Download "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу"

Please wait. We're preparing links for easy ad-free video watching and downloading.

Previous video: У полицейских прав стало больше! / Как расширят полномочия полиции?Next video: Кодекс мафии: Взгляд изнутри - документальный сериал 2 серия

Кодекс мафии: Взгляд изнутри - документальный сериал 2 серия

Кодекс мафии: Взгляд изнутри - документальный сериал 2 серия

Channel: Загадки криминального мира

У полицейских прав стало больше! / Как расширят полномочия полиции?

У полицейских прав стало больше! / Как расширят полномочия полиции?

Channel: Корнев и Партнёры

КАК СНЯТЬ АРЕСТ С БАНКОВСКИХ КАРТ И СЧЕТОВ?

КАК СНЯТЬ АРЕСТ С БАНКОВСКИХ КАРТ И СЧЕТОВ?

Channel: Сергей Турков

СЕМЕЙНИКИ В ТЮРЬМЕ

СЕМЕЙНИКИ В ТЮРЬМЕ

Channel: Мишевый Плюшка

адвокат по уголовным делам

адвокат

юрист

что делает адвокат

как работает адвокат

адвокат с клиентом

адвокат Олешко

адвокат Данила Олешко

данила олешко

адвокат в спб

адвокат на допросе

ходатайства и жалобы

обжалование приговора

обжалование действия

адвокат допрос

адвокат следователь

предварительное следствие

обыск

дача объяснений

полиция

ск

суд

как зарабатывает адвокат

уголовное дело

хороший адвокат

лучший

защита

что делает адвокат в суде

очная ставка

00:00:00

how a lawyer works in a criminal case, what

00:00:02

his work consists of, what

00:00:05

he gets paid for, we will analyze the whole path

00:00:08

from the first meeting and to the Supreme Court,

00:00:11

let's go

00:00:12

[music]

00:00:16

first appeal

00:00:18

call message letter so the client

00:00:23

outlines the problem the

00:00:25

lawyer must understand from the information received is

00:00:28

competent does he specialize in this matter, does

00:00:30

he specialize in the required

00:00:32

area of law, do you need to postpone the meeting

00:00:35

or is it better to immediately redirect the person to

00:00:37

another specialist?

00:00:39

It happens that the person calls

00:00:42

not at all on a legal issue and you

00:00:44

just need to tell him where it is better to contact

00:00:47

if the lawyer understands that the person

00:00:50

needs legal help and the lawyer

00:00:52

understands this issue, then a

00:00:55

meeting is scheduled, the first meeting is an

00:00:58

exact consultation, of course, it happens and so there is

00:01:01

no opportunity to visit the lawyer

00:01:03

in person, then you will have to talk remotely,

00:01:05

this is not very convenient and there is not always

00:01:07

confidence in the confidentiality of the conversation, my

00:01:11

personal belief is that in a criminal case, a

00:01:13

personal meeting is the best option,

00:01:15

including for the client, since it is still

00:01:18

necessary to get to

00:01:19

know each other to understand the comfort, I

00:01:23

will work together for you; an initial

00:01:25

consultation by telephone or video mode

00:01:27

is suitable only if face-to-face meetings are

00:01:29

completely impossible; a subsequent

00:01:32

consultation after the first acquaintance

00:01:33

can already be carried out remotely, also in the

00:01:37

case when a person is in an

00:01:38

isolation ward and his interests two cats

00:01:41

came from relatives or close people; relatives do not

00:01:43

always

00:01:45

have full information about what happened

00:01:48

and what the circumstances of the case are, so in the

00:01:51

future, if a

00:01:53

blockade agreement is concluded, be sure to visit the

00:01:55

principal who is in the season; by the way,

00:01:58

all conversations with a lawyer, correspondence, even the

00:02:00

very fact of the appeal for help are protected

00:02:03

from Akkadian secrecy, the lawyer has

00:02:06

no right to disclose this information to anyone without your consent;

