Download "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV"

"videoThumbnail 12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

12월 26일 서정욱의 뉴스라이브. 오후 4시10분에 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

12월 26일 서정욱의 뉴스라이브. 오후 4시10분에 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

Channel: 멸콩TV

1월 5일 오후 4:30분 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 송국건 기자님과 대담으로 생방송 진행합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

1월 5일 오후 4:30분 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 송국건 기자님과 대담으로 생방송 진행합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

Channel: 멸콩TV

1월 2일 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 오후 5시에 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

1월 2일 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 오후 5시에 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV

Channel: 멸콩TV

멸콩

멸콩TV

멸콩티비

멸콩tv

멸공

멸공티비

멸공tv

멸공TV

서정욱

서정욱변호사

바로보기

김신애의 인물책

인물책

서정욱 이봉규

이봉규TV

고성국TV

가로세로연구소

이재명

서정욱 이재명

애국보수

보수우파

우파방송

뽀빠이

이상용

뽀빠이이상용

뽀빠이가간다

김지진

구자룡

구자룡 변호사

00:00:00

[Music]

00:00:16

Hello, Melkong TV viewers.

00:00:18

Today, we are talking about the superstar of the legal profession,

00:00:23

Lee Jae-myeong, the sniper. And now,

00:00:26

this is lawyer Koo Ja-ryong, the number one recruit to the people.

00:00:30

First, let's talk about my two legal issues.

00:00:33

First, now we will preview the

00:00:36

four trials of Lee Jae-myeong. On that Monday, when

00:00:39

Song Young-gil and Yoo Chang-won were being reviewed, the

00:00:42

prosecution deliberately chose Yoo Chang-won. Let's take a look at the

00:00:45

legal issue to see what the reason is.

00:00:48

Then, as an issue for the Democratic Party, the new

00:00:52

academic party and the day, a person of

00:00:55

democratization merit, Yeyu, were snatched up to

00:00:58

adjust the security rights. Pass this issue, then

00:01:04

look at the world of the Democratic Party, which nominates criminals who tortured and killed criminals, and

00:01:07

lastly, considering the public's will,

00:01:11

who should be the chairman of the emergency committee chairman's election committee?

00:01:14

And how should Minister Jay Han Dong-hoon be

00:01:16

utilized? Next,

00:01:18

what should Representative Kim Ki-heon do? Let's look at

00:01:21

this issue.

00:01:24

Mr. Lawyer, it

00:01:30

is so difficult for Lee Jae-myung's sniper to hold Lee Jae-myung's trial before the general election. The election law in Daejeon-dong

00:01:33

is difficult. In fact, since the trial in Daejang-dong lasts several years, there is no

00:01:38

situation in which to bring this up before the general election. It wasn't, so people are

00:01:45

very curious about whether or not the perjury teacher can come out before the general election. Speaking as a lawyer,

00:01:49

you know, this case is not going to last long.

00:01:51

So if it's normal, it's

00:01:54

natural that it will come out before the general election, but I also said it

00:01:57

on other broadcasts. That's right, but they said that if just a

00:01:59

few tricks were used,

00:02:00

the possibility of going back to April would be very high, and sure

00:02:03

enough, I said, "Please

00:02:05

see what kind of tricks appear. I

00:02:08

said it would be good if you could make a political evaluation based on that, but

00:02:10

two tricks have already been used. What did they

00:02:12

include? Attorney." I replaced him once, and

00:02:14

no, in such an important case,

00:02:17

there is no such thing as replacing the lawyer at the beginning of the case.

00:02:20

And even among the general public,

00:02:25

if you are a person who can appoint an additional lawyer, you already paid the fee once when hiring a lawyer.

00:02:30

Usually, you have to pay the fee again. Then, the

00:02:32

existing lawyer will be left as is.

00:02:34

So, it will take the form of additional appointment, but

00:02:38

since it will be completely different from the previous person, you will have to find out the records again.

00:02:39

But if the existing lawyer

00:02:42

remains, the lawyer knows the records, but the

00:02:44

additional person

00:02:46

can just figure it out on his own. Please continue to participate. It

00:02:48

will be arranged like this. You can't put it off because of that. They

00:02:52

usually don't fire you when they say they changed the lawyer even though the

00:02:57

trust relationship hasn't been broken. But if the lawyer says that the trust relationship has been broken in the middle or something like that, or something

00:03:00

like that, then again. There may be very rare exceptions, but it is a

00:03:06

case involving a politician like Representative Lee Jae-myung. Is

00:03:09

n't it true? In fact, we

00:03:11

all know. So, it is common sense to say that this was

00:03:13

not an intention to delay the trial,

00:03:15

and the investigation

00:03:18

records. Let's take a look at this. Now, if you look at

00:03:21

the structure of the case at the government office,

00:03:25

the prosecution creates all the evidence during the investigation process. Then, the

00:03:28

evidence needed to prove guilt is passed on.

00:03:30

So, in fact,

00:03:32

all you have to do is report on that and defend. Excluding

00:03:35

things that have nothing to do with proving guilt,

00:03:39

there are some things that are not handed over to the court, but that doesn't really mean anything,

00:03:42

but they say they'll look at that now, so they'll buy

00:03:47

time by inserting an unnecessary procedure in itself, so there are already two tricks.

00:03:49

I went in. So, I hope you can confirm that there was a trick in trying to push it back to April. So whether or

00:03:59

not a conclusion was reached before then is

00:04:01

important, but the person who claims innocence is

00:04:04

putting it off to the extreme. On the contrary,

00:04:06

politically, it is innocent. If it is confirmed, it will be advantageous for the general election.

00:04:08

However, I think it would be good to

00:04:11

evaluate politically why we are trying to do so. If we

00:04:14

summarize now, there are a lot of people in Daejeon-dong Wirae FC. They say there are

00:04:20

close to 300 people, so this will be

00:04:22

after the presidential election. I'll put it off. This is a fire.

00:04:24

Then, there is a notice election law. I

00:04:27

don't know Kim about this. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's

00:04:30

level 4 bureau threatened the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, so Baek Hyung also

00:04:33

went to level 4. This is 50 people in Jeong-in,

00:04:36

50 people, and now Kang Gyu-

00:04:38

tae's trial every two weeks. As for Lee Jae-myung's main trial,

00:04:43

I think it will be difficult to do it before the general election.

00:04:45

Now,

00:04:47

if we look at the results of the trial of Lee Jae-myung's accomplices,

00:04:50

we can roughly guess. So,

00:04:52

today's title is about the possibility before the general election. The

00:04:54

first trial before the general election is already the Kim Yong

00:04:57

trial. Shim came out, and

00:04:59

then today,

00:05:03

we're doing it right now, and the trial of Kim Min-seo and Paul Jeong in Baekhyeon-dong, which will probably be sentenced soon, will be

00:05:08

held in January. Then, the third one that is likely to come out is the

00:05:10

Lee Hwa-hyung trial, and then

00:05:12

finally, now our Bae Seong lawyer is going to have a

00:05:15

hard time. It's a separated government-administered teacher, and

00:05:18

I was going to do these four things, but now the lawyer

00:05:20

said, if you change the order and look at the government-administered teachers' department,

00:05:22

this is not easy. Already Jae-myeong

00:05:25

used two tricks. That's right, the

00:05:27

two tricks in the government-administered teacher are Lee Seong's

00:05:36

lawyer knowledge forum.

00:05:54

Among the rulings that I am looking at, should I

00:06:00

say that the general election is a bit difficult because of the series of tricks that Attorney General Bae Seong-hee is in charge of?

00:06:02

In my view, he

00:06:04

has used two tricks now, so he will not use them in the future.

00:06:06

Then, he will

00:06:09

come out with more in the future to control the time.

00:06:11

So what? They're trying to delay things to the extreme,

00:06:16

and if they interrogate the witnesses we're applying for, they'll say

00:06:19

something different and they'll

00:06:21

add a few more people.

00:06:23

Then, the prosecution's witnesses will

00:06:25

go slow and we won't have time that day. I'm going to

00:06:28

end it and increase the details a lot,

00:06:30

make it impossible for them to be summoned, make it so that my witnesses are

00:06:33

adopted again, and now I'm going to use this method, so I

00:06:37

can make a political evaluation with just the two things that come out, but if more

00:06:39

come out now, I'll tell you about this, the actual truth, the truth, the

00:06:43

guilt and the innocence, and even the formation over there,

00:06:45

how can I do it? I'll put it off because I don't know what you think. Well, I

00:06:49

think it could lead to this kind of evaluation. Now, if

00:06:51

I have to say it in Bae Seung's case, on January 8th,

00:06:54

Mr. Kim Jin-seong will confess, so I'll end it for now. I'll

00:06:57

close the hearing, but

00:07:00

I won't write a public verdict, right.

00:07:06

Isn't it true that Lee Jae-myeong will be tried after the trial is decided? But Jae-myung Lee's side is still saying that they haven't submitted the report yet to make

00:07:09

sure who Jeong-in is.

00:07:10

Then, they will

00:07:12

submit it by January 8th. But the actual

00:07:14

prosecution only needs Jeong-in to do it.

00:07:17

Kim Jin-seong, who confesses right away. And then,

00:07:20

for the first time, Cebes looks like this. So, what I

00:07:23

mean is that the judge should dismiss the useless sentiments Jae-myung Lee is applying for,

00:07:29

right? But will this actually happen?

00:07:32

Ah, this is actually done

00:07:34

by a judge with a sense of purpose. It has low evidentiary value. There

00:07:38

is no need to waste time examining witnesses.

00:07:40

However, since he is a sitting member of the National Assembly and the leader of the opposition party, it is

00:07:46

my burden to dismiss his request for evidence. If you

00:07:50

think, do I really need to have blood on my hands, please accept it.

00:07:52

It's going to be a shame. So, it does

00:07:58

n't matter whether or not it's overlooked. In fact, it has a huge impact on our nation's fate. However, if judges worry about their

00:08:02

own lives rather than doing what they do for judicial justice, it

00:08:06

would be a national tragedy. So look at this from that perspective.

00:08:08

I think you can give it to me. As for the value of the testimony, the value of the witness is,

00:08:10

in fact, as you said,

00:08:16

there is no value in examining witnesses other than the people the prosecution talked about.

00:08:18

That's how I see it. So if you look at it now, there

00:08:23

have been rulings on impersonation of prosecutors long ago, right? Did you

00:08:27

pretend to be a prosecutor because you were all screwed up? Oh, it's not that important, right?

00:08:29

It's

00:08:31

Lee Jae-jik's fault. Now, after

00:08:35

listening to Lee Jae-myeong's defense, what Lee Jae-myeong regrets the most is that he

00:08:38

ordered Jeong Ji-sang back then and asked for help.

