background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Арестович: Единство в Украине потеряно? @baitassov_live"

input logo icon
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Обстановка на фронте: Купянск, Бахмут, Работино, Авдеевка. В украинской армии катастрофическая нехватка снарядов. Война дронов.
4:54
Оборона Авдеевки — отвод украинских войск начался. Российская армия движется на Покровск.
7:58
Общий замысел врага — захватить Донецкую, Луганскую, Запорожскую и Херсонскую области.
10:15
Конфликт между Залужным и Зеленским. Мобилизация в Украине: цена, стоимость. Политическая стратегия Украины не соответствует реальной обстановке.
17:48
Главком ВСУ Сырский и его стиль командования. Удачные военные операции и потери. Политический рейтинг.
22:14
Потеря единства украинского общества.
24:53
Стратегия Зеленского не совпадает со стратегией Запада, делает невозможным диалог и приводит к снижению военной помощи.
26:05
Военная помощь от США. Перспективы обрушения фронта. Информационная политика украинской власти.
29:03
Легитимность Верховной рады и президента Украины — дополнительные дестабилизирующие факторы после 31 марта.
31:34
Необходимость выборов в Украине. Кандидатура Залужного в качестве президента страны.
33:17
Зачем нужна власть Зеленскому? Стратегия войны.
36:44
Предположил сценарий развития событий, когда украинцы готовы к мирным переговорам в условиях мобилизации.
40:05
Положение дел в России на фоне войны. Два возможных сценария Путина.
44:20
Президент Украины может пойти на мирные переговоры по Формуле мира, цель которых — создание новой системы безопасности в Европе и мире.
48:42
Россия хочет переговоров, но ее никто не приглашает.
49:20
Обеспечение воюющих сторон во время войны. Стратегия войны Путина — в мировом противодействии Западу.
51:40
Проблема Украины — мы заявили и реализовывали цели, на которые не имеем ресурса. Высокая цена инфантильной политики Украины.
55:13
Лицемерная и инфантильная политика Запада после 1991 года: во время мирных переговоров военная помощь Украине не предоставлялась. При каких условиях может быть гарантирован мир.
57:45
Неприятная перспектива Запада: считаю неизбежным столкновение России и Европы. Неготовность нового типа людей в Европе воевать.
1:01:24
Отсутствие ответственных политиков: о коллективной системе безопасности говорят только Арестович и Путин.
1:02:25
Реакция украинцев на нереальность достижения границ 1991 года в текущем положении.
1:04:17
Реальность нахождения в оккупации части территорий Украины в течение многих лет. За что воюет Украина. Угроза суверенитету страны с Востока и Запада.
1:05:30
Возможные цели политики Украины: действия, которые необходимы для повышения реального суверенитета.
1:07:19
Пессимизм в перспективах Украины — главный урок страна пока не выучила. Высокая цена, чтобы стать самостоятельной, взрослой, и сохраниться в истории.
1:09:56
Президентские амбиции Арестовича и неполитические пути помощи стране.
Video tags
|

Video tags

арестович
арестович алексей
алексей арестович
арестович последнее
alexey arestovych
fhtcnjdbx
alexey arestovich
arestovich
аристович
arestovych
украина
украина новости
война
россия
арестович интервью
новости
олексій арестович
арестович олексій
интервью
политика
алексей арестович последнее
путин
арестович сегодня
новости сегодня
алексей арестович интервью
арестович война
залужный
война в украине
сырский
интервью путина
день 724
авдеевка
арестович президент
всу
алексейарестович
зеленский
україна
олексійарестович
войнавукраине2024
войнаукраина
нато
запад
европа
фронт
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:00
Hello everyone, the next episode of the
00:00:01
Life bytas program is on air. Today my
00:00:03
guest is one of the best military experts I
00:00:05
know, Alexey Aristovich Alexey.
00:00:08
Good afternoon, good to see good de Yes,
00:00:12
good view outside the window, good mood, I
00:00:16
see, I’m glad to see. Haven’t talked for a long time;
00:00:19
questions, to be honest, a lot Alexey,
00:00:22
a lot of things changed in our last
00:00:24
meeting that we had last
00:00:26
year, we then talked about a counter-
00:00:30
offensive, we even assumed that even you
00:00:32
said that a counter-offensive does not
00:00:33
mean in a modern war, it does not mean that
00:00:35
it has been announced, it is starting, it is already
00:00:38
underway in fact
00:00:40
But there is a lot of water a lot of
00:00:43
things
00:00:44
have changed since then, but at the beginning of the program
00:00:47
I would, of course, like to first clarify
00:00:50
the situation in general that has developed at
00:00:53
the
00:00:55
moment, today information is being received to the VCU, it seems that they are
00:01:00
handing over or there are quite
00:01:03
intense military operations going on there, I would like to
00:01:05
just at the beginning of the program a
00:01:07
little bit about operational situation, what is
00:01:09
happening now on the front line on the
00:01:11
line of contact between the troops, now the
00:01:14
pendulum has swung in the other direction for a long
00:01:16
time, we were advancing, we talked last time
00:01:18
when the counter-offensive was
00:01:20
just beginning on June 4, it began
00:01:23
formally, but it was not announced, and
00:01:26
today, more than six months later, the phase is
00:01:29
already fa the offensive
00:01:30
belongs to the Russian Federation, that
00:01:33
is, we have exhausted our capabilities
00:01:34
to advance; we have stopped. As often happens in
00:01:35
military affairs,
00:01:38
they went on the defensive from October 4, approximately they
00:01:40
began to attack in different sectors, the front is
00:01:42
1300 km internal; the
00:01:45
hottest sections are the
00:01:48
Kupinsky Vka, of course, south of
00:01:51
Novomikhailovka And here is rabotino this is already
00:01:53
where we were advancing, the Russians are counter-
00:01:55
attacking, according to some data, they have already
00:01:57
taken work that requires clarification
00:01:59
and have prepared a serious group
00:02:02
that should go further to advance,
00:02:04
such groups are everywhere,
00:02:08
including Avdiivka, including
00:02:12
Kupinsky, hundreds of armored vehicles,
00:02:14
artillery tanks, and so on, they
00:02:17
prepared well and used the time
00:02:18
which was almost 9 months before the counter-offensive
00:02:20
and the time for the counter-offensive
00:02:23
in order to form reserves
00:02:25
that were now thrown into battle and due to
00:02:27
numerical superiority. And often Cast
00:02:30
superiority because
00:02:31
their quantity is also quality and
00:02:35
when Well, you have one shell there against
00:02:38
20 shells against one of your
00:02:41
opponents understands that the quality of everything that is
00:02:43
happening is changing. Ukrainians,
00:02:46
accordingly, we are in a phase where we have
00:02:48
been sitting for several months without Western
00:02:50
assistance, in particular without American assistance, we have a
00:02:52
catastrophic shortage of shells and
00:02:55
some
00:02:57
other mediums, which certainly affects the
00:03:00
conduct of hostilities. We have returned
00:03:02
to the phase in which we were in April, May,
00:03:04
June and even July of the 2nd year
00:03:09
when we spent almost all the weapons and
00:03:12
ammunition to stop the
00:03:13
Russian army from being defeated in the first month.
00:03:15
And then when it gathered its forces, found
00:03:17
reserves and went on the offensive, since the
00:03:21
beginning of April we were practically without missiles
00:03:23
from the
00:03:25
troops and there were episodes when,
00:03:27
during the battle for the village, for example,
00:03:29
along the whole front, along the
00:03:32
front as a whole, they fired 60,000 shells per day,
00:03:35
we responded with three, at best,
00:03:37
using some kind of NZ There and so on,
00:03:40
now the situation is approximately
00:03:42
60,000 They, of course they don’t release, but
00:03:44
they release 20 completely. And we
00:03:47
release. Well, maybe there are very
00:03:51
few, I won’t name the numbers because well,
00:03:53
many times more than should be called. Yes, no
00:03:56
need, we have a catastrophic situation, we
00:03:58
don’t have enough shells and, as always, we pay
00:04:01
for all the infantry with our own blood,
00:04:02
directly stopping enemy
00:04:05
The only thing that has changed and from our
00:04:07
Russian side there are a lot of
00:04:09
Drones, including fpv Drones of the so-
00:04:11
called this is almost 90% of the battle of
00:04:15
collisions if it is not a city or nearby
00:04:17
in the field this is a war Drones equipment does not
00:04:20
have time to reach the front line people
00:04:22
do not have time to reach or if they have time, then it’s
00:04:23
all the same and precedes the drones; they
00:04:25
accompany the drones and fight off the drones;
00:04:28
some clashes look like this; drones from the
00:04:30
Russian side are on our
00:04:32
stronghold; drones from our side
00:04:34
may not reach the shooting battle; they’re all howling with drones; and so the
00:04:37
drones are what allows us to restrain
00:04:38
the Russians. Because if there was a situation
00:04:42
without Drones now with so many
00:04:44
shells and everything else that
00:04:46
we have, or rather which we don’t have. It must be
00:04:49
said correctly, the situation would be
00:04:51
much worse now Avdeevka
00:04:53
Avdeevka
00:04:55
was started to be stormed somewhere almost a
00:04:59
month ago before the Russians
00:05:01
troops have been accumulating for a long time, this is a
00:05:03
fairly fortified point, since the
00:05:05
fourteenth year it has represented the most
00:05:06
likely fortified point on our entire
00:05:09
front, a serious defense center is a
00:05:11
system of defense nodes, and here they are
00:05:13
now, that is, they are fighting with
00:05:18
ammunition and food stored or captured from the enemy. There and so
00:05:20
on and so forth then one of
00:05:22
our best assault brigs, the third
00:05:25
assault brig, was introduced there - these are former Azov
00:05:27
mobilized ones, which Azov selected
00:05:29
themselves, trained and so on, its commander
00:05:31
Colonel Andrei Beletsky,
00:05:33
they are guys who know how to fight, let’s
00:05:36
say so But even for them it’s hard to contain
00:05:40
the situation because well, there are
00:05:41
about seven Russians against them brigades there are
00:05:44
much smaller than ours Well,
00:05:47
the numbers there are higher yes Well of
00:05:49
course numerical superiority has been created In addition,
00:05:51
the Russians are very actively
00:05:52
using guided bombs And in general the
00:05:54
Avdievka bombs are closer to Donetsk, they did not
00:05:57
cross the
00:05:58
front line, the plane from Donetsk is
00:06:00
dropping bombs and I I’ve just been to Avdeevka many times
00:06:03
so that you understand that this is a very
00:06:05
small tiny city, strong, and
00:06:08
now so many of these Bombs and artillery
00:06:09
are flying into it, into the plant, into the entire defense center, that well,
00:06:16
you can be three times a
00:06:19
professional, but it doesn’t matter whether it’s a bomb or a
00:06:22
shell how much with how much are you
00:06:29
all Therefore, there is a difficult situation there in the
00:06:33
morning information there the situation
00:06:35
changes quickly by the hour in the morning there is
00:06:37
information when you and I write down
00:06:38
that we left the Zenit position which
00:06:40
was to the south If you saw a diagram like this
00:06:41
it was almost engulfed by the enemy
00:06:44
second Yes, a distant position we are starting to
00:06:46
retreat from some positions that
00:06:52
were as far as possible from the exit from the corridor and now the task is to hold the knots,
00:06:56
or rather to hold the exit point so that the
00:06:58
troops can
00:07:00
We are fighting to hold or even
00:07:03
expand the corridor, mainly to
00:07:04
hold so that the troops can
00:07:06
leave unhindered, whether a decision has been made is
00:07:07
unknown but the withdrawal has begun. By the
00:07:09
time we speak, everything may already be
00:07:12
over because there is a very
00:07:14
small area, a city much smaller than
00:07:15
Bakhmut, for example, and incomparable,
00:07:20
and Well, everything can already happen by the time the recording comes out, it will be
00:07:28
edited, the
00:07:30
audience will watch from the future,
00:07:32
ours, they will already know how it
00:07:34
ended It’s clear And in the other
00:07:37
direction, what’s
00:07:39
happening is that they’re pressing very hard near
00:07:41
Novo Mikhailovka, it’s not
00:07:45
that far south of Avdeevka in order to cut off the
00:07:47
so-called Ugledarsky ledge and
00:07:50
move forward, that is, the general
00:07:51
plan is that they’re moving in the direction of
00:07:54
Pokrovsk. This corresponds to the political
00:07:57
tasks set by the Russian Federation.
