background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon
header logo icon

Download "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)"

input logo icon
"videoThumbnail Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)
Similar videos from our catalog
|

Similar videos from our catalog

Video tags
|

Video tags

ВЕИП
Психоанализ
Образование
Психология
Лекция
Вебинар
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:02
this is
00:00:09
Oleg,
00:00:16
but now it’s a little bit to guard us, they did
00:00:21
n’t come, they might be late online,
00:00:25
so let’s get started,
00:00:29
I brought the full schedule and you don’t
00:00:33
know, after that you will have any
00:00:35
seminars, how
00:00:36
many does
00:00:39
this semester have, yes yes yes, by the way, we have
00:00:46
at next Friday there are more seminars and in
00:00:49
my opinion there are a few more one things about this and
00:00:52
but what I’m actually saying is that today we have a
00:00:55
small text and I think that I can
00:00:58
just sort it out there
00:01:01
further fast settings for rumors of
00:01:05
which seminars in your group which are not
00:01:07
but I remember what’s next there are already some
00:01:09
larger texts and it is assumed
00:01:12
that you are violating the salts, so
00:01:17
yes, but that’s what we usually do, that’s what we
00:01:18
usually read, and therefore it’s broken and in the
00:01:21
next one it will be about the question of
00:01:23
amateurish analysis, let’s get more of them,
00:01:28
I don’t know,
00:01:34
but we usually it’s just that this is probably the first
00:01:37
such small text and that’s why
00:01:41
they usually do it by sharing their impressions and
00:01:44
how they ask questions, but here it’s possible and almost
00:01:50
none, and if you have any comments
00:01:52
right away, let’s share your
00:01:54
impressions, you
00:01:58
can read it right away,
00:02:02
again, I don’t know the necessary services to become,
00:02:07
okay let's read further
00:02:11
okay
00:02:13
or are you reading what these I first
00:02:16
read is how our patients
00:02:19
tell the coming sexual if
00:02:21
during analytical work gives us a
00:02:23
reason for some interesting observation
00:02:25
now you think that I want to say
00:02:27
something is visible but in fact I’m not
00:02:29
like that we understand that this is the rejection of
00:02:32
depressing thoughts through the project and
00:02:34
you ask who this
00:02:37
person of dreams could be this is not the mother we are making
00:02:40
corrections the publishers this is the mother we
00:02:43
reserve the right when interpreting not to
00:02:45
take into account the denial and chooses the
00:02:47
content if in its pure form it is as
00:02:50
if the patient said although
00:02:52
the thought of a mother did not occur to me in connection with this person, I have
00:02:54
no desire to acknowledge
00:02:56
them;
00:02:58
this seems to me to be a well-known example,
00:03:07
but by the way, it is interesting in analysis very
00:03:10
often 2 that, in principle, this projection
00:03:13
even without a special subject, that is,
00:03:16
now we probably think about there’s
00:03:17
something bad about me,
00:03:20
drive me out after us
00:03:25
even with your analysis and often you think that
00:03:30
well, this is it, I definitely don’t think
00:03:33
now and then
00:03:36
don’t think if you’re ours in your head, that means you’re
00:03:38
thinking about it, it
00:03:41
really works, that is, it’s
00:03:43
day here this is purely
00:03:47
chemical, and then I want to just
00:03:51
rub it for 60 minutes,
00:03:55
sometimes there is a complete explanation of the
00:03:56
repressed unconscious, you can
00:03:58
find a very convenient way to ask
00:04:01
the question, what do you consider the most incredible
00:04:03
in that situation, what do you think you arrays
00:04:05
will be when to me more if the patient
00:04:08
falls into a trap and does not name
00:04:10
what he is less likely to think about, then by doing this he
00:04:13
almost always gives out the true situation. A
00:04:14
very beautiful addition to this experience is
00:04:17
often created for you in a patient
00:04:19
suffering from obsessive-compulsive neurosis
00:04:21
who has already been brought to an understanding
00:04:23
of his symptoms. I have a new
00:04:25
obsessive idea of ​​mine with him not
00:04:28
from it immediately occurred to me that it could
00:04:30
mean such and such, but no, this
00:04:32
cannot be true, because
00:04:34
otherwise the cops could not have it,
00:04:36
of course, what he rejects with the help of
00:04:38
justification for borrowed radiation
00:04:40
is the true meaning of the new one began to
00:04:43
pester to
00:04:49
take for such a way to deceive the censorship,
00:04:57
that is, as it were, some kind of
00:05:00
alienation of the
00:05:01
content of the statement, I do
00:05:04
n’t want this kind of statement,
00:05:13
but actually exactly the same to
00:05:15
ask against,
00:05:20
that is, I’m saying this, but this is not the top, yes it
00:05:24
turns out, but this is not my thought and
00:05:26
because my thought to me it
00:05:35
will be unacceptable further this will unfold, but in
00:05:38
essence, this me is, as
00:05:41
it were, already divided into that part of my me
00:05:45
that I am ready to recognize, this part of my
00:05:47
me that I am not ready to recognize me
00:05:51
here, here I am, and I am reality and I am
00:05:54
pleasure, but
00:05:59
this is the question if
00:06:02
we consider in the case of schreiber, and
00:06:05
when, for example, this thought came to him
00:06:08
that it would be good to
00:06:11
feel like a woman during a sexual act,
00:06:13
and well, how would it be,
00:06:18
but it has something to do with it, what
00:06:20
is it, what did they wear, turned it away,
00:06:22
although no, but with Freud there is work or
00:06:26
I don’t remember exactly what it’s called:
00:06:27
advancement of reality in psychosis, which is not the enemy,
00:06:31
different mechanisms begin to work in
00:06:34
principle, yes there if that breaks through
00:06:36
because it was like a state of sleep,
00:06:38
practically yes this structure was
00:06:40
weakened, so he seemed to notice this
00:06:43
thought before starting what to do next, he is, in
00:06:46
principle, unable to accept his own and
00:06:49
in fact, he
00:06:50
creates a whole frame for it, that is, he
00:06:53
rebuilds a whole new world so that this
00:06:56
thought, as signed, so that it is mute
00:06:58
and so that its card and this desire are
00:07:00
satisfied, but how the desire of another
00:07:02
turns out in psychosis is it will trigger
00:07:06
delirium, but in neurosis it will simply be,
00:07:09
well, like denial until the night, but this is not what I
00:07:13
thought,
00:07:20
