background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE"

input logo icon
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Introduction
4:05
Les 'Brazil files' et la liberté d'expression
6:06
Achat de Twitter par Elon Musk et censure au Brésil
11:00
Alexandre de Moraes et la politique brésilienne
17:20
Mécanismes de censure et implications mondiales
25:05
Entretien avec Jean-Pierre Petit
46:00
Rejet académique du modèle Janus
47:00
Diffamation scientifique
52:00
Conférences et réception du public
56:08
Soutien et impact des travaux de Petit
1:05:01
Début dans la MHD
1:07:04
Reconnaissance et obstacles
1:08:01
Innovations et interférences militaires
1:12:01
Difficultés de publication et reconnaissance internationale
1:15:00
Évolution de la diffusion scientifique
1:20:01
Cosmologie et erreurs conceptuelles
1:27:21
L'impact de la langue sur la science
1:30:01
Les défis de la publication scientifique
1:35:01
La nécessité d'innovation en science
1:48:51
Les difficultés académiques
1:55:01
La crise de la physique
2:00:02
La topologie et la science
2:11:34
Le besoin de changement scientifique
2:16:00
Les défis de la publication scientifique
2:21:02
La recherche hors de France
2:27:00
Soutenir Jean-Pierre Petit
2:31:37
L'histoire de la science et du fanatisme
2:33:05
La sélection des élites et le conformisme
2:37:00
Les défis de la publication scientifique
2:45:00
La marginalisation et la politique scientifique
2:51:30
Censure et perte de documents
2:53:00
Diffusion du savoir
2:55:00
Anecdotes personnelles
3:00:00
Expériences internationales
3:06:00
Obstacles académiques
3:08:00
Réflexions sur la religion et la politique
3:13:20
Conflits géopolitiques actuels
3:16:00
Diplomatie et guerres
3:19:00
Armes et conflits
3:24:07
Impact de la guerre sur la société
3:31:13
Accusations de corruption
3:32:20
Réaction à la trahison
3:33:01
Conclusion
Video tags
|

Video tags

modèle janus
jean-pierre petit
science
cosmologie
physique
astrophysique
espace
big bang
vulgarisation scientifique
corruption
cern
géopolitique profonde
étienne klein
thibault damour
janus
physique quantique
russie
ukraine
MHD
hicham zejli
einstein
histoire
prix nobel
censure
matière noire
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:00
your Sunday appointment so this
00:00:02
evening we will have a prestigious guest I
00:00:04
will have the honor of being able
00:00:05
speak with Jean-Pierre Petit who
00:00:08
will be there at 8:30 p.m. in barely 30
00:00:09
minutes but first of all I would also have
00:00:12
the pleasure therefore of welcoming
00:00:13
unlike last week we have
00:00:14
had a lot of technical problems I
00:00:16
brings back Antoine Bachelin Senna
00:00:18
to talk about important news
00:00:20
around so the Brazil files we go
00:00:22
being able to do that is quite a
00:00:23
chronicle this will be the first part of
00:00:25
this show next so there will be
00:00:26
Jean-Pierre Peet the big interview
00:00:30
all evening and then there will be
00:00:32
Jean-Maxime cornet who will join us
00:00:34
after our discussion with Jean-Pierre
00:00:36
So here it is, uh it's going to be one
00:00:39
excellent evening really very
00:00:40
interesting and above all important being
00:00:42
given the news of Jean-Pierre
00:00:43
Little one will talk about his work but
00:00:44
especially in fact of the persecutions that he
00:00:46
suffered from the community
00:00:48
scientist with a total rju of his
00:00:49
work an impossibility of publishing it
00:00:52
there are a lot of things there are a lot
00:00:54
things to share about corruption
00:00:56
in this environment and he will also need
00:00:58
both your attention and and also
00:01:00
of your support in different forms
00:01:02
but he will be able to explain all that but
00:01:04
before that the column with Antoine
00:01:05
Bachelor Sena but especially the
00:01:12
[Music]
00:01:21
generic we are at war
00:01:26
[Music]
00:01:34
[Applause]
00:01:35
[Music]
00:01:42
[Music]
00:01:50
ah you don't have to be afraid
00:01:54
[Music]
00:02:02
[Applause]
00:02:04
[Music]
00:02:08
and so as I said good evening everyone
00:02:10
and welcome to I small deep for
00:02:12
your Sunday evening appointment which
00:02:13
starts a little later than usual
00:02:15
the show will be a little shorter but
00:02:17
as you could see there will be
00:02:20
Jean-Pierre Petit who will be our guest
00:02:22
main and which arrives in barely 30
00:02:23
minutes he was in the studio right away
00:02:24
time to make adjustments
00:02:25
techniques given the problems of
00:02:27
last week we made sure that
00:02:28
everything can be perfectly fine
00:02:29
operate donation and before bringing
00:02:32
so Jean-Pierre Petit I I wanted
00:02:33
really bring Antoine back
00:02:35
Bachelin Sena who was present so the
00:02:37
last week for a column
00:02:38
important on a current subject
00:02:39
important but there were different
00:02:40
technical problems which prevented
00:02:42
keep the show so it seems to me
00:02:44
necessary to bring him back to
00:02:46
talk but that's it before you ask
00:02:49
all the question but where is Jean-Pierre
00:02:50
Little one, he'll be there in less than 25 minutes
00:02:53
but first of all good evening Antoine
00:02:57
how are you doggie
00:03:00
thank you for having me raphaë a pleasure
00:03:02
here to share what is happening at
00:03:04
Brazil and for the world too we will
00:03:07
explain it exactly so in any case
00:03:10
so if the image may have some
00:03:13
problems there normally the sound should
00:03:14
be good feel free to tell us in
00:03:15
the cat if the sound is good on your side
00:03:17
for the image it is normal that there is
00:03:19
some saturations but there normally
00:03:20
everything should be stable therefore in everything
00:03:21
cases before the arrival of Jean-Pierre Petit
00:03:23
there as I said seemed necessary
00:03:24
to be able to talk about this again
00:03:27
news which is very important for
00:03:29
talk about a country we don't know about
00:03:30
obviously there's a lot of interest in it
00:03:32
very little while he has a very
00:03:33
important on a geopolitical level
00:03:36
and so it is Brazil and the famous
00:03:39
affair of the Brazil files and therefore Antoine
00:03:42
I'm going to let you speak for this
00:03:43
chronic there uh given that the
00:03:46
last week there were a few who
00:03:48
I'm actually going to let you go again
00:03:50
zé actually redo a contextualization
00:03:52
total and above all we
00:03:54
explain what's new because
00:03:55
that you sent me a message for me
00:03:56
say there are still more things to say
00:03:58
so I'm going to let you speak and
00:04:00
its apparently perfect so Antoine
00:04:02
I'll let you speak, thank you very much
00:04:05
Raphael the American Congress shared
00:04:08
a document of more than 500 pages
00:04:11
confidential court documents and
00:04:13
this document is entitled open
00:04:16
quotes attack on freedom
00:04:18
of expression abroad and silence
00:04:21
of the Biden administration from point
00:04:24
case of
00:04:25
Brazil there will be four implications
00:04:30
linked to these Twitter files brzil then I
00:04:32
I'll explain the four
00:04:33
implications which will be the four
00:04:34
points of my development and then I
00:04:36
I will go into detail about what the
00:04:38
Twitter files
00:04:40
brasio the first point the violation of
00:04:43
judicial processes that the law
00:04:46
American does not allow for
00:04:47
American companies and does not let
00:04:49
pass the second point
00:04:52
legal repercussions
00:04:55
on Instagram WhatsApp also that they have
00:04:58
bought YouTube and the other others
00:05:00
platforms the third point one
00:05:02
interference by the FBI the CIA services
00:05:06
secrets the State Department Congress
00:05:09
American made a request to obtain the
00:05:12
emails exchanged between the State
00:05:13
United States Department and the Court
00:05:15
Brazilian Supreme Court regarding the
00:05:17
censors the 4th point the United States will
00:05:21
legislate very quickly before
00:05:24
elections this year we have the
00:05:26
Trump elections is a moment
00:05:28
crucial they will want to add
00:05:31
new protection mechanisms
00:05:33
freedom of expression they want
00:05:36
confidentiality of our data
00:05:38
personal on the Internet and more
00:05:39
integrity of the electoral process therefore
00:05:42
that's the point here is that it's useful
00:05:45
of inspiration and example for
00:05:47
deputies from other countries and that
00:05:49
citizens put pressure on their
00:05:52
members so this is what
00:05:55
introduction these Twitter false Blas are
00:05:58
extremely important and therefore the
00:05:59
four points of implication the four
00:06:02
points that we will detail here
00:06:04
so here I start Elon Musk
00:06:06
know this well he bought Twitter in
00:06:08
October 2022 was during the
00:06:11
Brazilian electoral campaigns he
00:06:14
access to all internal discussions
00:06:16
from Twitter to all requests for this
00:06:18
called the deep state and he has it
00:06:21
demonstrated already when he bought Twitter
00:06:23
that he had relayed during Twitter falses
00:06:26
already the case of Unter Biden's laptop and
00:06:29
how the deep state did it
00:06:31
pressure directly on the
00:06:33
Twitter officials so that it
00:06:35
censors well he does it again
00:06:38
regarding Brazil with its
00:06:39
Twitter son brzio brziio and therefore Elon
00:06:43
Musk with his questions he mentioned
00:06:46
also the fact that other companies
00:06:47
like my Instagram YouTube don't have
00:06:50
denounced what happened in Brazil
00:06:52
and actually in Brazil if you want had
00:06:53
illegal orders illegal orders
00:06:56
of the Supreme Court of orders which do not
00:06:58
do not respect the Constitution
00:07:00
Brazilian and Twitter just like
00:07:03
Facebook and YouTube must have do
00:07:06
must respond on the territory
00:07:07
American so as I explained to you
00:07:09
This is a very important point.
00:07:10
why the American Congress has a
00:07:13
investigation which is ongoing and they have
00:07:16
called Elon Musk to come testify on the 8th
00:07:21
May so May 8th will have Elon Musk who
00:07:23
will be received by the American Congress and
00:07:26
they will then decide on sanctions
00:07:28
They will then decide what
00:07:30
legislate so that was the 4th point they
00:07:33
want to legislate to add
00:07:35
new protection mechanisms
00:07:36
freedom of expression privacy
00:07:39
of our personal data which is a
00:07:41
point of concern in all
00:07:42
country and therefore you have to be very
00:07:44
attentive to be able to put pressure on
00:07:47
our deputies and see what will happen
00:07:49
and above all more process integrity
00:07:52
electoral sure so we will come back to the
00:07:55
case Elon Musk explained the fact that there
00:07:59
has a violation of judicial processes
00:08:01
that American law does not allow for
00:08:04
American companies and
00:08:05
asks why for example Zuckerberg
00:08:08
of my did not denounce what the Court
00:08:12
Brazilian supreme asked what
00:08:14
he obeyed their illegal orders
00:08:16
and other founders too eh
00:08:19
the Google team on Youtube
00:08:22
why they didn't denounce anything why
00:08:25
they obeyed the illegal orders of the
00:08:27
Brazilian Supreme Court and if this is
00:08:29
proven and therefore elon mus will be received on
00:08:33
May 8 before a special commission of
00:08:37
American Congress if this is proven it
00:08:39
will have
00:08:40
financial sanctions and and
00:08:43
also criminal, it's not civil eh
00:08:46
it's really a criminal offense
00:08:47
American territory against those who have
00:08:49
accepted illegal orders so twitter
00:08:52
didn't do that so Elon Musk did
00:08:55
insurgent against the illegal orders of the
00:08:57
Brazilian Supreme Court and began to
00:09:02
post on Twitter
00:09:04
by calling the person who runs the court
00:09:08
electoral superior here in Brazil and he
00:09:10
told him why you censor so much
00:09:11
so it attracted public attention
00:09:13
on the actions of this Supreme Court
00:09:15
Brazilian and this Supreme Court
00:09:17
Brazilian is in a censorship
00:09:20
terrible with a militia also which
00:09:22
imprison journalists and uh
00:09:25
deputy pasonalo so I will explain
00:09:27
these details and we have a huge amount of
00:09:31
political prisoners who are who have
00:09:34
been put in prison simply for having
00:09:37
express their opinion and so that is
00:09:39
denounced via these Twitter files arms because
00:09:42
that Elon Musk has
00:09:43
relayed the illegal demands which
00:09:46
were made by the director of
00:09:49
Brazilian Superior Electoral Court
00:09:50
Alan JIS and so elon mus exposed it he
00:09:55
showed via his documents and therefore the
00:09:57
American Congress took over 500 pages of
00:10:00
request and request for censorship with
00:10:03
the names of the journalists
00:10:05
MPs on which tweet they are accused
00:10:08
and he asked for fines
00:10:11
exorbitant eh and a delay also very
00:10:14
short to put pressure on the
00:10:17
Twitter Brazil officials for
00:10:19
withdraw in 2 hours and if he did not withdraw
00:10:22
in 2 hours the Twitter account uh of of of of
00:10:26
some people well they had
00:10:27
an extremely high fine and and it
00:10:29
did not have the right to detail the
00:10:33
files he had no right to
00:10:34
present an appeal he had to
00:10:36
following
00:10:37
remove it without any discussion and
00:10:40
he went even further
00:10:42
director of the Superior Court
00:10:43
electoral alexand jimis by threatening
00:10:47
Twitter officials Blesil
00:10:49
to go to prison if he did not obey
00:10:52
do you want
00:10:54
rebound I will develop the dice it is
00:10:57
especially especially in my opinion make a
00:10:58
reminder because you mentioned a name that
00:10:59
is still very important for
00:11:00
understanding politics in Brazil is
00:11:02
especially therefore Alexandre de Moraes
00:11:03
maybe you can clarify a little
00:11:04
little more who is this person who has
00:11:06
been his news because his name was
00:11:07
been widely cited especially during
00:11:09
elections in Brazil and after the
00:11:11
elections in Brazil there have been several
00:11:12
events which were quickly
00:11:14
deleted we will say of
00:11:17
the news so I'll just leave you
00:11:19
maybe give some details
00:11:21
more about this character who seems
00:11:23
still rather central in any case
00:11:24
very important to
00:11:26
know completely then the majority
00:11:29
of the Supreme Court was appointed by the
00:11:30
left Loula so that's a first
00:11:33
point already and they are the ones who censor
00:11:36
and who imprison journalists and
00:11:39
and deputies even then Alexander Jim
00:11:41
Moris he has
00:11:43
was he was he was the subject of attack
00:11:46
direct attack not denunciation
00:11:48
by Elon Musk on Twitter and Elon Musk
00:11:53
himself said that Alan Dimolas holds
00:11:57
leave it there he has Elon Musk has
00:12:00
directly said that Alexandre di Moris
00:12:02
Alexandre di Moris keeps Loula on a leash
00:12:06
so I will explain why and you
00:12:09
go see that there are stories
00:12:11
hacker stories
00:12:15
of in fact he he he holds I will you
00:12:18
explain all that right away
00:12:20
then the predecessor of Alexander
00:12:21
jimoray it was thorisavas who died
00:12:24
in a mysterious accident
00:12:26
plane after an investigation into
00:12:28
dozens of politicians for corruption
00:12:30
in 2017 in the kwash zavaski operation
00:12:33
had to rule on the legibility of
00:12:36
testimonials from 67 ude bcht leaders
00:12:39
it was a real estate company that made
00:12:41
condemn in particular many relatives
00:12:43
of Loula for corruption and therefore he
00:12:45
there was a plea negotiation where
00:12:47
there were a good number of personalities
00:12:49
the most powerful in Brazil and also
00:12:50
of its Latin American neighbors and that
00:12:53
it is the guard who therefore reports this
00:12:56
are media foreign media
00:13:00
which then report according to the Guardian
00:13:01
and other reports therefore
00:13:03
flight records suggest
00:13:05
that there was no malfunction of
00:13:06
equipment communication with the
00:13:07
pilot does not indicate any difficulty and
00:13:10
alexand di Moris precisely this director
00:13:12
of the Superior Electoral Court which is
00:13:14
pinned in this censorship with Elon
00:13:16
Musk well he was named replacement
00:13:18
of zavaski by president temer therefore
00:13:20
temer is the one that assumed it afterwards
00:13:23
dilmousev it was dilmousev's vice
00:13:25
who experienced impeachment for
00:13:27
corruption and uh
00:13:29
so he was named by tem while he
00:13:32
was Minister of Justice and
00:13:34
Public Security but that is the
00:13:36
very important point you go
00:13:39
see there
00:13:41
has
00:13:45
to sing the mayor with
00:13:49
of the
00:13:55
and and
00:14:01
he really has
00:14:04
thatour'i
00:14:06
Brazilian
00:14:08
explain I will continue then
00:14:10
father you want to bounce back no I I you
00:14:12
lets continue very well and so we have
00:14:15
had left-wing journalists
00:14:17
Twitter Fals arms what is really
00:14:19
interesting is that these are
00:14:21
journalists
00:14:25
it's an amsonage operation in TER
00:14:29
of communication the Mia mainstream have
00:14:32
were obliged to relay these facts
00:14:35
Mia mainstream were forced to
00:14:37
relay the fact that there was this
00:14:41
this huge censorship so I'm going to
00:14:43
will detail
00:14:44
also documents that are 500 pages
00:14:47
which are relayed by the Congress
00:14:49
American and therefore these documents are
00:14:51
linked to demands for censorship on Twitter
00:14:53
and shows that the Supreme Court
00:14:56
Brazilian demanded a ban or
00:14:59
permanent blocking of more than 150
00:15:02
policy profiles and
00:15:04
journalists confidentially
00:15:07
without explanation provided any
00:15:09
possibility of appealing
00:15:10
different network platforms
00:15:12
social then there we have what has been called a
00:15:15
system and this is where it is necessary
00:15:17
be careful in other countries because
00:15:19
that we have the most advanced system of
00:15:22
industrial censorship complex it'sorté
00:15:26
by journalist Michael Schellenberg
00:15:28
because it is an industrial complex
00:15:30
censorship due to its extensive structure
00:15:33
and which is located in the system
00:15:35
judicial in Brazil it is not in the
00:15:37
system
00:15:38
executive with the State Department or
00:15:42
or in Europe in the Commission
00:15:44
European no it's a it's a system
00:15:45
different by the judiciary and therefore this
00:15:47
censorship system to do a little
00:15:49
history and that's where it's needed
00:15:51
be careful it was created by
00:15:53
government officials of
00:15:55
USA and England more
00:15:57
especially those who work
00:15:58
for activists and agencies
00:16:00
information and in a more advanced way
00:16:02
that before it was developed in 2017 so
00:16:04
THE
00:16:06
work
00:16:08
that the old and new agents of the
00:16:12
United States State Department CIA
00:16:15
the FBI and also the Department of
00:16:18
British Defense have developed
00:16:20
extensive programs
00:16:25
censorship of science we finance the
00:16:28
creation of censorship tool with
00:16:31
artificial intelligence for
00:16:32
Facebook Instagram Twitter and others
00:16:35
social media platforms for
00:16:36
develop mass censorship therefore
00:16:38
early 2017 already does a lot
00:16:41
military service agencies
00:16:42
of intelligence of the agents of
00:16:45
United States governments develop
00:16:46
the same censorship tactics as the
00:16:49
higher electoral court used
00:16:51
then c four points four points
00:16:55
precisely to show this
00:16:56
first point to report as
00:16:59
information categorized denigrated isolated
00:17:03
controversial controversy et cetera
00:17:06
journalist and popular politician
00:17:08
right the second point put on the
00:17:10
in front of the
00:17:13
scene put on the front of the
00:17:17
scene apparently I'll let you continue
00:17:20
so in fact as you have a lot of
00:17:22
cuts in fact uh at the level therefore of
00:17:25
of the connection I'm going to ask you to
00:17:27
actually make it a little bit shorter I
00:17:28
will start the interview with jean-Pier
00:17:30
rained a little bit earlier uh because
00:17:31
that apparently there are quite a few
00:17:33
sound cuts so I'll leave you
00:17:35
continue and we and go the most
00:17:38
quickly possible to the news
00:17:40
information about Brazil files very
00:17:42
well I removed the camera maybe that
00:17:44
will be a little better then so they
00:17:46
use in a third point no already
00:17:48
in a second point they put on the
00:17:50
front of the stage of the so-called
00:17:51
specialists and we notice this in
00:17:53
the whole world eh so it's happening
00:17:55
all over the world it's really very
00:17:56
important in the second point he m on
00:17:59
the center stage of the so-called
00:18:00
government specialists or
00:18:02
funded by the government or
00:18:04
directly from intelligence units
00:18:06
and spying on this in order to collect
00:18:09
evidence on those uh on those who
00:18:15
are previously labeled which have been
00:18:17
previously labeled the third point
00:18:20
it's using so-called third parties
00:18:22
influencers to demand
00:18:23
changes to terms of service
00:18:25
to put pressure on him
00:18:30
boycott them who allow
00:18:33
freedom of expression and this
00:18:34
worked particularly well on
00:18:35
Facebook and Instagram therefore the court
00:18:38
electoral superior is in Brazil and it has
00:18:39
been proven with his Twitter Fals brasur
00:18:42
he piloted the draconian measures
00:18:44
Brazil with many of these searches
00:18:46
and methods of pressure to censor
00:18:49
Brazil and some journalists have
00:18:51
shown that this action was
00:18:53
funded by government agencies
00:18:55
from the United States that's why it
00:18:57
was taken up by the American Congress and
00:19:00
in particular the model of the Tribunal
00:19:01
Brazilian electoral superior he reflects
00:19:04
a public private partnership model
00:19:06
which uses small groups to
00:19:08
censor the government and therefore
00:19:10
the US congressional document cites
00:19:13
also the action of organizations
00:19:15
the most influential censorship we have uh
00:19:16
the Aspen Institute the Observatory
00:19:19
of the Internet and Stanford they have
00:19:21
censored since covid-19 since
00:19:24
2020 elections and so we see it
00:19:27
directly with his Twitter FAL Blas
00:19:29
which were uh shown by Elon Musk
00:19:32
who bought between the 1st and 2nd round
00:19:34
Brazilian elections uh he he
00:19:37
shows precisely this interference and
00:19:39
this pressure from agencies
00:19:41
government in partnership with
00:19:43
the superior electoral court
00:19:45
superior electoral court itself
00:19:47
cites for example the final document of the
00:19:49
Election Integrity Partnership
00:19:51
Stanford who has who has publicly
00:19:53
defended point of view censorship
00:19:55
conservative politics of congressmen
00:19:58
even we have for example René douesta who
00:20:00
is a former CIA officer who is
00:20:02
behind the integrity project
00:20:04
Brazilian election called
00:20:06
Graphica with the letter pH gr a P h I c
00:20:10
so that's a partner
00:20:12
strategic of the Superior Court
00:20:14
election and the New York Times itself
00:20:17
which is a newspaper which is not at all
00:20:18
pro bolsonaro on the contrary he declared
00:20:22
that the pointer Institute therefore which one
00:20:24
which certifies if you want all
00:20:26
fact cheakers it was created to do
00:20:28
openly what the CIA was doing
00:20:31
for decades and therefore
00:20:33
uh it's an American company
00:20:36
Twitter which must comply with the laws of
00:20:39
United States even though it operates in
00:20:41
other countries she is obliged to
00:20:43
respect the laws of other countries and it
00:20:45
cannot carry out illegal action and
00:20:47
therefore the local superior court
00:20:49
request to carry out illegal actions
00:20:51
and that's criminal it's not it's not
00:20:53
civil and so uh it's it's something
00:20:56
something that can lead to prison and
00:20:57
that's why I approached them
00:20:58
four main points at the start that
00:21:00
I will repeat again we have a
00:21:02
violation of legal processes that
00:21:04
American law does not allow for
00:21:05
American companies and will not
00:21:07
let it pass, that's why
00:21:09
American Congress will receive Elon Musk
00:21:11
on May 8 he will testify in a
00:21:13
second point we have the repercussions
00:21:15
legal for other companies
00:21:17
Youtube Facebook Instagram WhatsApp
00:21:19
why didn't they denounce this?
