Download "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FC0t0zzKSq9A%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FoeJhqn6H7kY%252Fhqdefault.jpg%253Fv%253D6602f8ad&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252Frn10mqHc7sM%252Fsddefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
![Формировка низкорослых томатов в ОГ от "А" до "Я". [Наглядно]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Funidownloader.com%2FcontentImages%2Fh9VbpKKNdtJYVDchsV8bAKl4fEw%3D%2Ffilters%3Aquality(80)%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FxTITxSMlSoE%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
Russian
00:00:08
I Greetings to all our viewers00:00:12
who joined us today and00:00:15
I also welcome all those who will00:00:17
watch us offline And if you are here then00:00:20
it means you are interested00:00:22
the question of the existence of God you00:00:23
interested in Is there a God and this is our topic00:00:27
lectures I will review a number00:00:30
arguments about God My name is Vladimir a00:00:35
and I'll say a few words about myself and I myself00:00:39
graduated from the Mining Academy00:00:42
Academy in Krakow A and received00:00:45
engineering degree energy engineering degree00:00:48
master's degree in energy sector And I came00:00:52
to Christ watching the Kenta Hovind debate00:00:55
then I saw that in these debates with00:00:58
evolutionist he showed the biblical00:01:00
creation he indicated that a00:01:03
biblical creation the Bible is intelligent00:01:07
and this can be defended and then so am I00:01:10
believed and came to Christ And after that00:01:13
how I believed I founded the ministry00:01:15
which is called biblical apologetics00:01:17
our website bible.com We are also at00:01:20
social networks telegram Facebook00:01:23
VKontakte on tube just write00:01:25
apologetics of the bible and you will find us a00:01:28
some of those debates I translated we00:01:31
voiced them and they are on our channel00:01:35
on YouTube in particular Kent's debates00:01:38
Joven and Michael Shermer famous atheist00:01:42
So some say someone said00:01:45
there are two possibilities: God either exists00:01:47
or it’s not there and both are equally scary00:01:50
you see if God exists then that means00:01:53
that one day we will meet him and give00:01:56
report for everything we said, thought and00:01:58
done on the other hand if there is no God00:02:02
then we are moving at great speed in00:02:04
space and no one is for it00:02:06
replies Indeed, this is the thought that00:02:09
requires our understanding, you see00:02:13
every worldview tries to answer00:02:14
to three fundamental questions: who am I?00:02:17
where am I from and what will happen to me if God00:02:20
that is, I am the totality of soul and body00:02:23
created in the image and likeness of God00:02:26
if where am I from I was created by God and what00:02:30
will be with me One day I will meet with00:02:32
creator if there is no God then uh I mean00:02:37
just a complex collection of proteins00:02:39
compounds a and i emerged from protoplasm00:02:42
washed ashore 4.3 billion years ago00:02:44
back what will happen to me after death00:02:48
I will cease to exist00:02:50
Aa As we see PS of the existence of God he00:02:54
fundamental is uh through the prism of that00:02:57
if God we look at ourselves he00:03:00
defines us it also defines the world in00:03:04
where we live we look at the world00:03:07
it's completely different if we think that00:03:09
There is no God or if we think that God exists00:03:13
So speaking about the nature of the world Imagine00:03:16
imagine that you are sick and are going to00:03:19
to the doctor and the first thing the doctor will do when you00:03:23
come to him He will send you to00:03:25
diagnostics He will take your tests00:03:28
check blood sugar level check00:03:32
your blood pressure, any other tests00:03:35
will conduct That is, he will try to find00:03:37
the cause of your illness00:03:39
uh and here uh even if it doesn’t work out00:03:44
to find the cause of the disease is assumed00:03:46
that it still exists and here we are00:03:49
we are faced with what else is called00:03:52
law of cause and effect00:03:54
those things with which we have00:03:57
we face in the world there must be some00:03:58
the reason there is no such thing as something00:04:01
No00:04:02
reasons an interesting example is the discovery00:04:05
one of the planets so scientists observed00:04:09
uranium Here is a photo of it in infrared00:04:12
light and observing uranium they spent00:04:16
calculations in my opinion It was William Herschel00:04:19
who carried out the calculations or leverage00:04:20
in my opinion it was the lever that held00:04:22
calculations and he determined that according to calculations00:04:26
Uranus must be certain00:04:28
trajectory But it turned out that the observation00:04:31
does not correspond to the calculations then they00:04:33
started looking for the reason why00:04:36
this can happen and as a result the lever00:04:38
in his calculations he showed what should be00:04:40
some other celestial body that00:04:44
rejects Uranus, that's why Po explained it00:04:47
for what reason does Uranus deviate in the end?00:04:49
this is how Neptune was discovered, that is, again00:04:51
science is looking for the reason00:04:53
cause and effect relationships all science00:04:55
is based on cause-and-effect relationships00:04:57
This00:04:58
fundamental fundamental property00:05:00
our world fundamental law00:05:02
nature and it is so fundamental and we are in00:05:05
he is so confident that we, for example, are not00:05:08
we think it will suddenly appear for no reason00:05:11
rhinoceros in our room we never do that00:05:13
we don’t even think so, just like you00:05:15
never imagine what and or00:05:18
don't worry about what if you suddenly00:05:21
go for a swim in the bathroom then suddenly00:05:24
a crocodile or shark will appear for no reason00:05:28
and bite your leg off. That is, this is the most00:05:31
fundamental law of nature So uh00:05:34
because this is a fundamental law00:05:36
nature we can in principle00:05:37
formulate the first thesis of everything00:05:40
began to be00:05:42
reason Now suppose that you00:05:45
are you walking somewhere along the road or are you walking00:05:49
somewhere at work and you see a cup00:05:53
standing with hot coffee and someone to you00:05:56
says this cup of hot coffee left00:05:58
been left for 2 years and it’s obvious that this is00:06:02
absurd we know that heat transfers from00:06:04
hot objects to cold ones and we know00:06:08
that it takes a certain amount of time00:06:11
the balance will be established until it is established00:06:13
some kind of balance of temperature and that is, we00:06:17
We understand that everything strives for balance00:06:19
with the environment we know that it is warm00:06:22
goes from hot to cold until00:06:24
until there is equilibrium If you00:06:26
leave your car on the street and don't be afraid00:06:29
follow her then in 15 years she will00:06:31
look something like this, that is, you can00:06:33
to say that she comes into balance with00:06:35
environment from order to chaos00:06:38
over time the machine will be destroyed we00:06:41
we know that her paint will be awesome we know00:06:44
that it will rot and rust and00:06:47
collapse after 50 years the desire for00:06:51
state of absolute00:06:53
equilibrium minimum minimum00:06:56
organization of maximum chaos She00:06:57
it will probably look something like this00:07:00
and besides, we know that all ours00:07:04
objects your washing machine and your00:07:07
microwave If you have and or your00:07:10
iron they will all break over time00:07:13
there are all of them will wear out00:07:15
to collapse gradually and that is why00:07:17
you will have to call a specialist who00:07:19
will fix yours00:07:21
uh your home gadgets if this00:07:25
will be required So uh this is what we00:07:27
call it the second law of thermodynamics00:07:29
precisely thanks to this second law00:07:31
many of you have thermodynamics00:07:33
work today and the second law00:07:36
thermodynamics also applies to living things00:07:38
organisms Here you are at 90 and here you are at Here you are00:07:42
at 19 and here you are at 90 we gradually00:07:45
we destroy we do not become better Ours00:07:48
the body wears out, collapses, appears00:07:50
we are not becoming more and more mutations00:07:54
better and One day the moment will come when we00:07:57
we will lose the fight against the second law00:07:59
the speakers of our systems will no longer be00:08:01
capable of restoring uh some00:08:03
damage in our DNA and ultimately in that00:08:07
moment for us will dig a hole in the ground, oh yours00:08:10
the body will lower there and you will gradually00:08:13
strive for a state of absolute00:08:15
balance with the environment00:08:18
and the Bible says dust you are and unto dust00:08:21
you'll come back and end up in your place00:08:25
put a stone like this There will be two00:08:28
dates and the dash between them is the dash00:08:32
your life has flown by and what have you00:08:35
waste your life think about it00:08:38
I like this song Our Life00:08:40
short words on birds flying and faster00:08:42
the shuttle flies forward can we see00:08:45
we won't take anything with us after death00:08:49
Let's leave everything here, we earned a lot00:08:52
we had money, we are famous, whatever we are00:08:55
did everything stay here think about00:08:58
this So00:09:00
the second law of thermodynamics can be00:09:01
formulate as follows in all00:09:03
observed systems have a common00:09:05
natural tendency to distribute00:09:07
decay and dissipation of energy00:09:09
necessary for further00:09:10
transformations law of increasing entropy00:09:13
entropy is the world of chaos, that is, what00:09:15
the more chaos the more entropy Isaac00:09:18
Kazimov offers the following definition00:09:20
he says the universe is constantly00:09:21
it gets chaotic if you look00:09:23
to the second law tedi law from such a point00:09:26
sight we recognize ourselves in it we diligently00:09:30
we are working hard to tidy up the room but00:09:32
Leave her unattended and she will become00:09:34
dusty and dirty that is what we are dealing with00:09:37
with the second law He continues further00:09:39
how hard it is to keep your home in order00:09:42
equipment and our own bodies How00:09:44
they easily become unusable00:09:46
in fact we can't do anything about it00:09:48
everything wears out on its own00:09:50
breaks spoils that's what the second law is about00:09:52
And another example is Dr. Mikhail00:09:55
Palkin chief engineer of the laboratory00:09:57
NASA jet propulsion he wrote00:10:00
popular textbook on thermodynamics00:10:02
when I was at university I really liked00:10:06
helped and written in very simple language00:10:09
writes it is possible that you remember When you00:10:11
bought yourself a new table or you can00:10:13
is to imagine you putting everything on it00:10:15
necessary documents and little things everything looks00:10:17
great and decent00:10:19
a However, if you are like other people00:10:23
then things on the table gradually begin00:10:25
pile up until the whole table00:10:27
will not be covered in books with candy wrappers00:10:31
self-feeding Yes, we are dealing with one of00:10:34
aspects of entropy what began00:10:36
order naturally becomes00:10:38
disorderly imagine in this00:10:40
context of the universe as it ages00:10:42
The universe becomes00:10:47
disorder is destroyed We are it00:10:49
we know she couldn't exist that's why00:10:51
think about it forever stars00:10:53
explode and appear like this00:10:55
blood nebula bottom nebula one of00:10:57
such examples One of such examples is us00:10:59
We also know that the planets are gradually00:11:02
are cooling down, that is, it is impossible to cool down00:11:04
forever that is also if if00:11:08
The universe was eternal then it was all a long time ago00:11:10
would have fallen apart and you and I wouldn’t be here00:11:12
was that is, but we are seeing today00:11:15
In galaxies we observe an accumulation of matter00:11:17
with empty spaces between them00:11:21
says that the Universe which00:11:23
gradually disintegrating She could not00:11:25
disintegrate00:11:27
forever hanging puts it very well00:11:31
