:23:13
but this means, in particular, that
00:23:15
Russia has no borders and Putin has
00:23:18
already spoken about this several times. Moreover, as I
00:23:20
understand it, it is now becoming one of the
00:23:22
slogans of the next plebiscite in Teri in
00:23:26
general, there are no borders
00:23:28
The Empire would be located where it managed to
00:23:30
reach other places, it just didn’t have
00:23:32
time to reach yet It’s not
00:23:34
like it doesn’t belong to it, it’s
00:23:36
not ours yet, we’ll get there, it will be
00:23:39
ours, and on the other hand, in internal
00:23:43
terms it’s it just means the
00:23:45
absence, in a sense, of a nation; this,
00:23:48
in general, is the absence of an answer to the question of
00:23:50
what unites us all; we are
00:23:53
united by nothing except expansion and
00:23:56
the figure of the monarch who continues this expansion.
00:23:59
This allows us, as it were, not to
00:24:02
ask difficult questions about what
00:24:05
holds us together and allows in general, Well,
00:24:10
for the time being, at least
00:24:11
push the issue of cohabitation under the rug,
00:24:15
for example, on
00:24:17
this territory. Therefore, so far what
00:24:20
we see is, well, such an imperial
00:24:23
hysteria, this is that Horse attempt to revive
00:24:27
the Empire, but with the Empire, what a thing
00:24:30
the Empire is after all can expand as
00:24:34
long as it has some kind of
00:24:36
justified hegemony, hegemony
00:24:39
involves the proposal of some kind of
00:24:41
vital project of space, for example,
00:24:43
into which it is expanding, which
00:24:45
makes being in this
00:24:48
empire
00:24:50
attractive for these territories,
00:24:52
and Russia today
00:24:54
does not have such a project; any expanding The empire must
00:24:57
that besides military force, yes it is true that it
00:24:59
should not have military force and that
00:25:01
it does a lot with the help of military force, but
00:25:03
military force is implemented by someone who
00:25:05
proposes some kind of civilizational
00:25:07
project. Russia today does not offer
00:25:08
its neighbors anything actually. That is
00:25:10
why Russia's neighbors are mostly afraid of it, well,
00:25:14
at least they are afraid
00:25:16
and, frankly speaking, they are starting to
00:25:20
hate you, you commented in sufficient detail on the
00:25:22
experiment for the jellyfish, yes, una
00:25:25
fat Ryan, I will remind you. They
00:25:29
conducted an experiment in the first year and
00:25:32
revealed the fact that Russian society
00:25:35
showed as if it had an
00:25:37
essence Well, that is, I am now again
00:25:40
addressing your recent words that it is
00:25:42
pointless to try to grope for the essence in it,
00:25:43
but nevertheless, their experiment
00:25:46
showed that Russian society, one way or
00:25:48
another, was already quite
00:25:53
militarized. Look at the results of
00:25:55
this experiment, maybe after
00:25:58
considering it for jellyfish do you
00:26:00
have any additional
00:26:01
confirmation of your words, your hypotheses
00:26:04
or, on the contrary, some contradictory
00:26:10
information regarding the results of this experiment? No, the conclusion of this
00:26:13
experiment seems to me to be exactly
00:26:15
the opposite, and the conclusion is that
00:26:18
if the form if you address people
00:26:22
in language propaganda, then they
00:26:24
accordingly do not answer you in the
00:26:25
language that suggests Propaganda
00:26:28
is such a big Mystery that is not for
00:26:32
those who are engaged in
00:26:34
research methodology in general, in fact, secretly
00:26:36
is not how you ask and answer
00:26:38
what language you offer the respondent in the
00:26:40
question such a language he tells you and will give an
00:26:42
answer Why Because this kind of
00:26:46
question does not actually involve
00:26:47
measurement, you know,
00:26:48
some kind of installation deeply ingrained in our
00:26:52
heads:
00:26:53
I support the war or
00:26:55
I support the war, uh, for the vast
00:26:59
majority of people, especially in
00:27:00
depolymerization,
00:27:27
the most in-depth researchers in this
00:27:29
