background top icon
background center wave icon
background filled rhombus icon
background two lines icon
background stroke rhombus icon

Download "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет"

input logo icon
Table of contents
|

Table of contents

0:00
Главные тезисы интервью
1:14
Подписание интеграционных карт — это фикция или жест в сторону Запада?
3:59
Зачем Путин наращивает военное присутствие в Беларуси?
6:21
Почему Путин ведёт диалог с Западом на языке агрессии?
11:29
Способны ли санкции уничтожить беларусский режим и страдает ли от них Путин?
18:46
Как пострадает Беларусь от запуска «Северного потока-2»?
20:40
Способна ли Польша полностью отказаться от российского газа?
24:24
Кто замешан в миграционном кризисе на границе Беларуси и ЕС?
26:42
Как закрытие пункта погранконтроля на беларусско-польской границе скажется на российской экономике?
28:23
Почему новая Беларусь в период экономических реформ рискует повторить судьбу России в 90-х?
29:58
План Маршалла поможет?
32:03
Работает ли приватизация?
33:49
Способна ли Беларусь в будущем просуществовать без вступления в Евросоюз?
36:25
Смогут ли беларусы избавиться от режима мирным способом?
Similar videos from our catalog
|

Similar videos from our catalog

Беларусь вступает в войну / Оптимизм Лукашенко / Российские провокации
18:05

Беларусь вступает в войну / Оптимизм Лукашенко / Российские провокации

Channel: Malanka Media
Трибунал для диктаторов / Беларусский Майдан / Хорошие русские
33:08

Трибунал для диктаторов / Беларусский Майдан / Хорошие русские

Channel: Malanka Media
⚡Беларусь под угрозой / Партизаном оказался милиционер / Польские школы переведут на русский
7:09

⚡Беларусь под угрозой / Партизаном оказался милиционер / Польские школы переведут на русский

Channel: Malanka Media
КГБ взялся за айтишников / Добровольцев лишат гражданства // Новости Беларуси
6:54

КГБ взялся за айтишников / Добровольцев лишат гражданства // Новости Беларуси

Channel: Malanka Media
Самые опасные животные Беларуси / Личный зоопарк Лукашенко
11:51

Самые опасные животные Беларуси / Личный зоопарк Лукашенко

Channel: Bes Live
❓Народ спросит // народное ополчение, выживание в кризис, русификация Беларуси
1:09:00

❓Народ спросит // народное ополчение, выживание в кризис, русификация Беларуси

Channel: Маланка Live
Блокпосты в Столине / Деревообработка обошла санкции // Новости регионов Беларуси
4:47

Блокпосты в Столине / Деревообработка обошла санкции // Новости регионов Беларуси

Channel: Malanka Media
Правительство в изгнании / Санкции от Украины / Экономические хитрости Лукашенко
12:35

Правительство в изгнании / Санкции от Украины / Экономические хитрости Лукашенко

Channel: Malanka Media
Ядерная угроза из Беларуси / Суть народного ополчения / Советизация школ
17:00

Ядерная угроза из Беларуси / Суть народного ополчения / Советизация школ

Channel: Malanka Media
Перечеркнуть референдум / Международный провал режима / Слухи о перемирии с Лукашенко
18:43

Перечеркнуть референдум / Международный провал режима / Слухи о перемирии с Лукашенко

Channel: Malanka Media
Video tags
|

Video tags

маланка
маланка новости
маланка медиа ютуб
маланка ньюс
беларусь сегодня
беларусь новости
новости бай
белорусские новости
новости тут
реальная беларусь
белсат
nexta live
лукашенко сегодня
беларусь политика
экономика чалый
сергей алексашенко последнее
алексашенко интервью
алексашенко сегодня
путин лукашенко санкции
санкции против беларуси
северный поток 2
план маршалла для беларуси
реальная беларусь лукашенко
белавиа новости
лукашенко эмбарго
огп тв
интервью
беларусь
Subtitles
|