00:08:41

Why did I personally

00:08:43

call Mr. Kim at that time? It was automatically recorded and a hundred

00:08:46

confiscations were made. They say

00:08:49

they regret it now, but what I'm curious about is that

00:08:52

if they try to do this, the

00:08:56

quality is not good.

00:08:59

There are many teachers, but about half of them are

00:09:01

jingyeo, but Lee Jae-myung's

00:09:03

teacher is of high quality. This is quite bad, because they

00:09:05

will pay a price and there will be elections in Gyeonggi Province at that time,

00:09:07

so they will try to stop it somehow.

00:09:09

Then, my last

00:09:11

weapon is Judge Lee Hwa-young. Why do you

00:09:15

not accept justice and try to put an end to the unfairness?

00:09:18

Judge Kim Dong-hyun, as far as I know, is from the activist group,

00:09:20

but even that. How can we go?

00:09:23

Is there any other trick to improve the weather?

00:09:25

No, in my opinion, it is not about the judge's personality,

00:09:27

but whether or not the election is held before the general election. Therefore, if it seems like the

00:09:31

judge will

00:09:34

end before then, there

00:09:35

will be more viewers. Yes, that judge or

00:09:38

whatever, because the

00:09:40

legal profession is predicting the conclusion to some extent.

00:09:43

Because the person who perjured

00:09:45

the teacher is

00:09:48

very important. But

00:09:50

since this person is confessing, the

00:09:52

person who taught the crime is very important. No matter how good your defense is,

00:09:55

it's a wailing wall that that person can't overcome. It's a wailing wall. There's no way this person can

00:09:58

overcome it. And

00:10:02

that was recorded. This

00:10:05

person isn't making a claim. So, no matter

00:10:07

how well you structure this incident,

00:10:10

in the end, it's a wall. The person who instigated Mr. Kim's statement that I am confessing

00:10:16

cannot get over it, and

00:10:18

because the nature of the crime is so bad, it

00:10:20

is not a matter of a fine, and even if it is only a matter of a fine,

00:10:22

politically, it would be a fatal wound in my view.

00:10:24

No, because

00:10:27

through this, I

00:10:30

gained political life, ran for the presidential election, and

00:10:33

completely changed the results of this trial,

00:10:35

completely changing our country. So, the

00:10:37

area where perjury is subject to aggravated punishment is

00:10:39

through perjury, the trial results are changed, and

00:10:41

certain benefits are gained. As

00:10:43

the volume increases, the Central District Prosecutor's Office Song Kyung-ho also

00:10:46

said that this alone is a

00:10:47

case for arrest. And regarding perjury, he said that he

00:10:50

has handled many cases but

00:10:52

has never seen such a serious case.

00:10:54

I also talked about it on other broadcasts.

00:10:55

Regarding perjury, there is a historical ordinance. If I

00:11:00

had to pick just one case of a perjury teacher that should be given, I would pick this one.

00:11:03

I too, this

00:11:04

is a 0.001% central case. I have tried many cases.

00:11:08

It is difficult to pick a more serious case than this. That is the case. So,

00:11:11

it is legal detention. Ah, I have not

00:11:13

been arrested in court so far.

00:11:15

I'm telling you this because there is. Rather than that, is

00:11:20

there any case in which one's political gain has been greater than this? Yes, then,

00:11:26

if you summarize the things that are previewed in reverse order, this should usually

00:11:28

come out quickly, right? Lee Jae

00:11:30

Kim and Ji Ji. Even if that's a problem later, I'll try to

00:11:34

attract a lot of

00:11:37

support. There's a possibility that this will be the correct answer,

00:11:39

right? And actually, I think I'll just keep adding in inquiries and

00:11:40

things like that. It's

00:11:43

a long time since I need to get a reply, but it's

00:11:45

proof that I need to hold on to it now to save time.

00:11:46

I think there will be a lot of application methods.

00:11:48

Now, this is the third, then the

00:11:51

second ruling. Now, during Lee Jae-myeong's trial, I am

00:11:55

receiving a teacher. If you

00:11:57

look in reverse order, there is Lee Hwa-young in Ssangbangwool. Well,

00:11:59

I will check this. I will be with Kim and

00:12:04

Choi Yong-gil on Wednesday. I went to the trial with Director Shin Jin-woo, and

00:12:06

there were accounts under him, and the prosecutor also

00:12:09

asked about it. Ours is now

00:12:11

closed. Then, as Director Lee is

00:12:13

leaving, he said that he has a strong will to sentence Lee Hwa-young unconditionally and

00:12:16

go.

00:12:18

So, Lee Hwa-young is deeply concerned that the general election will have to be postponed no matter what. You

00:12:21

applied,

00:12:23

right? But what doesn't make sense is that the prosecutor

00:12:28

applied for the absurd reason that Judge Shin Moo-han did not stop him, but

00:12:31

this was rejected in the first trial after

00:12:35

89 days on the 8th, 9th, 12:00, right? But it was

00:12:38

in the Supreme Court last month.

00:12:41

I did it on the 27th. Then, if it was the 27th of last month,

00:12:44

it would be the 15th of this year. It's already been the 20th, but

00:12:47

the Supreme Court has not made a decision. So the

00:12:49

prosecution

00:12:53

submitted a request for a speedy decision to the Supreme Court. What does the prosecution say? Please

00:12:56

make a decision quickly to the Supreme Court. Is

00:13:01

n't it the same as the one that accepted our application for recusal? This is the one who

00:13:03

filed it. But now I

00:13:05

don't know the name of the North Korean pavilion. There are six people

00:13:07

going to Japa, and I know who is holding it. I

00:13:09

asked the Supreme Court today to tell them all. If you

00:13:11

know the name of this Daebuk pavilion, I will

00:13:13

continue to broadcast it on the air. No, for 20 days. They

00:13:16

haven't reached a conclusion, but

00:13:18

it will get better soon. I came to Daejeon, and if you do this, you

00:13:20

can be sentenced right away. You can do it right away. There are

00:13:23

only a few trials left. Right now, it

00:13:25

only needs to be done two or three times.

00:13:27

So,

00:13:29

the dismissal decision is coming out next week, and it's on the merits.

00:13:32

If I come back, I can finish it before the general election and

00:13:35

before the personnel changes and even get the sentencing.

00:13:38

So I'm just doing it to kill time because I know better than anyone else, but

00:13:43

if I elaborate a little on what Sergeant Seobyeon said, I'll show you

00:13:46

how much sense this application really makes. You

00:13:47

may know. First of all, Lee Hwa-young's trial was

00:13:50

under detention, and the detention period

00:13:52

was renewed once, so the trial was held for about a year.

00:13:54

The judge

00:13:56

held the trial for a year. After a full trial, he suddenly said he

00:13:59

couldn't trust the judge.

00:14:01

What did you do? They

00:14:07

say there is a problem because the judge does not discipline the guided interrogation, but that also makes no sense. Now,

00:14:09

lawyers who defend criminals just

00:14:12

laugh. If you say something like that and if it

00:14:15

seems like it will be a problem, the defense will ask the

00:14:17

judge.

00:14:19

Why did he have to block the question by saying, "Why

00:14:21

did he do that?

00:14:22

Why did he stay silent until the attack? Why do you

00:14:24

blame the judge and try without any objections for a year and

00:14:26

now you're doing

00:14:28

it?" It's a courtroom couple's fight. In

00:14:30

fact, I mean, Hwa-young Lee. The

00:14:35

situation has now turned upside down since something unfavorable to CEO Lee Jae-myeong came out in the prosecutor's statement, but

00:14:36

we have all seen it.

00:14:39

So

00:14:43

there is no reason to now find fault with something that was previously tried without any objections.

00:14:45

So, on the 8th and 9th. It has been dismissed for the first time in a long time, so

00:14:48

the Supreme Court has

00:14:50

no reason to drag it out. And when it comes back, there are

00:14:53

not many trials left. The conclusion is, in fact, to

00:14:55

some extent, the conclusion we are thinking of is

00:14:57

all in our minds.

00:15:02

Well,

00:15:03

Judge Lee Dong-ro will throw it away and throw it away after the general election.

00:15:08

It is difficult to find any other intention other than the intention to throw it away.

00:15:10

So, at that time, Ewha Young-i

00:15:12

acted as if she had no complaints with the judge, but

00:15:15

the wife made a fuss, and at that time, when Attorney Minbyun was

00:15:17

just making a serious application to the court, Ewha

00:15:19

Young-i said to the judge that she would not make a serious application to the court. The

00:15:21

sudden change is a

00:15:24

really absurd accident. Now, I've

00:15:27

looked at the two rulings, and the

00:15:29

third one is right. You know

00:15:33

Baekhyeon-dong, Kim Min-seop, and Jeong Paul, who are doing it today. They

00:15:36

took 7 billion won right now, but they

00:15:38

asked for 20 billion won, but

00:15:43

7 billion won. Kim Min-soo ate the 10 billion won, and the

00:15:45

10 billion he ate was for two people. Anyone

00:15:50

passing by in Seongnam would know who those two people are. I

00:15:53

mean Lee Jae-myung, who

00:15:55

worked hard. Those two people said they thought so, so

00:15:58

Lee came out. I

00:15:59

even stated that I thought so. If this is

00:16:02

concluded today, Director Kim Ok-kwon. If the 27th part is

00:16:05

sentenced to intermediate punishment in January, then

00:16:07

Representative Jae-myung Lee announces that in the election law, Baekhyeon-dong's

00:16:11

national territory is threatened. This

00:16:13

is not broken. It is broken. It is completely Kim Min-seop's

00:16:16

lobby. That's why this step is so important.

00:16:18

Not only is it incredibly important, but

00:16:20

you have to look at this together now. As

00:16:22

for Baek Hyeon-dong, the main case was

00:16:24

indicted on charges of breach of trust, so

00:16:26

there's a big chunk of it, right? And that's because in the public election

00:16:28

law, there were threatening remarks made about Baek Hyeon-dong.

00:16:31

There is one more thing. And

00:16:33

there is one more case from Kim In-seop's city. When

00:16:34

Mr. Kim In-seop's case comes out,

00:16:37

we can already know the conclusions of the previous two cases. You

00:16:38

can think of it this way. Because

00:16:40

first, isn't Baek Hyeon-dong a breach of trust?

00:16:43

Let's fight about this then.

00:16:45

Regarding this, the legal principle of breach of trust itself is a bit

00:16:47

difficult, so I am continuing to insist on it now. It

00:16:54

makes no sense to charge me with this just because I was doing it and a loss occurred. So now,

00:16:57

legally, there is a thing called the rule of management judgment.

00:17:01

When making policy decisions or business decisions, there

00:17:08

is a law that says you should not be punished even if you make a wrong decision and incur a loss, but that is

00:17:10

only cutting the legal principle in half.