00:07:59
which says that their task is to liberate liberate
00:08:02
in quotes to seize for us the
00:08:05
Donetsk and Lugansk regions completely
00:08:08
completely within the administrative borders along the
00:08:11
administrative borders the same
00:08:13
Zaporozhye but also Kherson Kherson
00:08:14
is difficult because the Kherson part is on the
00:08:16
right bank high they cannot take
00:08:18
krynki a village that will hold a
00:08:19
small number of ours sang, but due to the fact
00:08:21
that we are on the low
00:08:24
coast of Russia, the Russians are storming
00:08:26
our artillery and drones on the high Yeah,
00:08:29
we see and very well help our
00:08:32
fighters who are there directly on the
00:08:34
bridgehead and unsuccessful assaults have been going on
00:08:36
for several months in a row with very
00:08:38
large losses for Russia in general, they
00:08:40
don’t take losses into account, they are now pushing
00:08:42
forward just in a very characteristic
00:08:45
manner, the same thing under Kupinsky there is a
00:08:47
very serious group, according to the data
00:08:49
which was called there, several hundred
00:08:51
tanks, armored vehicles, several hundred up to 40
00:08:54
personnel. They are actively pressing, they
00:08:56
want to capture Pinsk, this is large There is a
00:08:58
railway
00:09:01
junction
00:09:03
and it is
00:09:05
also actually a transition to the other side of the
00:09:09
river, Old Askol,
00:09:11
for our creation of conditions to
00:09:13
develop the offensive there already in place on the
00:09:16
right bank,
00:09:19
so for them it is very profitable, they
00:09:21
do everything to get in by attacking the two
00:09:28
main ones, or rather Bakhmut, north- east of
00:09:30
Bakhmut And there from Lisichansk from
00:09:32
Severodonetsk I want to cut off this ledge
00:09:35
So that is, four somewhere main
00:09:38
points of application of efforts,
00:09:40
serious groups have been created everywhere that
00:09:42
represent, well, several
00:09:45
Russian armies in total Clearly, two
00:09:49
armies somewhere, two somewhere in the direction
00:09:51
plus -minus, this is all very conditional. Well,
00:09:52
in this very general overview, somewhere
00:09:54
like this it turns out that these are serious forces and it is
00:09:56
difficult to resist them, especially without
00:09:58
American help, the key to the situation
00:10:00
is the lack of American help, the
00:10:02
lack of the required amount of
00:10:03
ammunition, missiles and others, and so far there
00:10:06
they are going into battle, we are losing sections of the front
00:10:09
and are standing in very difficult conditions.
00:10:11
Our troops are in very difficult conditions and this
00:10:14
just begs the question. Last
00:10:18
week when I
00:10:20
arrived. Well, in principle, I was already expecting the
00:10:22
expected message that Valery
00:10:25
Zaluzhny is leaving the post of commander and will take
00:10:28
his place Alexander Syrsky arrives
00:10:32
and at the same time this happens at the moment
00:10:35
when the Russian troops are essentially advancing.
00:10:37
At such a moment a
00:10:40
change occurs, although I’m
00:10:42
already saying it now, they call it
00:10:45
expected, how logical was this
00:10:48
change and how much of the same is there?
00:10:51
still an old saying at the
00:10:53
crossing they don’t change horses at all
00:10:55
it’s like changing command in a dangerous time
00:10:58
how justified it is And
00:11:01
in general What is the strategy of the Ukrainian
00:11:04
troops at the moment what is being done
00:11:08
What is the idea What to do next look at the
00:11:12
ideological or strategic
00:11:13
conflict between the commander-in-chief and the
00:11:16
supreme commander We have had it for a long time,
00:11:17
it was materially identified at
00:11:19
the material level, visibly conclusively on
00:11:22
November 1, 2003, when Zaluzhny
00:11:24
published his famous article in the economist
00:11:26
and said that the
00:11:27
offensive was over, our counteroffensive
00:11:30
was unsuccessful due to the
00:11:32
technical impasse and the parity of the parties that
00:11:34
arose on the front line. Following the example of the
00:11:36
First Worldwide when everyone
00:11:38
fights courageously but no one can advance
00:11:40
because there are no means of advancement
00:11:41
that allow them to overcome the deep
00:11:43
defense created by the enemy, yeah,
00:11:46
Zelensky categorically disagreed with this,
00:11:47
they got into such public
00:11:49
debates, even polemicize in absentia [
00:11:52
music]
00:11:55
the opportunity to talk directly all this
00:11:57
lasted for some time where -at the
00:11:59
beginning of December, that is, a month It took the
00:12:01
Supreme Commander-in-Chief the President
00:12:03
to say Well, okay, we are
00:12:05
on the defensive Yes, this really
00:12:07
means that and for a month we lived in a situation
00:12:10
where we did not agree on the positions of the one
00:12:12
who commands the army and the one who
00:12:14
commands the one who commands the army this is
00:12:16
not normal and cannot continue for a long time in an
00:12:17
obviously obvious way. It
00:12:20
seems to me that there was still a fundamental
00:12:24
discrepancy in the further strategy of
00:12:25
waging war, confirmation of this is that
00:12:28
one Flock is laid down, which he
00:12:30
published before leaving and where he directly
00:12:33
said that the army will do its job
00:12:35
only if the state provides it in
00:12:37
terms of material and in terms of
00:12:39
people, the key for us was that
00:12:41
this conflict resulted
00:12:44
in the need to mobilize
00:12:46
500,000 people, half a million of
00:12:48
which was announced. And even
00:12:50
about it, the discussion was very difficult
00:12:53
because Zaluzhny was released for a
00:12:56
press conference and ordered to go at the
00:12:58
last moment then he carried it out
00:13:01
very honorably, then Zelensky,
00:13:04
who first pushed him out, then
00:13:06
began to take over the communication himself, for
00:13:08
which, by the way, honor and praise to him because
00:13:10
the president should not run away from
00:13:11
responsibility. But the point is,
00:13:15
this is what the possibilities for
00:13:16
mobilization are that we desperately need
00:13:18
limited primarily financially
00:13:20
yesterday, the Hetmans, the Chairman of the
00:13:22
Verkhovna Rada Committee on Taxes and Duties, he
00:13:24
said that tax policy, he said
00:13:27
that 720
00:13:29
for the mobilization of 5 people who have
00:13:32
absolutely nowhere to take, given the still
00:13:34
lack of American assistance, that’s
00:13:37
the state of our military economy and
00:13:39
announced not even popular solution
00:13:41
But the question in the World Cup Zelensky named a figure
00:13:42
at a press conference: one mobilized
00:13:44
soldier is a million Green to
00:13:46
put him in line, put on shoes, and so
00:13:47
on, so
00:13:49
Ukraine is now undergoing a very
00:13:52
serious exam, an exam that will
00:13:55
cost
00:13:57
perhaps part of the territory, an exam for
00:14:00
statehood, a solvency test,
00:14:01
which is that it is necessary to
00:14:02
mobilize several hundred
00:14:04
thousand people somewhere, take them and mobilize them, but for
00:14:06
this there is neither finance nor organizational
00:14:08
capacity, there is no possibility even of
00:14:10
high-quality training in training
00:14:11
centers because their capacity is
00:14:12
significantly less than even 50,000 at a
00:14:15
time, and besides, they are under fire
00:14:17
are located, that is, the accumulation of troops and
00:14:19
training. This is a constant threat of Russian
00:14:21
strikes, this is a very difficult situation. For
00:14:24
comparison, I can say that all the training
00:14:26
centers of the UGM of Russia
00:14:29
and all of Russia, yes. Or 300, this must be
00:14:34
taught somewhere else. That is, it is too long to
00:14:37
fight. This is very long story and
00:14:41
Apparently they did not agree with the president. They did
00:14:45
not agree on numbers or on the understanding of
00:14:47
where and how to use these troops. The
00:14:49
official political slogan of the
00:14:50
president remains the border de year everything is
00:14:54
red Toms he understands that they are
00:14:57
not in principle because for this you need to come
00:15:00
from then take 1,700 troops that
00:15:03
will be armed with
00:15:04
first-class will not end in the
00:15:06
next 2 years first-class is like the
00:15:08
American Army Then we can
00:15:10
talk about the borders of the first of the year which,
00:15:12
in principle, is not expected, and this
00:15:14
same slogan is not removed, it
00:15:16
gives rise to such
00:15:18
a little schizophrenic state in society When everyone
00:15:21
has relatives in
00:15:22
the army, everyone without exception, everyone has
00:15:26
dead wounded friends, they
00:15:27
understand perfectly well that the princes of the year are out of the
00:15:29
question, but it is officially
00:15:31
declared that we Wow, Victory is the way out,
00:15:33
so the Tsar gave an interview as but
00:15:35
appointed and said that the war must
00:15:36
end within the borders of the ninety-first
00:15:38
year, then it will end, this is a very
00:15:40
strange thesis because no one
00:15:42
guarantees that it will end even
00:15:43
after reaching the borders of Dejanovo,
00:15:46
the war has a sum of contradictions
00:15:47
that does not concern the borders, but is
00:15:50
much larger and wider
00:15:53
and has been shot down. our optics and rhetoric are confused,
00:15:56
that is, people understand perfectly well
00:15:59
that what the military and the
00:16:02
highest civilian authorities are saying now does not
00:16:03
correspond to the real situation,
00:16:05
their mood is not added to the desire for
00:16:07
mobile phones.
00:16:11
in this
00:16:13
sense, Yes, and as you understand, the lack of
00:16:15
help does not add it, in general, we are
00:16:17
going through, as the Western press writes,
00:16:19
through a severe internal
00:16:20
political crisis, and so on. I think that
00:16:22
Zaluzhny. I don’t know this, but I think this is
00:16:24
my guess that Zaluzhny
00:16:26
fundamentally disagreed on
00:16:27
several points.
00:16:29
Well, here you can understand Zelensky,
00:16:31
well, how to work with a person who
00:16:34
doesn’t listen to you, as it were, and
00:16:37
whose friend has a different strategy and
00:16:39
who would like to pursue a fundamentally different
00:16:42
war policy, as it were, and logic,
00:16:45
but he fires him and appoints a person
00:16:46
who will to carry out his orders,
00:16:48
at the same time, a whole clan of generals is changing,
00:16:49
that is, Zaluzhny’s team is being
00:16:51
removed from the armed forces. Yes, they are
00:16:53
now all undergoing a military medical
00:16:55
commission, they will most likely be fired and
00:16:57
rise from X young general
00:17:00
colonels with very positive reviews
00:17:02
in the troops because they rose
00:17:05
on the wave 14 years, for example, the same
00:17:07
Sukharevsky, who was the first battalion
00:17:25
commander to open up for his comrades. Since then, he commanded very well, then he fought very well, then he was
00:17:28
appointed deputy
00:17:29
commander-in-chief who should
00:17:31
develop the direction of unmanned
00:17:32
aerial vehicles; we have created them
00:17:34
as a separate branch of the military. So some of
00:17:38
them, for example, are
00:17:42
shrouded in different the kind of rumors that
00:17:46
need to be verified, for example,
00:17:48
Syrsky himself throws everything at him, and the
00:17:50
Butcher
00:17:52
and relatives in Russia, mom, brother, dad,
00:17:55
brother in Vladimir, and so on, graduated from
00:17:57
Moscow about the military, and so on,
00:17:59
the truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle Uh-huh,
00:18:02
Syrsky, of course, not a meznik, but he a typical
00:18:04
representative is the commander of the old Soviet
00:18:05
school and questions arise whether the
00:18:09
Soviet school is suitable for Ukraine, its approaches are
00:18:11
not a step back, and so on, this is what we
00:18:12
now see in Avdievka, this is when
00:18:14
elite units are thrown into a city
00:18:17
that is in a hopeless
00:18:19
situation in a city that is
00:18:22
still facing surrender and hold on until
00:18:24
the last Well, the last last, this
00:18:27
raises questions
00:18:29
because many have already considered
00:18:31
there a repetition of Mariupol in Mariupol
00:18:33
Azov which Denis Prokopenko commander of the
00:18:36
radish Yes they actually put Yes here
00:18:39
many bloggers began to wonder if you do
00:18:40
n’t want Maybe you want to
00:18:42
put a third assault There just like that
00:18:44
That is, our
00:18:47
political and moral situation is extremely tense and
00:18:49
the worst assumptions are immediately put forward.