therefore the content of a repressed
00:07:23
idea or thought can penetrate into
00:07:25
consciousness, provided that denying
00:07:28
denial is a way to
00:07:30
get to know the repressed entity; this is
00:07:33
already elimination by repression, but of course
00:07:35
not yet acceptance of the wall, we see how
00:07:38
here the intellectual function
00:07:39
is separated from the effective process with
00:07:42
the help of negation, only
00:07:44
one consequence of the repression process is annulled,
00:07:46
which is that the content of
00:07:48
ideas is not achieved, knowledge
00:07:50
follows from this, a kind of
00:07:53
intellectual acceptance of the repressed
00:07:54
while maintaining the repression is essentially
00:07:57
analytical work, we often
00:08:00
create another very important, very
00:08:02
surprising change in the same situation,
00:08:04
we also manage to overcome denial and
00:08:07
achieve complete intellectual
00:08:09
acceptance of the repressed, but this does
00:08:11
not eliminate the process of repression itself,
00:08:17
it turns out where he wrote about what is
00:08:22
unconscious, in my opinion, that the
00:08:28
analyst has him if he his
00:08:30
interpretation, then he must hold it well, as it were,
00:08:32
and concepts, as it were, to hear
00:08:34
here now these are different things, reading
00:08:36
about this reminded me of it, it seems to me that this is
00:08:39
actually
00:08:41
so to speak, but this is
00:08:45
the history of the formation of psychoanalysis, that is,
00:08:48
in fact,
00:08:49
but as it were, and not like when you arrive and
00:08:52
apply hypnosis and there was a rollback of the optical
00:08:54
method that was not used, that is,
00:08:56
well, we get directly to
00:08:58
the unconscious, this content of
00:09:00
some thoughts to the one he needs, but if
00:09:02
we then tell the patient that experience in
00:09:04
this, that if he was not ready to accept
00:09:06
it, then he will not accept and Freud, and
00:09:08
at first, also in analysis, think, well, okay,
00:09:11
I’ll tell you what the reason is and how
00:09:13
great we were cured, but the ceiling
00:09:16
understands that until then we must first
00:09:17
wait so that the person himself is ready for
00:09:19
this thought, they want to build their psyche until
00:09:21
otherwise it’s easy to fuel.
00:09:25
intellectual acceptance, it’s
00:09:27
really not difficult, it’s just that it gives, well, but
00:09:28
it really doesn’t
00:09:31
give anything at all, but well, maybe it does
00:09:33
n’t give such a final
00:09:35
result, but maybe it doesn’t matter, but how
00:09:38
can it start some kind of process that
00:09:40
somehow it will appear in physical
00:09:43
reality already and or or Lily don’t laugh I
00:09:46
don’t know how well this is, well, how much of a
00:09:48
normal analogy it
00:09:50
seems to me it’s about the same as well, I don’t
00:09:52
know if you read Dostoevsky there, you read the
00:09:55
cul of Dostoevsky to embroider
00:09:57
it, I read it, so what and then 20 years
00:09:59
later, maybe it dawned on you and that is,
00:10:01
it’s clear that because when there is
00:10:03
work, it’s again edging, it will work
00:10:05
and why it will work because this
00:10:08
time for this thought has already come to the end
00:10:10
time and it can already, that is, well,
00:10:13
probably some kind of interpretation it
00:10:14
can give something
00:10:26
so you need
00:10:29
because the task of the function of
00:10:31
intellectual judgment is to
00:10:34
affirm or deny the content of
00:10:37
thoughts
00:10:39
the above remarks lead us to the
00:10:41
psychological origin of this
00:10:43
function denies something judgment
00:10:46
means it is something that I
00:10:48
would most like to repress judgment
00:10:51
insert intellectual replacement
00:10:54
of repression of the word no its distinctive
00:10:56
feature specificity you origin
00:10:59
similar to my information
00:11:01
through a symbol description and that is not
00:11:04
exempt from restrictions for
00:11:06
embossing to be enriched with content from
00:11:08
which you cannot block
00:11:11
so the task of the function of intellectual
00:11:13
drying is not to bother the statement or the thoughts ourselves with
00:11:17
friends
00:11:18
from this we come to psychologically,
00:11:38
that is, further we just move on,
00:11:40
it seems to me that this is not why the moment of this
00:11:42
entertainment is when I am
00:11:45
pleasure and I am reality for
00:11:48
the enjoyment
00:11:50
of pleasure,
00:11:52
so the structure of our self, which strives
00:11:56
in judgment, has only these pleasant
00:11:59
things, that is, we
00:12:01
remove, as it were, from sight everything that is
00:12:03
unpleasant to us priest
00:12:06
I of reality is something that will already
00:12:08
deal with
00:12:09
intellectual judgment and that is, something
00:12:12
that will introduce some unpleasant
00:12:14
things
00:12:15
accompanied by this denial,
00:12:18
that is, due to this we can
00:12:21
take this thought that is unpleasant for us
00:12:23
if it is accompanied by this
00:12:25
these are the kings,
00:12:38
respectively, but here, in principle, it
00:12:40
seems very interesting to me that
00:12:42
the idea that repression is, well,
00:12:45
such a primary mechanism of division into
00:12:49
which allows the principle of
00:12:53
contentment and dissatisfaction to be implemented,
00:12:59
yes, keep in mind that usually repression
00:13:01
is voiced in the vein in the context and outside the mouth
00:13:04
we repress something Yes, here it turns out that
00:13:07
repression is like this, but these are not the first in
00:13:10
the work, it turns out that repression itself is a
00:13:12
mechanism that allows the
00:13:14
principle of dissatisfaction to exist, that is, this
00:13:16
separation is good, it brings
00:13:18
pleasure, I take it, but what doesn’t
00:13:21
bring me pleasure, I ignore it,
00:13:26
this is a very interesting idea,
00:14:03
but at the same time, what interesting again,
00:14:06
denial actually does not mean
00:14:09
deletion but does not mean disappearance,
00:14:13
embossing just writes that this
00:14:16
intellectual acceptance has supplanted
00:14:19
the press, they have their own, that is, it exists, that
00:14:22
is, we introduce this intellectual
00:14:23
function that does not eliminate the initial
00:14:26
deduction,
00:14:32
but gives us the opportunity to operate with
00:14:34
such the spirit anime from which
00:14:38
thinking cannot enter into its work, that
00:14:44
is, it seems to me that this
00:14:48
actually turns out to be an idea that, again,
00:14:51
between the principles of pleasure and the principle of
00:14:53
reality there is no cabe clear boundary such as a
00:14:56
smooth transition between
00:14:59
embossing and description, that is, they do not have
