Download "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU"
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FBb8dB7d3BdE%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.
Table of contents
Similar videos from our catalog
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252F41s8PVomfZk%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi%252FA7XcGC7-0B4%252Fmaxresdefault.jpg&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FLhw0Rxa0S5o%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252FgWYWBT_srJA%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fi.ytimg.com%252Fvi_webp%252Fv7xrYMc8XZk%252Fmaxresdefault.webp&w=1139&q=75)
Video tags
Subtitles
Russian
00:00:01
[Music]00:00:03
[Laughs]00:00:12
it is currently April 2700:00:15
2012 so this is who governs France00:00:19
And00:00:20
Europe I start this conference in00:00:23
placing it under the heading or under00:00:27
the auspice of a Chinese proverb that00:00:29
I like it and who says it's better00:00:31
have the herbette 5 minutes than to00:00:34
stay all your life what is that00:00:36
What does this proverb mean? It means that00:00:38
when you don't understand something00:00:39
something you absolutely must not00:00:42
internalize your lack of00:00:45
understanding you know it's like00:00:47
children or students who are afraid00:00:49
of not knowing that's it and they internalize00:00:51
no when you don't understand00:00:53
something you should not hesitate in00:00:55
anyway that's what this proverb says00:00:57
Chinese you should not hesitate to ask00:00:59
a question even if you seem00:01:00
stupid eh because in reality00:01:02
life experience shows that this00:01:05
are the stupid questions between00:01:06
quotation marks which are often00:01:08
best and as you will see00:01:10
during this conference and we00:01:11
let's ask nine questions together00:01:16
beasts after 14 years at the Élysée00:01:21
and a few weeks before dying00:01:22
François Mitteran delivered his will00:01:26
politics in French France does not00:01:29
don't know but we are at war with00:01:31
America yes a permanent war one00:01:35
vital war an economic war a00:01:38
war without death apparently yes they00:01:42
Americans are very tough, they are00:01:44
voracious they want power without00:01:47
sharing about the world it's a war00:01:49
unknown a permanent war without death00:01:52
apparently and yet a war00:01:55
dead it's not me who says it it's00:01:58
François Mitteran a few weeks00:02:00
before dying in a work which00:02:02
is called the last miteran and00:02:05
confidence he made to the journalist00:02:08
George Marc Benamou at the time00:02:10
journalist at Nouvel Observateur and00:02:12
for those who have doubts I00:02:14
refers to this publication at lead00:02:16
which appeared on January 2700:02:20
1997 normally in a country00:02:22
Normally00:02:24
constituted someone's statement00:02:26
who was head of state president of the00:02:28
Republic for 14 years never one00:02:30
President of the Republic was also00:02:32
for a long time at the Élysée in the history of00:02:33
France and normally such00:02:36
statement should have argued that we00:02:39
asks questions there should have been00:02:41
a great national debate what is00:02:44
miteran had meant just before00:02:46
die like a kind of will00:02:48
policy that he left to the French00:02:50
was nothing, it was the subject of a00:02:53
parrot in a newspaper or two in00:02:55
the world of Le Figaro and then we did00:02:58
silence then the first stupid question00:03:01
what I want to discuss with you is00:03:04
ask yourself the question that has therefore discovered00:03:07
François Mitteran after 14 years00:03:10
passed to the head of France and who00:03:13
also had him diagnosed00:03:16
dark about the fact that our country is in00:03:18
war a permanent war to the death and00:03:21
that the French don't know about it00:03:24
this we must come back to I am an amateur00:03:27
of history because history allows00:03:29
to understand not only the past00:03:32
but also to have an idea about the future00:03:35
and also on the present as there is a00:03:38
African proverb not a proverb00:03:39
Chinese but an African proverb that00:03:41
I like to quote and who the Africans00:03:43
say if you don't know where you're looking00:03:47
Where you come from allows you to00:03:50
understand how a situation arose00:03:53
how it is explained today and00:03:55
what are the developments00:03:56
wait so if you want we00:03:59
will start this conference on who00:04:02
governs France in a way that will00:04:04
surprise you we will come back at the end00:04:06
from the 18th century in England around00:04:11
1770 when King George II George II00:04:15
of the hanover dynasty since you00:04:17
know that the English went00:04:19
look for their monarchs in Germany00:04:21
George I of the Hanover dynasty00:04:24
found confronted towards00:04:26
1771 1770 finds itself confronted with a00:04:31
budget crisis he asks the00:04:33
government to try to find a00:04:36
means of financing the budget of00:04:39
UK and what is invented00:04:42
well he is the prime minister of00:04:44
the time William pit who will have the idea00:04:49
which will make it possible to replenish the00:04:51
British state coffers what is00:04:53
this idea and well he will ask that00:04:56
we tax more the products of the00:04:59
British India Company00:05:01
British East India Company which will00:05:04
look for products especially in China00:05:07
and who does international trade00:05:10
this British India Company00:05:12
as there is the French Company of00:05:13
East Indies for example or the00:05:15
Dutch East India Company these are00:05:17
almost multinational companies00:05:19
in any case who have a monopoly on00:05:21
foreign trade for countries00:05:23
of Europe for each country in Europe00:05:25
concerned and the Compagnie des Indes00:05:27
British will therefore look for some00:05:30
lacquer parties et cetera in China00:05:33
the brings transport them to the00:05:36
port of London or on the shores00:05:39
British and then from there make00:05:40
re-export to the colonies00:05:42
British and in particular this colony00:05:44
which is thriving and with people00:05:46
who are starting to be rich who is the00:05:47
New England who are who is in00:05:50
North America which is the colony00:05:51
British and so what is to decide00:05:54
it is precisely to tax not the00:05:56
British people who live there but00:05:57
to tax rich colonists because we00:06:00
says well that way it won't be seen00:06:02
the British on the spot the people00:06:04
English people will not see a00:06:06
increase in its taxes but00:06:07
On the other hand, we are going to tax the countries00:06:10
the rich colonists and in particular the00:06:12
American settlers that's what's going on00:06:16
give birth to this this event which00:06:19
is a very important event in00:06:21
the history of the world which is the 1600:06:23
December00:06:25
1773 which was called Boston Tea00:06:28
What's that, well you see here00:06:30
those are00:06:31
American settlers of New00:06:34
England they are therefore English English00:06:37
of origin who board a boat00:06:40
of the British East India Company and they00:06:43
take cases of tea and he00:06:46
scales in Boston Harbor in00:06:47
the Atlantic Ocean he throws them it's00:06:50
a gesture of defiance to power00:06:52
British because he Balan because00:06:54
that precisely he refuses to pay the00:06:57
taxes which have increased a lot00:06:59
to finance the British budget00:07:01
so if I talk to you then that in00:07:03
English we said Boston Tea Party that00:07:05
means the Boston tea party00:07:07
it is a revolt against the central state00:07:09
besides those of you who00:07:10
are currently interested in history00:07:12
contemporary American you know00:07:14
that there are very right-wing movements00:07:16
in the United States very anti-federal state and00:07:19
which is called t Pary precisely in00:07:20
reference to this historical event00:07:22
so this historical event why00:07:24
is it important though because00:07:25
that this is the kick-off of the00:07:27
American Revolution 3 years later00:07:30
unblock the same step 2 and a half years00:07:32
after July 4, 1776 on the00:07:35
Declaration of Independence of00:07:36
United States of America then the War of00:07:38
United States of America Liberation00:07:39
against Great Britain that the00:07:42
France will support since Louis00:07:44
send the little girl and rochambau you00:07:46
know and which will end in 1784 with the00:07:49
treaty of versaill which gives00:07:51
independence in the United States of America00:07:53
so what is important is to00:07:55
to see is that this war00:07:57
of independence this revolution00:08:00
American as we will call it which00:08:02
comes 16 years before the taking of the00:08:04
Bastille well it will start then00:08:07
on things totally different from00:08:09
what was the start of the Revolution00:08:10
French the American Revolution00:08:13
started for a rights issue00:08:15
customs our ancestors in 1789 began00:08:19
the revolution was not on a00:08:21
Doig's law problem in 1788 ago00:08:24
had a diet and people had to00:08:27
bad to eat and then he was on a00:08:29
background of political and social discontent of00:08:32
increasingly important since it00:08:34
had to pay precisely there also the00:08:37
state budget in France was00:08:40
extremely deficit and you know00:08:43
that since Charles VI only the third estate00:08:46
had to pay taxes so people00:08:48
the richest in France that is to say00:08:51
the aristocrats and the clergy were00:08:53
exempted from paying taxes therefore00:08:56
French fought launched the00:08:57
French Revolution first and foremost00:09:00
on a principle of equality everyone00:09:02
must pay taxes everyone must00:09:04
vote taxes everyone must00:09:06
vote the budget and then also everything00:09:08
the world must be able to hunt since00:09:09
it's important when we die00:09:11
so we need to hunt gold00:09:13
hunting was reserved the right to hunt00:09:15
was reserved for00:09:17
aristocrats therefore the Revolution00:09:19
American started for a problem00:09:20
of douinee rights and it was launched00:09:22
by wealthy settlers and00:09:25
slaver George Washington who is00:09:28
a Virginia planter who will take00:09:29
the head of the movement which will be the first00:09:31
president of the United States of America00:09:33
independent George Washington dies00:09:35
December 17, 1799 a few days before00:09:38
the year 1800 and when he died in his00:09:41
cotton virginia plantation it has 30000:09:44
black slaves to his00:09:46
disposition therefore the Revolution00:09:48
American claims freedom00:09:50
but the freedom that is claimed is00:09:52
that of commerce is not at all00:09:55
that of their00:09:56
slaves while freedom00:09:58
claimed by French Republic00:10:00
was indeed the freedom of all being00:10:02
human since we therefore had the00:10:04
Bill of Rights first la la00:10:06
night of the abolition of privileges on the 4th00:10:08
August 1789 and then the abolition therefore the00:10:12
Declaration of Human Rights which00:10:14
followed eh in the month of finally in the same00:10:16
moment in June 1789 the00:10:19
Declaration of the Rights of Man and00:10:20
citizen and then I believe that it is00:10:24
1791 92 the abolition of00:10:27
slavery France France we have a little00:10:30
tendency to forget it was the first00:10:32
country in the world to be permanently abolished00:10:34
slavery not just trafficking00:10:36
slaves but slavery followed by00:10:39
Denmark then I remind you that the00:10:41
United States of America will be the last00:10:43
Western country so to speak00:10:45
abolish slavery we will have to wait until00:10:47
end of the Civil War in 186900:10:50
so that they abolish slavery and00:10:52
then the third element is that for the00:10:55
Americans the body the institution which00:10:58
sets the rules from the outside it is00:11:00
the body that directs others00:11:03
they have a commercial vision of the00:11:06
freedom and a vision of commerce00:11:08
international which ultimately is enough00:11:11
foreign to the French vision and in00:11:15
any case was not at all the origin00:11:17
of the revolution that our ancestors had00:11:20
conducted so this allows us to take a look00:11:23
on how the United States sees00:11:25
the world just take a ticket00:11:26
of 1 dollar you have to see it00:11:29
portrait of George Washington the one00:11:31
the owner of 300 black slaves00:11:33
which I was talking about earlier00:11:35
moreover, the United States continues to00:11:37
celebrate as if nothing had happened00:11:40
capital is called Washington George00:11:42
Washington is on all banknotes00:11:44
of 1 dollar which are produced by00:11:46
billions and billions across the00:11:47
planet there is even a State of00:11:49
United States called the State of00:11:50
Washington on the west coast so there00:11:52
not at all I quote it I quote it at00:11:54
passage because you know that we00:11:57
we did not celebrate the encore in France00:11:59
centenary of austerlites on the grounds that00:12:01
Napoleon had reestablished slavery00:12:05
at the request of Joséphine de boarnaet00:12:06
under the Empire for a few years00:12:08
so we had a reread of00:12:10
the story which has been widely00:12:13
publicized on this occasion for00:12:14
make the French feel guilty about their00:12:16
story I'm not there obviously00:12:18
to find circumstances00:12:21
favorable to Napoleon in this case but00:12:23
there are many anachronisms in the00:12:25
reproaches which are made to him nevertheless I00:12:26
just say that this kind of00:12:29
constant desire that there is in France to00:12:31
depreciate ourselves we forgot to specify that00:12:33
France had still been the00:12:35
first country in the world to abolish00:12:36
slavery and we forget to specify that00:12:38
the Americans have never done this00:12:40
work regarding00:12:41
them and then on the reverse of this 1 note00:12:45
dollar that everyone has there is00:12:47
several things that are interesting00:12:48
first there is this inscription in God00:12:51
re trust means we believe in00:12:54
God we place our trust in00:12:57
God this refers to the fact that for00:12:59
Americans have a destiny00:13:01
manifesto of the American people and that it00:13:03
is about building a kind of New00:13:05
Jerusalem on00:13:08
land for Christians at least for00:13:10
Catholics we are dealing here with00:13:12
blasphemy the idea of putting the name of00:13:15
God on a banknote and when00:13:17
even something that goes beyond00:13:19
understanding for those at least who00:13:21
think about the words in the gospels of00:13:23
of Christ who says we must give back to Caesar00:13:25
what is Caesar's and what is God's00:13:27
to God you know in the parable on00:13:30
the denier and what is interesting00:13:32
also on the reverse of this note00:13:34
bank is the sign of the big leap of00:13:37
United States of America where we see a00:13:40
masonic symbol with the date 177600:13:43
because indeed the companies of00:13:45
Freemasonry have been largely00:13:47
the origin of revolutionary principles00:13:49
both in the United States and France00:13:51
but the most interesting thing is elsewhere00:13:53
there is in this banner that there is00:13:55
below you can maybe read it's00:13:58
written in Latin norous00:14:01
sordoclorum is on all the tickets00:14:03
of dollars circulating through the00:14:05
world and which therefore amounts to billions00:14:08
and billions and billions it's not00:14:10
a detail novous Sordo is Chorum00:14:13
It's Latin, it means new00:14:15
order of the centuries the new order of00:14:18
world the new order for centuries00:14:21
centuries so it's a thought00:14:24
typically imperial America esteems00:14:26
have the vocation to set a Christmas order00:14:29
global it is all the more00:14:31
impressive than at the time00:14:34
1700 say at the turn of the 19th century00:14:37
around 1800 there are in the United States 700:14:41
million inhabitants including more than00:14:43
many slaves it's still a whole00:14:45
small country in France for example there is00:14:48
34 million or 32 34 million00:14:50
inhabitants so here is a country which has00:14:54
four times fewer inhabitants than00:14:56
France it is true that France is the00:14:58
the most PE P country in the West but there you go00:15:00
a country that has four times less00:15:01
inhabitants than France, which is emerging from a00:15:03
war of independence and which nevertheless00:15:06
claims to have an imperial vocation we00:15:08
went to see him in 1812 on this example he00:15:11
this time it's Andrew Jackson00:15:13
Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the00:15:16
United States of America but before being00:15:18
elected president he was the general in00:15:21
leader who led a war against the00:15:23
United Kingdom and because once the00:15:25
war of independence was won and00:15:27
it was completed by the Treaty of00:15:29
versaill of 1784 on the independence of00:15:31
United States of America as I said00:15:33
just now the United States did not00:15:35
let down their guard they are continued00:15:36
then to seek to finally to00:15:39
oust British power from00:15:42
North American continent they took advantage00:15:45
wars00:15:46
Napoleonic women to go carry the00:15:48
war in Canada since Canada00:15:50
it was precisely the provinces00:15:53
British from the British colonies00:15:55
of Canada who had remained faithful to the00:15:57
British Crown00:15:59
and so taking advantage you see 1812 it is00:16:03
it's starting to smell like rust00:16:04
Napoleon 1813 is the campaign of00:16:07
Russia the bzina so we will reach00:16:09
but in 1809 1810 1811 the Americans00:16:12
had understood that the English were00:16:14
so busy organizing the blockade00:16:16
continental against France that it was00:16:18
the right time to attack the forces00:16:20
English women who are in Canada, so there you go00:16:23
I cite it because to have recourse00:16:26
there was no professional army in00:16:27
United States at the time but to have00:16:29
therefore resort to an army therefore00:16:31
conscript Andrew Jackson made a00:16:35
a speech which remained known where it00:16:38
said we are going to take advantage of00:16:40
our right to free trade and open00:16:43
the market for the products of our soil in order to00:16:45
to match the exploits of Rome here00:16:48
still something extraordinary this small country of 700:16:51
million00:16:52
of inhabitants still a power00:16:54
totally agricultural which only does00:16:56
the cotton plantations that claim00:16:59
therefore have recourse to the right to free00:17:01
exchange you see clearly that it is00:17:02
still the problem of trade00:17:03
international that we were talking about all the time00:17:04
time to match the exploits of Rome00:17:07
that is to say to transform into00:17:11
then gets worse like this war that they00:17:14
are going to fight this war that they are going to00:17:16
lead uh against the British00:17:19
will not achieve the expected result00:17:23
British settlers of Canada remain00:17:25
loyal to the United Kingdom and therefore despite a00:17:28
number of battles one of the most00:17:30
famous being when the troops00:17:32
English women from Canada came down00:17:34
to the capital Washington and have00:17:36
burn the residence of the president of the00:17:39
United States that it then took00:17:41
repaint white because it was00:17:42
completely blackened by fires and00:17:45
it's since then that we've been calling00:17:46
the White House White House00:17:48
that is to say since it was necessary to00:17:50
repainting after 1812 and conflicts with00:17:53
the British army and well00:17:55
definitively all this culminated in the treaty of00:17:57
Gan in Belgium and where we reached the00:18:01
status quo that is to say that the00:18:03
Americans have not managed to put00:18:05
hand on British Canada then00:18:07
from that moment the Americans00:18:09
will pursue the same objective but00:18:12
in another way they will therefore invent00:18:15
and it is very important to understand this00:18:18
since it is a bit the same war which00:18:20
is brought to us it is the one of which00:18:21
miteran did not understand what she was doing00:18:24
look like they will invent a00:18:26
new a new type of conflict a00:18:28
war which does not say its name and which is00:18:31
perfectly summed up by this report00:18:34
by Isaac Andrews secret agent00:18:36
United States of America reporting to the00:18:38
State Department May 13, 185400:18:41
Department of State is the ministry00:18:43
Foreign Affairs00:18:44
America C This letter is part of00:18:48
historical documents that were00:18:49
exhumed in a book that I00:18:51
recommend at least if the subject00:18:53
interested who is called out of the clutches00:18:55
of the eagle that centuries of resistance00:18:57
Canadian to American expansionism00:18:59
it is a work which was done by a00:19:01
Canadian researcher so what00:19:03
is this an agent00:19:05
secret00:19:06
American who works in Canada to00:19:10