00:21:21
why they obeyed orders
00:21:23
illegal and did not comply with the
00:21:24
constitution of the countries in which they
00:21:26
acted third point interference
00:21:28
which was demonstrated by Congress
00:21:30
American in these documents of 500
00:21:32
FBI Secret Service pages
00:21:35
State Department they asked to have
00:21:38
all emails exchanged between the State
00:21:41
United States Department and the Court
00:21:42
supreme brazilian so he's going to have some
00:21:44
sanctions he will have a household for
00:21:47
all those who wait a little bit
00:21:48
deep state cleanup takes time
00:21:51
time and this is what is happening
00:21:52
to do precisely that is what is in
00:21:53
being unmasked 4th point
00:21:55
United States will legislate I have it I
00:21:58
got it
00:21:59
ahead of this year's elections
00:22:00
add new mechanisms
00:22:02
protection of freedom of expression
00:22:04
confidentiality of our data
00:22:05
personal on the Internet and more
00:22:07
integrity of the electoral process therefore
00:22:09
This is really very important
00:22:10
because in every country in the world this
00:22:12
should serve as an inspiration and example
00:22:14
so that citizens put pressure
00:22:16
on their deputies and well that's going to have
00:22:19
global repercussions Well, well
00:22:22
thank you Antoine once again with the
00:22:24
connection we will we will shorten this
00:22:27
chronic in all cases I think that
00:22:28
you were able to address quite a few points
00:22:30
overall you talked about the week
00:22:32
last of some links that we could
00:22:34
consult for more information
00:22:35
more inthetic I think it was
00:22:37
either directly your site or even uh it
00:22:39
were there other links you could
00:22:40
advise can you repeat them
00:22:41
like this we will reach the end of
00:22:43
this column it is still
00:22:44
important I wanted us to be able to
00:22:46
make it good again even if there are
00:22:47
some connection problems and I
00:22:49
am sorry
00:22:50
uh it's still a deal there
00:22:52
censorship which is similar in fact to
00:22:53
to twitterf but which brings
00:22:55
important elements about this country that we do not
00:22:57
don't watch enough who the bres is
00:22:58
that's it so I'll let you uh repeat to
00:23:01
new so the links which can be
00:23:02
consulted for more information
00:23:04
on the subject and then we move on
00:23:06
the interview with Jean-Pierre Petit very
00:23:09
well you go directly to
00:23:12
twitterfilesbasil.com so it's blasil
00:23:14
with a Z like in English eh
00:23:17
twitterfilesbasil.com so there you have
00:23:19
access in English to the details it is put
00:23:22
updated too so it will be updated again
00:23:25
updated on May 8 follow on the
00:23:27
social networks intervention by Éon musk
00:23:30
who brought the documents so the
00:23:32
American Congress at 500 pages of these
00:23:34
data there you also go to
00:23:38
antoinebachelinsenat.com where I relay
00:23:40
all this and other information too
00:23:41
I denounce the communists in Brazil
00:23:45
he who are disguised as a socialist
00:23:46
so here goes
00:23:48
antoinebachelinsenat.com you have
00:23:50
really much more information
00:23:52
thank you Raphaël and thank you very much
00:23:54
Antoine uh looking forward to seeing you again very
00:23:57
soon we will do moreover we talked about it
00:23:59
off a longer interview but on
00:24:01
one on a work that you were able to
00:24:03
going out on Olavo des Carvallo will be a
00:24:05
more philosophical interview
00:24:06
will program this on one condition
00:24:08
obviously it's if your connection
00:24:09
Internet is stable my friend otherwise we
00:24:12
will do a remote interview that we
00:24:13
will broadcast in my opinion to ensure
00:24:15
to have better quality in all
00:24:16
thank you very much for this
00:24:18
chronicle which is important and which
00:24:19
was obviously interesting but
00:24:21
is especially important to know
00:24:23
obviously invites you all to
00:24:24
consult the two sites including as
00:24:27
spoken Antoine Bach it is either his own
00:24:29
Antoon Bachena blog or else
00:24:33
Twitter files Brazil and obviously
00:24:37
it’s the knee of information to be disseminated
00:24:39
so thank you very much Antoine I
00:24:41
I'm going to do a little advertising page
00:24:43
of a few seconds and I will
00:24:45
welcome Jean-Pierre straight away
00:24:46
Small but obviously thanks again
00:24:48
Antoine have a good evening and see you next time
00:24:50
Antoine thank you raphaë ciao
00:24:52
ciao read a profitable magazine
00:24:55
that is to say, inform yourself with
00:24:56
specialists on the subjects we like
00:24:58
but if protecting your finances and your life
00:24:59
private how by applying our
00:25:01
financial strategies the objective
00:25:04
outperform in the face of inflation
00:25:06
confidential letter the only reading
00:25:09
profitable and therefore good evening again to
00:25:13
all I hope this column has helped you
00:25:14
interested of all the spectators of
00:25:16
by Antoine Bachelin Sienna on Brazil
00:25:18
F I obviously invite you to consult
00:25:20
the links that were cited both
00:25:21
sites you talked about Antoine Bachelin SDA
00:25:24
but I have the pleasure and the honor
00:25:26
evening to receive Jean-Pierre Petit
00:25:28
to talk about a very important subject
00:25:31
around its current affairs but which addresses
00:25:34
so a subject uh unfortunately very
00:25:37
sad once again like many
00:25:38
topics that can be discussed on the
00:25:40
French subject of the decline of France and
00:25:42
also some functioning of
00:25:44
corruption and quite simply we can
00:25:46
say mafia and there in this case in
00:25:48
the scientific community but first of all
00:25:50
good evening Jean-Pierre Petit, is that
00:25:51
you hear me well and how
00:25:53
come on, I can hear you very well
00:25:55
yes I am doing the best I can
00:25:58
can at 87 years old that's good perfect in everything
00:26:03
case do not hesitate there for
00:26:04
spectators to tell us if the sound of
00:26:06
Jean-Pierre Petit is good on your side
00:26:08
in any case once again here it is
00:26:09
thank you very much for accepting this
00:26:11
invitation Jean-Pierre to the base I
00:26:13
wanted to invite you to speak
00:26:15
obviously therefore of your work that we
00:26:17
will be able in my opinion
00:26:20
approach before finally speaking
00:26:22
of the subject which will be main for for
00:26:25
This interview is news that you
00:26:27
gave me who absolutely
00:26:28
surprised and shocked and which in my opinion must
00:26:30
absolutely be broadcast and above all
00:26:33
I hope that after this interview a
00:26:35
maximum number of spectators will ensure
00:26:37
to be able to organize yourself to keep up
00:26:38
maximum at a time Jean-Pierre Petit one
00:26:40
another person we are going to cite who
00:26:41
works with Jean-Pierre Petit but
00:26:43
also makes sure to support those who
00:26:46
want to do serious research
00:26:48
and fight against the power of certain
00:26:50
academicians or researchers in France
00:26:51
that's it, but first of all, Jean-Pierre
00:26:55
Small for those who don't
00:26:57
would perhaps not know so you
00:26:58
are you an astrophysicist cosmologist
00:27:01
are you as you have you have quoted
00:27:04
your age you were born so in 1937 you
00:27:06
were able to see the world of research
00:27:09
evolve and change elsewhere for those
00:27:11
who would consult or who would have
00:27:13
consulted your conferences they can even
00:27:15
have information on how to
00:27:16
how did the world of research pass
00:27:18
he has he has changed completely but also
00:27:19
the advance that France could have had and
00:27:22
also from when France
00:27:24
actually started to slow down and even
00:27:25
stop on the plane
00:27:27
search for their ambitions
00:27:29
scientists in any case uh among the
00:27:31
the conferences you were able to give
00:27:33
you also have a comic strip that we
00:27:34
which we will talk about later because
00:27:36
you do popularization
00:27:37
scientific of course we are talking
00:27:39
uh regularly so from the famous model
00:27:41
Janus therefore Jean-Pierre Petit does
00:27:44
you can introduce yourself succinctly
00:27:46
for people who do not know
00:27:47
not uh if I forgot some details
00:27:50
and perhaps also explain to us a
00:27:51
a little bit of your main work before
00:27:54
to talk about the problem that you
00:27:56
want to exhibit this evening let's say that we
00:28:00
just put a little bit into
00:28:02
circulation of a document which allows
00:28:05
people understand the genus model then
00:28:07
you know that having been blacklisted very
00:28:10
early in the world of
00:28:11
editing I bypassed this
00:28:14
difficulty in inventing a new media
00:28:16
who is the scientific comic
00:28:18
eh and these comics are what
00:28:21
amuses me it's only mine
00:28:23
have existed for 47 years and they
00:28:25
are doing very well I have 500,000 readers
00:28:27
in the world they are translated into 40
00:28:29
languages ​​and I think I can say
00:28:31
that they will survive me while I
00:28:34
see I don't know if all
00:28:36
popularizers can say one thing about
00:28:38
this kind there is no problem then
00:28:41
so this Janus model and well uh to one
00:28:45
moment I took my pencil I
00:28:47
said well, it’s time to make a
00:28:49
comic about it so I
00:28:51
scratched uh in 90 page ideas
00:28:54
by the way which is called model génus
00:28:56
against black science then I believe
00:28:58
that we can present the cover of
00:28:59
this band absolutely I will
00:29:01
show right away that you
00:29:03
can see right here and I'm going to same
00:29:05
time immediately send the link which
00:29:07
will therefore be there in the chat also in
00:29:09
description which will allow you to have
00:29:10
therefore access to this comic book which you
00:29:13
will allow us to address this subject
00:29:14
but I'm sure there you go
00:29:15
be able to describe a little more
00:29:16
is therefore the famous Janus model I
00:29:18
let Jean-Pierre speak, that's it then
00:29:20
there is still one thing enough
00:29:22
surprising is that currently we are
00:29:24
a very small number in there we are
00:29:27
practical
00:29:28
two people who really do
00:29:30
actively researching we are
00:29:31
assisted by a small handful of
00:29:33
retired he because to work
00:29:36
on the Janus model it is absolutely necessary
00:29:38
to be free and free people are the
00:29:40
retreat the others really are
00:29:42
immediately massacre me then
00:29:45
I would say there are both bad ones
00:29:48
news and good news
00:29:49
bad news is that we
00:29:52
we are how to say strangled by the
00:29:55
media there is total silence you
00:29:57
know I notice had released a tape
00:29:58
drawn in the time which was called the
00:30:00
wall of silence well that's exactly it
00:30:02
what is really the wall of silence
00:30:03
there is one thing for example is that you
00:30:05
have people like Rault or in the
00:30:06
time like benvenist good ben these
00:30:09
people there they were attacked me I myself
00:30:10
remember I said benvenist you have the
00:30:12
lucky you we attack you me we don't
00:30:14
don't even attack me you will notice a
00:30:16
thing then if someone attacks me but with one
00:30:17
completely different way it is
00:30:19
the love affair but differently
00:30:21
when it comes to the media it's silence
00:30:23
the most total then yet the good ones
00:30:26
news and well, first of all we have
00:30:28
mathematics with us eh and then
00:30:30
we have nature with us nature is
00:30:32
very good girl then you know
00:30:33
maybe for example we just
00:30:35
launch a James web telescope which has the
00:30:40
ability to see in infrared therefore
00:30:42
it allows him to have some
00:30:45
observations that come from very, very
00:30:46
far and uh then in I think
00:30:50
that there is an image that gives you a
00:30:52
galaxy seen by the James telescope uh
00:30:54
Humel start by showing this image
00:30:57
seen through the telescope you must like it I
00:30:59
I'm going to select it right away
00:31:01
and then I will ask you too
00:31:02
obviously Jean-Pierre of perhaps
00:31:04
can then perhaps make a brief
00:31:05
summary of what the Janus model is
00:31:07
for those who
00:31:08
I don't mean it's the news
00:31:10
scientist I will show it to you then
00:31:12
show me the image with galaxy seen by
00:31:14
the model
00:31:15
genus seen by the the the telescope then
00:31:19
see at the bottom there is an image like this
00:31:22
that it could be obtained from the telescope
00:31:24
so you have to understand one thing and that is
00:31:25
that when we receive images that
00:31:27
come from very, very far away and well
00:31:29
causes galaxies to move away from
00:31:31
makes us that they pass into the
00:31:32
red and even in the infrared therefore
00:31:34
that moment uh the only images that we
00:31:37
can be obtained with the Hubble telescope
00:31:40
these were images of x-ray sources
00:31:42
so we had little points like that
00:31:44
that you see at the bottom of this image we
00:31:46
sees that everyone has a little point and people
00:31:48
thought it was the galaxies
00:31:49
primitives so that collides with their
00:31:52
idea that what was being created were
00:31:54
small galaxies which would then
00:31:56
come to fruition now you will see the
00:31:58
same image seen by the James web
00:32:00
pass me this image seen by the James
00:32:02
web here it is and you see that these four
00:32:04
all only small images made
00:32:06
part of a huge spiral galaxy
00:32:08
so at that moment the surprise is
00:32:10
total because the observers
00:32:12
say here are some clichés that come from
00:32:15
500,000 years when the cosmos only
00:32:18
500,000 years and there are galaxies
00:32:20
fully trained and
00:32:23
currently the whole community
00:32:25
scientist of the world is in the in
00:32:27
stress eh and I mean that
00:32:30
when these images were published on
00:32:32
title of the scientific article it was
00:32:34
panic pa etc panic at the asros
00:32:37
astrophysicists how can you
00:32:39
explain that galaxies are born
00:32:41
immediately it's something
00:32:43
impossible so then I will explain
00:32:45
why jamus him he he he planned at
00:32:48
contrary to the fact that galaxies are born in
00:32:49
the first hundreds of millions
00:32:50
years so frankly there is a
00:32:52
cosmological model which predicts the
00:32:54
nesto galaxies we see the model
00:32:57
standard is completely wrong
00:32:59
how come we can't
00:33:01
debate this subject so now
00:33:03
another image that must be shown is
00:33:06
that of the dipole repeller you owe it to yourself
00:33:08
see her no it's not it's that it's
00:33:11
the the the trurs giant dipole repeller
00:33:14
still pass this one and not that one
00:33:16
let's go let's go let's go again here we go
00:33:19
that's it then that's an observation
00:33:21
which dates from 2017 which was made with
00:33:24
the means of the time he is not the
00:33:25
James web telescope they are people
00:33:28
four people there were Hélène
00:33:30
courteous Daniel Pomaret two Frenchmen and
00:33:33
then a Canadian who is Bren Tully and
00:33:35
then an Israeli they made a
00:33:37
cartography of the cosmos at very very
00:33:39
large scale then at that time
00:33:41
this cartography he represents
00:33:42
like this in this picture the point
00:33:44
red in S in the center it represents our
00:33:47
galaxy the place from which we then observe
00:33:49
actually maybe I don't know if
00:33:50
we will clearly see this image but on
00:33:52
on the left there is a kind of task
00:33:54
brown called the attractor
00:33:56
rosary so that's a big set
00:33:59
of galaxies to a hundred million
00:34:01
of galaxies which are represented there but
00:34:03
then on the right there is a kind of
00:34:04
white spot and you see it's gre
00:34:06
trippeller is the great repellent
00:34:09
because when they did this
00:34:10
card you have all these blue lines
00:34:12
which represent the movements that have
00:34:14
galaxies in relation to the universe
00:34:16
you see that these galaxies are
00:34:17
pushed back there are black arrows
00:34:19
they are repelled by this great void
00:34:20
and in 2017 we discover this great void which
00:34:24
is 100 million light years away
00:34:25
distance which is 600 million years
00:34:28
number of the earth and there is currently
00:34:31
no theory that allows
00:34:33
to interpret this model then there the
00:34:35
it's funny if there are readers who
00:34:37
are somewhat familiar with this type of
00:34:38
things you know there is something that
00:34:40
is called Google Scholar Google Scholar
00:34:42
scholar that means it's it's the
00:34:44
the good academic is a bit like
00:34:46
University Google so at that time
00:34:48
when you put on Google SCO you
00:34:49
have a window and then you can
00:34:51
type what came out as
00:34:52
article in this area then you can
00:34:55
diple ripeller dipo ripeller why
00:34:57
dipole because there are two objects there
00:34:59
has the attractive object rosary and the object
00:35:02
repellent gr so that forms a dipole
00:35:05
and the relator dipole is the one which
00:35:07
pushes back then you type dipole reller
00:35:10
and you have the news at that moment
00:35:12
of all the articles that have been published
00:35:14
on the subject since 2017 and what is it
00:35:17
that you find the article of
00:35:18
Jean Pierre
00:35:19
Small and it's not even an article
00:35:21
Jean-Pierre Petit is something I have
00:35:23
put on my website why because
00:35:25
that magazines refuse this kind of thing
00:35:28
there is censorship and we are going to talk about it
00:35:29
just now something unimaginable
00:35:31
the time you were talking to me about David against
00:35:33
doliat I would say it's two Davids
00:35:35
against 2000 Goliath that's what we have
00:35:39
all the astrophisicians against us and
00:35:41
above all, I would like to ask you a
00:35:42
question how long has it been
00:35:44
you face this this guy
00:35:46
opposition because you have when
00:35:48
even a very great career over 60
00:35:50
years in research from
00:35:52
when did you start to
00:35:55
concentrate on this work but not
00:35:57
let's say we've been having difficulties since
00:35:59
60 years old is all of a sudden I had I
00:36:02
hit my forehead I said to myself
00:36:03
let's see I returned to the cell
00:36:06
fluid diff mechanics from Marseille in
00:36:08
1964 we are in 2024 the difference
00:36:11
it's been 60 years it's been 60 years since I
00:36:14
beat against walls against
00:36:16
fortresses, we'll talk about that later
00:36:18
if you want to talk on the phone
00:36:22
things like conspiracy but
00:36:23
no it's not a conspiracy it's
00:36:25
mediocrity but we'll talk about it
00:36:26
will explain why it evolved like that
00:36:28
so you see there you have this dipole
00:36:30
tell well uh what could we do
00:36:32
show you again just now
00:36:33
show them the images of giant tower
00:36:36
let's go back to these images here let's go
00:36:38
not that it's not that it's not that's it
00:36:40
that's it so there you have images
00:36:42
which appeared in 2022 or 2023
00:36:45
something like that and the magazines have
00:36:47
titled uh images of giant black hole
00:36:50
it's as if it proved that it was
00:36:52
black holes gold when you look
00:36:53
these photos you see that the center
00:36:55
it's not black at all eh and there is
00:36:57
a very simple way to
00:36:59
check you know you put on
00:37:01
Photoshop on the original article and then
00:37:04
you take a small square you go
00:37:05
you walk so you take a square
00:37:08
at the bottom you have a bar which you
00:37:11
gives you the equivalent temperatures
00:37:13
see it goes from black to light yellow
00:37:16
so black is when it's cold and
00:37:18
then the light yellow is when it is
00:37:19
5.7 billion degrees next to it is 14
00:37:22
billion degrees very good good then to
00:37:24
that moment when you take a little
00:37:26
square away from the object actually it
00:37:28
is really black so it's cold
00:37:29
the outside but when you take the
00:37:31
square in the center there you have a
00:37:33
surprise you see that it's 1.8
00:37:35
billion degrees so here is a black hole
00:37:37
which is not really black since it is
00:37:39
it's hot inside it's hot
00:37:40
light good the other object is the object
00:37:44
hypermassive which is at the center of the
00:37:46
galaxy same thing so there you have 4
00:37:48
billion degrees at the center then you
00:37:50
know what the the the the say
00:37:51
specialists they say yes but it's
00:37:53
because there is hot Gar in front
00:37:54
it's extraordinary eh then
00:37:57
actually uh I made one
00:38:00
fairly advanced mathematical study I will
00:38:02
tell you the following thing I believe
00:38:05
maybe I'm the only one to say that
00:38:07
I tell you categorically
00:38:09
black hole theory is a pipe dream
00:38:12
mathematics that doesn't hold up
00:38:14
not standing and I remember what I
00:38:16
said my late master Jean-Marie Souriot
00:38:19
who died in 2012 he tells me but everything
00:38:21
the world knows that it doesn't last
00:38:22
all mathematicians know that
00:38:24
can't hold on and that's what we're going to get to
00:38:26
heart of the problem which is suddenly
00:38:28
that theoretical physics and
00:38:31
cosmologists have lost contact with
00:38:33
mathematics uh strange
00:38:35
said theoretical physics it is a
00:38:37
physics which is which which is based on
00:38:39
what is deficient mathematics?