00:17:12

Nevertheless, the decision is based on the

00:17:15

understanding of illegal gains. Isn't this a judgment made because the relationship is intertwined?

00:17:20

So, is there anything that could easily be recognized as a breach of trust again or is there any attempt to

00:17:23

make a profit? Is there

00:17:26

a bribery or mediation system here?

00:17:29

But that's the case with Kim Min-seop.

00:17:34

There is a mediation system for the back end, right? If this is resolved, it

00:17:36

will automatically lead to breach of trust. That's

00:17:38

how important it is.

00:17:40

If you look at this, Min-seop Kim's

00:17:42

existence is actually a lobbyist. Ah, but it has

00:17:47

been confirmed that this person received 7.7 billion won. However, if this person

00:17:50

was promoted, it was confirmed that this business was

00:17:51

carried out.

00:17:53

If you say there was no lobbying, this business makes no sense.

00:17:56

Mr. Kim Min-seop has no role.

00:17:57

Then, yes, but Kim Seop also

00:18:00

received money in the name of

00:18:03

lobbying. But what if he claims that he received money in the name of lobbying but did

00:18:04

not lobby?

00:18:06

In this case, it is fraud. That's right.

00:18:09

I mean, but the sentence for special price

00:18:11

fraud is about twice as

00:18:13

high as that of arranging. You know, you are

00:18:19

not in a situation where you can say that I just committed fraud to protect someone. So, you can't do that.

00:18:21

In the past, the

00:18:24

warrant request for CEO Lee Jae-myeong related to Baekhyun is

00:18:26

now acknowledged by Paul Jeong.

00:18:29

And it has been confirmed that Kim In-seop also made an admission statement regarding the first part.

00:18:32

So, this case will be

00:18:34

concluded in mid-January. Not

00:18:36

only did it come out, but I feel like the chief judge

00:18:39

did a very good job of planning the trial.

00:18:41

Because when the election period is held in mid-January, I

00:18:43

usually

00:18:45

write a judgment while understanding the records. Shouldn't we have

00:18:48

another trial while we are still a little uncertain about this part?

00:18:51

There are cases where arguments are resumed, but

00:18:55

you set the date now to allow time for the resumption. So the

00:18:57

sentence will be in mid-January, but if it has to be resumed, it will be resumed immediately

00:19:00

after that, and the trial will be held

00:19:02

once more, and then the ruling will be made again. Even so,

00:19:08

I feel that you have carefully set a date for what can be done before I change personnel. So, this

00:19:10

will be a sentencing. Also, if Kim Min-seop's

00:19:13

case is found guilty, it

00:19:17

could be a very fatal blow to remarks on the public official election law.

00:19:19

Now,

00:19:21

if I were to explain why, I can't explain the fact that it was a level 4 belligerence. It ca

00:19:25

n't be explained factually or legally. Since I ca

00:19:27

n't explain this, I'm going to say that I did it

00:19:29

because of threats when I was interrogated at the time. The issue of

00:19:33

publishing false facts under the official election law is the

00:19:35

issue, but since the word 'threat'

00:19:38

keeps appearing in the headlines, there are many people who think that is

00:19:41

the key and everything,

00:19:43

and in the case of the non-legal Democratic

00:19:46

Party panel, they think that is really the

00:19:48

only thing and talk about only that. But

00:19:51

that's just because I don't know much about the current law. It's

00:19:55

not the threat that's important, but the entire testimony

00:19:57

is important. Yes,

00:19:59

there is an innovation city that Lee Jae-myung said, and

00:20:04

according to the law, it has no choice but to follow the instructions of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. This is what

00:20:12

happened because they threatened that abandonment would be a problem.

00:20:13

The threat appears at the end, but the

00:20:15

decisive factor in this matter is that the

00:20:18

Innovation City Act does not apply,

00:20:20

right. Then, consider it.

00:20:22

If the law is not applied, I will follow the instructions of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

00:20:24

There is no obligation. If you say you didn't follow it even though you don't have an obligation,

00:20:27

then your job

00:20:29

can't be an issue. I'm a free person, so I

00:20:31

can make my own decisions. So it can't be a threat.

00:20:33

But at the end, I wonder if there is a threat or

00:20:35

not. So what do other people say? Ah, it's a

00:20:38

subjective feeling that it's a threat, but they

00:20:40

say it like that. The

00:20:42

fact that you can't do it means you don't know much about the structure of this case or the law, and the

00:20:44

fact that it is a threat is

00:20:47

just the end of the whole thing, and the

00:20:49

reporters put this

00:20:51

in the title, so part of it has come to the fore.

00:20:53

Overall, it's an

00:20:55

indictment. Yes, it is also stated that the Innovative City Act does

00:20:57

not apply to this case.

00:20:59

That is important, because the content is

00:21:01

directly included in the official document. Is this a

00:21:04

request made by the Innovation City? So no,

00:21:06

please handle it. That is why

00:21:07

the official document was highlighted as important. It's not about

00:21:09

whether it's a threat or not, it's about whether

00:21:11

there's a legal obligation or

00:21:13

not, but there's no obligation. Then,

00:21:15

dereliction of duty is not a problem, and dereliction of duty is

00:21:17

not a problem, but since it can't be a threat, the

00:21:19

relevant public officials came out and I said, "

00:21:22

We're the ones making the decision, so I don't have

00:21:24

anything to do with it." I didn't care,

00:21:25

there was no pressure or anything, and I made a statement.

00:21:32

Even if the ticket was false, I

00:21:36

would be punished legally. That's how it was passed. There is a

00:21:37

reason why it was passed over legally.

00:21:39

So now, the factual

00:21:41

claims have been broken a lot and the image

00:21:43

has been damaged a lot. Looking at it this way, to

00:21:45

summarize like the lawyer's excellent analysis, when

00:21:48

asked if the special law on innovation cities in the official document applies,

00:21:51

no, this is the key now. Lee Jae-myung's

00:21:56

lawyer sees it this way, and now Lee Jae-myung's lawyer absurdly says that it is

00:21:59

no longer a defense, so he said

00:22:01

to the National Assembly. They did it through the Garden Appraisal Act, but

00:22:05

there was no accusation. Since there was no accusation,

00:22:07

it wasn't the customary law,

00:22:09

but now they were indicted under the Public Official Election Act. So

00:22:11

now, other than this law, there will be no unfavorable punishment. They even

00:22:16

punished me with this thing called disposition, so it's as

00:22:18

if they can't be punished legally at all. It is an absurd

00:22:21

claim, but our precedent is that when he testified in front of the National Assembly, he

00:22:26

was punished with an honorable hand.

00:22:28

Well, I don't see this either.

00:22:32

And in fact, if you look at the law itself,

00:22:34

this doesn't make sense. Usually,

00:22:36

criminal matters are not punished. It

00:22:39

's used. It's not disposed of. It's just a

00:22:42

statement itself that's wrong.

00:22:44

And CEO Lee Jae-myeong's

00:22:47

lawyer sees all the related provisions when he defends us as criminals. He

00:22:49

reports them all and

00:22:52

develops a strategy. Is this new article added this time? Is

00:22:54

n't it the original article that

00:22:56

already existed? They knew originally, but

00:22:58

bringing it in now is just

00:22:59

as difficult. They must have known in the beginning that they couldn't do it, so

00:23:04

why did they do it when they knew it couldn't be done? I really

00:23:05

wonder why they did it, and the reason why they're so

00:23:08

embarrassed now is similar to the case of Governor Kim Kyung-soo in the past.

00:23:10

Yes, I wasn't there when Governor Kim Kyung-soo was

00:23:13

demonstrating Druking's king crab,

00:23:16

but when the court heard this at the time, it was a

00:23:19

tentative conclusion, but it

00:23:21

appears that he was present

00:23:23

at the venue. We

00:23:27

used to do it like this. It's the

00:23:29

same now. But

00:23:33

when the court heard about preliminary arguments, our lawyers said, "

00:23:34

Oh, this is the end of the judgment."

00:23:40

I don't do that very often because I

00:23:42

can get on both sides of the argument, so it

00:23:44

seems like it would be really good. I'll try this argument once and

00:23:46

if it doesn't work out, there's also this. If I do it this way,

00:23:47

if I can do something, I'll do three or four things.

00:23:50

But the reason I don't do that is because it

00:23:52

lacks clarity, credibility, and I don't trust it.

00:23:54

That's why I didn't do it, but

00:23:56

now that I'm adding it, I

00:23:59

can see that this intention is a bit strong. I also see this as a

00:24:01

suicide. If the judge sees

00:24:03

Lee Jae-myeong as immature, then put it in front of him

00:24:08

because Lee Jae-myeong's words are just fiction. I'm not making a preliminary claim. What I'm

00:24:09

saying is, ah,

00:24:12

there are three trials that are previewing the last one. Daejeon-dong has already

00:24:14

come out. I am Kim Yong.

00:24:21

Daejang-dong trial. This is very meaningful. First, the body structure in Daejang-dong is the main culprit of Lee Jae-myeong.

00:24:29

This was the key. Yoo Dong-gyu's garden is

00:24:32

very credible and trustworthy.

00:24:34

In this regard, Kim Yong-ui was detained by the court for 5 years.

00:24:37

This is

00:24:39

a fatal blow to Lee Jae-myeong. So in conclusion, after Kim Yong's trial,

00:24:42

we saw Kim Min-seok,

00:24:45

then Lee Hwa-young, and then Kim Jin-seong. Four

00:24:49

of them are fatal blows to Lee Jae-myung.

00:24:51

This is how I see the result. In fact, even

00:24:54

if there is only one, this is

00:24:56

an incident that needs to be taken political responsibility, but it has

00:24:58

come to this point and we are praying for time to go back while

00:25:01

maintaining our position politically and making it bulletproof. In the

00:25:04

meantime, it

00:25:10

feels really unfortunate that the country is really reeling and that this burden is all resulting in disadvantages for the people, but this

00:25:13

incident makes us think

00:25:16

that although time may be slow,

00:25:19

the conclusion is moving in that direction, according to our common sense.

00:25:21

And let's take a moment to look at Mr. Kim Yong's trial. There was

00:25:28

a lot of talk about how the statement was credible while attacking Mr. Kim Yong, but the ruling

00:25:30

report has now confirmed it.

00:25:31

All of Kim Young-si's statements have been confirmed to be true, so Kim Yong-si's statement was confirmed to be true

00:25:34

in other cases.

00:25:37

Also, Yoo Dong-gyu is a key witness. Ah,

00:25:39

Dong-gyu Yoo. That's right. Mr. Yoo Dong-gyu is a key

00:25:43

witness, so his credibility

00:25:45

has no choice but to be acknowledged. Because when I

00:25:47

tell the truth in one case and

00:25:49

tell lies in another related case, it immediately clashes.