He says today few people from cosmoloto00:11:33
doubts that the Universe is00:11:35
at least in the form in which we00:11:37
we know it really arose in00:11:39
some finite moment in the past00:11:41
alternative option that the Universe00:11:42
has always existed in one form or another00:11:44
comes across Pretty simple00:11:46
Paradox: the sun and stars cannot burn00:11:48
forever sooner or later they will run out00:11:50
fuel and they will die the same00:11:52
applies to all irreversible00:11:54
energy supply for physical processes00:11:56
available in the Universe for them for their00:11:58
flow00:12:00
is finite and cannot and cannot last00:12:03
forever, that is, then he continues This00:12:06
example of the so-called second law00:12:08
thermodynamics which which being00:12:11
applied to the entire cosmos predicts00:12:13
that he's stuck on a one way path to00:12:15
degeneration and decay00:12:17
state of maximum entropy or00:12:20
mess because it's finite00:12:22
the state has not yet caught up with this follows00:12:24
that the universe cannot exist00:12:27
long that is, this way we can00:12:29
know that the universe cannot00:12:31
it must exist for a long time00:12:33
Start00:12:36
but not only that, probably We are all00:12:40
ran into you at school somewhere00:12:43
I don’t remember exactly which class00:12:46
it was but we encountered these00:12:49
equations We talked about the fact that we00:12:52
solved a certain equation and drew00:12:54
These are the graphs. We talked about the fact that00:12:58
here is a hyperbole it extends from minus00:13:02
infinity to plus infinity or00:13:04
We talked about an infinite interval00:13:06
the interval from some number there to00:13:09
infinity the question arises00:13:11
Is there a What is something like this in00:13:14
the real world The thing is that throughout00:13:16
visibility of the present in the real world is not00:13:20
exists00:13:22
infinity, that is, we are talking here about00:13:24
that when we solve such examples and00:13:26
are we talking about infinity or are we00:13:28
we're talking about some kind of subtraction plus00:13:30
infinity minus infinity then we00:13:33
we are talking about the so-called potential00:13:34
infinity, that is, we are talking about00:13:36
something that is abstract something that is00:13:39
it exists in the abstraction, that's what it is in00:13:41
in the same sense in which it exists00:13:44
let's take any00:13:45
Stephen King or any other author00:13:48
That is, she is something00:13:51
abstract why is this so imagine00:13:54
imagine the following imagine a hotel with00:13:56
an infinite number of rooms So in00:13:59
this hotel has an endless number of rooms00:14:01
This means that there is infinity in it00:14:04
number of both even and odd00:14:05
numbers Well, that's clear. Now00:14:08
Imagine leaving the hotel00:14:10
all visitors of odd numbers So00:14:13
we are an infinite number of people00:14:16
full the hotel is completely full there00:14:18
an infinite number of people live here too00:14:20
uh, someone asks everyone to leave00:14:24
visitors of all odd numbers Question00:14:26
how many people left because00:14:30
an infinite number of numbers00:14:32
there is an infinite number of even00:14:36
even numbered rooms then the endless leaves00:14:39
quantity00:14:40
people But all the odd ones remain but in00:14:44
infinity of odd numbers too00:14:46
an infinite number As a result there arises00:14:48
absurd because it leaves you00:14:50
an infinite number of people remain00:14:52
an infinite number of people and the like00:14:56
the absurdity of dealing with infinity is very00:14:58
this tells us a lot that00:15:01
infinity in the real in the real world00:15:03
this one cannot exist at all00:15:06
the hotel we talked about is also00:15:07
they call it Gilbert's Hotel And it was like this00:15:10
scientist David Gilbert and he formulated00:15:14
These are examples and he wrote that00:15:16
the infinite is nowhere to be found in00:15:17
in reality it does not exist in nature and00:15:21
does not provide a legal basis for00:15:23
rational thinking role which00:15:25
remains to be played by the infinite - this00:15:27
exclusively the role of ideas00:15:29
So we come to the conclusion that the Universe00:15:32
the universe must have a beginning we know00:15:35
that the universe cannot decay forever00:15:37
because the universe is still not destroyed00:15:39
and we know that it is being destroyed.00:15:41
says that if we return to00:15:43
the past that at the beginning she has to00:15:46
be the beginning because it is impossible00:15:48
collapse forever also we know that00:15:50
infinity itself00:15:52
It leads to absurdity. This suggests that00:15:55
what if the universe was infinite then00:15:59
Until now it would have passed00:16:02
an infinite number of seconds or minutes00:16:04
or hours at00:16:06
As a result, if the Universe is eternal then00:16:10
an infinite number of hours would have passed00:16:13
then we would meet all those00:16:16
absurdities that take place when00:16:19
thinking about infinity, which is also00:16:22
tells us rather that the Universe00:16:24
the universe could not be eternal00:16:27
have a beginning Therefore the Universe00:16:30
there is a reason, it is a logical consequence00:16:32
from here So this reason should00:16:35
to be outside of time, that is, outside00:16:38
space and beyond matter, beyond time00:16:41
that is, everything that is outside is eternal00:16:42
time is eternal also reason00:16:45
must be out of space and00:16:46
matter because it gave birth00:16:48
space and matter and this is us and00:16:50
call it supernatural that is00:16:53
what comes in is outside00:16:54
natural world reason could not be00:16:57
matter because otherwise matter00:16:58
would spoil the matter, which is also00:17:00
it's a contradiction to be absurd00:17:02
maybe in the end we only have one left00:17:06
a reasonable option is that finding the reason00:17:08
is beyond time00:17:10
space and matter In addition, if00:17:13
we will look at our even solar00:17:16
system then we know that Yes we have00:17:18
the sun and a number of planets and the sun itself00:17:20
produces 44 quadrillion energy for itself00:17:23
per year is a lot, but for comparison00:17:26
large power plant produces 1 billion00:17:29
t per year That is, in the end the sun00:17:31
produces the same amount as 44 million00:17:35
power plants This is colossal00:17:37
amount of energy moreover Our00:17:39
The Sun is not yet the biggest Our Sun00:17:42
- this is a yellow car compared to it00:17:44
the stars are much bigger than it00:17:47
producing much more energy and00:17:49
containing much more energy00:17:51
here is Canis Major, the largest known00:17:54
star to us the Sun in comparison with it00:17:57
not even a point to see the sun00:17:59
you need to increase it like this00:18:02
So in the Universe this tells us everything about00:18:05
that the Universe in which we live is00:18:08
includes a huge amount00:18:10
energy and matter come out somehow00:18:13
yard And somewhere outside the city and00:18:16
look at all these stars all these00:18:18
stars are distant galaxies that00:18:22
the light of which reaches us today and00:18:25
they contain colossal00:18:27
the total amount of energy that exists is 20000:18:30
sextillion stars is the number that00:18:33
just no00:18:35
mind-blowing But that says it all00:18:38
what is the reason that could give rise to00:18:41
something like that must have that much power00:18:44
which is simply unthinkable to us, we are simply00:18:47
we can't even imagine what it is00:18:48
for the power this reason must have00:18:50
Universe, that is, we can say that00:18:53
Prina has colossal mine that is00:18:55
in fact she00:18:57
omnipotent00:18:59
talk but the question arises00:19:03
we know that as long as it exists00:19:06
cause exists and effect well00:19:07
for example, as long as it is low00:19:09
there is a temperature in some area00:19:12
there will be water in this area for example00:19:14
be in a frozen state How00:19:16
low temperature only00:19:19
will be excluded then the water will melt but00:19:25
if we know that the universe has a reason00:19:27
then the reason is outside00:19:30
time and space and matter a00:19:31
because it is eternal00:19:33
definition of the word forever is00:19:35
outside of time then if00:19:37
the eternal reason why then the universe does not00:19:40
eternal because this is a reasonable consequence00:19:42
which should be produced here too00:19:45
we have the only healthy one left00:19:47
option that tells us that00:19:49
reason must choose to create the universe00:19:52
if something can choose to create00:19:56
the universe00:19:57
That00:19:59
to be a mind, that is, only a reasonable Agent00:20:02
A reasonable person can choose So we00:20:05
we come to the conclusion that00:20:07
the reason for the universe is outside of time00:20:09
outside of space outside of matter is00:20:12
supernatural eternal is00:20:14
omnipotent and reasonable this is00:20:18
God skeptics ask if everything00:20:21
there is a reason who created it00:20:22
God they say that See your argument00:20:25
we you say that everything has a reason00:20:28
but therefore God must have a reason00:20:30
also but the thing is that we don't talk00:20:32
that everything happens for a reason we say that00:20:34
everything that comes into being has a reason00:20:36
there we are dealing with the cause and00:20:39
consequence that is the cause if there is00:20:41
there must be a consequence and a reason for this00:20:43
there cannot but be reasons. So the question is who00:20:45
created God doesn't really have00:20:48
meaning it's the same as if someone00:20:50
asked who is over the Bachelor or00:20:52
how many sides does a square circle have?00:20:55
there is this is nonsense because00:20:58
is eternal in00:21:00
definition So we have two options00:21:02
either the universe has a reason or it does00:21:05
The Universe has no reason If the Universe00:21:07
there's no reason what we're facing is what00:21:09
then what is the answer to the origin00:21:11
Universe we will have this means that00:21:14
The universe came from nothing and uh00:21:17
skeptics say so, they are materialists00:21:19
they say that the universe came from nothing00:21:21
through nothing and thanks to nothing00:21:24
This is Quentin Smith at the Ul debate00:21:27
William Lane Craig said or so00:21:30
an interesting example is Discover magazine00:21:32
The universe exploded into something00:21:34
absolutely nothing zero emptiness And at that00:21:37
as she grew she filled everything00:21:38
a large amount of material that00:21:40
came out of absolutely nowhere How00:21:42
is it possible to ask ala na Guta him00:21:44
theory explains00:21:47
everything when I read when I read this00:21:49
I have a question: is it them?00:21:52
Are they writing seriously or is this some kind of joke00:21:56
April Joke maybe, come on00:21:58
Let's listen to what a famous atheist says00:22:01
Richard Dons we will be with him today00:22:03
meet repeatedly and here's the next one00:22:06
fragment of the following video is00:22:09
fragment of his dispute with one famous00:22:13
person00:22:15
and and this debate I think will show us00:22:20
something00:22:22
interesting, kind and helpful, answer the question00:22:27
and world-famous evolutionary biologist00:22:30
and author of The God Delusion, Richard00:22:32
Dons So we have a video question from00:22:35
Andrew Watson from Brno State00:22:40
Victoria question for Richard Dawkins00:22:43
Big Bang apologists believe that00:22:45
at the beginning there was nothing then suddenly poof00:22:48
and the Universe arose from the big00:22:51
explosion if I have nothing in00:22:55
palms and I will clench my fist00:22:59
I'll say00:23:00
Beng then open your palm again in it00:23:04
still nothing00:23:06
will I ask you to explain in simple00:23:09
tongue like something as huge as00:23:12
the universe came out of nothing Richard00:23:21
ons Well obviously you don't00:23:27
physicist00:23:30
like me, but I’m happy to note that00:23:34
being in Australia I will take part in00:23:37
several conversations in public conversations with00:23:40
my colleague Lorenz Crowsom in that00:23:42
including at the Sydney Opera House00:23:45
I guess next week Lawrence00:23:48
wrote a book just on this topic as00:23:50