00:38:41
really good so there you go uh
00:38:45
all this to tell you that people
00:38:47
who are interested in this comic they
00:38:49
will be able to be put in contact with
00:38:51
all these things so that's it
00:38:53
the problems that arise we have
00:38:55
uh a big gap 200 million
00:38:59
light but now the years have
00:39:00
past we don't have one we have 5 or six
00:39:03
and at that moment we can say that the
00:39:05
great scientific reflection is
00:39:07
what is going on some
00:39:09
scientists believe that the laws of
00:39:11
physics are not the same in these
00:39:12
holes eh that's it but not simply and
00:39:15
so indeed there was a one
00:39:17
conference in Morocco 6 months ago people
00:39:20
who had also invited illuminated
00:39:22
the black hole expert and everyone
00:39:24
nods saying maybe
00:39:26
are we on the eve of a change
00:39:28
paradigm but yes what is
00:39:29
it’s just a paradigm shift
00:39:31
consists of saying we will have to change
00:39:33
vision of the universe and that for me
00:39:36
door it's unthinkable that we have
00:39:38
of such blocking good then next
00:39:41
maybe we'll move on to a second one
00:39:43
section and you will be able to present it
00:39:45
so I gave two conferences then
00:39:48
see for example you are talking about blocking
00:39:50
but usually when we make a
00:39:52
conference we say to ourselves there is a faculty
00:39:54
who will lend me an amphitheater eh?
00:39:56
absolutely because I also want to
00:39:58
remember is that you actually you
00:39:59
are not just a researcher at
00:40:01
you in your house is that you
00:40:03
have a recognized research background
00:40:06
and official uh but I I made some
00:40:09
a lot of work indeed if we
00:40:10
start doing that it's like we
00:40:12
opened a cupboard with boxes
00:40:15
cardboard with photos there is there is
00:40:16
lots of memories for 60 years
00:40:19
work what I had two careers
00:40:20
end up we can talk about it all at once
00:40:22
time because we have time there was
00:40:24
first 20 years of MHD and then 40 years of
00:40:26
cosmology well well 20 years of MHD I can
00:40:29
tell you the following thing is that
00:40:30
at the end of these 20 years after having led
00:40:32
conflicts fighting in
00:40:34
mind-blowing conditions after doing
00:40:37
experiments with equipment
00:40:39
fortune in a maid's room
00:40:41
day I ended up saying to myself it's not
00:40:42
possible I put everything in a bag I
00:40:44
put all my files in two bags
00:40:46
big garbage bags and I was thrown
00:40:48
it's in the trash, it's for when
00:40:49
people talk to me about MHD I say listen
00:40:51
I gave up in 1983, don't insist
00:40:55
not it's over I don't want to be anymore
00:40:56
put in but I made one
00:40:59
conference in pertui uh and you there you
00:41:02
find the address on my site
00:41:04
internet unfortunately I didn't have it
00:41:05
time I didn't prepare that we could have
00:41:07
display it on the screen maybe we
00:41:09
will display it in the delayed version
00:41:10
what absolutely I will put everything in
00:41:12
description both the because you
00:41:14
you you you have a conference that I have
00:41:16
gave a conference that lasts I think
00:41:18
1h3 thing like this and there people
00:41:21
asked me, do you
00:41:22
could talk about your past
00:41:23
researcher so I did it and this
00:41:26
conference it is done while running
00:41:28
it is and even I said the following thing
00:41:30
is that there are so many things to
00:41:31
say that I am going to read a text and it is
00:41:34
did one thing I've never done
00:41:35
example so that the sentences resonate
00:41:38
every time so if you see this
00:41:39
conference maybe you will
00:41:41
stop saying I'm going to start everything again
00:41:43
on time but when you see what I
00:41:45
tells about the MHD it is to draw up the
00:41:48
hair on the head it's really a
00:41:50
incompetent [ __ ] festival
00:41:54
but really we are completely past then
00:41:56
what happened and
00:41:58
well in
00:41:59
1975 I suddenly thought about
00:42:02
experiences that I had made
00:42:03
laass fluid mechanics and with these
00:42:06
experiences there we managed to make
00:42:08
shock waves with forces
00:42:10
electromagnetic without obstacles and
00:42:12
this I said to myself but if we
00:42:14
manages to create shock waves
00:42:16
without obstacle perhaps only with these
00:42:18
forces we can remove the shock waves
00:42:20
and at that moment the idea was to arrive
00:42:23
to make susonic flights and even
00:42:25
hypersonic without shock wave
00:42:27
well I can tell you this
00:42:29
next time I thought I was crazy when
00:42:32
we innovate and especially in France when we
00:42:34
innovate we are taken for crazy
00:42:37
so why do I dare to say that well
00:42:40
it's because years later a
00:42:42
day a representative of the CNRS arrives with
00:42:45
a big file it was my file
00:42:47
researcher and I said but do I
00:42:49
can consult it ah yes there is no
00:42:50
problem so I consulted it and I
00:42:53
found a letter that was mail
00:42:54
in English from a specialist
00:42:58
American to whom the CNS had asked
00:43:01
could say the letter was at
00:43:03
we there is a guy who wants to fly without
00:43:05
make a shock wave does it have a
00:43:07
grain he and the answer was I can
00:43:10
testify this man normal condition
00:43:13
translation I can assure you that this
00:43:15
guy enjoys all his wits that's it ad
00:43:19
don strangeness i see nothing strange
00:43:23
but you
00:43:24
see I can assure you that this guy has
00:43:26
all his head you realize and
00:43:28
absolutely and and what you were in
00:43:29
explaining just now and
00:43:30
excuse me you didn't have
00:43:32
finished the sentence is that you were in
00:43:33
also saying that therefore you have
00:43:35
hosted a conference recently
00:43:36
conference time you are where
00:43:38
you were obliged to pay the cost yourself
00:43:40
rental of the room €2500 because we
00:43:43
denies you access to amphitheaters
00:43:45
while you still have a
00:43:46
recognized background of researchers and and and
00:43:49
you cannot present your work
00:43:51
we will talk about the other aspects later
00:43:53
of rejection on your work but in
00:43:55
in any case you are obliged to
00:43:57
to take care of making sales
00:43:59
precisely to do the most promotion
00:44:01
for the sale of your work for example
00:44:02
with the comic strip for you to rent
00:44:05
even a room to present
00:44:07
scientific work that's not exactly
00:44:09
for example last March we published
00:44:13
a thousand copies of this tape
00:44:15
drawn whose profile will be used to
00:44:17
pay for the rental of the room
00:44:19
realize I am obliged to
00:44:21
earn money with my work for
00:44:23
comb the rental of a room
00:44:25
to give a conference because
00:44:28
there's no point in me making one
00:44:29
request for conferences there is even
00:44:31
no response the seminars are
00:44:33
closed do not respond there is a friend
00:44:36
who has who
00:44:39
to Gilbert Attard whom I quote adorable he
00:44:43
told me you know you are the Frankenstein of
00:44:45
science eh and I would like it
00:44:49
come into debate but they have a
00:44:52
scare me that you can't
00:44:54
knowing it's not that I'm going to throw myself away
00:44:56
on the people that I'm going to hit them
00:44:58
insult not at all but I can accommodate
00:45:01
a theorem between the two eyes at 20 m
00:45:03
you see it's a bit like the wink of the
00:45:06
theoretical physics they have a fear
00:45:08
terrible you know when there is a
00:45:10
conflict with scientists and when
00:45:12
it's scientific to explain
00:45:14
seminar but it's like a fight
00:45:16
the extreme what see
00:45:18
and this is done without raising the sight when
00:45:22
we say to someone I'm sorry but
00:45:25
I believe that what you
00:45:27
idea is not entirely consistent with the
00:45:29
problem posed it is catastrophic for
00:45:31
this guy means you have nothing
00:45:33
understood my good man that's all and
00:45:35
I've already done things like that in
00:45:37
seminar and the adversary is
00:45:39
completely collapsed they did not
00:45:41
want to be in front of me yes because
00:45:44
what must also be added is that
00:45:46
therefore in relation to your work and in
00:45:47
the occurrence therefore your work around the
00:45:48
model
00:45:49
Janus the returns you have
00:45:51
that is to say the rejection that you have for
00:45:53
the publication of your work or even
00:45:55
for the fact of being able to make conferences is that there is no
00:45:57
argument behind you have
00:45:58
academicians who are against you and who
00:46:00
publish papers which show that they
00:46:01
have not read your work you are talking about
00:46:03
example of an academician who
00:46:05
is called thbao d'amour if I'm wrong
00:46:07
not who who who precisely took care of
00:46:10
give answers to say that basically
00:46:11
your model was wrong or at the beginning in
00:46:15
in any case because afterwards there were
00:46:16
paper changes but I
00:46:17
I'll let it be told but in any case
00:46:18
there is no answer
00:46:19
really on the bottom which is another
00:46:20
times for those who because for you
00:46:22
it can obviously bathe you in
00:46:24
this has been going on for years but there are some
00:46:25
full in my opinion of spectators who will
00:46:26
will discover that there we speak when
00:46:28
even from a research environment
00:46:29
scientifically we could say that there
00:46:31
the goal is research so we
00:46:33
the goal would be to work
00:46:35
find as much as possible, well in fact
00:46:38
information that we could here
00:46:39
verify to advance science
00:46:41
but there is no and there are blockages without
00:46:42
reason then see there is one thing you
00:46:45
evoke the character of thibao d'amour
00:46:47
who is an academician thba of love it is
00:46:49
Mister cosmology in France good eh
00:46:52
so all of a sudden in 2019 it happened
00:46:56
said that's it I found the flaw in
00:46:57
the genus model eh and at that moment
00:47:00
he installed in his Institute page
00:47:02
high studies of bursurvette one
00:47:05
article and it even does one thing
00:47:07
extraordinary open your ears
00:47:09
he sent a letter to my home
00:47:12
ordered with acknowledgment of receipt
00:47:14
realize this is the first time that
00:47:15
it happens that an academician sends to a
00:47:17
another scientist a letter
00:47:18
recommended acknowledgment of receipt and
00:47:20
it was a letter where he said this
00:47:21
I put your work on the ground basta and
00:47:24
at that point I responded but
00:47:27
your criticism is relevant but that
00:47:29
addresses previous work this
00:47:30
problem is already solved and I
00:47:33
sends the article in question but in
00:47:35
the registered letter upon receipt uh
00:47:38
you can show it on the screen I
00:47:40
I will send you the image et cetera and we
00:47:42
see a sentence I reserve the right
00:47:44
to send a copy of this letter to
00:47:46
anyone interested in the model
00:47:48
genus in other words what love has
00:47:50
fact is that he sent this letter
00:47:53
and this report to all journalists
00:47:55
scientists to all journalists in
00:47:57
general and to all scientists who
00:47:59
knew and once it was
00:48:01
done because he really thought
00:48:02
that he had solved the problem and I
00:48:04
say well no actually no no now
00:48:07
you address you report a
00:48:10
problem which no longer exists what then
00:48:12
obviously I offered to meet him
00:48:14
no answer all I could do
00:48:15
I read some writing no response to you
00:48:18
you realize then if I lived
00:48:20
Paris well I could take the train
00:48:22
go to bursurivette and then return
00:48:24
in his office saying my man
00:48:25
now you can't tell what it is anymore
00:48:27
you then realize everything differently
00:48:29
it's total silence so I
00:48:31
addressed to the president of the Academy of
00:48:33
Sciences no answer I got
00:48:35
addressed to Étienne J who is the
00:48:36
permanent secretary no response I
00:48:38
I spoke to Emmanuel Hulmo who is
00:48:41
the director of his institute no
00:48:43
answer is total silence but
00:48:45
it is unimaginable because these
00:48:47
this article is defamation
00:48:49
scientific eh h it's the
00:48:52
scientific defamation but for
00:48:54
what do you think of love he says to himself
00:48:56
it's not possible that he's right
00:48:58
but it is true for example
00:48:59
the hour and there and there I just allow myself
00:49:01
to ask you a question because there
00:49:02
There are lots of people there
00:49:03
you discover so obviously it POS
00:49:05
questions good what is the Janus model and c once again so
00:49:07
that's why we keep it
00:49:08
screen sharing for example for a
00:49:09
popularized way you therefore have the comic
00:49:11
Jean-Pierre little there you can
00:49:12
obviously order we posted it
00:49:15
link and it will be posted as a replay
00:49:16
but above all it is I ask you
00:49:17
directly the question what why in
00:49:20
makes such reactions according to you
00:49:22
would actually be for what danger
00:49:24
represents your work that's what we
00:49:25
might have difficulty understanding then
00:49:27
we will show an image you have one
00:49:29
image where we see Monsieur Albert is
00:49:31
Einstein and then I no I think that
00:49:33
this is this one no before before
00:49:36
before that one then there at the top well you
00:49:39
have Einstein with his equation you
00:49:40
see up there r minu et cetera good
00:49:43
obviously we are not going to detail what
00:49:44
it's but this equation is the basis
00:49:47
of general relativity and this
00:49:49
general relativity and well it doesn't work
00:49:52
more currently and what
00:49:54
proposes Jean-Pierre Petit and his gang
00:49:57
next image previous go ahead
00:50:00
so yes I will show it to you
00:50:02
hop so there you go and there you have the
00:50:04
gus model what is it
00:50:05
Janus model is not an equation
00:50:07
it's two equations in other words
00:50:10
what is the proposal and well
00:50:12
Einstein's equation worked
00:50:14
for a while it's not bad
00:50:16
but now there's something better then you
00:50:17
see pretend we do better
00:50:19
that Einstein it's not possible it's not
00:50:22
possible it's like pretending that we
00:50:23
eliminates shock waves
00:50:25
you see eh and when you when the
00:50:28
people will say but what is it
00:50:29
jamus model and well that's it
00:50:30
proposal not to replace
00:50:33
but to extend the Einstein model
00:50:36
with this system which is
00:50:37
mathematically more complex then
00:50:40
and also add something so there
00:50:42
well obviously because there the image
00:50:43
that we show obviously comes from a
00:50:45
BD but you have there are available
00:50:47
on your site which we will put
00:50:49
description obviously more than one
00:50:50
forty videos that you were able to
00:50:52
produce there are also obviously the
00:50:53
works which can be consulted which
00:50:54
are works uh well there we will say
00:50:56
so it's not on tape
00:50:58
drawn it’s it’s really work
00:50:59
so totally so serious and and
00:51:02
scientific reserved moreover for my
00:51:03
advice to those who have the knowledge
00:51:05
to be able to deal with these subjects I
00:51:08
therefore invites you for those who would have
00:51:09
the level and who would discover this subject
00:51:10
there obviously to consult it we will put
00:51:12
all links in description but you
00:51:15
see I don't think we should be afraid
00:51:17
words if I'm right then I am
00:51:21
new Einstein you see but it's
00:51:24
scary to say something like that
00:51:26
not
00:51:27
ah everyone is trembling but me
00:51:29
I don't care I mean at 87 years old I I
00:51:31
does not seek notoriety prices
00:51:34
et cetera it's too late something like
00:51:36
that but Fran is really in trouble
00:51:40
in many areas we are in the process of
00:51:42
to descend in free fall all at once
00:51:44
suddenly with these two equations we have the
00:51:47
possibility of being in the lead eh and there at
00:51:49
cause of love thbo academician
00:51:52
for 5 years which blocks all this
00:51:55
luck we lose it then afterwards it
00:51:57
passed the next thing as you
00:52:00
say I had to pay to rent some
00:52:02
rooms so I rented a room in March
00:52:05
2024 in Paris and the year before in
00:52:07
January 2023 I also rented a
00:52:09
room so I had started doing this
00:52:11
kind of conference and these conferences
00:52:13
there they were not really aimed at
00:52:15
general public let's say that there are lots of
00:52:17
people who are engineers who are
00:52:19
scientists who are
00:52:21
mathematicians who have professional
00:52:23
secondary school in physics and math which
00:52:25
come then then indeed
00:52:27
the man in the street sometimes if he
00:52:28
came to a conference like that he said
00:52:29
oh this is happening to me terribly
00:52:31
above the head then it's true
00:52:32
that when we had the conference
00:52:34
from January 2023 I had you know
00:52:38
when I give these conferences I
00:52:40
think of the pertu room there were 500
00:52:42
places and there it was only €150.