field, it’s like a model of, you know, a
00:27:34
desktop with drawers, when we
00:27:37
are sitting at our desk and we receive
00:27:38
some kind of request, we start looking in the drawers for
00:27:40
something that can quickly
00:27:42
allow us to answer this question, and someone
00:27:43
comes to us and asks us something
00:27:46
and instead of loading
00:27:48
some kind of program into ourselves and asking ourselves this is
00:27:49
how I really feel there or how
00:27:52
I support I do not support, instead
00:27:54
we react quickly in such a way
00:27:56
that we are looking for something that allows us to
00:27:58
react adequately and competently to
00:28:00
this question something In our experience E that
00:28:03
corresponds to the question asked e and
00:28:07
e this experiment actually exactly
00:28:09
this seems good to me E good and
00:28:12
shows E that as soon as you
00:28:15
ask people in the same language and there are
00:28:17
actually vignettes that were offered
00:28:19
in this experiment they were
00:28:20
formulated in the language of Russian
00:28:24
propaganda, then people react
00:28:25
accordingly, and if
00:28:27
you ask them in another language, they will
00:28:29
react differently. That is why, for
00:28:31
example, many queries that
00:28:33
FBK conducts give different results. Not
00:28:37
because there is some mysterious
00:28:40
methodology, but because simply VBK does not
00:28:42
communicate with people in the language of Putin’s
00:28:44
propaganda, that’s all. Well, obviously that’s why the
00:28:47
head of our sociological service, Anna
00:28:49
Berkova, was arrested in absentia for calls for
00:28:52
terrorism, approval of terrorism,
00:28:54
extremism. In general, that’s all here,
00:28:56
but what’s the matter with Russian
00:28:59
society? Well, Russians in general, no one cares
00:29:01
what hasn’t been asked for quite a long
00:29:03
time, I don’t mean sociologists now.
00:29:06
I mean the Russian government, it doesn’t
00:29:08
ask society
00:29:10
whether it is ready to approve of the war, whether it is ready for
00:29:13
Putin to direct forever, that is,
00:29:15
in principle, such questions are not worth it.
00:29:17
Well, The war has been going on for almost 2 years, Putin is going
00:29:22
to his plebiscite according to his
00:29:26
reassignment, the
00:29:28
number of people is some significant
00:29:31
percentage or a very loud
00:29:32
percentage that approves of both.
00:29:34
Why is it like this
00:29:36
again? What does it mean to approve if by
00:29:39
approves we mean some kind of
00:29:41
reaction that demands
00:29:46
Yes Well, I don’t know, you work in a budget
00:29:50
institution, they tell you that sometime
00:29:53
in March there will be some procedure
00:29:54
called elections and goth Listen, if you’re in trouble,
00:29:56
please go and
00:30:00
vote there, especially now it’s
00:30:01
very easy to do, you don’t have to go anywhere at all, you
00:30:03
just can
00:30:04
register and it means spending 5
00:30:06
minutes to leave your vote on the site, it’s like they
00:30:09
call it approve, I don’t
00:30:12
really know why it should be called that, it’s a
00:30:15
certain procedure that is a
00:30:17
condition for continuing
00:30:18
to work in this budgetary institution without
00:30:21
having any special problems if you don’t
00:30:24
say it, it doesn’t sing there are
00:30:27
such naive people in Russia No, well, you
00:30:30
will get a certain amount of problems,
00:30:31
maybe your bosses will get a certain
00:30:32
amount of problems, there will be
00:30:35
more problems around you. Well, this is roughly
00:30:37
how the
00:30:39
rationality of the average Russian
00:30:42
citizen works, and in general this is a completely
00:30:43
pragmatic approach. I don’t know why to
00:30:45
call it odor
00:30:47
reformulate
00:30:49
Well, at least the politicians who are
00:30:52
promoting over and over again more and more
00:30:54
cannibalistic laws And the Russians are representatives of
00:30:57
Russian society who write
00:30:59
hundreds and thousands of denunciations at least in the
00:31:01
twenty-second year A and in the twenty-
00:31:04
third we observed This is literally
