Download "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?"

Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.

Next video: Три АДА. ПРОВЕРКА на ПРОЧНОСТЬ

Три АДА. ПРОВЕРКА на ПРОЧНОСТЬ

Три АДА. ПРОВЕРКА на ПРОЧНОСТЬ

Channel: СВОБОДА В заКОНе

юрист

особо опасный юрист

юрист против

юрист земцов

юрист кропоткин

судебная практика

юридическая помощь

юридические услуги

нарушение прав

сергей земцов

авторский канал

Lawyer

фсб

полиция

мвд

прокуратура

администрация

расследование

оою

земцов

депутат земцов

Гулькевичский отдел СК СУ по КК

Крикунов руководитель СК в г. Гулькевичи

прокурор Рахвалов

00:00:01

management of the chronic disease facility of the

00:00:04

Russian Federation in the Krasnodar

00:00:06

Territory did not listen to

00:00:10

those notified in a proper manner

00:00:14

to the participants of the white

00:00:17

read it is possible to consider

00:00:23

[applause]

00:00:40

complaints supporting

00:00:42

briefly I would like to dwell on the

00:00:45

following

00:00:47

means

00:00:49

June 23, 2022 Martynov by

00:00:54

proxy Viktor Dmitrievich Martynov

00:00:57

filed Gulkevich

00:01:00

cases reports of a crime in fact

00:01:03

issuance of obviously unjust

00:01:06

judicial acts by the magistrate Fondonetskaya

00:01:09

under Article 305 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation falsification of

00:01:13

evidence Gorshkov Unified State Examination by the

00:01:15

representative for Rostelecom in

00:01:17

civil case number 11

00:01:20

12/2002 magistrate judge of the court district

00:01:23

number 133 Fondonetskaya under Article 303 of the Criminal Code

00:01:26

of the Russian Federation Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as well as employees

00:01:30

under the article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the

00:01:35

bailiffs of the performer Gulkevichsky showed

00:01:38

signs of a crime under Article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

00:01:43

However, this message about the

00:01:45

crime was stamped as

00:01:48

incoming. So

00:01:55

no registration was made in the KRSP

00:02:00

[music]

00:02:02

Martynov And no one questioned Martynov for any

00:02:07

procedural decision in their

00:02:11

the address was not sent, the

00:02:14

deadlines in accordance with Article 144 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation

00:02:19

for making a decision,

00:02:23

the procedural decision has expired, no

00:02:26

decisions have been made to extend the period of

00:02:29

inspection, and the investigative committee has not been sent to our address. The