we can get something out of nothing we will00:23:53
This00:23:54
discuss the idea itself00:23:57
contradicts00:23:59
Of course common sense rejects it00:24:01
That's why she's interesting00:24:04
that allows the Universe to arise in00:24:07
basically something quite mysterious00:24:09
should lie at the origins of development00:24:11
Universe If you want to replace00:24:14
replace the physical explanation with a reasonable one00:24:18
You won't get anywhere by interfering00:24:22
this complicates the problem, scientists are trying00:24:25
explain how it is possible for a problem to arise00:24:28
but the incredible complexity of the world of the universe00:24:31
and life and they are in this regard00:24:38
have succeeded in painting the structure of life already00:24:41
pieced together, this is thanks to Darwin00:24:43
and his followers, physicists are still working00:24:46
over the question of origin00:24:49
Universe among them and Lawrence Krauss00:24:52
whom I will have a meeting at00:24:54
next week upon occurrence00:24:57
there's a mystery in the universe, it's extremely00:25:00
deep interesting question, please allow me00:25:03
interrupt this is an old question very old00:25:06
13th century famy queens asked the same question00:25:08
he replied there must have been a period when00:25:10
there were no physical00:25:12
substances but something cannot arise00:25:15
out of nothing this is his look he paraphrases00:25:17
can come out of nothing and that's what00:25:20
physicists tell us today you asked00:25:22
give me the answer in simple words00:25:25
there will be a very, very simple answer If00:25:28
you will combine matter and antimatter00:25:31
will happen00:25:43
interconnection theory is still under development00:25:46
this is a very complex mathematical theory00:25:49
theory to answer such questions is not00:25:51
my competence but I'm sure that00:25:53
no problem00:25:55
the assumptions of a higher mind will be decided by creating00:25:59
but will only raise questions about him00:26:04
appearance is anything but00:26:06
answer George00:26:09
Thank you The trouble is the trouble is00:26:13
ideas00:26:15
He simplifies Richard to the point of absurdity00:26:19
God is exalted00:26:24
[applause]00:26:28
wearily speaks of God as if he were some kind of00:26:30
supreme entity in space and time00:26:35
while from 450-500 years BC00:26:38
era in the understanding of Greek philosophers God00:26:41
was outside of space and00:26:43
time god is inevitable self-sufficient00:26:46
informed is absolute and this is the hypothesis with00:26:49
which you have to fight further00:26:53
Kraus does not claim that it is big00:26:55
explosion came out of nowhere00:27:00
and then somewhere in the last six00:27:03
pages of his book He00:27:07
admits that I don’t know if Richard read it00:27:10
at least he wrote the foreword00:27:12
Kraus says what what what Richard00:27:16
describes something as a cocktail of particles and00:27:20
possibly vacuum as well00:27:22
electromagnetic00:27:27
what does Kraus mean by00:27:30
nothing there is an excellent review of it00:27:33
a book in New York City and this is far from00:27:36
religious newspaper and Lawrence was00:27:41
fully00:27:43
rejected and00:27:45
especially refuted00:27:48
by the way it's his00:27:50
supporters who now disagree with him00:27:53
with an idea you can answer this right away00:27:57
burn out under nothing in any case00:28:00
this is something very00:28:01
simple what's in it00:28:05
funny Well I think it's pretty funny00:28:08
try to determine00:28:12
nothing Yes really quite a blockage on00:28:16
trying to define nothing00:28:18
Aristotle offers us this00:28:19
definition of nothing is what one thinks about00:28:21
stones, that is, we are talking about what is not00:28:25
there was nothing at all, that is, absent00:28:28
absence of something This is nothing If00:28:31
you have laws of nature If you have00:28:33
there is Gravity then the question arises00:28:35
where did it come from, that is, atheism or00:28:40
materialism collides here with00:28:42
serious problem and they also wrote00:28:45
another scientist in the journal New Sci He00:28:48
speaks explaining How it all started we00:28:50
We are faced with a very significant00:28:51
problem you won't be able to reset it00:28:53
appealing to quantum mechanics this is exactly00:28:55
what Ren Kraus does is what he said00:28:58
Richard Dawkin is now in this fragment00:29:01
dispute trying to define nothing at all00:29:04
even the idea that something happened From00:29:07
nothing this is well, well, absurd either at the beginning00:29:10
there is nothing What do you mean there is no quantum00:29:13
vacuum neither to geometric dust nor00:29:15
time in which something could00:29:17
happen neither the laws of physics that00:29:18
could make changes from nothing into00:29:21
something or something exists and it00:29:23
requires00:29:25
explanations So the Universe came from nothing00:29:28
violates the law of cause and effect00:29:29
connections are absolutely00:29:33
irrationally you violate the most basic00:29:35
the law of nature that we know which00:29:38
exists, that is, then we need00:29:40
ask the question whether only universes can00:29:42
emerge from nothing as they say00:29:43
skeptics, materialists, that is, it turns out00:29:46
that the materialist agrees that everything00:29:49
what is in the world in the universe is00:29:51
the reason but not from the Universe itself00:29:54
that is, Why does the Universe itself not00:29:56
there must be a reason if it is what it is00:29:59
such nothing from which it appears00:30:02
Universe what is he like?00:30:03
properties such that only universes from00:30:06
it may appear but nothing else00:30:08
this is completely arbitrary00:30:10
assert that at the beginning of the universe00:30:12
there was no reason but everything00:30:14
everything else in the universe has a reason B00:30:17
in the end if we say If you think about it00:30:20
how absurd is and and00:30:23
This statement is radical because00:30:25
if at least something could appear00:30:28
ever from nothing then we are now not00:30:31
we know what else can appear out of nothing00:30:34
that is, out of nothing it means for no reason00:30:37
that's how someone said that if it comes00:30:41
a man comes to us and says that00:30:43
some stupid things little known00:30:45
man then we laugh at him but when00:30:47
famous people say stupid things00:30:50
doctorate then we think that how00:30:52
it's that we take them for deep00:30:56
thoughts This is exactly the case Now we00:30:59
we can ask if an elephant could00:31:01
appear for no reason rhinoceros see we00:31:04
destroyed if we say that something00:31:06
appeared out of nowhere at least once in00:31:08
we destroyed stories00:31:09
cause-and-effect relationships Now we are not00:31:11
we know maybe they exist in nature00:31:13
things that happen for no reason00:31:15
maybe there are some phenomena in nature00:31:18
occur in this way then science does not00:31:21
can give an answer to them and there is nothing even00:31:23
try to explain why they happen00:31:25
they just happen for no reason, just like00:31:27
the whole universe00:31:28
therefore, it is most rational and still00:31:31
the best explanation for the origin of00:31:34
The universe will be God, that is, is it00:31:37
some reason So we talked to you00:31:39
and we talk to you about the Universe which00:31:41
there is a reason behind00:31:43
beyond the matter of time What is00:31:47
The universe in which we live will turn around and00:31:49
let's see what kind of Universe this is00:31:52
properties let's assume that you are leaving And00:31:56
want to travel somewhere you're going00:32:01
on vacation you rent a room in a hotel00:32:04
and now you come to this room00:32:06
when you open the door it looks like this00:32:08
uh at this moment when you come in you00:32:11
feel what you hear your playing00:32:13
darling00:32:14
music you sniff00:32:28
favorite flowers on the reading table00:32:32
a book by your favorite author and00:32:34
open on the page you are on00:32:37
just finished reading it yesterday00:32:40
and in the end you will come to the conclusion and you00:32:44
you see that the drinks cost some00:32:47
in the end you will come to the conclusion that it should00:32:49
have some explanation It's not easy00:32:51
coincidence most likely someone knew that00:32:53
you will come They knew enough about you00:32:56
and they built the room in this way00:33:01
furnish00:33:03
obviously this is not about you for a reason, we will start00:33:06
suspect that something is wrong here00:33:08
these things can't be simple00:33:11
it's a coincidence that the universe is like that00:33:13
It turns out she is exactly like this00:33:15
room Our universe is controlled00:33:18
laws of nature and certain00:33:20
constants and constants do not depend00:33:22
nothing and they are they describe our00:33:25
Universe We also know that everything consists00:33:28
from atoms and molecules and that the atoms themselves00:33:30
imagine it consists of a core where there is00:33:33
protons and neutrons and electrons which00:33:36
are in different orbits around00:33:39
around the core, we also know that a00:33:43
The electron is negatively charged and the proton00:33:46
positive that's why they attract00:33:47
to each other and this is what regulates00:33:51
this attraction is also called con00:33:53
constant electromagnetic00:33:55
interaction it turns out that if although00:33:58
I would like to change this constant a little00:34:00
electrons will no longer be held in00:34:01
atoms they will eventually fly apart00:34:03
atoms will lose their electrons if00:34:06
atoms will not be able to increase it00:34:09
unite with each other This is due to00:34:11
because when atoms combine with each other00:34:12
other in e in various subjects Yes we00:34:16
we know that they exchange electrons00:34:18
so this will be impossible, that is, we00:34:21
we are talking about the fact that the universe is subtle00:34:23
configured for everything to work00:34:25
worked so that chemistry worked like00:34:27
based on the Proton mass ratio00:34:30
electron too, if you change then the molecules00:34:33
gravity will not be able to form00:34:36
constant if you change it, that is, that is00:34:39
the stars will burn out too quickly00:34:41
if it is increased or And if it00:34:43
reduce then the density of stars will be00:34:46
not enough for thermonuclear fusion00:34:48
that is, and such parameters in00:34:50
There is a lot of universe, this is also called00:34:52
fine tuning of the Universe That is, if00:34:54
you will take the basic fundamentals00:34:57
constants and Change their value then00:35:00
There will be no life in the Universe at all00:35:01
it will be impossible to exist Steven00:35:04
Hawking writes the laws of science about this.00:35:06
we know them Currently contain00:35:08
many fundamental numbers such as00:35:10
the magnitude of the electric charge of an electron00:35:12
and the ratio of proton and electron masses00:35:15
a remarkable fact is that00:35:17
the values of these numbers were at a minimum00:35:19
very precisely adjusted to00:35:20
make it possible to develop life and not00:35:24
only this but our solar system it00:35:27
Same00:35:28
finely tuned for the existence of life00:35:31
on the planet, the distance from the Earth to the Sun00:35:33
if you increase it, everything will freeze if00:35:37
reduce it, everything will burn on the ground00:35:40
color of sunlight If you change the light00:35:42
sunlight then photosynthesis no longer00:35:45
will happen so effectively00:35:48
The orbital eccentricity of the earth is00:35:50
there is its remoteness at different times00:35:53
seasons and it also influences that is00:35:57
If you00:35:58
e Change it, for example, in cold weather00:36:01
everything will freeze and in the summer everything00:36:04
the Earth's orbital period will burn out00:36:06
around actually if for example it00:36:08
increase then the wind speed will be00:36:11
too big it will blur everything00:36:15
inflate and life is unlikely to00:36:18
exist and the likelihood00:36:21
some did it according to what00:36:23
the probability that the Universe is ours00:36:26
there will be names like this with exactly these00:36:28
constants with the following parameters needed00:36:30