try to get your hands on the benefit of00:19:13
United States over Canada by means00:19:16
warriors who are not a war00:19:18
traditional which are a war of one00:19:19
new guy that's what it's all about and00:19:23
in this report he makes to his00:19:25
superior we reveal this00:19:28
who is the very type of this war00:19:32
so this is what he says with the aim00:19:34
to help movements supporting00:19:37
annexation and free trade in Canada00:19:39
see in his mind free trade00:19:41
with the United States and the annexation of00:19:44
Canada by the United States it is in fact00:19:46
the same thing and it is about helping the00:19:49
movements in Canada that work in00:19:51
this00:19:52
management I paid 5000 dollars to a00:19:55
newspaper editor that means I have00:19:57
corrupt La Presse00:19:59
Canadian I paid 5000 dollars to a00:20:02
attorney general that means I therefore00:20:05
corrupted justice I paid 500000:20:09
dollars to an inspector general I00:20:11
corrupt00:20:12
the administration and I paid 15,00000:20:15
dollars to a deputy so I have I have00:20:17
corrupted the political level of00:20:19
the newbringchevic assembly00:20:21
nouveaubringchevic is one of the00:20:23
federal provinces of Canada that exist00:20:25
always elsewhere which is located00:20:27
currently still to the south-east of00:20:30
Quebec and the north of the state of00:20:32
hand and this is what our00:20:36
our secret agent I took by00:20:38
therefore the measures required by the00:20:40
situation at00:20:41
nouveau-binchevic in order to moderate00:20:44
the opposition and to reassure00:20:46
public opinion then these are00:20:48
words that are really very important00:20:51
to take this war into account00:20:54
it is based on the idea of moderating00:20:56
the opposition and to reassure00:20:58
public opinion because we have00:21:00
bought the media politicians00:21:02
of the country which is the target of this00:21:05
war I managed to get to00:21:07
fredriichtton is the capital00:21:09
provincial of new bringevic before00:21:11
the end of the Assembly session00:21:12
legislative and thus I avoided everything00:21:15
debate on the proposed treaty of00:21:18
free trade under study or on any00:21:19
another harmful legislative measure00:21:21
that is to say we will tranquilize00:21:23
public opinion in this type of00:21:25
war we are going to make a war we are going00:21:27
propose free trade measures00:21:29
because free trade will make00:21:30
so that we will modify the00:21:32
economic structures of the country we will00:21:35
impose an economic model a model00:21:37
social in the targeted country and for00:21:40
to reassure public opinion above all00:21:42
above all, it must not be00:21:43
not at00:21:44
current so we moderate the opposition and00:21:48
we avoid all the debates00:21:51
basically this is what we live in00:21:53
this moment you saw it elsewhere00:21:56
I will have the opportunity to come back to this on this00:21:57
the presidential campaign every00:21:59
real debates are totally obscured00:22:02
eh we don't do it we lather00:22:04
other little debates I will have00:22:05
the opportunity to come back and this is how00:22:07
concludes Mr. Andrw he says I have00:22:09
spent more than $100,000 on00:22:13
convince eminent personalities00:22:14
to support the annexation of Canada by the00:22:16
UNITED STATES00:22:18
or otherwise free trade with00:22:20
United States you can therefore see clearly that in00:22:22
this thought the annexation of Canada by00:22:24
the United States or free trade is00:22:26
a bit the same thing, that is to say that the00:22:27
free trade with the United States00:22:30
will lead00:22:32
gradually to annexation in a way00:22:36
or a00:22:38
other but this sum is nothing in00:22:42
comparison of the privileges which will be00:22:44
obtained permanently and00:22:47
power and influence that this00:22:48
will forever give to our00:22:51
confederation so that's it I think00:22:53
a text that must be read00:22:55
the mind it is decisive because we00:22:57
it's 2000 12 so that's it00:23:00
now 158 years old isn't that00:23:04
text was written and of a certain00:23:06
way we can consider that it gives00:23:08
always the key to understanding the00:23:12
how this war works00:23:14
unknown that François Mitteran spoke about00:23:18
regarding France war00:23:20
unknown led by00:23:24
United States so this this this uh this00:23:29
strategy C was not a coup00:23:32
in the water if I dare say we find it00:23:34
throughout American history 600:23:36
years later in 1860 it is the consul00:23:38
American in Montreal who writes to his00:23:40
hierarchical superior the secretary00:23:42
of American state Levis casass that we00:23:45
seen here in a full-length statue00:23:47
marble uh in the United States Senate and he00:23:49
writes him the free trade treaty00:23:51
between the United States of America and Canada00:23:53
because they had succeeded in imposing a00:23:55
first free trade treaty signed00:23:57
of free trade does not mean that00:23:59
everything circulates freely that means that00:24:00
we have already dismantled some00:24:02
protections on certain specialties00:24:04
customs so this is what writes the00:24:05
conceived he says the free trade treaty00:24:07
between the United States and Canada is in00:24:09
quietly transforming but00:24:11
surely quietly but surely00:24:14
the five Canadian provinces in state00:24:18
of union with one with an opinion00:24:21
public who does not understand00:24:23
nothing in 1888 28 years later we have the00:24:27
senator cherman00:24:29
who is an AO Republican he is a00:24:31
very important man at the time since00:24:32
he is the president of the commission of00:24:34
foreign affairs of the Senate so it is00:24:36
number 2 in American diplomacy00:24:38
after the minister he has and that is a00:24:41
for now it's no longer documents00:24:42
confidential like the ones I just00:24:44
to present this is the report00:24:46
official of the Senate of August 7, 1888 he00:24:50
said I want Canada to be part00:24:53
of the United States you see that it is a00:24:54
constant in American history00:24:57
union with can00:24:59
prick up your ears union with Canada00:25:01
will not be done by passing laws00:25:03
hostile but rather by making him00:25:06
friendly proposals it's a war00:25:09
which will use a spring that we had00:25:11
never used so much before which00:25:13
is war by00:25:16
seduction this union is inevitable00:25:19
the idea also of availing oneself of a00:25:21
kind of inevitability00:25:23
historical the only policy of our00:25:25
government is to offer Canada the00:25:27
freedom of trade and00:25:30
make this proposition to him in a manner00:25:31
fraternal so that the Canadian people00:25:34
sees it as an invitation to be part of00:25:36
OUR00:25:37
Republic as you see in00:25:39
reality this strategy works and does not00:25:41
it doesn't work in a certain way00:25:43
works sinceeffectively00:25:45
gradually Canada enters00:25:47
the American orbit but it does not00:25:48
still doesn't work perfectly00:25:50
since besides just look00:25:51
even today Canada does not have00:25:53
still not been fagociated by the00:25:56
United States after the Second War00:25:58
world the United States will push00:26:00
even further this strategy00:26:01
vis-à-vis Canada it was in 1948 when he00:26:03
proposes a free trade treaty00:26:05
ultimate as he says that is to say that he00:26:07
everything will now be able to circulate00:26:09
completely freely between00:26:10
United States and Canada Whatever00:26:12
customs specialties so there are00:26:14
it is ultimately the abolition of customs00:26:16
this is what we are going to impose00:26:18
gradually to Europe I'm going there00:26:19
come in a moment as part of00:26:21
European construction and John00:26:23
Deutch which at the time is despite00:26:25
his name is Canadian he is the00:26:27
chief negotiator on the Canadian side of00:26:29
this draft free trade treaty00:26:30
ultimate which arouses at the time in 194800:26:33
great concern among the population00:26:37
Canadian and in the Parliament of Tawa there you go00:26:40
what he says he says the price to pay for00:26:42
a customs union with the United States00:26:44
and the loss of our independence00:26:47
political in the sense that we will not have00:26:49
no longer effective control of our00:26:51
national policies these will be00:26:53
decided in Washington so you see00:26:56
well this diabolical mechanism00:26:59
undercovered to have a a treaty of00:27:02
free trade that interests no one00:27:04
because it seems technical subjects00:27:06
ultimately the government00:27:09
Canadian itself recognizes that we00:27:11
that they will no longer have the00:27:13
control of national policies that it00:27:15
will be decided on that comes down to saying in00:27:17
definitive that democracy no longer has00:27:18
meaning it's an attack on the00:27:20
democracy which it is about eh we must not00:27:23
to have an illusion then at the time that00:27:25
caused enough trouble00:27:28
and stir so that the Prime Minister00:27:31
Canadian at the time refused this treaty00:27:33
free trade a small assessment on the00:27:36
how the00:27:38
United States of America there is no00:27:41
example in the world of a State which has00:27:43
constituted in this way first you00:27:45
have the first 13 colonies and then00:27:48
which began to spread towards00:27:50
the west by going elsewhere to proceed to00:27:53
a genocide of the Indians and then00:27:55
therefore conquer lands from the inden00:27:58
share them create new states00:28:00
spread and then they are00:28:03
moved to a diplomacy of money and00:28:06
of00:28:07
trade in 1803 the United States buys00:28:11
Louisiana to France Louisiana that00:28:13
is not the state of Louisiana which is00:28:15
here currently Louisiana is00:28:17
all this eh it goes all the way to Montana00:28:20
to Wyoming, Colorado and so on00:28:22
all this all this part is a00:28:24
episode of our history that I don't have00:28:26
never learned of course to our00:28:28
fellow citizens, especially our young people00:28:30
fellow citizens must above all never let them00:28:31
have the impression that they are the00:28:33
heirs of a great country but Canada00:28:36
much of the United States had00:28:37
was discovered by the French00:28:39
Cavelier de La Salle and therefore all that00:28:41
all these immense lands about a00:28:43
third of the American continent not of00:28:46
from the from the American territory00:28:49
continental belonged to France therefore00:28:52
Napoleon sells Louisiana for 2000:28:54
million gold francs to the government00:28:56
American it must be said that he did not have00:28:58
really the choice since Napoleon being00:29:00
in its continental blockade and well it00:29:02
couldn't go protect his00:29:03
territories in reality elsewhere00:29:06
could he have done it he wouldn't have been there00:29:08
arrived because the problem if the00:29:10
United States the United States would very00:29:12
could well become French-speaking if they do not00:29:14
haven't been it's for a reason everything00:29:16
completely structural is that France00:29:18
began its demographic transition to00:29:20
from the Regency, that is to say that the00:29:22
number of children born by women00:29:24
French began to decline00:29:25
drastically and therefore there was no longer00:29:27
of human surplus to populate the00:29:30
North American colonies while00:29:31
same time the English even more the00:29:33
The Irish had a human surplus00:29:36
considerable so there was a flow00:29:37
constant English-speaking population which00:29:39
arrived in the United States when there00:29:41
had no population flow00:29:43
French speaking so Americans buy00:29:45
Louisiana to France in 1803 they go00:29:47
buy part of Arizona at00:29:49
Mexico in00:29:51
1853 they will buy Alaska which is00:29:54
actually not here but who is in it is00:29:57
outside of the card they will buy00:30:00
Alaska to the Russian Empire in00:30:03
1867 to Alexander II the liberator Dar00:30:07
serfs you know moreover that the00:30:10
the Russians will bite their fingers00:30:13
later they bought the island of00:30:16
Guam to Spain in 1898 Guam is located00:30:18
at the other end of the Pacific south of00:30:21
Present day Japan they bought the islands00:30:23
Philippines to Spain in 1898 a00:30:26
archipelago off the coast of Viet vinam that you00:30:28
gift that you no doubt visualize on00:30:30
the card eh which bears the name of00:30:32
Philippine named after Philip II the son00:30:34
charlequin at the other end of the00:30:36
Pacific they bought Puerto Rico at00:30:38
Spain in 1898 they annexed the islands00:30:42
Hawa following free agreements00:30:43
exchange in 1898 they annexed the00:30:46
Carolines Mariana Islands with00:30:48
free trade agreements they bought00:30:50
the virgin islands in Denmark in 1917 we00:30:53
no historical example of a state00:30:56
which was developed by money00:30:58
corruption and international trade00:31:01
and free trade agreements are00:31:03
very important what I say there because00:31:05
that this is what is happening to us00:31:06
come to us since the construction00:31:08
European is a first stage00:31:10
second stage which has started eh00:31:12
which is even if no one is there00:31:14
current but the European Parliament has00:31:16
voted is to move to the big market00:31:18
transatlantic which is the moment when the00:31:20
United States will definitely put the00:31:22
hand on the European continent eh00:31:24
the same00:31:25
way so here we are now arrived00:31:28
in 1950 with Robert Schuman who is here00:31:31
in the clock room at kedorset00:31:33
and who made this famous declaration of00:31:35
May 900:31:36
1950 which we are asked to consider in00:31:39
France is a wonderful00:31:41
declaration that it is a stroke of genius00:31:43
there is moreover how would we say it is00:31:45
we celebrate Europe you know on May 900:31:48
this is the Schuman declaration in this00:31:50
Schuman declaration then I return00:31:52
those who are interested in a file00:31:54
which I put online on our site00:31:56
popular union Republic00:31:58
where I dissect who Robert was00:32:00
Schuman eh who was in fact a00:32:04
someone from someone a very man00:32:06
original curator and who had a00:32:09
extremely disordered behavior under00:32:12
the Occupation he was born in Germany he00:32:14
was born German before before the00:32:15
First World War under00:32:18
the Occupation he had an extremely role00:32:19
trouble I will come back to it in a00:32:21
moment and then it was 14 times00:32:23
minister under the 4th Republic therefore00:32:25
this was while he was minister00:32:26
of foreign affairs what did this00:32:28
statement which you will see if you00:32:30
read my file that this statement00:32:32
in fact it's not him at all who got it00:32:34
written or even invented it was only a00:32:36
spokesperson for a statement that was00:32:38
designed written written in the Department00:32:41
of American state in the services of00:32:43
diniterson and which was transmitted to him00:32:45
by Jean Monet so that's what Robert says00:32:48
Schuman, Europe will not be created in one go00:32:50
suddenly nor in an overall construction00:32:53
it will be done through achievements00:32:54
concrete actions first creating solidarity00:32:56
party the pooling of00:32:58
coal and steel production00:32:59
will immediately ensure the establishment00:33:01
common basis of development00:33:03
economic first stage of the00:33:04
federation00:33:06
European which is very interesting00:33:08
in this so-called Schuman declaration of 900:33:10
May 1950 is to put it in relation to00:33:14
the cherman statement which I have00:33:16
spoken earlier about 1888 by the senator00:33:19
republican of00:33:20
Ohio because it's interesting00:33:23
is that we not only have the00:33:24
same underlying idea but practically00:33:27
even the same musicality of the phrase to00:33:30
believe that approximately between 1888 and00:33:34
1950 62 years have passed believing that00:33:37
it's the same feather that held both00:33:40
speech I want Canada to make00:33:42
part of the United States the Union with the00:33:44
Canada will not be achieved by adopting00:33:46
hostile laws but rather by making him00:33:48
friendly proposals declaration00:33:50
cherman Europe will not be created in one00:33:52
suddenly nor in an overall construction00:33:54
it will be done through achievements00:33:55
concrete first creating a ground00:33:57
solidarity in declaration00:34:00
said the only policy of our00:34:02
government is to offer Canada the00:34:03
freedom of trade and00:34:05
make this proposition to him in a manner00:34:06
fraternal so that the Canadian people00:34:08
sees it as an invitation to be part of00:34:10
our republic cherman declaration00:34:14
1888 the pooling of productions00:34:16
coal and Assé will ensure00:34:17
immediately the base establishment00:34:18
economic development municipality00:34:19
first stage of the Federation00:34:21
European Schuman declaration of 195000:34:25
in other words the so-called method00:34:27
Schuman currency you know from cradle to00:34:29
the grave in France it seems that it is necessary00:34:31
to be ecstatic before the alleged genius00:34:34
of Jean-Monet and Robert Schuman they00:34:36
are entitled to colleges at avenues to00:34:38
squares streets boulevards they00:34:40
are entitled to a commemoration00:34:43
constant in reality it was only a00:34:46
simple plagiarism more exactly what00:34:48
was only sponsors we will I00:34:50
I'm going to talk about it right away since00:34:52
this Mony Schuman method is00:34:54
exactly the method invented and implemented00:34:55
developed by the United States since after00:34:58
1812 after the failure isn't it00:35:01
conflict with Canada when they00:35:03
invented this new type of war by00:35:06
the intermediary of free trade then00:35:09
All this brings me to talk to you about this00:35:11
momentous revelation which was hidden from00:35:14
French than, moreover, the French of00:35:16
from the 1950s at least those who00:35:18
listened to the Communist Party00:35:19
the time knew very well since the00:35:21
Communist Party developed ideas00:35:23
which are not entirely relevant00:35:25
unrelated to those I present00:35:27
the French Communist Party00:35:28
explained to the French in the years00:35:30
1550 as European construction00:35:32
was actually an American invention00:35:35
French Communist Party no longer exists00:35:37
it's just one, it has nothing left to do00:35:39
see what it was but it didn't00:35:42
remains no less than the Party00:35:43
French communist from the 50s who00:35:44
he had the geopolitical analyzes and00:35:47
strategic agents from Moscow explained00:35:49
very good what was the construction00:35:51
European he found himself elsewhere00:35:52
perfectly with de Gaul's thinking00:35:54
and the Gaulists in the 1950s for00:35:57
denounce this takeover so in fact I00:35:59
almost only kicks down doors00:36:02
open to people who are over00:36:03
60 or 70 years old now but00:36:06
unfortunately for all French people00:36:08
who were born say from 1955 or00:36:11
60 and especially those who were born00:36:13
after 1975 or 80 or 90 well we don't00:36:17
never told them the truth yet who00:36:19
has been irrefutably revealed00:36:22
now by this revelation hidden in00:36:24
French in an article in the Daily00:36:27
Telegraph of September 19, 2000 it is00:36:28
what the Daily Telegraph is one of00:36:30
largest newspapers in the world one of the00:36:32
the most serious newspapers are the00:36:34
Britain's biggest selling quality daily00:36:36
that means quality everyday life00:36:38
most sold in the UK you know that00:36:40
the British read a lot00:36:41
press it's not at all a tabableoid00:36:44
it's not gutter press00:36:45
as they say it's a newspaper00:36:47
Eurocritical conservative who has a00:36:50
quality recognized almost equal to00:36:53
Times and so in this in this issue of the00:36:56
September 19, 2000 the journalist who is00:36:58
one of the most famous journalists in the world00:37:00
United Kingdom made an article00:37:03
sensation called Ambrose Evans00:37:05
spitchard the journalist in question00:37:07
since he went to stick his nose in00:37:10
confidential defense documents00:37:12
US government state secret00:37:15
which have been declassified by00:37:16
the American administration in the summer of 200000:37:19
since there are laws of00:37:20
declassification of secret documents00:37:22
defense which imposes on the government00:37:24
American to publish after 30 years00:37:27
secret documents while in00:37:29
other countries like France must00:37:30
wait 50 70 years or even 100 years and therefore00:37:33
he went to make an observation so here it is00:37:36
a translation for those who are00:37:37
interested I send them to our site00:37:40
where there is the full text of this00:37:42
article and therefore says therefore ambise EV00:37:46
richchard of the secret documents of00:37:48
American government who come00:37:50
to be declassified shows that the00:37:52
secret service community00:37:54
Americans led a campaign throughout00:37:56
throughout the 50s and 60s in order to00:37:59