00:02:34

Gulkevichi department of the

00:02:36

investigative committee of the Investigative

00:02:38

Department for the Krasnodar Territory generally

00:02:41

refuses anything or explains about the fate of

00:02:45

this message of a crime That is,

00:02:49

as if they wrote and that’s all On this,

00:02:52

that is, the

00:02:55

circumstances of the commission of the crime are

00:02:59

all provided by us, for example,

00:03:04

about collection Rus appealed to the magistrate’s court of

00:03:08

judicial district number 133 Fontanetskaya

00:03:11

Recovery from Viktor Dmitrievich Martynov of

00:03:14

funds in the amount

00:03:17

72 thousand rubles was issued, a court

00:03:21

order was issued to Fontanetskoy; in the future, for

00:03:24

collection, the Rus sent a statement to

00:03:26

Fontanetskoy stating that they had

00:03:29

falsified both the debt and

00:03:31

the name of the agreement and asked to change, that

00:03:34

is, the judge immediately with the views. However, the judge

00:03:37

of Fontonitsky indicated, go collect,

00:03:39

that is, she refused this and the Warrior Braid

00:03:43

knowingly that the

00:03:46

court order was illegal, they

00:03:49

surrendered to the bailiff who

00:03:53

turned Martynov’s funds into her,

00:03:56

writing off these sums of money

00:03:59

after submitting an application to the investigative

00:04:02

committee

00:04:03

for Gulkevichsky on the fact of the crime, there

00:04:08

was no reaction, no response,

00:04:11

but the

00:04:13

bailiffs returned part of the funds

00:04:16

to Martynov’s account for At this time,

00:04:19

Martynov canceled this court order

00:04:21

as illegal. However, we believe that

00:04:24

the crime is completed, the

00:04:27

entire objective side of the crime is

00:04:30

confirmed by the materials of this

00:04:33

case, which we have included, this is

00:04:37

one episode in the future, a

00:04:40

representative of Rostelecom also, through

00:04:43

Judge Fontanetskaya, imitated a

00:04:46

debt allegedly for Internet services

00:04:51

falsified

00:04:53

the debt, presented false

00:04:56

documents and received a deliberately

00:05:00

unfair judicial act, a court

00:05:03

order giving a property right, we

00:05:05

canceled it later, the same

00:05:08

representative of Gorshkov, consistently

00:05:11

pursuing his intention to obtain a

00:05:13

deliberately unfair judicial act,

00:05:16

received a judgment in absentia, which we also

00:05:20

canceled, they were unable to bring the settlement amounts

00:05:23

to end to receive illegal actions

00:05:25

in the future, as we believe, Gorshkova

00:05:28

entered into a criminal conspiracy with the

00:05:31

justice of the peace Fontanetskaya, who had

00:05:35

previously issued judicial acts, the

00:05:38

rulings were issued by her, she issued a deliberately

00:05:41

unreasonable judicial act

00:05:44

allegedly not having a power of attorney for the pot and she had no

00:05:47

right to file a real one and to

00:05:49

terminate the case without examining the

00:05:51

evidence So Gorshkova, I

00:05:55

submitted an objection to the complaint that

00:05:58

we filed, again referring to the same

00:06:01

power of attorney that is in the

00:06:03

case materials. Where I asked for our complaint to be rejected.

00:06:06

That is, simply as something happens,

00:06:08

discrediting of the judiciary on the part of the

00:06:11

justice of the peace Fontanets

00:06:13

was canceled by the capillary court In the

00:06:16

case materials, there is a power of attorney from Gorshkova and

00:06:18

Gorshkova continued to participate with

00:06:21

submitting documents referring to the

00:06:23

same power of attorney and the magistrate court of the

00:06:27

Gulkevichi district subsequently

00:06:29

received documents where Gorshkova

00:06:32

falsified information to illegally

00:06:35

use Martynova’s personal data,

00:06:36

indicating each time different

00:06:39

personal accounts that supposedly pensioner

00:06:42

Martynova

00:06:43

voluntarily paid

00:06:46

Martynova’s debt didn’t pay, falsified,

00:06:48

too, an application was submitted, this is the next

00:06:52

episode,

00:06:55

accordingly,

00:06:56

all the documents have been provided,

00:06:59

everything has already been confirmed by court decisions, all the

00:07:04

circumstances have been studied, the

00:07:07

damage to

00:07:09

Martynov was caused,

00:07:12

printouts from bank accounts are available,

00:07:16

some of the funds were stolen.

00:07:18

These are what we consider to be the criminals who

00:07:21

have been compensated. How some of it is unclear

00:07:24

to this day and accordingly, to

00:07:27

stop this, as we consider

00:07:29

criminal activity, we turned to

00:07:33

law enforcement agencies for protection, that is,

00:07:35

the decision to initiate a criminal case

00:07:38

is within the powers of an authorized person,

00:07:41

since Martynova cannot engage in

00:07:44

arbitrariness and punish the perpetrators, and

00:07:46

so,

00:07:48

however, officials do

00:07:51

not perform this function,

00:07:54

accordingly in this regard we ask that the

00:07:57

inaction of the

00:08:00

Gulkevich department of the Investigative

00:08:02

Committee, the head of the loudmouths in

00:08:04

registering the KRSP report of a

00:08:07

crime on June 23, 2022, be declared illegal, that is,

00:08:10

that it was not registered as a

00:08:13

report of a crime so as not

00:08:15

to carry out any checks;

00:08:23

crime, it means that after

00:08:25

all, the investigator should have been

00:08:27

assigned to work, but since we did

00:08:30

not receive anything, his last name is unknown, this is

00:08:35

how we formulate

00:08:37

the requirements and send a resolution to

00:08:40

Martynov LV Martynov V.D to

00:08:42

extend the period of inspection, that is,

00:08:45

we indicated this point assuming that

00:08:48

perhaps they extended the

00:08:51

requirements that everything should be indicated in one complaint

00:08:55

3 we ask that the

00:08:58

investigator’s inaction, full name unknown, to

00:09:01

carry out verification activities on a

00:09:04

report of a crime, as indicated

00:09:08

in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court,

00:09:12

consideration of cases on a complaint in accordance with

00:09:14

Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the applicant has the right to