Subtitles

subtitles menu arrow
  • ruRussian
Download
00:00:03
suitcase without a handle Putin says listen,
00:00:06
can I put 1000
00:00:09
tanks there Lukashenko years, what is the question there is
00:00:11
no war between Russia and Ukraine there is
00:00:13
a war in Russia with America, it just
00:00:15
happens in the territory of Ukraine when a
00:00:17
person is unable define to conduct a
00:00:21
dialogue in a modern language does not understand
00:00:23
what kind of modern world we are building, then he has nothing to offer in
00:00:25
diplomatic jargon in
00:00:27
diplomatic language
00:00:29
on the fifth side of the wall ours on this
00:00:31
side your network let you not come to us
00:00:33
we don’t want to visit you Lukashenko
00:00:35
was put in a corner Lukashenko was deprived of
00:00:38
afternoon tea let’s so let's say there, for
00:00:40
various reasons, the West decided not to
00:00:42
help Russia, so if the stars are shining, then
00:00:45
someone needs it, why Putin conducts dialogue with the
00:00:47
West only in the language of war, what
00:00:50
future awaits the Belarusians and why
00:00:53
Lukashenko is not afraid of sanctions, they asked a
00:00:55
Russian economist Sergei
00:00:57
Aleksashenko Sergei hello, I just
00:01:00
wanted to in order, first Belarus
00:01:03
Russia recently signed an integration
00:01:05
agreement, does it mean anything at all
00:01:07
or is it just another fiction,
00:01:09
so to speak, some kind of gesture
00:01:12
towards the West, good afternoon, well, it
00:01:14
seems to me that this should be treated
00:01:16
quite calmly
00:01:19
two countries, two states, two leaders 2
00:01:25
dictators are trying to agree on something
00:01:26
and it seems to me that they do not
00:01:30
understand the final goal very well, but insofar
00:01:33
as the bureaucracy cannot work
00:01:35
without a plan, then it was necessary to create
00:01:38
these road maps that lead to something,
00:01:40
but this is something like this, let us
00:01:43
Now we will agree that you will start building
00:01:44
roads, the report will be at the end we will see,
00:01:47
so I would treat this
00:01:49
quite calmly on the one hand,
00:01:52
Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and
00:01:54
Kyrgyzstan are members of the Eurasian
00:01:56
Union and this integration association in itself
00:02:00
provides for some kind of coordination of
00:02:03
some kind of approval actions elements
00:02:05
of legislation, therefore, once
00:02:07
you call yourself a load, get into the back of the truck,
00:02:09
therefore, in general, on the one hand, there seems to be
00:02:11
nothing wrong with this
00:02:14
if these agreements
00:02:17
provide for the
00:02:18
simplification of all procedures related to
00:02:20
crossing the border, the threat of
00:02:22
truckers with cargo, in general, it’s also
00:02:24
good there, regardless of the
00:02:26
political regime, but why as a
00:02:29
single space for labor goods,
00:02:31
it seems to me that the most important thing that
00:02:35
these agreements do not have is no
00:02:39
solution to any goals for political
00:02:41
integration, but there are no goals for the
00:02:44
integration of monetary policy, no
00:02:47
integration goals for unifying the
00:02:48
budget, but this means that the two
00:02:50
countries have agreed on the fact that they
00:02:53
will somehow be together like hard, in fact,
00:02:56
again, yes, this is because of economic
00:02:57
geography, it is very well known that there
00:03:00
economic ties between countries
00:03:01
located nearby are always closer
00:03:04
than those with countries that are located
00:03:05
far away, well, that is, if you look at it so
00:03:08
abstractly not Paying attention to the
00:03:10
political realities, there is nothing wrong with
00:03:11
this, but the countries can agree
00:03:14
on how it is more convenient for them to cooperate with
00:03:16
each other so that the economies there
00:03:18
work better among themselves, there are fewer barriers to
00:03:20
political ambitions, no declared,
00:03:22
so I take this quite
00:03:23
calmly, but the bureaucracy is something will
00:03:25
do, by and large, no clear
00:03:28
tasks have been set as we are for all
00:03:31
the good against all the bad, also for all
00:03:33
the good, but just after the signing of the
00:03:35
game cards we noticed a huge
00:03:38
redeployment of military equipment on the
00:03:40
territory of Belarus, that is, it is
00:03:41
increasing its number and many
00:03:45
political scientists here on live broadcasts they said
00:03:48
that perhaps the migration crisis was
00:03:50
created so that, on the sly, they could
00:03:52
say in simple terms that
00:03:54
even more military equipment could be
00:03:56
transferred to the territory of Belarus, they
00:03:57
agree with this, listen, I’m definitely
00:04:00
not an expert on military issues, I
00:04:03
know that for some time pom
00:04:05
two weeks before the signing of this package, the
00:04:07
agreement of the Minister of Defense signed
00:04:09
an agreement to extend the
00:04:11
presence of Russian military bases at the
00:04:16
Veliki Baranovichi radar communications center, respectively, for the
00:04:20
Russian armed forces there, these are
00:04:21
critical infrastructure facilities
00:04:23
for tracking missiles and a communications center
00:04:26
for the navy
00:04:28
As for the deployment of Russian troops
00:04:31
on the territory of Belarus,
00:04:33
but it seems to me that neither Putin nor Lukashenko
00:04:36
seriously pays attention to this, for
00:04:38
them the concept of a state border is
00:04:40
somehow absent, that is, Putin says
00:04:43
listen, can I place
00:04:45
1000 Lukashenko tanks there with you, that’s the question
00:04:47
here those bills like pay money place
00:04:50
with him you can’t be in Russia if
00:04:52
there’s no place to put put put
00:04:55
Putin has some understanding of his own, he
00:04:58
recently told me that we want to
00:05:00
keep the West in suspense, he clearly
00:05:02
expressed his intention, it
00:05:05
seems to me that this is the deployment of Russian
00:05:07
troops along the border with Ukraine,
00:05:08
the deployment of Russian troops in Belarus is
00:05:11
his constant talk, we need such a
00:05:13
missile, such a missile will now be put into
00:05:16
service there at the beginning of the year, this is an element of
00:05:18
dialogue with the West that is
00:05:21
not diplomatic, and indirectly this is
00:05:24
communication with the West while you show us we
00:05:26
have something to threaten you with, these are not always
00:05:30
if things happen at the same time it doesn’t
00:05:32
mean that they are connected to each other, it seems to me that it’s
00:05:34
just a coincidence, well, because
00:05:36
in my understanding, it’s still something like
00:05:39
Putin at some point, well, stepped
00:05:42
aside from the political unification, in the
00:05:44
end he had all these 28 agreements,
00:05:46
well,
00:05:48
2826
00:05:49
but all the geopolitical games are
00:05:52
definitely not considered at all in the format of these
00:05:54
agreements.
00:05:55
You tell the feeling that you say
00:05:57
that in this way he is showing something to
00:05:58
the West, he is conducting a dialogue in this way, and
00:06:01
why is he not conducting a dialogue at the
00:06:03
diplomatic level, namely in the language and
00:06:05
graphics of aggression? not diplomatic,
00:06:07
then military language, then I’m actually Putin
00:06:09
and she’s talking to the West in
00:06:11
just sign language, and
00:06:16
actually, there’s nothing diplomatic here, it
00:06:17
seems to me that Putin’s problem is from the point of
00:06:21
view of foreign policy, he puts forward
00:06:23
a thesis and he wants how to achieve what then the
00:06:25
goals that the modern world is not very
00:06:28
clear, yes, but look there again we take and
00:06:31
the last of those speeches there on December 1,
00:06:33
Russia has its own red lines and they
00:06:36
pass because the hotel heard that the
00:06:38
President of the United States spoke about some red
00:06:40
lines that are in his head but only
00:06:42
Barack Obama is talking about Syria, and if there’s something on the dash
00:06:44
there’s a date, then
00:06:46
we’re talking about America alone, talking about Syria, and I don’t
00:06:48
know there,
00:06:50
Erdogan in Turkey really talked about the red
00:06:53
line, no, a Soviet
00:06:55
Russian plane flew into the territory,
00:06:57
they took everything here but they knocked down no red
00:06:59
lines there, it’s not just that they broke it, they
00:07:01
knocked down Putin has some kind of thing, he lives,
00:07:03
they teach the past, yes, he lives with these
00:07:06
Soviet ideas of some kind
00:07:07
from the same century as I already lived onion, I was in the
00:07:10
late seventies, the Soviet Union
00:07:12
there in Pershing in Europe and we are now
00:07:13
deploying our missiles, all this happened and
00:07:16
Putin has it, he lives with these
00:07:18
constructions of the past and he is trying to
00:07:20
force a conversation on the West in the Yalta
00:07:23
world about the division of spheres of influence, and for the West,
00:07:26
spheres of influence for dinner, how to say
00:07:28
listen, what do spheres mean? influence
00:07:29
sphere of influence so later the American goes
00:07:32
through American technology the
00:07:34
American iPhone, which is in China,
00:07:36
this is the sphere of influence, it is clear that there
00:07:38
China is not an object and there America
00:07:41
never claims aquitar there was a
00:07:42
sphere of influence, nevertheless, through
00:07:44
American technology this is the sphere of
00:07:46
influence of America through the American
00:07:48
films and there through European culture,
00:07:50
so he is an attempt to
00:07:53
divide geographically into this during the Cold
00:07:54
War, we can please you, we are already drawing an
00:07:56
iron barrier, an iron curtain, on
00:07:59
this side of the wall, ours, on this side,
00:08:01
your strength, let you not come to us, we do