00:25:51

That can't happen.

00:25:53

And in this case. That Mr. Donggyo did

00:25:56

n't benefit from it. Now that he has been found not guilty, the

00:25:59

Democratic Party is even saying something, but the person who

00:26:01

received it was

00:26:03

indicted as an accomplice, so the court is

00:26:05

indicting the person who gave it as an accomplice, so they are saying that, but

00:26:07

we are talking about bribes and such money. In this problematic

00:26:10

case, the party who received the punishment is more severely punished. The fact that the party who

00:26:12

received the punishment was severely indicted is

00:26:14

not a compliment in itself. And if the case is

00:26:17

handed over to the party who received it in the appeals court, he will

00:26:18

be found guilty. Yoo Dong-kyo even said that he

00:26:20

thinks he will be found guilty.

00:26:21

You know, and

00:26:24

the prosecution also had a reason for that

00:26:26

because Yoo Dong-gyu told the whole truth, and Mr.

00:26:28

Yoo Dong-gyu's

00:26:30

credibility went back and forth, and Mr.

00:26:32

Kim Yong's lawyer

00:26:34

said something like that, but that's not the case

00:26:36

in the first place. There is a

00:26:38

small amount, but it is true that Mr. Yoo Dong-gyu

00:26:40

gave it to me, but I remember it from

00:26:42

10 years ago,

00:26:45

so I said it was 23 years ago. So,

00:26:47

because I said it was unclear,

00:26:48

the court also said that, so this is what

00:26:50

they did now with some innocence.

00:26:52

Since it was uncertain about 20 million won, he

00:26:54

said he was also uncertain. That is, he said he was

00:26:56

certain, but that did

00:26:57

not destroy his credibility. And

00:27:02

regarding the money that was transferred to the political fund law in the middle, Mr.

00:27:04

Yoo Dong-gyu and Mr. Jeong Min-yong received about 200 million won. I spent it and

00:27:06

returned 100 million, but Yoo Dong-

00:27:08

gyu also said that the total amount was

00:27:10

over 800 million, and of that, I spent over 600 million and 200 million,

00:27:16

but what he said was actually not the relationship.

00:27:18

Everything

00:27:19

was admitted, but the prosecution

00:27:26

said that about 800 million won of money came to me up to this point.

00:27:29

If you want to say that it is a crime on the part of Kim Yong, the person who

00:27:32

received the amount of money that came from Yoo Dong-gyu

00:27:34

should be considered an accomplice.

00:27:39

As for the person who received the money from the beginning, the

00:27:41

200 million won

00:27:43

has to be deducted from the indictment from the beginning. So,

00:27:45

in order to indict him as much as possible and punish him the harshest,

00:27:47

this is done so that

00:27:49

Mr. Yoo Dong-gyu is punished the most severely. It

00:27:52

was composed because it was serious. That is, it

00:27:56

has very little divinity, and even if the rest of the part is reduced in the second trial, it is inevitable that he will be found

00:27:59

guilty. So

00:28:01

Yoo Dong-gyu's statement is that he

00:28:03

said he will be punished,

00:28:05

so it is higher in character. Yes, that's right. The

00:28:07

second topic, we.

00:28:10

There's a Songtnam in the envelope box, right now, Song

00:28:13

Young-gil's review is on Monday. I

00:28:19

asked a few questions to the prosecution today. Hey,

00:28:23

Yoo Chang-woo is Yoo Chang-woo this week. The three judges

00:28:26

take turns examining him every week, so they

00:28:29

ask him why he did it during Yoo Chang-ho's time. When I looked at it,

00:28:32

I got an answer. What it means is that the prosecution deliberately

00:28:37

chose Changwon to file a claim. That's why

00:28:39

I asked. And when I asked, "No, why

00:28:41

did you deliberately save it?", it gave three reasons. First, the

00:28:51

warrant for Lee Jae-myeong was expired.

00:28:53

You get a lot of criticism for that,

00:28:55

but if you keep doing it this time, it will really get to the point where it will be

00:28:58

difficult to have a private life. Lee

00:29:01

Jae-myung's decision is in Song-gil's

00:29:04

direction. This is the first

00:29:07

reason, and the second important thing is that Chang-hoon is

00:29:11

now spreading that money under Song-gil.

00:29:14

Then, the warrant for Park Yong-su's office

00:29:16

was given. But the greater the authority, the greater the responsibility. He

00:29:19

kept it and made it a special case.

00:29:23

What will Song do? This is the second

00:29:26

reason. The third reason is that

00:29:29

Chang-woo often dismisses it anyway, so

00:29:31

if he dismisses it, he has something saved to claim it next time.

00:29:35

There is a chat room. Waz Korea. Well, I

00:29:38

have Song Young-gil again. He can investigate this a little more and

00:29:44

request another warrant without any burden. It would be a burden on these three people. They

00:29:46

are the party representatives. But since Song Young-gil did

00:29:48

not take anything and it is nothing, if I

00:29:50

file a request, the prosecution will do it. If you look at my church, you can see that

00:29:52

Yoo Chang-ho can't come, but someone else like Yoon Jae-nam or

00:29:55

Lee Min-soo is doing it.

00:29:57

So now you can try it out. So, there's a good chance that

00:29:59

Yoo Chang-gu will issue one, and in the

00:30:00

worst case, even if you don't do it, they'll

00:30:03

claim it again, so why

00:30:05

not go to someone else? I won, but how

00:30:07

do you see it? First of all, I actually

00:30:13

heard the inside story for the first time on the server, and this is also my first broadcast.

00:30:16

But I don't know if there was that consideration, but if you

00:30:19

listen to it, it's very persuasive. I

00:30:20

think it's persuasive, and I think it's persuasive.

00:30:26

Chief Judge Yoo Chang-won also thinks that he has no choice but to issue this. As

00:30:31

for the charge, the money envelope incident alone is

00:30:33

enough to warrant arrest,

00:30:34

right? Also, Kang Rae-gu and Yoon Kwan-seok, aide Bangmo,

00:30:39

issued an order for three people, one of which was his. issued it directly, but it ca

00:30:46

n't be done.

00:30:49

This can't be done. The incident itself

00:30:51

can't be that. And

00:30:53

since more charges have been revealed about the muksa, the

00:30:56

crime should be considered one times 3 more serious than the person arrested in front of him.

00:30:59

That's right, and uh, evidence of fear of flight.

00:31:04

Regarding concerns about destruction, how can they try to destroy evidence beyond paying for a tin phone and replacing the hard disk?

00:31:10

And

00:31:14

people who don't know much about destruction of evidence say things like this. Well,

00:31:15

enough evidence

00:31:17

has been collected and there is no concern.

00:31:19

But I really don't know that.

00:31:22

Because, think about it, the

00:31:24

prosecution is investigating. They collect evidence,

00:31:27

but there is not enough evidence. Then they

00:31:29

dismiss it as there is no explanation for the charges, right? But they

00:31:31

collect a lot of evidence. So if they collect a lot, the

00:31:33

charges can be explained. It was

00:31:35

dismissed because there was no concern about the destruction of evidence. Then, even

00:31:41

if the dismissal was like that, the dismissal would have made the law that way. That's what Chang-woo did. It was during Lee Jae-myeong's time. It doesn't normally do that. It doesn't normally

00:31:43

do that. So a lot of evidence was

00:31:45

gathered and the evidence was clear, so the charges were justified and the charges were lowered.

00:31:54

It is a hypothetical judgment to say that there is a serious crime and you will want to run away and destroy it. That is why the

00:31:57

seriousness of the charge is the

00:31:59

greatest and the rest are secondary. So

00:32:01

if there is an attempt to destroy it, there is

00:32:03

no need to look at it twice. Now it

00:32:05

has come like this, but strangely. Sufficient evidence

00:32:08

has been collected and there is no risk of dismissal, so it is

00:32:12

a logic created by politicians to dismiss it. You

00:32:16

know what I explained to you about the conflict. The prosecution must collect a lot or

00:32:17

a small amount. That doesn't make sense.

00:32:20

And this doesn't make sense. As mentioned earlier, there

00:32:23

has been a lot of physical evidence. I am saying this, but

00:32:26

this is also very

00:32:28

important. This is also very important. Perjury is also appearing in other cases such as the Kim Yong trial.

00:32:33

Attempts to cajole and agree, all of these things are

00:32:36

evidence. Didn't they search and confiscate

00:32:43

the traders who were concerned about destruction?

00:32:47

Saying that it should be dismissed is really

00:32:49

ignorant of the facts. Since the evidence was faithfully

00:32:52

collected and there was an attempt to destroy it, I

00:32:56

wonder if there is actually a need to think twice. So, now is the time when windows were in the past

00:32:59

Lee Jae-myeong's warrant had three powers. If you

00:33:01

look at it at the time, there would be

00:33:04

room for a fight if both sides cry, so they did

00:33:07

n't arrest him again. Also, the teacher's explanation is

00:33:10

highly doubtful, but since all the evidence has been collected, there

00:33:13

is no need to destroy it.

00:33:18

This doesn't make sense, but I'm like, "What is Song Yeon

00:33:22

doing? Why am I saying

00:33:24

this is such an important event? Why am I talking about this for

00:33:27

so long?

00:33:29

How much is this? How important is this?"

00:33:31

So, if I give an example,

00:33:33

Song Young-gil is a bribe. Oh, let's

00:33:37

see what the political funds were poured into. Now, what about

00:33:40

bribes? Attorney, as you know, even if we pay 10

00:33:42

million won, we still charge for everything. But the

00:33:45

bribe received in interest is 40 million won.

00:33:47

Then, since this is 3,000 to 5,000 won, it

00:33:49

goes under the special price law, right? It's been

00:33:51

more than 5 years. It's a huge scene. 4,000 people

00:33:54

are the second political fund. The interest

00:33:57

received is over 700 million won. But usually, even

00:33:59

if you receive tens of millions of won, you get a warrant. That's also

00:34:02

huge. Then, it's important to throw money envelopes, but

00:34:04

I see that the union president

00:34:06

was elected. The root of 120,000 won was arrested. There are

00:34:08

a lot of people who are like that. That's right,

00:34:11

I'm Song Hyung. Hey, the amount is

00:34:14

not that much, so what's the importance?

00:34:15

There's a word missing in front of it. There's

00:34:18

a word missing in front of it. What's missing?