00:02:08

it is possible that your question

00:02:11

will require additional time

00:02:12

to study the documents and

00:02:15

one or more meetings will be required before the

00:02:17

lawyer enters into the matter of concluding an

00:02:19

agreement if you have discussed all the details, you are

00:02:22

satisfied with everything and the lawyer ready

00:02:24

to get to work, then

00:02:26

an agreement is concluded, this is a contract for the provision of

00:02:29

legal assistance between the client, the

00:02:31

principal and the lawyer, it

00:02:34

indicates all the basic information

00:02:36

what work on what case the lawyer

00:02:38

will perform, payment procedure, and so

00:02:40

on, the agreement is also protected by

00:02:42

attorney-client privilege, no one has the right to

00:02:44

require you to provide or

00:02:46

shows the agreement the payment

00:02:49

is officially paid to the cash desk from the Lak

00:02:50

education, immediately answering the question about

00:02:53

installments of hourly daily or

00:02:56

monthly payment, I will say that the most

00:02:58

common method of payment in a

00:03:00

criminal case is one hundred percent payment

00:03:03

before the start of work and this is not a matter of

00:03:06

greed and showers of great lq simply

00:03:08

so, according to the law, there are fewer problems; fees in a

00:03:11

criminal case cannot be paid, as they

00:03:13

say, according to the result; this is prohibited by

00:03:15

law;

00:03:16

hourly payment will be difficult to verify; the

00:03:19

client will always get the

00:03:22

impression that the lawyer deliberately

00:03:25

works long hours; monthly payment can also

00:03:28

lead to misunderstanding; for example, a

00:03:29

lawyer may work from dawn for the first two weeks

00:03:32

until sunset,

00:03:33

and another month may pass without a

00:03:36

single tear from the action itself, and in

00:03:39

the future, the client may also

00:03:40

get the impression that the case is being

00:03:42

dragged out for an unacceptably long time and

00:03:45

will rush the lawyer,

00:03:48

while quite often in criminal cases it

00:03:50

happens that time works in his own

00:03:52

interests but nevertheless, both hourly and

00:03:55

daily not monthly payments are quite

00:03:58

often found in practice, and that is,

00:04:00

often the client has a question about the

00:04:02

guarantees when defending a case: there are

00:04:05

no guarantees and there cannot be any; moreover, the

00:04:07

lawyer is directly prohibited from guaranteeing

00:04:09

any results; here arises the

00:04:12

next question is why pay a lawyer

00:04:15

money if there is no confidence that the

00:04:17

desired result will occur; it really

00:04:19

may not happen; here you need to understand

00:04:21

the following: the lawyer does not make court

00:04:25

decisions; he is not able to take and make a

00:04:27

decision on the release of a person;

00:04:29

it can happen that he did everything as

00:04:32

much as possible for his

00:04:33

client but this never improved his

00:04:36

situation, but at the same time, it can and

00:04:39

will work out even in the most hopeless at

00:04:42

first glance situations,

00:04:44

stunning victories happen, this cannot be

00:04:47

predicted in advance, I would compare

00:04:49

advocacy with medicine, you

00:04:51

can take all possible methods of

00:04:54

treatment, give the most effective medicine,

00:04:57

but this can help patients, or can you

00:05:01

help, is it really necessary to refuse treatment on this basis,

00:05:04

and in defense

00:05:07

in a criminal case, the

00:05:08

arguments of the lawyer who presents the

00:05:11

court to the prosecutor, the investigator, can

00:05:13

be heard, or can be

00:05:15

ignored;

00:05:20

you need to decide

00:05:22

whether you are ready to just take it and

00:05:25

do nothing or whether you still need to use

00:05:27

every chance to protect yourself, and so

00:05:30

a meeting took place with the lawyer, he listened to you,

00:05:32

understood the essence of the problem, roughly

00:05:34

outlined the plan for the upcoming work and you

00:05:37

entered into an agreement,

00:05:38

then the lawyer enters into the matter of

00:05:41

dependence depending on the stage at which the

00:05:43

lawyer’s case is, there will be a different

00:05:45

amount of work. Basically, we identify

00:05:47

two stages for ourselves: this is the preliminary

00:05:49

investigation and the court, we also conduct verification, which

00:05:53

can be carried out before the initiation of a

00:05:55

criminal case;