00:08:03
n’t want you spheres of influence divided
00:08:05
fences now it is impossible to build a fence
00:08:08
and Putin wants to build it and therefore the
00:08:11
channel tells the West let's build a
00:08:12
fence battle we need a fence when a person is
00:08:15
not able to define a
00:08:17
dialogue in a modern language does not understand
00:08:19
how the modern world works, then he has nothing in
00:08:21
diplomatic jargon
00:08:23
in diplomatic language
00:08:25
suggest I remember I had
00:08:27
conversations there about three years ago in Washington
00:08:29
when there was still the Trump administration and
00:08:33
there in the morning I wanted to make a
00:08:35
big deal with Putin to agree on something, I
00:08:38
sat with one former
00:08:39
high-ranking official of the
00:08:41
Republican administration on
00:08:42
the previous one and here we are with them like this
00:08:45
role-playing game I say, well, okay, that’s
00:08:47
what you wanted from Putin, and he
00:08:49
can’t offer anything. All our conversations with
00:08:51
Putin mean that what you will give us in exchange in this
00:08:53
deal boils down to the fact that well, I
00:08:56
won’t tell you until the articles are sticks
00:08:58
put it in the wheels according to a good
00:09:00
agreement, you want from us this this
00:09:02
this this and you just won’t do
00:09:04
[ __ ] to us there, well, you understand, when you
00:09:06
highly value his position as a bully, that
00:09:09
is, either you pay the cops a kickback
00:09:12
or I’ll do nasty things to you. these are
00:09:14
Giza, so it’s very difficult to talk to him diplomatically, do
00:09:17
you think he doesn’t
00:09:19
understand or his specific goal is clear,
00:09:21
well, listen, I don’t have an answer to
00:09:24
this question, but I can’t for the life of
00:09:26
people, but if we talk about Lukashenko, then
00:09:27
everything is clear there, and the flask whistles like
00:09:29
many say from the beads from the eyes there is a feeling
00:09:31
that there is already something there, some kind of intelligence there
00:09:33
and some kind of matrix for you and
00:09:34
look, wait, Putin is not a fool, yes,
00:09:38
here Putin is not a fool, Putin’s head
00:09:41
works quite soberly from his point of
00:09:45
view, yes he he tenaciously holds information, he
00:09:48
knows how to analyze it, he can
00:09:50
hold it, use it, so on, you just
00:09:52
need to understand well that he has his
00:09:55
own coordinate system in his head, and yes, he
00:09:57
lives in his own worldview, but Putin
00:10:00
really lives in the world, you need a
00:10:03
traditional widget like this, you can
00:10:06
give a bunch of dictatorial examples there
00:10:07
regimes when he believes that the West is asleep
00:10:10
and sees Putin attacking Russia there
00:10:13
from the Kremlin, taking out Russian
00:10:15
resources to plunder and take for himself, he
00:10:17
constantly talks about this, remember there is
00:10:20
this phrase that there is a West speed with how to
00:10:22
snatch the claws out of a Russian’s bags, he sees
00:10:24
the world as a struggle there is a West that the
00:10:27
aggressive West wants to bring peace-loving
00:10:30
Russia to its knees and there is no
00:10:32
war between Russia and Ukraine, there is a war in
00:10:34
Russia with America, it’s just not happening in the
00:10:36
territory of Ukraine and it’s not Russia that
00:10:39
attacked Ukraine, it’s America that attacked
00:10:41
Russia, Russia is forced to defend itself in
00:10:45
this in This is the same thing when his vision of the
00:10:47
world is like this past shoot vision,
00:10:49
that is, reality, so talking about
00:10:51
it adequately inadequate understands does not
00:10:53
understand, he lives like this and when you
00:10:56
talk with Putin in the broad
00:10:58
sense of the word and when you analyze
00:10:59
Putin’s many in his picture of the world,
00:11:02
it is pointless to get involved look at
00:11:06
Putin’s actions there from an
00:11:08
outside observer, you will never
00:11:11
understand why he is doing this today, the
00:11:14
5th package of sanctions against Belarus has come into force,
00:11:15
the United States is already talking about the
00:11:19
development of sanctions, do you think these
00:11:21
sanctions somehow put pressure on the regime, are
00:11:24
they noticeable and to what extent? Putin
00:11:27
is suffering from these sanctions, these sanctions are a
00:11:29
tool of diplomatic pressure, and
00:11:33
I often have conversations at home about what kind of
00:11:37
auction policy the OSCE can pursue,
00:11:39
I say, let’s agree
00:11:40
first on what the goal is, before
00:11:42
analyzing the strength or weakness of the
00:11:44
new sanctions, click on what goal the OSCE
00:11:47
sets for itself in the European Union there are the
00:11:49
United States of America,
00:11:51
sanctions have almost never led to a change in the
00:11:53
political regime, which means we can
00:11:55
say that people there are sober and in
00:11:58
Brussels and Washington, respectively, the
00:12:00
goal of removing Lukashenko is not worth it, that
00:12:04
is, of course they wanted
00:12:05
Lukashenko to leave the political arena there,
00:12:07
but that doesn’t mean not because the sanctions will put
00:12:11
pressure on him, they wanted to
00:12:13
continue there, you can use sanctions to try to change
00:12:16
behavior,
00:12:17
but the most striking example is the Iranian
00:12:19
sanctions, which forced Iran to
00:12:21
negotiate a nuclear deal and even
00:12:23
write it down, but the sanctions were very
00:12:25
tough, much stronger than those
00:12:27
which today are imposed on Belarus here
00:12:30
and there with a
00:12:31
prize as it sounds very strange, but in
00:12:34
Iran there were elections in which the rules were
00:12:36
convinced at that moment by the progressive
00:12:38
president of his candidates, Rouhani, who
00:12:40
went to negotiate and reach some kind of deal
00:12:42
with, in this regard, there are
00:12:44
Iranian sanctions Iran's policy has achieved its goal
00:12:46
for some time has
00:12:48
changed further
00:12:51
sanctions can be carried out relatively speaking like the
00:12:54
United States of America in relation to the
00:12:56
Soviet Union water there are
00:12:58
technological limitations when
00:13:00
access to American
00:13:01
Western technologies is closed
00:13:03
such technical isolation and which there
00:13:06
should cause lags further
00:13:09
sanctions can be added as Obama
00:13:11
announced when against Putin against
00:13:12
Russia, simply nexia of Crimea, we will
00:13:15
increase the economic price of political
00:13:17
decisions, that is, yes, you made a decision on the
00:13:20
annexation of Crimea before you made a decision on
00:13:22
aggression in the Donbass, we cannot
00:13:24
force you to change this decision, you will
00:13:26
be buried if only America
00:13:28
understands well that this is beyond our power, but we
00:13:30
will make you pay for it, you, as the
00:13:32
Russian economy, will
00:13:34
pay for this for some time, the Russian
00:13:36
economy really paid for it, but it
00:13:37
seems to me that sanctions against
00:13:39
Belarus are from the last of the last
00:13:42
series, that is, simply for that finger for those
00:13:46
political decisions for the policy
00:13:48
that Lukashenko is pursuing in relation to
00:13:50
his people in relation to his country, the
00:13:53
regime of the economy of Belarus will pay
00:13:55
Lukashenko was put in a corner,
00:13:58
well,
00:14:01
Lukashenko was deprived of an afternoon snack, let's just
00:14:03
say that's what we have and dessert for lunch,
00:14:07
let's continue to understand well
00:14:09
before that the scrotum
00:14:13
maneuvered between the West and Russia for a very long time, that
00:14:15
is, he never wanted such
00:14:17
close subordination, Russia always tried to
00:14:20
find a second point of support as if
00:14:21
to maneuver and it turns out that the false
00:14:24
should have been known more, but not because of the sanctions,
00:14:27
let’s say you can’t fall asleep because the fact
00:14:28
that not only for the sand, but because of what
00:14:31
he did in August September
00:14:33
October of the twentieth year before the court in
00:14:36
saying
00:14:37
how you also had no need to mock your
00:14:41
people, I’ll say so this was the
00:14:43
reason that he launched all of us,
00:14:45
we don’t communicate We don’t recognize you and
00:14:48
you can’t count on us anymore;
00:14:51
today we do
00:14:53
n’t even want to talk to you, and in this situation,
00:14:55
of course, Lukashenko only has 1 on
00:14:58
1 fulcrum left, then Putin, and there the financial
00:15:01
support of Russia does not continue, and in
00:15:03
this regard I am quite skeptical
00:15:06
I look at the effectiveness of the anti and the
00:15:09
males there were against the main
00:15:11
Belarusian exporters before this and fertilizers and
00:15:13
petroleum products, I believe that if Putin
00:15:17
wants a date there, Russian companies
00:15:19
will agree with Belarusian ones and on the exchange of
00:15:21
markets, well, that is, relatively speaking, those
00:15:23
markets where Belaruskali supplied
00:15:25
will supply Uralkali and vice versa those
00:15:28
market where we supply there refinery oil growth
00:15:30
there where Belarusian gasoline will come
00:15:33
gasoline from oil growth will
00:15:35
come to other markets somehow they will
00:15:38
pretend to pretend that there it is not
00:15:40
Belarusian gasoline but the growth of oil
00:15:42
and that’s where it will actually end,
00:15:45
so I don’t believe that
00:15:48
such economic sanctions on
00:15:49
Russian exporters will be strong, in my understanding,
00:15:51
they will not be very effective and
00:15:54
Lukashenko is much more sensitive to him than the
00:15:57
loss of the opportunity
00:15:59
to attract big money, loans
00:16:01
from the West, than these sanctions
00:16:04
pressures, but many are discussing it
00:16:07
live in interviews the topic of
00:16:09
how the Kremlin will support