promote unification00:38:02
European leaders of the movement00:38:04
European Retinger the visionary Robert00:38:08
Schuman and the former Prime Minister00:38:10
Belgian Paul Henis Sparac supported all00:38:12
treated as employees by their00:38:14
godparents00:38:16
Americans the role of the United States was00:38:19
camouflaged as for an operation00:38:21
secret money from the Que AC C u e it's00:38:25
an acronym for American00:38:28
united Europe american committee for a00:38:30
United Europe which is already a whole00:38:33
program itself came from the Foundation00:38:35
Ford of the Rockefellers, that is to say00:38:37
foundations00:38:38
private because the interventions of00:38:41
American secret services like the CIA00:38:43
often travel under false names or00:38:46
private sponsors like Foundation00:38:48
Ford and Rockefeller these days there are00:38:50
always Ford Rockfam there is also IBM00:38:53
Microsoft pricewer house Coopers and00:38:56
cetera et cetera or Boeing or UPS which00:38:59
are front companies that allow00:39:01
to give for example to make funds00:39:03
foundations that give money to00:39:04
this or that pro-European think tank00:39:07
I will talk about it later but who00:39:09
are in reality in part in any case in00:39:12
perfect communication with the services00:39:14
of American influence therefore the money of00:39:17
that came from strong foundations00:39:18
Rockefellers as well as middle00:39:20
business people with close ties to00:39:22
the us government department00:39:24
State also played a role00:39:28
emanating from the Europe department and therefore from00:39:31
Ministry of Foreign Affairs00:39:32
American dated June 1100:39:35
1965 advises the vice-president of the00:39:38
European Economic Community to00:39:39
the era called Robert Marjolin00:39:42
to continue surreptitiously00:39:45
camouflage the objective of a union00:39:47
monetary union00:39:50
European it is very important to00:39:52
understand excuse me these are00:39:54
sensational information the big one00:39:58
our common European currency does not00:40:00
was at all a French invention or00:40:02
to Franco-German or even European00:40:04
it's been since00:40:06
1965 is 47 years since the United States00:40:10
advised the EC to create a union00:40:13
monetary00:40:14
European and this note recommends I00:40:18
quote I quote not only the article00:40:20
but the article itself cites the note in00:40:22
question this note recommends00:40:24
to prevent any debate until the moment00:40:27
where the adoption of such a proposal00:40:29
would become virtually00:40:31
inevitable it's fascinating to prevent everything00:40:34
debate you remember it was00:40:36
exactly the very term used by00:40:39
secret agent Isaac Andrews in 185400:40:43
when he reported to the Department00:40:45
of State I prevented everything00:40:48
therefore debate the constant of the of this00:40:52
strategy of American domination00:40:54
see here bursting it takes all its00:40:56
relief with perspective00:40:58
history that I just made under00:41:01
your00:41:02
eyes we are there besides we00:41:04
we are in a period of our00:41:07
our history where France is therefore00:41:09
the object and we will see it00:41:10
now of this American strategy00:41:13
of this permanent and unknown war00:41:15
that Mitéran discovered and we are00:41:19
in this situation we have to00:41:22
the ban on having real debates00:41:24
all real debates are prevented and00:41:26
we will see how then now00:41:29
we know what to expect about the00:41:31
founding fathers of the beautiful idea00:41:33
European as they say Robert Schuman00:41:35
which is considered a very large00:41:36
man in reality I allow myself to00:41:38
remember that he voted full00:41:39
powers to Pétin at the end of the and the00:41:42
end of the 3rd republic he was a deputy00:41:44
and he was an Avichi deputy he voted for00:41:47
full powers all the same while that00:41:49
never part of his00:41:51
historiography how would I say00:41:53
usual that we cite in the preos00:41:56
secondary schools he was a member00:41:58
from the first Pétin government in Vichi to00:42:00
the Liberation moreover we told him00:42:03
people still have him we have him00:42:04
asked for accounts he made it known00:42:05
that he was not aware he was not00:42:09
not aware that he was a member of the00:42:10
government then it passed it was00:42:13
the first member of the government of a00:42:15
government to go meet the00:42:18
Nazi authorities to my we don't know00:42:20
besides what he said after that he00:42:22
was it true imprisoned by the00:42:24
Nazis because he acted as we know00:42:27
not very well, in any case he00:42:28
escaped and spent the rest of00:42:30
the Second World War in00:42:32
convents at the Liberation he was threatened00:42:35
of national indignity since the00:42:37
communists on one side the goolists of00:42:39
the other wanted his skin because he00:42:40
knew he was a guy who had00:42:41
in any case that's the reputation he had00:42:43
at the time who was a collaborator except that00:42:47
at the time it was the period of00:42:49
the purge and de Gaulle did not want00:42:51
did not want us to calm the PLA and00:42:53
that we do not maintain a climate of00:42:55
civil war in France and wanted it00:42:57
especially since P1 and the Vatican00:42:59
had intervened in favor of Robert00:43:02
Schuman who was close to the00:43:05
how would I say political parties00:43:06
Christian Democrats and therefore de Gaulle00:43:09
saved him from this national indignity00:43:12
which prevented them from pursuing a00:43:13
he also has a political career00:43:14
perfectly taken advantage of I refer you to00:43:16
my file on our site since it has00:43:18
served 14 times as Minister of Affairs00:43:21
foreigners under the 4th Republic which00:43:23
shows that he had a special talent00:43:25
to play eels and it's it's00:43:27
he who apparently had this stroke of genius00:43:29
of the Schuman declaration of May 9, 195000:43:32
I will send this back to my file for00:43:33
show for you to discover00:43:35
why is all this one is one is one00:43:38
in fact it's obviously not him00:43:40
who came up with this idea anyway?00:43:42
now know for sure and00:43:44
certain since September 19, 200000:43:46
that he was treated as an employee by00:43:48
its American agents so in fact00:43:51
financed by the CIA as for jean-mononet00:43:54
jean-monet spent the whole second00:43:56
world war in the United States it was00:43:58
Roosevelt's delegate to the00:43:59
General Girot in Algiers to try to00:44:02
block the road to scab and encourage00:44:03
the former vichists rally to the Allies00:44:06
since it's one of the great episodes00:44:08
of the Second World War that the00:44:10
people don't know that we are00:44:11
young compatriots do not know00:44:13
it is that Roosevelt and the Americans00:44:15
wanted to keep Pétin and Laval in the00:44:19
head of France at the Liberation and that00:44:21
gradually they were forced to00:44:23
change foot after Pétin Laval they00:44:25
are drawn back to Dar00:44:27
how would I say the Resistance00:44:31
French killed Dararlan in Algiers00:44:33
then they fell back on girud who00:44:35
was an old petanism but everything00:44:37
except de Gaulle since de Gaulle was00:44:40
national independence while00:44:41
United States wanted to get its hands on00:44:42
France at the Liberation I remind you00:44:45
moreover that the Americans have00:44:47
maintained an embassy in Vichy until00:44:50
november00:44:51
1942, that is to say practically 1 year00:44:54
after they went to war00:44:55
themselves against Japan after pear00:44:58
Harbor which dates from December 7, 1941 and00:45:00
then with him we went to war00:45:03
with Germany and the powers of00:45:05
the axis therefore means that the00:45:07
United States refused to recognize the00:45:09
Free France until00:45:12
1944 in any case de Gaul said to00:45:14
jean-monet that he was a patient before00:45:16
all concerned with serving the Americans00:45:18
it's in the book it was by Gaul00:45:20
perfit volume 2 page 214 then we00:45:25
we now also know that Paul Henry00:45:26
spa00:45:27
former Belgian Prime Minister was00:45:29
financed by the CIA that the movement00:45:31
European was financed by the CIA of00:45:34
least until December 31, 1969 I00:45:36
indicates that the European movement00:45:38
continues to exist that he called for00:45:40
vote YES to the European Constitution00:45:42
that he said yes to the Treaty of Maastricht00:45:44
yes to the European Constitution which00:45:46
welcomed the adoption of the Treaty of00:45:48
Lisbon which is a felony while00:45:50
55% of French people voted no and this00:45:53
European movement was chaired for its00:45:55
version for its French if I dare say00:45:58
was chaired and finally vice-chaired during00:46:01
several years by Daniel00:46:04
agree then there is no need00:46:08
to finally pick up from noon to 2 p.m.00:46:10
and go look at so many documents00:46:13
confidential defense for00:46:15
convince her00:46:18
the irrefutability of the analyzes that I00:46:21
do it's not I I I know that00:46:25
some will say ah it’s a conspiracy00:46:27
it's not all conspiracy00:46:28
what I say is sourced cited00:46:31
references everyone can go to them00:46:33
see but in addition to that the events00:46:36
the most recent declarations00:46:38
most recent00:46:40
confirm more or less recent by00:46:43
example who first had the idea of a00:46:47
European Constitution which said nothing00:46:50
could not be more pleasant to us than00:46:53
to learn that the States of Europe00:46:54
Western countries have decided to bring together00:46:56
a city in Europe say in Luxembourg00:46:58
responsible delegates with the mandate00:47:00
to draft the constitutional act of00:47:02
Europe to designate the capital and that00:47:05
from January 1st Europe00:47:07
Western will work as00:47:08
federation so some will say but00:47:10
it is adenhauer Paul Henry SP de Gaul and00:47:14
cetera well no the answer is00:47:16
American General Dwight Eisenhauer who00:47:20
was supreme commander of the forces of00:47:21
NATO in Europe in 1951 this00:47:25
declaration before being elected in 5200:47:27
President of the United States of America those00:47:30
of you who want to check mdir00:47:33
should refer to Paris magazine00:47:35
Match number 136 of October 27, 1951 page00:47:39
18 it's not difficult to find it00:47:41
just go to ebay I do the00:47:43
free advertising and typing by image00:47:46
136 October 27, 1951 there are always00:47:48
on sale so buy some and00:47:50
refer to page 18 but of all00:47:52
way we also have the scans of00:47:54
this of this of this uh how00:47:57
would I say of this interview and in00:47:59
this interview the general chief agent to00:48:02
of American armies in Europe says00:48:04
no decision could make us better00:48:06
help in the task that we00:48:10
let's continue in the same way which asks00:48:12
firmly Turkey's entry into00:48:14
the European Union which said I am00:48:16
firm in my support for the candidacy00:48:18
of Turkey I believe very firmly00:48:21
that one of the four or five questions00:48:22
for this part of the world is to know00:48:24
whether Turkey will become a partner of00:48:27
full rights of the European Union00:48:29
no one who said that it's not at all00:48:30
a European it is the president00:48:32
William Clinton Bill Clinton for00:48:35
media president of the United States in a00:48:38
press conference in Ankara capital00:48:41
Turkish on November 15, 1999 at the end of00:48:44
his interview with President Suleiman00:48:46
of Mirel that we see here which is00:48:48
since deceased for those00:48:50
who would be like Saint-Thomas I00:48:51
refers to the dispatch from Agence France00:48:53
Press from November 15, 1999 at 3:30 p.m.00:48:57
and Bill Clinton saying I will continue to00:49:00
make me00:49:01
the lawyer is also a photo that00:49:03
was taken during the interview00:49:05
the outcome of which Clinton made this00:49:08
statement then I insist on a00:49:10
still very important aspect too00:49:13
it is that when the president of00:49:15
United States demands that Turkey enter00:49:17
in the European Union there is no00:49:20
no State of the European Union for00:49:23
protest to recall your ambassador00:49:26
to yours this is what we generally do00:49:29
recalls its ambassador to00:49:30
consultation to show disagreement00:49:32
fundamental with a state do we00:49:35
imagine the reaction that00:49:37
would be that of Washington if by00:49:39
example the President of the Republic00:49:41
French or Italian Prime Minister00:49:43
President of the Italian Council went00:49:45
for example in Caracas00:49:48
or in Mexico and said I am firm in00:49:50
my support and I want Mexico00:49:52
enters the United States00:49:54
from America obviously immediately00:49:56
Washington would cause a global scandal00:49:58
would recall his ambassador to Paris or00:50:01
in Rome or Madrid saying that it is00:50:03
gross interference in the00:50:05
internal affairs of the United States00:50:07
no state in Europe was found to00:50:09
even if only to protest in the face of00:50:12
this kind of00:50:14
declaration we see moreover in00:50:16
passage that it is the United States which00:50:18
demand the entry of Turkey and we00:50:20
We will explain later why the00:50:21
United States wants to bring in00:50:23
Türkiye in the European Union because00:50:24
that the French don't understand eh00:50:26
absolutely don't understand why00:50:28
Turkey should enter who invited00:50:31
officially all the countries of the00:50:33
Baltic to the Black Sea i.e.00:50:35
all Eastern countries to join00:50:37
NATO and the European Union who is it00:50:40
who told all the news00:50:41
democracies of Baltic Europe00:50:43
the Black Sea and every saddle that00:50:45
found located between the two must00:50:47
have the same chance for safety and00:50:50
freedom and the same chance of00:50:52
join the European institutions00:50:54
all nations should understand00:50:57
that there is no conflict between00:50:59
membership of NATO and00:51:00
membership of the European Union00:51:03
normally if the European Union were00:51:05
made a little sense it's a00:51:08
statement which perhaps could have been00:51:09
made by the President of the Republic00:51:11
French chancelly of Germany I do not00:51:12
don't know what, not the person at all00:51:14
who made this statement is the00:51:16
US President George W Bush00:51:19
President of the United States in his00:51:21
speech at the University of Warsaw on00:51:23
June 15, 2001 and moreover insisting in00:51:26
saying we welcome a00:51:28
Truly united Europe so if we have00:51:32
carried out the enlargement of the countries of00:51:34
the East in very very quickly 10 countries00:51:37
new suddenly in 2004 in 2005 and00:51:40
two other new countries in 200700:51:42
Bulgaria and Romania it's because00:51:44
the United States has it00:51:50
demanded who called on the French to vote00:51:53
YES to the European Constitution in 200500:51:56
who said we strongly supported00:51:58
the European project its completion thus00:52:01
that the European Union from our point of view00:52:02
view of the continued success of the00:52:04
European construction is important00:52:07
well the answer is Madame00:52:08
condolisa Rice who is secretary who00:52:12
was US Secretary of State00:52:13
Minister of American Foreign Affairs00:52:15
asked about the referendum in France00:52:17
she trampled on all uses00:52:19
diplomatic since she made this00:52:22
statement which is an interference00:52:23
rude in domestic affairs00:52:25
French and she did it00:52:26
extra while she was visiting00:52:28
in Lithuania it was April 21, 200500:52:31
with following an interview with the00:52:33
Lithuanian President Mr Adam00:52:36
so we see clearly that in all00:52:38
case these are indeed the00:52:40
United States which defines what must be00:52:43
the perimeter of the European Union which00:52:45
bring in the countries they believe00:52:47
having to bring in et cetera and00:52:50
cetera then we come to the second00:52:53
question00:52:54
stupid but why the United States00:52:58
of America push so much00:53:01
European construction because N00:53:02
a [ __ ] when I'm at school when00:53:06
I am in middle school in high school when00:53:08
I listen to television and radio when I00:53:10
read the newspapers when I read them00:53:12
profession of faith of each other00:53:14
when I listen to men and women00:53:16
French politicians I am convinced00:53:18
one thing is that the construction00:53:20
European it seems intended to make00:53:22
counterweight to00:53:24
United States then if what I am told00:53:27
since I was born is true but00:53:29
how come the united states00:53:31
push so much for a construction00:53:33
whose objective would be to harm them00:53:36
doesn't make sense or as it is00:53:39
undeniable that it is the United States00:53:42
which pushes for European construction00:53:44
there is only one logical conclusion to it00:53:46
pull is what you are told is00:53:48
a lie and if the United States00:53:51
push for European construction00:53:53
it is obviously that it serves them and that00:53:56
European construction therefore does not have00:53:57
vocation to make them00:53:59
counterbalance otherwise everything I just00:54:02
tell you all these quotes all00:54:03
these actions of the United States have no00:54:07
sense then to understand why the00:54:10
United States pushes for construction00:54:12
European and well you have to look at a00:54:15
a little bit about the strategy and in particular00:54:17
the chain ploy which is a00:54:20
Chinese invention that was studied00:54:22
in all the war schools of the00:54:23
world including the United States00:54:26
Chinese are art specialists00:54:28
of the war you know the work00:54:30
of sunse sunseu who lived in - 50000:54:33
before Jesus Christ and who left a00:54:35
work on the war which remained00:54:38
very famous very fine a very fine00:54:41
analysis with strategic precepts00:54:44
which are still studied 2500 years later00:54:47
but there is another work very00:54:48
interesting called the 3600:54:51
stratagenes secret manual of the art of00:54:53
war we don't know that he wrote we00:54:56
knows that it appeared in the Ming dynasty00:54:59
i.e. around the 15th century00:55:01
after Jesus Christ it is in fact the00:55:04
collection of wartime Russians who were00:55:07
developed over centuries and00:55:09
millennia since you know that00:55:10
Chinese history goes back very, very00:55:13
old it's starting to at least less00:55:16
2000 BC min00:55:20
2500 in these schemes which are a00:55:23
party founded on the book of y King the00:55:27
Book of Transformations so there are00:55:29
36 and the interesting one00:55:32
to study it is this one who is Lian00:55:36
ran Lian ranch is the ploy of00:55:41
chains this is the 35th of 36 stratagems00:55:45
archinois classics of war00:55:47
defined under the Ming dynasty and what says00:55:50
this stratagem well he says that he00:55:53
consists of pushing an enemy to00:55:56
to hinder oneself to hinder oneself00:56:00
himself in absurd bonds and00:56:03
self-locking which will remove all00:56:06
strategic and tactical mobility and which00:56:09
will prevent him from being able to defend himself00:56:13
then there is an example that is explained00:56:16
in one of the editions of these00:56:19
36 stratagè which is the example00:56:23
next we are at the time of00:56:25
Warring States00:56:27
and so there are two armies that are on00:56:28
leanen of the great Chinese rivers which00:56:32
must fight with ships that00:56:34
have to fight for a few days00:56:36
after and in the first camp the general00:56:40
brings in one of these advisors and00:56:43
advisor tells him I suggest that we00:56:45
implement the stratagem of00:56:47
chines the general says agree in what00:56:50
it consists and well this advisor of00:56:52
camp a will disguise itself as a peasant and will00:56:58
go see camp B which is several00:57:01
kilometers downstream on the00:57:03
river he goes to see the general as if00:57:06
nothing was it's he playing00:57:08
spies the general receives him and as he00:57:11
see this peasant who looks reassured and smart00:57:14
he shows him his armada and therefore peasant00:57:17
pretends to be very impressed00:57:18
oh my really00:57:21
wonderful and at that moment the spy00:57:25
take a00:57:27
annoyed that the general of the camp notes he00:57:30
says what's wrong and00:57:33
this spy pretends to be bored00:57:36
saying but listen everything is fine00:57:38
I see you have an army00:57:39
wonderful just there is a little00:57:41
problem is that I find that your00:57:43
ships pitch a lot on the00:57:46
rivers on the waves of the Yang and I do00:57:49
I had some advice I would be a little00:57:51
worried because I fear that because00:57:54
of this roll and this engages your sailors00:57:57
your warriors will not be sick during00:58:01
all night and to fight00:58:02
tomorrow that he is not in a state of00:58:04
to fight against the opposing army00:58:07
at that moment the general falls into the00:58:09
panel and said ah well yes that I don't00:58:11