00:31:06
every day every day we see that a
00:31:09
verdict is being passed and against the person
00:31:11
who came out with a poster or changed
00:31:14
the price tags and political prisoners there are
00:31:16
more and more people who
00:31:18
are actors in all these actions,
00:31:21
they
00:31:22
have adapted or they
00:31:25
share Irina Let’s be very
00:31:28
careful and separate two things here So
00:31:29
that we don’t mix up
00:31:31
some a terrible mess, it means one thing
00:31:34
is the people who pass
00:31:36
sentences. Well, in the Russian judicial
00:31:39
system there is a certain percentage. By the way, it’s
00:31:41
not very large, as fellow
00:31:43
judges say who just sit there
00:31:45
to pass down these missed
00:31:47
sentences. Well, they seem to have such a
00:31:49
career trajectory. Well, there is
00:31:51
some kind of I don’t know group of Well,
00:31:53
let’s say several hundred judges Yes,
00:31:56
who don’t bother with this means that
00:31:58
as for informers, a large
00:32:01
number of denunciations are written by a very small
00:32:02
number of people, moreover, as shown,
00:32:06
as shown by recent conversations with
00:32:10
these people. In general, we are even approximately
00:32:11
we know who they are. This is just the
00:32:14
number of people who constantly
00:32:16
do this. Just against the backdrop of quite
00:32:19
powerful pressure in this direction on
00:32:21
society, some sort of epidemic of
00:32:23
denunciations. We generally don’t
00:32:26
see,
00:32:29
we see some isolated cases, but
00:32:32
when people do it either out of fear
00:32:35
which in itself is very bad, and that Luda
00:32:36
can be brought to such a fright,
00:32:39
either by considering it as some kind of
00:32:41
career duty. Well, this is
00:32:45
what we are
00:32:47
seeing, all this is happening against the backdrop of
00:32:49
naturally public passivity
00:32:50
because no one assumes that
00:32:51
the situation can be change, but this is not
00:32:55
some kind of Synergy between
00:32:58
those who are organizing a repression campaign and
00:33:01
joyfully and amicably vpm in this in this
00:33:05
society Yes, no, we see
00:33:08
rather, well, a kind of prostrate
00:33:11
society over which people who are
00:33:15
usurping are
00:33:16
simply trying to mock As they
00:33:21
want after the beginning of the Russian
00:33:23
invasions in 202 happened to Ekaterina
00:33:27
Gordeeva and in my memory Well,
00:33:29
correct me if I’m wrong, you were one
00:33:32
of the first public speakers who
00:33:35
directly said that this is a tragedy for
00:33:36
both peoples, Ukrainian and
00:33:38
Russian, because it seems to me that before
00:33:40
that, basically, maybe it’s my
00:33:42
bubble and its features are mainly about the
00:33:44
fact that this tragedy for the Russian
00:33:46
people for many years and decades,
00:33:48
in my opinion, no one has spoken so publicly
00:33:50
in your opinion over the last 2 years,
00:33:53
how the attitude of Russians in
00:33:57
Russian society to
00:33:59
issues of guilt and responsibility has changed And what in the
00:34:03
future a long war can
00:34:06
mean How it can affect
00:34:08
Russian
00:34:09
society Well, I am a citizen of Russia. Therefore,
00:34:13
I am primarily interested in the fate of
00:34:16
Russia, naturally, and what is happening
00:34:19
is, of course, a monstrous catastrophe from the
00:34:21
point of view of our strategic
00:34:23
prospects, there are no good ways out of it
00:34:29
now, but there can be ways out to be found
00:34:32
only at the moment when they actually are
00:34:34
Well, we will start looking for them together
00:34:37
yes To do this we will have to admit that we
00:34:40
are at a dead end today this dead end
00:34:43
can actually continue for some more,
00:34:44
that is, we can stand in this dead end for
00:34:46
some time and moreover Well
00:34:50
what - there’s just a collapse around when there, I don’t
00:34:52
know, the building will collapse or there,
00:34:56
I don’t know the product, I may not serve for a while,
00:35:00
but if we look not from the perspective
00:35:03
There, but if we look at some kind of
00:35:05