00:15:01
any differences that allow Paris
00:15:04
here we first we are guided by
00:15:06
repression and then we move from the
00:15:08
intellectual functions of negation and
00:15:10
repression thereby eliminating our
00:15:13
judgment they well in fact it seems to me that
00:15:15
this is what he just said about
00:15:18
secondary nationalization we can give this
00:15:21
intellectual reasoning
00:15:23
but at the same time they will be justified by
00:15:24
our reluctance to recognize that is, these are
00:15:27
not things that can be
00:15:29
opposed; the
00:15:35
essence and function of condemnation must
00:15:38
make two decisions; it must
00:15:41
confirm or reject the presence of a certain
00:15:43
thing in a certain quality; and it
00:15:46
must accept or dispute the
00:15:48
existence of what is
00:15:50
in reality the
00:15:52
properties regarding which a
00:15:54
decision must be made initially could
00:15:57
be good or bad useful or
00:15:59
harmful being amazed in the language of the most ancient
00:16:02
oral impulses of drives I want to
00:16:05
eat this or I want this you don’t care more
00:16:08
sends the purpose of this I want to introduce this into myself
00:16:10
and exclude this from myself that is, this
00:16:13
must be in me or in her to me the
00:16:16
original enjoyer I desires
00:16:19
as shown by me elsewhere
00:16:21
introjection good and discard go
00:16:24
further bad bad alien I who
00:16:26
are outside began to him identically the
00:16:34
last
00:16:39
incomprehensibly
00:16:44
often hour 17
00:16:49
the function of condemnation must make a decision
00:16:51
that is, firstly we explain with the help of a step
00:16:56
have what quality to grab because
00:16:58
she is in fact good bad and
00:17:03
in fact I want to project or I
00:17:05
want to spit it out I want to create for
00:17:07
her to exist and for it to be me or
00:17:10
for her not to exist
00:17:14
and for the second moment it did
00:17:17
n’t come here dear swear in Russia and the
00:17:20
bad breast is glad
00:17:22
yes, here is the second moment here the
00:17:26
function of the cube of reality appears, yes, that is, do you recognize the
00:17:29
existence of
00:17:31
what is a representation in reality,
00:17:33
we have an idea, but to what extent does this
00:17:36
representation correspond to reality,
00:17:40
that is, as soon as we
00:17:43
introduce the discussion,
00:17:46
as it were, the presence of both good and bad, they are so
00:17:50
good means judgment, so to
00:17:52
speak, representation is, if bad is
00:17:54
in my opinion, displacing if we
00:17:57
accept the discussion and good is bad,
00:18:01
then this gives us the opportunity to take the
00:18:04
next step and
00:18:06
find out if this is something that is in
00:18:09
our idea, it exists in
00:18:11
reality,
00:18:17
and
00:18:22
in fact, Freud has it in the same
00:18:27
in this, in my opinion, tons of either in
00:18:30
the paint
00:18:33
involving the fact and more, here the position of the
00:18:36
two principles of a mental event
00:18:40
is at this moment of transition between
00:18:43
this one, the first one, as it were,
00:18:45
take the word stage, yes, when we
00:18:48
have only repression and only
00:18:52
the principle of pleasure when there is either I
00:18:54
or everything else doesn’t interest me, that
00:18:58
is, in fact, that’s what my loves and,
00:19:01
in short, is aimed at I, and
00:19:04
accordingly there is, well, conditionally, he
00:19:06
separates love and
00:19:08
there is no involvement, he separates
00:19:10
love and indifference, yes, that is,
00:19:14
either well, no matter what I or no matter what, that
00:19:18
is there is no letter, or
00:19:19
this one goes on with the appearance of
00:19:22
this judgment, it gradually
00:19:24
appears when
00:19:26
an object itself appears that has some property
00:19:28
or quality of good or bad, but in
00:19:31
love the opposite of
00:19:33
indifference appears, hatred until either there is
00:19:35
something good and it is like if
00:19:37
something bad is projected to them or to her, it
00:19:40
is rejected, and in fact, the
00:19:42
differences between the outside world will be good and
00:19:46
bad,
00:19:56
and here, as was the case in this
00:19:58
paragraph, the transition to the next stage, that
00:20:00
is, if there is some
00:20:03
object in reality about which I must
00:20:06
make a
00:20:07
decision is he good or bad,
00:20:14
but here differences already appear:
00:20:18
I’m not good, but the rest is bad, that it’s
00:20:23
real or that it’s unreal, something is
00:20:25
real or only, as it were, subjective, that
00:20:27
is, it is only in my
00:20:29
imagination, or something is also an
00:20:31
obligation,
00:20:33
that is, new to really put
00:20:36
this resolution in relation to
00:20:57
Eugene, we all ask him to confuse him,
00:21:00
to give in,
00:21:03
no, if only the
00:21:05
last couple of sentences are
00:21:08
officially reasoning, this wishes to be
00:21:11
shown in exactly such a place to unify
00:21:13
all the good ones, throw away all the bad things, and
00:21:17
I am a real hell to begin the inheritance as it is
00:21:22
not identical, it is not clear, but it seems to me
00:21:25
it’s
00:21:26
just,
00:21:29
well, it’s just according to and
00:21:31
on your own look at page
00:21:34
6 diligently of the microsemi company I say
00:21:37
minus
00:21:42
you but how would this life pressure
00:21:49
you have this footnote what look and
00:21:53
eat the sock and well there is it
00:21:58
now
00:22:03
from
00:22:04
here it seems to me this one it is carefully
00:22:06
described in detail to explain the tarik,
00:22:10
my page is not specified,
00:22:14
I can open it for him, well, where can
00:22:28
you find it, you can find this suit by searching,
00:22:42
well, we love you, don’t tell me how many approximately
00:22:44
pages of the beginning, maybe
00:22:46
about a hundred and six,
00:22:49
or but I pierced the agr from the beginning of the attraction of
00:22:53
their fate and but if you open it,
00:22:56
it’s a lot only at the end
00:23:00
of the end
00:23:02
[music]
00:23:06
but there is, for example, a paragraph that,
00:23:08
starting with you, love, hate, which
00:23:12
seems to be filled with material minutes of
00:23:14
opposites when
00:23:17
reading this stick,
00:23:20
love and mercy
00:23:24
to me, but how is the relationship to an object,
00:23:25
other love happens no,
00:23:29
well, actually this one end 107 jump off
00:23:33
and we need the page 6 for everyone the
00:23:36
prisoner with dots just
00:23:39
begins with the words I the subject connects
00:23:41
with pleasure the outside world with
00:23:43
displeasure with the previous indifference
00:23:46
the appearance of an object at the stage of primary
00:23:49
Nazism is formed 2 opposite
00:23:51
stupa hatred before that we had as