00:18:51
I don’t think that anyone
00:18:53
specifically wants to put them there, but
00:18:55
the use of an elite attack
00:18:56
unit in a situation where it
00:18:58
can do little due to the total
00:18:59
superiority of opponents of aviation in the
00:19:01
artillery, the establishment of them is actually a
00:19:02
trap for me, a very dubious
00:19:04
question that needs explanation, so
00:19:07
we immediately see the command style of the new commander-in-
00:19:08
chief Uh-huh, and before that we must say
00:19:11
that Syrsky is the commander-in-chief who,
00:19:13
or rather the general who really
00:19:16
carried out the Kiev operation
00:19:18
successfully, really carried out the Kharkov operation
00:19:20
the offensive is very successful, but he
00:19:23
also loses the sixth city in a row in the east
00:19:25
according to the same scheme because he is
00:19:27
a land howl,
00:19:29
yes he is near the joint venture troops he commanded
00:19:31
in the east. Yes, in the east it was
00:19:33
Syrsky who lost the popasny
00:19:35
solidar Lisichansk bakhmut and Severodonetsk
00:19:39
and now he
00:19:41
is losing Therefore, for two successful
00:19:44
operations he has six major losses and this
00:19:47
ratio and action is what in
00:19:49
Avdievka began to make
00:19:51
society and the army think very much about the
00:19:54
style of work of the new
00:19:56
commander, the future will of course show,
00:19:58
but now people are very cautious
00:20:01
and it is Avdievka became such a stone, on
00:20:05
the other hand, it must be said that he
00:20:06
understood perfectly well when he took on the
00:20:08
responsibilities of the commander-in-chief that he
00:20:09
would soon lose
00:20:10
Avdeevka. That is, he understood what he was
00:20:13
going to and that the responsibility would fall on
00:20:15
him and everyone, of course, would compare him to
00:20:16
Zaluzhny and so on so what what what And
00:20:19
this man
00:20:20
has the decisiveness of the king I know him Personally,
00:20:24
he has a great advantage for
00:20:26
politicians is that he
00:20:28
will not argue, he will carry out the
00:20:30
strategy that will be said, he has
00:20:33
long determined for himself that commands the
00:20:35
politicians Well, as it should be in
00:20:36
reality and the military the military must
00:20:38
carry out this by the way, another
00:20:40
feature of Syrsky has no
00:20:42
political rating And Zaluzhny According to the
00:20:44
question, the political rating is twice as
00:20:45
high as the current president, he is a major
00:20:47
political figure, in fact, they see him
00:20:50
as the next qi Yes, and this too couldn’t, I don’t
00:20:53
think that was the main reason, but it
00:20:55
couldn’t help but aggravate, not be such a very
00:20:58
serious subtext in the relationship between
00:20:59
Zelensky and Zaluzhny, because
00:21:00
people were talking, one of whom is
00:21:02
already leaving, in fact, one way or another,
00:21:05
Zelensky’s ratings are falling, and
00:21:08
steadily by five percent per month Judging
00:21:11
by the polls, it is unlikely that he
00:21:13
will be able to reverse this trend, but it is clear that all the hardships of the
00:21:15
war affect the main
00:21:18
responsibility, the war is organized very
00:21:20
simply, the elders are always responsible for everything, and in
00:21:22
Zaluzhny, on the contrary, they are growing
00:21:25
And despite their embrace the heroes of Ukraine handed each other
00:21:29
and so on, they maintain
00:21:32
positive human relations,
00:21:34
but the crowds of these observers and
00:21:37
politicians who endlessly pedaled this
00:21:39
topic created an informational and
00:21:41
moral background that, of course, could not
00:21:43
affect their relations, even though
00:21:44
they treat others
00:21:45
normally as human beings And they are able to
00:21:47
hug, so this was also a factor
00:21:48
that must be said, but the main Factor
00:21:51
I think is simply a fundamental
00:21:53
human disagreement with the further
00:21:54
strategy. But the
00:21:57
political rating has no
00:21:59
direct political ambitions. There are no declared ones. No
00:22:00
one is measuring him; he is not
00:22:02
measuring his rating; he is a military man. He
00:22:03
does what he was ordered but I’m
00:22:05
saying the style of how he performs
00:22:07
made everyone wary now let
00:22:09
’s see how the event ends And what
00:22:11
will happen next It’s clear, you know, here’s something else
00:22:14
I pointed out here from Kazakhstan, in
00:22:16
any case It’s clear We
00:22:18
’re quite far away geographically, but we’re
00:22:22
still watching everything that’s happening
00:22:25
it seems that in Ukraine
00:22:28
today there is a loss of unity. Yes, there is
00:22:30
unity in opinion, unity in positions.
00:22:32
Yes, it’s as if everyone is starting among themselves
00:22:34
and they are just saying
00:22:37
that after Zalozh resigned,
00:22:40
he turns into a political figure and
00:22:42
again they talk about confrontation that
00:22:44
is, there is more talk
00:22:45
about confrontation about inconsistency
00:22:48
within the political elite in general, the elite of
00:22:51
Ukraine, the unity that was at the
00:22:54
beginning of the war in February of twenty-two is
00:22:57
not observed there for the first time,
00:23:01
this in fact also does not
00:23:03
add optimism, and maybe this is precisely a
00:23:05
consequence of the fact that The West also
00:23:09
probably feels some kind of uncertainty about who to
00:23:10
talk to. Where to move next, they
00:23:12
also probably don’t see a strategy. Maybe
00:23:14
this is a principle. Yes. There are two aspects. The
00:23:17
first unity is definitely lost;
00:23:19
we have opened all the old wounds that have accumulated over
00:23:22
centuries and the main lines of conflict are
00:23:24
Russian-speaking, Ukrainian-speaking there, and and
00:23:29
there are those who are for peace and those who are for war to a
00:23:31
victorious end, the third line is those
00:23:34
who left and those who
00:23:35
stayed, it must be said that the authorities with their
00:23:38
careless rhetoric, in my opinion, are not
00:23:40
entirely rational, they aggravate these
00:23:42
conflicts, several statements by the
00:23:43
president regarding those who left and those who
00:23:45
remained that these are citizens, and it’s
00:23:47
unclear who actually I translate into
00:23:49
simple language, they brought it to the point that even
00:23:51
Elena Zelenskaya The First Lady
00:23:52
objected to him publicly, she said, I believe
00:23:54
that all Ukrainians Yes, even those who left then, that’s
00:23:57
why But this is a sharp division between those who
00:23:59
serve and those who do not serve here is the fourth
00:24:01
line, it leads to the fact
00:24:03
that, well, society is really split
00:24:06
along many lines. There’s also the question,
00:24:10
which is also what we talked about at the beginning
00:24:12
when goals are declared that
00:24:14
cannot be achieved and a good face is put on a
00:24:15
bad game, although everyone knows that
00:24:17
the game is bad and mine is good This only
00:24:20
aggravates the pressure on all lines of cleavage
00:24:22
because the Central line sounds like they are
00:24:24
lying to us, but things are much much
00:24:29
worse, which creates the ground for
00:24:31
many rumors, contradictions, and
00:24:33
any conspiracy theories that are
00:24:34
immediately used by some of the policies
00:24:36
used by the enemy through
00:24:38
information operations and so on In
00:24:40
general, we are like a broken cauldron where
00:24:42
One part, or rather, is
00:24:44
sick, this very soup where One part
00:24:46
hates the other now Yes, we have a very
00:24:48
difficult situation in this sense. So
00:24:51
the lines are really getting worse. In addition,
00:24:53
there is also the Central line of split,
00:24:55
Zelensky’s strategy radically does not
00:24:56
coincide with the strategy and the West
00:24:59
Uh-huh in the West,
00:25:02
perhaps only one wants a war to a victorious end Britain she
00:25:04
she For example, the
00:25:05
United States of Europe
00:25:07
insists on this The international bureaucracy would also
00:25:10
quite
00:25:11
want the negotiations that
00:25:13
Putin insists on publicly says I generally want
00:25:15
Negotiation Yes Putin in Carlson’s interview
00:25:18
He said several times Yes, I am ready for
00:25:20
negotiations Yes, and Zelensky Yes
00:25:23
Zelensky made a decision and approved it with
00:25:26
his decree and the order of the
00:25:28
National Defense Security Council that it is
00:25:29
impossible to conduct any negotiations with Putin at all,
00:25:30
this is what Putin pointed out in
00:25:32
his interview with Carlson and it turns out that the
00:25:37
West sees whom between the West and
00:25:39
Zelensky the same thing is happening
00:25:41
between what between Zelensky and the pledged,
00:25:42
that is, a complete discrepancy in strategies
00:25:44
or a significant discrepancy in strategies
00:25:46
in which a normal dialogue is impossible
00:25:48
b the talk of any help becomes
00:25:50
problematic, but it is very difficult for you
00:25:52
to help a person who says that
00:25:54
I will send your help not as you would
00:25:55
like and count on your price nuno
00:25:59
you let's let's let's Yes, we have
00:26:01
international problems coming, we'll be
00:26:04
very
00:26:05
focused that there has been no American assistance for
00:26:07
2 months. It's critical, it's just
00:26:10
critical and it's not known when they will give it. We
00:26:13
see what's happening in the USA and Will they give it
00:26:15
at all?
00:26:16
Therefore, the prospects are very complex, I would
00:26:20
say so,
00:26:26
even if at the same time our Supreme Power
00:26:29
demonstrates
00:26:30
that optimism and the desire to reach the borders of the
00:26:33
ninety-first year when
00:26:36
they would overcome all these moral dilemmas
00:26:37
much easier if they
00:26:39
started talking to society as with
00:26:40
adults and tell the complete truth,
00:26:43
but we carefully pretend that they are
00:26:46
still pretending that everything is fine. Great
00:26:48
Marquise, so temporary difficulties and then
00:26:50
we will definitely be here.
00:26:52
Well, as for American assistance,
00:26:55
last week it also seemed to be
00:26:56
approved that there is help
00:26:59
uh the whole case yes about passed one
00:27:02
of the repartitions it is clear there will be necessary Yes And there
00:27:04
remains a congress in the congress and in
00:27:06
the senate the democratic majority in
00:27:08
the congress is republican so how
00:27:09
they will vote is not at all
00:27:11
obvious we will see, but I want to
00:27:13
emphasize that even when they give us
00:27:15
American aid, firstly, it
00:27:17
will be given as a one-time thing, it will not be at all the
00:27:19
level of support that was a year ago.