historical perspective and think about the
00:35:08
responsibility for our country about the
00:35:10
fact that there, what we are leaving to the next
00:35:11
generation is of course a catastrophe, but
00:35:14
once again, in order to move on
00:35:16
to finding a way out of this catastrophe, we must
00:35:19
first admit that this is a dead end with this
00:35:21
for now, to the
00:35:25
existing situation, once again, a
00:35:29
pragmatic natural strategy of the foot is
00:35:31
not about all this think somehow
00:35:33
it will be resolved Putin will
00:35:35
come up with something God won’t give it away the pig won’t eat it
00:35:39
And this is, well, this is the short-term logic
00:35:42
that so far
00:35:43
allows us to exist in this sense. I
00:35:46
don’t think that anything
00:35:48
has changed radically and all this talk about guilt
00:35:51
and responsibility is not very adequate to the
00:35:53
current Russian situation,
00:35:55
you see, in order to take
00:35:57
responsibility for something,
00:35:59
or even more so to feel guilty for
00:36:01
something, you first need to
00:36:03
feel like a subject in this
00:36:05
situation. Well, it’s like you’re responsible not
00:36:08
only for your own personal I don’t
00:36:10
know the trajectory there and maybe it will be there for the
00:36:13
good of my children and for something else.
00:36:14
This idea is generally inadequate and does not
00:36:18
correspond to the state of affairs in today’s
00:36:21
Russia. Therefore, this conversation about
00:36:24
responsibility can
00:36:25
only begin when
00:36:27
there is a law there, and
00:36:29
the war is over, the
00:36:32
subjectivity of I appears. I think that in general things are
00:36:35
more likely to be the case for now. So things
00:36:37
will look the other way around because until
00:36:39
Vladimir Putin in power the war
00:36:42
ends, some kind of
00:36:44
subjectivity will be required to do something about this
00:36:46
situation. But to
00:36:48
somehow change it is of course
00:36:50
possible there some processes as a
00:36:53
result of which the
00:36:54
establishment of this subjectivity pushed but without
00:36:57
stopping it without us
00:36:59
somehow taking upon ourselves Well, really,
00:37:01
as you correctly say, some kind of
00:37:02
collective responsibility for our
00:37:03
own country, then this is an important
00:37:05
point for actually actually
00:37:07
Before I use it exactly in this sense
00:37:08
yes yes yes yes I just I
00:37:11
just specifically emphasize this yes it’s
00:37:13
not not first of all not a
00:37:16
responsibility to others but to
00:37:18
yourself if you start
00:37:20
to answer to yourself yes after that you can
00:37:21
say you know, as if I was
00:37:23
wrong here, let’s figure it out here, I
00:37:26
hope that this moment will come and of course at
00:37:29
this moment it will be obvious that the heads
00:37:32
of responsibility are to
00:37:34
themselves, that there is responsibility for
00:37:37
some crazy decisions that
00:37:39
one person made, by and large,
00:37:41
should he bears it himself and we must bear
00:37:44
responsibility to ourselves that
00:37:47
we are somehow a situation in which
00:37:51
one does
00:37:55
not return this to our
00:37:58
prostrate
00:38:00
subjectivity in your
00:38:02
opinion no of course, but this is, well, it’s like a
00:38:07
signal in this
00:38:10
direction you see I somehow too Apparently
00:38:12
this is how
00:38:25
Russia expresses itself very big, we
00:38:28
saw it in the first year when Alexey,
00:38:30
whom we were talking about, returned to the country and
00:38:33
in the country there were, well, record-breaking in scale
00:38:35
and in geography, by the way, also
00:38:37
a protest and we actually see this in
00:38:41
everything since the beginning of the war that in
00:38:44
Russia there are a huge number of people. Well, that is,
00:38:48
probably millions or maybe
00:38:49
tens of millions of people who are
00:38:52
looking for an opportunity for some kind of
00:38:53
collective action simply sit down,
00:38:57
so even when such a
00:38:59
minimal opportunity appears. Moreover, it is also
00:39:02