00:52:45
when I announced in December 2023 that
00:52:49
people
00:52:50
could fill out a form to
00:52:52
register in 15 days everything was taken care of
00:52:55
that is to say that the two 50 places of
00:52:57
pertu on December 15 finished the 500
00:53:00
places
00:53:01
of pertu the same and it is necessary to explain
00:53:04
as well as the people who participate
00:53:06
at your conferences are people who
00:53:07
have a scientific background
00:53:09
are not only people
00:53:10
who discovered your popularization
00:53:12
scientific there are obviously therefore
00:53:14
people with real training
00:53:16
and a high level I want to
00:53:19
specify that you are in fact followed by
00:53:21
yes of course of course of course then
00:53:24
what I mean is that in this
00:53:26
January conference we had some
00:53:28
something like 40% of the room which was
00:53:31
people who had a level
00:53:32
special mathematics who had made
00:53:33
higher studies and so on but for
00:53:36
the March conference was 95% eh
00:53:39
I was in front of a room when I
00:53:41
asked people who are professional engineers
00:53:43
et cetera raise your hands everyone
00:53:44
raised your hand there were maybe 10
00:53:46
people who were to be
00:53:48
considered the general public you
00:53:49
so see in other words all that
00:53:52
it has a certain impact
00:53:55
still good and good
00:53:57
uh following the January conference he
00:54:00
there is a young engineer called
00:54:03
ISAM ZLI then it's a Franco-Moroccan
00:54:06
that is to say, he is the son of a
00:54:07
Moroccan mason who immigrated to France
00:54:10
in the 70s then he was born
00:54:12
in France good he is 44 years old he is married to
00:54:15
a woman who is also Franco-Moroccan
00:54:17
who comes from the bourgeoisie of du
00:54:20
Morocco et cetera she is also an engineer
00:54:22
he is an engineer he came across this
00:54:24
that interested him, I wouldn’t say that
00:54:26
interested him it fascinated him and if
00:54:29
you want it's rare to meet
00:54:31
passionate people or research we don't
00:54:34
can't do that without passion you
00:54:36
understand, well this guy there was
00:54:39
passionate about this thing - I was amazed
00:54:42
by its absorption capacity it made
00:54:44
a completely engineering school
00:54:46
OK but not normal
00:54:47
higher is not Polytechnique eh
00:54:49
that's it but on the other hand it has an opening
00:54:52
I say in the preface to this book I have
00:54:54
never seen a guy capable of going and
00:54:57
to digest so many things too
00:54:58
quickly so after 6 months it
00:55:01
had gone around Janus and at this
00:55:03
at that moment I didn't know how
00:55:05
keep him busy I tell him listen write a
00:55:08
book he wrote a book so he
00:55:10
wrote this book cosmological model Janus
00:55:12
bimetric universe perspective and challenge
00:55:15
it's a book that continues to grow
00:55:17
currently does something like
00:55:18
230 pages eh so let's say that for
00:55:21
the general public they can buy it
00:55:23
like a collector's item they
00:55:25
will put in in the library see
00:55:27
eh they can also buy it for
00:55:29
support this boy because normally
00:55:31
it is very important that this book is
00:55:33
bought but also and there it is so good
00:55:36
it is a work truly
00:55:37
technique reserved for understanding
00:55:39
to those who have training
00:55:40
scientific however and that makes you
00:55:42
good to remind you, it’s such a topic
00:55:43
that we are approaching where we are talking
00:55:45
ultimately in fact of censorship of
00:55:46
sabotage to work and which can
00:55:49
have a big impact on health
00:55:51
moral finally daily life itself
00:55:53
for someone's professional life
00:55:55
here, don't hesitate to obviously also
00:55:57
consult this book wherever
00:55:59
to support the person or even if
00:56:00
you have a scientific background
00:56:02
obviously to work on it for
00:56:04
discover the work that was able to be carried out
00:56:06
so Mr. ISAM zgel there you go
00:56:08
so GTI 44 years old it has a very good
00:56:12
head he came you will see that
00:56:16
you will see it in me I made him
00:56:18
I made him participate in the conference
00:56:19
from March he speaks very well then after he
00:56:22
signed his book he was everything
00:56:23
happy but if someone suddenly
00:56:26
was aware that something was happening
00:56:28
pass we will say but there you go Mr. little
00:56:31
apparently your work has something
00:56:33
something important so what is it
00:56:35
should be done what should be done
00:56:36
to do would it take money
00:56:38
money you know me it's the
00:56:39
paper pencil if you give me a pen
00:56:42
in massive nor that won't change me
00:56:44
a lot but there is one thing
00:56:46
I think Mr. ISAM gli should
00:56:48
have a research position and that
00:56:51
France it is not possible it is not
00:56:53
not possible because we have we we are
00:56:56
unable to welcome talent voz
00:56:58
but what is his current situation
00:56:59
maybe to give more pressure
00:57:01
because there you talked about his
00:57:02
basic course
00:57:03
so therefore naturalized French he has he has
00:57:06
then completed higher studies in
00:57:08
France but what is its sound
00:57:10
its its current status why by
00:57:11
example isn't it a researcher is it
00:57:13
that he works in the environment
00:57:14
scientist but in another position ah
00:57:16
no he works in a company he
00:57:17
work as a
00:57:18
computer scientist is really also a
00:57:20
work he did on the side not
00:57:22
researcher quite simply it is a
00:57:23
guy who was very interested in
00:57:25
physical and then he had an appetite for
00:57:27
extraordinary knowledge what is it
00:57:29
all I have ever encountered that so this
00:57:31
book there well the people who are at the level
00:57:33
matp et cetera which the L which say and
00:57:36
he wrote it, it's not me
00:57:38
I wasn't there holding him
00:57:40
hand that's all
00:57:42
so the urgency would be to do
00:57:44
so that this boy can do some
00:57:46
full-time research you see and that
00:57:48
it's not possible it's not thinkable we
00:57:50
will say but you understand it would be necessary
00:57:52
do a degree in physics would be necessary
00:57:53
that he passes to Dea he would have to
00:57:55
can't get away with it so
00:57:57
at that moment the only thing I see is it
00:57:59
turns out that our work is very good
00:58:02
welcomed in Morocco by
00:58:03
mathematicians then there are
00:58:05
mathematicians from the University of Raba
00:58:07
who were also students of
00:58:08
sourot that's why they were
00:58:10
receptive to this kind of thing then I
00:58:12
am also in contact with a
00:58:13
mathematician who is also
00:58:15
Franco-Moroccan who also immigrated who
00:58:17
was naturalized French who made a
00:58:19
career in France and 70 years old eh well he
00:58:21
is a mathematician the welcome is all at
00:58:23
does good good and I you know me I I
00:58:26
put in in my site be
00:58:28
realistic consider the possible you know
00:58:30
this old motto of M 68 but it is
00:58:33
really, let's be realistic, what is it?
00:58:35
what needs to be done so that ichan can
00:58:38
have a research position well I
00:58:40
only see one solution when we
00:58:42
will have a sufficiently constructed file
00:58:44
well I will try to meet the king of
00:58:45
Morocco eh and I would tell him listen no
00:58:48
but there's only that, let's say we need a
00:58:50
autocratic power of a guy who will say
00:58:53
well listen I slap my fingers
00:58:55
do what is necessary yes it is and and and
00:58:57
there that is to say that there you
00:58:58
actually raise a problem we have one
00:59:00
could talk about it during our first
00:59:01
exchange uh a problem in fact which
00:59:03
affects all areas in fact
00:59:04
France and which is actually showing the
00:59:06
situation in which France is
00:59:07
currently unfortunately it is in
00:59:08
a phase of complete decline which does not
00:59:10
not
00:59:11
French lation and from all angles
00:59:13
you know there we are talking about the middle
00:59:15
scientific but the number of young people
00:59:16
craftsmen who expatriate because
00:59:18
they can't work
00:59:19
together because of the conditions
00:59:20
obviously either economical or even
00:59:22
term you know of regulation of
00:59:23
laws that cannot work in
00:59:25
done in condition they are obliged in
00:59:27
actually leaving the country
00:59:29
quite simply work and there we see
00:59:31
also therefore that it also affects the
00:59:34
therefore scientific environment and there for this
00:59:36
who appreciates in addition we do not present
00:59:37
that's when we introduce you
00:59:39
mister little, we are not talking about
00:59:40
someone who is all alone in his
00:59:42
room it is still a journey of
00:59:44
of recognized researchers with in fact a
00:59:46
work which is therefore carried out and which
00:59:49
is not criticized which is not analyzed
00:59:51
oror when it was analyzed between
00:59:53
quotation marks to lead to an answer
00:59:55
it was it's an additional answer which
00:59:56
was false so it's it's it's a
00:59:59
situation which is really
01:00:00
catastrophic but you know then we
01:00:02
will we be able to talk about it what is it
01:00:04
cosmology what is it
01:00:05
astrophysics well well you take by
01:00:07
example theoretical physics
01:00:08
theoretical physics it is in crisis
01:00:10
so I'm going to name names take one
01:00:12
character that we see quite often
01:00:14
it's Aurélien Barot but what is
01:00:16
Aurélien Barot released a response
01:00:19
nothing take luminé what does he have
01:00:21
released an image of a black hole
01:00:23
that is to say nothing take the expert chz
01:00:26
in general relativity what does it have
01:00:28
produces nothing all these people are
01:00:30
not productive see it's
01:00:32
extraordinary take Françoise Courelle
01:00:35
says she has 1000 posts but
01:00:37
what will remain of this GL in
01:00:39
the history of science see he was a
01:00:41
time you are going to speak at the time
01:00:42
Napoleonic you look at the Academy
01:00:44
sciences but you have names
01:00:46
in there the place the barn thing
01:00:50
fish you have half of these
01:00:52
people who were going to stay in the
01:00:53
dictionary you find their name
01:00:56
now you take the Academy of
01:00:57
Sciences and you say but what
01:00:59
who will leave some trace
01:01:00
no one eh so now what
01:01:03
what people do is that they become
01:01:05
popularizers that’s what annoys them
01:01:07
it’s that I’m not bad too
01:01:08
on this side and not only am I
01:01:09
not bad me my traces remain
01:01:12
sustainable while others are not
01:01:13
example there is someone who comes from
01:01:15
die who is uber r peace to his soul
01:01:17
but what did uber r produce
01:01:19
scientific product nothing he produced
01:01:21
of speech the universe which was a
01:01:23
very hot little ball et cetera and
01:01:25
currently what these people are doing they
01:01:27
make videos
01:01:28
we no longer finish you have a guy whose
01:01:30
I forget the name of these big questions
01:01:33
that's what's before the big one
01:01:34
bang does time exist can we
01:01:36
travel in time finally stuff
01:01:38
like that they no longer know what to do
01:01:39
are they making one video per week for
01:01:42
one book per month too and one book per
01:01:44
months and what's in these
01:01:45
Bouqu there is nothing take one
01:01:47
peu lumin by lumin released 2 3 ago
01:01:51
in a book called the foam of
01:01:53
space-time and he told me that
01:01:56
Jacob's editions asked him what
01:01:59
book for a long time but when you
01:02:00
see this book you say but
01:02:02
what do I get out of it, nothing, nothing
01:02:04
are books in which everything
01:02:06
is conditional would be could
01:02:09
would explain these are tracks then he
01:02:11
there is a first clue that this one
01:02:13
second track that jeanus is not
01:02:15
the same it's really we have you know it
01:02:18
there is this English word which is Clem
01:02:20
claim exactly there is one
01:02:22
claim this model there it explains
01:02:24
about twenty of the phenomenon
01:02:26
observational and it is not
01:02:28
contradiction with any of these
01:02:29
phenomena but I would have another
01:02:31
question to ask yourself because there then
01:02:33
we are talking about a problem that there is
01:02:34
in France but therefore since the time when
01:02:36
where you carry out this work uh
01:02:38
what stopped you from either
01:02:41
to seek to publish your work either
01:02:44
abroad or even are your
01:02:45
work was resumed because
01:02:47
maybe you can talk one
01:02:48
a little bit, that is, even France
01:02:50
today beyond being completely
01:02:52
to pick it up eh to say it
01:02:53
term or even to be able to sabotage
01:02:54
certain areas uh it needs to be explained
01:02:56
as well as in the scientific community
01:02:58
today it is really dominated by
01:02:59
Anglo-Saxon environment in any case
01:03:01
magazines are English speaking so uh uh
01:03:03
what was the reception uh in these
01:03:05
environments of your work because there
01:03:06
we talk about certain Voes as best we could
01:03:08
talk about your comic strip which uh which
01:03:11
who is still who has who had a
01:03:12
strong popularization success which can
01:03:14
still show that there is a
01:03:15
real work that is being done is
01:03:17
important to remember uh and by
01:03:19
in relation to your other work that she has
01:03:21
been the reception for example in the
01:03:22
Anglo-Saxon environment so if you want
01:03:24
there is one thing is that
01:03:26
uh I think that actually but there
01:03:29
there is a crisis in this science
01:03:31
Anglo-Saxon but I will talk about it in a
01:03:33
second time in the first time I
01:03:35
tell you first I start by doing
01:03:36
20 years of MHD eh and that’s 20 years of
01:03:39
MHD if we really want to have a
01:03:40
quick description in current it is necessary
01:03:42
watch the video of the conference
01:03:44
that I gave the pertu eh that's it then
01:03:46
actually uh I am inventive
01:03:50
It was my mom who made me like
01:03:52
that eh when me you know I think
01:03:56
I spent the whole war in a
01:03:58
lost place and I had no
01:04:00
toys then as I had no toys
01:04:02
I had to invent things
01:04:04
toys children who are obliged
01:04:06
to invent their toys because there are
01:04:07
nothing at all does it go very far by
01:04:10
there was I didn't have a train
01:04:11
electric I've never had one so at this
01:04:13
moment with iron wires I made
01:04:15
a railroad track and I put that on
01:04:17
a board and I had a train
01:04:19
roulette that I could circulate in
01:04:21
moving the board so there I was
01:04:23
obliged to invent my toys I
01:04:25
remember that when
01:04:26
I was a student in a small class
01:04:29
I made a machine gun
01:04:30
match for example with a crank
01:04:32
cl cl then it was my physics teacher
01:04:35
who said to the principal listen to this guy
01:04:38
will be an engineer later it's not
01:04:39
look what he invented I told him
01:04:41
confiscate a machine gun today
01:04:43
ok so here it is
01:04:45
I was I couldn't do anything else
01:04:47
what else to invent when I am
01:04:50
returned to superhéos this is exactly what
01:04:51
that I did and an inventor above all
01:04:54
it’s a pain in the ass eh uh and when
01:04:57
I was in superheroes I made
01:04:59
physics experiments which were
01:05:01
considered impossible ENF no I
01:05:03
think I'm closing the file because
01:05:05
that it would be so good yes of all
01:05:06
way again I really can
01:05:08
simply invite them
01:05:09
spectators who who discovered you at
01:05:11
view the conferences you have
01:05:12
could even give all the interviews he
01:05:15
there is both good on your channel or
01:05:16
even the interviews he may have had on
01:05:18
different specific subjects because
01:05:19
each time it can still take
01:05:21
quite a bit of time but in any case
01:05:22
you have everything accessible
01:05:24
don't hesitate to look at me then
01:05:26
we come to the MHD uh so I'm coming back
01:05:29
at the CNRS in
01:05:31
1964 as a research engineer and
01:05:34
at that moment I have a contract I must
01:05:36
study this cel I discover MHD and
01:05:40
then what I do is that being
01:05:43
faced with an experimental problem I
01:05:45
I asked myself what is the
01:05:47
theory that goes with it and what
01:05:49
that moment I invested in math
01:05:51
that go with it I don't have a strong taste
01:05:53
for mathematics but I don't know
01:05:55
not when you have to do
01:05:56
mechanics you look at the manual you
01:05:58
read the manual but you have to
01:06:00
I immersed myself in the theory
01:06:02
so imagine that this MHD has
01:06:05
a property is that it can be understood
01:06:07
in a 7p-dimensional space and not 4
01:06:09
it's not bad eh so I found it
01:06:11
that's funny I found it funny oh
01:06:13
great so I started writing
01:06:15
things on the board and my colleagues
01:06:17
when they passed they said but you
01:06:19
write what it is Chinese no no
01:06:21
it is a special mathematics that we
01:06:23
use to do this it's called
01:06:24
diadic algebra then it is
01:06:26
funny there are lots of little droppings
01:06:27
of mouths of the stars of things but
01:06:29
It works well and thanks to that I have
01:06:32
I progressed very quickly which means
01:06:34
that from 1967 3 years later I achieved a
01:06:38
experience on which everyone
01:06:39
had failed I made it work
01:06:41
device with two temperatures instead
01:06:43
of one you see eh and that was
01:06:45
presented at cololloc international and the
01:06:48
Russians whose leader was
01:06:50
vellikov he said and imagine
01:06:53
that those who are in advance are the
01:06:56
French you hear we were in
01:06:57
advance and the French were
01:06:59
Jean-Pierre Petit in Marseille in his
01:07:01
lab and
01:07:04
suddenly the entire MHD community made a
01:07:07
international roommate in Marseille
01:07:09
something like this has never happened
01:07:11
see then uh then well well I
01:07:15
left this laboratory for a
01:07:16
very simple reason is that if I were
01:07:18
stayed in there I would have gone crazy
01:07:20
you know there are there are circles of
01:07:22
search which are downright baskets
01:07:23
of crab you have to go then to a
01:07:25
moment I said to myself okay if I stay
01:07:27
it's going to be very unfortunate in there
01:07:28
we must leave this device now
01:07:31
I built that weighs tens of
01:07:33
tones I won't be able to take it under
01:07:35
my arm the only way to be free
01:07:37
it's paper pencil and at that moment
01:07:39
I became a pure theoretician and it is
01:07:42
you know that's what allows you to be
01:07:43
free a mathematician he is free
01:07:45
no one can annoy him we can't
01:07:47
cut off his credits if we take him
01:07:49
his pen he will take another pen
01:07:51
that's it for 40 years
01:07:53
I was a theoretician and I was able to have
01:07:55
my freedom and then well it's told
01:07:59
in the video I imagined that we could
01:08:01
remove shock waves from ones
01:08:04
shock that's an analogy it's the waves
01:08:06
from the transoms of the boats so with a friend
01:08:08
whose name is Maurice vital who is dead
01:08:10
a year ago and well we made a
01:08:12
experience we managed to remove a
01:08:14
wave of traves it was still quite good
01:08:16
extraordinary
01:08:17
well everything is told in this video
01:08:20
with pictures and simply uh
01:08:24
the army screwed everything up the army
01:08:27
everything [ __ ] up why because
01:08:29
for her it was a secret defense thing
01:08:31
this led to missiles of
01:08:33
hypersonic cruise the word was
01:08:35
used since the 70s then
01:08:39
just what the people said
01:08:40
military never Jean-Pierre Petit
01:08:42
will not agree to sign an agreement
01:08:44
defense secret read for him research
01:08:47
it's necessarily open he will never want
01:08:49
walk with the challenge plus I wasn't
01:08:52
especially tempted by research
01:08:54
military you see he no really
01:08:56
so uh what they tried to do
01:08:58
many times it is to take my
01:09:01
ideas and try to develop them
01:09:02
elsewhere and I remember there
01:09:05
had a guy whose first name was
01:09:06
Gilles one day he comes into his house
01:09:09
the director of French research
01:09:11
soldier with a file that I had
01:09:13
written and he has this sentence now
01:09:15
that we have Jean-Pierre's ideas
01:09:17
Little why bother us with him
01:09:18
see that is to say that this whole caste
01:09:21
idiot uh would give himself the rights
01:09:25
to be extremely dishonest and cynical
01:09:28
in the interest of France in
01:09:29
the interest of the strategy what
01:09:31
let's say that scientific plunder
01:09:34
does not exist in the army if we take
01:09:36
ideas are in the interest of
01:09:37
country see this is great then
01:09:40
after 20 years like that I said okay
01:09:42
listen to me, I'll stop, that's all, and I have
01:09:45
changed discipline I completely
01:09:46
abandoned see so now I
01:09:50
am then put the publications but
01:09:53
you know how to say uh it's not the
01:09:57
Anglo-Saxon world when we innovate uh
01:10:01
those who receive these innovations have
01:10:05
always a negative reaction by
01:10:07
example when I published these calculations
01:10:10
on these these gases at two temperatures I have
01:10:13
sent this to a magazine called La
01:10:15
French Theoretical Mechanics Review
01:10:18
well it was the best in the field that
01:10:21
was given to an academician who
01:10:22
was called cabin and this cabin made
01:10:25
as a report this work reveals
01:10:28
deep ignorance in the
01:10:29
domain see and I almost got screwed
01:10:32
at the door of the CNRS ok so then at this
01:10:36
at that time there was a Russian who came
01:10:37
see me and he saw this work and he
01:10:40
had the opposite reaction he he said he
01:10:43
was called Louis KOF you solved a
01:10:45
problem on which me and my
01:10:47
collaborators stumbled for
01:10:48
many years and he said I ask
01:10:50
where is this going to be published I tell him
01:10:52
said I didn't inform the trouble
01:10:54
that I had with French so I gave him
01:10:56
took me I gave him the article he
01:10:58
published in Russia so 2 3 months later
01:11:01
it was published in Russian something from 17
01:11:03
page and at that time there was the
01:11:05
CNRS Commission which was to judge
01:11:07
my fate you know at the CNRS we begin
01:11:09
by having a position as an attaché
01:11:11
research which lasts 5 years then at the end of
01:11:12
5 years if we have we have we have not given you
01:11:15
a position if you have not been established
01:11:17
as a researcher you are screwed to
01:11:18
the door so there I was about to
01:11:21
get out the door
01:11:23
and the presiding officer of the session said
01:11:26
okay so now we're going
01:11:28
consult the file of a researcher that
01:11:30
people already know a certain
01:11:32
Jean-Pierre Petit, looking up at
01:11:34
heaven saying it's a pain in the ass
01:11:36
complete so I will read it to you
01:11:39
report of that
01:11:43
the expert did on his work and he
01:11:46
at this sentence and at that moment the
01:11:48
union representative had a packet of
01:11:51
paper and he says well listen to me I have a
01:11:52
another sound of the bell and he distributes to the
01:11:54
theft of copies of the Russian article and
01:11:57
its American translation into English
01:11:59
let's say the Russians the Americans
01:12:01
followed the Russian publications they
01:12:03
found it fascinating they
01:12:04
asked for permission to translate it
01:12:06
in other words I made a double which
01:12:08
was Russian and American and at this
01:12:11
chairman of the session says oh well that’s it
01:12:13
something new and indeed I
01:12:15
see that France has
01:12:18
brilliant theorists who are those
01:12:19
who want them to pass so that they
01:12:20
go load everyone raised their hands
01:12:22
hand I passed ricraac but you
01:12:24
know as they say felt the wind of
01:12:25
ball there is a wickedness there is a
01:12:28
malevolence but it's scary
01:12:30
why was cabin so aggressive
01:12:33
it's because he worked in the
01:12:34
same field as me and he had
01:12:36
nothing found, I had found something
01:12:38
thing then VO it's not the question that
01:12:39
it's Anglo-Saxon, not Anglo-Saxon, we don't
01:12:42
doesn't want the amateur to leave
01:12:44
taking away the bonus eh that's it then
01:12:46
after now I think it is necessary
01:12:48
give a little twist on cosmology
01:12:51
This is very important, it brings us to
01:12:53
beginning of the century that brings us to 1900
01:12:56
1902 and there at that time there were
01:13:00
progress made in mathematics
01:13:02
there are a few in France actually
01:13:04
but there are especially in Germany and
01:13:05
in Germany there is a town which
01:13:07
is called gotingen eh and sung by
01:13:10
Barbara gotingen VO and uh in this
01:13:13
city ​​you have a brilliant mathematician
01:13:15
whose name is Hilbert eh then you
01:13:18
have a whole population of people
01:13:20
extraordinary there is Einstein of course
01:13:22
there are schwarzil there are there are heaps
01:13:24
of people there are v extraordinary people and
01:13:26
at the time uh this new science
01:13:30
was being born between 1902 and
01:13:32
1930 was in Germany by the way uh
01:13:36
you know the researchers of this
01:13:37
time they were multilingual a type
01:13:40
did not only speak French or
01:13:42
German he spoke CIN or six languages
01:13:43
easy good then you had people
01:13:45
like edington in england which
01:13:47
understood the German Dirac it was
01:13:49
the same so let's say that if you didn't read
01:13:51
not fluent in German you were in
01:13:53
completely good game so all that has
01:13:56
given also it is necessary to explain something
01:13:58
something perhaps for people who
01:13:59
would have difficulty imagining the context
01:14:00
of the time the technological level
01:14:02
was not the same so for the
01:14:03
transmission of information there was
01:14:05
no Internet there was no uh I know
01:14:07
not photocopiers and so on
01:14:09
uh it was necessary to have access to
01:14:11
the information was much more
01:14:12
complicated so it was also necessary
01:14:14
let's say that the only vehicle
01:14:16
of information on a large scale it was
01:14:18
the book but not everyone published
01:14:20
not books or if people
01:14:21
made books it was in German
01:14:23
you understand then you don't have
01:14:24
what to buy the book by Monsieur hotel
01:14:26
you read German no well that’s it eh
01:14:28
and translating it was very complicated
01:14:30
so you had to be German and you
01:14:33
know very well that from the years
01:14:35
30 there were many Jews in
01:14:37
this gang the Nazis [ __ ] them up
01:14:39
outside saz there is an anecdote which is
01:14:41
funny enough rust was the minister of
01:14:44
the Search for Hitler and it was a
01:14:47
a convinced Nazi he even committed suicide
01:14:49
the end of the war or you surrender
01:14:51
counts and then rust arrives in gutingen
01:14:53
and he Hilbert was the the the president
01:14:57
from the university and he tells him professor
01:15:00
Hilbert does your university have
01:15:03
a lot of money from TP chif no no no he
01:15:06
didn't suffer didn't suffer no
01:15:09
no no she no longer exists that's all
01:15:12
it's true that in those years everything
01:15:14
suddenly everything is vaporized then
01:15:16
all that is
01:15:18
gone to
01:15:20
United States and England and then the
01:15:23
what's that like this broadcast?