00:34:20

Compared to Lee Jae-myung, compared to Lee Jae-myung,

00:34:23

hey, what's this important event? Why are you

00:34:25

investigating this? You are right. Why is Lee Jae-myung worth

00:34:28

billions and tens of billions? He is a weapon. But you

00:34:32

should not compare Lee Jae-myung. If you

00:34:34

compare him with others, the union leaders who were arrested for taking 10,000 won in bribes, then the

00:34:39

civil servants who were arrested for receiving 10 million won in bribes, then the political party, which is worth

00:34:42

tens of millions. There are people who have been arrested after receiving a complaint.

00:34:44

I

00:34:46

believe the charges are quite serious. I see three

00:34:49

crimes related to that election: violation of the Public Official Election Act,

00:34:51

violation of the Political Party Act, and

00:34:53

violation of the Act on Entrusted Elections. But

00:34:55

I have committed two of the three.

00:34:57

It's just a violation. This is a

00:34:58

field where there are no cases anymore. But what

00:35:01

I felt while doing the election crime was, "Why do the

00:35:07

standards go back and forth depending on the political power?"

00:35:13

It was a total disaster, and they

00:35:17

filed all the warrant requests for 300 won, 300 won,

00:35:19

200,000 won each, and just threw it

00:35:20

away.

00:35:23

In the case of my client, it was 900,000 won, 900,000 won, so they

00:35:29

did it three times, 30, 30, etc. Anyway, I think that was the case. It

00:35:30

wasn't 1 million won, but they

00:35:31

still requested the video. But

00:35:34

if you ask me, what's important about this? The basis of democracy

00:35:36

is elections, so you

00:35:39

can't say that while damaging the order of elections, and that's

00:35:41

what happened inside the political party. But why are you

00:35:43

investigating this and why are you trying to punish this?

00:35:47

There is a previous precedent in the case of National Assembly Speaker Park Hee-tae. At that time,

00:35:49

National Assembly Speaker Park Hee-tae said the same thing. The reason

00:35:52

the court criticized it at that time is that it was

00:35:54

problematic, so the

00:35:56

National Assembly members created a punishment provision to punish it. You are

00:35:58

the members of the National Assembly, so why do you claim that

00:36:00

this is not a punishable matter if you get caught?

00:36:02

Then you either make a law or not, and

00:36:03

you criticize it, but now that I

00:36:06

have been caught, the law is problematic,

00:36:08

the investigation is problematic, and that may be the case within the political party. It

00:36:11

is a practice. It's

00:36:12

too lame to talk like this. Bribery and

00:36:15

violations of the political fund law are very

00:36:16

important now. This is beyond the special price law, and the

00:36:19

amount of the political fund law is too big, and the

00:36:22

issue itself is too big.

00:36:28

Afterwards, I saw many other cases being ruined.

00:36:30

Now, there is a need to make the law more

00:36:32

clear and set clear standards regardless of who it is. This needs to be done

00:36:37

in this case as well. Now, even

00:36:40

in the state of the law, we are doing this in self-deprecatory terms. It

00:36:42

will probably be issued. I think the

00:36:45

difference between Chief Judge Yoo Chang-bun's issuance and

00:36:47

dismissal is just the difference between whether there is a line and whether it

00:36:50

is broken. Isn't there a

00:36:52

point in talking about something like this?

00:36:55

It's because Lee Jae-myeong and Lee Myeong are asking whether there is a line. I was shocked because he was the

00:36:57

leader of the party and lost his middle age.

00:37:01

So,

00:37:03

if something like this comes out, I

00:37:09

think there is a need to think again about whether the judiciary really needs to be ruined to this extent.

00:37:10

So now the leftists are

00:37:12

saying there is no evidence. As far as I know,

00:37:15

there is a person who gave that 5,000 won. He is Mr. Kim from the Department of History.

00:37:17

He is Kim Young-kwon. He is my

00:37:20

brother of 20 years. He decided that

00:37:25

I gave him 50 million won and even received a phone call from Song Gi to thank him. There is

00:37:29

enough evidence now. Now, I

00:37:32

see that there are only two things protecting Song Young-gil.

00:37:34

One is his older brother. He is a

00:37:38

former judge. My brother defended him, but he said that's

00:37:40

okay, and my brother said so.

00:37:42

After that, the

00:37:45

last person next to Song Young-gil is Song Young-gil.

00:37:48

There is talk. There is Mr. Ah, who

00:37:52

protects Song, but now I talk to

00:37:55

a lot of people from that school and other things, but

00:37:59

when I ask them what they want to eat most in prison,

00:38:02

there are a lot of people who say they want to eat Jjajangmyeon the most. So, if

00:38:04

Song goes to prison,

00:38:07

maybe he eats Jjajangmyeon beforehand. I asked what I wanted to ask. But this is a regular customer, so

00:38:12

I'm going to kill one of them with empty tea. Song

00:38:19

Yeong-gi is annoyed and says he will kill me with empty tea for 5,000. He also said a lot that he gave it with empty tea. But the problem is that the

00:38:22

dogs are staring at the remaining jjajangmyeon. When I

00:38:25

actually

00:38:28

asked about it, they said it had onion content.

00:38:30

It destroys red blood cells and

00:38:33

could cause her death. What do experts do when they see this?

00:38:35

Experts say that guy has never

00:38:37

raised a dog. He doesn't even take care of a dog,

00:38:42

as if he loves his pet a lot. They say it's okay, but how

00:38:44

do I look at this? Actually, I don't

00:38:47

take pictures often. Because I

00:38:50

don't use personal social media. I don't use personal social media, and I've

00:38:54

never uploaded a picture to my profile on KakaoTalk or anything like that.

00:38:55

Because now, it's a little bit like that. It's

00:38:57

difficult and embarrassing,

00:38:58

so when other people take pictures, I

00:39:03

often think about why I want to show them. I'm

00:39:05

eating black bean noodles and there's

00:39:08

a dog next to me, so I take a picture when I see the person next to me. You

00:39:10

know, Dada's setting, ah, there's a setting shot. It's

00:39:16

not about my feelings for my pet dog, but I'm talking about it as an Instagram-worthy

00:39:17

thing, but

00:39:20

isn't it just using it as a prop? It's

00:39:21

for the sake of how I look. Oh, I

00:39:24

really don't think you'll do that. Is

00:39:25

this person using the

00:39:28

people around them, even their dogs, for a political message? It's

00:39:34

his fault that it has become such a necessary situation. Ah, I just

00:39:41

thought this is really pitiful as a human being, and

00:39:44

I hope you enjoy the Jajangmyeon. This is the first time I have heard of Jay Song Young-gil's

00:39:47

case. It's been a long time since it happened.

00:39:49

At that time, they wanted to tie up that warrant. I

00:39:51

go on various broadcasts. I always say

00:39:54

Wooseok's voice first. Hey, this is

00:40:01

issued to Chang-woo for screening. I broadcasted every day like this, but it was really assigned to Yoo Chang-ho. The prosecution issued this.

00:40:03

I think I will have to protect my side, but

00:40:06

Song Young-

00:40:08

gil is still acting

00:40:11

as if he is a victim of oppression by the prosecution,

00:40:14

but I was texting this a while ago and I was

00:40:19

annoyed by the article saying that he was really a leftist, so I

00:40:21

almost got into a fight while talking about Jae-myung Lee. But to

00:40:23

lighten the mood, I said this

00:40:26

when I thought Song Young-gil received the money, and

00:40:28

the left-wing article said, “Ah,

00:40:30

Song Young-gil received the money.” The

00:40:32

whole country knows that much about Governor Lee Jae-myung, but the

00:40:36

most important thing I specify here is

00:40:38

when we issue warrants. You don't need 100% clear evidence to

00:40:40

prove that Song Young-gil had an envelope with money.

00:40:46

That's an issue later

00:40:48

when you go to trial on guilt or innocence, and

00:40:51

now, at the warrant

00:40:54

stage, there's a lot of doubt.

00:40:57

I'm like that to everyone I meet. Hey, what is

00:41:00

Songi doing by sprinkling it under the money?

00:41:04

Don't you have a lot of doubt? I

00:41:06

have doubts. I'm sure, but then since this

00:41:08

will be issued, I

00:41:10

have a 100% chance of being issued. So what do you think in conclusion? I think it's okay,

00:41:14

right. I think

00:41:16

it's safe. Is this not our fault, but the

00:41:18

company's fault? Yoo Ah, so

00:41:24

when I spoke on the air about the dismissal of the warrant, I got everything right and the only thing that was

00:41:27

wrong was the case of CEO Jae-myung Lee.

00:41:29

Oh, lawyer, everything was right, everything was right.

00:41:31

I was like that, so I'll speak with more confidence.

00:41:32

What I can say is that even

00:41:34

when Chief Judge Yoo Chang-won dismissed it, I

00:41:36

spoke on the air the next day. I was excited and asked

00:41:38

what was different from my practical experience and

00:41:41

what was wrong. This is not a person with

00:41:44

great authority under the law,

00:41:47

but a person who must feel responsibility. The

00:41:52

moment I think that I can let this go, tragedy

00:41:54

ensues. I think this way. I see

00:41:56

this a lot in politicians' cases. They are

00:41:57

arrested in that calling, and

00:42:01

now, higher than that, they are found guilty out of Yuje's confidence.

00:42:03

But this

00:42:05

is reversed in a politician's case. Yes,

00:42:07

if it is at this level, they are

00:42:11

released in reverse in a case where they should have been arrested and tried, and then a few years later, they are found

00:42:14

guilty and

00:42:16

arrested at that time. The issue has already

00:42:19

passed, but this is delayed justice.

00:42:21

It's not justice. The issue has passed and the moment it was dismissed,

00:42:23

I've been claiming innocence. If I claim innocence,

00:42:26

the public is being deceived and their eyes and

00:42:30

ears are covered by other facts. They wo

00:42:32

n't be able to make a proper judgment, but

00:42:33

our teacher Cho Kuk's

00:42:36

story is a gem. What is done is that

00:42:39

when the people talk about this and their motivation is raised, they

00:42:45

say that they should postpone the judgment and wait until the final decision is made. This is a tactic to

00:42:47

tie the mouths, hands, and feet of the citizens and manipulate the truth.

00:42:52

They said that when they had an advantage. But we all

00:42:55

have the freedom to get information and make decisions now.

00:42:57

We are not fools.

00:42:59

Do the people judge everything? But if the

00:43:02

law goes back and forth like this without clearly establishing the principles,

00:43:04

the people will suffer. People are confused,

00:43:06

but they actively

00:43:08

used it to get the case dismissed, but it was dismissed for some strange reason, and

00:43:10

then suddenly they

00:43:12

went so far as to claim innocence. It's

00:43:14

really disrespectful to the people.