00:09:18

appeal the inaction of

00:09:21

officials persons who do not take

00:09:25

action to carry out an investigation into the

00:09:28

facts of the

00:09:29

crimes indicated by the report, that

00:09:32

this can be appealed accordingly,

00:09:33

if they do not do so, we ask that the

00:09:36

inaction be declared illegal;

00:09:48

June 2022, that

00:09:52

is, by submitting a report of a crime without

00:09:56

interfering with the activities of the investigation

00:10:00

since they are procedurally independent,

00:10:02

but we demand that we be given

00:10:05

one of the three decisions provided for by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation,

00:10:08

either to initiate a case or to

00:10:11

refuse to initiate a case, or to direct the

00:10:14

jurisdiction in our case,

00:10:17

no procedural decision in our

00:10:20

address has not been sent no uh we don’t know about this

00:10:24

further 5 please recognize as

00:10:28

illegal the inaction of the head of the

00:10:30

Gulkevich department of the Investigative

00:10:32

Committee Krikunov regarding the lack of

00:10:35

departmental control on the report of a

00:10:37

crime on June 23, 2022, that is, in

00:10:42

this requirement, since it is

00:10:45

within the powers of the head

00:10:48

as an

00:10:50

organization registration of a report of a

00:10:54

crime in the appropriate book,

00:10:56

since only after registration they

00:10:59

begin to make a procedural

00:11:03

decision, if they do not enter anything, then how

00:11:05

can they throw out the statement and the fact that, in

00:11:09

accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure,

00:11:11

departmental control over the legality of

00:11:14

decisions made over compliance with procedural

00:11:16

deadlines for reports of a crime

00:11:19

which itself the manager has the right to assign

00:11:22

his subordinate investigator to work,

00:11:25

and he does so, however, he does

00:11:29

not carry out this connection, for which we

00:11:31

filed a complaint with the court and so that the complaint

00:11:36

can now be considered fully and

00:11:38

comprehensively, we ask you to request inspection materials from the

00:11:42

Gulkevich department of the investigative

00:11:44

committee directly from the administration for the

00:11:46

Krasnodar Territory

00:11:48

according to the report of a crime on June 23,

00:11:52

2022, that is, according to our petitioner, the

00:11:56

fastest you have no documents, we just

00:11:59

hope that within the framework of the court we can

00:12:01

this is the only place to

00:12:03

see at least something, what has been done, what requests, what

00:12:07

answers, what decision was made, when, and so

00:12:11

on So without this, we cannot,

00:12:14

therefore, we ask this complaint

00:12:17

to satisfy these demands that

00:12:27

when you submitted a report of a crime,

00:12:30

you offered all the documents for which

00:12:33

come true

00:12:35

after reading your appeal, the

00:12:39

message with the receipt that was

00:12:41

attached in the complaint, I see a mark from the

00:12:43

committee accordingly that a

00:12:47

communication appeal was received from June 23, but it is indicated that

00:12:50

the application is not available. Although the application of

00:12:53

strong points,

00:12:55

dear court, look there,

00:12:59

when submitting a report of a crime,

00:13:04

we had a small conflict

00:13:07

with employees, that is, we came and wanted to

00:13:10

hand over photocopies, and so on and so forth,

00:13:12

here we have listed then

00:13:15

you ask yourself. But

00:13:20

they are not they took it, that is, well, when handing it in.

00:13:27

Well, a conflict arose when receiving a report

00:13:31

of a crime, that is, they refused

00:13:33

to warn about criminal

00:13:35

liability under 306. That is, as it

00:13:38

should be when accepting a report of

00:13:40

a crime, but just like leave it, and

00:13:42

so on. But we expected that we would

00:13:45

hand over the message as required by the Code of Criminal Procedure about the

00:13:48

crime What exactly did the investigator have to do with the

00:13:51

investigator on 306 so that the very fact of

00:13:57

accepting a report of a crime was

00:14:00

within the framework And since they

00:14:02

refused to do this, yes And like the office

00:14:05

stamp slapped and a conflict arose

00:14:07

that they are not investigators there later

00:14:10

someone will call you and so on, and based on the

00:14:13

conflict that arose, the

00:14:15

message was that the office did not come out

00:14:19

from Penkov,

00:14:23

he refused even

00:14:27

personal receptions everywhere, including

00:14:37

I asked him to leave the array

00:14:40

for 10 minutes to communicate, I brought coffee

00:14:42

documents He said that the originals were needed

00:14:50

[music]

00:14:51

I asked him Leave

00:14:54

a note that he did this earlier from a personal reception.