00:06:03

interrogation as a

00:06:05

witness, also when resolving the issue

00:06:07

of choosing a preventive measure, and so on,

00:06:09

it may be necessary to appeal against the actions of

00:06:12

officials or court decisions, and

00:06:14

much more, let's take it in order, the very

00:06:17

first and most important thing that a lawyer does when

00:06:20

entering into a case is to familiarize himself with the

00:06:22

maximum number of materials available on the

00:06:24

case why exactly accessible

00:06:28

because punish by the way the criminal

00:06:30

process the lawyer has access to

00:06:32

different volumes of material at the

00:06:35

verification stage took practically nothing to

00:06:37

see after the initiation of the criminal case

00:06:39

until the end of its investigation a little

00:06:42

more the lawyer has the right to get acquainted with the

00:06:45

arrest report with the decision on the

00:06:48

application of a preventive measure

00:06:49

investigative reports actions

00:06:52

that were carried out with the participation of

00:06:54

warming up him and the accused with other

00:06:56

documents that were presented or

00:06:59

should have been presented to him, but the same

00:07:02

protocols of interrogation of witnesses cannot be seen

00:07:04

according to the law; a

00:07:07

lawyer can learn the entire criminal case only after the

00:07:10

end of the preliminary investigation in

00:07:12

accordance with Article 217, while in general only

00:07:15

after After studying the materials, an

00:07:17

objective picture will become known because

00:07:20

in the vast majority of cases people

00:07:22

have an erroneous or incomplete

00:07:24

idea of what is happening in the case

00:07:27

or, due to the lack of necessary

00:07:29

education and experience, they are unable to correctly

00:07:31

convey all kinds of advice from a lawyer, for

00:07:34

example, the parents of a guy come to Kata

00:07:36

and say that their son was detained

00:07:39

for some kind of computer crime and

00:07:42

it seemed like there was nothing wrong, but upon

00:07:44

gaining access to the materials and

00:07:46

studying the first official

00:07:48

document, it becomes clear that he is

00:07:50

accused of selling prohibited substances on an

00:07:53

especially large scale, where punishment

00:07:55

up to life imprisonment was

00:07:57

simply carried out using a

00:07:59

computer in on the Internet,

00:08:02

the difference is more than significant,

00:08:04

but the parents made the conclusion about a computer crime

00:08:07

because during the search of

00:08:09

the home, only a computer was confiscated and

00:08:12

the information was not conveyed to them,

00:08:14

maybe somewhere under the influence of stress

00:08:16

they heard something wrong, they misunderstood

00:08:18

and there were no documents received in general,

00:08:22

as they say in the movies, information is the

00:08:24

most valuable resource; participation at the

00:08:27

verification stage, as a rule, before initiating a

00:08:29

criminal case, an inspection is carried out in

00:08:32

accordance with Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;