for life and it turned out there is the number 10 in00:36:35
degree 127 That is, it is 10 e from 12700:36:40
zeros after it, that is, for comparison00:36:43
in total in our Universe 10 in eight00:36:47
degrees of atoms That is, you can imagine00:36:50
imagine what number this is00:36:52
It's absolutely incredible that something like this00:36:54
could have happened this tells us that00:36:57
that the best explanation would not be00:37:00
chance and reason is the root cause00:37:03
which is outside of time which00:37:06
is outside of matter outside of space00:37:08
she had to set up00:37:10
and the universe in such a way that in it00:37:13
there could be life skeptics00:37:16
they say Well, if only there were constants00:37:18
otherwise we wouldn't be here Well, okay00:37:20
let's think about it Imagine00:37:22
that you are living during World War II00:37:24
war and you decide to go somewhere00:37:27
rest Well, or about that time So00:37:30
you arrive by train and where are you going?00:37:34
get off the train, walk and then suddenly00:37:37
a military vehicle suddenly approaches you00:37:39
uh, enough, they put you in this car, throws you00:37:43
you go there and they take you to shoot00:37:46
So they bring you and put you up against the wall and uh00:37:50
the soldiers are ordered to shoot they are told00:37:52
aim fire they pull the trigger and00:37:55
they all misfire no one00:37:59
shot Okay they're talking again00:38:01
recharge again recharge again00:38:02
all soldiers misfire at the same time and so00:38:05
happens again and again and again and again00:38:06
and again until they no longer have you00:38:08
they let go because they can00:38:10
shoot in the end you come to your00:38:13
friends you00:38:14
survived, went through such a nightmare and you told them00:38:19
tell your friends about it00:38:21
they look at you with this face and00:38:23
they say Well, if they had fired then00:38:25
you wouldn't be here00:38:26
it was true that if they had fired00:38:28
you wouldn't be here but it's true but00:38:31
this requires an explanation of how this can happen00:38:33
be that they are all soldiers at the same time and00:38:36
they all misfired, that is00:38:39
the reality is that the fact that if00:38:42
If there were other laws of physics, then we would00:38:46
it wasn't here it's true but it's nothing00:38:48
fine tuning doesn't explain it all00:38:51
The universe requires00:38:53
explanations and statement Tom chtoli00:38:57
laws of physics and it is no way00:39:01
doesn't explain So we talked and00:39:04
we talk about what the Universe has00:39:06
certain properties of it are certain00:39:08
constants finely tuned for life00:39:11
but we also know that our Earth is in it00:39:15
a bunch of00:39:16
and it contains many different00:39:19
different kingdoms of animals are known to us00:39:22
and all these animals are made up of00:39:25
and cells and it’s remarkable that we know00:39:29
what else from the school course probably something00:39:32
there are cells inside the cell00:39:35
certain parts are defined like this00:39:38
called organelles they are called and they00:39:41
perform different functions interesting00:39:43
example is mitochondria mitochondria them00:39:46
also called energy, as it were, uh00:39:49
like they are like little power plants they are00:39:53
produce energy So it turns out00:39:57
that inside the mitochondria there are such00:39:59
small engines that due to00:40:02
movements of internal protons which00:40:05
helps them move Yes they produce00:40:07
uh ATP that's why it's called ATP00:40:11
synthase so this one is even two00:40:13
engine in one One part rotates and00:40:16
the other is at the top when torsioned it compresses00:40:19
and combines two chemical elements00:40:21
producing ATP synthesis producing ATP here00:40:24
this ATP is Energy Currency00:40:27
cells00:40:28
and it is noteworthy that A, in principle,00:40:32
its operating principle is very similar to00:40:34
water mill That is, it is driven00:40:36
due to movement A due to flow00:40:39
protons as I already mentioned and moreover00:40:42
she's so tiny she's on duty00:40:44
pins will fit 10 quintillion00:40:46
such engines are very small00:40:48
engine its efficiency is maximum permissible00:40:51
laws of physics, that is, almost 100%00:40:53
there are our engines compared to it00:40:56
well uh00:40:57
They don’t measure up yet, but here are the photos00:41:00
made using electronic00:41:02
microscope can be seen here and one00:41:05
scientist says that today biology00:41:07
hides reveals importance00:41:09
molecular machines and others00:41:11
highly organized molecular00:41:12
structures that implement complex00:41:15
physical and chemical processes in which00:41:17
life is founded and what kind of things are these?00:41:20
molecular machines other than ATP synthase00:41:23
an interesting example is kinesin00:41:25
transport protein is actually what it is00:41:28
does he walk through these micro tubes00:41:30
which are like roads inside00:41:32
cells and these uh and it carries various00:41:37
loads And for one For one step he00:41:40
uses one ATP molecule, that is, yes00:41:42
AT synthase occurs produces00:41:45
e ATP molecules energy currency00:41:48
cells and he uses them to00:41:50
carry various loads inside the cage00:41:55
scientists write that our results show00:41:57
beyond simple molecular transport00:41:59
the engine must do a lot00:42:01
number of functions to00:42:03
to work successfully in a cage must be00:42:04
possibility of switching on and off00:42:06
engine and it must be able00:42:09
accept the cargo required in a certain00:42:10
place and move it to point00:42:13
destination it is noteworthy that this lowland00:42:16
The motor can take 100 steps per00:42:17
second this if we compare this then this00:42:21
comparable if it00:42:23
size to compare you can compare it with00:42:28
super sound car passion that00:42:30
yes, he rushes at great speed Yes00:42:33
we saw those examples where he seemed to00:42:34
the action is actually slow00:42:36
they rush there at great speed00:42:38
inside the cell and transmit various00:42:41
molecules are transported back and forth00:42:44
there is substantial evidence that00:42:46
that loads in natural conditions00:42:48
transported using several00:42:49
engines That is, if the load is too00:42:51
large several engines not engines to00:42:54
it is connected and these00:42:57
they can also bypass engines00:43:01
obstacles that is what we have here00:43:03
with biological machines00:43:06
who work inside our00:43:09
body and one of the authors of the magazine se this00:43:13
a very high quality magazine writes00:43:14
the following cell can be compared with00:43:16
factory containing a complex network00:43:18
interconnected assembly lines each00:43:21
of which consists of many large00:43:23
protein machines Why do we call00:43:25
large underlying protein gates00:43:28
functioning of the cell by proteins00:43:29
cars precisely because it’s similar00:43:32
cars00:43:34
designed to work effectively with00:43:36
macroscopic world these protein00:43:38
aggregates contain exactly00:43:39
coordinated moving parts00:43:41
there is our cell, it looks like a factory in00:43:44
which has many different cars and00:43:46
Naturally we cannot mention them all00:43:49
but some sources provide00:43:51
near00:43:52
203 different types of protein machines00:43:56
interesting examples e Here it is00:43:58
bacterium Hey or E. coli like us00:44:02
we call it this bacterium How00:44:06
apparently she has such a mustache00:44:09
which go in different directions00:44:10
are called bacterial flagella and they00:44:13
attach to bacteria00:44:15
due to such a small motor which00:44:19
spins and produces the movement of this00:44:22
Antennae and Bacteria can move beyond00:44:24
this00:44:26
this one looks something like this00:44:28
flagellum that is, there is a hook and this hook00:44:31
moves bacteria also even eat00:44:34
photograph So we can this flagellum00:44:37
can make 100,000 revolutions per00:44:39
a minute And why is he so small?00:44:42
what if you place 35,000 of these motors00:44:45
next to each other then they will take only 100:44:47
mm So this is00:44:50
micromotor as one molecular wrote00:44:52
biologist more than others00:44:54
motors flagellum is similar to a machine with00:44:57
human design is here00:44:59
photographs taken electronically00:45:01
microscope of this this little one00:45:03
the engine is easy00:45:05
Amazingly, in one of the Trend articles00:45:08
in microbiology, the flagellum is exquisitely named00:45:11
Chemist engineered osmotic00:45:13
nanomachines with the most powerful in nature00:45:15
rotary engine using00:45:17
transmembrane ion propulsion force00:45:20
to bring the movement of the thread and visible00:45:22
this propeller and the propeller for00:45:25
whose count is spinning and and and happening00:45:27
then the movement of the flagellum So how do we00:45:31
find out the reason for the appearance of this gu00:45:34
flagellum and all these machines we are talking about00:45:36
said What are we first of all00:45:40
when we discuss with you we need to know00:45:41
What are the reasons for something like this in00:45:44
present when we talk about motors00:45:47
some complex systems00:45:49
interacting with each other then we00:45:52
we know that if we observe the engine then00:45:55
he must have any engineer00:45:57
engine requires an engineer00:46:00
We never see the engine00:46:02
appeared00:46:04
without an engineer as a result of some00:46:06
random processes So we can do this00:46:10
say it if the observation is in the present00:46:12
confirms that some phenomenon00:46:15
always caused by a specific reason00:46:17
a similar phenomenon in the past must have00:46:19
a similar reason that is what we say00:46:21
what if in the present engines are always00:46:24
is the result of Reasonable00:46:26
activity00:46:27
then we must postulate in the past00:46:30
the same similar reason That is, if00:46:33
we want to explain the appearance of some00:46:34
engine then we should use it already00:46:37
reasons known to us are also called00:46:40
the principle of uniformity that is, we are in00:46:43
basically we use it every day and00:46:46
so we can think rationally and then00:46:50
there are some who say that only00:46:52
there must be natural causes, that is00:46:54
you can't talk about what you have00:46:55
there must be something Supernatural00:46:57
reason but it's not true or what they say00:47:00
that this is not scientific for example00:47:01
criminology is just that00:47:04
uh she has to find a reason she has to00:47:07
determine whether it was accident or intent00:47:08
that was the reason something had something intelligent00:47:12
Yes some kind of consequence or this00:47:14
there was a natural law of nature that is00:47:17
we are dealing with science that is trying00:47:19
determine e and determine the cause and it00:47:23
Quite calmly dealing with00:47:26
mental activity in humans00:47:29
For example00:47:30
if we find the police come Yes00:47:34
a house burned down somewhere, he's an investigator00:47:37
should investigate what's going on Yes he does00:47:40
must investigate the facts and see00:47:43
If he finds matches there, for example on00:47:46
that place if he finds a canister of00:47:48
finds, for example, some gasoline00:47:50
some traces then it’s all together00:47:54
their some other possible things they00:47:56
they talk about what it should have00:47:59
just a reasonable reason would be00:48:01
It's not healthy to tell people like that00:48:04
actually their that their answer is not scientific00:48:06
simply because they postulate00:48:07
reasonable00:48:08
reason It’s exactly the same here when we00:48:11
we know that engines are the result00:48:13
actions of reasonable action then when we00:48:16
we meet these engines in our cells00:48:19
Yes in our systems alive and alive00:48:21
organisms, then this is absolutely scientific more00:48:25
this is probably the best explanation00:48:28
the appearance of these engines is natural00:48:31
processes do not produce engines If you00:48:35
want to postulate this is your right00:48:37
but we know that such reasons We never00:48:40
not observed so as not to be reasonable00:48:43
reasons why engines were created so that the wind00:48:45
any weathering00:48:47