00:14:57

However, he refused me this,

00:14:59

everything is fine, he said your application

00:15:02

will be carried out

00:15:07

in this regard, I went to the office and there

00:15:10

my girlfriend understood. I wrote this

00:15:12

entry because he did not take feats from me.

00:15:14

not the subglaciers worked so that

00:15:18

he requested personally, so that he personally requested all the cases

00:15:21

and gave everyone documents I

00:15:27

already wanted to add, that is, here is a

00:15:30

message about the crime, it is

00:15:32

motivated and in the attachment from what

00:15:35

I indicated, we are applying it is important

00:15:37

to list the court order of Fontanets,

00:15:40

this is the illegal default judgment of

00:15:42

Fontanetskaya calculation of the debt of the

00:15:45

falsified court

00:15:47

order by Gorshkova in relation to Martynov and the application

00:15:50

for NK Sarus addressed to Fontanetskaya so Where is

00:15:52

this and the judge’s ruling on the refusal of

00:15:55

the application, he cash department Russian instructions

00:15:58

presents for the execution of the

00:16:00

falsified court order, as

00:16:02

well as 7 information from the enforcement

00:16:04

proceedings of Gulkevich’s theft of

00:16:06

Martin’s funds in favor on the website,

00:16:10

that is, when submitting a message, we

00:16:13

have each document in the original with a

00:16:17

living seal and so on from the shiva from the

00:16:21

materials of civil cases by Judge

00:16:23

Fantonitsky We have the

00:16:25

originals certified by the judge, but we are the

00:16:28

original, we received them, we did not want to

00:16:31

leave the original Here they are all shiva is there,

00:16:34

we did not want to leave the original to the investigator

00:16:36

because then we would not have

00:16:38

the originals left and the investigator could

00:16:41

treat or having photocopies he could, having already

00:16:46

familiarized himself with their contents, he

00:16:48

could already conclude that there is a basis for

00:16:52

verification, and so on, he could have already

00:16:54

requested, especially in each of this

00:16:56

the court order contains details of the

00:16:59

case number, date, from the person in charge, that

00:17:03

is, for carrying out the inspection, that is, we

00:17:06

provided everything that is necessary

00:17:09

since the period for making a decision is

00:17:11

still shortened according to the Transport Transport Code, we

00:17:14

provided everything, we are stitching together a large amount of

00:17:17

work. Well, it’s just that the

00:17:19

Investigative Committee is

00:17:22

like that they don’t want to

00:17:27

I fully support I’ll add a few

00:17:30

words that Judging by the pontoonist he carried out terror

00:17:34

against our family for 2

00:17:36

years I fought off no debt

00:17:40

they prove in relation to my mother this

00:17:43

has already been going on for three years I repeatedly

00:17:45

came to

00:17:47

court precinct 133 and talked Judging by

00:17:49

Donetskaya on the fact that he was sentenced a

00:17:52

court order

00:17:55

to collect 72 thousand from me illegally,

00:17:57

I draw your attention to

00:18:00

the person who is this disk, that there are three

00:18:07

contracts from different dates and from different

00:18:11

years, that is, three contracts

00:18:14

and Judging by that place, having studied at least if

00:18:17

she studied this case, she understood that under

00:18:19

which contract to collect a court

00:18:21

order it is indicated that and in the following of

00:18:25

them they themselves indicate that therefore the contract does

00:18:27

not need to let’s say 17 years to withdraw a

00:18:30

court order for 18 And even here,

00:18:34

when I understood,

00:18:37

write

00:18:40

what it is called

00:18:43

I need time when she understood And when

00:18:47

in relation Mom also attached

00:18:50

documents confirming that we do

00:18:51

not have any debt;

00:18:54

she herself accepts the claim and makes a determination,

00:18:57

that is, there are no grounds for

00:19:00

refusal or leaving it without movement.