hadn't thought about it but how could I00:58:13
do and the spy tells him oh I have00:58:16
an idea but hey you know do it00:58:17
what you want then I attract it00:58:19
the attention of the general in question00:58:23
who presses him saying what00:58:24
you have an idea00:58:26
and the spy said to him well here I am00:58:28
suggests to you an idea is that all00:58:31
ships of your fleet you put them00:58:33
all side by side and you tie them up00:58:35
one after the other by00:58:37
chains like they will all be tied up00:58:40
to each other with chains00:58:43
going to do something much more00:58:44
stable and so your your warriors will00:58:47
to be able to sleep well tonight00:58:50
will be fresh and ready to lead00:58:52
battle tomorrow the general and what00:58:55
extraordinary idea I will apply this00:58:57
right away and so he decides in effect00:58:59
to tie up all the ships one by one00:59:01
next to others with chains00:59:02
powerful to stabilize the whole and00:59:05
that therefore these sailors and these warriors00:59:07
can sleep well and the general says00:59:10
What can I do for you00:59:11
thank the fake peasant says no no00:59:14
nothing at all you know me it was00:59:15
just a common sense idea and then00:59:17
he leaves and returns to camp number00:59:21
1 number a from which it was from which it emanated00:59:24
and he tells the general that it is00:59:26
the ploy worked and what did it do?00:59:29
at that moment the general well he leaves00:59:31
with his army and he is going to attack the00:59:33
ships and like ships are all00:59:34
tied to each other they lost00:59:37
any strategic mobility and therefore they00:59:39
are we sending them comments00:59:41
would I say fire et cetera and they don't00:59:43
cannot defend themselves because they have00:59:45
lost all mobility and the army is00:59:47
completely destroyed here00:59:48
the illustration that there is in one of the00:59:51
editions of this waste stratagem then00:59:54
it is a stratagem that is used which00:59:56
is studied in all schools of00:59:58
war and well that’s the illustration01:00:00
finally it is its application that01:00:02
the Americans applied to the01:00:05
European construction the invention of01:00:06
European construction is01:00:08
stratagem of01:00:11
chains then there is another way to01:00:13
present things to go01:00:16
maybe to introduce yourself in a way01:00:17
more modern the owner of a01:00:20
detached house is sole master of01:00:23
him when he wants to resume his flights01:00:26
change your roof, repaint for example01:00:28
the entrance in lavender blue color it01:00:30
does it if he wants when he wants it's enough01:00:33
that he has the will that he has the money01:00:35
to pay for the painting if now01:00:38
instead of owning your house01:00:41
individual he is the owner of a01:00:43
apartment in a condominium of six01:00:46
apartments he does not then certainly he can01:00:49
at home change the color in his01:00:51
apartment but it can no longer change01:00:53
the shutters he can no longer change the01:00:56
roof he can no longer change the01:00:58
color of the stairwell because01:01:00
that he must obtain authorization01:01:02
of the other five01:01:04
co-owner so already things are going01:01:06
become much more complicated it will01:01:08
have to obtain authorization from the five01:01:10
others or the human being is in what he01:01:12
is and the French being what they are01:01:14
moreover it is very rare to01:01:16
get along wonderfully with01:01:17
his five neighbors especially when he01:01:20
is to choose a color by01:01:22
example and so everything will become a lot01:01:24
slower much more complicated and we01:01:26
will turn to the trustee who01:01:27
does not live in the building and who is01:01:30
the one who will resolve conflicts01:01:32
inside the building but if01:01:35
now instead of being in a01:01:36
co-ownership with six co-owners we01:01:39
is in a condominium with 2701:01:41
co-owner in a building at this01:01:43
at that point no one decides to01:01:45
nothing because it's so complicated01:01:47
Besides, people don't know each other01:01:49
not the person who lives on the 3rd floor01:01:51
example knows very well it's friends01:01:53
who are 500 m from parents who01:01:56
maybe even I don't know01:01:57
expatriates can have an expatriate brother01:01:59
in Japan or Australia so he has01:02:02
links with people located01:02:03
sometimes very far but on the other hand it01:02:05
may very well not know at all01:02:07
la la the owner of the 15th floor he01:02:10
there is no longer any link and therefore in this01:02:13
condition it is the external element which01:02:17
decides everything so we have to see how01:02:19
it works to understand you have01:02:21
understood that the metaphor that I present01:02:23
in front of you the individual house is01:02:26
an independent and sovereign country01:02:29
co-ownership with six apartments it is01:02:31
Europe of 6 and co-ownership with 2701:02:34
apartments is Europe01:02:36
27 note also the genius of the01:02:38
French language the genius of the language01:02:41
French in the 60s we said01:02:43
Europe D6 and now we say01:02:46
Europe A27 i.e.01:02:48
unconsciously in our unconscious01:02:50
collective when we said the Europe of601:02:52
it was a Europe that emanated from us01:02:54
des6 meant that we01:02:56
had the feeling of still being a little01:02:58
those who wanted this affair01:03:01
now when we say Europe at 2701:03:03
it's something that goes beyond01:03:06
will of anyone for good01:03:08
understand how it works because01:03:10
I think it's really important01:03:11
is at the heart of the explanation of01:03:14
ways why it doesn't work01:03:16
Europe and why it can't01:03:17
walk eh it was designed by the01:03:20
Americans so that it can't01:03:22
walk well just take this01:03:24
example of a large set of 2701:03:27
co-owners the more people there are01:03:29
the more conflicting interests01:03:31
multiply and the more it blocks all01:03:33
decision a building at 27 le01:03:35
owner of the ground floor wants that01:03:37
we change the front door which01:03:39
cools the hall because it01:03:42
directly concerns he lives in01:03:44
ground floor but that's a it's01:03:46
one these are works it will cost01:03:48
money gold floor owners01:03:51
upper are struts they do not have01:03:53
don't want to spend their money on01:03:54
change the inlet port which cools the01:03:56
ha when we live in the 6th we want to01:03:58
spend your money on anything else01:04:01
the owner of the 2nd floor01:04:02
complained about the smells of the garbage VI which01:04:04
goes back but which does not concern the01:04:07
residents of the 6th, 7th or 8th floor01:04:10
owner of 4th floor has problems01:04:12
of canonization which only concern01:04:14
him the owners of the floors01:04:16
superiors, they want to renovate01:04:17
the elevator obviously because they01:04:18
use it constantly but01:04:21
revenge for now is the01:04:22
owner of the ground floor of01:04:24
first floor who don't want to spend01:04:25
their money to renovate01:04:26
the elevator since he doesn't use it01:04:28
and then you have the owner of the01:04:30
top floor that wants to be renovated01:04:32
the whole terrace because it has01:04:33
water infiltration in his living room but01:04:35
that all the other co-owners do01:04:38
don't care, it's going to cost them very, very expensive01:04:39
they don't really care that the the01:04:41
owner of the top floor and01:04:43
water infiltration in his in his01:04:45
living room money to spend he prefers01:04:48
keep for them for example to go01:04:50
spend a week01:04:51
Antilles we therefore see in these01:04:53
conditions where no one agrees and01:04:56
well there is a need to put all the01:04:58
everyone agrees it's the union01:05:01
exterior to the building which must01:05:03
decide and who will decide everything then01:05:07
if you understood that well at the limit01:05:10
I could stop my lecture because01:05:11
that you have understood the trap of01:05:14
European construction designed by01:05:16
Americans because you understand01:05:18
all the geopolitics in which we01:05:20
are01:05:21
stuck, let's replace the building at 27 with01:05:25
a European Union to01:05:28
27 France as the owner of01:05:31
first floor France she wants one01:05:33
currency that is not too strong01:05:35
common currency not too strong because01:05:36
the competitiveness of the French economy01:05:38
is not the same as competitiveness01:05:40
of the German economy, for example01:05:42
France she wants a French Europe01:05:44
France wants a Europe that protects01:05:46
the social achievements France wants01:05:47
a social Europe she wants a Europe01:05:49
agricultural, France wants a Europe01:05:51
where French is spoken, France it01:05:53
wants a Europe that opposes01:05:55
American hegemony, France01:05:57
wants a Europe that cooperates with01:05:58
developing countries in the South01:06:00
this is what France wants and a lot01:06:02
of French people say to themselves, well, that’s it01:06:05
that Europe that I mean almost01:06:06
everyone besides you have all the01:06:07
political leaders who come01:06:09
tell you I want a social Europe01:06:12
I want a Europe that does01:06:14
counterweight to the United States, that's all01:06:16
what they are saying to you but01:06:18
it's not yours it's not yours01:06:20
who should say01:06:21
that's for others, for others pe but01:06:25
other peoples completely want01:06:27
differently the United Kingdom wants01:06:29
dismantle the common agricultural policy01:06:32
UK wants close alliance01:06:34
with the United States in all01:06:35
areas uk is going to be again01:06:37
closer to the United States than it is01:06:39
currently Germany on its behalf01:06:41
wants a strong currency because they have01:06:43
the haunting is also the reason01:06:45
why the euro will eventually explode01:06:47
they are obsessed with the reissue of the01:06:49
scenario of01:06:51
1923 they cannot they notice01:06:55
that they cannot have the same01:06:57
currency than Greece than Italy than01:06:58
Spain he is seeing it at the moment01:07:01
they want to leave the euro, these are the01:07:03
United States which prevents them since01:07:05
as I remind you just now01:07:06
are the United States which since 1965 have01:07:09
demanded that he have this currency01:07:11
European you have the Eastern countries01:07:14
Estonia la lonia Lithuania la01:07:16
Poland Czechia01:07:19
Hungary01:07:21
Slovakia Romania all these countries01:07:24
the east veent want protection01:07:26
American military they want it01:07:29
American military protection against01:07:30
the Russian threat because they are afraid01:07:33
Russians and we can understand them01:07:36
were for several decades under01:07:38
the guardianship of the Union01:07:40
Soviet they also want if01:07:43
besides if we were Polish01:07:45
let's think about the Pole the Poles during01:07:47
several times throughout their history01:07:48
their country was divided between Germany01:07:51
and Russia so they want to have01:07:54
protectors until 1940 he01:07:56
relied on the protection of01:07:58
United Kingdom and France then when01:08:00
Hitler invaded Poland and we01:08:03
at that moment we intervened01:08:04
as you know to defend the01:08:06
Poland but as you also know01:08:08
we have been crushed since then01:08:11
this time01:08:12
Polish found that the01:08:15
French and English could not01:08:16
no longer protect them so they want to01:08:18
American military umbrella by01:08:21
elsewhere they all refuse a01:08:22
social and fiscal harmonization with01:08:24
the rich countries of the West for better01:08:26
compete with them and then add that the01:08:29
Luxembourg refuses the fight against01:08:31
heaven01:08:32
tax since he's on that01:08:34
that he bases his wealth let us add that01:08:37
Malta Cyprus and Greece do not want01:08:39
too restrictive measures against01:08:40
maritime pollution since the the the01:08:43
big shipowners are who you know who01:08:45
have ships with flags of01:08:47
complacency of Liberia of Panama of du01:08:49
vanouatou well these are precisely01:08:52
Maltese Cypriot Greek shipowners01:08:56
so we have exactly the same01:08:58
situation at the level01:09:01
geopolitical than the situation that I01:09:04
showed pleasantly at the level of01:09:06
particular in the same building and01:09:08
the same way as for a building and01:09:10
well all that is settled by a trustee01:09:11
exterior and well we therefore need a01:09:14
union outside the Europe of 27 which01:09:16
will decide everything so what01:09:19
question falls under01:09:21
meaning who is the union outside the UR01:09:25
at 27 who has the power who is who what01:09:29
is the power that has so much01:09:31
power that it can impose on Europe01:09:33
who doesn't understand anything she can01:09:36
impose a policy because there01:09:37
will have a majority of States which01:09:39
will put away his01:09:41
opinion ask the question that's it01:09:49
answer and there is someone who had01:09:51
already answered on May 15, 1962 it was01:09:55
the head of the President of the Republic01:09:56
French it was Charles de Gaulle so01:10:00
de Gaulle tells us this in his01:10:01
press conference of May 15, 6201:10:05
tells us let's found the six states together01:10:08
in a supranational entity notice01:10:10
although at the time it was still01:10:12
of the Europe of 6 eh absolutely01:10:15
I would like to know that it will be very simple and01:10:18
very practical these are ideas which01:10:20
can perhaps charm a few01:10:23
spirits but I don't see at all01:10:26
how we could make them01:10:28
practically even if we had01:10:30
six signatures at the bottom of a paper it is01:10:33
true that in this integrated Europe01:10:35
as they say there might not be01:10:37
policy at all this would simplify01:10:40
a lot of things indeed from then on01:10:42
that there would be no France01:10:44
of Europe that there would not be a01:10:45
policy because we cannot impose it01:10:47
one to each of the six states01:10:50
would refrain from doing so01:10:51
would refrain from making a policy01:10:53
European but then perhaps this world01:10:56
would he follow someone01:10:58
from outside who would have one01:11:02
politically there would perhaps be a01:11:04
unifying but it would not be01:11:07
European and it would not be Europe01:11:10
integrated it would be something completely different01:11:12
much wider and much more01:11:14
extended with I repeat a unifier01:11:17
perhaps this is what in someone01:11:19
measure and sometimes inspires some01:11:22
words of this or that supporter of integration01:11:25
of Europe then it would be better01:11:28
say Charles de Gaulle May 1501:11:32
1962 when he talks about unifying01:11:35
outside which would not be European01:11:37
well he says what I just told you01:11:38
explain when I speak of a union and01:11:40
when he says that he would not be European01:11:42
everyone understands that it is the01:11:44
United States of America who are targeting him01:11:47
can measure genius even if it is necessary01:11:49
recognize political genius and01:11:51
strategic of de gaaule since the 15th01:11:53
May 1962 is the Europe of 6 years ago01:11:56
still practically nothing that has been01:11:57
fact except that de Gaul he knows the01:11:59
Anglo-Saxons of Gaul he never forgot01:12:02
the second world war with the01:12:04
conferences of posdam of Tan of Yalta where01:12:08
each time he the representative of the01:12:10
Free France was put aside and where01:12:12
Roosevelt and Churchill01:12:14
met with Stalin to share01:12:16
Europe and he knows very well that01:12:19
Europe was divided in two and it01:12:21
very well understood that the construction01:12:23
European moreover at the time in01:12:24
the 50s and 60s are still01:12:26
common knowledge it is a design01:12:30
American to get their hands on01:12:32
Western Europe in a more01:12:33
subtle as Stalin had done in01:12:35
imposing popular democracies by01:12:38
coups d'état as you know01:12:39
in all Eastern countries but that01:12:41
comes to the same thing it comes down to making01:12:44
United States colonies have it perfectly01:12:47
understood then there is a small problem01:12:50
you have to know he has it perfectly01:12:51
understood I endow I I underline at01:12:53
passage that this conference dates from 1501:12:56
May 62, that is to say a month after the01:12:58
month of April 62 and in April 1962 well this01:13:02
are the chords of viant i.e.01:13:04
that de Gaul came to power in01:13:06
1958 in May 58 it was not him who01:13:10
signed the Treaty of Rome in 1954 ago01:13:13
an alliance with the communists to01:13:15
to fail the CED the Community01:13:17
European Defense Treaty of Rome01:13:19
was signed on March 2501:13:21
1957 by the Félix Gaillard government01:13:25
of the 4th Republic when de Gaul01:13:27
comes to power in May 58 he arrives01:13:29
in a context of near war01:13:32
civil with what is happening in Algeria01:13:34
we are talking about the events in Algeria, it is01:13:36
in fact a colonial war is in01:13:38
waged a war of independence and01:13:39
liberation with which doubles as a01:13:41
civil war between French so he he01:13:44
not going to take care of Europe, that's what he's coming from01:13:45
to arrive besides there is still nothing that01:13:47
was made from 58 to April 62 it regulates the01:13:51
Algerian question more or less well01:13:53
that's another matter01:13:55
it ends in April 62 and immediately a01:13:58
months later he takes charge01:14:01
European question because he01:14:03
understood that this is the question that will01:14:05
become decisive and therefore he underlines it01:14:09
and there is something that is01:14:10
absolutely fundamental to understand01:14:13
now it's that same evening he01:14:16
made this statement it must be 4 p.m.01:14:19
4:30 p.m. at01:14:21
8 p.m. MRP government ministers01:14:24
the four MRP ministers of the government01:14:27
slams the door of the French government01:14:29
and de Gaul at 8 p.m. finds himself without01:14:32
majority because there is something01:14:34
that we always forget is that01:14:36
Gaulle was not a dictator01:14:38
Gaulle was a head of state who had01:14:41
need a majority in the Assembly01:14:42
national or the Gaulist deputies01:14:44
represented a third of the deputies01:14:46
like the left-wing deputies and the01:14:49
communists in particular refused to01:14:51
supporting de Gaulle which is a crime to01:14:53
the time scale because the01:14:55
communists should have supported de Gaul01:14:57
for questions of freedom01:14:58
of national independence he does not01:15:00
did not do so de Gaul could not01:15:03
having a majority was obliged to have01:15:05
recourse to the MRP which was a bit01:15:08
the equivalent of the centrists the MRP01:15:10
it was Robert's party01:15:13
Schuman therefore de Gaul found himself01:15:16
faced with this situation01:15:18
Shakespearean to have understood that the01:15:21
European construction was a01:15:23
vassalization company01:15:25
colonization of France and surrendered01:15:28
realized that he did not have the means01:15:29
policies of01:15:32
going out is what explains the01:15:35
policy difficult to understand otherwise01:15:38
of de Gaul vis-à-vis Europe which01:15:40
from time to time says one thing and from time to time01:15:42
in time says its opposite and you have01:15:45
currently political crooks01:15:48
which make the French believe that de Gaul01:15:50
would have been for Europe it is wrong to01:15:52
Gaul was not at all for Europe01:15:53
he simply had everything01:15:55
but he didn't have the means01:15:56
policies of01:15:58
get out from elsewhere he had been again01:16:01
clearer with Alain perfidious who was01:16:04
the minister of01:16:06
Information and that he encountered01:16:09
several times a week in mind01:16:10
head to head and perfid left us in a01:16:13
book in more in three taes which01:16:15
is called CTA de Gaulle which appeared in01:16:17
97 left us what these words01:16:20
that he had captured on the spot from his01:16:23
interviews with the general of and that's it01:16:26
what deg said to him01:16:28
1963 some time after this01:16:30
press conference you know what01:16:32
that means the01:16:35
supranationality the domination of01:16:37
Americans, supranational Europe is01:16:41
Europe under American command01:16:44
Germans, Italians, Belgians01:16:46
Netherlands is dominated by Americans01:16:49
the English too but from another01:16:51
way because they are the same01:16:53
family then it is only France which01:16:56
do not be dominated for the sake of dominating her01:16:59
also we persist in wanting to do it01:17:01
enter into a supranational thing01:17:04
orders from Washington de Gaul does not want01:17:07
of that then we are not happy and we01:17:09
says it all day long we put the01:17:12
France in quarantine but we don't want anymore01:17:14
do it and the more France becomes a01:17:17
center01:17:18
of attraction he had understood everything and01:17:21
this analysis which is done in 63 we can01:17:23
do 49 years after pr without changing one01:17:26
only word if we can simply change01:17:28