00:08:34

the most common action that a

00:08:36

lawyer has to work with is this

00:08:39

giving by the client an explanation, many do not

00:08:42

know, unlike interrogation, giving

00:08:44

an explanation

00:08:46

they cannot bind this voluntary action with a summons, but here you need to

00:08:49

assess whether it is worth ignoring the summons or

00:08:51

whether you need to prepare and give evidence

00:08:53

and at the same time what is called going for

00:08:55

reconnaissance,

00:08:56

try to find out as much

00:08:58

information as possible, even from the very posing of the

00:09:00

questions you can find out what claims are made against you

00:09:02

and what information they have

00:09:05

people asking a question, the tasks of the lawyer

00:09:08

before the Riyad begins to testify,

00:09:10

point out the weak points of his position,

00:09:13

clarify the most significant details,

00:09:15

work out the maximum number of

00:09:17

sharp corners and uncomfortable questions, it is very

00:09:20

important during this period for the person not to be left

00:09:22

alone, since based on the results of his

00:09:24

explanation, all questions may disappear and a decision is

00:09:27

made a decision to refuse to

00:09:28

initiate a case, and vice versa, a

00:09:31

criminal case can be initiated, and so it

00:09:34

can happen instantly during a

00:09:36

criminal case and a person can be

00:09:38

detained; in order to correctly assess the

00:09:41

current situation, you need the help of a

00:09:44

professional lawyer who

00:09:46

acts specifically in your interests and who

00:09:49

will help you make a decision what give

00:09:51

evidence, to what extent is it better to give it and is it

00:09:54

worth giving it at all? After all, it is not a rare

00:09:56

case when a person, finding himself in such a

00:09:58

stressful situation without support,

00:10:00

begins to say things that he

00:10:03

would never say in a state

00:10:05

of calm, or information is only given out that is unfavorable to him,

00:10:08

which has not been given to anyone before it was

00:10:10

known and in the future this will bring

00:10:13

many problems and also under

00:10:15

stress, the person always gives me

00:10:17

reliable testimony, if according to the

00:10:19

results of the check,

00:10:21

signs of a crime are found, then a

00:10:23

criminal case will be opened, such a

00:10:25

stage of the criminal process as a

00:10:27

preliminary investigation

00:10:29

or inquiry will begin, if a brief inquiry is

00:10:32

carried out in most cases of

00:10:33

minor gravity and a preliminary

00:10:36

investigation of moderate gravity, serious and

00:10:38

especially serious crimes

00:10:40

than a lawyer will need to work

00:10:43

during the investigation of a criminal case,

00:10:45

as we said, familiarization with

00:10:48

materials over the course of a day, then discussion with a

00:10:52

trustee of options for the development of events

00:10:54

when choosing a particular position,

00:10:56

approval of a plan of tactics and

00:10:59

defense strategy period conducting a

00:11:00

preliminary investigation, probably the

00:11:02

most important thing a lawyer works with is

00:11:05

interrogation,

00:11:06

strictly speaking, the explanation that we

00:11:08

said earlier is not evidence in a

00:11:10

criminal case, but only one of the reasons

00:11:13

for initiating it, but interrogation is

00:11:16

evidence, and one of the most

00:11:18

important evidence shown during interrogation

00:11:21

should be clearly verified and not contain

00:11:23

unnecessary information, also before

00:11:26

the client testifies, the lawyer must

00:11:27

point out the weak points of the opposition,

00:11:30

work out uncomfortable questions on the island and we are

00:11:32

not talking about a deliberate distortion of

00:11:35

the truth, no, you need to understand that the

00:11:39

same event can be presented and recorded in

00:11:42

completely different ways and not to

00:11:44

take seriously how

00:11:46

your readings will be recorded; the protocol is a big

00:11:48

mistake,

00:11:50

as well as constantly changing the readings, the

00:11:53

same mistake

00:11:54

can be supplemented and clarified an

00:11:56

infinite number of times, but I do

00:11:58

n’t recommend changing the score; as a rule, it does

00:12:01

not bring a positive result;