00:19:01

Then she herself says she makes a

00:19:05

determination where she

00:19:07

contradicts herself and says that we are leaving

00:19:13

them without consideration dragging out legal proceedings

00:19:15

we are

00:19:17

wasting years of our lives 19 years

00:19:20

19 I am two years old mother of three years None of the

00:19:23

law enforcement agencies are talking about the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the

00:19:26

Gulkevichi district of Malyukov,

00:19:29

but I also applied about my own case and called to

00:19:33

take some action

00:19:36

because I can’t think to make

00:19:39

music, the

00:19:45

bailiff service came to

00:19:48

attack me there, the snot of the capital with

00:19:51

a gun was also the presence of

00:19:54

employees where I tried to prove that the

00:19:56

court order was canceled,

00:19:58

all my accounts were arrested, all

00:20:00

my activities were realized, that is, any penny,

00:20:03

everything I had, everything was for everything.

00:20:04

imposed sharply and for two months two months I

00:20:08

had to prove to everyone that

00:20:10

after only two months this money was

00:20:11

returned to me no one at all Right now Even I

00:20:15

see the blatant disrespect of no one

00:20:17

investigator no one my official

00:20:20

time I have to spend a year of my

00:20:22

life my time to pay taxes so that

00:20:25

you understand these loafers.

00:20:29

That is, I wanted to say that what Martynov

00:20:32

wanted was this, that is, he himself comes to the

00:20:35

bailiffs and indicates that the court order

00:20:38

has been canceled And on the basis of which they

00:20:41

carry out enforcement actions However, the

00:20:43

bailiffs continued to carry out

00:20:45

enforcement actions, continued to

00:20:47

arrest

00:20:48

yet

00:20:50

why

00:20:51

not not Dear court We filed reports of a

00:20:54

crime against the

00:20:56

bailiff who exceeded his

00:20:58

powers and carried out enforcement

00:21:00

actions after being notified of the cancellation of the

00:21:03

judicial parish and he stole

00:21:06

funds of 80 72 thousand from Martynov, we

00:21:10

also filed a statement against the bailiff with the

00:21:12

investigators, but in relation to

00:21:14

all three,

00:21:17

that’s all

00:21:25

today orders No, after my

00:21:35

collection, it abstained because it

00:21:38

returned the money, they realized that

00:21:42

their car would no longer pass, that is, they

00:21:45

would not fit.

00:21:52

But the Power Rostelecom company,

00:21:57

the court order canceled

00:22:00

the decision, which means

00:22:06

about the Rus collection after a

00:22:09

fabricated court order. It was

00:22:11

canceled and there were no further

00:22:14

civil cases. That is, this is the

00:22:16

final final document, but in it

00:22:19

we already see elements of a crime.

00:22:21

As for Rostelecom, they are in

00:22:24

accordance with the boys of the plenums about

00:22:26

fraud. Yes, misappropriation of embezzlement,

00:22:28

they received a judicial act giving the right,

00:22:31

namely a court order, illegal,

00:22:33

received a court decision an absentee

00:22:36

decision, that is, this is also already over,

00:22:38

this is what we canceled And later,

00:22:41

when, as part of the trial, it

00:22:43

was established that

00:22:46

the debt was falsified, these monthly payments, and so

00:22:48

on, and information about Rostelecom

00:22:52

was falsified about

00:22:55

Martynova’s alleged payment, it

00:22:57

was falsified for a long time, she had a personal account

00:22:59

about which we even we don’t know because

00:23:02

in each piece of paper they have different

00:23:04

personal account numbers it says we didn’t pay it

00:23:07

and at the court hearing

00:23:10

Gorshkov’s representative refused the claim

00:23:14

fabricated information that allegedly Martynov

00:23:16

However, the court issued a ruling recognizing the

00:23:19

refusal of the claim but in it indicated that they did not

00:23:23

provide evidence that it was paid for by

00:23:26

Markin because they made a

00:23:28

printout from their program of some kind of

00:23:30

personal account,

00:23:33

they fabricated a refusal from the search, but it clearly indicated

00:23:37

that what Martynov supposedly had not

00:23:40

been proven, and so on, and Martynova

00:23:43

could not pay, we

00:23:45

have been suing since the nineteenth year. Yes, there is this is the definition

00:23:48

for review, this is the final document

00:23:52

dated July 6 for review of the court,

00:23:57

this is from July 6,

00:24:01

and yes, we ask that we have

00:24:05

this copy, yes,

00:24:08

yes, no, there is

00:24:11

[music]