01:15:25
scientific then it is very correct that
01:15:28
that you report this problem to me
01:15:31
when I started my job
01:15:33
researcher when I was doing a
01:15:34
publication the publisher sent me this
01:15:36
that we called offprints it's I
01:15:38
going about ten a dozen of
01:15:40
pages like that from separate edition
01:15:43
and I could send that to
01:15:45
colleagues but you realize
01:15:46
now we send a PDF and we can
01:15:49
send as many as you want 150
01:15:51
while I, when I had exhausted my
01:15:52
20 reprints are screwed and what is it?
01:15:54
what you are going to do you are not going to
01:15:55
take a photo of this with a little
01:15:58
camera pull it's not possible what
01:16:00
so afterwards when we wanted to make
01:16:02
things and that it can spread to you
01:16:05
NZ can't believe your eyes we were typing
01:16:07
machine on tracing papers
01:16:09
there was definitely ammonia
01:16:10
first name yes and then once we
01:16:12
had the sheets typed
01:16:14
then we drew the figures
01:16:15
the encrochine eh at that moment we
01:16:17
put it on the scent of leaves of
01:16:19
yellow paper and we insulated it with
01:16:22
ultraviolet or I don't know what one
01:16:23
something like that and once we had that we
01:16:25
took these yellow leaves we took them
01:16:27
put it in a cupboard and then we
01:16:28
poured some boniac, that was extraordina
01:16:30
nosedived and at that moment we
01:16:32
could see you realize but
01:16:35
that's how it happened
01:16:36
so now when we see that the
01:16:38
people they have the email address so he
01:16:41
there is also one thing which is that the
01:16:42
essential work done by the
01:16:44
Germans they have not been translated
01:16:47
before very late dates by I
01:16:49
found a very important job of a
01:16:51
German mathemedicine called
01:16:53
Ludic flame and 2nd inventor of the
01:16:56
flame surface and well its work has
01:16:59
was translated I believe in 2012 see 2 yes
01:17:04
2012 here is now cosmology
01:17:07
is mainly based on two works
01:17:10
two articles produced by one
01:17:11
mathemetician called schwarzild
01:17:14
and schwarzild you know there is a
01:17:16
thing that is repeated is that when there is
01:17:17
had the War of 1418 a lot of of of of
01:17:20
scientists who are German or
01:17:22
French or English they went
01:17:23
have the Guer killed
01:17:25
that's it and you have a mathematician
01:17:27
whose name is Werner boy Werner boy who
01:17:30
is a bit like the inventor of topology
01:17:33
what he found was something
01:17:34
extraordinary but he went
01:17:36
have him killed he died on the 15th
01:17:38
first days in a in a
01:17:39
decided what he committed to at 29 years old 3
01:17:43
months later he was dead it's all good
01:17:45
so schwar got involved also he had
01:17:48
I think two children he was 34 years old
01:17:51
but for the for the glory of
01:17:53
Germany and for the Kaiser it is
01:17:54
hired and he died of illness on
01:17:57
the Russian front the same but the thing is
01:18:00
that he had published in 1916 in January
01:18:05
a first article which was precisely
01:18:08
used by craftsmen
01:18:10
tronnoir and then made a second one
01:18:13
in February a month later and well
01:18:15
the first article was translated into
01:18:18
1975 and the second in
01:18:21
uh something like
01:18:24
989 or something like that you see then
01:18:28
that does one thing is that these
01:18:30
articlesl they exist in translation
01:18:32
English now but there are lots
01:18:35
of people who don't even know they exist
01:18:37
eh so I say the following thing
01:18:40
it is that when I read the works of
01:18:42
people of 1915 1916 I am faced with
01:18:45
insightful and intelligent people if and
01:18:48
This is mentioned in the comic strip
01:18:51
I'm talking about chcil's first article
01:18:53
especially the second in this second article
01:18:55
scharcil bluntly writes that when we have
01:18:59
a mass of matter like a
01:19:02
neutron star for example and that the
01:19:04
mass increases beyond a certain
01:19:06
areas the speed of light varies
01:19:08
you hear the speed of light
01:19:11
varies it is written in German in this
01:19:13
text but what notices a
01:19:15
similar thing in 1916 in other words in
01:19:18
1916 people had enough minds
01:19:22
free to consider such a thing
01:19:23
or now if you can take a
01:19:26
book which is 900 pages which is called
01:19:28
gravitation gravitation which is John
01:19:31
Willer from Thor and Bisner and well
01:19:36
when you read this
01:19:38
book there is [ __ ] but who
01:19:40
honestly beyond the imagination eh
01:19:43
you know the [ __ ] is
01:19:45
say bah when you go inside
01:19:47
of the black hole then you have
01:19:49
coordinates t is time and R is
01:19:51
the department well you know inside and
01:19:53
well it becomes radius and it becomes the
01:19:55
time but you hear something like that
01:19:57
I don't know but someone with common sense
01:19:59
is said but it goes well in your head
01:20:01
but it is written in black and white in the
01:20:03
Bouin Willer is the official thesis
01:20:05
people from black holes we want to
01:20:07
say but wake up guys
01:20:08
what happened then what
01:20:10
happened is that these concepts
01:20:13
cosmological it was necessary that
01:20:14
someone suddenly the f the les
01:20:18
broadcast then the first is Einstein
01:20:20
Einstein arrived in the 1930s
01:20:23
in the United States he gave he knows
01:20:25
conferences mainly on
01:20:27
west coast he gave several
01:20:29
conferences and there is a guy who was
01:20:31
particularly respectful to its
01:20:33
conferences it is Richard Tolman who
01:20:35
was already 50 years old at the time which was
01:20:37
a mathematician a physicist then him
01:20:39
he read German avment and he
01:20:41
discussed with Einstein he could not
01:20:44
make photos that didn't exist
01:20:45
not but maybe queinstein told him
01:20:47
past of of of offprints or a
01:20:49
something like that he had the material and
01:20:52
he wrote a book and this book and
01:20:54
released in 1934 so a book I have
01:20:58
I got a copy of it, 400 pages long.
01:21:00
has the mathematical bases there is everything
01:21:02
that we want the relative terest there it is
01:21:04
really well done so when a book
01:21:07
as it comes out it becomes the Bible
01:21:09
downright the reference and the book of
01:21:12
Tolman is definitely better
01:21:14
quality that the [ __ ] of who is called
01:21:16
Willer gravitation which is a
01:21:17
[ __ ] what good is the book
01:21:20
Toman is very good but in this book he
01:21:22
makes a mistake it happens he makes a mistake
01:21:25
error uh because he didn't understand
01:21:28
that when schwarzil releases his work
01:21:31
it uses a variable big R and big
01:21:34
R is not the radius and all of a sudden
01:21:37
the big R becomes the little r see all
01:21:39
suddenly someone says oh well I
01:21:40
I'm going to put little A and S when we
01:21:43
returns to the b of chtil it is the error which
01:21:45
screwed everyone up and being
01:21:47
given that this thing becomes the Bible and
01:21:49
well immediately all Americans
01:21:51
become proponents of
01:21:54
Tolman's work this error does not
01:21:57
summer
01:21:58
noticed no and then there is a type
01:22:01
who jumps in there too is
01:22:03
Robert Openenheimer and Robert Openenheer
01:22:06
he was a son of a family
01:22:08
rich enough he had means and he
01:22:11
first left to do a thesis
01:22:13
doctorate in Germany and
01:22:15
obviously openheimer read sanskrit
01:22:19
and he spoke German fluently
01:22:21
so there he understands everything he has seen
01:22:23
has a very brilliant mind that's for
01:22:25
that's what he invented for us, this beautiful
01:22:27
bomomic what and when he came back he
01:22:29
began to do work on
01:22:31
cosmology he published an article in
01:22:32
1939 and this article there you will read
01:22:35
everywhere that it is the founding article
01:22:37
black holes and there again there are
01:22:39
this little error that slips in
01:22:41
which no one pays attention to and then
01:22:43
so then there is war 3945 there
01:22:46
everyone is on the bomb but
01:22:48
it's the same openheimer was in the
01:22:50
manaton project but Tolman also all the
01:22:52
world mobilized all these people we were
01:22:54
mobilized or he is also Arté in the
01:22:55
manathon project so they were especially
01:22:58
interested in outdoor experiences
01:22:59
air like the atomic love that was
01:23:01
kind of all of a sudden
01:23:02
application of current theories pu
01:23:04
in the pres-gerre in 45 ben toman he
01:23:08
over 60 years old he died I think 67
01:23:10
years old he is already sick so it is
01:23:12
finished he comes out of there Einstein it's the same
01:23:16
I don't know what year he died
01:23:18
in the 50s he will be dead in 54
01:23:21
so it's fast
01:23:22
faital mer he had something other than
01:23:24
of doing cosmology he had enough
01:23:26
[ __ ] with the lawsuits we have against him
01:23:28
made because of the bombing you
01:23:29
know all that then what
01:23:31
happened and well there are people who
01:23:33
have recovered all that and the main
01:23:36
artisan in this matter is John
01:23:37
Willer and John Willer he says hey I
01:23:41
I'm going to do cosmology then with
01:23:44
his friends made a dream
01:23:46
and it's the black hole and then there was
01:23:49
mathematical contributions of
01:23:51
crucial of the contributions of the
01:23:55
and the chimera took shape with
01:23:59
successive errors which are
01:24:01
unimaginable that only the
01:24:03
mathematicians and it is there at this
01:24:05
that moment that we want to say but
01:24:07
these people who do cosmology they
01:24:10
have lost touch with math eh
01:24:13
and see there is one thing it's me
01:24:17
I didn't hang out with a lot of people because
01:24:19
perhaps I was quite unapproachable
01:24:20
I don't know but I worked with it
01:24:25
André Lichnerovitz academician and
01:24:27
mathematician who left a name in
01:24:29
maths eh then there was Bernard
01:24:33
Morin who died 2 or 3 years ago
01:24:35
was also a great mathematician
01:24:37
large-scale then obviously there
01:24:40
to Jean-Marie Sourot with whom I worked
01:24:43
20 years and then there is grotendck eh I
01:24:45
don't know if you've heard of
01:24:47
grotendic it's it's kind of guy
01:24:49
unimaginable gr was a
01:24:52
stateless is a name that sounds like
01:24:54
something Dutch I think
01:24:56
was Jewish anyway finally in patrid
01:24:58
his father had been an activist uh
01:25:01
what do we call it already it's n
01:25:04
not a communist he is uh ah there there
01:25:07
uh libertarian what yeah yes so he
01:25:11
came from a completely uh family
01:25:16
crazy and uh he he started to be
01:25:21
I was good at math, you know there
01:25:23
people like that do things
01:25:25
impossible as if we were talking
01:25:28
normally what then the French
01:25:30
are seen don was great and the
01:25:33
people said we should naturalize him
01:25:34
French eh but at this point
01:25:37
question is that to be naturalized
01:25:39
you had to do your military service
01:25:41
he didn't want to because he was
01:25:42
antimilitarist ah well yeah and I know
01:25:45
not even if he was naturalized perhaps
01:25:47
he was, if he was, it was without doing
01:25:49
his service and we made one
01:25:52
university professor but
01:25:54
as he was not French he could
01:25:56
not have a job
01:25:58
institutional but I had a good laugh
01:26:01
with you know how I knew
01:26:03
contendck it's not me who has it
01:26:05
contacted he was the one who contacted me
01:26:07
why because I was
01:26:09
incorruptible towards the army what
01:26:10
I mean that I propose to
01:26:12
working for the army the answer
01:26:13
would have been no that's all that's good
01:26:16
so we knew each other and I knew that he
01:26:20
he was hidden he was hidden in a
01:26:22
small village called Mormoiron
01:26:24
which is near carpentrass and
01:26:27
the time he was an ecologist before the
01:26:30
letter he made his bread he had a
01:26:32
four he had a big beard it's
01:26:34
extraordinary good I spent
01:26:36
delicious moments with this guy and he
01:26:38
gave me some tips
01:26:40
advice and all that then I
01:26:42
known this incredible number which is
01:26:45
sourriio siourriio is the enchanter
01:26:47
Merlin what I could see very well with
01:26:49
a pointy hat with stars like
01:26:51
that and SIO he's an extraordinary guy
01:26:55
he is a great mathematician and he is a
01:26:57
great physicist and this is the example
01:26:59
extremely rare of a type who was both
01:27:01
mat physicist there is no such thing
01:27:04
like this and
01:27:07
SIO he never learned a word
01:27:09
of English you
01:27:12
hear one of his daughters had married
01:27:14
an American whose name was not Marc
01:27:17
and when Marc came he said Mar
01:27:21
kitchen eat
01:27:24
not a word and why well I think
01:27:27
that there was a sort of a priori when
01:27:28
we questioned him he said but the
01:27:30
French is an interesting language
01:27:32
what and it's true that I
01:27:34
understand now I understand it
01:27:35
because look what happened
01:27:37
when science became
01:27:39
angloaxon well it's English has become
01:27:41
the dominant language eh ok now
01:27:44
if you don't speak English if you
01:27:45
don't read english you can't
01:27:47
being a scientist is everything and according to
01:27:48
you it is from what period
01:27:49
that there has been this change
01:27:51
after the war I believe I believe that
01:27:54
after the war then there were two things
01:27:56
which are generalized there was the
01:27:58
English language well it's true that it
01:28:00
there has to be a language, it’s
01:28:01
complicated because if we don't read the
01:28:04
Russian if you don't read German you have to
01:28:05
agree it could be anything
01:28:07
what Italian whatever they took
01:28:08
English ok but then there is
01:28:10
something that has become widespread and well
01:28:13
this is the examination of articles by
01:28:17
anonymous experts when you send
01:28:19
a paper is sent a referral you do not
01:28:21
you must not know who it is then we say
01:28:23
but this is to guarantee objectivity
01:28:26
of the re-eri as as it is anonymous
01:28:30
he can very well say it's [ __ ]
01:28:31
even though it's a friend or a neighbor
01:28:33
and all that good but what is there
01:28:35
serious if you want it's that uh that
01:28:38
leaves no prospect of response by
01:28:41
example me when I sent the article
01:28:43
to the mechanics review and that it is
01:28:45
came back with something that said this
01:28:48
work reveals my knowledge
01:28:49
deep enic gas what is
01:28:52
I could do I didn't even know that
01:28:54
it was this guy I went after you
01:28:55
see but I couldn't go see
01:28:58
cabin saying listen let's get down to business
01:29:00
table I will explain to you you have
01:29:01
he didn't understand anything, he didn't understand anything, it's
01:29:03
everything eh and what happens with
01:29:05
of love it's the same he didn't capture anything if
01:29:08
I was facing a blackboard but it
01:29:10
that I read and said what I ask you
01:29:12
it's a one-hour face-to-face meeting without
01:29:15
witness and without recording before a
01:29:18
table then we explain we are not going to
01:29:20
type on it but we send each other messages
01:29:22
equations what and there I win it has nothing
01:29:25
understood but it's crazy it's
01:29:27
cry something like that and then there is
01:29:30
no way to have that is to say that in
01:29:32
fact it was anonymous but how
01:29:34
made the selection because is it
01:29:35
that it was anonymous but we will say
01:29:36
independent or it was anonymous but which
01:29:39
which could be selected for
01:29:41
just do this then indeed
01:29:44
how does a review work?
01:29:46
scientific journal uh there is an editor
01:29:49
but above all there is an editorial
01:29:52
board there is an editorial board with
01:29:54
a certain number of people we can't
01:29:57
be a specialist in everything eh we can
01:29:59
not be very good at quantum mechanics
01:30:01
very good in astrophysics very good this
01:30:02
very good that so at that moment when
01:30:04
an article arrives the editor-in-chief says
01:30:07
Well, what discipline does that fall under?
01:30:09
ah well well listen it’s mechanics
01:30:11
quantum well well I will send it to a
01:30:12
such that's good but when it's due
01:30:15
Jean-Pierre Petit it’s catastrophic
01:30:17
because it doesn't fit into the
01:30:19
criteria then at that time by
01:30:21
example Icham fought with me with
01:30:24
German and Russian magazines there are
01:30:27
in 2023 we lost 6 months people don't
01:30:31
don't find a rephery ok eh and the
01:30:35
review said but listen we're sorry
01:30:36
we haven't found a reference that accepts
01:30:38
to examine his work then what is it
01:30:40
what does the researcher do who needs
01:30:42
to make a career he must publish you
01:30:44
know the dasage published on periche
01:30:46
so you have to publish so the guy says if
01:30:49
I'm sending this, we won't find a reference
01:30:51
I'm going to waste time otherwise
01:30:53
says you fit the mold and you have
01:30:56
a scientist called sabineel
01:30:59
Felder who is very well known because she
01:31:01
made I don't know 150 videos it's one
01:31:04
chief blogger and she made
01:31:06
recently a video where she talks about her
01:31:10
career and she says that now she
01:31:12
did more research a long time ago
01:31:14
she only does blogs and
01:31:16
then she does lessons by
01:31:17
match that's how he wins
01:31:18
his life but there is one thing is that
01:31:21
when you have a position to be in charge of
01:31:22
search at the CNS if we are not too
01:31:25
looking at his career we can be
01:31:27
free to do what we want while
01:31:29
that there are lots of places where that
01:31:30
does not even exist in Germany
01:31:32
example so in other words if we want
01:31:35
to be paid you must propose a project which
01:31:38
over 3 4 years eh and at that time if it
01:31:42
project is accepted then we will have a
01:31:44
post of this a post of that but
01:31:47
for a limited period and when it
01:31:48
talks about her career she tells
01:31:50
momentaman the only thing I had
01:31:51
found it was in Sweden so me
01:31:53
I was married I had a husband and a child
01:31:55
Germany and I had to go
01:31:57
do courses in Sweden then see
01:31:59
CNRS we are civil servants you go
01:32:02
count this freedom I can't
01:32:04
to be kicked out a lot ago
01:32:06
who take advantage of it by not giving a damn
01:32:08
great because if you don't do anything
01:32:10
we pose no problem but I would say
01:32:12
even though there are people who
01:32:14
would say above all, do not innovate above all
01:32:17
don't work, just talk
01:32:20
and your career will happen by itself
01:32:21
you show the rungs while at
01:32:23
contrary if you innovate you will
01:32:25
disturb here and a researcher is
01:32:27
necessarily disturbing you know me one
01:32:29
day I was summoned by the director
01:32:32
department of science
01:32:33
the engineer because my book had a
01:32:35
a bit
01:32:36
shaken created trouble good me I am
01:32:40
came to his house and he told me but it's
01:32:44
no need to defend yourself, no one
01:32:47
does not call into question your competence to
01:32:49
scientist tell why you have me
01:32:51
called but because I am attacked
01:32:53
from C phones the director
01:32:55
observatory which says it would be necessary
01:32:56
lock him up, so I said but
01:32:59
should I be locked up no no I
01:33:00
don't think no no and then he had this
01:33:02
sentence when I went out very nice
01:33:04
eh in conclusion you are a
01:33:07
non-standard finder you go
01:33:08
counts and then this extraordinary word
01:33:11
because a standard researcher is a
01:33:13
guy who finds nothing because be
01:33:16
standard that means we are going to turn
01:33:17
in circles currently in the world of
01:33:19
theoretical physics of cosmology and
01:33:21
cetera we must innovate he will find
01:33:24
extraordinary things look through
01:33:25
example quantum mechanics there is
01:33:27
something that people tried to
01:33:29
do me I am convinced that that
01:33:31
space time is discrete you see this
01:33:33
What I mean is that when you
01:33:34
take the space there you have one
01:33:36
quantity which is called the length of
01:33:38
hideout at 10 x 33 cm that means that we
01:33:41
can't cut it cut in half and
01:33:43
well when you take a chess game the
01:33:45
chess game it has h columns and and
01:33:48
OK, you're not going to ask the question.