00:43:22

When I think about the impact of each and every one of them, I hope that the judge in the judiciary

00:43:27

will think once more that what I have is not authority, but responsibility. That's a very good

00:43:29

word. Now, the third and

00:43:31

next topic are now in the political world. It's

00:43:34

politics anyway. Since you said that, first of all, if you look at the bureau a little more than the Democratic Party, the

00:43:36

Democratic Party

00:43:43

has about two of them. If there is no time, I will deal with the Inhak New Party for a while, and if there is no time,

00:43:46

I will say something absurd today. Democratic Party. Wow,

00:43:50

this is really what makes me so angry

00:43:53

about the law on treating people of democratic merit.

00:43:56

It's like this, it's been a long time, a long time,

00:44:00

now, in 1999, the Democratic Movement Compensation Act was enacted. The number of

00:44:03

people who received compensation was

00:44:06

9,844. About 9,8 and 44 people have already

00:44:10

received all the compensation. But

00:44:14

there are 829 people among them. 829 people are considered meritorious to democracy. This

00:44:21

is the law that we are trying to make this time.

00:44:22

In the past, close to 10,000 people

00:44:25

were compensated, and

00:44:26

this time, if you become a person of merit,

00:44:28

especially if you become a person of 829 merit, this includes inheritance.

00:44:31

Some parts were omitted this time, but

00:44:34

the law can be revised at any time.

00:44:36

It is education. It's a huge

00:44:40

law called employment, but the name of the law is 'Democratic Merit'.

00:44:44

Yewooa. But when making the law, make it the most

00:44:48

undemocratic. No, the democratic merit

00:44:51

law should be made democratic. Why are

00:44:53

you making it a steal? The current agenda coordinator is

00:44:57

originally the three Democratic Party, and the three opponents are

00:45:17

pickles. So, in my opinion, this is

00:45:20

not the first attempt at legislation. There

00:45:22

was a lot of controversy before, and

00:45:26

I was surprised that they were constantly trying to do this now. Last time,

00:45:28

when this was thwarted, I thought they would just not

00:45:30

do it anymore, but this time I was surprised.

00:45:32

Well, I'm really trying to remember this.

00:45:34

Then, it's right that we have to proceed with procedural legitimacy and sufficiently

00:45:37

check the public opinion, and

00:45:45

if we make it so that there are procedural problems like this, it's impossible to know how the list is

00:45:49

operated. It's

00:45:50

done. So, I do

00:45:52

n't know who does what and how.

00:45:53

Minister Park Min-sik said that he gave out the data in the dark. How

00:45:54

can it be like this?

00:45:57

Ultimately, this is paid for through the people's

00:45:59

tax money,

00:46:01

so who selects it and who selects it? There is a

00:46:08

problem like why do people not have the opportunity to verify it? I think that in

00:46:12

order for this to be passed so easily, we must give some respect and evaluate those who have

00:46:16

sacrificed for something or left behind some achievements.

00:46:20

But

00:46:23

if there is such a brilliant achievement,

00:46:25

shouldn't all of our citizens know about it?

00:46:27

We should be able to praise it and accept it, but

00:46:28

why is it that

00:46:32

when someone says it's true because we see it, others think it's just that?

00:46:35

Aren't we the people? Any citizen can do whatever

00:46:37

they want, and some can do it.

00:46:39

Even though the people do not want it, should we just pay taxes and

00:46:41

provide the financial resources? I

00:46:51

think that the legitimacy of this itself is very weak, and that pushing it forward is an admission of its own lack of legitimacy. If I

00:46:52

really understand it, The people

00:46:54

would rather have taken the lead and told them to take the lead.

00:47:04

I think there would be some public resistance to pushing this forward again when nothing has been persuaded or explained about the problems so far. So,

00:47:06

according to this law, this

00:47:08

is the current line. This bill is the Ministry of Culture. If you go in, the

00:47:12

South Korean National Liberation Front's

00:47:16

Namminjeon is famous in 1979. In 1984, the

00:47:19

Seoul National University fraud incident was followed by the police's

00:47:22

flaming wall-throwing seven people. I vividly remember the Dong-il University incident, and

00:47:26

these people can also become meritorious people.

00:47:32

Park Sun, who received it, can also become a Confucius.

00:47:35

In this way, even if I

00:47:38

ask for information on the records of Minister Park of the 829 people, he

00:47:41

refused it. I

00:47:44

know that it is him.

00:47:47

I don't know where this interest really is, but he is a Gwangju Confucius.

00:47:50

But as far as I know, he is the principal. If I were to go

00:47:52

to 0 and

00:47:56

get hit by even one stone, I would have been shocked, but the

00:47:59

Kim Dae-jung civil war incident is a different

00:48:01

story. At least for this to

00:48:05

become the Gwangju democratic movement, wouldn't it be possible to go out to Geumnam-ro and

00:48:07

throw a rock or fire and get

00:48:09

hit by something? But

00:48:12

this time, it's completely almost like this. I

00:48:15

agree with spies and civil servants being killed.

00:48:20

Isn't this a person of merit? It costs the people's tax money, right? I just want to put it

00:48:23

briefly. The people who

00:48:24

have contributed to the main movement are

00:48:27

all the people. To all of the people, someone

00:48:33

else is responsible for that, just like I did it alone. Connecting that sacrifice to my economic

00:48:36

gain is

00:48:38

unfair in itself. If all the people

00:48:41

thought of themselves as meritorious people, would they do that?

00:48:43

So, now I

00:48:45

have a person of merit that I am following.

00:48:51

Governor Kim Soo, but it's

00:48:54

difficult. Governor Kim Moon-soo always rides the entire car and

00:48:56

lives on 1 million won. But

00:49:01

how can I afford to eat and take a taxi? But

00:49:03

these people did not receive that money because they were meritorious people.

00:49:05

Now, when I look at the statistics, I see that

00:49:08

4,988 people related to money have received compensation for living expenses.

00:49:12

They gave 900 million to 11.9 billion, but they didn't even

00:49:15

give long-term tickets to Kim Moon-soo, a person of real merit.

00:49:17

This makes me faint. This is how I

00:49:20

see it. Yes, if they were really

00:49:24

strict about spending taxes, I think there

00:49:26

wouldn't be a problem like this if they just followed that one principle.

00:49:27

So, that's another

00:49:29

absurdity of the Democratic Party. We discussed this earlier, but

00:49:32

no, there is torture.

00:49:36

Two people who tortured and now killed people have

00:49:39

also been nominated. A

00:49:41

representative example is Eui-chan Jeong at first. This person,

00:49:44

Eui-chan Chung,

00:49:47

was the student chairman of Chosun University while serving as the male student chairman. At that time, he was

00:49:50

called Jong-kwon Lee. You know, the one who swindled a civilian and

00:49:54

beat him to death in an inn.

00:49:56

Chan passed the qualification screening for 5 years, and

00:49:59

then

00:50:01

our subak Kang-bae, who appears a lot these days, just posted it.

00:50:03

Commissioner Kang Commissioner Kang was not directly fueled, but

00:50:08

Lee Seok is a civilian and that advisor.

00:50:15

Will he be punished under the National Security Act for becoming the chairman of a young man immediately after killing someone? Does

00:50:19

this make sense? Those involved in this kind of torture are guilty. It

00:50:22

makes no sense. Choosing a representative for the people right now is

00:50:24

really the

00:50:27

right person to represent in every way. They say they are human, so they should

00:50:29

gather their opinions and

00:50:31

bring them up. This is being written very strangely now. They

00:50:34

represent a certain camp,

00:50:36

or rather, if there is a criminal problem, they will restore their reputation. They are

00:50:39

using the election strangely like this, and in the meantime, they are

00:50:41

not even filtering out these people.

00:50:44

Who is he close to? Now, there is talk about Lee Jae-myeong and things like

00:50:46

that. So, for that

00:50:48

reason, shouldn't people like this enter the political world?

00:50:49

Our common sense tells us that

00:50:52

even with a drunk driving regime, shouldn't this person grow up?

00:50:54

Well, it's not here yet. No, a

00:50:57

person died and he was tortured to death. He was

00:51:00

found guilty of a crime. I wonder

00:51:02

if he could do something like this.

00:51:04

And now, the

00:51:06

Democratic Party talks about the democratization movement as

00:51:09

if it were their exclusive property,

00:51:11

but that means that regardless of faction, all

00:51:13

citizens are meritorious and all citizens' achievements are.

00:51:16

So, it is not right to say that it is their exclusive property, but

00:51:18

I

00:51:26

went there often when the Park Jong-cheol torture case occurred. Now, it

00:51:28

was close to my house, so I went there and

00:51:31

saw the torture scene and saw the photos. I

00:51:33

have the photos from that time.

00:51:36

When there was a protest over the torture-to-death case, there was a

00:51:43

scene where citizens came out and protested holding pickets saying, "Don't

00:51:45

torture, don't hit," and I cried so hard when I saw that. But if you

00:51:50

think about the intentions of those citizens who came out innocently, saying, "Don't torture and don't hit," Is it possible for a

00:51:54

person who was involved in the democratic movement to

00:51:57

beat a person to death by accusing him of being a

00:51:59

fraud? If he did the same thing that attacked him and called him a monster,

00:52:01

he would be a monster too. That's

00:52:04

right. It's really surprising that he could do something like this to a person, but

00:52:06

that's the

00:52:09

right thing to do now. It can't pass the screening.

00:52:11

This is a serious problem because it represents the standards of the Democratic Party.

00:52:18

That's why, now that we're canceling torture, there's

00:52:20

another guy who comes to mind.

00:52:22

Oh, we've got a good guy. If he gets

00:52:24

60 years old, I'll rot.

00:52:28

When the SIM was a member of the Association,

00:52:31

there was a case of torture and death. Ah, it wasn't a case of

00:52:32

death. It was a case of torture. That's when the complaint

00:52:36

was written. There are

00:52:39

a lot of people like that now, but the problem is

00:52:42

these people who committed the case of death by torture. Isn't that Jae-myung Lee's assistant?

00:52:46

But I can't ignore the interest. Hey,

00:52:49

Lee Jae-myung is one

00:52:50

of the criminals, and he is the

00:52:55

one who has been accused of breaking the news and impersonating the prosecutor.

00:52:57

And if you break it

00:53:00

down into 10 cases that are being tried now, then you will

00:53:02

receive all the nominations and we only have one case, and

00:53:04

we also have civil affairs. While driving, we

00:53:08

thought we were going to kill him on purpose, so we hit him by mistake and ended up like this. Hey

00:53:11

Jae-myung Lee, you go out and say ours. Jae-myung Lee is saying that he will

00:53:14

protest or reexamine this again. Will

00:53:16

this be filtered out or

00:53:19

will it be corrected? No way, no matter how

00:53:22

bad it is, no way,

00:53:24

Until now, the last faith I have as a human being, I

00:53:31

guess it really hasn't been ruined to this extent. Now the

00:53:33

Orthodox Democratic Party has changed a lot, but

00:53:36

the purpose of winning the general election bulletproof is

00:53:39

clear.