00:16:11
Lukashenko with debt, is this beneficial for the Kremlin? Well,
00:16:13
from your words it follows that the lower
00:16:16
the economy of Belarus falls now, the
00:16:18
more profitable it is for Putin economically, you
00:16:22
know, I didn’t omit it, so Lukashenko and
00:16:25
Belarus for Putin are a
00:16:28
suitcase without a handle, but with On the one hand, I do
00:16:32
n’t want to spend these 35 billion
00:16:35
dollars a year there to support Belarus, on
00:16:39
the other hand, this is not God knows what kind of
00:16:41
money for the Russian economy for the
00:16:42
Russian budget, you
00:16:44
need to understand what the
00:16:46
Russian budget is and how much 300
00:16:49
billion dollars is worth, well, than one
00:16:50
percent is needed this is called rounding
00:16:53
in the Ministry of Finance, I don’t know, one percent of
00:16:56
Russian exports is less than one
00:16:58
percent of Russian exports, well, that is,
00:16:59
in general, this is not a catastrophic
00:17:02
burden on the Russian budget, but on the other
00:17:04
hand, Putin is
00:17:06
categorically interested in
00:17:08
maintaining political control or
00:17:10
strong political influence in Belarus
00:17:12
although it happens because of these two military bases
00:17:14
yes because no for from his point of view
00:17:17
again his vision of the world the need for
00:17:19
defense is a critical
00:17:21
infrastructure facility just like you for him the
00:17:23
military base in Sevastopol was a critical object
00:17:25
and in the same way for him
00:17:27
critical even more critical
00:17:29
objects, in fact, they are much
00:17:31
more important, much more
00:17:33
important than Sevastopol, and military bases
00:17:35
in Belarus, so this is a payment for
00:17:38
loyalty for political loyalty
00:17:40
to Lukashenko so that
00:17:42
nothing happens to these objects, again
00:17:45
Putin for Putin, Belarus and Ukraine,
00:17:48
by the way, this a buffer between Russia is necessary, and it’s
00:17:52
no coincidence that the museum again returns
00:17:55
to this statement of his, even approaching,
00:17:58
we want, as he says, yes, so that she would
00:18:00
issue legal guarantees not to
00:18:02
approach the border in Russia, that is, for
00:18:04
him, the disappearance of Belarus as an
00:18:05
independent state is what kind of
00:18:07
building is the way out on the direct line
00:18:08
of contact with NATO,
00:18:10
China is too risky a task for him,
00:18:13
and it seems to me that they are ready to support the
00:18:17
Belarusians with such not very big money, or the Koshenko regime there,
00:18:20
or after Lukashenko, I think
00:18:22
that Putin will negotiate with any
00:18:24
other president of Belarus with his favorite
00:18:26
government Well, at a minimum, about
00:18:28
neutral to
00:18:31
northern status, then two, how soon can he
00:18:34
take on some kind of force and how much
00:18:36
Belarus will suffer from this, and
00:18:38
does this mean that we again return to the
00:18:41
previous question, that Lukashenko
00:18:43
will again be even more dependent on Russia, but
00:18:46
you know even more when you depend one hundred
00:18:47
percent, well, it’s not monetary, maybe one
00:18:50
hundred and two percent depends, well,
00:18:52
probably yes,
00:18:54
theoretically, the launch of Nord Stream 2
00:18:57
could completely stop the transit of gas
00:18:58
through Belarus to Poland, well, in
00:19:01
fact, we saw this picture in November
00:19:03
already in There were several days in the month of November
00:19:05
when there was a
00:19:07
gas accident
00:19:10
there, a strange story because from under the
00:19:14
data of Gazprom through Belarus the gas
00:19:16
was pumped to Poland, it came but from
00:19:19
Poland to Germany it no longer went, that is,
00:19:20
apparently the volumes of gas were so detailed
00:19:22
that Poland
00:19:24
already bought gas from Germany it’s not needed, and there’s loading, I
00:19:28
looked at the statistics, we talk a lot
00:19:31
about the fact that the Ukrainian gas transportation
00:19:32
system suffers from the fact that Gazprom
00:19:35
pumps little gas,
00:19:36
pumping gas through Ukraine is low to
00:19:39
stable, but all the drops down to
00:19:42
zero, they happen, sat and last
00:19:43
year through Belarus on therefore, of course, the
00:19:46
launch of Nord Stream 2 can be
00:19:48
stopped altogether at any moment until
00:19:51
gas transit through Belarus is stopped
00:19:53
again, the money is probably not very
00:19:55
big, well, it will be sensitive, it
00:19:58
will be sensitive, and the loss of
00:19:59
jobs and the loss of a stable flow, and
00:20:01
then the most important thing is that the gas transportation
00:20:03
system in addition that it pumps the gas
00:20:06
needed and from east to west
00:20:09
it also provides it in the same way as Ukraine,
00:20:11
this is a huge problem for the national
00:20:13
economy, that is, in addition to the
00:20:15
gas pressure there so that it
00:20:17
diverges throughout the country, and it
00:20:20
is clear that Putin will not cut off the supply of
00:20:23
gas to in the interests of Belarus, well,
00:20:25
some technological restrictions on the
00:20:27
operation of the gas transportation system
00:20:29
will arise, we’ll see, we’ll have to reduce it,
00:20:30
compress it, and so on, but how realistic is it
00:20:33
that Poland will completely refuse
00:20:35
Russian gas and conclude an agreement
00:20:38
with us, the catcher is now saying that nothing is impossible in the world,
00:20:40
and
00:20:42
theoretically everything is possible you can probably
00:20:46
conclude long-term contracts with
00:20:49
Norway for the supply of gas to Poland,
00:20:51
the question of price is this,
00:20:55
it may just be more expensive, it
00:20:58
may just be more expensive, I’m again children,
00:21:00
as in the last twenty years, generally
00:21:03
speaking, the
00:21:05
most serious structural snakes have occurred in the European gas market,
00:21:07
that is, there are still 20 years ago there was a pipe
00:21:10
from the east to and where it came to there
00:21:12
was a pipe there from the northwest
00:21:15
from Norway where it came to came there
00:21:17
were not very large capacities there for
00:21:19
receiving liquefied gas and they were
00:21:21
limited in distribution now
00:21:23
after the gas crisis of 2006
00:21:26
when for the sake of Putin blocked the pipe to
00:21:28
Europe, the euro built a large number of
00:21:30
interconnectors of gas pipelines that
00:21:32
connect this entire system and today in
00:21:35
Europe you can practically pump gas in
00:21:36
any direction from any point to
00:21:38
another and there the European Commission
00:21:40
says that now there is no such threat
00:21:42
then sixth in the tenth year when
00:21:44
what -parts of Europe will begin to freeze
00:21:46
if Russia stops supplying gas before there
00:21:48
will be problems, but in principle almost
00:21:50
all of Europe will again have gas
00:21:53
coming there, that is, we can, so we as the
00:21:54
European Union and gas managers sell gas,
00:21:57
we can deliver gas to any point in Europe
00:21:59
before, so it’s not The question is whether
00:22:02
Poland can purchase from Norway if Norway
00:22:05
can end some of its
00:22:08
old contracts and redirect gas to conclude a
00:22:11
contract with Poland, well, probably yes,
00:22:13
as far as I understand in Norway, also
00:22:16
what is the production in Holland in general there, production in
00:22:18
Holland is simply quickly reduced to
00:22:20
how much in Norway I understand that gas production is
00:22:21
not growing now if economically there are
00:22:25
such opportunities, there is no need for other
00:22:27
countries
00:22:29
to completely stop
00:22:31
contacts with Russia, which Germany
00:22:36
has started and why do you understand, you need to
00:22:39
understand well that Poland has a certain layer of
00:22:42
political motivation for stopping
00:22:45
imports gas from Russia is a reduction in
00:22:49
dependence,
00:22:50
well, that is, the position of Poland is the historical
00:22:51
position of Poland that
00:22:54
Russia Poland Russia threatens Polish
00:22:56
independence that
00:22:58
Russia is a threat to the nominee for the
00:23:01
last three hundred years this threat
00:23:04
has materialized many times, then accordingly
00:23:06
Poland
00:23:07
Poland is ready to pay some price
00:23:11
to reduce its dependence on
00:23:12
Russia, including dependence in
00:23:15
terms of gas supplies, and where does Germany have a
00:23:17
different position? Germany is not afraid of
00:23:21
Russian political aggression; Germany
00:23:24
is ready to be corrupt; and for
00:23:26
Nord Stream 2, which gives Germany
00:23:30
two and a half billion euros in
00:23:31
savings per year, it is ready to spit
00:23:34
she is ready for the political unity of the European Union, she is
00:23:37
ready for the interests of her neighbors,
00:23:39
why should Germany refuse
00:23:42
Russian gas? There is cheaper, then
00:23:44
Putin built a pipe for his own money, that
00:23:46
is, we conquer attracts generally got it
00:23:48
for free and he offers us a cash register for
00:23:50
which we will save why we
00:23:52
need to refuse The Germans, they are like this
00:23:54
date, I think about it, so
00:23:57
find out how to believe that the whole of
00:24:01
Europe can refuse Russian
00:24:02
gas, but it’s probably impossible there,
00:24:04
Gazprom accounts for 35 percent of the
00:24:06
European gas market before replacing it with
00:24:09
anything today. How do you feel about the
00:24:12
condemnation of the Kremlin and the fact that
00:24:15
the Kremlin is supposedly participated in the migration crisis
00:24:18
and Lukashenko actually said recently that not
00:24:20
only Russians but also Chechens are also involved in this,
00:24:24
these as I believe that the
00:24:27
migration crisis on the border of
00:24:30
Belarus of the European Union is of course a
00:24:32
man-made crisis, yes of course
00:24:35
how is it if the stars light up, it means
00:24:37