00:27:21
These 2 years are not at all the same,
00:27:25
it is incomparable. It will be missed and secondly, it will be at least not all of it will be
00:27:27
military, yeah. There are less than 10 billion out of 60
00:27:30
billion e is for purely military assistance,
00:27:33
so even this, Well, by no means will not
00:27:37
radically correct the situation, it will simply give the
00:27:39
opportunity to fight further, if it
00:27:41
is not there or if it drags on for a long time,
00:27:43
the situation could be catastrophic, the front
00:27:44
may collapse on a couple of sectors
00:27:46
at once, the enemy may slip in front of a
00:27:47
kilometer at 50 This is what, in modern
00:27:50
times, means that it will have the
00:27:52
first operational success during the entire
00:27:54
war and will have an even more serious impact on the
00:27:56
morale of
00:27:58
the front and on the international situation of the
00:28:00
people and on the international
00:28:01
position of Ukraine, so I see a way out in
00:28:04
correcting the information policy and
00:28:06
starting a serious dialogue with a
00:28:08
serious society, but we need to come to unity.
00:28:11
Yes, we need to agree on some common denominator
00:28:13
first inside. Yes, a house
00:28:15
split inside, like a kingdom split
00:28:18
inside, cannot stand. We know this, and the nuance is
00:28:21
that we need to find moral strength in ourselves
00:28:24
because at the price of what the
00:28:25
president will say in this case how but
00:28:28
the commander as a result of a serious
00:28:29
dialogue first Can raise
00:28:31
a lot of questions in society the beginning of a dialogue if
00:28:33
it starts, that is, society will begin to
00:28:35
ask questions: How did they allow the war to happen in the first place
00:28:36
and how did they prepare for it for this
00:28:38
war Why are there no fortifications at Vyra there and
00:28:40
many, many other questions that,
00:28:42
firstly, it will be difficult for him to answer, and
00:28:43
secondly, they may cost him his political
00:28:45
career Uh-huh And I think that the contradictions
00:28:48
lie in the fact that concern for a possible
00:28:50
future political career is clearly
00:28:53
tied to the bravura slogan about the borders of the
00:28:56
ninety-first year and reluctance conduct a
00:28:58
serious, responsible dialogue with
00:29:00
society, which will only
00:29:02
aggravate the situation. And now we take this:
00:29:04
we have had a Verkhovna Rada for almost six months, well,
00:29:07
a little less than a month, six
00:29:10
months short of a month and a half, it has exceeded its
00:29:13
powers in terms of 28 network elections,
00:29:15
now we have three
00:29:18
presidential elections which were supposed to
00:29:20
pass but will not pass. And May 20 is his
00:29:23
inauguration day. That is,
00:29:25
the powers of five years actually expire,
00:29:28
and then the Ukrainian Constitution did not
00:29:30
provide for such a provision and,
00:29:33
accordingly, it becomes possible
00:29:34
for interpretations in any direction of Article 108,
00:29:36
which determines the reasons for
00:29:38
which the president it may leave, it does not
00:29:41
provide for or stay does not
00:29:45
provide for the extension of powers as
00:29:47
a result of hostilities, but
00:29:48
when in the last year no one accepted this
00:29:50
sa
00:29:56
nito with illegitimate said Not
00:30:00
me, here we have an already crowded
00:30:03
information space officially
00:30:05
unofficially They are silently grumbling and asking
00:30:07
questions and now it turns out that
00:30:10
the president of whose tenure there will be
00:30:13
questions regarding
00:30:15
legitimacy after already after April 31,
00:30:18
this is a month and a half left. Moreover, against the
00:30:20
backdrop of the re-election of the President of the Russian
00:30:26
Federation in the first place, how will he
00:30:28
implement an unpopular decision
00:30:30
related to the mobilization of the need to
00:30:32
delay raising military
00:30:35
taxes there, tightening politics because so that
00:30:37
to carry out unpopular decisions
00:30:39
you need a lot of trust on the
00:30:40
part of society for legitimacy, and here
00:30:42
legitimacy will be suspended, let’s say, and
00:30:44
secondly, how will Western assistance go and
00:30:46
how will they communicate with the president? We will move
00:30:48
our powers to the West, with which we are already
00:30:51
full of contradictions. That is, we will have
00:30:53
this factor added. in the spring and it
00:30:55
will be added very strongly and stabilization,
00:30:58
as if he, too, is not he, he will
00:31:02
not add stability either, but on the contrary, it will strengthen all the
00:31:04
existing main four splits,
00:31:07
five including the split by the West, the
00:31:09
problem will be further strengthened, that
00:31:12
is, we are entering the spring in such a still turbulent period, it is
00:31:14
still quite serious
00:31:16
exit I said where, but unfortunately this
00:31:18
way out could cost the president the rest of his
00:31:21
rating if he starts a serious dialogue
00:31:23
with society, a statesman, a
00:31:25
historical figure, could sacrifice
00:31:27
himself for the sake of the country. Whether Zelensky can do this is
00:31:29
unknown to anyone. Therefore, for now we are
00:31:32
watching. Well, to be honest,
00:31:35
we also see
00:31:39
and hear this rhetoric we understand what
00:31:44
people close to
00:31:46
President Zelensky’s entourage are saying that
00:31:50
elections in the country can now cause a
00:31:54
negative reaction, in fact, the country
00:31:57
is in a state of war and can
00:32:00
cause destabilization within society,
00:32:01
but on the other hand, I understand perfectly well
00:32:03
that
00:32:06
And the president should be elected elected by
00:32:10
the whole society, everyone must confirm
00:32:11
this,
00:32:13
and there must be unity within the country. And
00:32:17
at the international level, other countries
00:32:19
that sign documents must
00:32:21
sign with the legitimate president,
00:32:24
too. Whose signature is on the document, too, it’s the same
00:32:26
as if
00:32:27
American aid is not American
00:32:30
aid, it’s citizens’ money USA, they
00:32:33
will also ask some kind of answer Where did they spend the
00:32:35
money with whom Yes with whom are we talking for what who is
00:32:39
signing up for what we are signing up for, that
00:32:41
is, there are really a lot of questions
00:32:43
But the question I would like to ask is this, I
00:32:47
understand I also heard your position that
00:32:49
elections should be held looks like
00:32:52
indeed it is so, but won’t this cause
00:32:54
destabilization inside
00:32:59
I don’t see why they should cause
00:33:00
destabilization, we actually have a
00:33:02
consensus on the figure of
00:33:04
Zaluzhny, the majority of people
00:33:06
support him in the country, the majority and the
00:33:09
elections will definitely end, this is
00:33:11
understandable And here very
00:33:13
bad people arise, they will elect him I don’t think that
00:33:15
someone will fundamentally object
00:33:16
to Zaluzhny’s position. I even have a hard time
00:33:19
imagining politicians who in
00:33:20
this situation will go to the
00:33:22
polls because they will have to be
00:33:25
in polemics and then criticize him
00:33:27
and propose some kind of alternative
00:33:28
program. And this is a sure way to destroy
00:33:30
your rating in the eyes of the people who
00:33:32
now adores Zaluzhny, but that is, this is
00:33:35
political suicide, so
00:33:36
Zaluzhny can win practically without
00:33:38
alternatively now in one round Yes, in
00:33:40
one round in one round very Yes very
00:33:42
quickly specifically and so on, but here
00:33:44
or in two rounds but with almost practically
00:33:49
no alternative the situation gives rise to a
00:33:51
very bad
00:33:52
[music]
00:33:54
soil For various Innu
00:33:57
and outside Ukraine Especially considering
00:34:00
Russian information operations and
00:34:02
other pressure in this sense and other
00:34:04
enemies of Ukraine Or there are ill-wishers
00:34:06
or figures who are in a strange relationship
00:34:09
with Ukraine, for example Orban and
00:34:11
his Political Party, so this is what
00:34:14
it is very clearly
00:34:18
slowly slowly a connection is being established
00:34:20
and one day it will be established very firmly and it
00:34:23
will become a common place for salting over the
00:34:27
next d months that Zelensky needs
00:34:30
a war and a continuation of the war just
00:34:31
to maintain power such voices are
00:34:33
already heard But this is a very
00:34:36
undesirable ground for any dialogue with
00:34:39
the West is not the West of
00:34:41
the DAD and there will be a lot of speculation for the internal situation. For example,
00:34:44
some
00:34:46
political forces in Ukraine are
00:34:47
already using this slogan with
00:34:49
might and main, but they are abandoning it openly or secretly, but
00:34:52
I think that after
00:34:54
March 31 it will become a common place
00:34:57
and this will only aggravate all the processes, it will
00:35:00
only aggravate And here we need personal
00:35:03
courage from President Zelensky, a
00:35:04
lot of personal courage to seriously
00:35:06
begin a serious dialogue with society on
00:35:08
key issues, for example the issue of power
00:35:10
and the issue of future strategy. Uh-huh, but he has
00:35:13
already spoken out in principle, he also said
00:35:16
that the position is known Yes, his position
00:35:20
is known will lead to what I said
00:35:24
and it will only aggravate the situation,
00:35:27
now the
00:35:29
question arises what next after the aggravation
00:35:32
Will he change, will he find the
00:35:33
courage to change this
00:35:36
position, in fact, the split inside is
00:35:41
quite serious, but again, it can
00:35:44
all depend on the individual Yes, there is a role for the
00:35:46
individual Maybe he will behave like that story and so the
00:35:48
story from this the situation will change
00:35:51
internal issue
00:35:57
any question of help and the
00:36:00
positioning of key political
00:36:02
figures in this war for us it is therefore
00:36:06
clear that if help comes then the
00:36:08
situation will
00:36:11
push back the issue of positioning of figures the
00:36:14
solution to the issue of power and strategy of the war
00:36:16
will be resolved but with us, look two
00:36:18
main issues of power,
00:36:20
war strategy, or else I’m stuck in the fact that for someone, the
00:36:23
question of continuation
00:36:25
in power is not me who said that. I’m just
00:36:29
showing it to our viewers
00:36:31
because I respect our viewers, I want
00:36:32
them to understand the situation. But the fact
00:36:35
that this will become the subject of all sorts of
00:36:36
speculation will only making the situation more difficult
00:36:38
This I guarantee 10% Yeah,
00:36:42
another question is that regarding
00:36:45
peaceful negotiations about peace, one way or another, we all
00:36:48
know that any war, no matter how severe or
00:36:51
terrible it is, ends at the
00:36:53
negotiating table and the parties agree on something.