the fact that instead of being with five01:17:29
partners we are with now there is01:17:32
26 others01:17:35
partners in good military and01:17:38
perfect GA strategist had known01:17:41
decipher the stratagem very early on01:17:44
chains designed in Washington he had01:17:47
understood that this so-called construction01:17:49
European Union would allow the United States to01:17:51
tie up France and vassalize the01:17:54
European continent in him in him01:17:57
imposing an absurd system01:17:59
self-locking and although GA is01:18:02
defined this in 1963 who explained it in01:18:06
public from01:18:08
1962 in this press conference and01:18:11
well currently everything has been done to01:18:14
that the French don't understand it01:18:16
eh, nowadays we broadcast analyzes01:18:19
who explain the opposite even to01:18:21
French than European construction01:18:23
would be a French ambition like the01:18:26
wrote Mr. Alain Duamel in a01:18:28
paruch book at lead or even01:18:30
as the Socialist Party did01:18:32
European construction would have for01:18:34
aim of counterbalancing the United States01:18:35
This is the poster that had been01:18:38
broadcast in 1992 20 years ago by the01:18:41
Socialist Party to call the01:18:43
French people to vote yes to the treaty of01:18:45
Maastrich, making Europe means making01:18:47
weight we see a planet with a01:18:51
caricature with a smotori wrestler01:18:53
japanese finally a japanese smot one01:18:55
Japanese SMO wrestler and then one01:18:57
American wrestling player with a cross01:18:59
crossed out in red to show that thanks to01:19:01
Europe and we would be able to01:19:04
send the Japanese threat away01:19:07
since at the time the wrong yellow01:19:09
it was Japanese now for the01:19:11
Europeanists the bad yellow is the01:19:13
yellow peril is the Chinese peril because01:19:15
that basically I will come back to it elsewhere01:19:17
just now the construction01:19:18
European is based on reflexes01:19:20
racist as we see in this01:19:22
poster of the Socialist Party elsewhere01:19:24
but also you see this kind of01:19:26
myth it's a lie that the01:19:28
European construction is going to us01:19:30
allow us to take stock of the01:19:33
United States besides this poster at 2001:19:35
years 20 years later eh it's like in01:19:38
the three musketeers 20 years later01:19:42
do you see how the01:19:44
having been tied up by the treaty of01:19:46
Maastrich the European currency01:19:49
common foreign security policy01:19:50
of the Treaty of Maastrich how01:19:52
gradually we are in the process of01:19:54
Becoming the stooges of NATO and the01:19:58
United States so it's the exact opposite01:20:01
who is01:20:03
true then we come to a third01:20:06
stupid question since de Gaulle had01:20:10
understood the American stratagem why01:20:13
Did he not bring France out of the01:20:15
European construction and why01:20:16
did he sometimes even give the impression01:20:18
to support her and for a reason01:20:21
that I have already explained to you it does not01:20:23
did not have the political means he had01:20:25
needed the support of the MRP which was the01:20:27
part of Robert Schuman and he therefore had01:20:30
he could not leave the Union01:20:32
European and could not01:20:34
denounce so he will develop a01:20:38
counter-strategy that I call01:20:40
Gaulish counter-strategy and its failures01:20:44
in01:20:45
1957 when the Treaty of Rome was signed01:20:48
the Europe of 6 was that plus the Empire01:20:50
colonial French and then in 19601:20:55
after de Gaul gave their01:20:56
independence to all African countries01:20:58
the Europe of 6 is France here01:21:01
but even there France remains01:21:04
another country that is more powerful than01:21:07
the other countries of the Europe of 601:21:10
Germany is cut in two it is leaving01:21:13
of the Second World War it is a01:21:14
international plague and Italy01:21:17
is also plagued by01:21:20
Moussolinian regime and in addition it is a01:21:22
country whose entire south is extremely01:21:24
poor therefore de Gaulle understood that the01:21:28
European construction is a maneuver01:21:31
of vassalization but he also understood01:21:32
that he can't get out of it so he's going01:21:35
have a strategist's thinking, he will01:21:38
like any good strategist, examine what01:21:40
are its strong points what are its01:21:42
strengths or what are the strengths of the01:21:44
France the surface area in the Europe of 601:21:47
France is the largest country in very01:21:50
far twice as big at the time01:21:53
that the Federal Republic01:21:55
from West Germany since it is01:21:56
only West Germany01:21:58
geographical position France is at01:22:00
center at the geographical baricenter of01:22:03
the Europe of 6 its agriculture is the01:22:06
most powerful agriculture in Europe01:22:08
of the 6 his intellectual prestige in 196001:22:12
62 is the time of Camu who dies in01:22:15
a car accident is the time of01:22:17
Jean-Paul sa de Simone de Beauvoir is01:22:19
Saint-Germain des pré there will be01:22:21
a few years later it will be the01:22:23
French cinema Jeanl Luc Godard01:22:25
Catherine denuve Alain Delon all that01:22:27
goes around the world, France is01:22:29
also the country among the Europe of 601:22:31
the only one whose language is spoken on01:22:33
not all continents speak it01:22:35
Dutch on all continents01:22:37
German neither01:22:38
Italian France is located in addition01:22:41
in the camp of the winners of the01:22:42
Second World War France is the01:22:44
the only one in the Europe of 6 which has a01:22:47
permanent seat on the Security Council01:22:48
of the United Nations01:22:50
which gives him a veto right which01:22:51
made it reach the status of 5 great01:22:55
world power United States Union01:22:57
Soviet China England and01:23:00
France and finally France in arms01:23:04
nuclear first A bomb explodes at01:23:06
Rean in the Sahara desert and01:23:08
Gaulle throughout the 60s will01:23:10
to have the obsession to achieve01:23:13
in 1966 in the fangatofa sheet of01:23:16
detonate the first H bomb01:23:17
first thermonuclear bomb which01:23:19
brings France to the rank of super01:23:21
large nuclear power which cannot01:23:24
have none of the other states of Europe01:23:26
of the 6 therefore at the start of his presidency in01:23:29
62 63 when de Gaul understood that the01:23:33
European construction is a maneuver01:23:35
of American vassalization and that he01:23:37
understood that he cannot get out of it01:23:39
is said but my faith if I examine all these01:23:42
assets there is perhaps a move to01:23:45
to play the game is to observe01:23:47
that France is by far the most01:23:49
great power of the UR in addition to the01:23:52
the icing on the cake is that she is01:23:53
led by GA itself which is a01:23:55
kind of living myth one of the very01:23:58
great leaders of the Second War01:24:00
world which will soon be01:24:01
The only Roosevelt as you know01:24:03
died in 45 Stalin in 1953 and01:24:06
Churchill will die in01:24:09
1964 therefore de Gaul will be the last01:24:12
prestigious chef winner of the Second01:24:15
World War so at that time it01:24:18
will ESS try to01:24:21
subvert American strategy by01:24:24
trying to transform the construction01:24:26
European into a mechanism serving the01:24:28
French interests all the genius of its01:24:31
thought is there he dreamed of transforming01:24:34
Europe which was an American Europe01:24:37
into an independent Europe sinking01:24:39
like a wedge between the two blocks01:24:41
it was him who said it he wanted a01:24:43
European Europe which would have been01:24:46
obviously under French influence01:24:48
taking into account all our advantages01:24:50
comparisons that's what he wanted01:24:52
couldn't say he couldn't say01:24:54
I want a French Europe but it01:24:56
knew there was a Europe01:24:57
Soviet which was the Eastern countries01:24:59
he knew that the Americans wanted01:25:01
an American Europe and he01:25:02
proposed to contain Europe01:25:04
American in the United Kingdom and that between01:25:07
both there would be a Europe which01:25:08
would be a French Europe of Gaul01:25:10
dreamed of reconstituting Greater Europe01:25:12
Century of Louis XIV at the time when all01:25:15
the courts of Europe spoke French01:25:17
Besides, we made a lot of jokes about01:25:19
Gaulle at the time to compare himself to01:25:20
Louis XIV you know that with Malrou he01:25:23
donated a lot of money to01:25:25
bring the Palace of Versailles back to life01:25:27
since de Gaul's obsession was01:25:29
to give the French pride in their01:25:31
own01:25:33
country so he tried to subvert this01:25:38
European construction to make it01:25:41
a French Europe but so that this01:25:44
Gaulish counter-strategy has chances01:25:46
of Ré it was a bit like in aikido01:25:48
do you know yourself in martial arts01:25:49
use the opponent's strength against01:25:51
him the Americans wanted to force us01:25:53
to say an American colony by a01:25:55
European construction proposed to him01:25:56
to transform this construction01:25:57
European into a machine which would serve01:25:59
to eject the United States and place01:26:02
the whole under the power01:26:04
French but he understood that there01:26:06
had two absolutely decisive things01:26:08
to make it work first prevent01:26:11
at all costs the British to enter01:26:13
in this European construction otherwise01:26:15
that would be the end of his dream of a01:26:17
Europe independent of the United States under01:26:19
French influence he knew it01:26:21
had seen it he said it to the fullest Churchill01:26:23
incredible licks01:26:25
Roosevelt understood that01:26:27
United Kingdom has become the horse of01:26:28
troit of the United States that's why he01:26:30
fought tooth and nail so that01:26:32
the United Kingdom will never be able to enter01:26:34
in the common market it was the01:26:37
first first imperative for that01:26:40
works and the second imperative then that01:26:43
it was enough to decide he had put01:26:45
his calf entering the United Kingdom01:26:47
so as long as he was at the Élysée it wouldn't01:26:49
could not this first condition01:26:52
worked the second condition01:26:54
unfortunately did not depend only on01:26:56
him the second condition is that he01:26:59
wanted to achieve that the01:27:00
geopoliticians call decoupling01:27:02
strategic relationship between Germany and01:27:04
United States of America that is rather01:27:07
that Germany is allied with the United States01:27:10
that Germany agrees to become the01:27:13
number 2 in Europe behind the power01:27:15
French as had been the case in01:27:17
17th and 18th century but at the time01:27:19
it was pre-Bismarquean Germany there01:27:21
had01:27:22
Germanys so there it was both01:27:25
strategic thoughts of GA and the01:27:27
point number 2 well he tried to01:27:30
put in place with the treaty of01:27:32
the Élysée of January 22, 63 where we see him01:27:36
sign a treaty here de Gaulle with the01:27:38
chancellor adenaer here it's a a a01:27:42
a photo of the official document it is a01:27:44
very short document which only01:27:45
four pages and what's in it01:27:48
famous treaty of the Élysée which is01:27:50
the origin of this Franco-German engine01:27:53
which we are still talking about now 5001:27:56
years later we are still told the engine01:27:57
Franco-German couple01:27:58
Franco-German what is Degon01:28:00
had wanted to do he had wanted to do01:28:02
a Europe under French influence and01:28:06
which would emerge from the United States01:28:07
of America therefore in this treaty the treaty01:28:10
from the Élysée on January 22, 63 if you01:28:13
take you will find the text on01:28:15
internet there is at no time01:28:18
question of the United States of America01:28:20
the word never appears there or01:28:23
Great Britain nor the so-called01:28:25
necessity that we would have to have a01:28:27
common defense between Europe and01:28:29
United States neither of Gat nor of NATO nor of01:28:33
the alleged need to lower01:28:35
customs barriers between Europe and01:28:37
Great Britain and the United States01:28:38
wanted to create a European Europe under01:28:40
influence01:28:41
French, that’s what he signed with01:28:46
Aden only01:28:48
here there were in Germany and in01:28:52
France of the people who formed the01:28:56
United States and all this was followed by01:28:59
close to01:29:01
Washington so close that the01:29:03
President Kennedy 3 days before the01:29:06
signature summoned to the White House01:29:08
mr knapstein ambassador01:29:10
from Germany to express the fury01:29:13
of the01:29:14
Americans President Kennedy was01:29:17
visibly in a bad mood it's the01:29:18
dispatch from Mr. Knapstein01:29:20
ambassador of the Federal Republic01:29:21
from Germany to the United States addressed to01:29:22
German Foreign Minister01:29:24
at the time Gerard schreuder was not the01:29:25
same as the one we experienced recently01:29:27
who was chancellor it was another01:29:29
it's a homonym on January 19, 63 you01:29:33
know besides that Kennedy will be01:29:34
assassinated on November 22 of the same01:29:36
year but here it is January 19, 6301:29:38
President Kennedy was visibly01:29:40
bad mood he gave himself in front01:29:42
me in front of me clearly and01:29:44
insistent on a criticism of the01:29:46
internal situation of the Alliance01:29:48
Atlantic and he underlined the concern that01:29:51
gave him the conclusion of the treaty01:29:53
Franco-German ésée who was therefore going01:29:54
be signed 3 days01:29:56
afterwards because the Americans had01:29:58
understood that de Gaulle was in the process of01:30:01
subvert their strategy he was in01:30:03
wanting to do a construction01:30:05
European who would not be up to the task01:30:07
Americans because precisely there01:30:09
would not have England precisely he01:30:11
would not have NATO nor the GAT and precisely01:30:14
there would be an alliance01:30:15
Franco-German to make01:30:17
otherwise fury of the Americans and the01:30:22
German double game01:30:24
because what does Mr. Knapstein answer?01:30:26
to Kennedy during the interview I01:30:28
searched repeatedly whatever with a01:30:31
very relative success in changing opinion01:30:34
of the American President on this treaty01:30:36
I underlined the positive meaning01:30:38
that he wore for the political life of01:30:39
Europe and for the future of the Alliance01:30:42
Atlantic I pointed out to him that01:30:43
this close collaboration01:30:44
Franco-German could ultimately01:30:48
benefit the entire alliance01:30:50
precisely as regards these01:30:52
aspects of de Gaulle's policy which01:30:54
irritated the01:30:56
president meditate on this text a little01:31:00
very diplomatic convoluted we see01:31:03
what in fact the ambassador said01:31:04
from Germany to Kennedy it's don't worry01:31:08
don't do that, it's not de Gaulle who01:31:11
is winning we are in01:31:13
train us to trick him to actually01:31:17
take him where he doesn't want and that's01:31:20
what happened because you know01:31:23
that a treaty when it is signed it must01:31:25
then be ratified and therefore the moment01:31:29
came from ratification on June 1501:31:31
1963 by the Bundestag 6 months after the01:31:35
German MPs when ratifying01:31:38
the Franco-German treaty of the Élysée01:31:41
first voted for what we call01:31:44
in the story the preamble01:31:45
interpretive here manifesting the01:31:48
willingness to direct the application of this01:31:50
processed towards the main goals that the01:31:51
Federal Republic of Germany continues01:31:54
for years in union with its01:31:55
other allies who determine its01:31:57
policy, namely the maintenance and01:32:00
strengthening the alliance of peoples01:32:02
free in particular a narrow01:32:04
association between Europe and01:32:05
UNITED STATES01:32:06
of America the common defense in the01:32:09
framework of the north Atlantic alliance01:32:11
of NATO and the integration of forces01:32:14
armies of the member states of the pact01:32:15
the unification of Europe along the path01:32:17
traced by the creation of Communities01:32:18
European by admitting the01:32:21
Great Britain the lowering of01:32:23
customs barriers through negotiations01:32:25
between the Economic Community01:32:26
European Union, Great Britain and01:32:27
United States of America as well as others01:32:30
States within the framework of Gat and therefore01:32:32
aware that cooperation01:32:34
Franco-German led according to its goals01:32:37
all this will be beneficial for everyone01:32:39
people then the Bundestag ratifies the01:32:41
following law i.e. the treaty then01:32:43
in international law you need to know01:32:46
that this interpretative preamble does01:32:48
integral part of the treaty version01:32:50
German but as you can see01:32:53
the Bundestag therefore added to the treaty01:32:57
everything that de Gaulle had01:32:59
wanted to avoid the interpretative preamble01:33:03
thus emphasizing all the elements01:33:04
that de Gaul had precisely excluded from01:33:06
treated the subordination of the01:33:08
European construction and integration01:33:09
Atlantic military cooperation with01:33:11
the United States Great Britain in01:33:13
voting on this document the Bundestag vida01:33:16
therefore of substance 6 months after its01:33:18
signing the philosophy of the treaty of01:33:20
the Élysée itself behaved like a01:33:23
vassal of washington and ruin to all01:33:25
possibility of building a Europe01:33:28
European strategic objective that01:33:30
continued de Gaulle with the treaty01:33:31
Franco-German of the Élysée was therefore01:33:33
wiped out 6 months after signing it01:33:36
extremely important to understand is01:33:39
that since 1963 we have lived on a myth in01:33:42
France the myth of the couple01:33:44
Franco-German, that’s what the01:33:45
general public but it's a it's like01:33:48
if it's as if I were saying that by01:33:51
example I am married to Monica01:33:54
if you want but no I'm not01:33:56
married to Monica Bellucci Monica01:33:58
Bellucci knows she's not married01:34:00
with me so we say to the French that01:34:02
we are the couple01:34:04
Franco-German but the Germans do not01:34:06
do not recognize01:34:08
so for the Germans had what is01:34:11
important it's something else entirely01:34:13
we'll see it right away01:34:14
of GA drew the consequence he said to01:34:16
perfidious the Germans had been my01:34:19
great hope they are my great01:34:21
disappointment01:34:25
so what happened well he01:34:27
happened that the Germans01:34:29
always preferred the United States to01:34:32
France and here I am talking to you about events01:34:34
from 1963 you will say it's old but01:34:36
no in in 2004 8 years ago on01:34:41
chancellor schreuder visited01:34:45
in the United States it was received by the01:34:47
American president on February 27, 200401:34:49
and they both signed a01:34:51
document that we don't talk about either01:34:53
in French01:34:54
never who01:34:57
deuts-aman01:35:01
2 which means the alliance01:35:03
German-American for the 21st century01:35:05
a strategic alliance for01:35:08
Germany strategic alliance01:35:10
number 1 which comes before all others01:35:12
thing it's not at all Europe it's01:35:14
the alliance01:35:15
German-American and in this text he01:35:18
is written what we strengthen our01:35:19
attachment away from NATO as01:35:21
anchor point of our common defense01:35:23
and as an essential forum for01:35:25
transatlantic consultations we01:35:27
support the ongoing process01:35:28
of European integration and underline01:35:31
that it is important that Europe and01:35:32
America working together like01:35:34
partner within a community of01:35:36
value we welcome the enlargement01:35:38
historical as well as of01:35:40
the European Union in reality01:35:43
Germany is the agent of influence01:35:45
number 1 in the United States in Europe in01:35:48
the framework of what is prefigured of which01:35:50
I already spoke earlier and on01:35:52
which I will return who is this great01:35:53
walk01:35:54
transatlantic which will be the new01:35:57
stage of the rocket which is intended to01:35:59
put the whole of Europe under the01:36:01
direct guardianship of the United States01:36:04
of America it is the 1854 strategy of01:36:07
the agent01:36:10
holes and that was signed on February 2701:36:14
2015 but barely January 13, 200601:36:16
became German Chancellor Madame01:36:18
Merkel was whistled at the report to the01:36:22
White House and she is she is01:36:24
went to recognize with President Bush01:36:27
that the German-American alliance for01:36:29
the 21st century of deut01:36:33
am well was also supported01:36:37
by the CDU csou and not only by the01:36:40
social democracy so it's the whole01:36:42
of the German political scene which01:36:44
supports01:36:46
this in other words Germany does not01:36:49
does not want a Europe independent of01:36:51
United States is the great failure01:36:53
fundamental of De Gaulle it is not01:36:56
having reached this decoupling he had01:37:01
deluded the Netherlands do not want01:37:03
of a Europe independent of the United States01:37:06
Spain does not want a Europe01:37:08
independent of the United States Portugal01:37:10