someone needs it and so it is clear that if
00:24:40
suddenly such a channel for the transit of
00:24:43
refugees from problem countries to the European Union arose
00:24:47
and we are in Belarus, well, someone developed these routes
00:24:50
as I have not seen evidence
00:24:52
and I cannot confidently say that the Kremlin
00:24:54
advised on it there too, but I think that the Kremlin
00:24:59
looked at these approvingly the
00:25:02
fruits of the Kremlin’s policy, as we have
00:25:04
already said, is to
00:25:06
put a spoke in the wheels to cause
00:25:10
destabilization, that is, in fact,
00:25:12
in relation to Ukraine, in
00:25:14
relation to Europe, in relation to America,
00:25:16
but the main task of the Kremlin is to create
00:25:19
political tension
00:25:21
to destabilize the situation in reality in fact
00:25:23
there, well, you know, like a signature handwriting
00:25:26
here from here from here from Putin John here from he is not a
00:25:28
chess player he doesn’t know how to play long games there
00:25:30
and in someone else’s game the most important thing is that you
00:25:32
took on an opponent and you need to throw him off
00:25:34
balance in order to quickly carry out
00:25:35
some kind of trick that’s all foreign policy
00:25:37
Kremlin policy and you throw your opponent
00:25:39
out of balance, it’s clear that well, there was a
00:25:41
migration crisis there a few years
00:25:43
ago when Syrian refugees there in
00:25:45
the millions were coming through Turkey, the machine
00:25:46
directly says in Turkey they gave billions,
00:25:49
give me up to bent over once you
00:25:52
did it, and there are three several years
00:25:56
ago there the Kremlin said the Kremlin
00:25:57
propaganda said that there are refugees
00:26:00
there, dissolving that political
00:26:02
identity of Europe there will generally cause
00:26:04
a nightmare, and now we are these poor
00:26:06
unfortunate people, they are harsh there, these
00:26:08
tough ones and the Polish border guards almost
00:26:11
kill them with a flamethrower, that is, it is
00:26:13
obvious that this is how well, at
00:26:16
least the Kremlin is using all this
00:26:17
for its propaganda, well, it means apparently
00:26:20
he was well prepared for this, I think I know
00:26:22
that at the border I will now go once to the
00:26:24
Polish border, there are huge queues
00:26:26
of trucks, mostly Russian
00:26:28
carriers,
00:26:29
now on holidays there are much more of them how is
00:26:33
this being strongly reflected, is it already or
00:26:35
will be reflected in the distant future,
00:26:37
such interruptions in supplies, despite all the
00:26:41
importance of these road transports, you
00:26:43
need to understand well that there is no such kind of ground, I’m
00:26:45
glad that you will find out there,
00:26:47
relatively speaking, there are 50 percent of the
00:26:49
Russian market, this is some
00:26:50
specific product item being carried out
00:26:52
only on the forum and just along this
00:26:54
road
00:26:55
on the Russian market in the consumer
00:26:58
market, approximately 50 percent in monetary
00:27:01
terms are imported goods and there it all
00:27:04
starts with this cheese, milk, bananas and
00:27:06
ending with not me, electronics, equipment,
00:27:08
etc., and failures in these supplies, failures in
00:27:12
logistics, they are in the whole world is not
00:27:15
angered by the shortage of goods and rising prices, but
00:27:18
in Russia inflation is growing, it
00:27:21
is obvious that based on the results of 21 years, but it is
00:27:24
already off the charts for eight percent,
00:27:26
to say if there is any influence here,
00:27:29
this stop of Belarusian transit,
00:27:31
I think that it is hardly visible, yes
00:27:34
because well, if the trucks there started
00:27:36
to slow down two or three weeks ago, well,
00:27:39
it’s unlikely that this has already had an impact on the
00:27:41
consumer market there, question 10,
00:27:43
the technical chains of work are a little longer, but
00:27:45
there all three weeks ahead New Year
00:27:47
holidays gifts, it’s quite likely that
00:27:49
this could affect the new one again well,
00:27:51
inflation there will not be 8.3 8.5 percent,
00:27:55
you and I won’t even know the
00:27:58
reasons for this, so how will it affect it, yes
00:28:00
it will be catastrophic, most likely
00:28:03
no, I looked at your report, you talked
00:28:06
about the new Belarus, that when carrying out
00:28:09
economic reforms, what mistakes
00:28:11
will not be allowed in the new Belarus It’s clear that
00:28:14
we made a huge report out of it, we
00:28:15
won’t tell our viewers now, but here are
00:28:17
some specific theses to
00:28:19
talk about and so as not to repeat the fate of the
00:28:21
90s, what is being discussed there, I think that the discussion was about
00:28:24
the following: that today the economy of
00:28:28
Belarus is well, as Belarus is not until now It has
00:28:32
not yet passed this complete transit from a
00:28:34
planned economy to a market economy,
00:28:36
this transition
00:28:39
provides for freedom of price, freedom of
00:28:41
the exchange rate, that is, a market
00:28:42
economy, it must get leverage, this is
00:28:45
my tool and bring itself into
00:28:46
balance, today the Belarusian economy
00:28:49
is in a clearly unbalanced
00:28:52
state because it receives
00:28:53
constant supply from Russia, but these
00:28:57
three-five billion dollars a year
00:28:58
allow the Belarusian economy to
00:29:00
create some kind of artificial price system,
00:29:03
if Russian support runs out
00:29:05
at home, Belarusian imports collapse, the
00:29:08
consumer market is disrupted, the exchange
00:29:10
rate of the Belarusian ruble collapses, and so on, it’s
00:29:13
unclear what’s happening with the
00:29:14
banking system and this part
00:29:17
called macroeconomic
00:29:18
stabilization before the experience of the 90s suggests that it
00:29:22
will quickly await him, therefore, in my
00:29:24
opinion, the key task there in the
00:29:26
Belarusian economy is a clear
00:29:30
understanding that there is that stage of reforms,
00:29:32
those tools that must work
00:29:34
quickly, that is, one cannot count on the fact
00:29:36
that there is Putin Russia, it doesn’t matter who
00:29:39
will be there, that we will build our own
00:29:41
macroeconomic structure that
00:29:42
we will have someone who will help you, no one
00:29:44
will help you, based on the fact that you are
00:29:46
starting with a clean slate, and the
00:29:49
worst thing you can try to do is
00:29:51
to hold on to external prices for
00:29:53
sensitivity to the stage nothing will
00:29:54
happen the same Marshall plan and this,
00:29:58
listen to the Marshall plan it’s absolutely
00:30:00
to find a temple and in Russia they also believed
00:30:02
in the Marshall plan they also expected
00:30:04
to receive some kind of big help from the
00:30:06
West but promising does not mean getting married yes
00:30:09
and as a result, there the West, for various
00:30:12
reasons, decided not to help Russia, well
00:30:15
then, yes, you gave some small
00:30:17
money that allowed, as they say,
00:30:18
to avoid a more difficult development of the situation,
00:30:21
but in principle, Poland did not receive any significant
00:30:23
economic support from Russia at the
00:30:25
initial stage of its reforms Will
00:30:27
Belarus be able to
00:30:30
come to an agreement for these
00:30:32
hypothetical situations? It all depends on
00:30:33
who will act as a
00:30:35
negotiator on Belarus’s side. It’s one thing if the
00:30:37
democratically
00:30:40
elected president with liberal
00:30:41
views is not familiar with pro-European ones, and another
00:30:43
thing if some kind of pro-Kremlin politician comes instead of Lukashenko.
00:30:47
will tell me, and
00:30:49
now you and I can only guess, we are
00:30:52
in a wild task in general, but if
00:30:54
it doesn’t matter again from the political
00:30:57
orientation, I will drown in this, the leader of
00:31:00
Belarus, and it seems to me that the main
00:31:02
task is to understand that there are reforms
00:31:04
that need to be done quickly, yes there are
00:31:06
the reforms that need to be done, well, that’s
00:31:10
where the modern economy is, it shows
00:31:12
that the state-run economy there is
00:31:15
working poorly,
00:31:17
it’s less efficient, you gave an order like
00:31:20
everyone took the lead, in fact, the
00:31:22
number doesn’t work like that,
00:31:24
some shrinkage begins there, ut Russians as a result
00:31:26
all decisions are made based not
00:31:29
on economic feasibility, on something
00:31:31
else, therefore you need to
00:31:33
understand that in Belarus there is a very
00:31:35
large share of the public sector and this is somehow
00:31:38
necessary, you want it, that is, this is how to do
00:31:40
privatization through what
00:31:43
tools and in what
00:31:45
sequence who will be there there is
00:31:47
an opportunity will not be able to
00:31:48
buy, let Russian capital in, don’t
00:31:51
let in Russian capital, don’t let in
00:31:52
German capital, don’t let in these are
00:31:55
questions that you would need to have an
00:31:57
answer to and in advance it’s always like
00:31:59
some kind of panacea or it doesn’t always
00:32:01
work, I don’t know any a
00:32:05
successfully developed economy with high
00:32:07
growth rates in Penza, which would rely
00:32:09
on state property, that is,
00:32:11
it is clear that it exists there and in France, in
00:32:13
America, there is a bank at some
00:32:15
crisis moment that nationalized the banks,
00:32:18
even that there, this railroad,
00:32:20
amtrak, it shares gas with you the state
00:32:22
is in control, but practice
00:32:24
shows that private business always
00:32:26
makes more effective decisions; the
00:32:28
economy, often relying on
00:32:30
initiative, works better, you can leave the
00:32:32
state canon where you can, but
00:32:34
then the growth rate of the Belarusian economy
00:32:37
there, the world one, will grow three and a half
00:32:39
dollars, which will grow three, that
00:32:41