01:33:50
what is between such box and
01:33:52
such box it doesn't make sense see
01:33:55
chess we go from B4 to B5 that's all
01:33:59
eh we don't go from B4 to B45 that's no problem
01:34:02
meaning eh and then time too
01:34:04
it's something discreet how
01:34:06
of time lasts a sudden you arrive in
01:34:08
a chess club saying there you go
01:34:09
I am a physicist I pose shadow of
01:34:11
questions so first what is he
01:34:13
there are between square D7 and square des8 the
01:34:16
people will say what is he talking about then
01:34:18
so when you play how long
01:34:20
lasts a while it doesn't make sense eh there is
01:34:23
the before and after well you have
01:34:25
two characteristic quantities
01:34:28
hideout length and time
01:34:29
hideout which means you don't
01:34:31
cannot envisage phenomena which
01:34:34
take place over times less than
01:34:36
this hideout time which means that
01:34:38
It is
01:34:39
discreet take for example look at a
01:34:41
movie when you watch a movie on
01:34:44
show well you know it is
01:34:45
discreet you know you are 24
01:34:47
frame second and between the 24th and the 25th
01:34:51
iséam well there is ass jump but there
01:34:53
has nothing between the two HMs so you have
01:34:56
an impression of continuity but it is
01:34:57
because precisely there is
01:34:58
reptinian persistence so you see
01:35:01
then imagine that space-time is
01:35:03
discrete it is a jump equivalent to this
01:35:07
that Fr Einstein the guy who will find that
01:35:09
will be the new Einstein but he will
01:35:12
we need to consider saying that
01:35:15
researchers but you will have to
01:35:16
jump forward as you take a step
01:35:19
forward it works no more we can
01:35:22
plusir stand actually like you said
01:35:24
yes exactly be non standard if
01:35:26
you are standard we are screwed because
01:35:28
that the standard doesn't work
01:35:30
currently the classic model is
01:35:32
lambda CDM is the standard model and
01:35:35
the standard model no longer works then
01:35:37
if the standard model no longer works
01:35:39
we tried to patch it up in
01:35:41
the 70s with dark matter
01:35:44
after we added the dark matter
01:35:46
dark energy after we added the
01:35:48
let's flatter you realize it's
01:35:50
really as if we were putting
01:35:52
patches on a room in Aire it's
01:35:53
scary what but are you
01:35:55
think that this current situation makes
01:35:58
lower the general level of researchers
01:36:00
even for example in the West in France
01:36:03
or in the United States
01:36:05
or we can we can consider
01:36:06
that there are still good charcheurs but
01:36:07
which would perhaps be restrained once
01:36:09
that they want to publish their work but
01:36:10
do you think there can be
01:36:11
have also here with this this this mode of
01:36:13
thought could there even be
01:36:14
makes a drop in the general level according to
01:36:16
you well you know there is one thing
01:36:18
it's that
01:36:21
uh if a good researcher is someone
01:36:25
who says, here I am, I have worked out something
01:36:28
but maybe a guy would come along
01:36:29
saying it's not bad what you have
01:36:30
done but it's completely different
01:36:32
I will show you everything you
01:36:34
do it is a thing of the past imagine
01:36:36
for example someone who says good model
01:36:37
genus is not bad but in fact you
01:36:39
forgetting this or that thing is not
01:36:41
this is how we should see things
01:36:42
wonderful that would mean there is
01:36:44
something new that is
01:36:46
what people do is hold on
01:36:47
to what they did it's all a man
01:36:50
like love he worked on
01:36:52
[ __ ] that is string theory
01:36:54
well there is nothing we can say since
01:36:56
It doesn't work but it had prices
01:36:59
like the Janus price €700,000 at once
01:37:01
see at a scientific price it is covered
01:37:03
CNRS medal prizes and all that
01:37:05
for work on the waves
01:37:07
gravitational gold in the model
01:37:09
Janus the gravitational SEZs do not
01:37:11
don't work the same way it's
01:37:13
not done yet but when it's done
01:37:15
and well the works of Monsieur d'amour
01:37:17
they will go to the Gille to paper you
01:37:19
realize and then currently
01:37:21
imagine a cosmologist
01:37:22
astrophysicist would come to see me
01:37:24
saying listen to me I am open to
01:37:25
new ideas uh what you propose
01:37:28
what's left of my work ah
01:37:30
well and there it's nothing well yes if he has
01:37:32
worked on dark matter on
01:37:34
dark energy on it's scary you
01:37:36
you realize but look at it
01:37:38
theoretical physics we have a a
01:37:41
academician whose name I believe is
01:37:43
Pierre Fillet returned to the Academy
01:37:45
of Sciences for his noted work
01:37:47
on the futino then the futino is a
01:37:50
hypothetical particle that we never have
01:37:53
find
01:37:55
OK so that's his claim to fame.
01:37:58
for having invented something that cannot be found
01:37:59
no it's annoying what you're doing
01:38:01
counts and but then
01:38:03
then the thing is that like I
01:38:07
told you I had a very good
01:38:09
ech with the mathematicians why with the
01:38:11
math people because they are people who have
01:38:13
rules eh when you're a good one
01:38:15
chess player you can be Jewish
01:38:18
black anything homosexual if you
01:38:20
play chess well that’s all eh
01:38:22
so you put a label and you play
01:38:25
and if you ask to enter a
01:38:27
club to make a deal with people that
01:38:30
will work whereas in physics it is not
01:38:32
at all that they lost completely
01:38:34
all sense of reality I quote a
01:38:37
example of unimaginable work is
01:38:40
an article that appeared 2 years ago
01:38:42
in monly notice where the authors
01:38:45
suggest that dark matter
01:38:48
could be made of darkino
01:38:50
you hear the darkino Dark that means
01:38:53
say its in english so now
01:38:56
when you want to create something
01:38:58
you create a word for example there is the
01:39:00
inflation theory well what is it
01:39:02
Well, it’s due to inflation and
01:39:04
let's inflate, what is that, well, that's what
01:39:05
makes inflation and currently if you
01:39:08
you find out there is as much theory
01:39:10
of the inflaton which AB researcher that no
01:39:12
meaning that's why I said
01:39:14
in
01:39:15
video know it's very curious this
01:39:17
phenomenon because we find it
01:39:18
today on a societal level by
01:39:20
example on other subjects but
01:39:21
like for example the subject W with the
01:39:24
theories of gen that is this reasoning
01:39:25
circular where we invent a new word
01:39:27
and where in fact it only works in
01:39:29
circular reasoning which does not
01:39:30
of meaning and which applied that has
01:39:32
catastrophic consequences for all
01:39:33
a company there we have the example with the
01:39:35
famous gen theory for example it is
01:39:37
it's curious to see a phenomenon
01:39:38
apply like that in an environment
01:39:40
clearly scientific where normally
01:39:41
we are supposed to practice it every day
01:39:44
fara turns scientists well and
01:39:47
only towards them so it's not very
01:39:49
easy because these people have a
01:39:51
special language how to say al
01:39:54
see in the Middle Ages when we wanted
01:39:55
publish a work you had to speak the
01:39:57
Latin is pretty much the same i.e.
01:39:59
that for
01:40:00
me convert my ideas my works of
01:40:03
physical and purely engaging
01:40:06
mathematically it is a bit equivalent to
01:40:08
write it in Latin they have a way of
01:40:10
say things but at least it's
01:40:12
solid at least we have people you know
01:40:15
mathematicians have one thing uh
01:40:18
they can say that a job is
01:40:20
interesting or not interesting that's it
01:40:21
subjective but they are completely in
01:40:24
able to say if it is true or if it is
01:40:26
false if it works or if it doesn't work
01:40:28
see because they have there are
01:40:30
ways to do it is like a
01:40:31
computer program you have a
01:40:33
computer language you believe you
01:40:34
have done computer science you write
01:40:36
a program this program it works or
01:40:38
it doesn't work there is vocabulary there is
01:40:41
a syntax there is a language if you
01:40:43
respect everything it turns out if you
01:40:45
don't respect it's syntax error
01:40:47
that's it for math that's it
01:40:48
the same if you put a math thing
01:40:50
who is kidding we will answer you syntax
01:40:52
terror in physics is not that at all
01:40:54
in physics we are in the
01:40:56
subjective what people will tell you I have
01:40:59
the impression that it is false then what
01:41:01
what happens is that the paper has put
01:41:02
of love on his HES page but everything
01:41:05
everyone refers to it everyone refers to it
01:41:07
refer it is illegible it's crazy this
01:41:09
article no one reads it then in
01:41:12
october
01:41:13
2023 October 2, 2022 Françoise combe
01:41:17
academician vice-president of
01:41:19
the Academy of Sciences comes to make a
01:41:21
conference in Marseille well there is a
01:41:23
guy in the room who tells him but
01:41:25
why do you never talk about the model
01:41:26
genus she answers it's not worth it
01:41:28
of love showed that it doesn't work it's
01:41:30
everything and Luminet wrote in his book
01:41:34
a scientist in whom I have everything
01:41:36
confidence showed that it didn't work
01:41:37
he doesn't even dare to say the love you have
01:41:40
all these people all these people when
01:41:42
we answer them no it doesn't work it's
01:41:44
extraordinary and there is no way to
01:41:46
speak in seminars but even at
01:41:49
limit you even know how to speak in a
01:41:51
seminar would that work then
01:41:54
I had allies at the Academy of
01:41:56
Sciences the main thing was schnit
01:41:59
who helped me while he was there he
01:42:01
without him I don't know what I would be
01:42:03
became let's say that actually when
01:42:05
I was really in
01:42:07
perdition in my laboratory I have it
01:42:09
met one day on the terrace of a
01:42:11
coffee I showed him what I was doing
01:42:13
he said to himself hey he's not stupid then
01:42:15
he got me out of there but if you knew
01:42:19
I was in a laboratory run by
01:42:21
a guy called valinc prof i
01:42:23
it was an eigrier it was the time of
01:42:26
mandarins let's say that this guy they
01:42:28
had the power of life or death over
01:42:30
researchers it's scary and
01:42:33
uh al I will simply mention one
01:42:36
little episode of this thing like that
01:42:38
so see when I entered
01:42:40
this in this lab uh the goal
01:42:43
actually was trying to do
01:42:44
one one MHD generator with two
01:42:47
temperature so I built a
01:42:49
quite complicated machine I made
01:42:51
quite complicated calculations and it worked
01:42:53
on the first try that is to say that these
01:42:56
generators should not produce
01:42:57
current that at 10,000 degrees we had lowered
01:43:00
the temperature at 6000 P it produced
01:43:02
currents and I remember it is
01:43:03
dead now I had a colleague who
01:43:04
was called lesakis who told me it's not
01:43:07
possible I say if if then how
01:43:10
how can you check a
01:43:11
similar thing well you see we're going to put 2
01:43:13
% of gas carbon gas he will have nothing left
01:43:15
why because carbon dioxide goes
01:43:17
cool the electrons finally me
01:43:18
I had a mastery of the thing I knew
01:43:19
what I did it worked let's say
01:43:22
that everything was done during the morning
01:43:24
between 9 a.m. and noon we had done
01:43:27
4 C experiments it was over finished good
01:43:30
and that was a thunderclap
01:43:33
international I mean it was
01:43:36
the first time someone arrived
01:43:38
to master the stability of velikov eh
01:43:41
that's why the Russians are
01:43:43
came to hold a conference in Marseille
01:43:45
but what did my boss do
01:43:47
he said to himself oh but that’s my
01:43:48
invention of mine because everything that
01:43:50
was in the laboratory it is appropriate
01:43:51
there's no problem eh ok then
01:43:54
uh I remember one year he hired
01:43:58
to Switzerland who was to be my director
01:44:02
because I was a little researcher
01:44:04
I was a research so I see
01:44:07
one day there came this guy who had a
01:44:08
beautiful white BMW car that was
01:44:10
returned to the CNRS as director of
01:44:12
really looking for he had a salary
01:44:14
double me and he was coming for me
01:44:16
lead and at that moment when I saw
01:44:19
When this guy arrived, I spoke a little
01:44:22
little work he understood nothing he
01:44:25
understood nothing so he left and
01:44:27
valass tells me on the phone so you
01:44:30
have made contact with Mr.
01:44:31
pike says yes but why do you
01:44:34
invite people who don't understand anything
01:44:36
I can't do anything with him, he doesn't understand
01:44:37
what I'm doing it's true that it was
01:44:38
this story is quite complicated
01:44:40
space at this dimension it was not
01:44:42
easy then Valenis said this contract
01:44:45
brings us a lot of money, it's
01:44:47
true that it was definitely the third
01:44:48
of the laboratory budget therefore so small
01:44:52
goes on strike we're screwed so he has
01:44:54
removed pike but then I worked
01:44:58
with a wonderful boy who was a
01:45:00
technician who was called berelei in
01:45:02
[ __ ]
01:45:03
and who was underpaid as it's not
01:45:06
possible I think it
01:45:08
had 700 € per month something like that
01:45:10
it's scary there and he had a
01:45:13
fantastic talent this boy he is finished
01:45:16
by hell what and when he left
01:45:19
in military service valass told me
01:45:22
your arm it's not moving forward I'm going to put
01:45:25
more competent people and he put
01:45:28
in the TR lab what types have these are
01:45:31
appropriated my laboratory and he told me
01:45:33
you are a theorist are going to do your
01:45:35
calculations on the first floor and I am
01:45:38
left without defending myself and then there it is
01:45:41
weird all the same because I'm quite
01:45:42
comattive why am I not
01:45:44
not defended well because I had
01:45:46
calculated that we would never go down
01:45:47
below 4000 degrees and actually for them
01:45:50
that's the idea it was it made it work
01:45:52
generator at 10000°gr then at
01:45:54
6000 then to 4000 if it is 1500 then
01:45:58
there is an industrial El Dorado it is
01:46:00
extraordinary generators which
01:46:02
had 60% exra yield so it
01:46:04
were dreaming about all this and
01:46:06
I knew it didn't work and then
01:46:09
that's where I started making
01:46:10
matths to cut me that's all good
01:46:12
so uh they put the guys in my
01:46:15
lab and I recounted that in the video
01:46:17
will people see small ones?
01:46:20
images to explain this to them let's say that
01:46:22
they made my machine work
01:46:24
and they made a mistake and doing
01:46:26
a mistake they destroyed an organ
01:46:28
very delicate inside it worked
01:46:31
he didn't realize it then
01:46:33
this organ was a square tube like
01:46:35
that which took part of the gas and the
01:46:38
overpressure had transformed him into an angel
01:46:40
clarinet you see what it is
01:46:41
clarinet angel something we like
01:46:43
that and then I told my
01:46:45
technician on the phone they had to do
01:46:47
an fA or there it is by he was doing
01:46:50
music but he did more
01:46:51
no electricity at all
01:46:53
so it lasted for months, I missed them
01:46:55
down there saying [ __ ] [ __ ] [ __ ] and
01:46:58
so it lasts like that for 3 or 6
01:47:01
month and after 6 months the
01:47:04
director decides to have a meeting on
01:47:06
Saturday morning with these guys and me
01:47:10
eve I come into the lab at night
01:47:13
with a key I open the room and I
01:47:16
demonstrate the ugly part I dismantle
01:47:18
the clarinet and the Reunion it was
01:47:21
the next day, a Saturday morning at 9 a.m. me
01:47:23
I arrive at 8am I hide in the cabin
01:47:25
from the projectionist and through the little hole
01:47:28
then I see velassie who says you
01:47:30
told me you'd make it work
01:47:32
small machine but I see one thing
01:47:35
it's that since you occupied it
01:47:36
no longer works at all and produces nothing
01:47:38
every little one made a long N
01:47:40
like that and I go down with that
01:47:43
a jute bag and I take the angel out
01:47:45
clarinet I put it on the table
01:47:47
the world understands and I wish them
01:47:49
have a good weekend so they really realize
01:47:51
that they had made a mistake
01:47:53
on Monday the director calls me
01:47:55
saying hello I invite you to lunch ah
01:47:58
OK, so he invites me to lunch, we meet
01:48:00
finds everything with an icy silence
01:48:03
and then he said to me I would like to know
01:48:06
how do you envision the campaign?
01:48:08
experimental back to school B I say to myself
01:48:11
I am a theorist Mr. Director
01:48:13
it's no longer my area so he answers me
01:48:17
either you accept or you will not have
01:48:18
never your thesis eh okay I him
01:48:22
answer Paris naked and there he got up he
01:48:25
spilled his drink he went to pay
01:48:26
there it was, it was a lot of tension
01:48:29
well then ok then there was this
01:48:31
international conference in Marseille and
01:48:34
I decided not to come so I
01:48:36
sent a medical CCAT that I had a d
01:48:39
of wisdom here then vikov arrived
01:48:42
and they made fun of him
01:48:44
saying but where is Monsieur petier he
01:48:46
does secret work no no no no
01:48:49
he has he has a wisdom g problem ah
01:48:51
said vikov there wisdom or wisdom he
01:48:54
everyone knows what
01:48:56
so after that he flew into a rage
01:48:58
terrible and he sent a report to the
01:49:00
CNRS saying that I had to be [ __ ]
01:49:02
the door because I was working more
01:49:04
I didn't do anything anymore ok no joke
01:49:06
so people are aware of this
01:49:08
something he says or there it must be Barner for you
01:49:10
and in fact I remember one
01:49:13
dialogue with the secretary of
01:49:16
director oh mister little you go
01:49:18
make Mr. Director die
01:49:21
yesterday he called the cen
01:49:23
people told him yes we sent the
01:49:25
Queel report asked me I received one
01:49:27
thing saying if you don't justify
01:49:29
of activity you are kicked out
01:49:30
within within 15 days what
01:49:33
And
01:49:35
yes then well she says well he sent
01:49:37
this thesis what thesis it is not big
01:49:41
so well it's a thesis there are plenty
01:49:43
of calculations ah or but there are only
01:49:44
calculations and he had this sentence
01:49:46
extraordinary I have a comic book
01:49:49
also which is not printed but which
01:49:50
people will be able to download one day
01:49:52
he told me your work has no
01:49:54
interest outside of interest
01:49:55
scientific you hear magical
01:49:58
how can we have a type
01:49:59
who runs a C laboratory with a
01:50:01
similar sentence
01:50:03
then the CS manager says yes but
01:50:06
there is a letter from lirovic which says that
01:50:08
it's not bad so it got me out
01:50:11
I was taken out of this laboratory
01:50:13
like that with pinettes for me
01:50:14
put elsewhere
01:50:15
quiz you realize la la la
01:50:18
tyranny al it was tyranny but
01:50:20
now it's something else, these are the
01:50:22
Paron of science who defend their
01:50:25
precarious, what are the academicians?
01:50:27
so in C since when according to you here it is
01:50:32
academicians have this organization
01:50:34
and this influence which is in
01:50:35
the occurrence seems to be
01:50:37
negative, I think that it exists
01:50:41
long time but you know you have to read
01:50:43
uh uh reviews on the Academy of
01:50:47
Sciences uh
01:50:50
time in the 18th century there are things
01:50:54
extraordinary there are there are
01:50:55
settling scores as an academician
01:50:57
because there was nothing
01:50:59
secret we didn't do things of
01:51:01
anonymously for example at one time
01:51:04
there is there is a law of electricity which
01:51:08
is called the Biot law and savar therefore Biot
01:51:10
was an academician and then there was a
01:51:13
academician whose name I forget who
01:51:15
left a name in history too
01:51:17
as a politician and at one time organic
01:51:21
present at work
01:51:23
and the other says to him you're swollen it's
01:51:26
something I explained to you ago
01:51:27
at 15 days and Biot does not rebel and
01:51:32
at this moment the other sends
01:51:34
people on a column of a church because
01:51:37
that he had explained to her by writing
01:51:39
the equations by scratching them on the
01:51:41
column what there were
01:51:43
settling scores as an academician
01:51:45
really a glove, no, but there
01:51:48
had an academic life then
01:51:50
that now the Academy of Sciences
01:51:52
but it is a country it is a landscape which
01:51:54
is dead you know the Academy of
01:51:56
Sciences changed its statutes ago
01:51:59
ten years and the word which comes back to
01:52:02
that moment commonly is the word
01:52:04
communication you know now we have
01:52:06
the more politicians we have people
01:52:08
who communicates when all of a sudden
01:52:10
people made decisions and its fair
01:52:13
well when we criticize them they say
01:52:15
that they didn't communicate enough and he
01:52:16
start communicating again we communicate
01:52:18
we are in a world of
01:52:20
communication the same there is more
01:52:24
communication these are front mills
01:52:26
but what exactly has changed?