also thermal expansion and what00:48:50
anything else produced machines So00:48:54
we are talking to you about what is00:48:55
many different ones but then it arises00:48:58
what is the question? Here are the components00:49:00
cars where did they come from? Yes who00:49:03
is responsible for the fact that these machines will be00:49:06
built exactly this way and is responsible for that00:49:09
so that this is exactly the construction00:49:11
proteins in this machine and in order to00:49:14
for her work Where does all this come from?00:49:16
cells up to a certain point in00:49:18
no one knew about Darwin's time00:49:20
for example, many thought that the Cell -00:49:23
it's just a small pad of jelly00:49:26
filled with some kind of liquid00:49:28
Today we know that this is far from true and00:49:30
a cell is a whole city, so here we are00:49:33
Everyone knows what's inside the cell nucleus00:49:36
Francis Crick and James DNA exists00:49:39
Uson received the Nobel Prize for00:49:41
discovery of the properties of this DNA and we know00:49:44
that this DNA is packaged in the cell nucleus00:49:47
and it is packaged in chromosomes and consists00:49:52
from how different it is encoded in it00:49:54
Some genes also say that this is a language00:49:58
life length of DNA in one human00:50:00
the cell is about 2 MT that is huge00:50:03
quantity00:50:04
the sequence is remarkable that here00:50:07
this language of life00:50:08
it's very similar to our languages, it's exactly00:50:12
exactly For example, if we take the alphabet00:50:14
Morse then a certain sequence00:50:18
dots and dashes convey information to us00:50:21
there is information depends on the mind then00:50:24
do we know the sequence?00:50:27
someone wants to give us some code00:50:29
then this code and we say what it is00:50:32
sequence of characters producing00:50:34
specific effect yes that is if we00:50:36
we want to convey information e sos Yes00:50:38
some kind of message from here00:50:40
specific effect will be this00:50:42
the message we want to convey is this00:50:44
our DNA works exactly the same way and it00:50:48
only it doesn’t consist of dots and dashes, but it00:50:51
basic units are not dots and dashes but00:50:54
four guanine nitrogen bases00:50:57
cytosine thymine adenine they are paired00:50:59
the bases are connected to each other and00:51:01
form a certain00:51:04
sequence and this00:51:05
sequence of characters produces00:51:07
specific effect That is00:51:10
construction of proteins, that is, we are dealing00:51:12
as Hubert Joki says, physicist and expert00:51:15
in the field of information theory is very important00:51:17
understand that there is no reasoning here00:51:19
analogies as he writes a hypothesis00:51:21
sequences That is, this is this00:51:24
The DNA we were talking about00:51:27
applied directly to proteins and00:51:29
genetic text as well as to00:51:31
written language That is, he tells us00:51:34
that DNA is a language, if it is a language then there00:51:38
there is a certain message that he00:51:40
carries the human genome includes 300:51:42
billion nucleotides This is huge00:51:45
message and Here for example00:51:47
presented presented00:51:49
subsequence00:51:51
DNA of one of the genes gene00:51:55
Belona and ours This information00:51:59
the capacity of DNA itself is so dense that00:52:02
if we rewrote all the books00:52:03
libraries of the world into the DNA language then their00:52:05
the content would fit in a volume equal to00:52:08
1% of the head of a pin that is ours00:52:12
information media compared to00:52:14
this is just rubbish And Richard is already with00:52:18
whom we met and we go back to him00:52:20
we'll be back today he's a guest on the program00:52:22
we will be the nucleus of every cell contains00:52:24
digital coding database more than00:52:26
all 30 British00:52:29
encyclopedia So what is this00:52:32
information sometimes the question arises how00:52:35
we need to correctly determine the information00:52:36
We probably use everything when we use it00:52:39
word information we know what we have in00:52:41
I mean, but the thing is that it’s not like that00:52:44
sometimes it's easy to determine because00:52:47
some in some areas of science00:52:50
when they talk about information they mean00:52:52
a little different from what we are in00:52:54
everyday life information theory00:52:57
For example, if I take printed on00:52:59
keyboard Well, here's something00:53:01
there will be something similar like here00:53:03
the reality is that from the point of view00:53:05
information theory is what we have00:53:07
is it difficult or unlikely00:53:08
sequence is that it is complex00:53:10
unlikely in other words what if I00:53:12
I'll type something again, exactly like that00:53:14
anyhow it will be different00:53:17
sequence that is unlikely00:53:19
what exactly is this sequence00:53:20
would appear, that is, we are dealing with00:53:23
something that is from a mathematical point of view00:53:26
a Or those who are interested in theory00:53:28
information or this question in general00:53:30
it's called Chinon information Yes it is00:53:34
Only people in the area know about this00:53:35
computer science is not for ordinary people at all00:53:38
interesting, but you need to understand this00:53:41
we know this information does not convey00:53:44
contains functional information00:53:46
there is this this sequence00:53:48
characters and now Imagine Compare this with00:53:51
phrase I love you, can you see she too00:53:54
difficult or unlikely00:53:55
sequence like like and that which00:53:57
above That is, if we just look at00:53:58
she's like a set of letters she too00:54:00
it's unlikely that you00:54:03
anything will print this will be it00:54:05
yes if we are talking about what we print00:54:07
just arbitrary but it's different from00:54:11
previous And what is it? What00:54:13
distinguishes her distinguishes this this Arrangement00:54:17
signs that her arrangement of signs00:54:19
specific for obtaining specific00:54:21
effect, that is, a special specific00:54:24
effect she has a goal goal00:54:26
information convey thought So you need00:54:30
understand that complexity in itself is not00:54:32
proves that something has been created00:54:34
for example, we see Mount Goverla00:54:37
high mountain in Ukraine00:54:39
and Mount Goverla is very complex, its terrain00:54:43
very difficult therefore the terrain is also difficult00:54:46
does not prove that something is created by the mind00:54:49
Yes we know that this is the result00:54:50
weathering is the result of various00:54:52
geological processes like this00:54:54
way it can be compared with this00:54:56
here is a set of characters and it is complex but not00:54:59
carries no00:55:01
uh specific information is the same00:55:04
time crystals and snowflakes including00:55:07
they are ordered this is orderliness00:55:10
orderliness is when something00:55:11
a pattern repeats itself over and over again00:55:14
and this can be compared in language since00:55:17
if we said aw aw aw and repeated00:55:20
would again and again That is, it is ordered00:55:23
but not complicated however Mount Rushmore00:55:26
in the United States of America she00:55:29
differs from these two examples in00:55:32
the same00:55:33
time carries certain messages00:55:36
she has a certain message00:55:38
there is a goal00:55:40
some kind of idea, some kind of thought00:55:43
something that is transmitted through it like this00:55:45
We00:55:48
different or00:55:50
from some kind of orderliness like us00:55:54
they talked about this, for example, Leslie Ogel00:55:58
this is a famous researcher00:56:01
origin of life he writes living00:56:02
organisms are distinguished by specific00:56:04
difficulty crystals cannot be counted00:56:06
alive because they have no complexity00:56:08
random combination of polymers too00:56:10
cannot be considered alive because they are not00:56:12
has specificity, that is, it00:56:14
specific difficulty It's not easy00:56:17
the theory I came up with is specifically00:56:19
used by people in everyday life00:56:22
terminology researchers for00:56:24
defining specific information00:56:27
The cry we already mentioned is00:56:30
formulated what we call00:56:31
Central Dogma00:56:33
cells The central dogma of the cell we know00:56:36
that cells have DNA, so it turns out00:56:38
What00:56:41
DNA is transformed, that is, it is to DNA00:56:45
special proteins are added00:56:47
machines they read it and translate it into00:56:49
language RNA then here's the sequence00:56:54
RNA ends up in certain special00:56:57
protein machines that produce protein00:57:01
it's called the Central Dogma of the Cell00:57:04
and he said that here is Francis Crick00:57:08
also says what we have here00:57:10
deal with by information I mean00:57:12
specific amino acid00:57:14
protein sequence that is exact00:57:16
sequencing is not easy00:57:18
some kind00:57:19
and some kind of Abracadabra this is00:57:22
specific information for a specific00:57:25
goals and that's what I said now ah we00:57:28
uh can be seen in the next short one00:57:32
video a-a00:57:33
illustrating this00:57:38
[music]00:57:55
moment00:57:57
in 1957 Francis Rieck for the first time00:58:00
suggested that chemical compounds00:58:02
called bases and located00:58:05
DNA molecules function along the chain00:58:07
like letters of the language alphabet or00:58:09
digital machine code units00:58:11
animation shows how digital00:58:13
information controls protein synthesis00:58:15
first a large protein complex00:58:17
separates the DNA helix preparing it for00:58:19
copying during the process00:58:21
transcription protein complex under00:58:23
polymerase name will create a copy00:58:26
primary00:58:27
instructions here we see how in the process00:58:30
copying messenger RNA molecule00:58:32
created inside the polymerase At that time00:58:34
how individual bases are added to00:58:36
growing00:58:38
threads Now we are watching from the side00:58:41
by the action of polymerase While it00:58:43
pushes out the matrix thread00:58:45
RNA is then a product of transcription00:58:48
approaches and passes through00:58:50
molecular machine called00:58:52
nuclear pore recognition device00:58:54
I control by00:58:57
and inside the core00:59:04
we now see cells as instructions00:59:06
for genetic assembly line00:59:09
approaching a chemical factory under00:59:11
name00:59:12
ribosome is the site of protein00:59:15
[music]00:59:17
synthesis when messenger RNA passes00:59:20
the process begins through the ribosome00:59:22
broadcast during broadcast00:59:24
a mechanical line connects a special circuit00:59:27
amino acids according to00:59:29
instructions from00:59:31
RNA transports these amino acids from00:59:35
other parts of the cell molecules under00:59:37
name of transfer RNA connecting00:59:40
specific base sequence00:59:42
with relevant00:59:43
amino acids sequential00:59:45
the placement of amino acids determines the type00:59:47
produced00:59:48
squirrel when the chain is completed00:59:51
she moves into a Bochko-like machine00:59:53
form the purpose of which I will minimize the exact00:59:56
form to complete your01:00:14
functions after the chain has coiled into01:00:17
protein it is released into the cytoplasm for01:00:19
performing its function in01:00:24
cage01:00:30
[music]01:00:40
[music]01:00:54
Di01:00:57
[music]01:01:03
the result of random processes as01:01:05
skeptics tell us and So how to find out01:01:08
why ask this question again01:01:11
so that we understand how to think correctly A01:01:13
we know that information is never01:01:14
is the result of natural01:01:16
processes this is the information that01:01:18
says specific information that01:01:20
conveys specific information01:01:22
specific message So if we know01:01:25
that there is information, we know what it is01:01:28
the result must be the result01:01:30
intelligent activity as Henry said01:01:33
Valer pioneer pioneer in the field of theory01:01:36
information creation of information is habitual01:01:38
associated with conscious01:01:40
activity So therefore it is reasonable01:01:42
talk about what01:01:44
as far as we know what is in the present01:01:46
information is always the result01:01:48
activities should be so in the past01:01:50
be that is, the DNA must have a reasonable01:01:54
the reason someone has to create it is not01:01:58