suits you if it’s worth it please no
00:32:42
questions if you want seven percent
00:32:45
seven percent you can’t have this
00:32:47
economic growth if you don’t have an
00:32:49
influx of foreign direct investment from
00:32:51
it money this technology this human
00:32:54
management this is in connection with foreign
00:32:57
markets and then you ask the
00:32:59
Germans the Poles the Czechs and you want there here the
00:33:02
state forearm just give
00:33:04
money yes no of course I’ll decide on we give
00:33:06
money until 9 we give money there in general you
00:33:08
want to manage the processes yes we want
00:33:11
look so that the money technology works
00:33:12
so that all this can be
00:33:14
used effectively then you get privatization and it
00:33:16
gives something to someone you give up
00:33:18
control as if and then you go from three
00:33:21
percent of growth to seven
00:33:22
percent of growth, so you decide
00:33:24
first, either it is important for you that
00:33:26
the state then but then the price is 3
00:33:30
percent or for the possibilities of interest
00:33:32
and then the state does not work out the course of
00:33:35
Belarus free after the change of power
00:33:38
is the European Union worth it Belarus can join the
00:33:41
union or Belarus can itself
00:33:43
be quite independently a
00:33:45
democratic country and develop to
00:33:47
earn money without the European Union, look,
00:33:50
as I said, even that is the question of
00:33:53
economic geography,
00:33:54
Belarus is one way or another it is squeezed by the
00:33:57
European Union on the one hand, Russia on the other
00:33:59
hand can be treated differently there
00:34:03
economic potential when comparing, but
00:34:05
nevertheless, on the one hand, there is a powerful
00:34:07
economic bloc on the other hand, a
00:34:08
fairly large economic holding,
00:34:10
but at least several times larger than
00:34:12
Belarus, and
00:34:13
it is clear that, but ideally, Belarus
00:34:17
should have good relations with both of them,
00:34:18
that is it should be like an
00:34:21
economy sandwiched between two, but
00:34:24
pretend that no one exists on the right or on the left,
00:34:26
and we’ll just
00:34:28
fly in the cloud in the cloud economy, and
00:34:30
we’ll live there on our own, so it won’t
00:34:32
work. I don’t really like the idea of
00:34:34
joining the European Union. I said this to
00:34:36
my colleagues in Ukraine, where I traveled a lot,
00:34:38
let me think that the goal of
00:34:41
joining the European Union is wrong and
00:34:43
because the European Union, unfortunately, has become
00:34:45
such a large bureaucratic structure,
00:34:47
decisions in which decisions are often delayed and
00:34:50
decisions are made by
00:34:52
consensus, which means that it is not
00:34:54
always beneficial for you but having said this, Igor,
00:34:56
wait over there, it
00:35:00
is important for Ukraine and Belarus not to be a member of the European Union,
00:35:02
but it is important to have access to the markets of the European Union,
00:35:05
and for this there are other forms, for example,
00:35:08
there is a European Economic
00:35:09
Association, and where does Switzerland and Norway belong there,
00:35:11
please, you can just about go
00:35:14
along this path, that is you align
00:35:16
legislation economic freedom
00:35:18
movement of labor capital work
00:35:20
goods there but at the same time you are a park you are not a
00:35:22
bunch of you do not have to
00:35:24
sign all the agreements you are not
00:35:26
obliged to participate in the development of
00:35:29
delays there yes you do not get access to the
00:35:31
European budget new ones bear a
00:35:34
bureaucratic burden that
00:35:36
forces about your farmers,
00:35:38
do something according to European rules, a guest
00:35:40
live according to his own rules, that’s why I would
00:35:42
say that the pilot for Belarus,
00:35:45
access to the European market is very important,
00:35:47
but it can be obtained without joining the
00:35:50
European Union, here’s the last question, you are, of course, an
00:35:52
economist, but I’m interested in yours
00:35:53
point of view, you have already said that it
00:35:55
is impossible to overcome the regime with sanctions, the course of
00:35:58
action of the democratic forces of Belarus,
00:36:01
unfortunately, is aimed at putting pressure on
00:36:03
economic or sanctions or there are
00:36:05
strikes that are not yet working, people
00:36:08
do not go on strike, that is,
00:36:11
there is a feeling that we are kind of
00:36:13
driven into a corner and
00:36:14
and lost or do you still think that
00:36:17
two Russians have a chance and everyone says
00:36:19
that with a chance only forceful methods were
00:36:21
discussed yesterday on the forum, but
00:36:23
yours I had a very big
00:36:25
discussion on this topic on the form, it’s true, and
00:36:28
I liked the theses now I
00:36:31
won’t remember, someone said that
00:36:33
the revolution comes from below, before the
00:36:36
revolution there is always a movement from below and an
00:36:38
attempt to bring about rain, not in Russia, not
00:36:42
in Belarus, there are no tools and a
00:36:45
legislative peaceful change of power, that
00:36:48
is, it is impossible to win elections not from
00:36:49
Lukashenko not from Putin, that’s all there,
00:36:51
the legislation is written like this and the practice
00:36:54
in holding elections and summing up the results is
00:36:56
still building, you can win elections,
00:36:58
it’s impossible at first they simply won’t let you in,
00:37:01
and even if a random person gets
00:37:03
to choose from and then the results
00:37:04
are falsified, that is, this path of changing
00:37:06
power immediately goes the second way
00:37:09
the dictionary has an armed uprising, well,
00:37:12
I don’t yet remember a single case in previously
00:37:15
quite developed countries, but in
00:37:17
African countries in the 60s and 70s, a
00:37:19
captain could come and demolish the regime
00:37:23
headed by a colonel, then a
00:37:24
lieutenant would come, and then a sergeant would come,
00:37:26
trial corporal and then home does
00:37:28
n’t work like that now, and it’s clear that with a
00:37:29
modern state,
00:37:31
he can’t cope with such an uprising and he can’t cope alone. Then
00:37:34
the question arises: what is a
00:37:37
revolution and currency, a movement from below, as the
00:37:39
classic
00:37:40
Vladimir Lenin said, when the top people don’t want the husband,
00:37:42
they don’t want the bottom people In Belarus, this
00:37:45
situation arose in August of the twentieth
00:37:46
year and when you had a mass
00:37:49
movement from below that the lower classes did not want, people
00:37:51
did not refuse to live like this, but the problem
00:37:54
in Belarus was that the
00:37:56
political elite were at the top and well, like
00:37:59
resistance or opposition, they were not
00:38:01
ready and Belarusian politicians were not were able to
00:38:04
take advantage of this opportunity
00:38:06
to create artificially it is impossible there is no
00:38:08
such thing that there are no chances, but
00:38:10
practice shows that chances
00:38:12
return in Belarus, they come there with a
00:38:14
cycle of ten years to
00:38:17
say that it will happen in 10
00:38:19
years, I cannot promise to say that this will not
00:38:22
happen I can’t promise before either, but
00:38:24
again I don’t believe that pressure from
00:38:28
the West, economic sanctions,
00:38:31
will lead to a change in the political regime,
00:38:32
unfortunately, well, it doesn’t work that way, and that’s exactly
00:38:35
the recipe, it’s actually general, yes
00:38:37
it’s working with electoral work with the
00:38:40
population convey your point of view
00:38:41
to explain that changes in the life of the country are
00:38:44
necessary and at some point it will
00:38:47
definitely break through because in
00:38:49
Belarus and in Russia the population is
00:38:52
quite competent but understands very well
00:38:54
yes, this is this fig in your pocket
00:38:56
it is growing and I write it is called simply
00:38:59
must something will happen in Belarus
00:39:02
happened in the summer of 1920 someday
00:39:04
it will break through again to say that you can
00:39:06
always live like this, it’s definitely impossible unfortunately
00:39:10
you know this game is the politics of this this is a
00:39:12
100 York distance race you don’t
00:39:14
always know what its size is from
00:39:17
maybe 10 kilometers and maybe
00:39:19
much more, in general, we are waiting for the next
00:39:22
mistakes
00:39:23
that people shout, you know, these are
00:39:26
active people who have left, you know, here are the
00:39:28
wrong phrases, we are waiting for Lukashenko’s mistakes,
00:39:31
his whole policy is a mistake, just like
00:39:33
Putin’s that Putin that Lukashenko they are
00:39:36
victims in the future of the country before this It
00:39:39
’s a big mistake that a politician who just
00:39:41
maybe doesn’t think about what
00:39:43
will happen after us, even a flood, that one or the
00:39:46
other, the whole policy is wrong, the question is
00:39:48
at what point a
00:39:50
significant part of the population a significant
00:39:52
part of the ordinary population there is quite
00:39:55
also called like this someone of the
00:39:57
deep people and how this is
00:39:59
what they say in Russia until they understand that we are tired of it,
00:40:02
we can’t do this anymore, we don’t
00:40:05
want it anymore, and it doesn’t depend there, no,
00:40:08
they’ll point to Lukashenko, the mod didn’t do anything for this,
00:40:10
this one there is like a haqq in Tunisia, and
00:40:14
what kind of copper small shopkeepers are they?
00:40:17
lights up due to the fact that they got
00:40:20
these extortions from the local police,
00:40:22
no one knows what will cause it, well,
00:40:25
that’s it, I’m back again to point out that
00:40:27
she has a whole policy mistake, thank you
00:40:29
very much for the meeting, it was very interesting
00:40:31
to talk, richer for all of us Russians in
00:40:33
Belarus, good luck