00:36:58
That’s your feeling. in
00:37:02
[music]
00:37:04
Ukraine How will society be disposed
00:37:07
If suddenly it understands that there
00:37:11
will be no borders in 1991, this is how it
00:37:13
will be
00:37:14
perceived. The November poll showed
00:37:17
public opinion showed that 29% of
00:37:19
Ukrainians are ready for negotiations, they
00:37:20
said
00:37:22
it, yes in November it would have
00:37:25
been so bad there was only talk about the
00:37:29
lack of American assistance. And now
00:37:30
it has been absent for a couple of months. I think
00:37:33
that the April measurements, for example, will show
00:37:36
a shift in the number of people in favor of
00:37:38
negotiations. Now the question arises if
00:37:40
it ever reaches
00:37:42
50% and we will have parallels, although 29
00:37:46
is a very large number this is a third of
00:37:47
Ukrainians in question Well, now let’s say
00:37:51
it reaches half somewhere in May
00:37:53
April and at this time we are mobilizing the bus using
00:37:57
methods that we know When
00:37:59
we have enough people on the streets Although
00:38:01
it is said that the new law on
00:38:02
mobilization should save us from
00:38:05
Well, Ukrainians don’t really believe that they
00:38:08
will be spared from this;
00:38:10
a situation arises, from their point of view, people are being
00:38:13
forcibly taken into the army and they want
00:38:15
peace negotiations; this situation is capable of
00:38:18
completely blowing up society, that is,
00:38:20
leading people to the point that they will
00:38:22
directly sabotage the mobilization or
00:38:23
will directly sabotage fulfilling
00:38:25
one's obligations is the military Well, at the front, having already
00:38:28
been sent to the front, we have brigades of
00:38:30
units in which from 30 to 70% are conscientious
00:38:32
objectors,
00:38:33
what will happen next you can only
00:38:36
imagine, that is, a person can be
00:38:37
caught, put on a uniform, brought to the front, he
00:38:39
will throw the machine gun and say I judge but I I’m
00:38:41
not participating in the war, the stability of the front, the
00:38:43
stability of our entire position,
00:38:45
internal and external, in this in this in
00:38:47
this situation, it
00:38:51
becomes very problematic if there is no
00:38:53
American help, or even if there is some,
00:38:55
but such as it is, then this is all
00:38:58
aggravated by the fact that the war is not only not I want to
00:39:00
wage, but I don’t really have anything to
00:39:02
wage war on,
00:39:04
so the question of peace every day
00:39:07
will be peace negotiations will
00:39:08
become more acute and acute
00:39:10
more serious The only way is to
00:39:12
cure or rather the scenario to correct
00:39:14
this suddenly suddenly a huge amount of
00:39:17
fundamental help of some kind for example
00:39:18
namm give 500 owl attacks and the situation at
00:39:22
the front and a lot of aviation the situation at
00:39:24
the front changes radically not in favor of the
00:39:25
enemy uh-huh Then yes but I remind you that
00:39:29
even after this you still need a
00:39:31
lot of elementary siina a lot of ankle boots a
00:39:35
lot of uniforms a lot of rations
00:39:38
a lot of machine guns a lot
00:39:40
ammunition so that you
00:39:42
won’t win the war with missiles alone. Although
00:39:43
the situation can be changed very much at the front,
00:39:45
so the situation is going in a
00:39:48
direction
00:39:49
that Well, we can’t win the war.
00:39:52
It’s obvious with this level of assistance,
00:39:55
second, there will be no borders of the year,
00:39:59
third, the question is where the front line will stop.
00:40:00
in one way or another and
00:40:03
what position Russia is in
00:40:05
and what concessions it is ready to make on
00:40:08
this matter, there are two
00:40:10
main opinions, which means two main
00:40:13
three or four main scenarios, the opinion
00:40:14
sounds like this Russia also puts a good
00:40:17
face on a bad game in fact it has
00:40:18
economic holes problems
00:40:21
[music]
00:40:25
budget consequences of sanctions that do not
00:40:27
add to the health of the Russian economy
00:40:29
do not add to the prospects of Russia itself
00:40:30
as a state So they, too, would like to
00:40:34
stop the war temporarily Because in order
00:40:37
to get rid of sanctions from sanctions
00:40:41
so as not to lead to a situation of
00:40:44
overvoltage in Russia itself Uh-huh, on the other
00:40:47
hand, there is an opinion that Russia can
00:40:49
hold out for another two years And it is ready
00:40:52
to pay a very heavy price for a
00:40:53
formal victory in the war that it
00:40:55
is waging against the West. Let’s just say that the
00:40:57
federal budget deficit of 3.23
00:41:00
trillion rubles turned out to be only part of a
00:41:03
larger hole and the consolidated budget of the
00:41:05
Russian Federation in the third year, according to a preliminary
00:41:06
estimate of the Federal Treasury, was
00:41:08
executed with a deficit of 3.91 trillion rubles,
00:41:12
which is almost twice as much as a year
00:41:13
earlier; in the twenty-second year, the deficit was
00:41:16
2.11 trillion rubles.
00:41:19
Consolidated budget revenues for the year
00:41:20
increased by 11% to expenses of
00:41:24
14.1 this shows that not everything is in order
00:41:27
with the economy, no matter what they say
00:41:29
Russian, but there is a second opinion that they are
00:41:31
stubborn and will
00:41:33
fight to the end, as it is technically
00:41:36
expressed, different towers of the Kremlin, as they
00:41:38
say, they want different things. I think
00:41:39
that the military felt the taste of success They
00:41:41
say we pushed them through the Second World War and so on,
00:41:44
but there are, for example, liberals who are very clearly
00:41:46
tied to interaction with the West,
00:41:47
there are special services that understand that
00:41:50
internal tension is growing in Russia Yeah, the question of the
00:41:52
political situation, the question of
00:41:55
re-elections,
00:41:56
the question of the possible holding of a new
00:41:59
oprichnina in Russia after Putin’s victory,
00:42:01
many are talking about purges there are no
00:42:03
new Elites and so
00:42:05
on against the background of the war, well, carry out some
00:42:09
other tasks facing Russia, it is
00:42:11
difficult to solve, we have Putin’s position,
00:42:13
it lies in the fact that he has
00:42:14
repeatedly publicly
00:42:16
said that Yes, I am ready for peace, from my
00:42:18
point of view, Putin is the key figure
00:42:20
he has two options that are equivalent for themselves.
00:42:23
He can continue to fight, he wants to
00:42:26
talk to him, but he would be happy to
00:42:27
make peace at this stage if they
00:42:29
went for peace and directly calls for him,
00:42:32
appealing to the Istanbul agreements
00:42:34
that were in March 2009, in which I
00:42:36
took part, about which I also
00:42:37
said many times, that’s why he has
00:42:39
two Well, in almost equivalent
00:42:42
scenarios, if you want to fight, we’ll fight
00:42:44
Well then, as if Who isn’t hiding, I’m not to
00:42:46
blame, if you want to negotiate, we’ll
00:42:47
negotiate, but Ukraine is in
00:42:48
position, there are no negotiations, all the
00:42:50
mobiles before the war are not really
00:42:53
able to have this war continue, therefore,
00:42:57
as the situation on the front line worsens
00:43:00
and with mobilization, I think the Armed
00:43:02
Forces will be more proponents of peace. And when
00:43:05
their number approaches n or more,
00:43:08
then the Ukrainian government, Whoever was
00:43:11
then the head of Ukraine There and so on
00:43:13
will be forced to make an
00:43:14
appropriate decision somehow
00:43:16
be determined in relation to peace
00:43:18
negotiations because it is impossible to force Nanie to get out,
00:43:20
especially in secrecy as Ukraine
00:43:25
obviously does not want to do this already
00:43:27
difficulties with 29 a Let's see what will happen
00:43:30
this November data maybe even more a Let's
00:43:32
see what happens later this
00:43:36
graph 50% I think somewhere should be by the
00:43:39
beginning of summer, maybe the beginning of autumn,
00:43:42
depending on whether they will give help or not. Well,
00:43:44
that is, this is a question. In any
00:43:46
case, the next year, not even
00:43:48
six months or months, that the number of
00:43:51
supporters of ending the war in Ukraine
00:43:52
will reach 50% is a fact that
00:43:55
cannot be ignored
00:43:56
it will need to be responded to. So
00:44:00
this is our immediate strategic
00:44:02
perspective, the number of people who
00:44:04
yearn for peace. I think the mobilization
00:44:06
is carried out this way and then the way it will be
00:44:08
carried out, it will only strengthen the number of
00:44:10
supporters of the peace process and this will be a
00:44:12
more serious challenge, not just a military
00:44:14
historical challenge that
00:44:16
Ukraine will have to go through and somehow decide
00:44:17
even Regardless of whether there will be
00:44:19
elections, it won’t be you who will be in power,
00:44:21
but it seems to me that it matters whether there will be
00:44:23
elections or not,
00:44:25
because Zelensky’s
00:44:27
diplomatic maneuver is not particularly important because
00:44:29
he stated that he will not
00:44:33
even negotiate
00:44:35
legislatively, and even Zelensky, with his
00:44:38
focus on war to the bitter end,
00:44:39
will not be able to ignore 50% of the people for the world,
00:44:42
this is technically impossible, they will simply not
00:44:43
carry out his orders,
00:44:44
this will result in the fact that he will
00:44:45
sabotage the mobilization, that’s
00:44:47
all, and something will have to be done, but even
00:44:50
technically, to go to negotiations, someone
00:44:52
must go to negotiations from the other side
00:44:55
and the Ukrainian side, someone must also
00:44:57
be there, this is also a
00:45:00
question, yes, but he raises the question of what it
00:45:03
means for us, he does not pose, but raised that it is
00:45:05
forbidden to negotiate at all with
00:45:06
Russia, that is, we will still
00:45:07
have to get out of this trap. But there is a way out of this,
00:45:09
in fact, what way out is
00:45:12
that the
00:45:13
reason for this war was the sum of
00:45:16
contradictions that have accumulated since the
00:45:17
ninety-first year since the collapse of the
00:45:18
Soviet Union, but they exist not
00:45:21
only between Ukraine and Russia But between the
00:45:23
entire European space, all the
00:45:25
political players that exist in it.
00:45:27
This is a series with
00:45:30
the same, underneath them lies the same sum of
00:45:33
reasons that under
00:45:34
Azerbaijan, the Armenian conflict and
00:45:37
many other zones of
00:45:39
tension, and here you can pose a
00:45:42
broader question: what under Damo, the Yalta
00:45:44
system, which was
00:45:46
formed as a result of the Second World
00:45:48
War in 1945 and was in effect until the
00:45:50
9th year before the start of a major war in the
00:45:52
center of Europe in Yugoslavia Yeah, hundreds of
00:45:55
thousands stopped working a long time ago in the
00:45:57
9th year, the Ukrainian war is now
00:46:00
all Russian-Ukrainian, it
00:46:02
is only an extreme expression of the fact that this
00:46:04
system does not work, the
00:46:06
Helsinki Treaty on the Inviolability of Borders
00:46:08
does not work, the system of treaties on the
00:46:09
limitation of arms does not
00:46:11
work, nothing works, the Budapest Agreement does not
00:46:13
work at all, the Budapest Agreements
00:46:15
and so on, and it is necessary to create a new
00:46:17
security system in Europe that takes into account
00:46:19
collective security
00:46:21
real players of the parties
00:46:24
including Russia and Belarus
00:46:26
all and enter into a serious
00:46:28
responsible real dialogue of all
00:46:30
parties Negotiations can last as long as desired At least
00:46:32
10 years create this
00:46:34
system but the main task of which
00:46:36
is to prevent the active hot
00:46:38
phase of war, that is, to create a mechanism
00:46:40
when conflicts can be resolved by other
00:46:41
methods they are at the cost of killing hundreds of thousands of
00:46:43
people, destroying the economy, creating waves of
00:46:46
refugees, and so on and so on, and it would be possible to
00:46:48
do this if politicians
00:46:50
were responsible on both sides on all
00:46:53
sides, more precisely for now Yes, not yet in
00:46:57
sight, so the alternative is a
00:46:59
long big war look, the
00:47:01
Baltic countries are already strengthening their
00:47:03
Western borders with all their might, and all Western
00:47:06
officials, including the head of NATO, say
00:47:08
that ahead of a clash with Russia, the
00:47:10
Polish representatives say, the heads of
00:47:12
the intelligence services, the Minister of Defense of Denmark there and
00:47:14
others of Sweden, Britain say we are preparing
00:47:17
for a clash with Russia, we are preparing for a
00:47:18
big war in Europe the alternative
00:47:21
is a big war in Europe or there a
00:47:24
collective translation of this situation in
00:47:26
Ukraine could be very simple, that we the
00:47:29
president even has this formula, there is
00:47:31
this springboard, he proposed it at the beginning of the
00:47:33
war, also the so-called peace formulas in
00:47:34
which at the last meeting that
00:47:36
representatives took In more states, we
00:47:39
can say that it is necessary to raise the question not
00:47:41
only of ending the
00:47:42
Russian-Ukrainian war, but also of
00:47:44
creating a new system that does not allow
00:47:46
these wars to resume in one
00:47:47
form or another, not only between Russia and
00:47:49
Ukraine, but also between Russia and the
00:47:50
Baltic countries, and so on. That’s
00:47:53
why let’s just start from the
00:47:56
Peace Formula, which is a
00:47:58
platform as a political groundwork, and
00:48:00
invite Russia to collective negotiations.