does not want an independent Europe01:37:11
of the United States there is also the01:37:12
large military base of assors01:37:15
United Kingdom wants an even more Europe01:37:17
close to01:37:18
United States Poland Estonia01:37:21
Latvia Lithuania Bulgaria01:37:23
Hungary Romania Slovakia01:37:25
Czechia entered the Union01:37:26
European after entering the top01:37:28
temp and they ask for the umbrella01:37:30
American strategic and military finally01:37:32
in short who agrees with01:37:34
there01:37:37
France as de Gaul said01:37:40
difficulty is that the colonized do not01:37:42
not really seeking to emancipate themselves from01:37:45
Americans European construction and01:37:48
NATO are two phases of the same01:37:50
medal the civil side and the side01:37:52
military01:37:54
which is the medal of enslavement01:37:56
and colonization by the great01:37:58
American power01:38:00
point then we come to the 4th01:38:03
stupid question since his attempt to01:38:07
build a Europe independent of01:38:10
Americans with the Germans placed01:38:13
under French influence was sabotaged01:38:15
by the 5 other members of the Europe of01:38:17
6 because since de Gaul surrendered01:38:20
realizes that as he said01:38:21
Germans were his great hope and01:38:23
that they were his great disappointment01:38:25
since de Gaul realized that he01:38:27
had been fooled that his that his01:38:29
ploy didn't work01:38:32
not he managed to block the entrance to the01:38:35
United Kingdom but it did not prevent that01:38:37
Germany still plays the game of01:38:40
Americans what did he decide to01:38:42
do knowing he couldn't01:38:43
get out of Europe since there was01:38:45
MRP what he decided to do is01:38:48
this extraordinary period of years01:38:50
63 64 65 66 67 the apogee of Gaulism and the01:38:58
world triumph of France01:39:00
Alas01:39:02
temporary so here is a01:39:05
capital exchanges to fully understand01:39:09
the situation that arose at this01:39:11
that moment of which we are the heirs01:39:14
perfit said to de Gaulle face to face01:39:18
it is always reported by perfit01:39:20
can we change01:39:22
shoulder gun then he sees that the01:39:24
Germans have just done them a blow01:39:26
de Jarnac with the affair of the preamble01:39:27
interpretative and de Gaulle responds but01:39:31
of course do you think we have01:39:34
need for the common market to breathe01:39:38
face of the maneuver of the English01:39:40
Americans and Germans and01:39:44
Germans our maneuver will be01:39:46
to say the end of the common market does not01:39:49
don't upset us I hadn't been01:39:53
favorable to European integration I01:39:55
Call back later in the01:39:57
50s he had failed in 195401:39:59
the CED in an alliance of01:40:01
circumstances with the communist parties01:40:03
French but once we had signed01:40:06
the Treaty of Rome March 2501:40:08
1957 I thought when I arrived in the01:40:12
business in May 58 that we had to01:40:14
applies it well yes besides in the01:40:16
institutions of the Republic article01:40:18
5 of our Constitution fixes as as01:40:21
as power to the President of the01:40:22
French Republic01:40:24
the president of the French Republic01:40:25
is the guarantor of independence01:40:27
national territorial integrity01:40:30
and respect for treaties so it01:40:34
considered that he had to respect the01:40:36
treaty that he discovered but he continues01:40:39
saying if it is not applied the01:40:41
France will do very well01:40:45
otherwise perfit is still a little01:40:49
surprised by this certainty of the head of01:40:52
the France of the founder of the 5th01:40:54
Republic and he returns to the charge and01:40:56
told him but still there is a01:40:58
widespread belief in minds01:41:00
especially in youth it is that without01:41:02
Europe, France will no longer be anything 1901:41:08
663 perfidious said that to de Gaulle and01:41:11
Gaulle replies it is possible that the01:41:15
end of the common market is precisely01:41:18
the end of this myth would be happy01:41:22
was forged by the smokers who01:41:25
wanted to make people believe in Europe01:41:28
supranational we wanted to do01:41:30
a policy of understanding with01:41:32
Germans, it’s the Élysée Treaty01:41:34
which I have just spoken to you about if the01:41:36
Germans slip through our fingers01:41:38
this is the interpretative preamble that I01:41:40
just deciphered with you and well01:41:42
we have the means to turn around01:41:45
the world is big and France has a01:41:48
great game to play what a beautiful sentence01:41:52
world is vast and France has a large01:41:56
game to play and what was thinking about01:41:59
that moment of Gaulle de Gaulle who01:42:01
knew his French history well01:42:03
slipped into the clothes of the grown-ups01:42:07
Capecians who made our country and01:42:09
especially he remembered01:42:12
the François episode01:42:15
I when France had already failed01:42:18
disappear we are in01:42:21
1519 in 1519 there is charlequin he is01:42:26
born in 1500 he is 19 years old he is the heir01:42:29
from the Habsburg family therefore01:42:30
all his possessions he owns01:42:32
Netherlands he owns we don't see here01:42:35
good but part of Austria01:42:38
in Austria he owns part of the01:42:39
Burgundy it also has the01:42:41
kingdom of the Two Sicilies it has the01:42:43
Iberian Peninsula finally from Spain and01:42:45
without counting the new discoveries01:42:48
Mexico and then more later01:42:51
in Peru by pizzar and Mexico conquered01:42:53
by Corthès and now01:42:55
1519 and well charlequin is made in addition01:42:58
of that to elect emperor of the Holy Roman Empire01:43:00
Germanic Roman so he has authority01:43:04
in terms of overlordship over all countries01:43:06
territories in01:43:08
Maron so you see that France is01:43:10
almost completely surrounded in01:43:14
1519 and on top of that while Francis01:43:18
1st tried to make an alliance with the01:43:20
King Henry VII of England with01:43:22
the interview of the du dras d'or camp and01:43:24
well Henry 8 ends up choosing sides01:43:28
of01:43:31
charlequin therefore France is01:43:33
completely01:43:35
surrounded, France risks01:43:37
disappear from being suffocated by01:43:40
strategy of encirclement01:43:42
charlequin and his empire while going01:43:45
do at that time François 1st and01:43:48
well he will make alliances first01:43:51
with German Protestant princes01:43:53
since fortunately he comes01:43:55
to have a schism that has just broken out01:43:57
Luther in Germany publishes the 85 theses01:44:00
you know about his church in wiltenberg01:44:02
and so he launched the Lutheran Reformation01:44:07
and Princes notably in01:44:09
the current equivalent of the Republic01:44:11
Czech Princes are going to kiss01:44:13
new the new heresy and so will01:44:15
place Charles Quin in a difficulty01:44:18
new compared to its own01:44:20
own territories and François prer who01:44:23
yet is the champion of01:44:26
catholicity François 1st who is the very01:44:28
Christian and well made alliance with the01:44:29
German Protestant princes and like01:44:31
that's not enough and he'll look for it01:44:34
another alliance and when we are01:44:36
threatened to be suffocated and to be01:44:38
disappear one way or another01:44:40
encircling maneuver and well you01:44:42
make an alliance with the devil if he01:44:45
What is the devil in 1525?01:44:49
1526 the devil is the Ottoman emperor01:44:53
he is the Grand Turk he is the leader of01:44:55
Islam is the one that threatens Europe01:44:58
complete submersion by the faith of01:45:03
Mahomet and indeed François 1st decide to01:45:06
make alliance with solidly the01:45:08
wonderful for loosening precisely and01:45:11
he achieves this encirclement of01:45:14
the empire of charlequin which goes elsewhere01:45:17
after that charlequin will retire into a01:45:19
monastery as you know then01:45:20
Protestantism will develop01:45:23
will give France the scales of01:45:24
lift the protection of the Christians of01:45:26
Levant and therefore it is these alliances of01:45:27
setbacks that will save the independence of01:45:30
France to the great scandal of01:45:33
Christianity the Christian trait was the01:45:35
official title of the King of France01:45:37
christianissimus the christian trait makes01:45:39
alliance with Protestant princes01:45:40
Germans and with the Grand Turk and well01:45:43
that's what Charles de Gaul was thinking in01:45:48
1963 when he saw that the Germans01:45:51
he filters between them and they are going to do01:45:54
alliance with the United States because01:45:57
de Gaul in 1963 it turns out I resume01:46:00
the same card as for charlequin it is01:46:02
found in this situation he01:46:05
found himself completely surrounded by01:46:08
forces that are01:46:11
Anglo-American and under influence01:46:13
American and so well he will do01:46:16
like Francis 1st he will make an alliance01:46:19
with the devil if necessary and the devil01:46:22
in 1963 64 65 who the devil is01:46:27
firstly the Latin American countries which01:46:30
are an anti yanki the supreme devil to01:46:35
the time is01:46:37
maotsetung is People's China and01:46:40
then the other great devil of the time01:46:42
it is the Soviet Union and therefore01:46:45
Gaulle will make an alliance or will establish01:46:47
links with all these countries with great fury01:46:50
to the great fury not of the01:46:52
Christianity but of what I would call01:46:54
Gaul's Americanness will recognize01:46:57
diplomatically China deutsetung will01:47:00
invent the policy of detente with01:47:02
the USSR to the great scandal of the United States01:47:06
of America and so we are going to have01:47:08
this incredible sequence of events01:47:11
which will follow one another throughout the years01:47:13
64 65 66 67 in January 64 from gaaule01:47:18
stuns the planet by recognizing the01:47:20
Mao's Communist China was not01:47:22
that he had become a communist nor a Maoist01:47:24
no more than Francis I was01:47:26
became a Muslim simply because01:47:28
that he understood that he needed01:47:30
reverse alliances and we see here01:47:32
one of the front pages of Canard Enchaîné finally the01:47:34
page 8 of Canard Enchaîné saying01:47:36
he is indeed the deusEx machina01:47:39
showing that the secret admiration that01:47:42
people in France had compared to01:47:44
this extraordinary poker move which01:47:47
had made de Gaulle by recognizing this01:47:49
country which as you know it was01:47:51
banned by the Americans from01:47:52
recognize Mao's China since 194901:47:55
all Western countries had01:47:56
Washington's ban on01:47:58
recognize mautetung China as01:48:00
today Western countries do not have01:48:02
no right to make01:48:04
deeper alliances with Cuba or01:48:06
with Venezuela or or with Iran therefore01:48:09
when de gaulf recognizes China01:48:11
diplomatically diplomatized China from01:48:13
Mao in 1964 it is exactly as if the01:48:17
president of the French Republic01:48:18
decided tomorrow to go to Tran to01:48:20
sign a strategic agreement with Tran01:48:22
and with01:48:23
inejad exactly the same01:48:26
thing in 1964 de Gaul will make two01:48:31
trips to Mexico in April and01:48:33
autumn throughout the cone01:48:35
South American and dozens of01:48:37
millions of Latin Americans will01:48:38
acclaim the voice of a sovereign Vance01:48:40
and independent of any bloc Mexico01:48:43
welcomes de Gaulle it is the parismch of01:48:46
March 28, 1964 the cover that makes its01:48:49
One on the incredible welcome given to01:48:52
Gaulle by the Mexicans of millions01:48:54
millions millions of people01:48:55
come to cheer de Gaulle because01:48:57
precisely he is the spokesperson for a01:49:00
West standing up to the United States01:49:02
who is the spokesperson for freedom01:49:04
of peoples and nations facing01:49:06
American imperialism is what01:49:08
made by Gaul at the time of Gaulle it is01:49:09
like today hougo Chavez but at the01:49:11
blood power because it's Charles01:49:14
de Gaulle because he is the great01:49:15
winner of the Second World War01:49:19
that's in Mexico but then in01:49:21
September, that's the front page of France01:49:24
we can't see it very well01:49:27
AP stopped cheering it's de Gaul01:49:31
caracass you also see a street01:49:34
absolutely full of people with a01:49:36
procession stopped and then people who01:49:39
throw away thousands and millions of01:49:41
btin pages as a welcome sign for01:49:44
Gaulle is on the front page of France Evening of the 23rd01:49:46
September 1964 go to the site of01:49:49
the National Audiovisual Institute01:49:51
to see these scenes 10 collective series01:49:53
when the President of the Republic01:49:54
French went to South America01:49:57
human tide in Ecuador a tide01:50:00
human in Cuito for the general of01:50:02
Gaulle millions of Brazilians in01:50:04
the streets and at the windows to welcome01:50:06
de Gaulle who has just come to bring01:50:09
this word from a country which is01:50:11
independent of American domination01:50:14
that's what de gale invented for01:50:16
escape American control and01:50:19
the European construction of which it01:50:21
couldn't go out and then01:50:23
1965 de Gaulle sets foot in the01:50:25
flat he warns the United States01:50:27
against what his economist Jacques RF01:50:30
called the deficit without tears he01:50:32
calls for respect for the gold standard and01:50:34
chords of Breton Woods and it makes01:50:36
repay French assets in gold01:50:37
dollars he understood that the Americans01:50:40
who are starting to run deficits01:50:42
if they no longer respect the heels of01:50:44
gold exchange will be able to create a currency01:50:46
with which a monkey currency with01:50:48
which they will be able to buy all the01:50:49
planet he sends ships from the01:50:51
French navy full of dollars01:50:53
accumulated by France as part of01:50:55
its balance of payments surplus01:50:57
with the United States and sends them to01:50:59
face of New York saying give us01:51:01
gold that goes in and out01:51:04
counterpart no need to tell you01:51:06
obviously the Americans will01:51:09
decide the fall of de Gaul but that01:51:12
continues in 1966 de Gaul invents the01:51:15
policy of detente which bears witness to the01:51:17
refusal of bloc politics look01:51:19
signing the agreement01:51:20
intergovernmental until we had01:51:23
no right to go to the Union either01:51:24
Soviet because until then01:51:26
it was the United States that decided and01:51:28
France of the 4th Republic was01:51:30
become the stooge of the Americans like01:51:32
currently we are the lackey of01:51:34
Americans de Gaulle BR decides01:51:38
to go to the USSR for 25 or 30 km these are01:51:41
thousands of Soviets who01:51:43
massage along the route look at these01:51:46
match coverage which relates01:51:48
weeks in a row the trip and in01:51:51
especially this one which is01:51:52
extraordinary where we see here01:51:53
Gaulle surrounded by Leonine Brenieev01:51:56
general secretary of the Communist Party01:51:58
of the Soviet Union Alexy Kossigin01:52:01
Minister of Foreign Affairs of01:52:02
the Soviet Union and Nicola Podgornik01:52:04
president of the Supreme Soviet, that is to say the01:52:06
three supreme leaders at the time in01:52:09
1966 they were called the Troyc before01:52:11
bregneev ends up dominating the01:52:13
others they had succeeded krushov01:52:15
so you know the three01:52:18
supreme leaders of the USSR stop01:52:20
all their activities for01:52:22
hold back with de Gaulle around him01:52:24
like the wise old man who asks01:52:26
advice, this is what France was like01:52:28
this time in01:52:30
196566 with chair politics01:52:33
vide de Gaulle imposes the right of veal01:52:35
states and puts a stop to the01:52:37
supranational mechanics he decides everything01:52:39
simply that the French will no longer go01:52:41
in Brussels and that they will no longer pay01:52:43
their contributions to the European Union and01:52:46
then in the process he decides to do01:52:49
take France out of command01:52:50
integrated NATO military and closes the01:52:52
American bases in France coup01:52:55
on a coup of brilliance on a coup of brilliance01:52:57
moreover he said on this occasion to01:52:58
perfit we stay in the utant because it01:53:00
there was the Warsaw Pact which01:53:02
objectively threatened militarily the01:53:04
France but said when the pact01:53:06
when the Berlin Wall is01:53:07
collapsed when communism01:53:09
once UTAN disappears it will no longer have any meaning01:53:12
NATO will have to disappear in what way01:53:14
was wrong since communism and01:53:17
the Warsaw Pact dissolved in01:53:20
1991 and subsequent years and01:53:23
that NATO far from dissolving and well01:53:26
has developed since now all01:53:27
Eastern European countries entered01:53:28
in NATO and NATO takes us01:53:30
now towards wars01:53:32
neocolonial in particular01:53:34
Afghanistan I will come back to it later in01:53:37
September 66 de Gaulle goes to Pnompen at01:53:41
Cambodia country of 4 to 5 million01:53:44
of inhabitants 5 million inhabitants to01:53:45
the time and there are hundreds of01:53:48
thousands of Cambodians it is a01:53:49
significant fraction of the population01:53:51
even from the country that comes to listen to de Gaulle01:53:53
at the Pnom pen stadium we see here01:53:55
besides prince sianou the head of01:53:57
prince Sianou who will tell de Gaulle you01:53:59
are the modern-day St. George01:54:02
because what does de Gaulle say he01:54:04
comes to warn Pnom Pen in 196601:54:08
the United States of America which is01:54:09
present the country next door in Vietnam and01:54:12
he solemnly warns him01:54:13
saying you are trying to01:54:15
get stuck and you have to leave Vietnam01:54:19
and then in01:54:21
1967 is a whole people in delirium01:54:23
Quebec de Gaulle goes to Montreal finally he01:54:26
goes up the Saint-Laurent he goes to Quebec01:54:28
then from there to Montreal and from01:54:30
balcony of Montreal town hall he launches01:54:32
long live free Quebec which will be mocked there01:54:35
understood in France by all our partners01:54:37
all our media which are already fagocited01:54:39
by American interests but which01:54:41
revenge brings true triumph01:54:44
in Quebec itself it goes in one go01:54:46
launch and show to the world01:54:49
the Quebec problem and the problem of01:54:51
independent of Quebec because in fact it01:54:53
its01:54:54
found in the Quebec problem01:54:57
and then finally it is the triumph in01:54:59
Communist Poland in01:55:01
1967 where he also launched this01:55:04
formula of an Atlantic Europe01:55:06
the Urals what does it mean01:55:08
simply a Europe that would allow itself01:55:10
to get out of control01:55:12
American so now we01:55:14
let's come to the 5th stupid question from Gaulle01:55:17
being dynamited01:55:20
service strategy01:55:23
of Europe and01:55:24
France what did the Americans do01:55:30
Americans did not stay both01:55:33
feet in the same01:55:34
sabot this is chapter 501:55:37
neutralization of Go and Gaulism01:55:39
by the Americans and their allies01:55:41
French because they had01:55:45
allies of Gaulle has just made his01:55:48
trip in 64 to South America in01:55:51
November so a few days after Paris01:55:55
Match makes its headline on this title01:55:59
Johnson will be tough against de Gaul01:56:04
war is declared because the journey01:56:06
of de Gaul in South America with the01:56:09
millions of people who went01:56:10
see Gaul obviously and understood by01:56:13
Washington as decidedly the fact that01:56:15
de Gaulle does not want to maintain01:56:17
the independence and sovereignty of the01:56:19
France which does not enter at all but01:56:21
not at all in the plans01:56:23
United States and so we will see01:56:25
increasingly arrive at the influence01:56:28
influencer services01:56:30
Americans on the political scene01:56:32
French through the media01:56:35
we are going to have the launch of a magazine01:56:37
The Express with jgss behind01:56:40
Jean-Jacques serving Schreber for the01:56:42
presidential campaign of 65 which will01:56:44
title who will launch a campaign01:56:45
Mr.01:56:48
against de Gaulle in fact what is it01:56:50
this is the first time in France01:56:51
so I was just a kid, I have a01:56:54
vague memory not everyone spoke01:56:56
that this is the first time that in01:56:58
France we did what we call it's01:56:59
an American marketing invention01:57:01
teaser tout teas in English that means01:57:04
intrigue that gave the word stripteas a01:57:07
teaser it was precisely of of of of01:57:10
launching a ghost application is not01:57:13
not French it's a method01:57:15
American in fact it was about01:57:17
throw it into the hands of De Gaulle01:57:19
presidential elections of December 6501:57:21
the first presidential elections01:57:22
auou universal suffrage Gaston de fer01:57:25
when the French discovered that01:57:26
it was Gaston de fer, the affair was in01:57:29
revenge comes to nothing but01:57:31
behind the Americans there were also01:57:33
the media coverage of Jean Le01:57:36
canuet first time we saw a01:57:39
politician with a smile like01:57:41
like in an American advertisement with01:57:44