legal in these conditions, of course
00:39:05
people immediately begin
00:39:06
to look for some kind of minimal outlet for
00:39:10
this accumulated potential,
00:39:13
without even particularly pinning great hopes on it,
00:39:15
so history with these queues
00:39:18
just seems to me to show me and I
00:39:21
think to all
00:39:23
observers the
00:39:25
potential for collective action. As
00:39:27
soon as the opportunity for it is
00:39:28
open, we are very We are likely to see
00:39:31
how people pour into
00:39:33
politics. If we talk about the protests of
00:39:35
recent times, we literally
00:39:37
watched protests in Bashkortostan for 2 weeks in a row,
00:39:38
then protests in Yakutsk, and
00:39:42
among other things, the wives of those mobilized
00:39:44
every week, every Saturday, go to the
00:39:46
Ministry of Defense and other buildings in Moscow and
00:39:49
try to hold their pickets Well, as
00:39:52
you already said, there is a queue of hopes for this. This is an
00:39:55
example of collective action.
00:39:57
Based on this, which protests have more
00:40:00
protest potential, those
00:40:02
on the national stage or those
00:40:04
on the
00:40:05
political stage with protest potential? In
00:40:08
this case, I understand the readiness of people to
00:40:10
fundamentally participate in political
00:40:13
life
00:40:16
means that with regard to these episodes
00:40:18
that you say,
00:40:25
if there are no short-term prospects, I don’t
00:40:27
see any problems for the Kremlin
00:40:30
in any of these phenomena that you
00:40:33
described, but at the same time, of course,
00:40:37
well, you can see that
00:40:41
some trends are getting worse
00:40:45
which may play out in the future Yes, but
00:40:48
if we are talking about regional
00:40:50
protests there, then of course in Russia
00:40:53
real federalization is overdue and overripe there in
00:40:56
Moscow. Everyone hates everyone, everyone thinks what
00:40:59
federal officials are doing is tyranny,
00:41:02
for now it’s just a request
00:41:04
for, well, more independence,
00:41:08
control over one’s own land Of course,
00:41:10
if it is restrained
00:41:12
and suppressed for some time, it will turn into real
00:41:14
separatism in conditions when the Imperial
00:41:16
project collapses, this will be especially
00:41:18
dangerous because at this moment the
00:41:20
greatest Temptation will appear for some of the
00:41:23
people who live in Russia to
00:41:25
say, Listen, and we, in general, are like us
00:41:27
no one asked If you remember, you
00:41:30
also once conquered us, they also didn’t
00:41:32
ask us and You know, somehow you went here, you
00:41:35
sort it all out yourself, these
00:41:37
moods will certainly appear, they
00:41:40
are not yet dominant in any form, but to
00:41:42
some extent
00:41:43
serious in Russia, but in the conditions of
00:41:46
large centrifugal forces there, they can
00:41:48
begin to play in this sense, of course
00:41:50
Putin is tightening the screws which will then
00:41:53
fall apart
00:41:54
consequences question
00:41:57
six months ago Grigory Borisovich writes
00:41:59
our viewer said that all the options for
00:42:01
the development of events that he sees are bad,
00:42:03
this has not
00:42:05
changed
00:42:06
No from the point of view there, from the point of view of
00:42:10
Russia, I see I don’t see any good
00:42:13
options, another thing is that then again there are
00:42:16
options in which
00:42:18
we still take the country into our own hands and
00:42:21
cope with these difficulties, we
00:42:23
can
00:42:25
cope with them,
00:42:26
there are things that Well, give
00:42:30
reason to see Well there possibility
00:42:34
It is possible to cope with this, there are
00:42:36
prerequisites for this, yes, after all, in
00:42:40
Russia Well, it’s more of a gerontocracy Elite
00:42:43
Yes, to make it clear, I don’t mean
00:42:45
strictly age. I mean some kind of
00:42:49
deep moral obsolescence, that is, there are large young
00:42:52
layers who are in in general, they were ripe a
00:42:55
long time ago in order to take the country
00:42:57
into their own hands. The country has Well, we are
00:43:01
not talking about what is obvious in the case