00:23:54
if I and everything
00:23:56
according to the falsity of love,
00:23:58
focus on oneself and
00:24:02
indifference, and when we have
00:24:04
an object, that is, according to their relationship with the outside
00:24:07
world,
00:24:08
respectively, everything that brings
00:24:10
pleasure, it becomes
00:24:12
infected, yes and but, as it were, that is, I,
00:24:15
accordingly, what is not me but bad,
00:24:17
let’s write down everything that is in me this is
00:24:21
something bad but it
00:24:26
can cause heard at the beginning the object is transferred
00:24:28
from the external world by the drives of
00:24:30
self-preservation and one cannot but agree
00:24:33
that the original meaning of hatred
00:24:35
means a relationship with an outsider, the
00:24:37
delivering one can live and
00:24:42
the indifference that arose first as the
00:24:45
forerunners of hatred constitutes the stimuli to the external world and antipathy
00:24:47
is a special case of an
00:24:49
external object hated at the very beginning
00:24:52
were identical if later the object
00:24:55
turns out to be a source of pleasure
00:24:56
becomes loved but at the same time
00:24:58
I joins therefore for the rectification of
00:25:01
Ravan into the enjoyer I the object
00:25:04
again coincides with being alien and hated
00:25:20
for this super polarity of pleasure and
00:25:22
displeasure quality
00:25:26
incomprehensible
00:25:29
sanyo
00:25:53
denial cashless
00:25:58
microphone turned off
00:26:01
another notification of the function of judgment
00:26:04
decisions about the real existence of the
00:26:07
inserted thing is a matter of the
00:26:10
finite real I who are knocked
00:26:13
out of the original enjoying the 8th
00:26:15
check of the series we are no
00:26:17
longer talking about whether it should, or rather
00:26:21
should or not, that the thing you accepted
00:26:24
should be accepted in I mean, something that
00:26:27
exists in the I as a representation can be
00:26:30
found again in the perception of reality,
00:26:33
as we see, this is again a question of external and
00:26:35
internal
00:26:36
unreal simply presented
00:26:39
subjective exists only inside the
00:26:41
other really exists also outside
00:26:44
such development taking into account the principle of
00:26:46
pleasure was pushed
00:26:49
aside experience learned what is important not
00:26:51
only do you have a thing objects of
00:26:53
vision with a good property,
00:26:55
does it deserve to be taken away from Ilya, but
00:26:59
it is not present in the external world
00:27:02
and therefore is it possible to take possession of an idea
00:27:05
if necessary, in order to understand this
00:27:09
development we need to remember that let's
00:27:12
establish
00:27:20
that is, the first question we had was okay
00:27:23
whether it’s bad tasty tasteless I don’t want it like that and
00:27:27
my role exists it’s not in reality
00:27:31
and here accordingly he already you come
00:27:34
just
00:27:35
real and real
00:27:42
the admission is not happening well, as if
00:27:47
I thought that just singing it’s
00:28:17
interesting by the way what’s in and
00:28:21
what’s subjective is simply presented
00:28:24
to name and unreal
00:28:27
and now I’m not interested in how
00:28:29
my relationship with myself changes,
00:28:32
and then I begin to accept the
00:28:34
unreal
00:28:36
content and begin to understand what are
00:28:38
really
00:28:40
ideal, that they are on fire, they are real and
00:28:43
that, for example, that I am
00:28:53
real, like now this is reality, well,
00:28:55
objective reality
00:28:57
[music ]
00:28:59
but forgive me, it seems to me that there must
00:29:02
be some kind of grandiose love spell, maybe
00:29:04
before this, initially the gender is the opposite, that
00:29:07
is, but as if on the contrary, the
00:29:09
dream of the question of reality is not posed, but
00:29:13
accordingly, by default, the content of
00:29:16
my ideas was to see
00:29:17
reality, well, yes, you get that it’s as
00:29:20
if the real world like us on earth
00:29:22
simply didn’t exist,
00:29:25
but accordingly, when
00:29:27
the idea of ​​the real world appears, there will be
00:29:29
therefore the sentence turns out that what is
00:29:31
inside me turns out to be unreal
00:29:35
the formulation is urgently interesting
00:29:41
1
00:29:42
yes it’s very interesting
00:30:05
and accordingly this reality can be
00:30:07
taken through
00:30:10
whether representation to be
00:30:13
found again in perception,
00:30:19
as it were, an important point again,
00:30:29
in order to understand this development, we need to
00:30:31
remember that all representations
00:30:33
come from perceptions are their
00:30:35
repetitions, how initially the
00:30:38
very existence of representation is a
00:30:41
guarantee of reality, I will imagine the
00:30:43
contradiction between the subjective and the
00:30:45
objective does not exist from the very beginning,
00:30:48
it arises only a consequence of the fact that
00:30:51
thinking has the ability to animate a
00:30:54
representation through
00:30:57
reproduction is that when it has been
00:30:59
perceived, although the object may no longer
00:31:02
exist in me,
00:31:03
therefore the first immediate goal of
00:31:06
testing reality is not to
00:31:08
find in real perception an object
00:31:10
corresponding to the represented one
00:31:13
in order to find it again make sure that it
00:31:16
still exists, another contribution to the
00:31:19
separation of the subjective and objective
00:31:21
comes from the other and the ability of
00:31:24
thinking,
00:31:25
the reproduction of perception, the representation
00:31:28
is not always its exact repetition,
00:31:31
it can be modified by omissions
00:31:34
of the name of us by the influence of various elements,
00:31:37
in which case reality testing must
00:31:39
control how far these go
00:31:42
distortions, at the same time, the conditions for
00:31:45
putting reality testing into effect
00:31:48
are recognizing that the objects that when
00:31:50
I brought them satisfaction from the
00:31:52
loss and
00:31:54
well, there are at least three
00:31:55
important things not bones, yes, I agree, let’s what
00:32:00
kind of transfer are important only,
00:32:04
well, probably what we are always dealing with a
00:32:08
strong psychic reality, they are
00:32:10
really the reality of
00:32:19
this at first, this is the gentleman,
00:32:28
well, then he talks about exactly the fact
00:32:32
that they are not in
00:32:36
order to find pliko in real perception
00:32:39
in order to find him again, as I
00:32:41
understand it, the fire is right, you are talking about the loss of the
00:32:44
primary of an object which will be like
00:32:50
setting a shortage and a
00:32:53
new object in its place
00:32:56
seems to me to be a principle, but this is again about