01:52:27
in the statutes there is there is a
01:52:29
decade
01:52:31
well the interest was focused on the
01:52:34
communication for example there is a
01:52:36
thing is that in these academies there
01:52:38
does not have a permanent secretary but
01:52:41
perpetual secretaries and these
01:52:43
perpetual secretaries are supposed to be
01:52:45
a little bit about science judges eh and
01:52:48
having a conflict with love I
01:52:51
addressed to Etien who is a mathematician and
01:52:55
surveyor perpetual secretary therefore who
01:52:57
is perfectly capable of understanding
01:52:59
what I did and to such an extent that it
01:53:01
even won a scientific prize
01:53:04
to love being a board member
01:53:07
scientist so I write to him he tells me
01:53:09
doesn't answer then last year I did
01:53:11
got on the phone I told him I had you
01:53:14
wrote but you didn't answer me oh
01:53:15
yes I get so many good things
01:53:17
okay then I'll talk to him about it
01:53:19
situation I read say can I
01:53:21
come to see you
01:53:23
to tell you about the mathematical basics
01:53:25
of the genus model his answer he told me I
01:53:28
I have absolutely no time, I said.
01:53:31
but what are you doing and well
01:53:33
accounting and management
01:53:35
financial, but he dared me
01:53:38
answer that then above all he did that
01:53:40
and he also does communication
01:53:42
don't stop giving lectures
01:53:44
woman like Françoise combe when she
01:53:47
will die we will ask ourselves but what is
01:53:48
that she had found what did she
01:53:50
left on the other hand videos there are some
01:53:52
everywhere she is everywhere HM here are these
01:53:56
people there are talking, talking, it’s chat
01:53:58
what is it all then before it was
01:54:01
different but above all how to say
01:54:05
uh there was a time when at the Academy
01:54:08
of sciences there were 2 thirds of
01:54:11
people who were going to leave their name in
01:54:12
in the history of science you
01:54:14
understand there was but it was the same
01:54:17
in all countries look for example
01:54:18
in England when there was a guy
01:54:19
like Maxwell you heard about
01:54:20
of Maxwell's equations it is
01:54:22
incredible Maxwell it's a bit
01:54:23
instein for electromagnetismo Bou
01:54:27
people all of a sudden they bring
01:54:28
things like that it's something
01:54:30
fantastic Navier equations
01:54:32
stock for fluid mechanics good
01:54:34
now you want to say
01:54:36
but give me a name what's going on
01:54:39
stay nobody we are not going to talk about
01:54:41
model of love there is no model
01:54:43
of love there is
01:54:45
nothing they just sing
01:54:47
general relativity they do it for the 10th time
01:54:51
at a conference to explain how
01:54:52
general relativity was born but a
01:54:54
times is enough 10 times is too much
01:54:57
so it's the same in all countries
01:54:59
it's the same in all countries and because
01:55:01
that physics is in crisis you
01:55:04
hear then but can we
01:55:06
to say that she is uh in crisis everywhere
01:55:08
in the world where can we see
01:55:10
in the same way as when we analyze
01:55:12
the one on a plane really here it is
01:55:13
economic geopolitics we see that there
01:55:15
has two blocks that start to split
01:55:17
with a block, that's how they say it
01:55:18
Western bloc and a bloc that we can
01:55:20
call more and more here are the bricks
01:55:21
plus can we actually see a
01:55:24
increase in the quality of research and
01:55:26
science in countries including
01:55:27
like China or maybe Russia or
01:55:29
other countries or do you think
01:55:31
there is really uh here is one
01:55:32
general slowdown you know
01:55:34
know it depends on what we have
01:55:36
means by scientific activity uh there
01:55:38
I'm talking about theoretical science eh I
01:55:40
don't talk about experimental science
01:55:42
uh it is obvious that in terms of
01:55:44
technology it never stopped
01:55:47
eh all we could do was there
01:55:49
has a constant progression for example
01:55:51
with respect to the instruments
01:55:53
observation of astronomy it was
01:55:55
completely
01:55:56
phenomenalin now we use
01:55:59
several telescopes we combine their
01:56:00
images we arrive at when you see
01:56:03
we arrive at seeing the image of a
01:56:06
fly scratching on the moon
01:56:07
see it's good now look
01:56:09
for example this company
01:56:12
completely crazy about measuring waves
01:56:15
gravitational eh that gave the
01:56:18
installations called LIGO and
01:56:19
Virgo good and well here are some
01:56:22
installations that react to
01:56:25
variations in length which are a
01:56:27
fraction of an atom it's it's
01:56:30
phenomenal, I was talking about it with my friend
01:56:32
Mony which is precisely very focused on these
01:56:34
storiesl progress on
01:56:36
scientific techniques are
01:56:39
amazing everything we did with it
01:56:41
lasers everything we did with lasers
01:56:42
stuff like that is great
01:56:43
against regarding the fundamental that
01:56:46
It’s a disaster, for example
01:56:48
in the 70s we created uh we
01:56:51
tried to enrich the model with
01:56:54
particles and we called them super
01:56:56
particles then there was the
01:56:58
neutralino who was the little brother of
01:57:00
neutron there was the fotino which is the
01:57:02
little brother of the photon and there was the
01:57:04
selectron who was the little brother and
01:57:06
we have not observed these particles
01:57:08
while the accelerators had
01:57:10
totally the power needed
01:57:13
the only thing we could in principle
01:57:14
highlight this is what we
01:57:16
calls the hiig boson and currently
01:57:18
I don't know if you've heard of it
01:57:20
of that but there is
01:57:22
a project to extend the accelerator
01:57:25
circle instead of making dozens of
01:57:27
kilometers it will be hundreds of
01:57:29
kilometers it will cost a fortune and
01:57:31
there uh
01:57:33
en Sabine ausen Felder was right to
01:57:37
say but aren't we trying to
01:57:39
waste people's money
01:57:40
imagine that because they are going
01:57:43
increase throttle power on
01:57:44
will find something no you
01:57:46
find nothing because it's not you
01:57:48
don't look in the right place it's in
01:57:49
your head that you have to find things
01:57:51
but but according to you why why
01:57:53
there is this difference at this point
01:57:56
on these two areas normally is it
01:57:58
that it should not necessarily be
01:57:59
must follow together or
01:58:01
less create a
01:58:04
limits the famous fundamentals like
01:58:06
you say there is a slowdown see
01:58:09
in fact a blockage shouldn't be there for us
01:58:10
prevent from continuing to develop
01:58:13
develop ourselves to achieve certain
01:58:14
works and if not the other question too
01:58:15
According to you, what makes
01:58:17
it can have this phenomenon on a
01:58:18
world plan I find it really very
01:58:21
astonishing global that it is global
01:58:23
then we can say there is one thing if
01:58:25
it doesn't work like that it's what there is
01:58:26
a train we didn't take we missed one
01:58:28
train you see he and this train is
01:58:30
1902 is the topology and it is the
01:58:35
work that you can explain as
01:58:37
me who would not be at all
01:58:39
trained on the subject well yes
01:58:43
so how do you say it's something
01:58:45
big ones tell me if it's 1902
01:58:47
why but because there is
01:58:51
the era of G like Werner boy like Ve
01:58:56
like how she
01:58:58
the bottle of CL is called Klein
01:59:01
the bottle of
01:59:02
CL no no wait I'll tell you
01:59:05
show one I have one here you go
01:59:06
see it's funny to be able to tell you
01:59:10
amen a bottle of CL is a one
01:59:13
amateur who made this
01:59:14
United States who sent here, go ahead
01:59:18
and and in the meantime so I'm going to do
01:59:20
a few reminders really don't hesitate
01:59:22
obviously to put your thumbs up to comment
01:59:24
and also to look at the links which may have
01:59:25
be posted which serves as a description
01:59:26
for the comic strip by Jeanpierre petit Modelle
01:59:29
gus black consciousness so you see this
01:59:32
that it’s just a bottle ah yes that yes
01:59:33
okay I see ok yes that's it yes there
01:59:35
decl bottle so it's funny because
01:59:37
that we go in there and this
01:59:40
bottle has neither front nor back
01:59:42
fact there is there is a liquid
01:59:44
inside but it is there without being there therefore
01:59:47
this was invented by Kin bon and this
01:59:50
this concept is extremely important
01:59:52
then indeed I can say but
01:59:53
what does it give it gives
01:59:55
slightly insolid objects like that
01:59:56
do you know have you heard of the ribbon?
01:59:58
from mbus also he R or or yes
02:00:02
well that's it's not just some
02:00:05
mathematical cunning they are
02:00:07
fundamental tools that we do not use
02:00:09
not in physics we missed out
02:00:12
completely and the Janus model its basis
02:00:16
is topological then obviously if there
02:00:20
has people who say but what is that?
02:00:21
top
02:00:22
I obviously have a comic book.
02:00:24
on this which is called topologic con
02:00:28
it's true that this comic book there
02:00:30
there is no equation there is no poop
02:00:32
there are no things there are
02:00:34
just drawings but what I put
02:00:38
in exerg it is not recommended to read
02:00:40
this comic the evening before
02:00:43
falling asleep after a meal that is too rich or
02:00:46
when we are sure of nothing when it is not
02:00:47
frag burn things
02:00:49
see okay here it is and but but I
02:00:53
think it's one of the best and
02:00:55
this comic but it's the only one
02:00:58
global document that explains the
02:01:00
topology there are no others there
02:01:04
and how to say there are concepts
02:01:07
in there ouch ouch
02:01:10
ouch I'm trying to mention that a little in the
02:01:12
band it's not easy see for example
02:01:15
uh so I repeat he for those who
02:01:18
maybe haven't heard the tape
02:01:19
desess you're talking about he's the
02:01:21
stupid topology the stupid topology which
02:01:23
although we can still find
02:01:25
what directly on your website
02:01:27
on the Sans Frontière website
02:01:30
is translated into 35 languages ​​but you
02:01:32
know there's something funny I'm going
02:01:33
telling you an anecdote is enough
02:01:35
funny one day I'm going uh to Russia
02:01:38
with a journalist from the magazine
02:01:41
Now I don't know how to do it anymore
02:01:42
what was it called and
02:01:44
uh the plane is having problems and we are
02:01:48
obliged to settle in Germany so we
02:01:49
technical problem arises in Germany
02:01:51
and the airline accommodates us at
02:01:53
the hotel and at that moment we arrive in
02:01:56
a nice qure or C star hotel, well there you go
02:01:59
and when we arrive there is uh guy
02:02:02
cap in front and he sees me coming
02:02:06
because we went there with the
02:02:07
surface of Boy that I had built and
02:02:10
the guy says hello to me mister little
02:02:13
so my journalist friend but
02:02:16
how does he actually know this guy?
02:02:18
it was a student who did who
02:02:20
earned money as a receptionist
02:02:22
in at the hotel see but I
02:02:26
reminds me of this surface that I had
02:02:28
built I went to the department
02:02:29
of mathematics from Berkley and
02:02:32
Berkley Mathematics Department
02:02:33
it looks like a huge cube then there is a
02:02:35
courtyard in the center and in the center I posed
02:02:38
my my surface as we put this for
02:02:42
catch the fish what the
02:02:45
mathematicians arrived in oh he
02:02:47
are good there but this thingl
02:02:52
it's the universe is designed like that see
02:02:55
if we wanted to summarize the geometry of
02:02:59
of the ganus model it is the covering of a
02:03:03
kind of hyper surface from Boy to C
02:03:07
dimensions then there is also a thing
02:03:10
but how do I all at once
02:03:12
suddenly I was contaminated by this kind of
02:03:14
thing well one year a guy told me
02:03:18
there is a mathematician who comes
02:03:20
give a lecture to ex and he would have
02:03:22
need some drawings made for him
02:03:24
say ok I draw quite a bit I'm going to do
02:03:26
that's good and this guy is blind
02:03:29
his name is Bernard Morin, he has been there since he was
02:03:31
5 years old good and he asks me to
02:03:34
draw something so I still
02:03:37
see clearly in space I take the
02:03:39
mark i
02:03:41
draw and then after the 45th drawing I
02:03:44
starting to see the wires touching each other
02:03:46
downright and I end up putting it down
02:03:49
mark by saying there I can't do it anymore
02:03:52
and he laughed so the next day I
02:03:55
I'm going to see him, but who are you?
02:03:56
you who put me in perdition because
02:03:58
that even when I was in
02:03:59
special mathematics when the teacher
02:04:02
gave the geometry problem
02:04:04
I managed to build the surface in
02:04:06
my head I could clearly see the
02:04:08
things but then really he he
02:04:09
saw clearly better than me and he
02:04:11
said but it's the the the the model of
02:04:15
reversal of the sphere you
02:04:16
realize what it is to return a
02:04:17
sphere that means what is it you
02:04:19
take a sphere it is by by
02:04:22
example blue red outside and and
02:04:25
green inside good and then this
02:04:28
sphere you give him the possibility of
02:04:30
cross yourself like that but without making
02:04:31
well you can return it
02:04:34
scary it's completely an so this
02:04:36
who's funny I think it's him
02:04:38
must mention the aspect of
02:04:41
bibliotics there is a mathematician
02:04:44
American who had the medelf
02:04:46
so in this area and he he has
02:04:50
mathematically demonstrated that it was
02:04:51
feasible and his teacher his boss
02:04:54
told him but it's just that you're an idiot
02:04:56
you realize if your theorem
02:04:58
stick to it that means we can
02:04:59
return a sphere do you
02:05:01
know how to do it no I don't know but
02:05:03
I know it's doable so here you go
02:05:04
that’s where it’s extraordinary it’s
02:05:06
that the mathematician arrives at
02:05:08
plan something without without without
02:05:10
having it in hand is extraordinary eh
02:05:12
that's it and at that moment people put
02:05:14
10 years of understanding how it worked
02:05:16
and Morin was one of those guys and I
02:05:20
say uh I didn't do it but what
02:05:22
what I could have done is take
02:05:23
aspirin preventively by going
02:05:25
see because what gave gift
02:05:28
such a headache and it's true
02:05:29
that I made loads of videos
02:05:30
on that and I told
02:05:33
reader rest from time to time
02:05:36
because it gets hot and when you
02:05:39
will have assimilated these things you will
02:05:42
connection corrections
02:05:44
neurons that will change you will
02:05:46
don't think the same way, I'm coming
02:05:48
to to think in three dimensions to 4
02:05:52
dimensions to 5 dimensions to 6 dimensions
02:05:54
I can do it in my head I
02:05:55
learned that with a hand that is blind
02:05:57
blind saw better than sighted people
02:06:01
that amused him anyway, so for
02:06:02
it was funny for him to explain everything
02:06:05
these things and seeing people suffer
02:06:07
like unfortunate people then but I will have
02:06:10
I have two questions to ask you
02:06:11
because you were talking about a train
02:06:14
that we missed so when you talk about
02:06:16
the topology in 1902 is but already
02:06:18
in fact what could he have done
02:06:19
that we that we are missing exactly uh what
02:06:22
this train especially when we see with
02:06:25
all the subjects there that you address uh
02:06:27
which can sound B afterwards obviously
02:06:28
as I have no skills in the
02:06:30
domain I listen but it seems in
02:06:32
in any case it seems very logical what
02:06:33
you say or at least you seem
02:06:35
you have a lot of elements to
02:06:37
bring and the other is uh everything
02:06:39
simply there you also speak
02:06:42
personally from your meetings with
02:06:44
certain people ultimately who
02:06:45
transmitted certain knowledge but
02:06:47
are there more people like you
02:06:49
including in France, can we
02:06:50
say that uh something that could
02:06:52
bring some optimism given
02:06:54
that we were talking about earlier
02:06:55
academicians are there other
02:06:57
Jean-Pierre Petit is there uh
02:06:59
many young researchers who
02:07:01
would be more uh that is to say in fact
02:07:04
some of the scientists you know no
02:07:06
standard finally who have a thought no
02:07:07
standard does he have any
02:07:10
I'm going to tell you one, it's
02:07:12
Icham zjel he understood perfectly and
02:07:15
see understand topology things
02:07:18
it requires a way of thinking
02:07:20
completely different
02:07:22
there is for example the first time that
02:07:25
I gave a conference it must be at
02:07:27
the end of the 70s at the Institute of
02:07:31
bururivette on precisely this surface
02:07:34
fantastic boy so weird it's
02:07:38
like a canary cage and birds
02:07:40
are both inside and outside
02:07:42
example it's like for example me I
02:07:44
have fun drinking whiskey with a
02:07:46
bottle of air conditioning quite paradoxical what B
02:07:49
and uh I had if you if you
02:07:53
download the Topologicon you
02:07:56
find a cutting to build
02:07:59
the object then for example imagine that
02:08:01
I'll explain to you it's a sphere
02:08:03
and I only have plans of my own
02:08:05
layout well I'm going to make a cube
02:08:07
see I can very well make one
02:08:08
cutting you go up you have the one
02:08:10
box well you see the sphere it is
02:08:12
like that except that it's round good benah
02:08:14
there you construct a surface of Boy with
02:08:16
angles like that and well I thought
02:08:20
found with one fit full they
02:08:22
were 70 80 all in the 50
02:08:25
sixty of mathematicians
02:08:26
experienced and they were there with
02:08:29
scissor cutting things out and
02:08:32
there was an English mathematician
02:08:33
back of the room saying but it's
02:08:35
extraordinary you made them
02:08:37
regressed I was like a professor of
02:08:39
19th century with college students what the
02:08:42
guy who does the dictation while saying the
02:08:43
sheep spent and me i i
02:08:47
I walked there was a wooden floor
02:08:49
which creaked I said well well they
02:08:51
were all there like kids what and
02:08:53
then there is the great specialist of
02:08:55
topology which understands nothing it is there it
02:08:57
gets angry but I don't understand and he
02:08:59
his secretary he says no calm down I
02:09:01
I'm going to show I have to put that
02:09:03
on this so in other words there are
02:09:05
people who know how to write these things
02:09:07
don't know how to visualize and then in there
02:09:11
there was a completely astonishing guy
02:09:13
who was Werner boy he died in 1902
02:09:15
in 1914 he was killed and so boy
02:09:18
had not science died
02:09:20
changed completely then that's enough
02:09:23
funny because there is an article from
02:09:25
Boy from 1902 it has never been translated into
02:09:29
no language that
02:09:30
German at the moment I don't know if
02:09:32
someone is trying to
02:09:33
translate because it's not easy to
02:09:35
translate math but this article
02:09:38
it is fundamental it has never been
02:09:40
translated then there are illustrations
02:09:43
and these illustrations are the same as
02:09:44
in an article that I wrote myself
02:09:47
50 years later yes so therefore the
02:09:50
diagnosis we missed the topology and
02:09:53
missed the topology the topology it
02:09:55
will have implications for cosmology
02:09:58
eh and then also on physics
02:10:00
particles and in my opinion if we
02:10:02
crap at this point on the physics of
02:10:04
particles is that something is missing
02:10:06
thing that's all but you know it's
02:10:10
exactly the crisis that was looming at
02:10:13
the dawn of the century
02:10:15
1900
02:10:16
remember what it was called
02:10:18
great English scientist who I forget
02:10:20
the name that said now we have
02:10:22
equations all that remains is to put
02:10:25
numbers the comma see he he av
02:10:28
that they had a hold on you
02:10:30
realize it is true that the
02:10:31
fluid mechanics had been
02:10:33
systematized the mechanics
02:10:37
ballistics celestial mechanics
02:10:39
also we have a hold above all and then
02:10:42
suddenly the mechanics arrived
02:10:43
quantum is extraordinary then the
02:10:46
quantum mechanics here are the people for
02:10:49
say but what is it and well
02:10:50
it's the failure of common sense you
02:10:53
hear what I'm telling you bankruptcy of the
02:10:54
common sense because mechanics
02:10:58
quantum predicts things that are
02:10:59
absurd, we are in surrealism
02:11:02
complete when you shoot an electron it
02:11:05
there are two slots and it goes to the
02:11:07
times by the de fantes so you know
02:11:11
how to say we are in absurdity
02:11:13
more total look at the PL paradox therefore
02:11:17
when we are faced with the absurd we say to ourselves
02:11:19
but there if my common sense does not arrive
02:11:22
not for me to conclude what is happening
02:11:25
if for example I say but what will
02:11:26
happen I'm going to say stupid things bah
02:11:29
the conclusion is to calculate there is
02:11:31
nothing to see H in other words calculate this
02:11:34
that you predict by calculation is more
02:11:36
consistent with the observation that what
02:11:39
you imagine in your head it's
02:11:41
extraordinary then we are faced with
02:11:43
the need for upheaval
02:11:46
major scientist and me what
02:11:48
I bring into cosmology it's only one
02:11:50
low part look for example uh
02:11:53
quantum mechanics is not my thing
02:11:55
department eh I know a little bit about it
02:11:57
but I don't like talking about the things I
02:11:59
not completely mastered it's not the
02:12:01
hardly good on the other hand which is a very good
02:12:03
reflex to have I think a lot of
02:12:05
people will many people should
02:12:06
try to have this reflex there well yes ah
02:12:09
yes no but I have many people who
02:12:11
talk about anything good and and
02:12:14
how to say when you open a book
02:12:17
of TH quantum fields and well we
02:12:20
can go find a ch called
02:12:21
space and time inversion oh it's
02:12:24
interesting because
02:12:25
you see clearly that Janus
02:12:28
it is time that reversesspace that
02:12:29
reverses and all that doesn't work
02:12:31
to reverse things and there inversion
02:12:34
of space and time B ago
02:12:35
actually operators who
02:12:36
allow you to reverse time
02:12:38
operators that allow you to invert
02:12:39
space and so on we call them P and T
02:12:42
then we see one thing is that the
02:12:44
operators they can be written from
02:12:45
two different ways they can be
02:12:48
linear and unitary or antilinear
02:12:51
anti-unitarian and that's where we read ben
02:12:53
it absolutely has to be like that
02:12:55
otherwise there would be energy states
02:12:57
negative
02:12:58
ah interesting then for example
02:13:00
the space operator must be
02:13:02
unitary linear good but the operator
02:13:05
of time it must be antilinear
02:13:07
and anti-unitarian so at that moment I
02:13:09
I said to myself but why is this
02:13:11
that we don't try the other version it's
02:13:13
true there are people who say but
02:13:15
how do you get ideas
02:13:17
like that well listen it's very simple
02:13:18
you pick up a science book and
02:13:20
you verasonable that means
02:13:22
reasonable eh that is to say
02:13:24
reasonably we can think that or
02:13:27
looking for assumption means
02:13:28
suppose then in other words it is
02:13:32
reasonable what happens if I
02:13:33
I'm not reasonable, what's going on?