00:43:03
of Russia, that there is a very large human
00:43:05
potential, but there are also a number of prerequisites
00:43:09
for
00:43:14
quickly building some kind of economic
00:43:17
growth for everyone, yes, there are some
00:43:20
working institutions, there are some
00:43:22
fairly obvious opportunities, like
00:43:24
infrastructure reforms that
00:43:26
will make the country more connected. Just within
00:43:29
itself. So that all issues are not resolved
00:43:30
through Moscow. Of course, that is what
00:43:34
makes Russia an important player today in the
00:43:37
global world and these are not
00:43:40
crazy attempts to defeat Eastern
00:43:42
Europe. But the resources that Russia has
00:43:45
to say a weighty word in
00:43:47
solving global problems. Well, for example,
00:43:49
there are problems with the energy transition. Yes, I
00:43:52
mean there are Russian
00:43:55
Zen resources.
00:43:58
All this gives some prerequisites
00:44:01
for You can
00:44:04
somehow get out of this tailspin, it will be hard, that is, you don’t
00:44:07
need to think that everything will somehow
00:44:10
get better on its own, it
00:44:13
will be hard, but this is at least
00:44:15
a scenario in which
00:44:16
we take our country into our hands and begin to
00:44:19
take responsibility for it if this does not happen Well, that
00:44:22
means there will be bad scenarios, but I
00:44:24
understand correctly that the scenario
00:44:26
that you just described is the best of the
00:44:28
conditional
00:44:30
bad ones. Yes,
00:44:32
well, these are like scenarios in the end with a good
00:44:34
ending because we are still starting to
00:44:36
ultimately rule our own
00:44:37
country through difficulties through a
00:44:42
painful transformation there, especially
00:44:44
once again considering that the world today is going
00:44:46
through a difficult transformation, but we
00:44:48
find our place in it, this place
00:44:50
must be worthy, Russia certainly
00:44:53
should and can be a player in solving
00:44:57
global problems, but we will go
00:44:59
through some difficult period, eventually
00:45:03
having received having received our own country,
00:45:06
this can be considered such a difficult
00:45:09
epic with a successful outcome. Well, in
00:45:13
general, of course, the acquisition of the acquisition of
00:45:16
subjectivity is what we
00:45:18
ultimately deserve, I think, I would like,
00:45:20
of course, to gain it earlier, but it is possible
00:45:23
In order to to find, we need to go through
00:45:25
exactly the path that we are now
00:45:27
going through Gregory Thank you very much, you are
00:45:28
not a frequent guest with us, but one way or another I
00:45:31
hope that next time you will
00:45:34
accept our offer again and
00:45:36
agree to go on air with us, just like
00:45:38
today on our Sociologist
00:45:40
Grigory Yudin was in touch Thank you for the invitation
00:45:42
Thank you I was still in touch on the air My
00:45:46
name is Rina alman You were those who
00:45:48
watched us online and you will be those
00:45:50
who watch us in the recordings and those you
00:45:54
who watch online and those you
00:45:56
who Watch the recordings like
00:45:58
this broadcast, it only gets
00:45:59
better; more viewers see it; write
00:46:02
comments; support us in the
00:46:04
ways that are convenient for you; in particular,
00:46:07
we have a patreon; in order to start
00:46:10
supporting us there, just
00:46:12
point the camera of your smartphone at the QR
00:46:14
code that you see at the bottom of the screen;
00:46:15
go to select the site Honestly,
00:46:19
and after you become a patron you will
00:46:21
see your name, your nickname, any
00:46:23
information that you provide about yourself to
00:46:26
the line, it runs here in the mornings and
00:46:28
evenings. And of course, become a
00:46:30
sponsor of the channel popular politics,
00:46:32
if, again, this is available to you,
00:46:35
appropriate and safe or give this
00:46:37
sponsorship, this is an option that is
00:46:39
available to our viewers abroad
00:46:42
within Russia. Unfortunately, it is not
00:46:44
available, but you can receive it as a gift.