00:53:40

Since he is a person who acts according to that purpose, I can't believe

00:53:42

this. I think so, but there have been so many times when my

00:53:45

innocent belief has been denied, so

00:53:47

I just

00:53:51

want to stop at this point of nonsense. I just want to say this.

00:53:53

Then, because of the time, I

00:53:56

have just one more question. Now,

00:53:59

Nak-yeon Lee will probably report exclusively today. If you look at it, they are

00:54:04

saying that the party will be founded around January 15th. Now, it is just that

00:54:07

those in active duty will not try to follow if possible,

00:54:09

but later on, if there is a cut-off or it is

00:54:12

impossible, they can follow, but

00:54:14

now, as for the academy, Tae-seop Geum and Young-ja Yang will

00:54:17

set up a big tent and I will check.

00:54:20

Looking at it, he is not joining hands with Lee Jun-seok,

00:54:22

but he can attract Yoo Seung-min. As of

00:54:34

now, in Yoo Seung-min's constituency, there is a high possibility of failure.

00:54:36

I predicted that a new party for Lee Nak-yeon will emerge.

00:54:40

I also said it on broadcast, because it is true. The

00:54:43

former representative of Hak-yeon is a member of the Democratic Party. I ca

00:54:46

n't remain. The Democratic Party of today

00:54:49

is not the orthodox Democratic Party of the past. I cannot stand together with the representative of the Academy and Research Institute,

00:54:51

and among them, the representative Jae-Myung Lee. The representative Jae-Myung Lee

00:54:55

and the representative of the Hak Kyung-Kyung Party are

00:54:57

almost like enemies to each other. They are

00:54:59

not that person.

00:55:02

Representative Lee Jae-myung

00:55:05

will not take any action to force Nak-yeon Lee to sit in the relationship,

00:55:07

so he is using an isolation strategy.

00:55:08

The other prime ministers are meeting now, so they are

00:55:10

making an appointment to meet, so

00:55:12

I am setting the most miserable example. Since they

00:55:15

have joined forces with other people, they will

00:55:17

no longer meet this person. Then, when they become isolated and

00:55:19

bounce off to the new party, if

00:55:21

they see them ruined, they

00:55:23

will stick to their side even more. The

00:55:24

Democratic Party will become more of an evil party.

00:55:27

Nevertheless, Representative In Ha-yeon cannot help but make a choice.

00:55:29

No. That's why I had

00:55:31

already predicted that I would leave, and

00:55:33

even if I stayed, there

00:55:34

would be no next opportunity, right. So,

00:55:37

as for leaving like this, it's

00:55:39

okay to actually go out, but if I go out in

00:55:42

January, a ruling on Mr. Kim Min-seop or something like this will

00:55:45

come out.

00:55:48

It's okay if the timing is just right, but

00:55:51

I think CEO Lee Hak-yeon is aiming for two things. First of all,

00:55:53

you have to excel like this. Because the reason I

00:55:56

waited for the situation to become a situation where I had no choice but to do it was

00:56:00

because I waited for that once when CEO Lee Jae-myeong received a warrant.

00:56:02

When I returned to Korea in June, I was interviewed as if I was going to do something big, and I was like, "

00:56:06

Oh, why are you making such a strong statement? What are you going to say?", but

00:56:08

suddenly it

00:56:09

became quiet and I was like, "What are you going to do?"

00:56:11

In my view,

00:56:14

Representative Lee Nak-yeon said that Representative Lee Jae-myeong had a warrant issued.

00:56:16

I think I thought it would work, but I said that if it

00:56:17

was issued and the Democratic Party

00:56:19

fell into chaos, I would

00:56:21

come back and take control now, but

00:56:23

this is what happened. But

00:56:26

then there is no time anymore.

00:56:27

Now, now, now, once the election passes.

00:56:29

Completely retired. So, there is

00:56:32

nothing we can do about Lee Hak-hyun's side now. If you say that you have to die for the cause, it

00:56:39

has no destructive power in itself, so it becomes meaningless.

00:56:40

So, you have to set up the big tent first.

00:56:42

Others will

00:56:44

come later. So now, what about other

00:56:46

people, Rep. Lee Won-wook and

00:56:48

others, why are they so fast? But

00:56:50

now, they are taking a little more of a wait-and-see approach, wondering if they

00:56:54

might get a chance to be nominated because of the internal noise about nominations, but

00:56:56

Representative Inhak.

00:56:58

I'm not in a position to nominate people right now.

00:57:00

That's not the case right now. So, if I want to pitch a tent, I

00:57:01

have to go out and pitch it first. So,

00:57:05

I had no choice but to come like this due to the unavoidable situation, and now in January, as a result of the

00:57:09

conclusion of those judicial risk cases,

00:57:12

this is going to be a boom. I look forward to this. You

00:57:14

seem to be doing it, but I really don't care about that. The

00:57:17

current situation itself has destructive power. I do

00:57:19

n't see it this way, but even in mid-January, I'm wondering if

00:57:22

something has changed in the creation of heaven and earth. That's right.

00:57:25

Now, as the last runner,

00:57:28

the people are assessing and now I'm just

00:57:31

asking a few questions about the lawyer's personal issues. I will do it.

00:57:33

I am famous for being punctual with the people, but

00:57:36

today Jae-myung Lee is too picky,

00:57:38

so I have to wait a little longer, but if I just

00:57:40

add the afternoon, first of all, today, today,

00:57:44

we held an emergency resolution meeting. Now,

00:57:51

if you look at the emergency committee chairman, the most popular thing and everything, he is completely

00:57:55

behind. There is someone who is pushing Han Dong-hoon to become the

00:57:57

emergency committee chairman, and then Minister Han Dong-hoon, but since the

00:58:01

emergency committee chairman is not ready to use his sword,

00:58:10

an opinion was raised that we should make him the election committee chairman for a little protection, and that the emergency committee chairman should be Inwon-dong, who has a bit of political experience.

00:58:18

There was even talk about Kim Han-gil, whom President Yoon Seok-il personally trusted. However, the anti-conservative spirit is a bit

00:58:21

strong. This person has not done anything to the conservatives.

00:58:26

There are some who want to push for independence once again, but personally,

00:58:28

who should be the head of the emergency room? I am

00:58:31

at least the

00:58:34

director. Management Yes, I think so.

00:58:37

First of all, Chairman Kim Han-gil is great,

00:58:40

but in conservatives, color is

00:58:44

really important. If he took charge and

00:58:48

made a decision related to nomination, those who cannot get nomination would use

00:58:51

that excuse to go out and do something. I'm

00:58:55

running again, and now this kind of

00:58:56

conflict will only get bigger.

00:58:58

There's no need to make excuses. That's why we

00:59:03

need someone with a clear color to keep the conservative party strong, and I think this

00:59:05

election has no choice but to be held with a two-top system between Minister Won Il-yong and Minister Han Dong-hoon.

00:59:10

That's right, it has to be handled by the two of you.

00:59:12

But

00:59:15

Han Dong-won is

00:59:18

too busy with his current schedule to step up to the emergency committee chair position,

00:59:21

and he

00:59:25

has to sort out the chaos inside now.

00:59:29

It's going to be extreme again, but someone who has been through that and

00:59:32

has that kind of relationship

00:59:35

should do it, so it would be a little smoother. It's

00:59:40

true that Minister Han Dong-hoon is a national star, but his networking with each member of the National Assembly is

00:59:43

still perfectly formed.

00:59:44

It's hard to see it this way, and Won Il-yong Since the Minister

00:59:49

has served in the party several times, coordination

00:59:51

is possible, but when Minister Han Dong-hoon

00:59:54

comes up with an inside attack about it, it

01:00:01

can be a bit hurtful for Minister Han Dong-hoon to appear to have some trouble with it. They are

01:00:03

going to attack old books and there is

01:00:08

no need to use Minister Han Dong-hoon like that. They should not cause harm.

01:00:10

And Minister Han Dong-hoon has

01:00:13

this image of representing the camp. But if

01:00:16

the person representing the camp

01:00:18

has this image of fighting internally as well, that

01:00:21

in itself will create an image for the entire nation. It's going to be

01:00:23

cut down a bit and it's going to be greatly amplified over there,

01:00:27

so in order for things to go smoothly, I'll

01:00:30

end up having to hit the two of them in the face, but

01:00:32

still, isn't it something like this, Won Il's emergency captain, Han Dong-hoon, or something like that?

01:00:35

I also recommended Yoon Jae to the National Assembly, but

01:00:40

first of all, it's a word of mouth

01:00:43

thing. This is a bloody thing.

01:00:46

There is political experience, and Minister Won is also a three-term

01:00:48

righteousness guru, so he said, “Let’s do a bit of word of mouth,” and

01:00:52

then “Shine.” This is

01:00:55

vivid, and this is a good thing. But if

01:00:57

Minister Han Dong-hoon

01:00:59

takes over as the chairman of the campaign committee, then I would

01:01:02

rather be the chairman of the emergency committee or space.

01:01:05

The chairman is something like the Yeouido nomination knife.

01:01:07

Then, the

01:01:10

one who can also use the Yeouido dialect is now

01:01:12

Minister Won Won-dong, and then the 50 million

01:01:15

languages that are in charge of the whole thing. This

01:01:17

is Minister Han Dong-hoon.

01:01:19

This is a fantastic two-top, right?

01:01:21

That's right, me too, so what you're saying is

01:01:23

correct, but both of them are

01:01:25

Gujun's work. So,

01:01:30

which one is suitable for the Gujun job within the party, and

01:01:33

which one is suitable for dealing with the people? The

01:01:35

popularity is towards Minister Han Dong-hoon,

01:01:38

and he. Since

01:01:41

Minister Han Dong-hoon is more suitable for the job of traveling around the country to conduct elections,

01:01:43

I think that doing both of them now will be the

01:01:45

best way to

01:01:48

maximize it.

01:01:50

Then, one more thing. Let's

01:01:53

go to Representative Kim. If I had argued at first,

01:01:57

just I have to put down one. I

01:01:59

can't get enough of both. I just said that if

01:02:02

I put down Ulsan, I can at least keep the party leader.

01:02:04

But in the end, I was

01:02:07

obsessed with Ulsan, and now I put down the party leader.

01:02:11

But this time, I got three

01:02:14

things wrong. Timing is the leader.

01:02:32

They should have thrown both of them away, and now

01:02:34

they should have thrown them both away. Hey, Kim Ki-hyun

01:02:37

is amazing. He will be the prime minister in the future and

01:02:39

become a presidential candidate next time. But

01:02:43

if he throws a representative figure in a half-hearted way and becomes obsessed with Ulsan, he will not be nominated again.