00:48:01
Moreover, during the
00:48:03
last summit in Malta they directly
00:48:05
said that Russia will be invited one day
00:48:06
When we get a
00:48:08
consolidated position of the
00:48:10
powers already there and please
00:48:12
bring up the topic of negotiations,
00:48:14
raise the frame much higher than the
00:48:16
Russian-Ukrainian won, then the general
00:48:18
world order must be a world order, yes Or
00:48:20
order in Europe, you bypass the frame of the
00:48:22
Russian-Ukrainian war And your own
00:48:24
prohibitions to negotiate with them, you
00:48:26
do not negotiate with them, these are
00:48:27
collective negotiations And you there
00:48:28
may be bilateral consultations within the
00:48:29
framework of these negotiations on health, that
00:48:31
’s all, no one has banned them; the same
00:48:33
consultations are held by 60 countries,
00:48:35
including us and Russia; this can be
00:48:37
circumvented and come out of this situation gracefully
00:48:39
with dignity. If there was a desire, but I
00:48:42
think the desire is now Probably there is
00:48:44
because this military rhetoric,
00:48:46
which is sounding more and more actively, it
00:48:50
scares the inhabitants and residents of Europe, probably
00:48:54
first of all, it scares me, in my opinion, no
00:48:56
one really
00:48:58
wants to fight there. In general, in my opinion, they are not ready to fight at all. I don’t see any
00:49:01
desires. Russia talks endlessly about
00:49:03
negotiations. No one is inviting Russia to negotiations, no
00:49:05
one Have you heard at least one
00:49:08
statement? This is We are inviting Russia to
00:49:09
negotiations, this is official. Everyone is talking about the
00:49:11
desirability of negotiations, but no one is
00:49:12
inviting, so here is the story of
00:49:15
saying that everyone wants it. It’s difficult. Well,
00:49:19
yes, I also agree, one more question Alexey,
00:49:23
here we are talking constantly American
00:49:27
assistance, assistance from Western countries, and
00:49:30
Ukraine itself, the military-industrial complex of Ukraine works, but
00:49:33
Ukraine itself is generally able to provide
00:49:35
itself, to some extent, with rows of cartridges,
00:49:39
ammunition,
00:49:40
food, everything that works, we
00:49:43
can, I no one knows the exact numbers, according to
00:49:46
my assessment, we can the needs of our
00:49:47
Armed Forces percent according to different things from n
00:49:50
to 20, provide Well, for example, in
00:49:53
food for 20 But there, in terms of
00:49:54
shell n from the necessary, this is a
00:49:57
vanishing small value, of course, not
00:49:58
a single state can completely
00:50:00
provide for itself the needs of the war except the
00:50:01
United States during the Second
00:50:03
World War. That’s why Russia has created
00:50:07
itself provides, in my opinion, now,
00:50:08
calm down Well, she provides for herself at the expense of
00:50:11
very
00:50:14
serious things. She is in an osm position;
00:50:16
she has something to trade oil and gas there,
00:50:18
for example, yes, well, she has something that we don’t have; and
00:50:20
secondly, how would she create too
00:50:22
big a state? In addition, Putin However, the
00:50:24
strategists made a decision and performed a very
00:50:26
important trick; he managed to turn around the situation of the
00:50:28
conflict between Russia, Ukraine, or even Russia,
00:50:30
NATO, and changed the frame to the global south
00:50:33
against the global West. Well, yes,
00:50:34
the rapid expansion of the Brix. Yes, yes, yes,
00:50:36
anti-colonial rhetoric,
00:50:38
a change in the position of the countries of Latin
00:50:39
America, Africa, in favor of Russia and against the
00:50:41
West shows that in general the ins and outs of
00:50:45
this conflict are global,
00:50:46
not even pan-European, that is, there are a lot of
00:50:48
claims against the West from the
00:50:50
global south, these claims are not
00:50:52
resolved, the rhetoric is like this
00:50:54
[music]
00:50:56
bet that in Israel, Creation also exists in this
00:50:59
conflict of the global world
00:51:02
and what is
00:51:04
happening with Kusita is now attacking
00:51:07
ships 14% of world maritime trade yes this is a
00:51:10
huge figure the
00:51:11
problem the conflict is wearing The Earth has accumulated The
00:51:14
planet has accumulated a sum of contradictions So
00:51:16
they break through here and there
00:51:23
and with Lisa to win the Second
00:51:26
World War I don’t think that he would have won
00:51:29
yes Therefore although he was a fairly
00:51:31
self-sufficient economy, but the severity of
00:51:33
the blow, the amount of destroyed captured
00:51:34
industry, resources, the entire European
00:51:36
part, in fact, led to the fact that
00:51:41
Ukraine was needed, our problem is that
00:51:43
we spent 32 years of
00:51:47
insecurity, we, roughly speaking,
00:51:48
declared foreign policy cast was
00:51:51
elements of internal resources and we
00:51:53
totally at the dawn goals depended on external
00:51:57
players, a simple example: We really want the EU
00:51:59
and NATO, even in the Constitution they wrote down
00:52:00
the question whether the EU and NATO are waiting for us, very
00:52:02
problematic for us already now, three three
00:52:04
signals in a row, there were two yesterday and
00:52:06
the day before yesterday at the level of defense ministers
00:52:08
of different countries, politicians that do not wait for an
00:52:10
invitation in NATO, in fact, they are talking
00:52:12
at the summit in Washington in June of this
00:52:14
month, which they really hoped for
00:52:16
after we were not invited to
00:52:18
Vilnius Yeah last June and so
00:52:20
on, so this is all a very distant
00:52:22
prospect,
00:52:26
Russia even reacted very sharply to this prospect having started a war to
00:52:29
ensure, as they say, their
00:52:31
legitimate interests in the area of ​​the soft
00:52:34
underbelly of Russia in the region of Ukraine,
00:52:36
preventing it from joining the anti-Russian,
00:52:38
as they consider NATO, military Union,
00:52:40
so we declared and implemented goals
00:52:42
for which We did not have the resource, we
00:52:45
wanted what we wanted we will have to
00:52:47
pay with a major war and we pay without
00:52:49
having the means of waging war, this is
00:52:51
infantilism and the childish Ukrainian policy of the
00:52:54
childish Ukrainian society, the
00:52:55
fundamental reason for everything that
00:52:57
is happening except for the
00:53:02
expansionist tendency in Russia and
00:53:04
Russian infantilism, or rather Ukrainian,
00:53:06
which did not calculate this in time and even
00:53:08
pulled and teased Russia by the mustache tiger like
00:53:11
this, pursuing a policy that, well, clearly
00:53:15
led to war, but at the same time not preparing for
00:53:18
this war, we are paying a very high
00:53:22
price for this, we will pay more first What and
00:53:26
most importantly what will Ukraine learn if it
00:53:27
survives this war at all
00:53:29
what or if more broadly so to speak in
00:53:33
this geopolitical
00:53:34
conflict of which the war is only a
00:53:37
part of which it is necessary to carry out a
00:53:39
secured policy a policy that
00:53:41
we are able to provide with our own
00:53:43
resources It is clear to expect that we will be able to
00:53:45
fight with Russia whose military budget
00:53:47
there is a couple of dozen times
00:53:49
greater than us and our capabilities themselves
00:53:53
are unrealistic, but at least we
00:53:56
need to withdraw so that the military can provide 50% of their needs
00:53:58
and all of their own.
00:54:01
I hope you are convinced that despite all
00:54:02
the ranting,
00:54:10
and even for states located on the
00:54:13
fault of geopolitical plates such as
00:54:15
Ukraine, and if we do not cover 50% of our needs,
00:54:24
it is very difficult to say
00:54:26
what our entire territory is being shot at by
00:54:28
Russian Russian missiles, which
00:54:30
means we need to build factories somewhere
00:54:33
in the Carpathian Mountains in the west in the west, yes, yes, there is a
00:54:36
huge, huge, difficult
00:54:39
problem in the west that had to be given up; it
00:54:41
had to be given up a long time ago. But instead, we
00:54:43
joyfully unloaded and told
00:54:45
that everyone loved us and there will be no war That is
00:54:48
why even 10 years of war from the
00:54:53
field of a direct war with Russia in a
00:54:57
hybrid proxy version, but the war with
00:54:59
Russia did not force us to seriously
00:55:01
engage in the defense of the country, monstrous
00:55:04
infantilism and the payment for it is monstrous in
00:55:07
the future, I hope that we have
00:55:10
learned, although here there are many problems.
00:55:13
For example, our infantilism
00:55:16
is superimposed on the monstrous infantilism of the
00:55:17
West. Uh-huh. But here’s a simple example:
00:55:19
when Kherson was taken on November 11, 2018, the
00:55:23
West sharply reduced the intensity of
00:55:25
supplies of military equipment for armaments and
00:55:27
began negotiations with Russia. Putin, do not
00:55:29
join the winter company. Putin responded by
00:55:31
building a line. Surikina
00:55:32
mobilization in preparation for battle,
00:55:35
so the counter-offensive failed
00:55:38
could not help but fail, we let
00:55:39
them dig in for 9 months, all this time there was a Peace
00:55:41
Dialogue for the first 3 months they did not
00:55:43
supply military equipment at all.
00:55:45
I also saw this in the trilateral
00:55:47
contact group and in the Normandy
00:55:49
format it amazed me deeply
00:55:50
souls This is infantilism because as
00:55:52
soon as peace negotiations
00:55:54
cease, the
00:55:57
intention to prepare for war immediately stops, and the West
00:56:00
suddenly began to relax. Well, how about
00:56:03
peace, the Armed Forces, you can not spend money and
00:56:05
this is a very simple idea that if you
00:56:07
want the Romans even the ancients said
00:56:10
that you want peace prepare for war, what is the
00:56:12
best way to ensure peace? Given this, in
00:56:15
such moods of your neighbors, the
00:56:19
plan of preparations for the war
00:56:23
will not be successful, then
00:56:27
peace will be guaranteed; this is a simple thought that
00:56:29
did not fit; we pay, I repeat the
00:56:31
monstrous theme, the price and we will also pay for
00:56:34
our infantilism. superimposed on the
00:56:36
infantilism of the global West right
00:56:38
now When America does not give us help
00:56:41
and says what sober American
00:56:44
politicians say Well then American
00:56:45
soldiers will die in Europe and Trump
00:56:48
says to this Yes, I generally
00:56:50
won’t help Rapu NATO and, moreover, I will
00:56:51
encourage countries Russia to attack
00:56:53
NATO countries that do not pay anything other than
00:56:55
infantilism, you can’t call it isolationism, they are trying
00:56:57
to call
00:56:58
isolationism some kind of
00:57:00
American internal policy, in fact, this is the
00:57:02
monstrous monstrous infantilism into
00:57:04
which our Western and our
00:57:07
Ukrainian Western policy grew after the
00:57:08
end was announced in December
00:57:10
history, when the West decided, it won and
00:57:13
now Everything is now grabbed by God by the beard, it’s
00:57:23
clear that no one wants to be
00:57:26
pro-Western, moreover, no one is
00:57:29
afraid of the West anymore So the West also declared the axis of evil,
00:57:33
he spoke With moral categories in
00:57:35
politics, the axis of evil, the axis of good But if you
00:57:37
declared evil, so go fight this
00:57:39
evil, but you don’t fight, as it were, and
00:57:41
therefore, too, hypocrisy and infantilism -
00:57:44
This is a monstrous payment we pay and the West will
00:57:46
also pay, I’m 10% sure because
00:57:48
I practically believe that a
00:57:50
clash between Russia and Europe is inevitable, you consider it
00:57:53
inevitable that is, do you think that inevitably
00:57:56
all the logic leads to the fact that there will be
00:57:57
a clash somewhere in the Baltic countries
00:57:59
Well, this is the Third World War then I
00:58:02
don’t even have another word then Arzhan,
00:58:05
unfortunately it’s already underway It’s just going
00:58:06
through a series of conflict episodes Yes and
00:58:08
Then it’s possible it will remain a series of such
00:58:10
conflicts of episodes But when I talk about the
00:58:12
collective security system This is
00:58:14
more of a good wish than a practical
00:58:17
proposal because no one is with
00:58:19
infantilism and the fact is that
00:58:20
no one is going to arrange it everyone is
00:58:22
in military rhetoric everyone is ready
00:58:25
Well, we’ll fight well means Well for in
00:58:28
order to fight here,
00:58:31
Unfortunately, words don’t help, actions are needed here.