00:12:04

the version will be accepted as the basis which

00:12:06

confirms the guilt of the suspect and

00:12:08

everything that justifies him, if

00:12:11

he previously admitted guilt, will be

00:12:14

regarded critically, in principle,

00:12:16

the most important tool for protecting the

00:12:17

suspect or his is his testimony,

00:12:21

everything else is secondary, therefore, the interrogation

00:12:24

must be treated very responsibly if there is a

00:12:27

lack of information about what

00:12:29

evidence is best to give very

00:12:32

brief testimony or not to give it at all

00:12:34

until clarity appears,

00:12:37

confrontation is a form of interrogation when

00:12:39

two persons are interrogated at once, for example,

00:12:41

suspects, a witness, then different

00:12:44

testimonies that contradict each

00:12:46

other, in order to eliminate these

00:12:48

contradictions, the interrogation is invited and the

00:12:50

witness and at the same time the suspect,

00:12:52

each of them states his version of

00:12:54

events, then the investigator asks

00:12:57

clarifying questions, then the participants in the

00:13:00

confrontation have the right to ask another question,

00:13:02

as well as a lawyer, the task of the lawyer is to

00:13:05

prepare confidentially for the confrontation,

00:13:07

calculate what questions can be

00:13:09

asked, draw up a list of questions

00:13:12

and try to ask them in such a form

00:13:14

that the investigator does not ask them dismissed and the

00:13:17

investigator has the right to withdraw the question,

00:13:19

but at the same time he is still obliged to have his

00:13:21

protocol. In some cases, the lawyer himself

00:13:23

can initiate a confrontation if

00:13:26

this is required by defense tactics. Also, the

00:13:29

primary question that arises

00:13:31

immediately after the initiation of a criminal

00:13:32

case is the question of a preventive measure,

00:13:36

the investigator makes a decision. whether the

00:13:38

suspect is on recognizance not to leave the place

00:13:40

or whether it is necessary to detain him their

00:13:43

annotation before the court of my detention

00:13:44

in custody

00:13:46

choosing a preventive measure is a separate

00:13:48

extensive topic that has already been

00:13:49

discussed in one of the previous videos

00:13:51

if briefly the recognizance not to leave

00:13:54

is chosen by the investigator, but house

00:13:56

arrest and detention is collected

00:13:59

court at the request of the investigator the

00:14:01

justification for taking a person into

00:14:03

custody includes many factors

00:14:05

whether he can hide or continue to

00:14:07

engage in criminal activity

00:14:10

has been convicted before if he has a permanent

00:14:13

place of residence primarily influence

00:14:16

the severity of the crime for serious and especially

00:14:18

serious it is most likely that the investigator

00:14:22

will go to court with by petition,

00:14:23

taking into custody, the task of the lawyer in

00:14:26

court is to prove that the client can

00:14:30

choose a more lenient measure of restraint,

00:14:32

it is necessary to analyze what

00:14:34

evidence confirms the fact of the

00:14:36

commission of a crime and to exclude from the

00:14:38

crime, it is necessary to check

00:14:40

whether procedural

00:14:42

violations have been committed, including

00:14:43

during the arrest, to

00:14:44

provide characterizing material,

00:14:46

information about the presence of children at work,

00:14:49

place of residence if he is not

00:14:51

registered in the city where

00:14:54

the investigation is underway and he does not have housing, then you must

00:14:57

try to find someone who could

00:14:58

provide the same space; you will not

00:15:00

receive such a person’s notarized

00:15:03

consent for the principal to live there,

00:15:05

or interrogate the owner himself in

00:15:08

court as a witness if

00:15:11

the court’s decision is not satisfied the principal, then it needs to be

00:15:13

appealed to a higher order, pointing out

00:15:16

to the higher-ups in Sudan the violations that

00:15:18

were committed already when

00:15:20

the decision was made;

00:15:21

participation in searches is also a fairly

00:15:24

broad field of activity for a lawyer;