00:24:23

254 of 6,

00:24:26

the definition of the production

00:24:33

of non-debt when baptized before

00:24:36

refuse

00:24:38

[music]

00:24:41

stopped Adding the ruling

00:24:44

and wanted to add that before

00:24:47

this procedural decision was made,

00:24:49

which was the final case, Judge

00:24:51

Balashov granted our petition

00:24:53

faster, it was not from the original Isa such an

00:24:56

agreement on the basis of which the alleged

00:24:58

debt and also to give an explanation of the

00:25:01

origin of the amount in the calculation since

00:25:04

we They stated that they were falsified,

00:25:06

different, and so on. And why are there different

00:25:09

personal accounts, photocopies in one so in

00:25:12

the calculation in a different way in payment, the third, that

00:25:15

is, they beat everything and the Judge asked for it all.

00:25:18

However, they did not provide anything, but they

00:25:21

sent that we ask to stop the

00:25:22

proceedings, the

00:25:24

investigation itself is not

00:25:29

we are talking exactly about the objective side,

00:25:32

we are describing what we see it in, so that the

00:25:34

investigator makes a procedural

00:25:36

decision in those actions that can be

00:25:38

seen

00:26:11

were requested by the traveler in the

00:26:16

candy department, respectively, the department of

00:26:18

verification according to reports of crime, the court

00:26:22

they did not receive

00:26:24

any

00:26:26

petitions for this, I really want to

00:26:29

say

00:26:30

in view of this what needs to be said the

00:26:33

inspection material is still cosmetics

00:26:34

was registered the red line of

00:26:38

this application data or there is no

00:26:42

inspection guide and also

00:26:44

to understand

00:26:46

what is the procedure for registering a

00:26:49

report on crimes

00:26:52

grounds for

00:26:57

registration accordingly Making a decision to

00:27:00

conduct an inspection in the order

00:27:08

with which I

00:27:11

requested the materials on the application

00:27:14

and the instructions defining the procedure for

00:27:17

clarifying messages in the city

00:27:21

means no less, dear court.

00:27:24

I want to draw the attention of the prosecutor and those

00:27:29

involved in the case that we

00:27:31

are still in court, the

00:27:32

subject of the complaint is being considered in

00:27:35

accordance with Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and

00:27:39

the Code of Criminal Procedure clearly

00:27:41

indicates the procedure for considering this

00:27:43

complaint Yes indeed, it should be

00:27:44

examined in detail, we requested the

00:27:47

inspection materials, the court requested the

00:27:50

inspection materials, however, the Investigative

00:27:52

Committee did not provide them, did not

00:27:57

send a representative, evades, that is, expresses

00:28:01

contempt of the court for the participants in the process,

00:28:05

the head of the Investigative Committee, the

00:28:07

loudmouths,

00:28:09

obstructed the administration of

00:28:11

justice, that is, consideration of the complaint within the

00:28:14

time limits established by law. for this

00:28:17

reason, that the material was not presented, it is

00:28:21

impossible to consider the complaint, that is, it is

00:28:24

registered what was done there, and so

00:28:27

on. Accordingly, I believe that it is

00:28:31

really necessary to satisfy the

00:28:34

prosecutor’s request to postpone the court

00:28:37

hearing, which is the subject, however, I ask the court to

00:28:40

take measures against the head of the

00:28:44

committee for sabotage for

00:28:47

non-compliance the court's instructions for disrupting the

00:28:52

consideration of the complaint are established by law,

00:28:55

and I also want to add that the

00:28:59

loudmouths did these actions intentionally during

00:29:02

this time, I assume

00:29:06

at least something will be done retroactively,

00:29:10

falsified surveys, documents,

00:29:13

anything else for this purpose, they

00:29:18

avoided providing materials

00:29:20

checked That is, they simply have nothing,

00:29:22

so they expect that the court will postpone

00:29:25

for a week and during this week they will

00:29:27

do something and ask for something and our prosecutor

00:29:32

will stand up and be in all white and there will be a

00:29:34

petition to terminate the proceedings,

00:29:36

perhaps since they themselves have already taken

00:29:39

such measures That is why I ask the

00:29:43

petition to grant the case,

00:29:46

to postpone the hearings and also to take measures

00:29:51

against the head of the Investigative

00:29:52

Committee shouted that he respect the court,

00:29:57

respect the participants in the process and respect

00:29:59

the law where there is a shortened time frame for

00:30:02

consideration, especially

00:30:08

nothing is required to provide the court with verification materials on a report of a crime.