Description:

Как Путин использует Беларусь и Украину, чтобы держать Запад в напряжении? Почему санкции не способны убить режим? Кто на самом деле замешан в миграционном кризисе и стоит ли в будущем после смены власти на демократическую вступать в Евросоюз или достаточно будет просто иметь доступ на их рынок? Обо всём этом смотрите в большом интервью с российским экономистом Сергеем Алексашенко. 00:00 Главные тезисы интервью 01:14 Подписание интеграционных карт — это фикция или жест в сторону Запада? 03:59 Зачем Путин наращивает военное присутствие в Беларуси? 06:21 Почему Путин ведёт диалог с Западом на языке агрессии? 11:29 Способны ли санкции уничтожить беларусский режим и страдает ли от них Путин? 18:46 Как пострадает Беларусь от запуска «Северного потока-2»? 20:40 Способна ли Польша полностью отказаться от российского газа? 24:24 Кто замешан в миграционном кризисе на границе Беларуси и ЕС? 26:42 Как закрытие пункта погранконтроля на беларусско-польской границе скажется на российской экономике? 28:23 Почему новая Беларусь в период экономических реформ рискует повторить судьбу России в 90-х? 29:58 План Маршалла поможет? 32:03 Работает ли приватизация? 33:49 Способна ли Беларусь в будущем просуществовать без вступления в Евросоюз? 36:25 Смогут ли беларусы избавиться от режима мирным способом? НОВОЕ НА МАЛАНКЕ: Новый выпуск новостей (Мигранты возвращаются домой / Инцидент в ивацевичской колонии / Россию отключат от SWIFT): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZCpqgiyXWo Новый выпуск новостей регионов (Антисанкционные схемы / Беловежская пуща осудила поляков / Деда Мороза переоденут в партизана): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC3YZmHpawY Вброс-Опрос с создателем канала "Усы Лукашенко" Сергеем Беспаловым: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taTbCBtxOZE Николай Халезин о новых санкциях и перспективах режима: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjqWY9-VEw0 Сооснователь фонда BYSOL Андрей Стрижак отвечает на вопросы о Беларуси (Как бежать из Беларуси / Заочные суды / Помощь уволенным): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opCDyWUtHGU Задать свой вопрос вы можете в комментариях к видео или прислать в наш Telegram-бот @Malanka_inbox_bot НАШ НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ МАЛАНКА LIVE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCltb51YP8DB3L5XRq6E4TLw ТЕКСТОВАЯ ВЕРСИЯ МАЛАНКИ Наш сайт - https://zubr.media/ ПОДДЕРЖИ ПОЛИТЗАКЛЮЧЕННЫХ Найти и поддержать политзаключенных: https://politzek.me/ Помоги собрать посылку политзаключенному: https://ru.stranafund.org/blog/fund/pomosch-politzakluchenim Сайт помощи политзаключенным: https://dissidentby.com/ Написать политзаключенным: https://vkletochku.org/ ПОДДЕРЖИ МАЛАНКУ Вы можете помочь команде Маланки донатами: https://getdonate.org/en/campaign/196 Сбор для Маланки на платформе Digital Solidarity: https://app.digitalsolidarity.io/fundraisers/947 Поддержка гражданского телевидения Маланка Медиа на BYSOL: https://www.bysol.org/ru/initiatives/malanka/ НЕ ЗАБУДЬ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ Маланка в Tik Tok https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8qhewbb/ Наша группа в Одноклассниках https://ok.ru/group/59911877820542 Наша группа Вконтакте https://vk.com/public203292097 Подписывайтесь на телеграм Маланки https://t.me/malanka Посмотрите, что у нас в Инсте https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Наша страница в Facebook https://www.facebook.com/unsupportedbrowser Читайте нас в Твиттере https://twitter.com/MalankaMedia Наше сообщество в Viber: https://invite.viber.com/?g2=AQB9Z2ko7lF9ak2g74h0lNV0iT3Dr7y0qAjUk4tDHAY/64e1AGGQZ03C5MSq0KIs