may be the result of accidental01:02:01
processes Richard Ons said that in DNA01:02:05
one Lily's seed or sperm01:02:07
one salamander has enough space to01:02:10
save 60 british clawdie and him01:02:12
believes that this is the result of chance01:02:15
there are so many processes01:02:17
the amount of information is01:02:19
the result of simply random mutations in01:02:23
DNA Is this really something to talk about?01:02:27
in general, in the end it turns out that atheists01:02:29
write books filled with information01:02:31
claiming that the information is not required01:02:32
reasonable source and honestly01:02:34
reading some of their books really01:02:37
you might think01:02:39
What01:02:41
obviously the source of these books was not01:02:44
there was another reasonable interesting example with01:02:48
such a project01:02:53
as we are This project whose goal is01:02:56
was to discover alien life and01:03:00
This was done by means of01:03:02
space were constantly directed01:03:06
huge telescopes that scanned01:03:08
him constantly in search of a message that is01:03:12
They understood that if there was a message then01:03:15
this will indicate that01:03:17
there is Intelligent Life somewhere else01:03:21
this message should have01:03:23
Reasonable reason is only reason01:03:26
information otherwise the search for this would be01:03:29
Senseless Kagan is a famous atheist01:03:32
says that even one received from01:03:35
space message would prove that it is possible01:03:37
overcome the current teenage period01:03:39
technology what what civilization after all01:03:42
survived and moved forward, that is, car01:03:44
Sagan, being an atheist, says what if01:03:47
we will find information in space message01:03:50
Kato this will prove that there is01:03:54
the intelligence inside our DNA does not prove01:03:58
what is the creator that is This is excellent01:04:01
an example of hypocrisy is simple How01:04:04
Americans01:04:06
they say, that is, this is the most Well, not on01:04:10
there is such an example. By the way, nothing01:04:14
found no vital signs and01:04:17
nothing is01:04:18
will find So from the point of view of materialism01:04:22
The sun that exists is matter and01:04:24
the energy of nature that controls this01:04:26
matter is the same car Sagan whom we01:04:29
we already know he said that Space is everything01:04:31
what once was and what will once be01:04:34
So everything that exists is matter and01:04:36
energy Well if that's the case give it to yourself01:04:39
Let's imagine the following: we all know each other01:04:42
Everyone bought Coca-Cola and everyone drank it01:04:47
if you open a can of Coca-Cola01:04:49
what is happening that is everything is happening in01:04:52
as a result of natural01:04:54
processes means gases begin to escape01:04:56
from it and this bank there is no way01:04:58
act differently that is everything01:05:01
conditioned and also determined01:05:04
as they say based on the laws of nature01:05:07
the engine that runs in your01:05:09
car you turn the ignition key and01:05:13
a number of processes occur here cause01:05:16
investigative connections01:05:18
and starts with the engine01:05:21
supply fuel internal combustion01:05:25
there is an explosion there and so on01:05:27
the engine starts its work01:05:31
that is01:05:32
everything is in01:05:34
borders of physics and chemistry All in full01:05:38
predetermined engine cannot01:05:40
react differently he reacts this way01:05:43
he is equipped and like the laws of nature he01:05:45
it is dictated But if materialism is01:05:48
It’s true that you and I are also biological01:05:50
robots We are no different from01:05:52
engine or that can of Coca-Cola01:05:54
only we are much more complicated That's all01:05:57
the difference is more complicated. So if this is the case, we01:06:01
you are biological robots then this says01:06:04
that all your views are01:06:06
the result of the interaction of molecules in01:06:08
in your brain think of it as01:06:10
should If this is so then everything that is about01:06:13
you think this is the result only01:06:16
interactions between molecules, that is, it arises01:06:18
question: How can you trust your01:06:20
conclusions Why do you think that your01:06:22
the molecules in your brain work better01:06:24
than the molecules in your neighbor's brain01:06:28
Moreover, in the end this means that everything01:06:31
your thoughts are conclusions and materialistic01:06:33
views including this is the result01:06:35
interactions of molecules as their own01:06:39
Imagine No religion conferences ri Coin01:06:42
says the following many of you do not01:06:44
accept this you don't believe that you01:06:46
robots made of meat but I'll try to convince01:06:48
you in this is what he said at his lecture01:06:53
I wonder how he will try to convince01:06:57
someone The point is that belief01:06:59
assumes the existence of free will but01:07:02
Jerry Coy doesn't believe he exists01:07:04
free will like who it will be01:07:06
convince the pieces with meat, well, try it01:07:09
convince the engine convince the engine01:07:11
to make it work differently but you can't01:07:13
the engine will do this01:07:16
act in accordance with the laws01:07:17
nature of chemistry and physics but its01:07:21
the audience can only react01:07:22
therefore the audience has no conviction01:07:24
no point01:07:26
the same Jerry Cohn says in the same lecture01:07:28
that our behavior is determined01:07:30
completely behavior absolutely completely01:07:33
determined by the laws of nature, then the same01:07:36
also says that we are bowls and sugar but01:07:38
very difficult this is materialism So from01:07:41
it follows that a worldview is01:07:43
purely the result of his interaction01:07:44
molecules in the head exactly the same as01:07:46
Christian, that is, our worldview01:07:50
just a reaction and not a result01:07:52
thoughts If you think about it01:07:54
as it should be, that's what you're thinking about01:07:57
point of view of materialism Your thoughts and01:08:00
those thoughts inclusive that you think01:08:01
Now the result is exclusively01:08:04
natural chemistry processes in your01:08:06
brain e and what about When you think about01:08:10
somehow this is also a result uh01:08:12
physical processes, that is, everything01:08:14
entirely the result of physical processes01:08:16
that is, your idea of yourself as01:08:19
about personality and when you think that you01:08:21
something you think is actually an illusion01:08:24
all you have are molecules and laws01:08:28
nature Haldane wrote about this he said01:08:32
if my mental processes are entirely01:08:34
caused by the movement of atoms in my01:08:36
brain then I have no reason to believe that01:08:38
my conclusions are correct and therefore I have no01:08:40
reasons to believe that the brain my brain consists01:08:43
of atoms, materialism itself refutes01:08:46
myself and Francis Crick01:08:49
who discovered DNA sequences01:08:53
he wrote something like this he was a materialist he01:08:55
said a striking hypothesis is01:08:58
that you are your joys and your sorrows01:09:00
Memories and aspirations are your feeling01:09:02
personal identity and free will01:09:05
in fact no more than certain01:09:07
behavior of a huge cluster of nervous01:09:09
cells and uh molecules associated with it you01:09:12
nothing more than a set of neurons, although01:09:14
it seems that we have free will01:09:16
our decisions are already predetermined for us01:09:19
and we can't change that So we01:09:21
we just don’t have free biorobots01:09:23
will and this means that we have no soul01:09:26
naturally we have no reason and no01:09:28
personality mind is something something that01:09:30
must be outside our01:09:33
brain, but all we have is the brain01:09:36
Mind - It's just an illusion Personality01:09:38
- it is also an illusion that you exist01:09:41
- this is an illusion, you are an illusion in the world of molecules01:09:44
and Sam Haris writes about this free will01:09:47
- this is an illusion, our will does not belong01:09:48
us I can't determine my desires01:09:51
my mental mood given by space01:09:53
the question arises: how can we then01:09:54
at all01:09:55
lock someone up in prison and think that01:09:57
he will change his mind because change01:09:59
his opinion presupposes the presence01:10:01
free will is a serious issue with01:10:05
point of view of atheism It’s interesting that01:10:07
ratio wiki gives this, ratio wiki -01:10:10
this is an atheist website and they they give01:10:13
definition of rationality what is it01:10:15
rationality Let's ask them this01:10:17
property of human thinking that allows01:10:19
him consciously systematically and01:10:22
consistently choose the most01:10:24
goals that are beneficial to oneself and not contradictory01:10:26
that is, rationality is an ability01:10:28
choice between rational and01:10:31
irrational But choice presupposes01:10:34
the presence of Free will However, from the point of view01:10:37
from the point of view of materialism, Free will is not01:10:38
there is something and there is no choice A01:10:41
that means there is no rationality01:10:43
so somehow materialists or01:10:46
atheists can tell us that their01:10:48
religion their beliefs rational ours01:10:50
irrational if they don't do anything01:10:51
choose them all everything completely with their01:10:54
thinking is driven by interaction01:10:57
molecules01:10:59
molecule way we're talking about01:11:00
rationality from their point of view01:11:02
does not exist at all because every01:11:05
thought each worldview is determined01:11:07
just the structure of the brain if you have01:11:09
the other person's brain switches off a little01:11:11
you will have other conclusions then you will come to01:11:13
to a different worldview This is it01:11:15
consistent materialism However, if01:11:18
you chose to listen to me now then atheism01:11:21
cannot be true Think check01:11:23
yourself now and think about the choice01:11:26
watch this lecture or not If01:11:30
do you think are you sure that you chose what01:11:32
you have Free will after all01:11:35
means that materialism is not true and is01:11:37
something that is beyond yours01:11:39
brain and your molecules this is you and01:11:42
The Bible says that this is ours01:11:44
spirit As they say in this car there is01:11:48
this ghost has freedom in01:11:54
has01:11:56
naturally using our machine01:11:58
our body then this sun makes sense01:12:02
then we have free will then we01:12:04
we think otherwise everything is predetermined01:12:07
think about it If you come to01:12:10
your friend and you try him in something01:12:13
convince The point is that you think that you01:12:16
chose to do something but in reality01:12:18
you had all the actions fully determined01:12:22
just chemical reactions in the brain01:12:25
Moreover, His reaction is already predetermined01:12:28
he also has no freedom of choice, so you01:12:30
don't really convince him, he just01:12:32
reacts to01:12:33
yours to yours to your words That's all we are01:12:38
everyone knows a man like Karl01:12:40
Marx he wrote a book Yes he is capital01:12:43
he spoke about the bourgeoisie of various classes01:12:46
said that some classes oppress others01:12:48
so he was he was absolute01:12:51
a materialist, he believed that there is no God01:12:55
So Karbas believed that different classes01:12:59
different structure of the mind, that is, in principle01:13:01
quite reasonable from a point of view01:13:03
materialism if you think01:13:06
in a certain way it means that01:13:09
inside your brain your brain He01:13:12
furnished with a certain certain01:13:14
structure is responsible for your thinking Everything01:13:16
fully01:13:19
the determinism of the bourgeoisie is defective, that is,01:13:23
from your point of view from your point of view01:13:25
no one needs to be convinced of materialism01:13:27
because it's pointless because01:13:30
everything is already predetermined if a person does not01:13:32
wants to agree with you This means01:13:35
that he has a defect in his mind or yours Well here01:13:38
Already who will have more of which group?01:13:41
more than that they define it A and Nikita01:13:46
Khrushchev thought Thus he spoke01:13:48
Crime is a deviation from01:13:50
generally accepted norms of behavior01:13:52