with family listening to Jean Lecuet at the01:57:46
television it seems stupid to us but it01:57:48
you have to see that at the time it was a01:57:49
great innovation it was there there was01:57:51
only one television channel01:57:52
moreover and therefore this launch01:57:54
marketing have disconcerted de Gaulle from01:57:56
Gaulle thought he would be re-elected as soon as01:57:59
first round without campaigning he01:58:01
demonstrated in this case as01:58:03
other times too secure01:58:05
about him he didn't campaign he didn't01:58:07
didn't realize that the world was01:58:10
evolving and the Americans01:58:12
were launching against him01:58:14
new weapons weapons altogether01:58:17
influential news by media by01:58:20
soft power as they say01:58:21
seduction by music by evolution01:58:23
of customs and so on that he, a man of the 19th01:58:26
century did not see01:58:29
come they also launched another01:58:31
operation of which we are still01:58:33
victim and which comes out very well when01:58:35
we compare the two electoral posters01:58:37
of the presidential campaign of 6501:58:40
2nd round here it is here is the poster of01:58:43
Charles de Gaulle for the success of the01:58:46
France quite simply and what was01:58:50
the poster of his ur from the 2nd round François01:58:54
mitéran and well it was this poster there01:58:56
de Gaulle is isolated France01:58:59
François Mitéran is Europe and01:59:01
the friendship of01:59:04
people remember we saw everything01:59:06
the time that de Gaulle in 64 moved01:59:09
tens of millions of people01:59:11
through the01:59:12
continents we saw it elsewhere as I01:59:16
often recalls him returning from his01:59:19
great journey in South America Mauritius01:59:21
neck of the foreign minister01:59:23
gives a fairly sober account and01:59:26
still tell the ministers01:59:28
gathered together delirium which represented this01:59:30
travels the immensity of the crowds which01:59:33
are moved and GA will conclude01:59:36
majestic in a single formula saying01:59:38
yes that's it what para it is it's01:59:40
what we call it seems to be isolated01:59:43
in reality France was not at all01:59:45
isolated on the contrary since it01:59:47
was supported by the entire01:59:49
population of the world exactly01:59:51
moreover in the same way as01:59:52
when Dominique de Villepin in 200301:59:55
makes the speech at the UN against01:59:57
war in Iraq to oppose the01:59:59
American desire to wage war02:00:01
Iraq but at the same time we saw02:00:04
across the whole world of threads02:00:05
waiting to be created in front of alliances02:00:07
French to learn French02:00:09
buenoser in Mexico City in Beijing New Delhi02:00:13
Moscow lecer Sydney everywhere there was02:00:16
of N people around the world who02:00:18
wanted to relearn French because02:00:19
that suddenly this simple bear had02:00:22
brought the French software back to life02:00:25
what are the other peoples of the world waiting for?02:00:26
of France that is to say to be Asterix02:00:29
that is to say to be the country certainly we02:00:31
we are no longer a hyperpower but02:00:32
we have enough influence in02:00:34
the world if only through our02:00:36
story by the fact that we are the02:00:38
country of the French Revolution the country02:00:40
of human rights that we are and02:00:41
still a permanent member of the Council02:00:43
of security the whole world expects that02:00:44
France says no to the United States02:00:48
like she did in the 65s02:00:51
in any case as you see it gale02:00:52
it was not isolated France it was02:00:54
quite the opposite but you see that02:00:56
François Mitteran was in fact the agent02:00:59
anti-Gaulist and take advantage of Europe02:01:02
and allegedly due to the fact that de Gaul02:01:04
would isolate France when it was the02:01:06
contrary which was02:01:07
true so it's the big launch at02:01:10
from 64 65 of these operations of02:01:14
misinformation and02:01:15
intimidation of public opinion02:01:18
French we were told that being in02:01:20
outside of Europe it was isolated from02:01:21
world world be isolated from the world we02:01:24
we are here in the Jura a few02:01:26
tens of kilometers from Switzerland02:01:28
Is Switzerland an isolated country?02:01:30
of the world is it Korea?02:01:32
North is Norway which is not02:01:35
not in the European Union is that02:01:36
it's North Korea not Switzerland and02:01:38
Norway, the two countries in Europe which02:01:40
are not in the European Union are02:01:41
also those where we live best according to02:01:43
all Nations statistics02:01:45
United we are told that it is out of date02:01:48
that it is to be against peace that it is02:01:50
to be xenophobic is to be02:01:52
racist et cetera et cetera in brief in02:01:55
in short, it is the great triumph of02:01:57
propaganda European construction02:02:00
simply no longer has the right to be02:02:01
against and soon we won't even have the02:02:04
right to debate it and we will avoid everything02:02:07
debate and this is the situation in02:02:08
which one we are why is that02:02:11
I created this political movement on the 25th02:02:13
March 2007 on the very day of the 50th02:02:15
anniversary of the Treaty of Rome is02:02:17
to call on the French to come out and02:02:19
to impose that we have the right to02:02:22
talk that we have the right to debate02:02:24
because we are in a democracy in a democracy we have the02:02:26
right to talk about everything02:02:29
political ideas and to fight them if it02:02:31
THE02:02:33
So in this world everything has to be paid for02:02:36
in this world everything has to be paid for and we02:02:40
can increasingly estimate the02:02:42
historians are beginning to have a new02:02:44
look back at the past and begin to02:02:48
understand that May 68 was probably02:02:52
the first color revolution as02:02:55
the americans made in georgia in02:02:57
Ukraine et cetera over the years02:02:59
2000 oh certainly de Gaulle who was born in02:03:02
1890 was 78 years old in 1968 oh02:03:07
certainly he was overwhelmed by the02:03:09
events because being 78 years old in 196802:03:12
it's a bit like having 88 or 90 to02:03:15
our time people were in our time02:03:17
time people are younger and younger02:03:19
older if I dare say but02:03:22
de Gaulle had not seen the developments02:03:25
sociological studies of de Gaulle's France02:03:27
had not seen the number of students02:03:29
more and more people who02:03:30
would leave the school system with a02:03:32
diploma of scab had not seen02:03:34
the evolution of morals with the02:03:36
development for example of the fashion of02:03:38
Beatles et cetera so all these02:03:39
developments towards one that were going to go02:03:41
towards a a how would I say a02:03:43
breaking down of the shackles of societies02:03:45
traditional Western including02:03:48
the First Vatican Council was the point02:03:50
trigger one of the factors02:03:52
triggers from 1962 de Gaulle02:03:55
hadn't measured all that de Gaulle02:03:58
had maintained a policy which was02:03:59
rigid and therefore was overwhelmed by the02:04:02
events but what is still02:04:03
of course the Americans have them02:04:06
took the opportunity to add the maximum02:04:08
of oil on the fire to make it drop02:04:12
Gaulle we have a book that came out in02:04:15
2009 which is called secrets of course02:04:18
well kept by Vincent nouszi published by02:04:22
and look what it says inside02:04:23
the CIA is in r we are talking about the events02:04:26
of May 68 the CIA is actually delighted that02:04:29
the statue of Gaulle, the black beast of02:04:31
Americans for 10 years, finally02:04:33
shaken by domestic shocks02:04:36
manage to destabilize this general02:04:38
intractable on the international level he02:04:40
there are even rumors that the CIA02:04:42
would finance student unions whose02:04:44
the UNEF to cause harm to02:04:46
government Americans will be02:04:48
embarrassed by this allegation judged02:04:50
ridiculous deemed ridiculous by them02:04:54
obviously according to an American document02:04:56
confidential they will let the02:04:58
French government that this rumor02:04:59
has no basis and will be surprised that02:05:02
the authorities were able to give him some02:05:04
credit and ben02:05:06
yes because those around scabies and02:05:10
those around him understood that there was02:05:12
behind a great power which02:05:14
stirred all that we have thousands of02:05:16
testimony02:05:17
Ambassador Hariman Ambassador of02:05:20
United States ant demonstration in the02:05:23
Latin Quarter with a flourishing air02:05:27
the number 1 RTL Europe radio stations which02:05:29
was outside French territory02:05:30
which practically called on the French to02:05:32
the riot is how it happened02:05:34
after my 68 there is another book02:05:38
interesting by Jean-Pierre Farcass published02:05:40
in 98 which is called the pavement and this is what02:05:44
which he repeated in June 68 with Bendit02:05:46
declares to Hervé Bourge it seems that the02:05:49
CIA was interested in us these02:05:51
recently some newspapers02:05:53
and American subsidiary associations and02:05:55
CIA intermediary you see that he02:05:57
is still well documented02:05:58
American newspapers and associations he02:06:00
Ford Rockefeller et cetera subsidiary02:06:03
intermediary of the C offered us02:06:05
unnecessary large amounts of money from you02:06:06
say the welcome we gave them02:06:09
I would have liked them to tell us02:06:10
the welcome they gave them02:06:13
when we see that Mr. idiot Bendit02:06:16
is still on the political scene02:06:18
French after having been in Germany02:06:20
in Germany when he went to the02:06:22
German worm doing some of his02:06:23
political career he made02:06:25
notice to take a stand02:06:27
difference from all the German worms which02:06:28
were infiltrated by the Soviet KGB02:06:31
at the time of the SS20 crisis02:06:35
Bendit was the only German glass02:06:37
MP to German after campaigning in02:06:39
favor of the installation of persching02:06:41
Americans02:06:43
only serving strategic interests02:06:45
of the United States of America as in 196802:06:48
it served the strategic interests of02:06:50
United States of America02:06:52
and as now again it serves02:06:53
the strategic interests of the United States02:06:55
of America by claiming, for example, that02:06:57
France cedes its permanent seat to02:06:59
Security Council at the EUR Union nothing02:07:01
could no longer please02:07:03
United States than to see France clear02:07:05
of the Security Council he could at this02:07:08
momentl attack whoever wants it without02:07:10
have a new speech from 2003 like02:07:13
the war in Iraq these are the interests that02:07:16
serves02:07:17
objectively mr conbendit02:07:22
look at this photo European Parliament02:07:25
between Nicolas Sarkozi and Mr.02:07:27
conbendit do you find02:07:28
it really seems like one02:07:32
opponent while waiting for what was the real one02:07:35
assessment of my 68 the real assessment of my 6802:07:38
is that de Gaulle was saved by the02:07:41
kemelin through the Party02:07:43
French communist and the CGT who02:07:46
signed the Grenel agreements to02:07:48
fstop the general strike because the02:07:50
Kremelin wanted to understand that it was02:07:51
the Americans who were behind who02:07:53
wanted to bring down de Gaulle the CGT02:07:55
so signed she was also02:07:56
disowned George sei was disowned by02:07:58
its base there were for 15 days 302:08:02
weeks a month many problems02:08:03
because the base did not want02:08:05
to resume is a first divergence which02:08:07
will appear between the Communist Party02:08:08
French and the working class because02:08:10
the French working class at the time02:08:12
is such a victim of the media that he02:08:15
rather side with the opposition02:08:17
to de Gaulle rather than for what02:08:19
decided the PCF and the CGT who say02:08:21
you have to know how to end a strike02:08:23
moreover we will see the development02:08:25
after in the 70s the movements02:08:27
leftist style the CFDT et cetera all02:08:30
these movements you know the02:08:32
Trotskyist movements which are financed02:08:33
by the CIA everyone has known it since02:08:35
near World War II as FO02:08:37
the foo union was supported by the02:08:40
Americans in any case02:08:43
from the autumn of 68 de Gaul seeks to02:08:46
go away he said it's better02:08:49
leaving a year too long, only 5 minutes too long02:08:52
late he realizes that he has that he is02:08:54
overwhelmed by events he almost02:08:56
to falter at the end of my 68 you know02:08:58
he went he almost went he02:09:01
went to Baden Baden to see the general02:09:02
Massu who read said you have to go back02:09:05
the horse so he came back but the02:09:06
heart is no longer there de Gaulle is looking for a02:09:08
means of exit therefore makes the referendum02:09:11
on decentralization the reform of02:09:14
Senate and so on the participation of02:09:17
workers all this is a failure and02:09:20
so he only has 47% yes he02:09:22
resigns with panache and it's02:09:25
Georges Pompidou who in the meantime was02:09:27
went through the Rothschield bank which is02:09:30
elected and that is the real assessment of 166802:09:33
it is the election of Georges Pompidou and02:09:35
what is the election of George02:09:37
Pompidou and well December 1, 69 602:09:40
months after being elected 6 months after being02:09:43
elected pontpidou plants the 2nd shot02:09:46
stab in the back of deg the first02:09:47
that was the preamble02:09:50
interpretation of the Bundestag on the second02:09:53
it's de Gaulle who goes to the top02:09:54
European AE on December 1, 69 and02:09:57
who says the applications for membership to the EC02:09:59
of Great Britain and three others02:10:01
country the other three countries it is02:10:03
Denmark Ireland and Norway must be02:10:05
approached in a positive spirit02:10:07
that is to say that Pompidou02:10:10
actually buries the second element02:10:13
fundamental that de Gaulle had wanted02:10:14
bring to make a Europe02:10:16
European Pompidou will obviously be02:10:18
welcomed very quickly by the02:10:20
United States then all this and well it is02:10:23
the end of Gaulism that we are witnessing02:10:24
with Pompidou I don't even talk about02:10:27
others but all this to make a02:10:29
assessment who shapes opinion02:10:31
public in France the hearing02:10:34
average of television in France is02:10:36
3h30 per day 4h15 on Sunday depending on02:10:40
mediametry sources that’s more than02:10:42
1200 hours per year and now we are02:10:45
enter a universe which is this02:10:47
that you know well by the way02:10:49
it is the universe where the population02:10:51
French is placed in a state02:10:54
of hypnotism that is to say that from now on02:10:56
there is no longer any political discourse which02:10:59
hold there is more reasoning02:11:01
policy that now holds us02:11:03
we have a population that is02:11:05
completely02:11:07
hypnotized by a small screen which makes02:11:09
pass subliminal messages to you02:11:11
see where everything is covered02:11:14
except real ones02:11:16
problems we see it moreover what02:11:19
place02:11:21
and leave to the essential questions02:11:24
on the future of France which speaks to you02:11:27
as I spoke to you which introduces you02:11:30
our recent history which presents to you02:11:33
the American domination strategy02:11:35
on Europe and on France which02:11:37
talks about what France has been a very02:11:39
great state a great power02:11:41
independent and sovereign who is it02:11:43
who tells you about it02:11:45
still room for questions02:11:47
essential on the future of France02:11:49
none02:11:53
so why none and none02:11:55
because quite simply the media02:11:58
are owned by a few very02:12:00
circumscribed TF1 for example is possessed02:12:04
by buig then we mean the people of02:12:07
left say ah we see Sarkozi on tfin02:12:10
because Sarkozi is bug's friend but02:12:11
don't worry Sarkozi the friend of02:12:14
bug but bug he is also the friend of02:12:16
François Hollande from Moscow he is02:12:19
everyone's friend the problem he02:12:21
is not there the problem is that the02:12:23
bug is possessed up to 20% of its02:12:26
capital by Capital research and02:12:28
management American funds which is a02:12:30
pension fund which notably manages02:12:32
pensions02:12:34
California officials and therefore TF102:12:38
never can relay the type02:12:41
information that I02:12:44
similarly gives the group02:12:46
lagardire which owns Europe 1 which02:12:48
owns Paris Match which owns02:12:50
today who owns the Journal du02:12:52
Sunday which has part of the02:12:53
newspaper Le Monde which has part02:12:55
of NMPP the new messaging services of the02:12:57
Parisian press which allows02:13:00
to ride or make or kill a02:13:02
newspaper just put it in02:13:03
deventure or remove it from the02:13:05
deventure if you remove a log from02:13:06
the venture is practically not sold02:13:08
plus he loses 95% of his sales if he02:13:11
is no longer in danger therefore he who02:13:13
possessesinmpp has colossal power02:13:15
on the formation of public opinion02:13:17
in France and keep it well it sounds02:13:19
very French yes but more than 60 0% of02:13:21
capital of the custody are held by02:13:24
institutional investors02:13:25
foreigners as they say and in particular02:13:34
Americans then the 6th question bê02:13:37
since the Gaulish counter-strategy02:13:39
of independent Europe under the influence02:13:41
French was sabotaged by the02:13:43
Germans that Gaul and Gaulism have02:13:45
been neutralized in France and well02:13:47
what happened and well he02:13:48
happened what we see02:13:51
that we now see02:13:52
that is to say an unmanageable Tower of Babel02:13:55
become an American geopolitical glacci02:13:58
and we are headed for disaster02:14:01
absolute of our02:14:04
nation I don't want to take I don't02:14:07
does not want to play the prophets of02:14:09
the Apocalypse but all the French02:14:11
understand that things are getting worse02:14:12
and worse for all French people02:14:14
understand that there are things that they02:14:15
no longer understand that they02:14:17
recognize more in their own country02:14:19
it's this invisible war02:14:21
eh this unknown war that we were talking about02:14:23
François Mitteran that I described to you02:14:26
that I described to you at length02:14:28
and across from now the beginning02:14:30
of this conference to try to02:14:32
make people understand what is happening and that02:14:34
takes time to understand02:14:36
because it's a kind of war02:14:39
news of a completely new type it02:14:41
So it takes time to understand it02:14:44
we had the Europe of 6 in02:14:46
1962 Europe of 9 in 1973 after02:14:50
entry into the United Kingdom of Ireland and02:14:52
of Denmark you see in Europe02:14:53
6 France was at the center of02:14:54
operations with Europe of 9 France02:14:58
Europe turns towards the north with02:15:01
the entry of Greece in 1981 then02:15:04
the entry of Spain and Portugal02:15:06
rebalances towards the south but at each02:15:08
once France in the Europe of 12 it02:15:10
obviously weighs half as much as in02:15:12
the Europe of 6 especially with adults02:15:14
countries entered such as Spain02:15:16
the United Kingdom and then the Europe of 1502:15:20
in 1980 15 with Sweden, Finland and02:15:22
Austria02:15:23
imperceptibly we will see the countries02:15:26
English-speaking or easily able to use02:15:27
to the English language which will02:15:28
substitute France and language02:15:31
French and then after the Europe of02:15:33
Europe of 15 in 1995 we move on to02:15:36
Europe at 25 in 2004 with 10 new02:15:39
Eastern countries and each time the02:15:40
United States are there to bring in02:15:42
bring in bring in more and more02:15:44
no more state and then it’s Europe02:15:46
to 27 in 2007 with the entry of the02:15:49
Bulgaria and Romania in the meantime02:15:52
Europe at 29 in the future in02:15:54
a few months I'm talking we are in02:15:56
April 2012 you know that Croatia that02:15:59
it's done it's decided going in02:16:01
in Europe in a few months you02:16:03
know that the MA will be the 28th02:16:05
Macedonia will be the 2nd state there is02:16:08
Bosnia Albania who are on the ranks02:16:10
and then also Moldova and then02:16:12
also Armenia Georgia so and02:16:15
Turkey which will probably enter02:16:16
before 2020 it will be Europe of 3002:16:19
Europe at 33 with perhaps read Raine02:16:21
Georgia and Armenia and every time02:16:23
the United States is behind to do02:16:25
enter the maximum state you me02:16:27
understand to what extent the02:16:29
nonsense that we tell you about the02:16:31
fact that unity is strength it is a02:16:33
monstrosity there is already in02:16:36
the European Union at 27 we are already02:16:38
500 million people in the United States02:16:41
have 308 million inhabitants if02:16:43
actually it was necessary to have the most02:16:45
large number of inhabitants possible02:16:46
to weigh then the Americans would02:16:48
everything to prevent Europe02:16:51
develops and he will bring in ardar the02:16:53
Canada Mexico Venezuela Panama02:16:56
Costa Rica in the United States02:16:58
from America not at all it's not at all02:17:00