02:13:35
pass if I do the opposite and well
02:13:37
research ideas you have 10
02:13:39
in each book simply be
02:13:41
reasonable try to think
02:13:43
otherwise and that I believe that
02:13:45
word ch very good it's thinking outside
02:13:48
from the box but you see in in
02:13:51
the 50s there is a journalist
02:13:53
scientist who released a book that
02:13:55
It's called sleepwalker Arthur Kusler
02:13:58
tells you nothing no and the theme of its
02:14:01
book it's scientists are a
02:14:03
little like sleepwalkers they advance
02:14:06
your like that and then sometimes
02:14:09
scientist engages in a gallery
02:14:10
and sometimes he found a bunch of
02:14:13
things but at a certain point it's
02:14:15
a dead end and he remains in this dead end
02:14:17
without realizing that on the right
02:14:19
there is a voice that opens see and me
02:14:22
I compared it to a maze you go
02:14:24
imagined a maze then people
02:14:27
circulate in this labyrinth sometimes
02:14:28
even he goes around in circles and everything
02:14:30
suddenly you climb onto the labyrinth
02:14:32
and when you step on the maze
02:14:34
you see this and this is what happened
02:14:36
in ISAM Ilam it is mounted on the wall and
02:14:39
afterwards when he looks at the others he
02:14:41
but how do they manage to
02:14:42
to persist in this thing that turns
02:14:44
in a ring
02:14:47
HM so the thing is that so that the
02:14:51
science shifts so that it changes it
02:14:54
new ideas are needed and in
02:14:55
new ideas well there is a sorting there
02:14:58
necessarily has eccentric ideas which
02:15:00
don't work, it's not because the
02:15:02
people say I can explain everything
02:15:05
it holds up but with the system
02:15:07
Currently we no longer have the chance to see the
02:15:11
new ideas appear see because
02:15:13
in the past academicians could
02:15:15
publish notes to the counter-report
02:15:17
it was they who chose and when
02:15:19
he published C notes he has one that held
02:15:21
standing and four who couldn't stand
02:15:23
but there was C there was not this
02:15:25
filter now it's
02:15:27
finished then when when you have a
02:15:30
idiot because he's an idiot
02:15:32
of love is a fool who finds the
02:15:34
way to put this article on it
02:15:36
was convinced a month or two ago he
02:15:38
was at a dinner someone told him
02:15:40
asked what do you think of the model
02:15:42
Jean-Pierre Petit he responded very
02:15:44
tense I showed him that it wasn't
02:15:46
standing but he didn't show me anything at all
02:15:49
I would have liked to say well listen we're going
02:15:50
go to the next room there is a blackboard
02:15:52
let's explain, it's incredible
02:15:54
but how sad we are
02:15:57
to waste time then I would have
02:16:00
several questions for you to ask yourself
02:16:03
dear Jean-Pierre so I can already tell you
02:16:05
let you really express yourself
02:16:07
because I see you are passing on
02:16:08
full of but it's really let's go
02:16:10
for the questions so I say to myself let's
02:16:13
soon arrive at a sort of small
02:16:15
break where I will ask Jean-Maxime
02:16:16
Cornelius to come because it's good
02:16:18
anyway Jean-Maxime Corneil who told me
02:16:19
allowed to contact you to come
02:16:21
so I think he will have some
02:16:23
questions to ask yourself but so there
02:16:24
had a donation that was made during
02:16:27
during this interview so I
02:16:28
me there is a question that asked you
02:16:30
if you don't mind answering
02:16:32
because it was I was waiting too
02:16:33
so that we can address this a little
02:16:35
theme there it's quite simple it's
02:16:37
do you think quantum mechanics
02:16:39
in that is to say in the infinitely small
02:16:41
can explain certain mysteries of
02:16:43
cosmos such as dark matter sorry
02:16:45
so ask the question again I understand it
02:16:47
a question from Maurice who asked us
02:16:49
makes a donation and who says so do you think
02:16:50
that quantum mechanics infinitely
02:16:52
small can explain some mysteries
02:16:54
of the cosmos such as dark matter
02:16:56
dark matter is a component
02:17:00
hypothetical of the cosmos which has a
02:17:02
very specific function which is to hold
02:17:04
galaxies so they don't explode
02:17:07
well we don't have a model
02:17:09
dark matter is not mechanics
02:17:11
quantum which will bring us a
02:17:12
answer you see that's all eh
02:17:15
quantum mechanics has nothing to do with
02:17:17
there is no there is no identity and
02:17:21
and in fact what was extraordinary
02:17:22
it’s that we have this dark matter
02:17:24
searched in mines we searched for it
02:17:26
in tunnels because you have to
02:17:27
protect from cosmic radiation then
02:17:29
there is a Frenchman who works in the
02:17:31
Monsen tunnel and I remember there
02:17:34
at 5 6 years old he had he had been in
02:17:37
a video he said uh how it goes
02:17:39
25 years that we are looking for we must no longer be
02:17:42
far then you imagine a guy who
02:17:45
was searching in a mine
02:17:47
of salt to find uranium by
02:17:48
example there is no uranium my old man
02:17:50
you keep dying it's crazy and uh
02:17:53
there is there is an Italian who she is
02:17:55
under montsasso the montsasso tunnel
02:17:58
because you have to have 2000 m of de of
02:18:01
rock above her head and she
02:18:02
said
02:18:03
uh sometimes we wonder if we
02:18:06
is not looking for what
02:18:07
something that exists you don't realize
02:18:09
the disaster of having spent 20 years
02:18:11
his life 40 years of his life looking for a
02:18:13
something that doesn't exist and that's not it
02:18:15
quantum mechanics which brought you
02:18:17
the answer the answer is that
02:18:18
does not exist HM h I responded to the
02:18:22
question I think and well thank you thank you
02:18:23
a lot for this answer so uh in
02:18:26
anyway what I what I'm going to do
02:18:28
we're going to get there soon
02:18:31
in any case a little conclusion there for
02:18:32
this interview I would really like
02:18:33
to be able to welcome Jean-Maxime
02:18:35
Corney who in my opinion might want
02:18:37
broach a subject uh with you and like
02:18:41
obviously it was he who allowed me
02:18:42
also to get in touch with you
02:18:43
it's normal that I leave my friend
02:18:44
be able to come but in any case
02:18:46
I would like to make some reminders
02:18:48
obviously so we were able to talk at the same time
02:18:50
so the comics uh we presented everything
02:18:52
on time i.e. genicus model
02:18:54
against black science as you can
02:18:55
order we will also put the link in
02:18:57
description uh which allows you to
02:18:59
support the work as we have it
02:19:00
explained uh so there certainly we had the
02:19:02
right to a real discussion
02:19:04
exciting but you have to remember
02:19:05
that there is a subject uh much more
02:19:08
annoying and sad energy that was addressed
02:19:11
it's the fact that you can't
02:19:12
in fact express yourself freely above all
02:19:15
on scientific journals there is a
02:19:16
rejection from your fathers on on
02:19:19
your work that you are obliged to
02:19:21
rent rooms yourself to do
02:19:22
conferences so don't hesitate
02:19:24
obviously to consult the links which have
02:19:26
been posted in the chat or which will be
02:19:28
put in description so obviously this
02:19:30
show you like, do not hesitate to
02:19:32
say to react in a comment to put a
02:19:33
maximum P to increase the
02:19:35
visibility but above all to support the
02:19:37
times the work of Jean-Pierre
02:19:39
Small but also from Ham zel who was
02:19:42
cited uh at a time if you have any
02:19:45
knowledge and therefore wish to
02:19:47
go a little further on the
02:19:48
synthesis work provided by uh
02:19:50
so Mr. Zéeli if not even for
02:19:53
support this person who
02:19:54
also therefore going through a period which is
02:19:56
is not at all pleasant and affects
02:19:59
strongly in my opinion its daily and
02:20:01
potentially even the moral and
02:20:03
cetera and you know I would fight
02:20:05
so he can do research
02:20:08
I would do anything unfortunately
02:20:10
what I am obliged to tell you is
02:20:11
that the only perspectives that
02:20:13
I see it's outside France in
02:20:15
France it's not possible it will be
02:20:17
perhaps Morocco will perhaps be the
02:20:19
United Arab Emirates it might be
02:20:21
something like that and it won't be
02:20:23
France is still terrible, it’s
02:20:25
tragic even you know Icham it's a
02:20:28
French Moroccan but he is French by
02:20:30
heart there is no problem I had
02:20:32
on the phone a Frenchman
02:20:35
Franco-Algerian scientist who is
02:20:37
left to work in the iraet and who said
02:20:39
I am immersed in French culture
02:20:41
I left France with a torn heart
02:20:44
because I couldn't give a damn
02:20:46
France you realize h but it's
02:20:49
monstrous something like that while
02:20:51
one could say but you understand
02:20:52
we don't have the means but what
02:20:54
that it is a research position it is
02:20:55
nothing something like that how we
02:20:57
can refuse something like that I
02:20:59
sure something like that even I'm 87 years old
02:21:02
I will see it there will be a scandal
02:21:03
monstrous one day we will say but all that
02:21:06
has been developed you know that for the
02:21:07
imag this is what happened with the
02:21:09
Russians you know that it is they who have
02:21:10
makes hypersonic missiles or eh
02:21:12
that's it, well that's it then obviously it's
02:21:14
It's all a bit secret but it's
02:21:17
that's that's exactly it HM uh in
02:21:21
in any case uh Jean-Pierre is it
02:21:23
that there is something other than
02:21:24
we could add to uh support
02:21:27
uh your work or especially maybe
02:21:29
here you help as much as possible in the face of this
02:21:31
problematic - there because obviously
02:21:32
so you do many
02:21:33
conferences you allow your work
02:21:35
to be accessible either free of charge or
02:21:37
otherwise to be able to support you too
02:21:38
financially because you are
02:21:39
obliged, for example, to rent rooms
02:21:41
that's what we could say simply
02:21:42
be able to express yourself and moreover in the face of
02:21:43
uh people who are they
02:21:45
also scientists uh is it
02:21:47
there are other ways uh something
02:21:50
what do you like to say to our spectators who
02:21:52
would like to be able to support you
02:21:54
know honestly I don't know what to say
02:21:56
because for example when I did
02:21:57
this conference in Paris I found
02:22:00
so shocking that we have to
02:22:01
payerin B when I got there that
02:22:04
gave us €3,000 in fees when
02:22:07
I put a cardboard box for
02:22:08
put money people put 10 € there
02:22:10
there was 300 €. by the way it costs 300
02:22:13
€ and we have 200 it costs €3000 we have €300
02:22:17
of Don then there are people who said
02:22:19
but we will try to do something to
02:22:20
raise money I'm shocked I
02:22:23
said I don't want to do anymore
02:22:24
conferences I want you to do
02:22:26
pressure on the university to
02:22:28
welcomes me, it's not normal
02:22:30
example currently the thing that I
02:22:32
would like to do is introduce Janus to
02:22:35
the Academy of Sciences and there I
02:22:37
tried to mobilize Cédric Vilani I
02:22:40
couldn't get it on the phone I have it I
02:22:42
worked it worked I told him
02:22:44
but I'm not asking you to
02:22:46
support the Janus model but I
02:22:48
asks to be able to present it he
02:22:52
deflated this guy is a draft
02:22:54
but why do you think uh he s s
02:22:56
swollen because there I would have a me
02:22:58
I have one last question for you
02:22:59
ask before bringing in I explain
02:23:01
let me ask you this because
02:23:02
that once again I don't know
02:23:03
necessarily all your work your routes
02:23:05
and I saw questions that can
02:23:06
be recurring uh it seems
02:23:09
that some wonder if the does
02:23:12
that you are ostracized and marketinalized
02:23:14
even in fact that you have so many
02:23:15
problems maybe because of some
02:23:18
of your work or in any case uh of of
02:23:20
your comments on notions of oven
02:23:22
uupology then I saw a term that
02:23:24
which I did not follow but which is called
02:23:26
Umi Umi et cetera so excuse me if I
02:23:28
pronounce it wrong but do you think
02:23:30
not that apparently it could be
02:23:31
because of things other than the common
02:23:34
finally that certain people of the
02:23:35
scientific community decides about you
02:23:37
put aside because of things that
02:23:39
have nothing to do with the genus model
02:23:40
I mean and that has always been
02:23:42
all the time al you know well
02:23:44
look at Galileo who was obliged
02:23:46
to abjure he said that the earth moved
02:23:49
but it was not possible there is
02:23:51
always a moment when we have arcana
02:23:53
in science who are
02:23:55
untouchables for example Galileo had
02:23:59
a vision of the cosmos which contradicted
02:24:01
sees writings well there it's the same
02:24:04
I say things that
02:24:05
contradict the scriptures but
02:24:07
do you think it would be by
02:24:08
example this subject which could
02:24:10
explain to this point which is so much
02:24:13
researchers or personalities who are
02:24:15
linked to the world of research which
02:24:18
can have this kind of reaction
02:24:19
towards you because for me that's what
02:24:21
still seems to me
02:24:22
mind-blowing very you know you know
02:24:25
I did this cosmology work but
02:24:27
I also have a book called the
02:24:29
metaphysicon if you want
02:24:30
eventually we can talk about it because
02:24:32
that this is also a contribution of
02:24:34
for my part, that doesn't have much to do with
02:24:37
cosmology but it’s dizzying
02:24:39
because it's a kind of theory of
02:24:41
belief eh and there it all rests
02:24:44
on a bisoroid object that I
02:24:46
show there you know that and that well
02:24:48
it is a monohedron it is a poly which has no
02:24:51
only one side as it only has one
02:24:53
side he only has one stop that's it
02:24:55
the topology is good topology
02:24:57
it's you have to touch it this thing it's
02:25:00
it's really funny what that's good and
02:25:01
well that destabilizes people who
02:25:05
are believers, religions do not mean
02:25:07
say that the world is material
02:25:09
contrary I say the opposite I say
02:25:12
we have a material world and a world
02:25:14
immaterial yes so what is it
02:25:15
that you are you are the guru of a
02:25:17
new religion no I'm not the
02:25:18
guru I just give tools
02:25:21
intellectuals to reflect on your
02:25:22
beliefs and well I had threats of
02:25:24
death of Israeli fundamentalists outright
02:25:27
you hear okay we'll come from
02:25:31
to hide well yes they are afraid of where
02:25:32
the parallel you made
02:25:33
historical with for example Galileo ah

Description:

Explorez la vie et les travaux de Jean-Pierre Petit, astrophysicien français renommé et auteur, dont les théories audacieuses ont souvent défié les conventions scientifiques. Lors de cet entretien plongez dans l'univers de cet éminent chercheur, qui a brillé par ses contributions significatives en magnétohydrodynamique et en cosmologie avec son célèbre modèle Janus. Ce modèle propose une nouvelle approche de l'univers en suggérant l'existence de matière négative et positive, remettant en question les paradigmes traditionnels comme la matière noire et l'énergie sombre. Jean-Pierre Petit est également reconnu pour ses efforts de vulgarisation scientifique, transformant des concepts complexes en informations accessibles à tous à travers des livres et des bandes dessinées. Toutefois, ses propositions non conventionnelles lui ont valu un rejet total de la part de la communauté scientifique en France, allant de la marginalisation académique, des interdiction de publication et même une impossibilité de s'exprimer, le forçant à louer lui-même des salles de conférences. Cet entretien offre un regard en profondeur sur ses défis professionnels, notamment ses difficultés à publier dans des revues scientifiques de renom et l'isolement professionnel qu'il a pu ressentir. La classification de certaines de ses théories en tant que pseudoscience, sans arguments sur le fond par ses détracteurs académiciens notamment, souligne également les obstacles rencontrés par ceux qui osent remettre en question les normes établies. ❤️ Recevez la nouvelle REVUE mensuelle directement dans votre boite aux lettres : https://fr.geopolitique-profonde.com/lettre-confidentielle-commande2 ⚔ SOUTENEZ vos émissions #GPTV avec un DON pour nous aider dans le combat : https://fr.geopolitique-profonde.com/don 😒 Saviez-vous que 45,2% d'entre vous ne sont toujours pas abonnés à notre YouTube ? Essayez c'est gratuit ! ➡️ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwAS7bowP5S5P44eP_f7W0Q?sub_confirmation=1 👀 [Formation Anti CBDC Gratuite] "Reprenez le Contrôle de Votre Épargne" : https://fr.geopolitique-profonde.com/anti-crise-d1d7ad6e-71adc34c ☎️ Prenez rdv pour vos solutions patrimoniales : https://calendly.com/d/dsf-8g6-6qk/appel-de-mentoring-equipe-geopolitique-profonde 🌍 Le site internet Géopolitique Profonde : https://geopolitique-profonde.com/ Lien vers la BD « Modèle Janus versus science noire » : https://www.helloasso.com/associations/support-au-modele-cosmologique-janus/boutiques/modele-janus-contre-science-noire Lien vers le livre d’Hicham : https://www.amazon.fr/dp/2959189302 Lien vers la conférence de Paris : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCgvmunzftc Lien vers la conférence de Pertuis : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Fw_bvjRgg0 Lettre recommandée de Damour : http://www.jp-petit.org/papers/cosmo/2019-Damour-lettre.jpg Le site : https://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ LES RÉSEAUX SOCIAUX ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Twitter : https://bit.ly/3O70wLk Discord : https://discord.com/invite/ZDsDTnfhBq Telegram : https://t.me/GPTVoff Instagram : https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Whatsapp : https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ LES CHAPITRES DE LA VIDÉO ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 00:00:00 Introduction 00:04:05 Les 'Brazil files' et la liberté d'expression 00:06:06 Achat de Twitter par Elon Musk et censure au Brésil 00:11:00 Alexandre de Moraes et la politique brésilienne 00:17:20 Mécanismes de censure et implications mondiales 00:25:05 Entretien avec Jean-Pierre Petit 00:46:00 Rejet académique du modèle Janus 00:47:00 Diffamation scientifique 00:52:00 Conférences et réception du public 00:56:08 Soutien et impact des travaux de Petit 01:05:01 Début dans la MHD 01:07:04 Reconnaissance et obstacles 01:08:01 Innovations et interférences militaires 01:12:01 Difficultés de publication et reconnaissance internationale 01:15:00 Évolution de la diffusion scientifique 01:20:01 Cosmologie et erreurs conceptuelles 01:27:21 L'impact de la langue sur la science 01:30:01 Les défis de la publication scientifique 01:35:01 La nécessité d'innovation en science 01:48:51 Les difficultés académiques 01:55:01 La crise de la physique 02:00:02 La topologie et la science 02:11:34 Le besoin de changement scientifique 02:16:00 Les défis de la publication scientifique 02:21:02 La recherche hors de France 02:27:00 Soutenir Jean-Pierre Petit 02:31:37 L'histoire de la science et du fanatisme 02:33:05 La sélection des élites et le conformisme 02:37:00 Les défis de la publication scientifique 02:45:00 La marginalisation et la politique scientifique 02:51:30 Censure et perte de documents 02:53:00 Diffusion du savoir 02:55:00 Anecdotes personnelles 03:00:00 Expériences internationales 03:06:00 Obstacles académiques 03:08:00 Réflexions sur la religion et la politique 03:13:20 Conflits géopolitiques actuels 03:16:00 Diplomatie et guerres 03:19:00 Armes et conflits 03:24:07 Impact de la guerre sur la société 03:31:13 Accusations de corruption 03:32:20 Réaction à la trahison 03:33:01 Conclusion Musique intro : _Mozart - Lacrimosa (From the Requiem Mass in D Minor), Licence achetée à Leo Symphony Orchestra, Numéro de la piste : 424634 _Cether - Requiem drill feat Mozart

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "MODÈLE JANUS, GÉNIE FRANÇAIS ET MAFIA SCIENTIFIQUE | JEAN-PIERRE PETIT | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.