00:58:34
I just have this feeling. I have the
00:58:36
feeling that
00:58:39
well, we often go to Europe, we see there, in
00:58:42
my opinion, no one is ready to fight and
00:58:44
change this Comfort that exists and and It
00:58:47
seems to me that in any battle, a clash with a
00:58:49
serious
00:58:51
enemy, there will be very big problems,
00:58:54
and very sharply and clearly. Yes, in the
00:58:57
West during this time even anthropology has changed. That
00:58:58
is, they have other people who
00:59:00
no longer think in war and do not want to
00:59:02
fight. These are different ho sapiens Yes, you can
00:59:04
say yes Yes, other anthropos are called
00:59:06
changed, so everyone expects that these
00:59:08
hipsters who love pumpkin armor
00:59:10
will go to war or go to the machine
00:59:12
to produce shells, but it would be very
00:59:14
naive. The West has not been able to restart the
00:59:15
military industry since August, or rather
00:59:17
since the summer.
00:59:19
modern war
00:59:21
shows that the
00:59:23
Western model in Masha is completely broken, it does not work, that is,
00:59:27
small compact professional very
00:59:29
expensive Armed with the latest
00:59:31
technical word The armed forces
00:59:33
end within 3 months of the war,
00:59:34
first they run out of ammunition and everything
00:59:36
else And then a war begins
00:59:38
of which there are huge masses that should be
00:59:41
armed with simple effective
00:59:42
weapons, and this is a fundamental
00:59:44
change in the model, they are not ready for it at all
00:59:47
because first of all they need
00:59:53
the masses even if the states go to war.
00:59:56
They can start to destroy the Russian
00:59:58
military industry. There is just
00:59:59
industry and then a million
01:00:01
men armed with a Mosin rifle will come to
01:00:03
Poland and You won’t fire missiles at them
01:00:06
and you won’t find them for every plane, they
01:00:07
just won’t hit the infantrymen separately, you’ll have to
01:00:09
fight in dirty trenches, that’s
01:00:10
how we fight, shooting at
01:00:13
each other from 5 meters away and throwing grenades. And if in the
01:00:15
west there are hundreds of thousands of people
01:00:17
ready for this to do This is a very big
01:00:19
doubt, a very big doubt, therefore,
01:00:22
and if you look at what is behind Russia is
01:00:24
North Korea China, who has the West labeled
01:00:27
as evil Iran Yes, all all the armies of the state are
01:00:30
capable of first producing huge
01:00:32
quantities of cheap military equipment
01:00:33
that is needed for a conflict of this
01:00:35
scale is needed not expensive not [
01:00:37
music]
01:00:53
super early grief Let's prepare with all our might,
01:00:55
other people say No, what are
01:00:58
we going to agree on, yes, and third people,
01:01:01
but there are no people who say,
01:01:03
maybe let's sit down and
01:01:04
[music] have
01:01:06
developed a new security system
01:01:08
that prevents wars, no
01:01:10
need to threaten anyone Tomahawk, no one needs to be
01:01:11
threatened with infantry, no one needs to be threatened with the
01:01:16
prospect of using nuclear weapons somewhere behind their rows of cores, I
01:01:19
don’t see responsible politicians
01:01:20
who are ready to raise the question of the
01:01:23
collective security system for now,
01:01:25
despite everything, I don’t feel comfortable saying
01:01:27
this phrase, it’s awkward, even as if yes, but
01:01:31
so far about the system of collective security
01:01:33
Sorry, two people are speaking, me and Putin, no one else I
01:01:36
haven’t heard this from anyone else
01:01:38
Putin is talking about peace Yes
01:01:41
indeed Yes yes this is not even peace peace is
01:01:43
not an end in itself peace can be discharged by
01:01:46
another war after a while
01:01:47
frozen conflicts again can
01:01:49
explode, we saw it in Ukraine, we
01:01:51
saw it in Azerbaijan, Armenia We
01:01:52
don’t just need peace, we need a
01:01:55
security system that prevents wars, this is a
01:01:56
slightly different way of posing the question at a
01:01:58
higher level, but so far I don’t see
01:02:01
bunkers that are located on the borders with
01:02:03
Russia, I see attempts there to launch
01:02:05
I see the industry, but I kind of see it from the
01:02:09
other pole Tanya, there won’t be a war, we’ll
01:02:11
agree, but I don’t see a serious
01:02:13
conversation about the security system. That’s what
01:02:15
worries me. This means that
01:02:17
infantilism, which caused what is
01:02:19
happening.
01:02:27
Now, talking with you, I hear more and more often
01:02:32
that borders within the framework of the ninety-first
01:02:35
year are practically
01:02:37
unrealistic, and the people who live in Ukraine
01:02:41
today, who have lost
01:02:43
relatives and friends, how do they react to
01:02:45
such things? Then it turns out All this
01:02:49
was in vain, all the people who died, they
01:02:51
react extremely painful But this is a
01:02:53
natural emotional reaction of people to the
01:02:55
trauma of war, the trauma of war, and
01:02:57
who are confused by the official
01:02:59
Propaganda that we will not reach an inch of our
01:03:02
Earth, and so on and so forth,
01:03:03
again the reason for this is not people, but the reason
01:03:05
that no one is serious with people doesn’t
01:03:07
speak seriously authoritatively the state doesn’t speak
01:03:10
because what do you mean they
01:03:13
spent
01:03:22
the lack of support in vain It was obvious there were 8 years of
01:03:24
war Yeah Now we’ve lost territory we’ve
01:03:27
lost people we’re going to lose even
01:03:29
more territory even more people
01:03:31
uh and we’re paying for what we
01:03:35
’re fighting for, you can say for that
01:03:37
so that Ukraine survives as such, so that
01:03:39
it remains an independent state,
01:03:41
here we are no longer even talking about the former
01:03:43
borders; in fact, it is not clear
01:03:45
that politically we would and will
01:03:47
stand on the need to return the borders of the
01:03:48
first year, but this is the Federal Republic of Germany,
01:03:51
only the Democratic Republic of Germany existed for 41 years after
01:03:53
that, yes, until
01:03:55
global changes,
01:03:58
so no one is going to give up and
01:04:00
give up our territories at
01:04:02
the level of
01:04:04
global political goals, of course we
01:04:07
are talking about the return of all territories, the
01:04:08
return of Crimea, and so on, but this will be
01:04:10
official rhetoric all the way as long as
01:04:11
Ukraine exists.
01:04:15
But now let’s look in reality, people are tired of being
01:04:18
realists, we must be realistic, that
01:04:20
is, the territories will be occupied,
01:04:22
occupied for a very long time. Perhaps
01:04:23
several dozen, as the GDR was once
01:04:25
occupied, and therefore, as part of
01:04:28
Germany, we
01:04:30
must proceed from this, we are fighting so
01:04:33
that we are the first to not be occupied by
01:04:34
the other part so that we remained
01:04:36
independent and could make
01:04:37
their own decisions. But in order for us to
01:04:39
remain independent, we must understand
01:04:41
that the threat to our sovereignty
01:04:42
exists not only from the East but also from the
01:04:44
West, from the West it is not direct, no one in the
01:04:47
sense that Hungarians, Hungarian
01:04:49
radicals or Romanians want to take away from
01:04:51
us part of the territory Although
01:04:53
Iri is not allowed with no brigades, this threat
01:04:55
means that we are totally dependent
01:04:57
on the West, we have no real
01:04:58
sovereignty. It is
01:05:02
formally preserved at the level of respect for the general
01:05:05
principles of sovereignty that
01:05:07
were established back in 1648; this is how the
01:05:10
authority of even small ones is preserved.
01:05:12
I don’t take island states like
01:05:13
Nauru and so on, I’m joking,
01:05:17
which are neither capable of an economy nor, much
01:05:19
less, an Armed Forces, but yes, they are
01:05:21
respected, they shake hands, and,
01:05:23
formally, the same as the leaders of the
01:05:25
largest powers because the country is not
01:05:27
capable of defending itself with real
01:05:29
sovereignty does not
01:05:30
require actions from us that increase our
01:05:32
real sovereignty, this means a
01:05:34
fundamental change in domestic
01:05:35
policy in the direction of increasing the
01:05:38
economy from strengthening it in the direction of
01:05:40
strengthening the military-industrial complex, this is a fundamental
01:05:43
change in relations with neighbors with
01:05:44
whom we need to build this together, the military-industrial complex,
01:05:45
for example, and who understand what the
01:05:47
Russian occupation is The Soviets have
01:05:48
historical experience and are ready to help us in this;
01:05:50
changing relations with
01:05:51
Western countries, not only the West with the countries of the
01:05:53
global south, this is one of the most
01:05:55
important directions for us to build
01:05:56
our own independent policy with China with the
01:05:59
royal ones with the Muslim world with
01:06:02
other countries of the former Soviet
01:06:03
Union with Kazakhstan the same and so
01:06:05
on, it is necessary to stitch together so many
01:06:07
connections that a very large number of
01:06:09
players would be unprofitable for Ukraine to
01:06:11
suffer because, for example, their
01:06:12
investments in Ukraine are a simple example. And
01:06:15
most importantly, we need to change the ideological
01:06:17
frame. Because a society going through
01:06:19
a series of conflicts that we talked about at
01:06:22
the beginning is
01:06:24
what kind of society a complex policy to raise
01:06:25
real sovereignty to strengthen the
01:06:27
economic power of external influence
01:06:30
will not be able to carry out, it is mired in internal
01:06:32
quarrels, therefore, Ukrainians are required to
01:06:35
grow up sharply, take
01:06:37
responsibility sharply and radically sum up the
01:06:39
results, which is already a fixation of
01:06:41
results Yes, stopping the war and
01:06:44
making colossal efforts to
01:06:47
to raise our real sovereignty This is a
01:06:49
task of such magnitude that I
01:06:51
strongly
01:06:52
doubt even
01:06:54
setting it as a goal of our policy
01:06:57
because it still smacks of infantilism. Until
01:07:00
now, the goal is that we will
01:07:01
definitely win the war, we will join the EU and
01:07:04
NATO and there, within this framework, we will begin
01:07:06
to rise and get an umbrella and the roof is
01:07:08
absolutely
01:07:19
[music]
01:07:22
unrealistic and nothing surprises me to the
01:07:25
contrary until the
01:07:28
realistic goals of the task are stated, the
01:07:31
desire is stated to fix
01:07:33
losses
01:07:35
and radically change the internal and external
01:07:39
political course towards strengthening
01:07:40
real sovereignty and then we can
01:07:43
say why Everyone died why
01:07:45
my friends died. For example, I lost in
01:07:47
this war, in this war, in many others
01:07:52
as adults, and Ukraine
01:07:56
has been preserved in history, this is the price that
01:07:59
could have been paid, but it could not have been
01:08:01
paid or paid much less if
01:08:02
we had not been
01:08:05
childish and understood what is really
01:08:07
happening where is all this going? Tell me,
01:08:09
this is how 8 years of war have not
01:08:12
been preparing for war for 8 years, not intensifying, how is this
01:08:17
even possible? It’s difficult to say. It’s not even infantilism. It’s that the
01:08:19
state of war is even
01:08:22
simple.