00:32:59
how to say the philosophical question of where
00:33:02
the perception of
00:33:04
reality as we come from and where we come from and 3
00:33:08
if it is only in our thinking whether it
00:33:11
has wheels that it is hidden on
00:33:14
at this level, these we have passed is not
00:33:17
specified, but in fact he says
00:33:18
because if we have some kind of
00:33:20
idea,
00:33:22
then it means that it corresponds to something in reality, it corresponds to
00:33:25
reaching 38 from somewhere before,
00:33:29
respectively,
00:33:30
passed reality and
00:33:33
psychic reality, this is not, well,
00:33:37
not the question is there, who knows where the
00:33:40
fantasies came from, let’s say the doctor has no
00:33:42
correspondence with the blue ones, that is, something
00:33:44
was originally real in any way, everything
00:33:47
that our head has, but
00:33:51
it is presented as it is in our country,
00:33:54
purely subjectively, it’s like this drink
00:33:56
thing-in-itself, so it’s
00:34:01
not effective in any way presented by
00:34:05
milfs thoughts that
00:34:08
there for example I see a pen
00:34:12
I will see it in one you see differently
00:34:15
take 3
00:34:22
or am I mistaken I understand something wrong
00:34:25
yes no I have
00:34:45
accordingly here we have a
00:34:47
reality check 1 the purpose of a reality check
00:34:50
is in order to again find this
00:34:53
representation in reality,
00:34:55
that is, to look at our
00:34:57
representation corresponding to something
00:35:14
because
00:35:16
Google is, as it were, on one side,
00:35:20
but we are actually talking about 2
00:35:23
abilities of our thinking, on the one
00:35:26
hand,
00:35:27
the ability to revive in the representation something that
00:35:31
was perceived somewhere there is
00:35:32
memory, yes, that
00:35:33
is, we have memory, so
00:35:36
our idea may not
00:35:38
correspond to anything in reality, and
00:35:40
this is the first function of checking
00:35:44
for reality, that what our
00:35:49
perception exists is only our
00:35:51
memory will still be in reality, and the second
00:35:54
point is that
00:35:57
our thinking is not always accurate
00:36:01
she repeats that it can modify that it is
00:36:02
modify the representation
00:36:05
accordingly on top of reality,
00:36:07
it controls quite how much
00:36:11
our representation
00:36:13
coincides with reality in the sense of
00:36:15
how much we have modified them,
00:36:18
distorted everything, mixed it up, or something
00:36:21
else,
00:36:24
and accordingly another cool
00:36:25
moment, it seems to me that a
00:36:27
condition for introducing
00:36:29
reality testing it is recognized that
00:36:31
objects that once brought
00:36:33
real satisfaction are lost,
00:36:38
that is, while we all do not address their reality, that
00:36:49
is, in short, as long as we have an
00:36:51
object of satisfaction, it does not matter to us whether it
00:36:54
corresponds to something in reality, does not
00:36:55
correspond to something of influence, then there
00:36:57
is, in order to address reality, we
00:36:59
need the object to be lost, it
00:37:02
seems to me the classic,
00:37:26
respectively, if we
00:37:28
summarize the last two paragraphs a little,
00:37:30
here we have the function of judgment
00:37:34
to which to speak, firstly,
00:37:38
it turns out that a
00:37:43
good thing is not bad
00:37:48
it is in reality people exist
00:37:57
I stitch on some game if you got into these
00:37:59
fantasies
00:38:03
vodka there is also right here an object
00:38:06
that needs to be found for but this is the mother’s
00:38:08
breast what is it like finding an object
00:38:11
goodies turned it well
00:38:19
yes about castration as I understand it and even then
00:38:21
since spring
00:38:24
I apologize for the noise
00:38:38
how can you tell me about castration dad
00:38:41
then tell me svirid
00:38:50
well and even then if we are
00:38:53
well like for example it’s good if this
00:38:56
object is the mother’s breast if we before
00:38:59
the order the situation happened we lost
00:39:01
this group on the mental representation we
00:39:03
are trying to find this place but you are right
00:39:08
it gives here this is a constant movement,
00:39:11
you can’t lose her,
00:39:16
well, it would be good, but there is no, for
00:39:19
example, a forty-year-old guy who
00:39:22
still doesn’t suckle the breast, well, as if not for
00:39:26
everyone, but as I understand it,
00:39:28
well, it’s represented mentally, let’s
00:39:31
then not let this happen,
00:39:36
or is she always
00:39:39
4 in At this point, I’m confused whether it’s always
00:39:42
represented in the mental, what but about
00:39:47
and whether this is the
00:39:48
loss of the primary object that always happens,
00:39:51
well, there may be no autists, well,
00:39:55
that is, again, the loss of the object
00:40:00
is a condition for the fact that we turn
00:40:03
to reality,
00:40:05
that is, to generally
00:40:07
question the reality needs the loss of an
00:40:09
object,
00:40:12
that is, if we seem to have an object before a
00:40:15
conditional one, but again a conditional object
00:40:17
because if we have an object there is no
00:40:20
question of reality there and this object is, as
00:40:22
it were, projected onto it, yes, we don’t have an
00:40:24
object from the teachings,
00:40:26
we don’t ask the question of reality that
00:40:29
is, we are not interested in what is outside, we have
00:40:30
such a wide range,
00:40:33
this is how autistic subjects, as I
00:40:35
understand it, yes they have,
00:40:37
well, the rest should be with neurotics more
00:40:40
clear with psycho glasses pervert ami, well,
00:40:43
no one and only no, well, if they have
00:40:46
the principle of reality, then they have there is a
00:40:48
marriage object
00:40:50
Novakovsky there is an object up to
00:40:58
psychotic and sometimes
00:41:00
there is no principle of reality but 030
00:41:04
but again it seems to me that this is some kind of
00:41:07
secondary question, well, how to
00:41:10
give a rejection of reality, at least this
00:41:13
suggests that it has become so
00:41:16
unbearable in reality Yes, what did
00:41:19
we look like there and took away from her
00:41:23
when it turns out it’s dismantling
00:41:25
secondary narcissism,
00:41:28
which means it’s primary then it
00:41:31
develops about this
00:41:38
further we go let’s
00:41:41
judge this is an intellectual act
00:41:44
thanks to which the decision to
00:41:47
choose a motor is removed, otherwise it stops the
00:41:51
delay created by thinking and
00:41:53
translates thinking into action about the
00:41:57
delay created by thinking I and also
00:41:59
he spoke the mind is
00:42:05
it should be considered as a trial
00:42:08
action motor probed they with it at
00:42:11
significant costs allotted n.s.