00:15:26

here the biggest question is to find out that a

00:15:29

vacation is taking place and to arrive in

00:15:31

time for it, and also to get into the premises we are searching,

00:15:34

because according to the law a search can be

00:15:36

carried out without the participation of a defense lawyer,

00:15:39

say in this procedural action there

00:15:41

can be quite a lot; in short,

00:15:43

the task of the lawyer is to check the legality of its

00:15:46

conduct, in principle, for example, for an Omsk

00:15:49

office you only need an order from

00:15:51

the investigator, and water searches of a residential

00:15:53

premises require a court order to

00:15:56

understand in general about it, but because

00:15:59

it there may not be a search such an

00:16:01

operational-search activity as an

00:16:03

inspection of the premises of buildings and

00:16:05

structures, this is of great importance

00:16:08

since these different actions of the streets have

00:16:11

completely different powers, but also the

00:16:14

task of the lawyer includes, name the

00:16:16

procedural violations committed,

00:16:17

prevent the uncontrolled movement of

00:16:19

persons around the premises, distinguish between a search of

00:16:22

the premises and a personal search,

00:16:24

control so that all seized

00:16:27

items and documents are recorded in the

00:16:29

protocol, obtain all the necessary

00:16:32

documents and, if necessary,

00:16:34

appeal the search itself, you

00:16:36

can also appeal the actions that

00:16:39

could have occurred in violation of the

00:16:40

legislation of the examination

00:16:42

and there are a huge variety of both the

00:16:45

common route of logical

00:16:48

forensic auto technical

00:16:50

accounting examinations and

00:16:52

exotic dendrochronology, humanities or

00:16:55

100 humanities in all areas of

00:16:58

special knowledge, a lawyer, of course,

00:17:01

cannot succeed, and in some complex

00:17:03

examinations it is necessary to involve

00:17:05

specialists because very

00:17:08

simple things are often written in a very complex

00:17:11

language, but quite often

00:17:13

different experts may have different opinions on the same issue

00:17:16

opposite opinion,

00:17:17

sometimes a Chisora lawyer has to

00:17:20

read multi-page

00:17:22

expert opinions and try to understand at least a little the

00:17:24

essence of what is written;

00:17:26

how an expert makes a conclusion;

00:17:29

the investigator draws up a list of questions

00:17:31

that need to be answered and

00:17:33

provides the necessary materials and the

00:17:35

case; the main task of the defense attorney is, if

00:17:38

necessary, to put his questions

00:17:40

to the expert to study the conclusions,

00:17:42

the possibility of involving a specialist,

00:17:45

to identify violations that are sometimes

00:17:47

allowed during the examination,

00:17:48

and if this is necessary, file a justified

00:17:52

petition for an

00:17:53

additional or repeated examination,

00:17:55

since we have already started talking and filing petitions, we will

00:17:57

analyze this topic, in fact,

00:18:00

filing petitions is the main way of

00:18:02

procedural communication with the investigator

00:18:05

or by the court, if

00:18:07

the petition is quite simple, it is a request to perform this

00:18:10

or that action; the

00:18:12

defense attorney can petition for many things;

00:18:14

she asks certain persons to appoint

00:18:17

an examination to carry out investigative

00:18:19

actions to obtain evidence and

00:18:21

many other things; the

00:18:23

investigators consider the petition

00:18:25

and make one of the following decisions

00:18:27

to grant the petition refuse

00:18:30

satisfaction or partially punish

00:18:33

if the result of the review is

00:18:35

to build a defense, then the

00:18:37

investigator’s decision must be appealed and we have smoothly

00:18:40

approached the appeal of the actions or

00:18:43

inactions of the investigator in case of

00:18:45

disagreement with the decisions made

00:18:47

with responses to the petition, if

00:18:48

any violations are identified, there is the right to file a

00:18:51

complaint in accordance with the article of the courts 4 for now,

00:18:54

really the boss or the prosecutor’s office

00:18:57

and in accordance with Article 125, for now the court, the

00:19:00

procedure for writing complaints is a rather

00:19:02

voluminous topic, you need to competently and concisely,

00:19:05

the main thing is to be able to point out violations in a timely manner,

00:19:07

and of course, to be able to

00:19:10

identify them and record

00:19:12

timeliness is also an important factor

00:19:14

and the point is not even in order not to be late, and more

00:19:16

often, on the contrary, not to rush

00:19:19

to lay all the cards on the table, you need to

00:19:21

understand where and how best to appeal this

00:19:23

or that action, but also to maintain the

00:19:26

chain of command, complaints should not be submitted

00:19:28

immediately to the highest offices, where they

00:19:31

will not be considered, but will be redirected to the

00:19:33

unit that is responsible for its

00:19:35

consideration, but only now

00:19:38

there is additional time for forwarding; the

00:19:39

actions are appealed step by step in the order of

00:19:42

subordination, first at the district level,

00:19:44

then at the city level; the subject was given at the federal

00:19:47

level; bypassing this order will not work; it will not be possible to

00:19:50

simply qualify the crime in general;