00:30:13

there is a prosecutor on the second floor

00:30:16

there is an investigative committee on the first

00:30:19

and 600 meters away the inspection materials

00:30:24

can be

00:30:25

presented to the court in any way, that is, you do

00:30:29

n’t need to make anything, just

00:30:31

take what you have and bring it to the court, that is, there are

00:30:33

no problems, that’s why

00:30:37

I ask for your

00:30:41

support the

00:30:53

head of the

00:30:55

committee or subordinates

00:30:58

do not consider their official time necessary at all,

00:31:03

and we are forced to once again

00:31:05

postpone the case so that the prosecutor

00:31:07

and,

00:31:09

accordingly, the committee,

00:31:15

because there is

00:31:20

and According to Article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

00:31:23

laws are adopted, a reasoned decision,

00:31:26

we are forced to go and the deadline is already We the court

00:31:30

Resolve in conclusion prosecutor

00:31:34

Now wait wait Now I

00:31:37

will express this idea more clearly

00:31:39

means dear court the participants in the process

00:31:41

the prosecutor in accordance with Article 125 of the

00:31:44

Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

00:31:46

gives his conclusion whether he considers the complaint to be

00:31:49

satisfied or not to be

00:31:51

satisfied in this case the

00:31:53

representatives of the

00:31:55

prosecutor's office of the political district of

00:31:57

Vorobyov participating in the case she came to the court without

00:32:02

any conclusion,

00:32:04

no inspection materials, she also did not

00:32:08

study what was required and also came

00:32:11

absolutely unprepared to participate in the

00:32:14

trial. So, accordingly, the

00:32:24

head of the Investigative

00:32:26

Committee acts in a group and these actions to sabotage and disrupt the trial Krikunov and personally the prosecutor of the

00:32:29

Gulkevichi district Rakhvalov They are

00:32:31

agreed upon, that is, it expresses disrespect for the

00:32:34

participant in the process And what is most dangerous

00:32:37

to the law is what they do, there is no

00:32:41

conclusion, the prosecutor, before filing complaints with the

00:32:43

court, read it, prepare not within the

00:32:46

framework of the court, you prepared And in advance,

00:32:49

that’s why everything is

00:33:07

Russian Federation

00:33:09

materials here

00:33:13

checks on Martin's application report of a

00:33:16

crime on June 23, 2022

00:33:20

in connection with this the court hearing is

00:33:22

postponed singular Now I won’t

00:33:25

say I’ll log it please

Description:

Руководитель Гулькевичского отдела СК СУ по КК Крикунов отказался регистрировать сообщение о преступлении в отношении мировой судьи Фонтанецкой, ПАО Ростелеком, ООО ИНкассарус. Прокурор Гулькевичского района Рахвалов самоустранился мер прокурорского реагирования не принимает, надзор за следственным комитетом не осуществляет. А что мы делаем в таких случаях? Действуем в соответствии со ст. 125 УПК РФ, подаем жалобу в суд более известную как волшебный "пендаль" для должностных лиц в погонах, отказывающихся работать по закону. Какое решение примет суд? Пишите в комментариях свое мнение. Подписывайтесь на канал, делитесь в соц. сетях, смотрите продолжение, будет интересно. ★Вы всегда можете поддержать наш канал: Карта сбербанка 2202 2050 7492 5691 Яндекс-деньги 410014623235167 Донат https://www.donationalerts.com/r/ooy Мой авторский канал :My author's channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClL5WnWYbM8oWt7GK4Tx8nQ Я в Одноклассники: Сергей Земцов ОСОБО ОПАСНЫЙ ЮРИСТ https://ok.ru/profile/571292721988 Я в Контакте: Сергей Земцов https://vk.com/id352955314 Защита от жуликов и воров: Предупреждаем о том, что содержимое данного видео является субъективным мнением авторов, а так же сообщений и комментариев и в некоторых случаях может содержать ложную информацию, когда автор не разобрался полностью в ситуации . К сведению подписчиков и зрителей- администрация канала (сайта,страницы) не может проверить достоверность всей размещаемой информации, что необходимо учитывать при ознакомлении и размещении своих комментариев.

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Руководитель СК Крикунов не хочет работать! Может волшебный "пендаль" поможет?"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.