00:42:14
let us remember where I undertook such
00:42:17
probing in clothes, where
00:42:19
the technique was mastered, which is now used in
00:42:21
the processes of thinking; this happened at the
00:42:24
sensory end of the mental apparatus
00:42:27
when perceiving with the help of the senses;
00:42:30
because, according to our hypothesis, perception
00:42:33
is not a purely passive process; I
00:42:36
periodically send small
00:42:37
amounts of cathexis into the system
00:42:39
perceptions
00:42:40
through which it tastes
00:42:43
external stimuli so that after rolling
00:42:46
such a resonating mating it will retreat back
00:42:50
to you, that is,
00:42:57
we have thinking
00:43:00
that gives us a certain delay and
00:43:02
judgment is the intellectual act
00:43:05
that
00:43:07
completes this delay and makes a
00:43:10
decision on the choice of motor and even
00:43:14
brings thinking into action
00:43:19
by the way, dark osmanovich later polski
00:43:41
probing
00:43:44
how the residents of
00:43:49
the association are tasting,
00:43:52
it seems he, in principle, also has it
00:43:55
associatively, that he often writes about
00:43:57
all sorts of important things, but glasses and always the body
00:43:59
that a primitive creature
00:44:02
exercises the rights of reality, well,
00:44:05
in fact, this can be said about what we are talking about
00:44:07
because well, initially
00:44:10
it’s like an outer shell, she
00:44:14
says a
00:44:16
word, you’ll see the whole chapter,
00:44:19
but how does it become such a
00:44:24
shell, then it begins with it,
00:44:29
sense organs appear that
00:44:32
perceive exactly a specific
00:44:34
part of the external world, and if there was already
00:44:38
approximately the same speech goes on another
00:44:40
level,
00:44:42
that is, the time means that perception is both
00:44:46
convenient and action, but here it’s exactly the same as
00:44:47
condemnation, but there was also thinking. this is a
00:44:51
trial action,
00:44:53
probing, that is, we could
00:44:56
just go ahead every time, yes, but if we
00:44:59
first think there and with 5 less
00:45:02
energy then select the desired motor
00:45:05
act,
00:45:19
but accordingly, yes, just like
00:45:21
perception, the
00:45:25
same trial act requires exactly the
00:45:27
expenditure of energy to the point of being unbearable the process is
00:45:30
exactly the same as judgment or thinking, it is
00:45:33
also such an expenditure of energy, but less than
00:45:37
there is directly dreary action
00:45:44
means calculated that you think easier than the
00:45:46
tankers
00:46:00
killed, are there any
00:46:03
other children
00:46:08
there?
00:46:24
the impulse of the shoulders
00:46:27
by judgment represents the
00:46:29
expediency and further development of
00:46:31
the inclusion in the self of the originally followed
00:46:35
principle of pleasure or the pushing out
00:46:37
of the self
00:46:40
its polarity apparently
00:46:42
corresponds to the opposition of the two
00:46:44
groups of drives we assume the
00:46:58
negativism of some psychotics
00:47:00
should probably be understood as a sign of
00:47:03
stratification of the drive to quote the withdrawal of
00:47:05
venous components, but the fulfillment of the function
00:47:09
of judgment becomes possible only
00:47:11
due to the fact that the creation of a symbol
00:47:14
by negation allowed our corruption to
00:47:17
gain the first degree of independence
00:47:20
from the results of repression and at the same time
00:47:23
also blamed this on the pleasure principle.
00:47:31
the proposal is not very clear that
00:47:33
in general contentment to deny the
00:47:34
negativism of some psychotic of
00:47:36
should probably be understood as a sign of
00:47:38
stratification in treatment as a result of they
00:47:40
achieving the image of different components
00:47:46
but a destructive attraction yes but in my
00:47:50
opinion I will go in principle usually such
00:47:56
treatment is
00:47:58
practically by including they act
00:48:00
together
00:48:02
destructive the attraction of the movement of death is
00:48:04
correct but destructive in principle in
00:48:07
the broad sense of it, destructive
00:48:10
that is, but again with clouds if left
00:48:12
overboard, here we have, as it were,
00:48:14
destructive accusations with everyone, and
00:48:17
if this is an attraction that is an
00:48:19
instinctive attraction, then it is but campo
00:48:22
it is also connected with pleasure sort of,
00:48:28
that is, general pleasure from denial
00:48:32
can be understood as a sign of stratification
00:48:34
of drives, that is, does the kind of destructive drive go away from us? The
00:48:39
student remains, accordingly, and doesn’t know, goes away
00:48:42
in children, for example, it’s
00:48:45
anyone there to destroy that he loves very
00:48:48
much, yes, this, you can say
00:48:51
that this is for sure it’s dark and the reason
00:48:53
is why denial denial of
00:48:56
destructive treatments that I can’t
00:48:58
connect this I kind of
00:48:59
understand the falsity of the Apchi how it connects they couldn’t,
00:49:11
but the previous couple of sentences
00:49:15
on this judgment represents its well, in
00:49:17
short, where to carry the work the judgment
00:49:21
occurs and gives us the opportunity to
00:49:24
trace the origin of
00:49:26
intellectual functions from the
00:49:27
interaction of habitual impulses of
00:49:29
treatment, so we now move on to her
00:49:31
fascination
00:49:40
polarity of thought polarity of judgment
00:49:43
means yes no
00:49:45
descriptions corresponds to the opposition of the
00:49:49
two probably supposed groups of
00:49:50
treatments
00:49:51
again
00:49:53
growth on then with this is what is good this I
00:49:58
this unity
00:49:59
thanatos this is destructive yes this is not this is
00:50:02
bad and I will break it down,
00:50:04
and accordingly, we have
00:50:06
the pleasure of getting to the point of not just
00:50:08
effective training, we also have this,
00:50:12
but the transition is really interesting,
00:50:14
by the way, from the fact that first we have
00:50:16
a simple one and
00:50:18
this is what we understand and then a swoop like this,
00:50:49
so send
00:50:54
it this last sentence is what
00:50:57
exactly, if we add this part and
00:50:59
the particle is not there,
00:51:02
then the
00:51:04
repressed yes can break through
00:51:08
from the outside
00:51:11
is possible only due to the fact that the
00:51:14
creation of a symbol of negation is allowed
00:51:16
thinking of almost 1 degree of dependence,
00:51:19
opinion, at the same time, also tickets from
00:51:21
buttons,
00:51:37
on the one hand we have an attraction
00:51:39
which are involved in this judgment in
00:51:43
any case, that is, if for some reason
00:51:45
we say yes, it means something pleasant,
00:51:47
if we say no, then the destructive
00:51:51
drive can also be involved in this,
00:51:53
and denial also
00:51:55
gives us pleasure,
00:51:57
but on the other hand, again, fulfilling
00:52:01
the function the judgment becomes possible
00:52:05
due to the fact that the state of description
00:52:09
allowed thinking to acquire independent 1
00:52:12
glass of dependence on the results with them
00:52:14
in the sense of, in principle, introducing some kind of
00:52:16
unpleasant idea,
00:52:19
but it is interesting then that is, first we have
00:52:21
this intellectual
00:52:22
function and then a destructive
00:52:25
attraction either to or
00:52:31
or at the same time this
00:52:34
intellectual function appears that
00:52:36
allows us to enter that this is the perception of
00:52:39
something unpleasant
00:52:40
and at this moment we
00:52:42
really have teachings.