00:46:46
And to receive it as a gift, you need to
00:46:48
make a beautiful, impeccable I would
00:46:50
say logical chain and there is
00:46:53
another way to support us these are
00:46:56
gifs. For example, Denis Stukalov
00:46:58
sent a gif for 20 euros,
00:47:00
which I think will decorate our broadcast
00:47:03
if our director brings it out perfectly. And
00:47:06
if he doesn’t show it, then you just know that it
00:47:09
was there. I say goodbye to you until the next
00:47:11
broadcast. Stay popular politics.
00:47:13
There will be a lot more
00:47:14
interesting things today. one Boyka What is it worth in
00:47:16
general it can’t be missed yet

Description:

В гостях «Честного слова» — социолог и философ Григорий Юдин. Как всегда, обсуждаем главные новости последних дней. Задавайте свои вопросы в чате! Гость: Григорий Юдин https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Ведущая: Ирина Аллеман https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ⚡️ Кампания ФБК против Путина-2024: https://neputin.org/ ❗️Этот бот поможет переубедить тех, кто верит Владимиру Путину. Присоединяйтесь! https://t.me/neputin_bot Слушайте нас в формате подкастов: https://band.link/PopularPolitics Покупайте мерч Команды Навального: https://navalny.shop/ Важные ссылки: ❗️ Сайт кампании «Свободу Навальному» (из России через VPN): https://free.navalny.com/ 🔹 Бот «Напиши политзеку»: https://t.me/politzekam_bot 🔹 Штабы Навального. Защищенная платформа для активистов в России: https://shtab.navalny.com/ 🔹 Наш проект «Цены сегодня». Смотрите, как менялась стоимость товаров после начала войны: https://pricing.day/ 🔹 Бот команды Навального: https://t.me/teamnavalny_bot Поддержите нашу работу! 🔸 Наш Patreon, где вы можете поддержать любимую передачу:  https://www.patreon.com/Popularpolitics 🔸 Станьте спонсором канала, и вы получите доступ к эксклюзивным бонусам. Подробнее: https://www.youtube.com/c/Popularpolitics/join 🔸 Поддержать штабы Навального: https://www.patreon.com/shtab_navalny 🔸 Поддержите работу ФБК: https://donate.acf.international/ru Подпишитесь: ➖ Телеграм: t.me/politica_media ➖ Инстаграм: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ➖ Твиттер: https://twitter.com/politica_media ➖ Помощь юристов и ответы на главные вопросы о мобилизации. Наш телеграм-канал: https://t.me/mobilizationnews ➖ Новости без цензуры: телеграм-канал «Сирена» https://t.me/news_sirena Таймкоды 00:00 Начало 00:50 Григория внесли в список иноагентов 04:12 Поддерживают ли россияне войну? 06:37 Россияне привыкли к войне? 09:46 Про демократию в России 15:10 Как путинская идеология породила ресентимент? 19:16 Какая политическая система в России? 25:22 Насколько военизировано российское общество? 28:47 Почему часть россиян одобряет войну? 33:22 Как поменялось отношение россиян к вопросам вины и ответственности? 37:55 Про Бориса Надеждина 39:35 У каких протестов большой потенциал? 41:55 Есть ли положительный вариант развития событий в России?

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Юдин про настроения россиян, последствия войны и монархию Путина 🎙 Честное слово с Григорием Юдиным"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.