00:19:53

this issue can be raised at any

00:19:55

stage of criminal proceedings, both

00:19:57

during the preliminary investigation and

00:19:59

and in court, the essence of this issue is

00:20:01

that the actions of the suspect

00:20:03

or accused do not always receive the correct

00:20:06

legal assessment,

00:20:07

often a more serious

00:20:10

crime is charged, let’s not complicate things too much

00:20:12

and give an example from textbooks between

00:20:16

two people in love there was a fight as a result of

00:20:18

which a person fell and dropped the phone

00:20:20

after a fight 2 people unnoticed picked up

00:20:23

the phone and left, he was caught and accused of

00:20:26

robbery with violence, yes, he is

00:20:29

guilty, but not of robbery, but of two other

00:20:31

but less serious acts, the reason is not

00:20:34

beatings and theft, theft is the secret theft of

00:20:36

someone else's property,

00:20:38

but robbery and rate and that committing robbery

00:20:41

with violence the attacker immediately

00:20:43

has the intent to openly take possession of

00:20:45

the property through the use of force; here it is

00:20:48

necessary to conduct additional

00:20:50

interrogations and confrontations and prove that the

00:20:52

attacker first had the intent only

00:20:55

to inflict beatings,

00:20:56

and then when he saw the phone,

00:20:59

the intent to secretly steal was born, provided

00:21:02

that the victims and other persons did not notice

00:21:04

the moment stealing a phone, this will be a

00:21:07

separate intent for beatings and a separate

00:21:10

intent for theft, the punishment for this is much

00:21:12

softer than for robbery with

00:21:15

violence, and this is called

00:21:16

retraining after the

00:21:18

investigator decides that comprehensive evidence has been collected in the case,

00:21:20

he

00:21:22

notifies the accused and his defense attorney

00:21:24

about the end of the investigative actions and

00:21:26

provides the opportunity to familiarize yourself

00:21:28

with all the materials of the criminal case;

00:21:31

this is also a very significant period for

00:21:33

the work of a lawyer, since

00:21:35

those documents that were previously not

00:21:37

visible become available, but the criminal case also needs to be

00:21:40

able to read and find errors that

00:21:42

could help in the implementation of the defense;