Preparing download options

popular icon
Popular
hd icon
HD video
audio icon
Only sound
total icon
All
* — If the video is playing in a new tab, go to it, then right-click on the video and select "Save video as..."
** — Link intended for online playback in specialized players

Questions about downloading video

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет" video?mobile menu icon

  • http://unidownloader.com/ website is the best way to download a video or a separate audio track if you want to do without installing programs and extensions.

  • The UDL Helper extension is a convenient button that is seamlessly integrated into YouTube, Instagram and OK.ru sites for fast content download.

  • UDL Client program (for Windows) is the most powerful solution that supports more than 900 websites, social networks and video hosting sites, as well as any video quality that is available in the source.

  • UDL Lite is a really convenient way to access a website from your mobile device. With its help, you can easily download videos directly to your smartphone.

mobile menu iconWhich format of "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет" video should I choose?mobile menu icon

  • The best quality formats are FullHD (1080p), 2K (1440p), 4K (2160p) and 8K (4320p). The higher the resolution of your screen, the higher the video quality should be. However, there are other factors to consider: download speed, amount of free space, and device performance during playback.

mobile menu iconWhy does my computer freeze when loading a "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет" video?mobile menu icon

  • The browser/computer should not freeze completely! If this happens, please report it with a link to the video. Sometimes videos cannot be downloaded directly in a suitable format, so we have added the ability to convert the file to the desired format. In some cases, this process may actively use computer resources.

mobile menu iconHow can I download "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет" video to my phone?mobile menu icon

  • You can download a video to your smartphone using the website or the PWA application UDL Lite. It is also possible to send a download link via QR code using the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I download an audio track (music) to MP3 "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет"?mobile menu icon

  • The most convenient way is to use the UDL Client program, which supports converting video to MP3 format. In some cases, MP3 can also be downloaded through the UDL Helper extension.

mobile menu iconHow can I save a frame from a video "Путин держит Запад в напряжении / «Северный поток-2» подкупил ЕС / План Маршалла не поможет"?mobile menu icon

  • This feature is available in the UDL Helper extension. Make sure that "Show the video snapshot button" is checked in the settings. A camera icon should appear in the lower right corner of the player to the left of the "Settings" icon. When you click on it, the current frame from the video will be saved to your computer in JPEG format.

mobile menu iconWhat's the price of all this stuff?mobile menu icon

  • It costs nothing. Our services are absolutely free for all users. There are no PRO subscriptions, no restrictions on the number or maximum length of downloaded videos.