01:08:27
Ukraine since the ninety-
01:08:28
first year I’m telling you that who
01:08:30
needs us and in the modern world no one is
01:08:32
fighting anymore Although it was great idiocy, it’s
01:08:34
like AIDS and political
01:08:37
destruction of your own immune system
01:08:38
with your own hands, your army, but here it’s still
01:08:41
clear, but when the war started they took away
01:08:43
Crimea And the war in Donbass began. Well,
01:08:44
then it was already possible to figure out where
01:08:46
it was going. Russia was preparing for an attack
01:08:48
on us completely openly from the
01:08:50
year sixteen, it created a
01:08:51
strike force on our eastern and
01:08:53
northern borders and in the Crimea. It’s quite
01:08:55
obvious when I predicted the war in the
01:08:57
twenty-second year, remember in the Dada video
01:08:59
I remember this, but it’s not because I’m a
01:09:00
Great Prophet. But I just, like a military man,
01:09:02
considered what was happening and where
01:09:04
it was all going and the time frame for the group’s readiness, which by
01:09:06
the way was in the open
01:09:07
Print, well, that’s all, how could it
01:09:12
be? Well 8 years of fighting, not preparing for war
01:09:15
and doing everything to make the war take place, as it were, yes, well,
01:09:17
at the same time, yes, keep the rhetoric
01:09:19
nao Keep the
01:09:21
rhetoric high, yes, yes, yes,
01:09:24
high intensity, which
01:09:26
provokes an attack on us,
01:09:28
this, of course,
01:09:30
was the height of infantilism. Well, we have what
01:09:33
we have, but 2 years of the most difficult war with the most difficult
01:09:35
hundreds of thousands of victims They
01:09:38
still do not do not lead to a change in
01:09:40
rhetoric anyway, the policy gives off the
01:09:42
same infantilism, that is, the problem is
01:09:45
that we have not learned the main lesson,
01:09:47
soon the third year of the war will go We have not learned
01:09:49
we do not want to carry out a realistic
01:09:50
secured policy and to carry out a
01:09:52
policy,
01:09:54
our policy allows it. Clear Alexey and in
01:09:56
conclusion, in conclusion, one question
01:09:59
concerns you personally about your
01:10:02
presidential
01:10:03
ambitions. What do you think about this if
01:10:06
elections are held, will you stand as a
01:10:08
candidacy? Is it possible in Ukraine
01:10:12
to stand as a candidate without having you have a
01:10:14
political party, as far as I know, there is no
01:10:15
longer your own Yes, how to work without a
01:10:17
political candidate can be
01:10:19
self-nominated for president, for this it is not
01:10:20
necessary to have a political party, just have a
01:10:22
parliamentary one, it is advisable
01:10:24
to have a party, there is a local one, it is advisable to
01:10:25
have a party I promised that I would run for
01:10:27
president but This means that we will
01:10:29
most likely have to keep this promise. But
01:10:31
this will depend on the conjuncture
01:10:33
that exists in our country. Look, I’m a
01:10:36
skeptic about what, if you
01:10:38
look at the tasks that we
01:10:40
face, then even elections are not a
01:10:46
tool capable of completely solving
01:10:48
this problem because elections do not
01:10:49
guarantee the implementation of adult politics
01:10:52
after this because the infantile,
01:10:55
not only the politics of the infantile
01:10:57
society as a whole, the West is completely
01:10:59
infantile, what can we say about us,
01:11:00
therefore, changing the psychology of mass
01:11:02
society is Elections are such a
01:11:05
tool Yes, it’s kind of a question, so it
01:11:07
seems to me
01:11:10
that Well everything will depend on on the
01:11:12
specific situation from on the context in
01:11:15
which When, how and what will
01:11:17
happen What are the moods in society
01:11:18
Will they be ready for a breakdown, will they be ready, and so on,
01:11:20
I’ll still look because m
01:11:24
Well, I’m just Well, you know, call for a
01:11:27
realistic policy and to nominate yourself as a
01:11:29
candidacy, for example, you don’t have
01:11:31
any chance of success, why is it
01:11:33
repeating the same trick
01:11:35
to carry out the same infantile thing that I
01:11:36
promised to go to the polls? I didn’t
01:11:38
say In what year I’ll go. Maybe I
01:11:39
’ll go to the polls in 20 years, you know?
01:11:41
yes When will it be when society matures,
01:11:43
so I’m not, as it were, a political track
01:11:47
for me remains one of the important ones,
01:11:49
I somehow have my share of power,
01:11:51
if only because I influence minds, for
01:11:54
this you don’t have to be a formal
01:11:55
politician, believe me, I have a sufficient
01:11:58
amount of influence and you just have to
01:12:00
be on the rhetorical side of
01:12:02
positioning, so I wish you success,
01:12:05
happiness, Victory
01:12:07
and, as it were, real sovereignty of history
01:12:10
for your country, for your people,
01:12:15
there are all sorts of different tools for this. As for politics, these are very
01:12:16
specific things that need to be looked at
01:12:18
depending on the current political contours
01:12:20
at that time, my friend for many years
01:12:25
will win the elections, the clear
01:12:27
question is whether I should be nominated as
01:12:28
president. Why is it obvious that 3% of the votes
01:12:32
and so on, and then it is much easier for me to
01:12:34
enter into an alliance with him and then
01:12:35
resolve some of my issues in a
01:12:37
situational political union
01:12:39
human and so on etc. If yes, we don’t
01:12:41
split society and don’t delay
01:12:43
votes, so we will look at Where and
01:12:46
how it will develop for a politician -
01:12:48
this is a tool for me, she is not an
01:12:50
end in itself, she cannot be an
01:12:51
end in itself for one healthy person who
01:12:53
wants success in his country, she
01:12:56
is a tool used
01:12:58
specifically in specific conditions if
01:13:01
the conditions develop Yes, you need to
01:13:02
do this if they develop there are completely
01:13:04
other ways to help your country
01:13:07
without politics Clear Thank you very much
01:13:10
Alexey we will be in touch as
01:13:13
usual I hope to see you again in March
01:13:17
I had a very busy
01:13:19
period I had to take a break I spent
01:13:21
almost less than x days, no more than 3
01:13:23
days, not a day I was in one place,
01:13:25
endless flights and time
01:13:26
zone changes Well, we are back again And I am
01:13:28
very glad that we are back I am grateful
01:13:31
Thank you very much I want to tell you and
01:13:32
your team for the opportunity to host
01:13:34
such a broadcast Thank you, good luck See you
01:13:38
Alexey Thank you very much Well, all I
01:13:39
can do is say goodbye to our
01:13:41
viewers Until we meet again, you watched
01:13:42
the episode of Live broadcasts with Alexey
01:13:44
Arrestovich all the best

Description:

🪖 Президентська бригада збирає на авто для підрозділу, Mavic T, глушилки, станцію та на купівлю гуми для машини. 🎯 Ціль: 370 000.00 ₴ 🔗 Посилання на банку: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6o9L5MSHqL 💳 Номер картки банки: 5375 4112 1270 3164 ➖➖➖➖➖ В интервью Арманжана Байтасова обсудили положение на фронте, политику и перспективы Украины и Запада: ➤ 00:00 Обстановка на фронте: Купянск, Бахмут, Работино, Авдеевка. В украинской армии катастрофическая нехватка снарядов. Война дронов. ➤ 04:54 Оборона Авдеевки — отвод украинских войск начался. Российская армия движется на Покровск. ➤ 07:58 Общий замысел врага — захватить Донецкую, Луганскую, Запорожскую и Херсонскую области. ➤ 10:15 Конфликт между Залужным и Зеленским. Мобилизация в Украине: цена, стоимость. Политическая стратегия Украины не соответствует реальной обстановке. ➤ 17:48 Главком ВСУ Сырский и его стиль командования. Удачные военные операции и потери. Политический рейтинг. ➤ 22:14 Потеря единства украинского общества. ➤ 24:53 Стратегия Зеленского не совпадает со стратегией Запада, делает невозможным диалог и приводит к снижению военной помощи. ➤ 26:05 Военная помощь от США. Перспективы обрушения фронта. Информационная политика украинской власти. ➤ 29:03 Легитимность Верховной рады и президента Украины — дополнительные дестабилизирующие факторы после 31 марта. ➤ 31:34 Необходимость выборов в Украине. Кандидатура Залужного в качестве президента страны. ➤ 33:17 Зачем нужна власть Зеленскому? Стратегия войны. ➤ 36:44 Предположил сценарий развития событий, когда украинцы готовы к мирным переговорам в условиях мобилизации. ➤ 40:05 Положение дел в России на фоне войны. Два возможных сценария Путина. ➤ 44:20 Президент Украины может пойти на мирные переговоры по Формуле мира, цель которых — создание новой системы безопасности в Европе и мире. ➤ 48:42 Россия хочет переговоров, но ее никто не приглашает. ➤ 49:20 Обеспечение воюющих сторон во время войны. Стратегия войны Путина — в мировом противодействии Западу. ➤ 51:40 Проблема Украины — мы заявили и реализовывали цели, на которые не имеем ресурса. Высокая цена инфантильной политики Украины. ➤ 55:13 Лицемерная и инфантильная политика Запада после 1991 года: во время мирных переговоров военная помощь Украине не предоставлялась. При каких условиях может быть гарантирован мир. ➤ 57:45 Неприятная перспектива Запада: считаю неизбежным столкновение России и Европы. Неготовность нового типа людей в Европе воевать. ➤ 01:01:24 Отсутствие ответственных политиков: о коллективной системе безопасности говорят только Арестович и Путин. ➤ 01:02:25 Реакция украинцев на нереальность достижения границ 1991 года в текущем положении. ➤ 01:04:17 Реальность нахождения в оккупации части территорий Украины в течение многих лет. За что воюет Украина. Угроза суверенитету страны с Востока и Запада. ➤ 01:05:30 Возможные цели политики Украины: действия, которые необходимы для повышения реального суверенитета. ➤ 01:07:19 Пессимизм в перспективах Украины — главный урок страна пока не выучила. Высокая цена, чтобы стать самостоятельной, взрослой, и сохраниться в истории. ➤ 01:09:56 Президентские амбиции Арестовича и неполитические пути помощи стране. 🔔 Подписывайтесь на каналы: 🔸 Арестович: https://www.youtube.com/@arestovych?sub_confirmation=1 🔸 Арманжан Байтасов: https://www.youtube.com/@baitassov_live 🇬🇧 Эфиры Алексея Арестовича на английском: @privateerstation ☕️ Вы можете выразить благодарность лично Алексею и оставить отзыв, который он прочитает: https://secure.wayforpay.com/donate/arestovych 🎓 Школа мышления и коммуникации @ApeironSchool ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ► https://apeiron.school/ ► https://t.me/apeiron_school ► https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser 👕 Мерч: https://shop.apeiron.school/ 👩‍🚀 24.02 Киносеминар "Марсианин" https://apeiron.school/martian 🌇 27.02 Курс "Мифодизайн" В.Зеленина https://apeiron.school/mythodesign 📖 02.03 Разбор книги "Первые люди на Луне" с А.Арестовичем https://apeiron.school/first-men-in-the-moon 🔖 СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ СЕТИ @arestovych ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📍Все официальные ресурсы Алексея Арестовича: https://lnk.bio/alexey.arestovich ► Telegram-канал: https://t.me/O_Arestovich_official ► Instagram: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser ► Twitter: https://twitter.com/arestovych ► TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@alexey.arestovich

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
0
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players