00:21:44

one volume is about 250 houses are

00:21:48

usually several 2 3 of these dozens

00:21:51

there are even hundreds; familiarizing yourself with the

00:21:53

materials of a criminal case takes

00:21:54

a lot of time; as correctly, a lawyer

00:21:57

makes photocopies of the materials and reads

00:22:00

them in a calm atmosphere, so

00:22:02

he has no

00:22:04

time limits and can

00:22:06

return repeatedly already earlier After reading

00:22:08

the materials, based on the results of familiarization with the

00:22:11

case, the lawyer can file a petition and

00:22:13

declare violations committed, the

00:22:16

ropes can be raised to carry out some

00:22:18

additional investigative actions,

00:22:20

then the case is sent to the prosecutor to

00:22:22

approve the indictment and

00:22:24

send the case to court if they ask

00:22:27

the devil that as a result of it was carried out incompletely and

00:22:29

there are any - other obstacles to

00:22:31

the right of the case to the court, then it transfers the case

00:22:33

back with certain instructions to

00:22:36

eliminate shortcomings. The

00:22:39

defense lawyer can also declare these shortcomings in his petition based on the

00:22:41

results of familiarization with the

00:22:43

case materials or by sending an appeal

00:22:46

directly to the prosecutor, if

00:22:47

the prosecutor decides that he did everything in in order

00:22:49

then they gave him send him to court in general

00:22:52

terms these are the main types of work of a lawyer

00:22:54

at the pre-trial stage I’m sure I

00:22:57

missed something somewhere I didn’t talk about everything but

00:22:59

in my opinion this is the most basic and

00:23:02

the most successful outcome in the process of protecting

00:23:05

the client is if to the lawyer before transferring the

00:23:07

case it is possible to prove in court that there is no

00:23:10

element or event of a crime, or

00:23:12

the principal is not involved in the commission of the crime,

00:23:14

which leads to the termination of

00:23:16

the criminal case. work as a judge also

00:23:19

represents a separate huge

00:23:21

layer of lawyering. Surely

00:23:24

many have heard that in Russia there are

00:23:26

less than one

00:23:28

percent of acquittals, yes this is true

00:23:31

acquittals in our judicial system are

00:23:33

very rare for any lawyer,

00:23:36

receiving an acquittal is a

00:23:38

great success and a significant event, but

00:23:41

the statistics of acquittals did not

00:23:43

include cases that were returned

00:23:45

to the prosecutor and were never returned to court; cases

00:23:48

where there was a reclassification to a less

00:23:50

serious crime; cases where

00:23:53

many crimes were charged and in the end, they were all

00:23:56

eliminated and the verdict was pronounced

00:23:58

in only one case, which were terminated due to the reconciliation of the

00:24:00

parties with active

00:24:03

repentance with the imposition of a court

00:24:05

fine and much more in the

00:24:08

judicial process, the lawyer has the right to

00:24:10

file petitions to examine the

00:24:14

evidence available in the criminal case, to interrogate witnesses,

00:24:17

to invite his witnesses to

00:24:19

provide own evidence,

00:24:21

there are many pitfalls

00:24:24

and features that become

00:24:27

known only with experience; an

00:24:30

elementary example: when

00:24:31

questioning witnesses in court, a lawyer

00:24:35

cannot refer to evidence

00:24:37

that has not been examined by the judge immediately,

00:24:39

such actions will be stopped; in this case, it is

00:24:42

necessary to request an

00:24:44

investigation of this evidence and only

00:24:46

then can you refer to it without having experience in

00:24:48

participating in court hearings, it

00:24:51

will be difficult to understand when it is better to make this or

00:24:53

that motion, what questions

00:24:55

can be asked of a witness, the court will also allow

00:24:58

participation in trials with jurors,

00:25:01

in general, a whole science in court, a lawyer must

00:25:04

be able to competently and concisely apply before the trial the

00:25:07

position of his client in terms of

00:25:09

time, depending on the complexity and

00:25:11

volume of the case, the position of the client, the court can

00:25:14

last from one day to several years; the

00:25:17

next stage is an appeal

00:25:19

against the verdict; if the verdict does not suit

00:25:22

the client, then he is referred to

00:25:24

the higher courts as a lawyer, which also requires the

00:25:27

defender to have certain skills and

00:25:29

the ability to analyze case, find a

00:25:31

violation, point them out to a higher

00:25:34

court, you are up to the Supreme Court, and also know the

00:25:37

rules for conducting a criminal trial

00:25:39

pike perch of higher authorities because

00:25:42

they all differ significantly from each

00:25:44

other, in general, a lot can still be said about

00:25:46

what kind of work a lawyer can do

00:25:49

in a criminal case, but I think that it’s time to

00:25:51

finish the most basic one I have listed

00:25:53

at any of these stages a lawyer can

00:25:55

enter into a criminal case study

00:25:57

the materials and get to work

00:25:59

use the help of professionals if

00:26:02

the video was useful please like and

00:26:03

subscribe bye

Description:

https://www.advokatoleshko.ru/ Что делает адвокат по уголовному делу. Из чего складывается его работа? За что он получает деньги? Разберем весь путь от первого обращения до верховного суда на примере типичного уголовного дела. Основные этапы и виды работ. 1. Первое обращение 2. Первая встреча. Консультация 3. Заключение соглашения 4. Оплата 5. Вступление в дело 6. Ознакомление с доступными материалами 7. Участие в проверке в порядке ст. 144 УПК РФ 8. Дача объяснения 9. Предварительное следствие 10. Допрос 11. Очная ставка 12. Избрание меры пресечения 13. Участие в обыске 14. Производство экспертиз 15. Заявление ходатайств 16. Обжалование действий в порядке ст. 124-125 УПК РФ 17. Переквалификация 18. Ознакомление с материалами уголовного дела в порядке ст. 217 УПК РФ 19. Отдельные следственные действия (разовые поручения) 20. Суд 21. Допрос в суде 22. Заявление ходатайств 23. Исследование доказательств 24. Возвращение дела прокурору 25. Прения 26. Замечания на протокол 27. Обжалование приговора 28. Апелляция 29. Кассация

Preparing download options

Popular

HD video

Only sound

All

* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."

** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

How can I download "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу" video?

http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.
The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.
UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.
UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

Which format of "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу" video should I choose?

The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

Why does my computer freeze when loading a "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу" video?

The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

How can I download "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу" video to my phone?

You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

How can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу"?

The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

How can I save a frame from a video "Как работает адвокат по уголовному делу"?

This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

What's the price of all this stuff?

It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.