caused by mental disorder01:13:54
who on this basis can call for01:13:56
we can resist communism01:13:58
say it's obviously mental01:14:00
the condition of such people is not01:14:01
normal That is, he says that01:14:05
if you don't agree with us then you01:14:07
think wrong, your brain doesn't work01:14:09
so why not destroy01:14:12
such people and today similar things too01:14:15
unfortunately there are here for example01:14:17
al-jazeera writes that the Soviet01:14:19
psychiatry returns and asks a question01:14:21
they talk about what01:14:23
some people politic their opponents01:14:26
sent to a psychiatrist and thus01:14:29
they persecute these opponents claiming01:14:33
that they have something mentally abnormal01:14:35
influencing them in this way01:14:38
pressure that is01:14:40
materialism has its own01:14:43
consequences Okay now from the point of view01:14:45
science Let's describe what we observe01:14:47
now let's imagine that01:14:49
someone is shooting with this VKA01:14:53
someone it's just with sugar it's complicated01:14:56
A01:14:57
and as Jerry Coin said, this is a bowl of01:15:01
sugar is a complex combination01:15:03
biochemical processes of biomolecules01:15:06
which gives energy to others01:15:10
collection of molecules we call01:15:12
Arrow Yes, and launches it at a target that01:15:16
is also a collection of molecules where01:15:19
she wouldn't shoot no matter what01:15:20
happened everything happens as a result01:15:22
Natural Processes Yes Science Can01:15:24
this is to write from the point of view of materialism01:15:27
there is nothing else so you move01:15:29
molecules in space shooting with a bow01:15:32
ok where are you moving them essentially?01:15:35
meanings because if you01:15:37
moves them or you01:15:40
conveys what is happening in01:15:42
the result of natural processes then01:15:45
the question arises: Does What Exist?01:15:47
such as bad good or bad from a point01:15:49
from the point of view of materialism, if all that is01:15:51
These are molecules. Atoms and molecules are chemical.01:15:54
processes01:15:55
then what difference does it make if they shoot alone?01:15:58
biochemical complex bag of molecules01:16:01
target in the cabin or he shoots at another01:16:04
complex biome with molecules, what difference does it make?01:16:08
in other words, who determines what?01:16:09
right that01:16:11
wrong if there is no God then we need01:16:14
ask this question this question01:16:17
or the state will determine for us01:16:19
what's right what's wrong01:16:20
majority opinion will be01:16:22
determine what is right and wrong01:16:24
or maybe it's a corporation I think01:16:26
that Google won't mind defining01:16:28
for us what is right and what is wrong01:16:29
they will tell us what01:16:32
need to be accepted and who may not be01:16:34
Mark Zuckerberg will tell us that01:16:38
good thing bad he seems to be on Facebook01:16:40
I'm not against doing this, that determines01:16:43
what's right what01:16:45
wrong from the point of view of atheism we01:16:47
a product of evolution that's why we are animals01:16:50
As a result, we know that natural selection01:16:52
gave monkeys a tendency to cooperate01:16:55
and a certain self-sacrifice yes We01:16:57
We know this. As a result, we evolved from01:17:00
common ancestor as evolutionists say01:17:03
so we also have some kind of stud01:17:05
morality but that doesn't mean it's01:17:07
morality is absolutely just some01:17:11
taboo some kind of general agreement01:17:14
who appeared and who helped us01:17:16
survive but that doesn't mean I am today01:17:18
must be obedient to her, this does not mean01:17:21
that everyone must be obedient01:17:23
this certain uh morality01:17:26
what kind of agreement is there from the point01:17:28
from the point of view of materialism, morality is like this01:17:31
social conditioning is like01:17:33
question right-hand drive or01:17:35
left-handed in some countries so in01:17:36
in other countries, so from the point of view01:17:39
from the point of view of materialism, you are shooting at the target01:17:41
or you shoot a person basically01:17:43
it's just a matter of choice but nothing more01:17:46
this is a matter of agreement, for example ours01:17:49
morality could be completely different01:17:50
like now, for example, queen bees01:17:52
they kill rutv we know in the end ours01:17:55
morality could definitely be exactly like this01:17:57
Charles Darwin wrote about this Darwin01:17:59
said if for example we would be01:18:02
brought up in exactly the same conditions01:18:03
as for domestic bees, there is not the slightest01:18:06
doubts that our unmarried women01:18:08
like bees the workers would combine01:18:11
sacred duty to kill your brothers01:18:14
mothers would strive to kill their own01:18:15
prolific daughters and no one would have thought01:18:17
I didn’t think of protesting against this01:18:21
I would not protest against this01:18:23
less the bee would have in the above case01:18:25
it seems to me some kind of feeling of goodness and01:18:27
evil or conscience think about what he01:18:29
now he says that is, he says that he doesn’t01:18:31
exists Actually objective01:18:33
morality And all this is the result of natural01:18:36
processes and evolution and ultimately our01:18:39
morality could perhaps evolve01:18:41
it has consequences for us in different ways01:18:43
this means that if morality is everything01:18:45
just some result of evolution01:18:48
morality can also evolve if01:18:50
everything changes in the world and so does morality01:18:53
it also tells us that about not01:18:56
exists because morality01:18:58
relative moral progress01:19:00
assumes that there is a certain Standard01:19:03
outside of society01:19:05
to which Everything moves but does not exist01:19:08
such a standard if we are animals then in01:19:11
in principle, this is how we know that if a male01:19:15
the shark mates strongly with the female then01:19:17
he doesn't do anything immoral man01:19:19
who actually rapes from the point01:19:21
point of view if we are animals nothing01:19:23
does not do immoral things or is a lion attacker01:19:26
there's nothing immoral about a zebra either01:19:28
the person who kills does the same01:19:30
point of view of materialism also in01:19:32
basically does nothing moral01:19:34
one atheist invites us to reason01:19:37
this is how he says Imagine01:19:40
imagine that you live in an uninhabited01:19:41
island with someone else he ends up talking01:19:44
that someone has things that you want01:19:46
are needed and at a certain moment you decide01:19:48
kill this man that's how he01:19:51
comments on this01:19:53
the situation dest even though it harms them01:19:56
victims no more unfair or01:19:58
immoral than if they were01:20:01
committed by one animal in relation to01:20:03
to another a hawk that snatches a fish01:20:06
from the water kills it but don’t kill it01:20:08
there is no moral component other01:20:10
And another hawk that snatches fish01:20:13
takes her from the claws of the first but does not01:20:15
steals because none of this is prohibited01:20:18
and exactly the same considerations apply to01:20:21
people whom we imagine, that is, he01:20:23
says that we are part of the kingdom01:20:26
animals and that's why we don't have01:20:28
objective morality is just some01:20:30
Taboo And some say Good - This is it01:20:34
what helps a person survive is why they01:20:36
they say you see we have the Absolute01:20:38
moral Absolute but arises Then01:20:41
question You need to ask them But why01:20:43
specifically for humans, why not for plants?01:20:46
birds or reptiles who said that01:20:49
human survival is absolute01:20:52
good we are part of evolution from the point of view01:20:55
materialism And therefore we are just here01:20:58
we are here and we are part of one01:21:00
big tree means from the point of view01:21:02
materialism you and a banana are01:21:05
relatives and the banana you eat01:21:07
You eat01:21:09
relative In the end this means What01:21:13
we are no better than others, we are far from here01:21:15
first That's what if we don't exist01:21:19
Nothing will change more than today01:21:21
many come and say it’s good01:21:22
so that we don't exist01:21:30
polluting01:21:32
that seems to be Good This is what helps01:21:35
for a person to survive is simply arbitrary01:21:37
something arbitrary has no01:21:40
grounds and cannot be explained with01:21:43
point of view of atheism as or01:21:44
presented as objective morality01:21:47
and Richard Ryder said something like that01:21:51
he calls it see or see01:21:54
discrimination, that is, to consider oneself01:21:56
privileged in the animal world with01:21:58
point of view of materialism That is, this01:22:00
like racism only vedism that is racism01:22:02
- this is when someone or a group of people01:22:06
considers himself better than another group of people A01:22:09
Vedism is when one species considers itself01:22:10
better than others, that is, the idea that01:22:13
human survival is absolute01:22:14
Good cannot be justified from the point of view01:22:18
from the point of view of materialism, Richard Dons said01:22:21
he talked about this, the universe that we are01:22:23
we observe has no intention01:22:24
there is no purpose in it, neither evil nor good01:22:27
nothing but blind merciless01:22:28
indifference DNA knows nothing about01:22:31
don't care DNA just exists and we01:22:33
Let's dance to his tune Well, Richard If it's01:22:36
so there are consequences to this and01:22:38
the consequences of which, uh, I’m already a little bit01:22:41
said now they are perfectly reflected in01:22:44
please listen to the next video and01:22:47
you will see the whole essence and the whole meaning that01:22:51
offers us01:22:53
materialism01:22:55
Wake up and01:23:04
sing hello doctor01:23:11
Palmon tonight at college I01:23:13
listened to your lecture on crime01:23:15
biology DNA instinct and01:23:20
aggression not bad presentation everything is fine01:23:23
thoughtful and yet a little abstract01:23:26
too academic for me01:23:45
look I want01:23:49
to know if you have ever lived01:23:52
my01:23:53
theory or do you prefer to scribble01:23:56
your papers Sitting in the tower and Elephant01:23:59
bones to torture students later01:24:01
the fruits of their intellectual01:24:05
exercises what do you want from me01:24:08
want me here to check yours01:24:11
hypothesis You are not a social biologist01:24:14
So01:24:16
whether01:24:18
Yes, so in your lecture you stated that01:24:21
root01:24:23
crimes01:24:25
biology determines01:24:29
behavior well I would like01:24:31
discuss this with you01:24:34
topic These are just the stakes in our debates01:24:38
will be quite real If you take01:24:40
I'll let you go if I take you up01:24:44
this is part01:24:46
what proposals01:24:49
proposal problem01:24:51
solved n/a01:24:55
so that I don't let you down01:24:58
killed for you Arguments01:25:01
denier and affirmer01:25:06
Professor, you're not going to get me01:25:15
kill please please please01:25:20
Not01:25:23
kill01:25:25
this is unclear nay answer me01:25:31
kill Give me at least one compelling01:25:39
argument murder is illegal you will sit in01:25:44
surrendering to prison is not part of my plan01:25:47
plans but kill it01:25:50
bad professor not worth mentioning01:25:53
morals you said that your behavior01:25:55
determined by DNA DNA has no morals01:25:59
abnormal you have abnormal DNA concept01:26:01
and normality is associated with01:26:03
average values and not with01:26:05
the fact that society is good or bad01:26:07
According to the idea that killing is bad01:26:09
society and there is something01:26:10
the average we all are not01:26:12
we belong to the same gene pool01:26:14
but that doesn't mean murder is good01:26:16
but it doesn’t mean that our appearance is bad01:26:19
won't survive if we allow murder01:26:23
you want to say that I will survive01:26:27
Me and mine will survive01:26:30
DNA you're just sick your mind is sick01:26:44
correction I am a person with genetics01:26:46
certain biological01:26:48
predisposition to01:26:50
aggression and murder are in my01:26:53
genes everything according to yours01:26:57
theory this brings us back to the main point01:27:00
question if my entire identity is determined01:27:04
genes Why shouldn't I kill you01:27:06
because from the point of view of science my DNA01:27:08