00:53:09
Well, here we probably also need to think about
00:53:12
bride courses,
00:53:15
this is denial dear klein
00:53:29
but
00:53:30
I don’t seem to be very melanie klein maybe you can
00:53:33
tell
00:53:35
me this is so pure
00:53:39
bad breasts this is
00:53:41
first of all a leg for someone,
00:53:44
in short, I wanted to say that if
00:53:46
there are bad breasts then this is already well,
00:53:48
as if in fact, jumping is already
00:53:51
the moment when we already have the
00:53:54
opportunity
00:53:56
to introduce unpleasant
00:53:59
[ music]
00:54:00
representation
00:54:02
means we should already have an idea, there should
00:54:06
already
00:54:08
be a possibility of creating a simulation of
00:54:10
negation,
00:54:12
that is, it seems to me that this nonsense is some
00:54:14
interesting point, that for the manufacturer the
00:54:17
actual function it precedes,
00:54:20
not that now it is a condition for
00:54:23
the emergence of the image of purchase 2, well, yes
00:54:26
you get if,
00:54:28
well, in order to say good you need a
00:54:31
judgment of
00:54:33
condemnation for the intellectual function of
00:54:35
that side and the ball from here we have we
00:54:38
have condemnation we have repression
00:54:44
that is, if we are talking about
00:54:45
the unconscious we have here and this is the
00:54:48
intellectual point we have
00:54:49
repression good and what and how do we know
00:54:52
what to repress?
00:54:56
Further, we are
00:54:57
not just talking about knowledge,
00:54:59
consciousness, but yes, well, that is, if we
00:55:03
repress something, then we do it
00:55:05
unconsciously; the
00:55:07
function is exactly what allows us to
00:55:09
carry on with me,
00:55:10
so we may have bad breasts
00:55:12
without negation,
00:55:15
essentially
00:55:19
effective, that is,
00:55:22
they screwed it up
00:55:23
[laughter]
00:55:27
and the value of this salvation, taken
00:55:31
with such an understanding of negation, is quite
00:55:34
consistent with the fact
00:55:35
that during analysis we do not find the no
00:55:38
unconscious and that the recognition
00:55:41
of the unconscious on the part of the I is expressed
00:55:43
in negative formulations there is no more
00:55:46
compelling evidence of success after all
00:55:47
unconscious than the reaction to
00:55:49
it the person being analyzed sees
00:55:54
himself in the analysis for me
00:55:57
it never went well
00:56:11
because he understands in the end we don’t find it does
00:56:13
n’t achieve means
00:56:20
no no everything everything well, like
00:56:26
if you’re at the bottom then but you won’t know
00:56:29
but why is it like that if the symbol would also
00:56:42
blow somehow I don’t know and in my opinion with
00:56:44
what kind of robot from the unconscious, yes, here
00:56:45
we are and how we read it in the first year then
00:56:48
before writing the first works, well, something like that
00:56:50
a priori and realized that but did they write
00:56:52
to me it’s of no use no
00:56:56
good image of a
00:57:00
diesel engine why no unconsciously no
00:57:04
poison essentially we are talking about
00:57:07
well the meaning of this entire article, that is,
00:57:10
denial is an
00:57:12
operator of some kind who is already using
00:57:14
consciousness to introduce some idea before
00:57:17
denying it, that is, in
00:57:21
the unconscious there is the content of the idea but
00:57:24
this is also somehow a lot this is not my
00:57:25
mother my mother she is already there
00:57:28
unconsciously yes that is, as if
00:57:29
denial no unconscious because
00:57:31
denial this well as if something yes that is
00:57:33
we cannot be
00:57:37
because you know more it consists of this
00:57:39
these ideas inside so far 83
00:57:45
here's how to give and how to give pictures everything and
00:57:47
then we have 3 about further
00:57:50
this option we don't find no
00:57:52
unconscious and then comes the recognition
00:57:55
of the unconscious from the outside I are
00:57:56
expressed in negative formulations
00:58:13
and
00:58:28
what's this footnote here propaganda
00:58:31
Christmas was there I don’t remember almost
00:58:33
all the sweets Konstantin back in the
00:58:35
twenty-third year the note was
00:58:37
added added 7 hours goro but I don’t
00:58:39
immediately remember what kind of note there is
00:58:42
on 23
00:58:47
but in principle this is the idea why we don’t
00:58:50
find food unconscious recognition
00:58:52
unconscious from the side I express myself in a
00:58:53
negative way,
00:59:11
hello,
00:59:13
probably because it was something
00:59:16
moaning, not a pleasant languor, it was repressed, it seems to be
00:59:19
there,
00:59:21
but
00:59:26
we repressed it and do not indulge, it
00:59:30
seems to us that it does not exist, so when
00:59:33
we project this consciousness, we seem to
00:59:37
deny it, that is, it it’s not about us it’s
00:59:40
a little bit not about this gene of sharper
00:59:44
proof of
00:59:46
luck reaction repair of this I didn’t think
00:59:52
recognition unconsciously
00:59:56
then it means I didn’t understand what the question was about,
01:00:00
principle and the meaning of the latter is obligatory
01:00:23
and what can you say
01:00:35
[music]
01:00:39
well, maybe it makes sense that
01:00:41
when I’m saying that I didn’t think about it,
01:00:48
but no matter how consciously you can’t admit it,
01:00:52
but it’s there somewhere, but you can’t, I can’t
01:01:00
bones, you’re the simplest instead of purely
01:01:02
Czechs, it
01:01:04
seems to me that this is the simplest instead of
01:01:06
Russian articles, in principle,
01:01:20
you’re like this is exactly what is going on this is exactly this