what they do along the Rio Grande02:17:02
in the border between the United States02:17:03
and Mexico shoots on sight02:17:06
Chicanos who want to enter the02:17:07
United States of America you know02:17:09
it is one of the most borders02:17:10
dangerous02:17:12
world therefore if the Americans do not want02:17:15
not want to merge02:17:17
merge with Mexico as they02:17:20
require Europe to increase more02:17:22
in addition, this also means that he02:17:25
there is a strategy behind which is that02:17:27
that I described to you there is no02:17:29
another way to explain to you what is happening02:17:31
then happens what happens today02:17:34
that's it, there are 27 states in the union02:17:36
European I would not have the02:17:38
the impudence of asking you elsewhere02:17:40
to describe to me all these states because02:17:42
the vast majority of French people do not02:17:43
don't even know anymore there are 27 states there are02:17:46
23 languages02:17:48
official German English02:17:50
Bulgarian Danish Spanish Estonian02:17:53
Finnish French Greek02:17:55
Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian02:17:57
Lithuanian Maltese Dutch02:18:00
Polish Portuguese Romanian02:18:02
Slovak, Slovenian, Swedish and02:18:04
tchck there are now three alphabets02:18:08
the roman alphabet hellenico alphabeto02:18:10
the Greek alphabet kiriria which is02:18:12
the Cyrilque alphabet introduced by the02:18:15
Bulgaria and 5 23 official languages and02:18:18
well if you are a mathematician you02:18:20
know that it gives 506 combinations02:18:23
possible translations with strokes02:18:26
phenomenal translations and like you02:18:28
know it without doubt we can find02:18:30
easily interpreters02:18:32
FrenchEnglish or French German that02:18:34
it runs the streets but on the other hand02:18:36
find an interpreter Léon finois or02:18:39
well Bulgarian Dutch or even I do02:18:43
don't know me Maltese Maltese Romanian02:18:46
it's already much more difficult so02:18:49
what's going on and let's move on02:18:51
through English and then02:18:53
gradually English becomes what02:18:55
linguists call a corner02:18:57
that is to say the language02:18:59
vernacular in 1962 when De Gaulle02:19:04
denounced the external unifier in02:19:06
the Europe of 6 there were only four02:19:09
official languages French02:19:12
German, Italian and Dutch02:19:14
English did not exist since there was no02:19:16
didn't have02:19:17
England in 1962 80% of documents02:19:21
of the EEC are in French it is the02:19:24
reason why de Gaulle could02:19:25
still imagine having a Europe02:19:28
French what happened to it02:19:30
well here is the evolution of the language02:19:32
of the original drafting of the documents02:19:33
the Commission in blue these are the02:19:35
documents in French in red it is in02:19:37
English in 1900 so I told you in02:19:40
1962 blue represented about 8002:19:42
% in 1986 we had fallen to 38%02:19:47
while documents in English02:19:48
represented 46% and and then you02:19:50
see that it was the evolution during02:19:53
for the last 15 years the 1602:19:55
recent years particularly with02:19:57
enlargement, well, yes, because02:19:59
everyone prefers to speak in02:20:01
Anglo-American therefore now the02:20:03
French has since fallen in 2007 we02:20:06
was at 12% we must now have fallen to02:20:09
about 7 or 802:20:10
% German other languages are02:20:13
even lower and the Anglo-American02:20:15
this is more than 90% of the documents in02:20:18
other words the trap closes02:20:23
inexorably there cannot be02:20:26
other Europe than one Europe02:20:28
American the working language of02:20:30
the European Union becomes exclusively02:20:34
Anglo-American French language02:20:36
undergoes a real rout or imposes02:20:39
its language is to impose its values and02:20:42
his vision of the world you saw02:20:43
moreover that it has been recognized in France that02:20:46
one could deposit in France02:20:47
patents in a foreign language, particularly in02:20:49
English what behind this this what02:20:52
goes the ball of thread that will happen02:20:54
unfold behind is that if we can02:20:56
file patents in English02:20:58
in France which violates nothing less than the02:21:00
Treaty of Viller Cotteray by François 102:21:02
of 1523 which required that all acts02:21:05
officials in France were in French02:21:07
so if we look back over four centuries02:21:10
of history eh we are going to submit some02:21:12
patents now in English in France02:21:15
and if the patents are in France in02:21:16
English deposited there will have to be02:21:18
has lawyers who can negotiate or02:21:21
deal with its patents in language02:21:22
English in02:21:25
France the stampede of French in the02:21:28
European authorities is correlated with the02:21:30
collapse of France's strategy02:21:32
in Europe and its place in the world02:21:35
that’s why what I’m talking to you about02:21:37
people say ah you are one02:21:38
nostalgiathat you are C you are that02:21:40
no it's about now we are02:21:42
attacked it is a struggle a war to02:21:44
dead as François Mitteran said afterwards02:21:48
14 years at the Élysée so we must add02:21:50
to this this burlesque phenomenon of this02:21:54
channel ploy I was talking about02:21:56
just now that's inflation02:21:57
community normative is the rhythm02:22:00
of exponential proliferation I would say02:22:02
almost cancerous metastatic number02:22:05
of European regulations here we02:22:08
have the number of pages in the Journal02:22:10
official of the European Communities02:22:12
therefore the number of pages of the regulations02:22:13
regulations you see between 1957 and02:22:17
1969 departure from de gaaule elsewhere we02:22:20
stay at a few hundred pages02:22:22
in total and you see what is02:22:24
the evolution with the transfers with the02:22:26
new treaties which transferred02:22:28
more and more power and02:22:30
enlargements eh currently we02:22:33
we have in 201102:22:35
250,000 pages of regulations02:22:37
Europeans currently02:22:39
European regulation is increasing02:22:41
about 100 more pages per day02:22:43
openable i.e. 12 pages02:22:46
additional per hour of work02:22:58
one more page every 5 minutes02:23:01
so besides the French say we02:23:03
can no longer stand these regulations which02:23:05
fall on SMEs on artisans and02:23:08
cetera we can't get enough of these zenarchs02:23:10
but it's not02:23:12
zenarchs it's not the zenarchs eh02:23:14
who make the regulations in France02:23:15
we must stop eh the laws02:23:17
regulations now it comes02:23:19
mainly from the European Union02:23:21
besides in France we are directed there02:23:23
is no longer enarc ENF to say Sarkozy is not02:23:24
not éarc Mr. Fillon is not zarc02:23:28
Madam the station was not zarc sir02:23:30
Barouin au finan is not zarque02:23:32
Mr. Thierry Breton was not02:23:34
zenarc Madame Morano is not02:23:36
zarque so we maintain the French02:23:39
in the illusion that he would be02:23:41
victim of a kind of technostructure02:23:44
delusional French woman I'm not saying he02:23:46
there are no criticisms to make but02:23:48
basically what we hide behind02:23:49
French that's it02:23:51
it is that in fact the immense machine02:23:53
bureaucracy that falls on us02:23:55
just02:23:56
Brussels besides here is the army02:24:00
mexican the mexican army what02:24:03
I call the Mexican army it's in02:24:05
matter of diplomacy for example which will02:24:08
deal with foreign policy02:24:10
now well you have Mr. F02:24:14
rompoy new permanent president of02:24:16
Council of the European Union I say02:24:17
new because you know it's02:24:18
an innovation of the Lisbon Treaty we02:24:21
said at the time of the constitution02:24:22
European it is necessary that the that Europe02:24:27
speaks with one voice as if the02:24:29
Europe's problem was that we had02:24:31
that a voice was missing it's not the02:24:33
problem if Europe is how would we say02:24:36
is a is is permanently02:24:39
conflicting is because it02:24:41
telescope of 27 national interests02:24:44
divergent therefore say that it was necessary that02:24:46
there is a man who represents02:24:47
Europe means making fun of the world by02:24:50
because if we give a guy who02:24:52
becomes permanent president of the Council02:24:54
of the European Union what will02:24:55
happen and well it's going to happen that the02:24:56
heads of state and government will02:24:58
work hard to appoint to this position02:25:01
someone who is a joke for02:25:03
that it does not overshadow anyone it is02:25:05
what is happening at the Organization of02:25:06
United Nations at the UN all states have02:25:09
national interests so much02:25:10
divergent whom he appoints as secretary02:25:12
UN general someone who is who02:25:15
flies away at the slightest breath in front eh02:25:17
you saw Mr. Banky Moon who is02:25:19
the secretary general enu we don't have02:25:20
never seen a UN Secretary-General02:25:22
also color of the Murail and evanescent02:25:24
even though the competition was02:25:26
rough and well it's the same at the Union02:25:28
European we named Monsieur Van02:25:30
break this urlu Berlu which moreover02:25:32
no one, no one cares02:25:33
moreover since he was appointed but02:25:35
he deals with foreign policy and he02:25:38
is the president of the union council02:25:40
of the European Union it is02:25:42
flanked by a Minister of Affairs02:25:45
foreigners of the European Union who02:25:46
apparently should give more weight to02:25:49
the European Union which is Madame02:25:51
Catherine Ashton who was a02:25:52
Labor and then as you know02:25:54
England is a monarchy02:25:56
aristocratic and therefore as she had02:25:58
done as she had been as she02:26:00
had maneuvered well she was ennobled02:26:03
by the Queen of England she is02:26:04
became Lady Catherine Ashton ofand she02:26:07
is a baroness is a baroness02:26:09
labor he as I often say02:26:10
When will the Marxist duchesses02:26:13
Leninists this Labor baroness02:26:15
she is the High Representative of02:26:16
the European Union for business02:26:17
foreign and security policy02:26:19
it is common knowledge02:26:21
totally incompetent but what is02:26:23
certain it is that she is completely02:26:25
aligned with American interests and02:26:27
Atlanticists and then we must add02:26:29
Mr Barroso, President of the02:26:31
European Commission which also takes care02:26:33
business02:26:34
foreigners so this is already three02:26:37
people who do business02:26:40
foreigners within the Commission02:26:42
European or council but it is necessary02:26:45
add other people you have to02:26:47
add Mr Junker02:26:48
Luxembourgish who is the president02:26:50
of the Eurogroup which takes care of the02:26:52
international monetary issues and02:26:55
so he spends his time going to02:26:56
meet with your counterparts you have to02:26:59
add this curiosity is that there is02:27:02
a non-rotating president of Europe he02:27:05
is appointed for 2 and a half years but there is02:27:07
a rotating president who remains who02:27:10
is the one that changes every 6 months02:27:11
since every 6 months there is a02:27:14
change of the country which makes the02:27:15
Presidency of the Council then instead of02:27:18
delete this post since we had created02:27:20
a position of 2 and a half years we maintained02:27:22
with lower prerogatives therefore02:27:25
you have a president who turns all02:27:28
the 6 months and a chairman of the board02:27:30
which runs every 2 and a half years02:27:32
would say a little bit you know02:27:33
solar system and therefore who it is02:27:35
practically astrology calculations02:27:37
to know which planets02:27:38
places they are and then don't forget02:27:41
not that we should also add the chefs02:27:43
of State and the heads of diplomacy of02:27:46
other countries in France for example us02:27:48
we have the President of the Republic02:27:51
French Mr. Sarkozi on this 2702:27:54
April 2012 and Mr. Jupet Minister02:27:59
of Foreign Affairs and well02:28:01
imagine that they are in politics02:28:03
foreign, that’s the point02:28:05
one of the main interests of the02:28:08
office of President of the Republic02:28:10
and this is the exclusive interest of the role02:28:12
of Minister of Foreign Affairs don02:28:14
if we wanted Europe to talk about a02:28:16
only voice should be deleted02:28:18
purely and simply the position of min02:28:20
French Minister of Affairs02:28:22
foreigners what is the point of it02:28:24
maintain if we want Europe to speak02:28:25
with one voice if we maintain it02:28:27
it's good because France has02:28:28
national interests that it cannot02:28:30
ignore it's not just France02:28:32
since Mrs Merkel the Chancellor02:28:34
German does the same with the minister02:28:37
Business German02:28:39
foreigners besides I'm going to ask you02:28:41
a small02:28:42
question who is the german minister02:28:46
Business02:28:47
foreigners what is his name02:28:54
it's still enough02:28:56
curious our ancestors our parents our02:28:59
grandparents in 1935 if we told them02:29:02
who is the Minister of Affairs02:29:03
German foreigners he02:29:05
knew how to apply sir02:29:09
ROP if asked was the minister02:29:11
of English Foreign Affairs he02:29:14
also knew sir02:29:17
Chamberlin now we don't even know02:29:20
then we know who the minister of02:29:21
foreign affairs american madam02:29:22
Hillary Clinton but we don't even know02:29:24
plus what are the names of the ministers02:29:25
Foreign Affairs not even to say02:29:27
the name of the heads of government of02:29:29
States of Europe it's very interesting02:29:31
as a remark this means that far02:29:34
European construction is supposed to us02:29:36
make us closer it makes us closer02:29:37
more and more distant and indifferent02:29:40
each other the minister of affairs02:29:42
German foreigner is called sir02:29:44
Guido Westervell sticks his tongue out at us02:29:46
in this photo it is necessary to add the02:29:49
British Prime Minister and02:29:51
the Minister of Foreign Affairs02:29:52
British called Mister02:29:54
William hag we must add the First02:29:58
minister02:29:59
spanish gentleman what is his name02:30:03
besides the prime minister02:30:07
spanish monsieur radjoy and monsieur02:30:09
Garcia who is Minister of Affairs02:30:11
Spanish foreigners must be added02:30:13
Mr Mario Monti the president of02:30:15
Italian Council and Mr. TER of02:30:17
santagata who is the minister of02:30:20
Italian foreign affairs we must02:30:21
also add the Polish president02:30:24
Polish Prime Minister Mr Tusk02:30:26
we must add President Messère02:30:28
of Slovakia the president of Romania02:30:30
Mr. Vaslav Kaos of the Republic02:30:32
Czech their Minister of Affairs02:30:33
foreigners et cetera et cetera et cetera02:30:35
in short if we add the number of02:30:38
heads of state of heads of government of02:30:40
foreign ministers of02:30:42
European Affairs Ministers more02:30:44
the leaders of the institutions02:30:46
Europeans who are all supposed02:30:48
take care of foreign affairs and who02:30:50
are all supposed to speak with one voice02:30:52
well we arrive exactly at02:30:55
more than 100 government officials02:30:58
who speak 23 different languages and02:31:00
who are all supposed to talk about one02:31:03
voice this is how the Union works02:31:05
European more exactly as it does not02:31:07
does not work, the self-locking is perfect02:31:11
it is the one that has been thoughtfully meditated02:31:14
from the end of the Second World War02:31:16
by the United States of America and which02:31:18
achieves something absolutely02:31:21
convincing we welcome02:31:24
a truly united Europe as said02:31:26
George buou at the University of Warsaw02:31:29
on June 15, 2001 in fact they have what it takes02:31:33
laugh there is something to laugh about02:31:37
to see the United States forcing us02:31:39
to integrate more and more State and02:31:41
the more States we integrate, the more we02:31:43
we are tied up in something which is02:31:45
unmanageable and we are in the process of02:31:47
disappear as a historical actor02:31:50
moreover never since the Middle Ages02:31:53
the countries of Europe weighed so little02:31:57
that currently 7 years ago sir02:32:01
Sarkozi in the newspaper Libération on 2202:32:04
April 2005 made this confidence02:32:08
if you vote no in the 2005 referendum02:32:12
it won't even make you happy02:32:15
go keep Europe as it is02:32:18
and you will continue to die or02:32:22
so vote yes anyway it doesn't02:32:23
can't be worse than today you02:32:26
want to change Europe then vote yes02:32:28
I remember from this statement02:32:30
several things when Mr. Sarkozi02:32:32
says if you vote no it won't make you02:32:33
not even happy he's lying I voted02:32:36
no it made me very happy02:32:37
more than 55% of French people voted no02:32:40
then when he said in 2005 of all02:32:43
way it can't be worse02:32:44
that today he was lying since the02:32:46
situation 2012 is much more serious02:32:48
than it was in 2005 and moreover if02:32:51
we continue like this in 201902:32:54
will still be much more serious than in02:32:56
2012 but above all what I remember from02:32:59
all this is just Mr. Sarkozy who02:33:01
was not yet president of the02:33:02
Republic at the time02:33:05
knew he knew eh you are going to keep02:33:09
Europe as it is you go02:33:11
keep dying anyway02:33:12
can't be worse than today that's it02:33:14
what they say in02:33:16
confide our leaders then I02:33:20
Mr Sarkozy but I can02:33:21
ensure that in the corridors of power02:33:24
the UMP to the PS to the Modem and everyone02:33:29
senior officials leaders02:33:31
politicians know that it is a02:33:33
disaster they know it02:33:37
perfectly how many people I saw by02:33:40
example of senior officials or02:33:41
leader say since the enlargement of02:33:44
2004 since we went from 15 to 2502:33:47
then 27 it no longer works at all we02:33:49
should never have done this02:33:51
enlargement I heard several02:33:53
ministers of senior officials me02:33:54
all say the same thing and what is the02:33:56
conclusion that they draw from it and well we02:33:59
will go from 27 to 28 with the entry of the02:34:01
Croatia that is to say they do the02:34:03
diagnosis that should never have been made02:34:05
this enlargement and and it leaves02:34:08
proceed with a new membership which02:34:11
proves that they no longer have the controls02:34:14
which proves that those who decide are02:34:16
others that there are no longer in France02:34:18
someone who decides the future of the02:34:20
Maison France the strategy was02:34:23
stolen then the question is that all02:34:26
European leaders know02:34:27
clearly that Europe of 27 is02:34:29
unmanageable and that it leads us to02:34:31
disaster they know it they know it02:34:35
know then why is he hiding it02:34:37
people and quite simply because02:34:40
that he lacks courage that they areDescription:
Conférence de François Asselineau enregistrée le 27 Avril 2012 upr.fr ----- 0:00:12 Introduction et annonce de 9 questions bêtes 0:02:59 1re question bête : qu'a découvert François Mitterrand ? 0:52:51 2e question bête : pourquoi les États-Unis poussent-ils tellement à la construction européenne ? 1:20:04 3e question bête : si de Gaulle avait compris, pourquoi n'est-il pas sorti de la « construction européenne », et pourquoi a-t-il même parfois donné l'impression de la soutenir ? 1:38:02 4e question bête : puisque l'« Europe à la française » qu'essayait de monter de Gaulle a échoué, que décida-t-il de faire ? 1:55:13 5e question bête : de Gaulle parvenant à contrer la stratégie des États-Unis, que firent ces derniers pour reprendre les rênes de la « construction européenne » ? 2:13:35 6e question bête : les gaullistes ayant été neutralisés, que s'est-il passé après ? 2:34:59 7e question bête : pourquoi les États-Unis sont-ils sûrs de pouvoir continuer à dominer la « construction européenne » ? 3:24:37 8e question bête : quelles sont les conséquences géopolitiques de ce qui est présenté depuis le début de la conférence ? 3:43:11 9e question bête : à quoi sert votre bulletin de vote ? 4:01:00 Alors que faire ? 4:10:04 Conclusion
Preparing download options
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players
Questions about downloading video
How can I download "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU" video?
http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.
Which format of "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU" video should I choose?
The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.
Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU" video?
The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.
How can I download "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU" video to my phone?
You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.
How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU"?
The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.
How can I save a frame from a video "Qui gouverne la France et l'Europe? - Version Intégrale - François ASSELINEAU"?
This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.
What's the price of all this stuff?
It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.