this obliges me01:27:11
please do please have mercy01:27:15
Have pity, I beg you, it’s not in my genes01:27:18
laid down by Mercy or01:27:23
a pity01:27:27
please me01:27:37
Predator Please I beg you please01:27:42
A beggar doesn't choose01:27:44
professor there is no reason to save you01:27:49
life I think the time has come you see01:27:56
every01:27:58
I have ideas01:28:04
ideas have consequences01:28:07
Indeed this is so and these ideas have01:28:10
consequences in real life01:28:12
school shooting famous shooting01:28:15
arranged01:28:17
two schoolchildren one of01:28:21
there is no such thing as good01:28:24
true evil is all relative01:28:26
observer it's just nature chemistry and01:28:29
mathematics is not Richard's philosophy01:28:31
Dawkins A on his T-shirt from one of01:28:34
these killers were written Natural01:28:36
selection natural selection is01:28:39
materialism01:28:42
please Richard vmn famous author01:28:47
wrote the following in his book we torture because01:28:49
Christ he said Get the communists01:28:51
often repeated God there is no life01:28:54
after death also does not exist, just like01:28:56
punishment for evil we can do whatever01:28:59
want I heard one executioner say I01:29:03
I'm grateful to the God I don't believe in for that01:29:05
that I lived up to this moment when I can01:29:08
give the field to all the evil that is in01:29:10
my heart and this evil poured out on01:29:12
Christians with incredible cruelty and01:29:14
unheard of01:29:16
suffering this is the result01:29:20
materialism and materialism has no01:29:22
no answer to this can be said01:29:25
materialist some kind of sadist what can01:29:27
say materialist to that person01:29:31
as shown in the video we01:29:35
just watched it and I'm sure ours01:29:38
guest of the program Richard Dokin to whom01:29:40
today he gets the most01:29:42
let us say a few words about this01:29:44
Let's listen to what he tells us. Let him01:29:47
will tell us to enlighten us01:29:49
his01:29:51
wisdom ethics is the topic01:29:54
which you touch in the book you say01:29:57
about origin01:29:59
morality in01:30:01
the book of the cease of God has a chapter under01:30:04
title How we define What is01:30:06
good which is essentially the answer to01:30:08
a statement that we should be01:30:10
religious to be kind but you01:30:13
you answer that this is not so in this chapter you01:30:15
present an example of moral01:30:17
progress in history But in short01:30:19
how do we determine what good speech is?01:30:21
not about how you can change something, but how01:30:22
Ovda01:30:24
I think it's actually complicated01:30:28
Sam Haris's question goes too far01:30:32
his book called moral01:30:34
landscape stating what we can determine01:30:37
what's good and what01:30:43
bad suffering - This is bad and how is he01:30:50
considers at the level of common sense01:30:52
sense01:30:54
With01:30:55
it is possible that some philosopher01:30:58
will say no to suffering - This is good This is01:31:01
impossible to refute definitively01:31:03
I just think that these are terrible words I01:31:05
I think most people agreed01:31:07
I wish these were terrible words, but it seems to me01:31:09
that this is consistent with when people01:31:11
they say yes you can say that God01:31:13
no but I think those are terrible words01:31:19
yes, although I think it's not a terrible word01:31:27
No, I have no answer to some sadist01:31:29
who will come and say that suffering01:31:32
This is great I get it What if01:31:36
it was someone who would embody his01:31:39
sadistic tendencies to justify01:31:41
some kind of religious01:31:43
morality how would you explain to this01:31:45
man what He does01:31:47
I feel bad01:31:52
that01:31:55
l01:31:56
people So this is an excerpt from Richard's interview01:32:00
Dawkins to another atheist Alex Ako01:32:02
on the channel Richard Dons doesn’t know how01:32:05
determine what is good and what is evil when I01:32:08
I'm listening to this and I have a question01:32:11
Is this person sick but I will say that he is01:32:13
not sick at all, he's just consistent01:32:16
in his worldview, moreover, he01:32:17
honest vlie01:32:19
from the car01:32:22
talk01:32:25
that they can imagine some01:32:27
basis for objective morality richar01:32:29
Don honestly says there isn’t one, but it’s interesting.01:32:32
that the same Richard Dons will give us01:32:34
talk about how God is evil or evil01:32:37
there is no good, he said it himself but01:32:39
God is evil think about it So let01:32:43
let's summarize the views of materialism01:32:46
Let me sum up my01:32:52
there are no purposeful purposes01:32:55
there is no life after death of any kind01:32:58
I'm absolutely sure that when I die01:33:00
I'll be dead, this is the end for me no01:33:02
There is no absolute basis for ethics01:33:04
there is no meaning in life, just like there is no free01:33:07
will for man So we come to01:33:10
simple conclusions if there is no God01:33:12
there is an objective morality But if01:33:14
God is objective morality cannot help but01:33:17
exist so says the Lord it01:33:19
objective morality I have been in01:33:22
the city of Auschwitz and today the mountain01:33:24
called Auschwitz near Krakow where01:33:26
I live at the moment and there are two01:33:29
Auschwitz camp Bernau Auschwitz probably01:33:31
better known A and Well, in principle it is01:33:34
part of one camp, well, two two01:33:37
sides, so to speak, of the same coin And here I am01:33:40
in the photo I'm standing next to01:33:43
and with the crematorium it is in this place01:33:48
and the Nazis01:33:50
already burned01:33:52
murdered Jews were first gassed01:33:57
cyclone b and then burned occurs01:34:00
question a Is this objective01:34:03
wrong Can we say what it is?01:34:06
absolute evil is objective01:34:07
wrong or all we can say01:34:10
it's that it's just someone's opinion we01:34:13
we can say that this is bad but on what01:34:14
it is based on your opinion against someone01:34:18
when we talk about something01:34:19
objectively wrong what this means01:34:21
that even if Hitler took over the world and01:34:24
convinced everyone of their worldview that this01:34:27
it would still be objectively wrong01:34:29
That is, it would still be evil even01:34:31
if everyone agreed with this That is01:34:33
objective morality does not depend on opinion01:34:36
majority but the materialist cannot01:34:38
to offer this and to such01:34:41
way from the point of view of materialism in01:34:44
basically it’s just, well, just someone’s01:34:47
our opinion is somehow modern01:34:49
some Taboo but think look into01:34:52
your heart Think about it01:34:55
Is rape objective?01:34:58
is bullying wrong01:35:00
abuse of children is objectively wrong01:35:02
is murder objective01:35:04
wrong Ask yourself these questions01:35:06
honestly and answer them if this is true01:35:08
do you really think it's just01:35:11
uh some kind of moral convention is01:35:15
Is morality a social conditioning?01:35:17
just an agreement How to drive around01:35:19
right side or left or whatever01:35:21
morality is something more it should01:35:25
there must be objective morality and or sun01:35:29
what is it's just an opinion But if01:35:31
there is even one thing objectively01:35:33
one thing is objectively wrong01:35:35
action then objective morality must01:35:37
exist and I think that after all we01:35:40
we all agree that this is objective01:35:43
It's wrong to bully children. It's01:35:45
it is objectively wrong to rape but the EU01:35:48
there is obv Mora bo obv01:35:52
bridge01:35:54
exists because it is after all01:35:55
It's objectively wrong to rape01:35:57
It's objectively wrong to mock01:36:00
God must be the children because01:36:03
Only God can be the source01:36:05
objective01:36:06
morality, and some skeptics may01:36:10
to say that atheists can do the same01:36:12
morally but please note that we are not01:36:15
we say that atheists do not act01:36:17
morally the question is not whether they can01:36:20
Not01:36:22
all non-believers Yes act morally and in01:36:26
whether they have a reason for01:36:28
objective morality I do not argue with the fact that01:36:31
there are atheists who act morally01:36:33
than some Christians this is true but01:36:36
If they had an objective basis01:36:39
basis for objective morality01:36:41
the question is also not whether it is necessary01:36:44
believe in God to live morally01:36:46
life or can we01:36:48
formulate an ethical system without01:36:50
God we can agree with the atheist that01:36:52
some will be morally wrong we01:36:55
we can agree If you are a skeptic AI with01:36:58
Why rape you? It’s bad but it makes a difference01:37:01
between you and me will be what I have01:37:03
there is a reason for this and you don’t have it01:37:05
just your opinion, your worldview01:37:07
It's just some kind of convention01:37:10
some kind of01:37:11
Taboo So the point is that without God there is no01:37:14
there is an objective morality So we are with01:37:17
you are talking about the fact that our01:37:20
the world must have a reason our universe01:37:24
she must have a reason, that reason01:37:25
must be outside the universe01:37:28
beyond time, space and01:37:30
matter and then e be eternal A and01:37:34
this reason must also be intangible01:37:37
be omnipotent but because she must01:37:39
create a universe with just01:37:41
mind-blowing amount of energy01:37:43
This reason must be reasonable in order01:37:45
choose create uh also we know that01:37:48
Our Universe is finely tuned01:37:50
there are a number of parameters in the universe that01:37:54
if you change them even a little, it’s nothing01:37:57
the universe will not allow life01:37:59
to exist is another evidence01:38:02
what there should be God should be01:38:04
the reason is also we know that ours01:38:08
our cells our cells are full of different01:38:12
mechanisms of various motors which01:38:14
also testify to the plan we know01:38:17
that all these engines are ours and all ours01:38:19
processes in our body are biological01:38:21
processes in our body are controlled by DNA and01:38:24
DNA contains information01:38:26
information comes only from01:38:28
we are also a reasonable source01:38:30
they said that it should be objective01:38:32
morality that morality is still materialism01:38:35
cannot provide a basis for objective01:38:37
morality This suggests that if01:38:39
there is objective morality Only God01:38:41
may be the source of this morality So01:38:44
we come to the conclusion with you that God01:38:47
must be can't be so God01:38:50
does not exist and I will end with quotes from B Pasley01:38:54
he writes the following openly being that01:38:56
who seeks him with all his heart and hiding from01:38:59
those who run from him with all their hearts God01:39:01
regulates human knowledge about himself01:39:03
gives signs visible to those who seek him and01:39:05
invisible to those who are indifferent to him01:39:08
wants to see he gives enough Light and01:39:11
to those who do not want to See, he gives01:39:13
enough01:39:22
darkness01:39:29
ADescription:
В лекции представлены аргументы в пользу существования Бога в доступной форме. Рассмотрены космологический аргумент, аргумент от тонкой настройки и дизайна в природе, аргумент от информации а так же аргумент от морали. Лекция была впервые опубликована на канале МБАО: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lU977ObA-w 📕Дополнительные статьи по теме: Философские аргументы в пользу существования Бога - https://bibleap.com/filosofskie-argumenty-v-polzu-sushhes/ Логика и атеизм - https://bibleap.com/logika-i-ateizm/ Может ли вселенная быть вечной? - https://bibleap.com/mozhet-li-vselennaya-byt-vechnoy/ Откуда взялась Вселенная? - https://bibleap.com/otkuda-vzyalas-vselennaya/ 👉 ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ НА НАШИ КАНАЛЫ В СОЦ. СЕТЯХ: ✅ВК СООБЩЕСТВО - https://vk.com/bibleap ✅Telegram - https://t.me/bibleap ✅Инстаграм - https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ✅ Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser
Preparing download options
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок" video?
http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "Есть ли Бог? | Доказательства бытия Бога | Владимир Силенок"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.