01:01:22
a3 denial about which I talked about the whole
01:01:24
article
01:01:27
that
01:01:31
but how he starts this that this is not my
01:01:33
mother this is the same thing that I didn’t
01:01:35
think of this from the same series
01:01:41
but look it’s important time that you are in
01:01:44
the analysis that you often fly out that I
01:01:46
never thought about this, this is denial, the
01:02:09
difference between the unconscious, more precisely
01:02:13
between and but then it would be I
01:02:16
never thought about it, that is, but as if I was
01:02:19
just an organized part of our
01:02:23
psyche before which I never
01:02:25
thought about it in the sense that I never I didn’t
01:02:27
introduce this content until the process was brought together with
01:02:30
these, but unconsciously there, well, yes,
01:02:33
I
01:02:35
thought, well, yes,
01:02:38
well, recognition unconsciously
01:02:41
seems to me that analytical work is, in
01:02:44
principle, excluded
01:02:46
when a person is like that,
01:03:04
so what if someone doesn’t want to, for example,
01:03:07
now somehow
01:03:08
summarize the text,
01:03:28
well saturating the text with something purer than
01:03:31
good, it
01:03:35
seems to me that the speech of something is that we
01:03:38
have, as it were, the principle of pleasure, the principle of
01:03:41
reality, we have a simple action
01:03:44
of repression when we simply don’t have it,
01:03:47
and the principle of reality, which forces
01:03:49
us to deal with what we
01:03:53
put aside with the principle of reality
01:03:56
the principle of pleasure and with
01:04:00
walking in the imagination of some things
01:04:02
that may be unpleasant for us, but
01:04:05
in order to somehow cope with these things
01:04:06
we use this operator not before or
01:04:10
negation, which allows us to
01:04:13
smoothly move from
01:04:15
pleasure to the principle of reality and
01:04:17
something to
01:04:18
continue the principle of reality to subordinate the
01:04:20
principle to pleasure is a poor quality
01:04:21
sign, therefore,
01:04:25
but on the other hand, what I’m saying is
01:04:27
some kind of specific thing, it seems to me from
01:04:30
the text, no,
01:04:35
that is, because we are displacing our
01:04:37
thinking process, it is very impoverished, as
01:04:40
if it turns out to be a
01:04:46
logical operator, this is what for the first time
01:04:48
allows us to think about things yes, well,
01:04:53
again,
01:04:57
well, just like this, the fuse was still very
01:05:00
full, this is the loss
01:05:03
of the object, well,
01:05:09
and this is exactly
01:05:10
where
01:05:12
it was about the intellectual function,
01:05:20
but the industry of the intellectual function,
01:05:25
this is even
01:05:27
interesting, a judgment is an intellectual
01:05:30
act, thanks to which the
01:05:32
choice of a motor act that
01:05:34
decides is understood deferment of what is created by thinking and
01:05:36
38 that not all and
01:05:51
but I don’t know me, for example, a little
01:05:53
thought arises to the side about
01:05:58
different
01:05:59
cultural ones, to say
01:06:03
the world in the worldview, that is, these are Western
01:06:06
actions of a person and the Eastern idea of ​​a
01:06:10
person you contemplate, but it
01:06:13
seems to me that in principle it is not interesting
01:06:15
how to conduct
01:06:20
but to build this in the context of the principle of
01:06:23
pleasure in the principle of reality
01:06:29
but these signatures
01:06:33
i.e.
01:06:50
that is, but
01:06:51
now I mean that judgment, yes, this is
01:06:56
again an intellectual act
01:06:57
that
01:06:58
completes our thinking and leads to the
01:07:04
transition to action, and if in Eastern
01:07:08
Eastern practices we reach such
01:07:11
thinking and even such a judgment that
01:07:14
tells us that by and large account
01:07:17
our our idea of ​​the object and the
01:07:22
desires and needs
01:07:25
they are as false further in fact
01:07:28
today we are in the
01:07:31
west which allows us to
01:07:34
continue to maintain an indifferent
01:07:35
attitude towards reality
01:07:37
apparently Freddy the
01:07:41
European subject hairstyle it is interesting to
01:07:45
trace
01:07:48
different worldviews like this
01:07:56
but what if but no one no
01:07:58
more comments there can
01:08:00
this be well
01:08:03
I don’t have
01:08:12
in a week what are you talking about in a
01:08:15
week
01:08:16
the question about village analysis and now
01:08:19
if you give me a second I’ll look at
01:08:21
the schedule
01:08:23
so
01:08:24
today 17
01:08:28
to 25 for the question of British analysis
01:08:32
okay then see you
01:08:36
very much goodbye thank you

Description:

Подать заявку на основные программы обучения в ВЕИП: https://eeip.ru/abit.html Подать заявку на очные и он-лайн курсы повышения квалификации ВЕИП: https://nic-eeip.ru/ Дистанционное обучение ВЕИП: https://veip.org/ Он-лайн журнал Psy.Media: https://psy.media/ Регистрация на День Открытых Дверей: https://eeip.ru/obrazovanie/dod/ группа ВК (курсы и до.образование): https://vk.com/do.veip YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/EeipRu Facebook (ВЕИП): https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Facebook (Дети Зигмунда Фрейда): https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Группа ВК (Дети Зигмунда Фрейда): https://vk.com/institute_of_psychoanalysis Паблик ВК (Психоанализ тринадцати друзей Фрейда): http://vk.com/eeipru Twitter: https://twitter.com/eeipru Instagram: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Семинар "Отрицание" (группа 3) Кобелева О.И. (18.02.22)"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.