01:02:46

This is the second problem and the

01:02:48

last is the family problem. Why are you meeting Lee Jun-seok? Even

01:02:50

if you have an appointment, you can cancel it. Even

01:02:56

if I

01:03:02

cancel my appointment with Representative Kim twice, isn't that okay? If Lee Jun-seok meets with me, I

01:03:08

may stand in solidarity with Lee Jun-seok, who is likely to run as an independent. Is

01:03:10

n't this a protest? I see it this way, Kim Ki.

01:03:13

How should we look at the Ulsan representative nomination?

01:03:15

Ah, it has become much more difficult, and

01:03:17

that is what he himself created. That

01:03:20

political power is not given to you by anyone. It is

01:03:22

not spoon-fed to you.

01:03:26

Political power is to coordinate with each other like this, give and take, and make things happen.

01:03:29

If you wanted to protect even one of these things,

01:03:32

you should have made it yourself and taken action a long time ago, but at

01:03:34

this point, no matter what you

01:03:37

do, you can't protect anything.

01:03:41

If you thought you could protect anything in this situation,

01:03:44

you made a mistake in judging the situation. I think

01:03:46

this is a bit disappointing,

01:03:48

and the fact that he met Lee Jun-seok in such a bad way at the end was

01:03:54

so naive that he knew he would be taken advantage of due to his great defeat.

01:03:59

I feel like it's too urgent, so I do

01:04:04

n't think he's calculated this or that properly. Former leader Lee Jun-seok is also trying his

01:04:09

best to continue his political career, so where can we trust him?

01:04:11

He's always been recording things and releasing them to the media

01:04:13

right away, is

01:04:14

n't he? Is it different? He just revealed the fact that they met, so

01:04:17

CEO Kim Ki-heon was surprised and

01:04:19

posted his resignation letter on social media. But

01:04:24

it is naive in the political field to not know that you will be used like that, and it is wrong in the political field.

01:04:31

That's all he

01:04:33

wants to talk about. Even

01:04:34

though he's the CEO, he's shaken. What's this? He's talking about

01:04:36

himself.

01:04:38

If he wanted to protect CEO Ki-heon Kim and lift him up, he

01:04:40

shouldn't reveal the fact that they met.

01:04:43

But CEO Ki-heon Kim is

01:04:46

protecting at least one thing of his. What I was trying to do was

01:04:58

to think that if people like Lee Jun-seok and others could solve the problems within this party, I would have a cause to protect.

01:05:07

I think I was trying to protect at least one thing in the name of putting everything together, but that's too naive. If

01:05:10

you want to do that, you should have

01:05:13

thought about it a long time ago and trusted someone you can trust. It's

01:05:17

a shame in many ways, but

01:05:19

it's a shame that the political world missed that timing.

01:05:24

Oh, that's just a sin that can't be washed away.

01:05:26

This is something that I brought about,

01:05:29

so I

01:05:31

feel like I'm in a very difficult situation. The real last question is

01:05:33

Koo Ja-yong's special personal question. Now,

01:05:36

this is the first recruitment of our people's doctor, Inje.

01:05:38

Five people have been brought in. Do I

01:05:41

just give individual scores for each broadcast? I just give the

01:05:43

five people a combined score of 500. This

01:05:49

must have been a big decision in the future, but they say they ca

01:05:51

n't reveal the area yet, but you know roughly

01:05:54

where the elementary, middle, and high schools are, and

01:05:55

where they live. I know where

01:05:57

you live, so you can tell

01:06:00

by looking at the internet. However,

01:06:02

due to the local situation, I can't reveal my constituency yet.

01:06:05

But what kind of politics do you want to try in the future?

01:06:08

Lastly, please tell me your aspirations.

01:06:10

Actually, I don't want to

01:06:12

reveal myself like this or anything like that.

01:06:14

No, so it

01:06:17

's been a very long time since I was first offered it.

01:06:18

It's been about 6 months. I had a lot of worries during those 6 months, but

01:06:23

I also lost

01:06:25

a lot of weight during that time. I was very stressed out, so I worked a lot of overtime while working and

01:06:27

didn't live well, so I started

01:06:30

doing it last year. I suddenly gained weight by running 7km.

01:06:32

However, the hospital said that it is

01:06:34

not good for the body to gain weight so rapidly and that it is

01:06:36

dangerous.

01:06:41

While I was contemplating for 6 months whether to accept this recruitment or not, I tried to go on a diet, but I could

01:06:43

n't do it, but I

01:06:45

lost the weight. So they say the

01:06:48

people are always right, and it's true. The

01:06:50

people are even telling me to diet. I

01:06:52

was really surprised, but

01:06:55

now I guess I can't help it. The

01:06:59

first thing I did was to keep trust in what I said. If I miss this opportunity, I don't want to do

01:07:03

anything wrong to the country. How much would I blame myself if something happened? I was

01:07:05

really afraid of this at first and if

01:07:07

I didn't move this time,

01:07:10

I would ask someone else to do this, please do that, do this, do that.

01:07:17

In my heart, I thought, oh, hypocrite,

01:07:20

hypocrite, coward, coward, I was going to

01:07:22

blame that person like this. Now, I

01:07:24

can't help this situation.

01:07:26

There was a bit of a shameful side to it, but now I just

01:07:28

threw everything. Well, I can't help it.

01:07:30

Now I just threw everything.

01:07:32

This isn't my choice or my

01:07:35

problem. I

01:07:38

decided to do it in case I didn't do it, but

01:07:40

I didn't want to do it in a haphazard way, so

01:07:43

now a lot of people have actually come to me. They even

01:07:45

come to my house and

01:07:47

come to my house to persuade me. He also did it and said

01:07:49

things like this, but every time, I wondered

01:07:51

what the heck he was saying, but if someone's ruin

01:07:54

is reflected in me even for a moment,

01:07:56

I should do my best about it.

01:07:57

Now, this was the opportunity to make this decision, and

01:08:00

the district is thinking about it now.

01:08:04

There may be some coordination with the team or something like that, but

01:08:06

I am recommending it as the first recruit, so the

01:08:10

recruiter came when the atmosphere was really good at the time.

01:08:12

But now it

01:08:13

has become more difficult, so

01:08:16

I hesitated a little when announcing the recruitment. Well, at a time like this,

01:08:18

there was a lot of fuss. I was saying that I really had to announce it next year,

01:08:20

but then now I

01:08:23

can get very good conditions. In fact,

01:08:24

you know, but I have a

01:08:26

few regional studies and I do

01:08:28

n't want to take it easy while I'm at it, so

01:08:31

I'm contributing. Since I have decided to do it, I want to do something that can

01:08:35

win at least one place where the Democratic Party is active. I

01:08:39

want to do that, and I am setting my goal like that.

01:08:42

First of all, my heart is like that.

01:08:44

Yes, I have been

01:08:47

good at broadcasting for a long time now, and every time I see Koo Ja-ryong,

01:08:49

I It

01:08:52

reminded me of Handong from Joseon. Dong is the best in Joseon and the most

01:08:55

tongue-in-cheek in Joseon. In my view, people like this who are as eloquent as Koo Ja-ryong in the broadcasting industry

01:09:01

ask more questions, and this makes a

01:09:04

good impression. I really like the

01:09:10

great impression of lawyer Koo Ja-yong who, along with Han Dong-hoon, will save the people this time.

01:09:13

I'm looking forward to the role. You

01:09:17

can tell me as much as you want today. No, it's just that

01:09:19

the atmosphere here is good. Actually, it has

01:09:24

n't been that long since I was on the air, but people around me have

01:09:26

given me very positive evaluations, so are you

01:09:28

recommending a candidate for that public office and sending it to me?

01:09:31

There was also one thing, and there was also something like, would

01:09:34

you like to host a program on that broadcast?

01:09:36

Actually, it's

01:09:37

really good for me as an individual, but I'm

01:09:40

wondering how I ended up like this.

01:09:42

But in the end, it was

01:09:45

n't my choice, it was a decision of many people.

01:09:48

Hope was placed in me and I followed the lead. I

01:09:52

think this is fate in the end. I did

01:09:54

n't make a choice to become better for myself,

01:09:57

but since I decided to do it,

01:10:01

I will do it desperately for someone else. It is a

01:10:04

choice for that individual. No, I

01:10:05

really

01:10:09

want to tell you this. I'll just give you some information and

01:10:12

tell you the broadcast schedule for the following week. On

01:10:14

Monday, I have the Avengers in my city,

01:10:17

so now I have no choice but to

01:10:23

go live for an hour with Attorney Jeong Hyeok-jin at 1 o'clock. And

01:10:25

then there's the Avengers, and

01:10:27

then there's a special broadcast on Tuesday.

01:10:29

I'm going to brighten up history right away, so I'll

01:10:31

watch it right away. Jeong Yu-ra, our Choi

01:10:34

Choi-won has a daughter, Jeong Yu-ra.

01:10:36

This person is taking care of various aspects of

01:10:40

correcting history. I will be watching

01:10:43

live from 11 am to 11 am, and

01:10:45

I will be giving the questionnaire in advance, so

01:10:47

it will be live from 11 am to 12 pm. Then, on Wednesday, it will be broadcast live from 11 am to 12 pm.

01:10:50

Then, on Wednesday, it will be broadcast live.

01:10:52

Spokesperson Yoon Ki-cheon, this is the

01:10:55

calm person of Anyang. Representative Ki-chan Yoon, who is running this time. On

01:10:58

Wednesday and then on Friday,

01:11:04

there is a broadcast of Song Kwon's solo politics, so please watch a lot next week. I am

01:11:06

so grateful to the lawyer today.

01:11:09

Ah, I am

01:11:11

grateful. Now, lawyer Seo Jeong

01:11:14

has a very strong force. I can't do it with

01:11:16

that.

01:11:18

Because you gave me an offer I couldn't refuse, I

01:11:20

actually declined other broadcasts or

01:11:22

something like that in order to appear here, but I have

01:11:27

digested those broadcasts as promised and am now here.

01:11:29

Everything I've done on YouTube recently has been done by

01:11:30

lawyer Seo Jong-wook. That's because, as my legal

01:11:33

senior, I've already made a prediction. Yes,

01:11:35

thank you for watching. Thank you.

01:11:43

[Music]

01:11:48

Thank you.

Description:

1. 미리보는 이재명 판결 4개 2. 송영길, 유창훈이라도 구속 3. 이낙연 신당 출범시기와 참여자들 4. 국힘 비대위원장은? 한동훈 역할론 12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사와 함께 합니다.

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "12월 15일 오후 3시 서정욱의 뉴스라이브는 구자룡 변호사님과 함께 라이브로 생방송 시작합니다. ㅣ 서정욱의 뉴스라이브 ㅣ 멸콩TV"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.